@inproceedings{rambelli-etal-2020-comparing,
title = "Comparing Probabilistic, Distributional and Transformer-Based Models on Logical Metonymy Interpretation",
author = "Rambelli, Giulia and
Chersoni, Emmanuele and
Lenci, Alessandro and
Blache, Philippe and
Huang, Chu-Ren",
editor = "Wong, Kam-Fai and
Knight, Kevin and
Wu, Hua",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 10th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing",
month = dec,
year = "2020",
address = "Suzhou, China",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.aacl-main.26",
pages = "224--234",
abstract = "In linguistics and cognitive science, Logical metonymies are defined as type clashes between an event-selecting verb and an entity-denoting noun (e.g. The editor finished the article), which are typically interpreted by inferring a hidden event (e.g. reading) on the basis of contextual cues. This paper tackles the problem of logical metonymy interpretation, that is, the retrieval of the covert event via computational methods. We compare different types of models, including the probabilistic and the distributional ones previously introduced in the literature on the topic. For the first time, we also tested on this task some of the recent Transformer-based models, such as BERT, RoBERTa, XLNet, and GPT-2. Our results show a complex scenario, in which the best Transformer-based models and some traditional distributional models perform very similarly. However, the low performance on some of the testing datasets suggests that logical metonymy is still a challenging phenomenon for computational modeling.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="rambelli-etal-2020-comparing">
<titleInfo>
<title>Comparing Probabilistic, Distributional and Transformer-Based Models on Logical Metonymy Interpretation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Giulia</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rambelli</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Emmanuele</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chersoni</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alessandro</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lenci</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Philippe</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Blache</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chu-Ren</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Huang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2020-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 10th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kam-Fai</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wong</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kevin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Knight</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hua</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Suzhou, China</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>In linguistics and cognitive science, Logical metonymies are defined as type clashes between an event-selecting verb and an entity-denoting noun (e.g. The editor finished the article), which are typically interpreted by inferring a hidden event (e.g. reading) on the basis of contextual cues. This paper tackles the problem of logical metonymy interpretation, that is, the retrieval of the covert event via computational methods. We compare different types of models, including the probabilistic and the distributional ones previously introduced in the literature on the topic. For the first time, we also tested on this task some of the recent Transformer-based models, such as BERT, RoBERTa, XLNet, and GPT-2. Our results show a complex scenario, in which the best Transformer-based models and some traditional distributional models perform very similarly. However, the low performance on some of the testing datasets suggests that logical metonymy is still a challenging phenomenon for computational modeling.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">rambelli-etal-2020-comparing</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.aacl-main.26</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2020-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>224</start>
<end>234</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Comparing Probabilistic, Distributional and Transformer-Based Models on Logical Metonymy Interpretation
%A Rambelli, Giulia
%A Chersoni, Emmanuele
%A Lenci, Alessandro
%A Blache, Philippe
%A Huang, Chu-Ren
%Y Wong, Kam-Fai
%Y Knight, Kevin
%Y Wu, Hua
%S Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 10th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing
%D 2020
%8 December
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Suzhou, China
%F rambelli-etal-2020-comparing
%X In linguistics and cognitive science, Logical metonymies are defined as type clashes between an event-selecting verb and an entity-denoting noun (e.g. The editor finished the article), which are typically interpreted by inferring a hidden event (e.g. reading) on the basis of contextual cues. This paper tackles the problem of logical metonymy interpretation, that is, the retrieval of the covert event via computational methods. We compare different types of models, including the probabilistic and the distributional ones previously introduced in the literature on the topic. For the first time, we also tested on this task some of the recent Transformer-based models, such as BERT, RoBERTa, XLNet, and GPT-2. Our results show a complex scenario, in which the best Transformer-based models and some traditional distributional models perform very similarly. However, the low performance on some of the testing datasets suggests that logical metonymy is still a challenging phenomenon for computational modeling.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.aacl-main.26
%P 224-234
Markdown (Informal)
[Comparing Probabilistic, Distributional and Transformer-Based Models on Logical Metonymy Interpretation](https://aclanthology.org/2020.aacl-main.26) (Rambelli et al., AACL 2020)
ACL