@Article{info:doi/10.2196/cancer.6996,
author="Hartkopf, Andreas D
and Graf, Joachim
and Simoes, Elisabeth
and Keilmann, Lucia
and Sickenberger, Nina
and Gass, Paul
and Wallwiener, Diethelm
and Matthies, Lina
and Taran, Florin-Andrei
and Lux, Michael P
and Wallwiener, Stephanie
and Belleville, Eric
and Sohn, Christof
and Fasching, Peter A
and Schneeweiss, Andreas
and Brucker, Sara Y
and Wallwiener, Markus",
title="Electronic-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes: Willingness, Needs, and Barriers in Adjuvant and Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients",
journal="JMIR Cancer",
year="2017",
month="Aug",
day="07",
volume="3",
number="2",
pages="e11",
keywords="breast cancer; patient-reported outcome measures; electronic patient- reported outcome; technical skills; willingness to use; needs and barriers",
abstract="Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) play an increasingly important role as an adjunct to clinical outcome parameters in measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In fact, PROs are already the accepted gold standard for collecting data about patients' subjective perception of their own state of health. Currently, paper-based surveys of PRO still predominate; however, knowledge regarding the feasibility of and barriers to electronic-based PRO (ePRO) acceptance remains limited. Objective: The objective of this trial was to analyze the willingness, specific needs, and barriers of adjuvant breast cancer (aBC) and metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients in nonexposed (no exposure to electronic assessment) and exposed (after exposure to electronic assessment decision, whether a tablet-based questionnaire is favored) settings before implementing digital ePRO assessment in relation to health status. We also investigated whether providing support can increase the patients' willingness to participate in such programs. Methods: The nonexposed patients only answered a paper-based questionnaire, whereas the exposed patients filled out both paper- and tablet-based questionnaires. The assessment comprised socioeconomic variables, HRQoL, preexisting technical skills, general attitude toward electronic-based surveys, and potential barriers in relation to health status. Furthermore, nonexposed patients were asked about the existing need for technological support structures. In the course of data evaluation, we performed a frequency analysis as well as chi-square tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Subsequently, relative risks analysis, univariate categorical regression (CATREG), and mediation analyses (Hayes' bias-corrected bootstrap) were performed. Results: A total of 202 female breast cancer patients completed the PRO assessment (nonexposed group: n=96 patients; exposed group: n=106 patients). Self-reported technical skills were higher in exposed patients (2.79 vs 2.33, P ≤.001). Significant differences were found in relation to willingness to use ePRO (92.3{\%} in the exposed group vs 59{\%} in the nonexposed group; P=.001). Multiple barriers were identified, and most of them showed statistically significant differences in favor of the exposed patients (ie, data security [13{\%} in the exposed patients vs 30{\%} in the nonexposed patients; P=.003] and no prior technology usage [5{\%} in the exposed group vs 15{\%} in the nonexposed group; P=.02]), whereas the differences in disease burden (somatic dimension: 4{\%} in the exposed group vs 9{\%} in the nonexposed group; P=.13) showed no significance. In nonexposed patients, requests for support services were identified, which could increase their ePRO willingness. Conclusions: Significant barriers in relation to HRQoL, cancer-related restrictions, and especially the setting of the survey were identified in this trial. Thus, it is necessary to address and eliminate these barriers to ensure data accuracy and reliability for future ePRO assessments. Exposure seems to be a potential option to increase willingness to use ePRO and to reduce barriers. ",
issn="2369-1999",
doi="10.2196/cancer.6996",
url="http://cancer.jmir.org/2017/2/e11/",
url="https://doi.org/10.2196/cancer.6996",
url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28784595"
}