Substructure search

Substructure search (SSS) is a method to retrieve from a database only those chemicals matching a pattern of atoms and bonds which a user specifies. It is an application of graph theory, specifically subgraph matching in which the query is a hydrogen-depleted molecular graph. The mathematical foundations for the method were laid in the 1870s, when it was suggested that chemical structure drawings were equivalent to graphs with atoms as vertices and bonds as edges. SSS is now a standard part of cheminformatics and is widely used by pharmaceutical chemists in drug discovery.

There are many commercial systems that provide SSS, typically having a graphical user interface and chemical drawing software. Large publicly-available databases like PubChem and ChemSpider can be searched this way, as can Wikipedia's articles describing individual chemicals.

Substructure search is used to retrieve from a database of chemicals those which contain the pattern of atoms and bonds specified by a user. It is implemented using a specialist type of query language and in real-world applications the search may be further constrained using logical operators on additional data held in the database. Thus "return all carboxylic acids where a sample of >1 g is available".^[1][2] One definition of "substructure" was provided in 2008: "given two chemical structures A and B, if structure A is fully contained in structure B, then A is a substructure of B, while B is a superstructure of A."^[3]

In this definition, the word "structure" is not synonymous with "compound". If it were, the structure for ethanol, CH₃CH₂OH would not be a substructure of propanol, CH₃CH₂CH₂OH, since the terminal CH₃ of ethanol is not fully contained at the propanol chain two atoms away from the OH group. Instead the query structure is, formally, a hydrogen-depleted molecular graph. The search is thus for substances which contain three atoms and two single bonds connected as C–C–O. Propanol is a "hit", as is diethyl ether, with C–C–O–C–C. If a user wished to limit the hits to alcohols, then the query structure would have to be drawn with an "explicit hydrogen", as C–C–O–H and ether would no longer match.^[1] In mathematical terms, finding substructures is an application of graph theory, specifically subgraph matching.^[5]

Most substructure search systems present the user with a graphical user interface with a chemical structure drawing component. Query structures may contain bonding patterns such as "single/aromatic" or "any" to provide flexibility. Similarly, the vertices which in an actual compound would be a specific atom may be replaced with an atom list in the query. Cis–trans isomerism at double bonds is catered for by giving a choice of retrieving only the E form, the Z form, or both.^[1][15]

The algorithms for searching are computationally intensive, often of O (n³) or O (n⁴) time complexity (where n is the number of atoms involved) but the problem is known to be NP-complete.^[16] Speedups are achieved using fragment screening as a first step. This pre-computation typically involves creation of bitstrings representing presence or absence of molecular fragments. Target compounds that do not possess the fragments present in the query cannot be hits and are eliminated.^[17][18] Atom-by-atom-searching, in which a mapping of the query's atoms and bonds with the target molecule is sought, is usually done with a variant of the Ullman algorithm.^[5][19]

As of 2024^[update], substructure search is a standard feature in chemical databases accessible via the web. Large databases such as PubChem,^[20][15] maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information and ChemSpider,^[21] maintained by the Royal Society of Chemistry have graphical interfaces for search. The Chemical Abstracts Service, a division of the American Chemical Society, provides tools to search the chemical literature and Reaxys supplied by Elsevier covers both chemicals and reaction information, including that originally held in the Beilstein database.^[22] PATENTSCOPE maintained by the World Intellectual Property Organization makes chemical patents accessible by substructure^[23] and Wikipedia's articles describing individual chemicals can also be searched that way.^[24]

Suppliers of chemicals as synthesis intermediates or for high-throughput screening routinely provide search interfaces. Currently, the largest database that can be freely searched by the public is the ZINC database, which is claimed to contain over 37 billion commercially available molecules.^[25][26]

The idea that chemical structures as depicted using drawings of the type introduced by Kekulé were related to what is now called graph theory was suggested by the mathematician J. J. Sylvester in 1878. He was the first to use the word "graph" in the sense of a network.^[27][28] Arthur Cayley had already, in 1874, considered how to enumerate chemical isomers, in what was an early approach to molecular graphs, where atoms are at vertices and bonds correspond to edges.^[29][30]

In the 20th century, chemists developed standard ways to show structural formula, especially for individual organic compounds that were increasingly being synthesized and tested as potential drugs or agrochemicals,^[32][6] By the 1950s, as the number of compounds made and tested grew, the first attempts to create chemical databases were made and the sub-discipline of cheminformatics was established.^[33] As stated in 2012, "searching for substructures in molecules belongs to the most elementary tasks in cheminformatics and is nowadays part of virtually every cheminformatics software".^[34]

The first suggested use for substructure search was in 1957, to reduce the workload of patent examiners. They have to search published literature to decide whether an invention is novel, which for chemical patents often means finding known examples within the generic claims of a Markush structure.^[35][33] Before this could become a reality, a number of developments were required. Importantly, the existing literature had to be made searchable and a way to input a chemical structure query and return the matching results had to devised. These requirements had been partially met as early as 1881 when Friedrich Konrad Beilstein introduced the Handbuch der organischen Chemie (Handbook of Organic Chemistry) which carefully classified known chemicals in a very systematic manner so that all examples containing a given heterocycle would be located together.^[36][37]

In 1907, the American Chemical Society set up the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS). This weekly subscription service included a printed publication with summaries of articles in thousands of scholarly journals and claims in worldwide patents. This had a chemical substance index that, in principle, allowed searching by chemical name or formula.^[38] However, it was only when the CAS records had been fully converted into machine-readable form and the internet was available to connect its database to end-users that comprehensive searching became possible. CAS provided various specialist search services from the 1980s but it was not until 2008 that its "SciFinder" system became available via the web.^[39]

By the 1960s, companies synthesizing and testing new chemicals made significant progress in creating in-house databases. Imperial Chemical Industries stored chemical structures encoded as text strings, using Wiswesser line notation. Its associated CROSSBOW software allowed substructure search using key-based searches followed by more processor-intensive atom-by-atom search.^[40][41] It was recognised that research chemists wanted not only to search company collections for existing inventory but also to search third-party databases supplied by vendors of small-molecule intermediates. The latter application evolved as a collaboration involving six companies with pharmaceutical interests and their commercial suppliers.^[42][9]

By the 1980s, other line notations were used for commercially-available substructure search systems. SMILES encoding, together with its SMARTS query language,^[43] and SYBYL line notation^[9][44] are examples.^[45] A comprehensive survey of then-available chemical information systems was produced for NASA in 1985.^[46]

The need to combine chemistry search with biological data produced by screening compounds at ever-larger scales led to implementation of systems such as MACCS.^{[46]: 73–77 [47]} This commercial system from MDL Information Systems made use of an algorithm specifically designed for storage and search within groups of chemicals that differed only in their stereochemistry.^[48] A review of the many systems available by the mid-1980s pointed out that "most in-house developed systems have been replaced with commercially available standardised software for managing chemical structure databases."^[49] The MDL Molfile is now an open file format for storing single-molecule data in the form of a connection table.^[50][9]

By the 2000s, personal computers had become powerful enough that storage and search of chemistry within office software such as Microsoft Excel was possible.^[51]

Subsequent developments involved the use of new techniques to allow efficient searches over very large databases and, importantly, the use of a standardised International Chemical Identifier, a type of line notation, to uniquely define a chemical substance.^{[9][25][52][53]}

• Molecule mining