Critical analysis of the paper "Peirce on phaneroscopical analysis. " by Prof. Francesco Belluci ., 2021
The circumstances of the production of this critique show how important it is for a community to ... more The circumstances of the production of this critique show how important it is for a community to have venues for debate that bring together participants who play the game openly and fairly. That this is not sometimes the case should not be an obstacle. After specifying the precise circumstances that motivated my criticism, I developed it as objectively as possible, arguing as clearly as I could, scrupulously citing all my sources. I then drew some conclusions from it, thanks to which it finds, it seems to me, its whole meaning.
Exposé des rapports qu'entretiennent les sciences humaines, dont la sémiotique fait partie, a... more Exposé des rapports qu'entretiennent les sciences humaines, dont la sémiotique fait partie, avec les sciences exactes auxquelles appartient la mathématique. La production actuelle rangée sous les vocables «sémiotique » ou « sémiologie» relèverait de la théorie de l'informe. Par le recours à la mathématisation, l'auteur entend jeter les bases d'une sémiotique scientifique.
Esta colección de definiciones fue publicada en 1990 en mi libro "L'algèbre des signes : essai de... more Esta colección de definiciones fue publicada en 1990 en mi libro "L'algèbre des signes : essai de sémiotique scientifique d'après Charles S. Peirce". También apareció en páginas web personales que ahora están obsoletas y en la página web Peirce.org donde son un poco difíciles de encontrar en la URL: https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/ rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
Ce recueil de définitions a été publié en 1990 dans mon livre L'algèbre des signes : essai de sém... more Ce recueil de définitions a été publié en 1990 dans mon livre L'algèbre des signes : essai de sémiotique scientifique d'après Charles Il est également apparu sur des sites web personnels qui sont maintenant obsolètes et sur le site web Peirce.org où il est un peu difficile à trouver l'URL : https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
This collection of definitions was published in 1990 in my book
L'algèbre des signes : essai de ... more This collection of definitions was published in 1990 in my book L'algèbre des signes : essai de sémiotique scientifique d'après Charles S. Peirce, vol. 24, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, coll. « Foundations of Semiotics », 1990, 409 p. (ISBN 9789027232960) It also appeared on personal websites that are now obsolete and on the website Peirce.org where it is a bit difficult to find it at the URL : https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
La "machine" proposée dans ce travail systématise la manière d'obtenir toutes les classes de sign... more La "machine" proposée dans ce travail systématise la manière d'obtenir toutes les classes de signes qu'ils comportent 3 éléments, 6 ou 10 éléments et plus généralement un nombre n quelconque d'éléments, dès lors qu'ils sont ordonnés par des suites de déterminations successives bien définies. C'est le cas pour n=3 et n=6 (mais n'est pas acquis pour n= 10) ; pour tous les autres cas on parlera de "protosignes". On s'intéresse particlièrement aux classes de signes triadiques pour lesquelles on montre la parfaite adéquation du modèle aux textes fondamentaux de C.S. Peirce (CP 2.254 à 2.263, suivis mot à mot). Il s'avère en outre que les formalismes utilisés permettent d'aller au-delà de ce résultat en démontrant que les classes de signes ou de protosignes sont dans chaque cas ordonnancées dans une structure algébrique de treillis, ce qui confirme les intuitions de C.S. Peirce (CP 2.264 et 2.265). En fait c'est une architectonique qui est mise en évidence et de nombreuses conséquences peuvent en être tirées. On exploite ici celles qui résultent des cas simples n=1 et n=2. Abstract The "machine" proposed in this work systematises the way to obtain all classes of signs that they contain 3 elements, 6 or 10 elements and more generally an n number of elements, when they are ordered by a series of well-defined successive determinations. This is the case for n=3 and n=6 (but is not acquired for n=10); for all other cases we will speak of "protosigns". We are particularly interested in the classes of triadic signs for which we show the perfect fit of the model with the fundamental texts of C.S. Peirce (CP 2.254 to 2.263, followed word by word). It
This article is a faithful contribution to the scientific fame of Charles S. Peirce. To this end,... more This article is a faithful contribution to the scientific fame of Charles S. Peirce. To this end, I set mathematics in the place where Peirce himself put it, at the head of the Sciences of Discovery, at the entrance of his "well of truth." I show that a straightforward algebraic structure (Partially Ordered Set) is implemented in his phaneroscopy and is deployed into the sciences that depend on it, that is, in order: Philosophy, Normative Sciences, Metaphysics, Physical Sciences, Social Sciences, Psychology. A tri-dimensional diagram in the form of a podium visualizes this implementation, making expressly visible certain distinctions relative to the authentic and degenerate cases. Unfortunately, these mathematical structures were often ignored, sometimes more or less voluntarily discarded, and always replaced by bricolages. Thus, the existence and nature of inter-categorial relations have lost or obscured, objectively blocking the path of research. Indeed, a large field opens up: the classes of signs, in particular, are organized naturally in lattice structures which Peirce had intuited by noticing affinities between these classes. Moreover, the recourse always possible to Category Theory and Graph Theory increases the possibilities of new developments considerably. From then on, the image of Peirce as a taxonomist fades away and appears as a precursor of a "dynamic structuralism" fully expressed in his pragmaticism.
Replicas of a "peculiar kind" provide all the varieties of tokens (six only)., 2021
In the Peircean Semiotics, there is certain confusion on the terminological level as on the seman... more In the Peircean Semiotics, there is certain confusion on the terminological level as on the semantic one on the distinctions or the formal equivalences of the terms: signs, type, token to which one can add, instance, graph, graph-Instance, replica, graph-replica and probably still others... These confusions can lead, as Peirce underlines it, to "Imaginary distinctions which are often drawn between beliefs which differ only in their mode of expression" ; but with "wrangling which ensues real enough" (CP 5.398) and even to "to mistake the sensation produced by our own unclearness of thought for a character of the object we are thinking" (CP 5.398). This short note proposes unifying this sector of knowledge of Peirce's work around his ten classes of signs and the relations of embodiment they maintain. It is proved that there can only be six kinds of tokens and only six, relying only on his use of the term "replica" in his definitions of the classes of signs.
Peirce's classes of signs have given rise to a large number of approaches aimed at exposing them,... more Peirce's classes of signs have given rise to a large number of approaches aimed at exposing them, illustrating them, modeling them, formalizing them in different terms, and in some cases testing their operationality. Among these approaches, one can distinguish and characterize "iconographic models." Four of them are studied. They are certainly known to most Peircean: the "tripods" of Floy Merrell, the "trikonics" of Gary Richmond, the "cornered signs" of Priscila Farias and Joao Queiroz, which derives from drawings of Peirce's hand himself (named so for convenience), the "signtrees" of Priscila Borges. We demonstrate that they are all isomorphic to the classes of signs obtained by the algebraical method and, consequently, isomorphic between them. But this algebraic model also shows that the set of 10 classes of signs is organized in a lattice structure, which is a natural extension of the Peircean theory of signs. Peirce, defining "affinities" between sign classes, had intuited the existence of this algebraic structure, but it was not yet available as such at his time. Relative to the state in which Peirce left us his semiotics, this model is, so to speak, "epistemologically pure.
Animated visual evidence of the encapsulation of the classes of signs in the lattice of the 10 cl... more Animated visual evidence of the encapsulation of the classes of signs in the lattice of the 10 classes, regardless of how they were obtained.
This article is exclusively devoted to the subdivisions mentioned by Peirce in CP 2.265. It shows... more This article is exclusively devoted to the subdivisions mentioned by Peirce in CP 2.265. It shows that the lattice of the 10 classes of signs is a development that perfectly prolongs Peirce's conception of these classes of signs and also and especially of their affinities. He could not express it in formal terms because he did not have at his disposal mathematical tools that will only be available after his death1. In short, we show that it is as if Peirce "had the lattice in mind". It seems to us that this work, perhaps a little tedious, should definitively install the lattice as an additional tool for apprehending meanings and evacuating critics who unfairly consider Peirce's theory of signs as a sterile taxonomy. .
This article begins with a preamble that first examines the general problem of the production of ... more This article begins with a preamble that first examines the general problem of the production of mathematical models in the social sciences and humanities. This is not the first simplification we propose. Feedback has taught us that we needed to go even further to ensure that our initial proposals made more than 40 years ago are acceptable to the entire community working in the same field. The responsibility for this long delay lies mainly with the author, who proposes here to redeem himself by detailing to the extreme both his methodology and the simplest techniques he has found in order to allow critical access to this natural extension of Peirce's semiotics from the state in which he left it to us.
This text is the "natural" continuation of a previous note 1 in which five possible paths and onl... more This text is the "natural" continuation of a previous note 1 in which five possible paths and only five, within the lattice of the ten classes of signs, were identified. We distinguish for their different epistemological value the degenerative paths (from the argument until the qualisign) from the accretive paths (from the qualisign until the argument). The first ones are already existing at the moment of analysis, the second must be built, and when they concern the same objects of knowledge, they can compete with the first2. Then we show by a diagrammatic reasoning that these five paths can be themselves organized in a lattice structure with a non-total order, an abduction that we then prove by an rigorous algebraic reasoning. As a consequence, we have a new immanent structure that puts an unquestionable formal order between the dynamic modes of knowledge acquisition and also, in the opposite direction, in the degradations that may occur during their acquisition. More generally, thanks to this tool we will be able to apprehend the evolution, creation, conflicts of scientific paradigms, concerning also the humanities.
The "affinities" according to CS Peirce: the possibility of a lattice. Abstract C.S. Peirce accur... more The "affinities" according to CS Peirce: the possibility of a lattice. Abstract C.S. Peirce accurately evoked certain "affinities" between classes of signs that he defined, categorized and visualized. We find them traced by his hand in MS 540, we find them in the Collected Papers (2.264), in The Essential Peirce (2:296). They follow a full description of each class. Moreover, some of these descriptions cannot be understood without resorting to these affinities. Moreover, I myself have produced a mathematical object-"The lattice of the classes of signs"-resulting from a formalization of the production of classes of signs by means of functors 1 (category theory) and then, to simplify access, of Posets 2 (order structures in Set Theory). I have always asserted about this mathematical object that it was perfectly embodied in the classes of signs described empirically by C.S.Peirce and that the diagram of the MS 540 showed that he had had the intuition of their ordering in the lattice structure that I proposed. It may have been a bit vague to convince. In this short article I demonstrate that the affinity relationship between classes as it results from the "historical" C.S.Peirce diagram is "encapsulated" by the relationship between classes of signs which allowed me to build (and generalize) a natural lattice structure on these same classes. For that I compare the graphs of each relation and the result is without appeal. The result is that Peirce not only had the intuition of the lattice but that he had it, so to speak, at hand. I am convinced that if he had had at his disposal this structure, which only really emerged in the minds of mathematicians at the time of the publication of Birkhoff's book 3 , "Lattice theory" (1940), twenty-five years after his death, he would have made wonderful use of it.
A formalization of the classes of signs and their architectonic that uses only the more well-know... more A formalization of the classes of signs and their architectonic that uses only the more well-known notions of ordered sets and the applications that preserve order, without mobilizing any concept of the category theory.
Critical analysis of the paper "Peirce on phaneroscopical analysis. " by Prof. Francesco Belluci ., 2021
The circumstances of the production of this critique show how important it is for a community to ... more The circumstances of the production of this critique show how important it is for a community to have venues for debate that bring together participants who play the game openly and fairly. That this is not sometimes the case should not be an obstacle. After specifying the precise circumstances that motivated my criticism, I developed it as objectively as possible, arguing as clearly as I could, scrupulously citing all my sources. I then drew some conclusions from it, thanks to which it finds, it seems to me, its whole meaning.
Exposé des rapports qu'entretiennent les sciences humaines, dont la sémiotique fait partie, a... more Exposé des rapports qu'entretiennent les sciences humaines, dont la sémiotique fait partie, avec les sciences exactes auxquelles appartient la mathématique. La production actuelle rangée sous les vocables «sémiotique » ou « sémiologie» relèverait de la théorie de l'informe. Par le recours à la mathématisation, l'auteur entend jeter les bases d'une sémiotique scientifique.
Esta colección de definiciones fue publicada en 1990 en mi libro "L'algèbre des signes : essai de... more Esta colección de definiciones fue publicada en 1990 en mi libro "L'algèbre des signes : essai de sémiotique scientifique d'après Charles S. Peirce". También apareció en páginas web personales que ahora están obsoletas y en la página web Peirce.org donde son un poco difíciles de encontrar en la URL: https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/ rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
Ce recueil de définitions a été publié en 1990 dans mon livre L'algèbre des signes : essai de sém... more Ce recueil de définitions a été publié en 1990 dans mon livre L'algèbre des signes : essai de sémiotique scientifique d'après Charles Il est également apparu sur des sites web personnels qui sont maintenant obsolètes et sur le site web Peirce.org où il est un peu difficile à trouver l'URL : https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
This collection of definitions was published in 1990 in my book
L'algèbre des signes : essai de ... more This collection of definitions was published in 1990 in my book L'algèbre des signes : essai de sémiotique scientifique d'après Charles S. Peirce, vol. 24, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, coll. « Foundations of Semiotics », 1990, 409 p. (ISBN 9789027232960) It also appeared on personal websites that are now obsolete and on the website Peirce.org where it is a bit difficult to find it at the URL : https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
La "machine" proposée dans ce travail systématise la manière d'obtenir toutes les classes de sign... more La "machine" proposée dans ce travail systématise la manière d'obtenir toutes les classes de signes qu'ils comportent 3 éléments, 6 ou 10 éléments et plus généralement un nombre n quelconque d'éléments, dès lors qu'ils sont ordonnés par des suites de déterminations successives bien définies. C'est le cas pour n=3 et n=6 (mais n'est pas acquis pour n= 10) ; pour tous les autres cas on parlera de "protosignes". On s'intéresse particlièrement aux classes de signes triadiques pour lesquelles on montre la parfaite adéquation du modèle aux textes fondamentaux de C.S. Peirce (CP 2.254 à 2.263, suivis mot à mot). Il s'avère en outre que les formalismes utilisés permettent d'aller au-delà de ce résultat en démontrant que les classes de signes ou de protosignes sont dans chaque cas ordonnancées dans une structure algébrique de treillis, ce qui confirme les intuitions de C.S. Peirce (CP 2.264 et 2.265). En fait c'est une architectonique qui est mise en évidence et de nombreuses conséquences peuvent en être tirées. On exploite ici celles qui résultent des cas simples n=1 et n=2. Abstract The "machine" proposed in this work systematises the way to obtain all classes of signs that they contain 3 elements, 6 or 10 elements and more generally an n number of elements, when they are ordered by a series of well-defined successive determinations. This is the case for n=3 and n=6 (but is not acquired for n=10); for all other cases we will speak of "protosigns". We are particularly interested in the classes of triadic signs for which we show the perfect fit of the model with the fundamental texts of C.S. Peirce (CP 2.254 to 2.263, followed word by word). It
This article is a faithful contribution to the scientific fame of Charles S. Peirce. To this end,... more This article is a faithful contribution to the scientific fame of Charles S. Peirce. To this end, I set mathematics in the place where Peirce himself put it, at the head of the Sciences of Discovery, at the entrance of his "well of truth." I show that a straightforward algebraic structure (Partially Ordered Set) is implemented in his phaneroscopy and is deployed into the sciences that depend on it, that is, in order: Philosophy, Normative Sciences, Metaphysics, Physical Sciences, Social Sciences, Psychology. A tri-dimensional diagram in the form of a podium visualizes this implementation, making expressly visible certain distinctions relative to the authentic and degenerate cases. Unfortunately, these mathematical structures were often ignored, sometimes more or less voluntarily discarded, and always replaced by bricolages. Thus, the existence and nature of inter-categorial relations have lost or obscured, objectively blocking the path of research. Indeed, a large field opens up: the classes of signs, in particular, are organized naturally in lattice structures which Peirce had intuited by noticing affinities between these classes. Moreover, the recourse always possible to Category Theory and Graph Theory increases the possibilities of new developments considerably. From then on, the image of Peirce as a taxonomist fades away and appears as a precursor of a "dynamic structuralism" fully expressed in his pragmaticism.
Replicas of a "peculiar kind" provide all the varieties of tokens (six only)., 2021
In the Peircean Semiotics, there is certain confusion on the terminological level as on the seman... more In the Peircean Semiotics, there is certain confusion on the terminological level as on the semantic one on the distinctions or the formal equivalences of the terms: signs, type, token to which one can add, instance, graph, graph-Instance, replica, graph-replica and probably still others... These confusions can lead, as Peirce underlines it, to "Imaginary distinctions which are often drawn between beliefs which differ only in their mode of expression" ; but with "wrangling which ensues real enough" (CP 5.398) and even to "to mistake the sensation produced by our own unclearness of thought for a character of the object we are thinking" (CP 5.398). This short note proposes unifying this sector of knowledge of Peirce's work around his ten classes of signs and the relations of embodiment they maintain. It is proved that there can only be six kinds of tokens and only six, relying only on his use of the term "replica" in his definitions of the classes of signs.
Peirce's classes of signs have given rise to a large number of approaches aimed at exposing them,... more Peirce's classes of signs have given rise to a large number of approaches aimed at exposing them, illustrating them, modeling them, formalizing them in different terms, and in some cases testing their operationality. Among these approaches, one can distinguish and characterize "iconographic models." Four of them are studied. They are certainly known to most Peircean: the "tripods" of Floy Merrell, the "trikonics" of Gary Richmond, the "cornered signs" of Priscila Farias and Joao Queiroz, which derives from drawings of Peirce's hand himself (named so for convenience), the "signtrees" of Priscila Borges. We demonstrate that they are all isomorphic to the classes of signs obtained by the algebraical method and, consequently, isomorphic between them. But this algebraic model also shows that the set of 10 classes of signs is organized in a lattice structure, which is a natural extension of the Peircean theory of signs. Peirce, defining "affinities" between sign classes, had intuited the existence of this algebraic structure, but it was not yet available as such at his time. Relative to the state in which Peirce left us his semiotics, this model is, so to speak, "epistemologically pure.
Animated visual evidence of the encapsulation of the classes of signs in the lattice of the 10 cl... more Animated visual evidence of the encapsulation of the classes of signs in the lattice of the 10 classes, regardless of how they were obtained.
This article is exclusively devoted to the subdivisions mentioned by Peirce in CP 2.265. It shows... more This article is exclusively devoted to the subdivisions mentioned by Peirce in CP 2.265. It shows that the lattice of the 10 classes of signs is a development that perfectly prolongs Peirce's conception of these classes of signs and also and especially of their affinities. He could not express it in formal terms because he did not have at his disposal mathematical tools that will only be available after his death1. In short, we show that it is as if Peirce "had the lattice in mind". It seems to us that this work, perhaps a little tedious, should definitively install the lattice as an additional tool for apprehending meanings and evacuating critics who unfairly consider Peirce's theory of signs as a sterile taxonomy. .
This article begins with a preamble that first examines the general problem of the production of ... more This article begins with a preamble that first examines the general problem of the production of mathematical models in the social sciences and humanities. This is not the first simplification we propose. Feedback has taught us that we needed to go even further to ensure that our initial proposals made more than 40 years ago are acceptable to the entire community working in the same field. The responsibility for this long delay lies mainly with the author, who proposes here to redeem himself by detailing to the extreme both his methodology and the simplest techniques he has found in order to allow critical access to this natural extension of Peirce's semiotics from the state in which he left it to us.
This text is the "natural" continuation of a previous note 1 in which five possible paths and onl... more This text is the "natural" continuation of a previous note 1 in which five possible paths and only five, within the lattice of the ten classes of signs, were identified. We distinguish for their different epistemological value the degenerative paths (from the argument until the qualisign) from the accretive paths (from the qualisign until the argument). The first ones are already existing at the moment of analysis, the second must be built, and when they concern the same objects of knowledge, they can compete with the first2. Then we show by a diagrammatic reasoning that these five paths can be themselves organized in a lattice structure with a non-total order, an abduction that we then prove by an rigorous algebraic reasoning. As a consequence, we have a new immanent structure that puts an unquestionable formal order between the dynamic modes of knowledge acquisition and also, in the opposite direction, in the degradations that may occur during their acquisition. More generally, thanks to this tool we will be able to apprehend the evolution, creation, conflicts of scientific paradigms, concerning also the humanities.
The "affinities" according to CS Peirce: the possibility of a lattice. Abstract C.S. Peirce accur... more The "affinities" according to CS Peirce: the possibility of a lattice. Abstract C.S. Peirce accurately evoked certain "affinities" between classes of signs that he defined, categorized and visualized. We find them traced by his hand in MS 540, we find them in the Collected Papers (2.264), in The Essential Peirce (2:296). They follow a full description of each class. Moreover, some of these descriptions cannot be understood without resorting to these affinities. Moreover, I myself have produced a mathematical object-"The lattice of the classes of signs"-resulting from a formalization of the production of classes of signs by means of functors 1 (category theory) and then, to simplify access, of Posets 2 (order structures in Set Theory). I have always asserted about this mathematical object that it was perfectly embodied in the classes of signs described empirically by C.S.Peirce and that the diagram of the MS 540 showed that he had had the intuition of their ordering in the lattice structure that I proposed. It may have been a bit vague to convince. In this short article I demonstrate that the affinity relationship between classes as it results from the "historical" C.S.Peirce diagram is "encapsulated" by the relationship between classes of signs which allowed me to build (and generalize) a natural lattice structure on these same classes. For that I compare the graphs of each relation and the result is without appeal. The result is that Peirce not only had the intuition of the lattice but that he had it, so to speak, at hand. I am convinced that if he had had at his disposal this structure, which only really emerged in the minds of mathematicians at the time of the publication of Birkhoff's book 3 , "Lattice theory" (1940), twenty-five years after his death, he would have made wonderful use of it.
A formalization of the classes of signs and their architectonic that uses only the more well-know... more A formalization of the classes of signs and their architectonic that uses only the more well-known notions of ordered sets and the applications that preserve order, without mobilizing any concept of the category theory.
This text is a methodological complement for a "dynamic" use of the lattice of the ten classes of... more This text is a methodological complement for a "dynamic" use of the lattice of the ten classes of signs
Third time of the "trichotomic machine" illustrated by a study of nicotine, installed for a long ... more Third time of the "trichotomic machine" illustrated by a study of nicotine, installed for a long time as a sign whose object is "lethal poison" and which is confronted today with the possibility that it protects Covid 19.
Le "podium" des Catégories Universelles de Peirce et leurs cas dégénérés , 2020
Cet article organise les catégories universelles de Peirce ainsi que leurs formes dégénérées à pa... more Cet article organise les catégories universelles de Peirce ainsi que leurs formes dégénérées à partir de leurs relations de présupposition. Ces relations font l'objet d'une mise au point formelle à partir de la définition des présuppositions selon Frege. Elles sont visualisées dans un diagramme en forme de "podium". Grâce à ce diagramme on suit point par point la bien connue et très souvent citée troisième "Conférence Lowell" de Peirce de 1903 (troisième brouillon) dans laquelle il expose l'intégralité de sa méthode d'analyse fondée sur ses catégories. La congruence très forte qu'on établit ainsi entre le podium et ce texte valide l'importance, voire la nécessité, de prendre en compte ces présuppositions pour appréhender correctement la phénoménologie de Peirce.
Discussions on the number of trichotomies chosen by Charles S. Peirce to create and classify sign... more Discussions on the number of trichotomies chosen by Charles S. Peirce to create and classify signs generated many diverse and varied opinions. This article implements the "trichotomic machine". This machine is obtained by a mathematical modeling which uses only three basic definitions of algebraic theory of categories (category, functor, natural transformation of functors). It is carefully designed to ensure that it fits perfectly with Peirce’s statements on the issue. A computer application created by Patrick Benazet automates its operation when it is applied to suites of objects of thinking (phanerons in Peirce terminology) connected by successive determinations. The results are indisputable. These are well-known order structures called lattice. For cases of triadic and hexadic signs the results were validated a long time ago. However for decadic signs it is shown that the question is still open and that it would be imprudent to take for granted the 66 classes of signs.
Uploads
Papers by robert marty
https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/ rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
L'algèbre des signes : essai de sémiotique scientifique d'après Charles S. Peirce, vol. 24, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, coll. « Foundations of Semiotics », 1990, 409 p. (ISBN 9789027232960)
It also appeared on personal websites that are now obsolete and on the website Peirce.org where it is a bit difficult to find it at the URL : https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
Drafts by robert marty
https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/ rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM
L'algèbre des signes : essai de sémiotique scientifique d'après Charles S. Peirce, vol. 24, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, coll. « Foundations of Semiotics », 1990, 409 p. (ISBN 9789027232960)
It also appeared on personal websites that are now obsolete and on the website Peirce.org where it is a bit difficult to find it at the URL : https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM