Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Two waves of massive stars running away from the young cluster R136

Abstract

Massive stars are predominantly born in stellar associations or clusters1. Their radiation fields, stellar winds and supernovae strongly impact their local environment. In the first few million years of a cluster’s life, massive stars are dynamically ejected and run away from the cluster at high speed2. However, the production rate of dynamically ejected runaways is poorly constrained. Here we report on a sample of 55 massive runaway stars ejected from the young cluster R136 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. An astrometric analysis of Gaia data3,4,5 reveals two channels of dynamically ejected runaways. The first channel ejects massive stars in all directions and is consistent with dynamical interactions during and after the birth of R136. The second channel launches stars in a preferred direction and may be related to a cluster interaction. We found that 23–33% of the most luminous stars initially born in R136 are runaways. Model predictions2,6,7 have significantly underestimated the dynamical escape fraction of massive stars. Consequently, their role in shaping and heating the interstellar and galactic media and their role in driving galactic outflows are far more important than previously thought8,9.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: On-sky distribution of runaways from R136 in the last 3 Myr.
Fig. 2: Ejection angle and kinematic age distribution of runaways from R136 in the last 3 Myr.
Fig. 3: Kinematic age and transverse velocity distribution of runaways from R136 in the last 3 Myr.
Fig. 4: Distribution of the runaways’ evolutionary age and kinematic age.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during or analysed during the current study are available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10058762)54.

Code availability

The software and code described in this paper and used to produce the findings are available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10058762)54.

References

  1. de Wit, W. J., Testi, L., Palla, F. & Zinnecker, H. The origin of massive O-type field stars. II. Field O stars as runaways. Astron. Astrophys. 437, 247–255 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujii, M. S. & Portegies Zwart, S. The origin of OB runaway stars. Science 334, 1380–1383 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaia Collaboration. The Gaia mission. Astron. Astrophys. 595, A1 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaia Collaboration. Gaia Early Data Release 3. Summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 649, A1 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaia Collaboration et al. Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 674, A1 (2023).

  6. Banerjee, S., Kroupa, P. & Oh, S. Runaway massive stars from R136: VFTS 682 is very likely a ‘slow runaway’. Astrophys. J. 746, 15 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oh, S., Kroupa, P. & Pflamm-Altenburg, J. Dependency of dynamical ejections of O stars on the masses of very young star clusters. Astrophys. J. 805, 92 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson, E. P., Agertz, O. & Renaud, F. How runaway stars boost galactic outflows. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 494, 3328–3341 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Steinwandel, U. P., Bryan, G. L., Somerville, R. S., Hayward, C. C. & Burkhart, B. On the impact of runaway stars on dwarf galaxies with resolved interstellar medium. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 1408–1427 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schneider, F. R. N. et al. An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst. Science 359, 69–71 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans, C. J. et al. A massive runaway star from 30 Doradus. Astrophys. J. Lett. 715, 74–79 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lennon, D. J. et al. Gaia DR2 reveals a very massive runaway star ejected from R136. Astron. Astrophys. 619, A78 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sana, H. et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula survey. Observational evidence for two distinct populations of massive runaway stars in 30 Doradus. Astron. Astrophys. 668, L5 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oh, S. & Kroupa, P. Dynamical ejections of massive stars from young star clusters under diverse initial conditions. Astron. Astrophys. 590, A107 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maíz Apellániz, J., Pantaleoni González, M., Barbá, R. H. & Weiler, M. Escape from the Bermuda cluster: orphanization by multiple stellar ejections. Astron. Astrophys. 657, A72 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stoop, M. et al. The early evolution of young massive clusters. II. The kinematic history of NGC 6618/M 17. Astron. Astrophys. 681, A21 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brands, S. A. et al. The R136 star cluster dissected with Hubble Space Telescope/STIS. III. The most massive stars and their clumped winds. Astron. Astrophys. 663, A36 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Crowther, P. A. et al. The R136 star cluster hosts several stars whose individual masses greatly exceed the accepted 150 Msolar stellar mass limit. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 408, 731–751 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bestenlehner, J. M. et al. The R136 star cluster dissected with Hubble Space Telescope/STIS. II. Physical properties of the most massive stars in R136. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499, 1918–1936 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabbi, E. et al. A double cluster at the core of 30 Doradus. Astrophys. J. Lett. 754, L37 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bestenlehner, J. M. et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula survey. XVII. Physical and wind properties of massive stars at the top of the main sequence. Astron. Astrophys. 570, A38 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Crowther, P. A. et al. The R136 star cluster dissected with Hubble Space Telescope/STIS. I. Far-ultraviolet spectroscopic census and the origin of He ii λ1640 in young star clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 624–659 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramírez-Tannus, M. C. et al. A relation between the radial velocity dispersion of young clusters and their age. Evidence for hardening as the formation scenario of massive close binaries. Astron. Astrophys. 645, L10 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Salpeter, E. E. The luminosity function and stellar evolution. Astrophys. J. 121, 161 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Doran, E. I. et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula survey. XI. A census of the hot luminous stars and their feedback in 30 Doradus. Astron. Astrophys. 558, A134 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Barkana, R. & Loeb, A. In the beginning: the first sources of light and the reionization of the Universe. Phys. Rep. 349, 125–238 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wise, J. H. & Cen, R. Ionizing photon escape fractions from high-redshift dwarf galaxies. Astrophys. J. 693, 984–999 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Atek, H. et al. Most of the photons that reionized the Universe came from dwarf galaxies. Nature 626, 975–978 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Razoumov, A. O. & Sommer-Larsen, J. Modeling Lyman continuum emission from young galaxies. Astrophys. J. 668, 674–681 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Conroy, C. & Kratter, K. M. Runaway stars and the escape of ionizing radiation from high-redshift galaxies. Astrophys. J. 755, 123 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pietrzyński, G. et al. A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent. Nature 567, 200–203 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindegren, L. et al. Gaia Early Data Release 3. Parallax bias versus magnitude, colour, and position. Astron. Astrophys. 649, A4 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lindegren, L. Re-normalising the astrometric chi-square in Gaia DR2. Report No. GAIA-C3-TN-LU-LL-124 (Gaia Collaboration, Semantic Scholar, 2018).

  34. Pecaut, M. J. & Mamajek, E. E. Intrinsic colors, temperatures, and bolometric corrections of pre-main-sequence stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 208, 9 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hénault-Brunet, V. et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula survey. VII. A low velocity dispersion for the young massive cluster R136. Astron. Astrophys. 546, A73 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Portegies Zwart, S. F., McMillan, S. L. W. & Gieles, M. Young massive star clusters. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48, 431–493 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Skrutskie, M. F. et al. The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). Astron. J. 131, 1163–1183 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bestenlehner, J. M. et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. III. A very massive star in apparent isolation from the massive cluster R136. Astron. Astrophys. 530, L14 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Renzo, M. et al. Space astrometry of the very massive ~150 M candidate runaway star VFTS682. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 482, 102–106 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brands, S. A. et al. Extinction towards the cluster R136 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. An extinction law from the near-infrared to the ultraviolet. Astron. Astrophys. 673, A132 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tehrani, K. A. et al. Weighing Melnick 34: the most massive binary system known. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 2692–2710 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schnurr, O., Moffat, A. F. J., St-Louis, N., Morrell, N. I. & Guerrero, M. A. A spectroscopic survey of WNL stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud: general properties and binary status. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 389, 806–828 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shenar, T. et al. The Wolf–Rayet binaries of the nitrogen sequence in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Spectroscopy, orbital analysis, formation, and evolution. Astron. Astrophys. 627, A151 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Castro, N. et al. Mapping the core of the Tarantula nebula with VLT-MUSE. I. Spectral and nebular content around R136. Astron. Astrophys. 614, A147 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sana, H. et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula survey. VIII. Multiplicity properties of the O-type star population. Astron. Astrophys. 550, A107 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mahy, L. et al. The Tarantula massive binary monitoring. III. Atmosphere analysis of double-lined spectroscopic systems. Astron. Astrophys. 634, A118 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Shenar, T. et al. The Tarantula massive binary monitoring. V. R 144: a wind-eclipsing binary with a total mass 140 M. Astron. Astrophys. 650, A147 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sabín-Sanjulián, C. et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula survey. XXVI. Properties of the O-dwarf population in 30 Doradus. Astron. Astrophys. 601, A79 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. McEvoy, C. M. et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. XIX. B-type supergiants: atmospheric parameters and nitrogen abundances to investigate the role of binarity and the width of the main sequence. Astron. Astrophys. 575, A70 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Evans, C. J., van Loon, J. T., Hainich, R. & Bailey, M. 2dF-AAOmega spectroscopy of massive stars in the Magellanic Clouds. The north-eastern region of the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 584, A5 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Walborn, N. R., Lennon, D. J., Haser, S. M., Kudritzki, R.-P. & Voels, S. A. The physics of massive OB stars in different parent galaxies. I. Ultraviolet and optical spectral morphology in the Magellanic Clouds. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 107, 104 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Walborn, N. R. et al. A CNO dichotomy among O2 giant spectra in the Magellanic Clouds. Astrophys. J. 608, 1028–1038 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Carretero-Castrillo, M., Ribó, M. & Paredes, J. M. Galactic runaway O and Be stars found using Gaia DR3. Astron. Astrophys. 679, A109 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Stoop, M. et al. Reproduction package for the paper ‘Two waves of massive stars running away from the young cluster R136’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10058762 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank F. Backs, O. Ould-Boukattine, J. Hessels, D. Linssen and M. Snelders for their help and discussions. M.S. acknowledges support from NOVA. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 772225: MULTIPLES). This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency’s mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), which were processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the consortium was provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia multilateral agreement. This publication makes use of data products from 2MASS, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology and is funded by NASA and the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.S. led the runaway search and data analysis, produced all the figures and tables, and was the main contributor to the text. A.d.K. and L.K. contributed to the scientific interpretation, context and text. S.B. contributed to the results, implications and text. S.P.Z. and H.S. contributed to the scientific interpretation, implications and context. F.S. contributed to the statistical interpretation. All other authors contributed towards the discussion and provided feedback on the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitchel Stoop.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Sara Berlanas and Elena Sabbi for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Proper motion of stars relative to R136 in the field in and around R136 with reliable astrometry.

The blue stars represent the runaways coming from R136 found in this work, while the grey stars do not originate in R136. The stars with reliable astrometry are defined in Section 1. The proper motion of R136 found in Section 1 has been subtracted and is \({\mu }_{{\alpha }^{* },{\rm{R}}136}\) = 1.654 mas yr−1 and μδ,R136 = 0.573 mas yr−1. The black circle is centred on R136 and has a radius of 2.0 pc. The dashed black rectangle depicts the region used to derive the colour-magnitude-diagram of the north-east cluster in20. The background image is taken by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2.2m telescope (image credit: NASA, ESA and D. Lennon et al., 2012).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Near-infrared (2MASS) colour-colour diagram of the runaway candidates.

They are coloured according to their Gaia colour GBp − GRp. The location of an O-type (< O9 V), B2 V, and M0 V star on the zero-age-main-sequence in this diagram are indicated with the black circles34. The location of main-sequence stars with spectral types between O9 V and M0 V are represented by the grey curve. The reddening lines for the O9 and M0 dwarf star are given with the black dashed lines. The reddened WN5h star VFTS 682 is shown with the open blue star. Stars in the grey shaded region in the upper left corner are excluded from the final runaway sample as they are consistent with late-type stars. The uncertainty on the data is given as a 1σ confidence interval.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Gaia colour magnitude diagram (CMD) of the runaway candidates.

Stars with blue circles and red squares were included and excluded, respectively, based on Extended Data Fig. 2. Parsec reddening lines are shown for a 10, 16, 30, 60, and 100 M star with the grey dots denoting AV equal to 0.0 to 5.0 mag in steps of 1.0 mag (RV = 3.1) for an age = 1.8 Myr. The relatively reddened WN5h star VFTS 682 is shown with the open blue star. The open yellow circles are included in the final runaway sample on the basis of their relatively blue colour. The open purple square is excluded based on its relatively red colour. The star located in the upper right is the red supergiant MH 18 that could be a massive runaway star.

Extended Data Fig. 4 On-sky distribution of the most luminous stars (log[L/L]  > 6.0) in R136 and 30 Doradus.

Arrows depict the transverse motion direction and the length of the arrows are proportional to the transverse velocity with respect to R136. Blue circles depict runaways coming from R136, red crosses denote stars which are classified as member of R136 (rproj  < 10 pc), and green squares indicate stars which are neither runaways originating from R136 nor member of R136. The foreground image is a composite image from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2.2m telescope (image credit: NASA, ESA D. Lennon et al., 2012). The background shows a near-infrared image of the Tarantula Nebula produced by the ESO Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA, credit: ESO/M.-R. Cioni/VISTA Magellanic Cloud survey).

Extended Data Table 1 Astrometric, kinematic, and physical parameters of R136
Extended Data Table 2 All stars in 30 Doradus with log(L/L) > 6.0

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text, Supplementary Figs. 1–9, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary references.

Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stoop, M., de Koter, A., Kaper, L. et al. Two waves of massive stars running away from the young cluster R136. Nature 634, 809–812 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08013-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08013-8

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing