CERN Accelerating science

Data-to-simulation comparison as a function of the jet multiplicity. The processes included are listed in Table~\ref{events}. The QCD multijet background is estimated using control samples in data. The $\ttbar$ background is scaled as discussed in Section~\ref{WdataMC}. The error bars in the ratio panel represent the combined statistical uncertainty of the data and simulation.

Data-to-simulation comparison as functions of the leading jet $\pt$ (left) and $\Delta\phi(\text{$\PGm$, $j_{1}$})$ between the muon and the leading jet (right) for one jet inclusive production. The processes included are listed in Table~\ref{events}. The QCD multijet background is estimated using control samples in data. The $\ttbar$ background is scaled as discussed in Section~\ref{WdataMC}. The error bars in the ratio panel represent the combined statistical uncertainty of the data and simulation.

Data-to-simulation comparison as functions of the leading jet $\pt$ (left) and $\Delta\phi(\text{$\PGm$, $j_{1}$})$ between the muon and the leading jet (right) for one jet inclusive production. The processes included are listed in Table~\ref{events}. The QCD multijet background is estimated using control samples in data. The $\ttbar$ background is scaled as discussed in Section~\ref{WdataMC}. The error bars in the ratio panel represent the combined statistical uncertainty of the data and simulation.

Differential cross section measurement for the exclusive (left) and inclusive jet multiplicities (right), compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The band around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx prediction represents its theoretical uncertainty including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratios of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the exclusive (left) and inclusive jet multiplicities (right), compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The band around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx prediction represents its theoretical uncertainty including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratios of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the transverse momenta of the four leading jets, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the first leading jet $\pt$. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratios of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the transverse momenta of the four leading jets, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the first leading jet $\pt$. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratios of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the transverse momenta of the four leading jets, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the first leading jet $\pt$. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratios of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the transverse momenta of the four leading jets, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the first leading jet $\pt$. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratios of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the absolute rapidities of the four leading jets, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the first leading jet $|y|$. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratios of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the absolute rapidities of the four leading jets, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the first leading jet $|y|$. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratios of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the absolute rapidities of the four leading jets, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the first leading jet $|y|$. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratios of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the absolute rapidities of the four leading jets, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the first leading jet $|y|$. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratios of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the jets $\HT$, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the jets $\HT$ for one jet inclusive production. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratio of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the jets $\HT$, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the jets $\HT$ for one jet inclusive production. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratio of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the jets $\HT$, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the jets $\HT$ for one jet inclusive production. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratio of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for the jets $\HT$, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in the jets $\HT$ for one jet inclusive production. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratio of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for $\Delta\phi(\text{$\PGm$, $j_{i}$})$, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in $\Delta\phi(\text{$\PGm$, $j_{1}$})$ for one jet inclusive production. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratio of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for $\Delta\phi(\text{$\PGm$, $j_{i}$})$, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in $\Delta\phi(\text{$\PGm$, $j_{1}$})$ for one jet inclusive production. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratio of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for $\Delta\phi(\text{$\PGm$, $j_{i}$})$, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in $\Delta\phi(\text{$\PGm$, $j_{1}$})$ for one jet inclusive production. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratio of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for $\Delta\phi(\text{$\PGm$, $j_{i}$})$, shown from left to right for at least 1 and 2 jets (upper) and for at least 3 and 4 jets (lower) on the figures, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and LO MG\_aMC. The NNLO prediction for $\PW$+1-jet is included in $\Delta\phi(\text{$\PGm$, $j_{1}$})$ for one jet inclusive production. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratio of the prediction to the unfolded data.

Differential cross section measurement for $\Delta R(\text{$\PGm$, closest jet})$ for one jet inclusive production, compared to the predictions of NLO MG\_aMC FxFx, LO MG\_aMC, and the NNLO calculation. All jets in the events are required to have $\pt > 100\GeV $, with the leading jet $\pt > 300\GeV$. The black circular markers with the gray hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and the total experimental uncertainty. The LO MG\_aMC prediction is given only with its statistical uncertainty. The bands around the NLO MG\_aMC FxFx and NNLO predictions represent their theoretical uncertainties including both statistical and systematic components. The lower panels show the ratio of the prediction to the unfolded data.