Measurement of the $CP$ properties of Higgs boson interactions with $\tau$-leptons with the ATLAS detector
A study of the charge conjugation and parity ($CP$) properties of the interaction between the Higgs boson and $\tau$-leptons is presented. The study is based on a measurement of $CP$-sensitive angular observables defined by the visible decay products of $\tau$-lepton decays, where at least one hadronic decay is required. The analysis uses 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton–proton collision data recorded at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}= 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Contributions from $CP$-violating interactions between the Higgs boson and $\tau$-leptons are described by a single mixing angle parameter $\phi_{\tau}$ in the generalised Yukawa interaction. Without assuming the Standard Model hypothesis for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ signal strength, the mixing angle $\phi_{\tau}$ is measured to be $9^{\circ} \pm 16^{\circ}$, with an expected value of $0^{\circ} \pm 28^{\circ}$ at the 68% confidence level. The pure $CP$-odd hypothesis is disfavoured at a level of 3.4 standard deviations. The results are compatible with the predictions for the Higgs boson in the Standard Model.
12 December 2022
Table 01
Notation for the dominant leptonic and hadronic τ-lepton decay modes used and their branching fractions. The symbol 'ℓ
±' stands for e
± or μ
±, and 'h
±' includes π
± and K
±. The parentheses show the hadronic decays involving π
± and their corresponding branching fractions.
png (18kB)
pdf (47kB)
Table 02
Decay mode combinations of the τ-lepton pair and the corresponding methods to construct the φ
*CP observable used in this analysis. The fraction of events for each decay mode combination relative to the total from all di-τ decay combinations (last column) is calculated using the τ-lepton decay mode branching fractions in Table 1.
png (25kB)
pdf (40kB)
Table 03
Summary of selection criteria for the VBF and Boost categories in this analysis. The criteria are common to the τ
lepτ
had and τ
hadτ
had decay channels.
png (31kB)
pdf (61kB)
Table 04
Summary of additional selection criteria for the signal regions in the τ
lepτ
had channel.
png (30kB)
pdf (50kB)
Table 05
Summary of additional selection criteria for the signal regions in the τ
hadτ
had channel.
png (32kB)
pdf (50kB)
Table 06
Free-floating parameters in the measurement. Observed and expected values are shown for the CP-mixing angle (φ
τ), the signal strength (μ
ττ) and various background normalisations for Z → ττ (NF
Z → ττ) corresponding to different signal phase-space regions.
png (14kB)
pdf (48kB)
Figure 01
Normalised φ
*CP distribution before detector effects in simulated H→τ
+τ
-→π
+π
0νπ
-π
0ν (1p1n-1p1n) events for different CP hypotheses.
png (60kB)
pdf (16kB)
Figure 02
Normalised φ
*CP distribution before detector effects in simulated H→τ
+τ
-→π
+νπ
-π
0ν (1p0n-1p1n) events for different CP hypotheses.
png (61kB)
pdf (16kB)
Figure 03
Normalised φ
*CP distribution before detector effects in simulated H→τ
+τ
-→ℓ
+ννπ
-ν (ℓ-1p0n) events for different CP hypotheses.
png (60kB)
pdf (16kB)
Figure 04
Normalised φ
*CP distribution before detector effects in simulated H→τ
+τ
-→ℓ
+ννπ
-π
0ν (ℓ-1p1n) events for different CP hypotheses.
png (60kB)
pdf (16kB)
Figure 05
Number of events for each hadronic τ lepton decay mode reconstructed in the τ
lepτ
had channel used in this analysis. The events include all signal region categories (Boost_1, Boost_0, VBF_1 and VBF_0) in the τ
lepτ
had channel within the Higgs boson mass window (110 GeV < m
ττMMC < 150 GeV). 'Other backgrounds' include W, diboson, top, Z→ ℓℓ and H→ WW
*. The hatched band represents the statistical uncertainty on the prediction.
png (117kB)
pdf (17kB)
Figure 06
Number of events for each τ lepton pair decay mode combination reconstructed in the τ
hadτ
had channel used in this analysis. The events include all signal region categories (Boost_1, Boost_0, VBF_1 and VBF_0) in the τ
hadτ
had channel within the Higgs boson mass window (110 GeV < m
ττMMC < 150 GeV). 'Other backgrounds' include W, diboson, top, Z→ ℓℓ and H→ WW
*. The hatched band represents the statistical uncertainty on the prediction.
png (127kB)
pdf (18kB)
Figure 07a
(a) Efficiency and (b) purity matrices of the POWHEG+PYTHIA VBF H → ττ signal sample used in the analysis. Each element in the efficiency matrix is normalised by the total number of events in its corresponding generated decay mode (column), while an element in the purity matrix is normalised by the total events in the corresponding reconstructed decay mode (row).
png (120kB)
pdf (13kB)
Figure 07b
(a) Efficiency and (b) purity matrices of the POWHEG+PYTHIA VBF H → ττ signal sample used in the analysis. Each element in the efficiency matrix is normalised by the total number of events in its corresponding generated decay mode (column), while an element in the purity matrix is normalised by the total events in the corresponding reconstructed decay mode (row).
png (118kB)
pdf (13kB)
Figure 08
A schematic summary of the regions and fit parameters used in the fit. All signal regions (12) and control regions (5) in the diagram are defined in each of the τ
lepτ
had and τ
hadτ
had channels, giving a total of 24 (10) signal (control) regions in the likelihood fit. The CP-mixing angle (φ
τ) is the parameter-of-interest (POI). The H → ττ signal strength (μ
ττ), and four normalisation factors (NF) for the Z → ττ process are left free-floating in the fit. Each NF is shared between a control region and the respective signal regions in the same topology category, and across the τ
lepτ
had and τ
hadτ
had channels. The ℓ--1p1n (1p1n--1p1n) control region is defined in the τ
lepτ
had (τ
hadτ
had) channel to control π
0-related uncertainties from data, as described in Section 6.
png (64kB)
pdf (98kB)
Figure 09a
Post-fit event yields in the Z→ττ control regions in the (a) τ
lepτ
had and (b) τ
hadτ
had channels. The control regions are represented by the labels of the bins. 'Other backgrounds' include W, diboson, top, Z→ ℓℓ and H→ WW
*. The hatched uncertainty band includes all sources of uncertainty after the fit to data.
png (59kB)
pdf (17kB)
Figure 09b
Post-fit event yields in the Z→ττ control regions in the (a) τ
lepτ
had and (b) τ
hadτ
had channels. The control regions are represented by the labels of the bins. 'Other backgrounds' include W, diboson, top, Z→ ℓℓ and H→ WW
*. The hatched uncertainty band includes all sources of uncertainty after the fit to data.
png (58kB)
pdf (17kB)
Figure 10
A 2D likelihood scan of the expected signal strength μ
ττ versus the CP-mixing angle φ
τ. The 1σ and 2σ confidence regions are shown.
png (54kB)
pdf (16kB)
Figure 11
Candidate event display of a Higgs boson, produced in association with two additional jets (yellow cones), with the Higgs boson decaying to two τ leptons (blue cones) . Both τ leptons decay subsequently to a charged pion, characterised by a trajectory in the inner detector (blue line). Energy deposits in the electromagnetic calorimeter (green) not connected to a charged particle trajectory can be caused by additional neutral pions in the τ lepton decay. The white dashed line represents the missing transverse energy due to the undetected neutrinos from the τ lepton decays. The bottom left view shows the same objects projected onto the r-φ plane.
png (1MB)
pdf (782kB)
Table 01
Summary of event selection requirements in the τ
lepτ
had channel (preselection). The transverse mass m
T is calculated from the momentum of the light lepton and E
Tmiss. The quantities x
1 and x
2 are the momentum fraction carried by the visible decay products of the leading and sub-leading reconstructed τ leptons respectively, with the E
Tmiss components decomposed in the collinear approximation.
png (27kB)
pdf (59kB)
Table 02
Summary of event selection requirements in the τ
hadτ
had channel (preselection). The quantities x
1 and x
2 are the momentum fraction carried by the visible decay products of the leading and sub-leading reconstructed τ leptons respectively, with the E
Tmiss components decomposed in the collinear approximation.
png (25kB)
pdf (59kB)
Table 03
Expected sensitivities in excluding pure CP-odd Hττ coupling in different groups of signal regions.
png (37kB)
pdf (41kB)