What can we learn about the racial gap in the presence of sample selection?
Esfandiar Maasoumi and
Le Wang
Journal of Econometrics, 2017, vol. 199, issue 2, 117-130
Abstract:
We examine the distance and relations between the distributions of wages for two exogenously identified groups (black and white women here). The literature commonly employs decomposition methods for the conditional means, to propose explanations for observed wage differentials, as “structural” components, attributable to difference in market structures, and the “composition” components, attributable to difference in characteristics and skills. Estimation of these components is often hampered by restrictive wage structure assumptions, and sample selection issues (wages are only observed for those working). We address these issues by first utilizing modern strategies in the treatment effects literature to identify the entire distributions of wages and counterfactual wages among working women, which afford a separation of composition and market effects. We avoid restrictive wage structure modeling by nonparametric inverse probability weighting methods. This approach allows for decomposition beyond the gap at the mean, and can deliver distributional statistics of interest, such as inequalities and target quantiles. Accounting for selection, we extend the basic framework to provide a computationally convenient way to identify bounds on the decomposed components for the whole population. We employ these methods to understand the sources and dynamics of the racial gap in the U.S. Our analysis reveals that what may be learned about the racial gap is impacted by labor force participation, and is also sensitive to the choice of population of interest. Our results question what may be gleaned from the commonly reported point estimates when sample selection is neglected.
Keywords: Decomposition; Distributional analysis; Racial wage gap; Sample selection; Partial identification; Treatment effects; Women (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C13 C14 C21 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407617300660
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:econom:v:199:y:2017:i:2:p:117-130
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2017.05.004
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Econometrics is currently edited by T. Amemiya, A. R. Gallant, J. F. Geweke, C. Hsiao and P. M. Robinson
More articles in Journal of Econometrics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().