Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Proximate spin liquid and fractionalization in the triangular antiferromagnet KYbSe2

Nature Physics volume 20, pages 74–81 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The Heisenberg triangular-lattice quantum spin liquid and its phase transitions to nearby magnetic orders have received much theoretical attention, but clear experimental manifestations of these states are rare. Here we demonstrate that a spin-half delafossite material, namely, KYbSe2, shows close proximity to the triangular-lattice Heisenberg quantum spin liquid. Using neutron scattering, we identify a diffuse continuum with a sharp lower bound within the measured spectra. Applying entanglement witnesses to the data indicates multipartite entanglement spread between its neighbours, and an analysis of its magnetic-exchange couplings reveals close proximity to the theoretical quantum spin-liquid phase. The key features of the data are reproduced by Schwinger boson theory and tensor network calculations with a substantial next-nearest-neighbour coupling. The strength of the dynamical structure factor at the Brillouin-zone K point shows a scaling collapse down to 0.3 K, indicating the existence of a second-order quantum phase transition. Comparing this with previous theoretical work suggests that the proximate phase at a larger next-nearest-neighbour coupling is a gapped \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) spin liquid, resolving a long-debated issue.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Crystal structure and phase diagram of KYbSe2.
Fig. 2: Neutron spectrum of KYbSe2 at 0.3, 1.0 and 2.0 K.
Fig. 3: CEF spectrum of KYbSe2.
Fig. 4: KYbSe2 entanglement witnesses.
Fig. 5: Comparison between experimental KYbSe2 scattering and theoretical simulations.
Fig. 6: Critical scaling in KYbSe2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the plotted experimental data are publicly available at https://doi.org/10.14461/oncat.data.64bed7e0fd6850c0afce4da2/1995350. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Knolle, J. & Moessner, R. A field guide to spin liquids. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 451–472 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Broholm, C. et al. Quantum spin liquids. Science 367, eaay0668 (2020).

  3. Savary, L. & Balents, L. Quantum spin liquids: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou, Y., Kanoda, K. & Ng, T.-K. Quantum spin liquid states. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025003 (2017).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Tokura, Y., Kawasaki, M. & Nagaosa, N. Emergent functions of quantum materials. Nat. Phys. 13, 1056–1068 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamashita, S. et al. Thermodynamic properties of a spin-1/2 spin-liquid state in a κ-type organic salt. Nat. Phys. 4, 459–462 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Itou, T., Oyamada, A., Maegawa, S., Tamura, M. & Kato, R. Quantum spin liquid in the spin-1/2 triangular antiferromagnet EtMe3Sb[Pd(dmit)2]2. Phys. Rev. B 77, 104413 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Han, T.-H. et al. Fractionalized excitations in the spin-liquid state of a kagome-lattice antiferromagnet. Nature 492, 406–410 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaudet, J. et al. Quantum spin ice dynamics in the dipole-octupole pyrochlore magnet Ce2Zr2O7. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 187201 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, B. et al. Experimental signatures of a three-dimensional quantum spin liquid in effective spin-1/2 Ce2Zr2O7 pyrochlore. Nat. Phys. 15, 1052–1057 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson, P. W. Resonating valence bonds: a new kind of insulator? Mater. Res. Bull. 8, 153–160 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. White, S. R. & Chernyshev, A. L. Neél order in square and triangular lattice Heisenberg models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 127004 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu, Z. & White, S. R. Spin liquid phase of the \(s=\frac{1}{2}{J}_{1}-{J}_{2}\) Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. B 92, 041105 (2015).

  14. Hu, W.-J., Gong, S.-S., Zhu, W. & Sheng, D. N. Competing spin-liquid states in the spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\) Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. B 92, 140403 (2015).

  15. Iqbal, Y., Hu, W.-J., Thomale, R., Poilblanc, D. & Becca, F. Spin liquid nature in the Heisenberg J1−J2 triangular antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 93, 144411 (2016).

  16. Saadatmand, S. N. & McCulloch, I. P. Symmetry fractionalization in the topological phase of the spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\)J1−J2 triangular Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. B 94, 121111 (2017).

  17. Wietek, A. & Läuchli, A. M. Chiral spin liquid and quantum criticality in extended \(s=\frac{1}{2}\) Heisenberg models on the triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. B 95, 035141 (2017).

  18. Gong, S.-S., Zhu, W., Zhu, J.-X., Sheng, D. N. & Yang, K. Global phase diagram and quantum spin liquids in a spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\) triangular antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 96, 075116 (2017).

  19. Hu, S., Zhu, W., Eggert, S. & He, Y.-C. Dirac spin liquid on the spin-1/2 triangular Heisenberg antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 207203 (2019).

  20. Zhu, Z., Maksimov, P. A., White, S. R. & Chernyshev, A. L. Topography of spin liquids on a triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 207203 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding, L. et al. Gapless spin-liquid state in the structurally disorder-free triangular antiferromagnet NaYbO2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 144432 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bordelon, M. M. et al. Field-tunable quantum disordered ground state in the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet NaYbO2. Nat. Phys. 15, 1058–1064 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ranjith, K. M. et al. Field-induced instability of the quantum spin liquid ground state in the \({J}_{{{{\rm{eff}}}}}=\frac{1}{2}\) triangular-lattice compound NaYbO2. Phys. Rev. B 99, 180401 (2019).

  24. Baenitz, M. et al. NaYbS2: a planar spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\) triangular-lattice magnet and putative spin liquid. Phys. Rev. B 98, 220409 (2018).

  25. Sarkar, R. et al. Quantum spin liquid ground state in the disorder free triangular lattice NaYbS2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 241116 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ranjith, K. M. et al. Anisotropic field-induced ordering in the triangular-lattice quantum spin liquid NaYbSe2. Phys. Rev. B 100, 224417 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dai, P.-L. et al. Spinon Fermi surface spin liquid in a triangular lattice antiferromagnet NaYbSe2. Phys. Rev. X 11, 021044 (2021).

  28. Xie, T. et al. Field-induced spin excitations in the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice antiferromagnet CsYbSe2. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.12451 (2021).

  29. Zhang, S., Changlani, H. J., Plumb, K. W., Tchernyshyov, O. & Moessner, R. Dynamical structure factor of the three-dimensional quantum spin liquid candidate NaCaNi2F7. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 167203 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu, Z., Maksimov, P. A., White, S. R. & Chernyshev, A. L. Disorder-induced mimicry of a spin liquid in YbMgGaO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 157201 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Xing, J., Sanjeewa, L. D., May, A. F. & Sefat, A. S. Synthesis and anisotropic magnetism in quantum spin liquid candidates AYbSe2 (A = K and Rb). APL Mater. 9, 111104 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Scheie, A. et al. Witnessing entanglement in quantum magnets using neutron scattering. Phys. Rev. B 103, 224434 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ehlers, G., Podlesnyak, A. A., Niedziela, J. L., Iverson, E. B. & Sokol, P. E. The new cold neutron chopper spectrometer at the Spallation Neutron Source: design and performance. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 085108 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mason, T. E. et al. The Spallation Neutron Source in Oak Ridge: a powerful tool for materials research. Phys. B 385, 955–960 (2006).

  35. Macdougal, D. et al. Avoided quasiparticle decay and enhanced excitation continuum in the spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\) near-Heisenberg triangular antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9. Phys. Rev. B 102, 064421 (2020).

  36. Zhou, H. D. et al. Successive phase transitions and extended spin-excitation continuum in the \(s=\frac{1}{2}\) triangular-lattice antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 267206 (2012).

  37. Ito, S. et al. Structure of the magnetic excitations in the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9. Nat. Commun. 8, 235 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ma, J. et al. Static and dynamical properties of the spin-1/2 equilateral triangular-lattice antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 087201 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zheng, W., Fjærestad, J. O., Singh, R. R. P., McKenzie, R. H. & Coldea, R. Excitation spectra of the spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\) triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 74, 224420 (2006).

  40. Starykh, O. A., Chubukov, A. V. & Abanov, A. G. Flat spin-wave dispersion in a triangular antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 74, 180403 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chernyshev, A. L. & Zhitomirsky, M. E. Spin waves in a triangular lattice antiferromagnet: decays, spectrum renormalization, and singularities. Phys. Rev. B 79, 144416 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Laurell, P. et al. Quantifying and controlling entanglement in the quantum magnet Cs2CoCl4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 037201 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lake, B. et al. Multispinon continua at zero and finite temperature in a near-ideal Heisenberg chain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 137205 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Plumb, K. W. et al. Continuum of quantum fluctuations in a three-dimensional s = 1 Heisenberg magnet. Nat. Phys. 15, 54–59 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shen, Y. et al. Evidence for a spinon fermi surface in a triangular-lattice quantum-spin-liquid candidate. Nature 540, 559–562 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Paddison, J. A. M. et al. Continuous excitations of the triangular-lattice quantum spin liquid YbMgGaO4. Nat. Phys. 13, 117–122 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Abernathy, D. L. et al. Design and operation of the wide angular-range chopper spectrometer ARCS at the Spallation Neutron Source. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 015114 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Scheie, A. PyCrystalField: software for calculation, analysis and fitting of crystal electric field Hamiltonians. J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 356–362 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wootters, W. K. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245–2248 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Coffman, V., Kundu, J. & Wootters, W. K. Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Roscilde, T., Verrucchi, P., Fubini, A., Haas, S. & Tognetti, V. Studying quantum spin systems through entanglement estimators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 167203 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Amico, L. et al. Divergence of the entanglement range in low-dimensional quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 74, 022322 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hauke, P., Heyl, M., Tagliacozzo, L. & Zoller, P. Measuring multipartite entanglement through dynamic susceptibilities. Nat. Phys. 12, 778–782 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Osborne, T. J. & Verstraete, F. General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 220503 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Baskaran, G., Mandal, S. & Shankar, R. Exact results for spin dynamics and fractionalization in the Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 247201 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Paddison, J. A. M. Scattering signatures of bond-dependent magnetic interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 247202 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Huberman, T., Tennant, D. A., Cowley, R. A., Coldea, R. & Frost, C. D. A study of the quantum classical crossover in the spin dynamics of the 2D s = 5/2 antiferromagnet Rb2MnF4: neutron scattering, computer simulations and analytic theories. J. Stat. Mech. 2008, P05017 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Arovas, D. P. & Auerbach, A. Functional integral theories of low-dimensional quantum Heisenberg models. Phys. Rev. B 38, 316–332 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Auerbach, A. Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism (Springer-Verlag, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  60. Ghioldi, E. A. et al. Dynamical structure factor of the triangular antiferromagnet: Schwinger boson theory beyond mean field. Phys. Rev. B 98, 184403 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ferrari, F. & Becca, F. Dynamical structure factor of the J1−J2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice: magnons, spinons, and gauge fields. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031026 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lake, B., Tennant, D. A., Frost, C. D. & Nagler, S. E. Quantum criticality and universal scaling of a quantum antiferromagnet. Nat. Mater. 4, 329–334 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Schröder, A. et al. Onset of antiferromagnetism in heavy-fermion metals. Nature 407, 351–355 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. Chakravarty, S., Halperin, B. I. & Nelson, D. R. Two-dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet at low temperatures. Phys. Rev. B 39, 2344–2371 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Sachdev, S. & Ye, J. Universal quantum-critical dynamics of two-dimensional antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2411–2414 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. Sachdev, S. Kagomé- and triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnets: ordering from quantum fluctuations and quantum-disordered ground states with unconfined bosonic spinons. Phys. Rev. B 45, 12377–12396 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang, F. & Vishwanath, A. Spin-liquid states on the triangular and kagomé lattices: a projective-symmetry-group analysis of Schwinger boson states. Phys. Rev. B 74, 174423 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. Azaria, P., Delamotte, B. & Jolicoeur, T. Nonuniversality in helical and canted-spin systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3175–3178 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Chubukov, A. V., Sachdev, S. & Senthil, T. Quantum phase transitions in frustrated quantum antiferromagnets. Nucl. Phys. B 426, 601–643 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. Jia, Y.-T. et al. Mott transition and superconductivity in quantum spin liquid candidate NaYbSe2. Chinese Phys. Lett. 37, 097404 (2020).

  71. Zhang, Z. et al. Pressure induced metallization and possible unconventional superconductivity in spin liquid NaYbSe2. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.11479 (2020).

  72. Brown, P. J. Magnetic form factors. The Cambridge Crystallographic Subroutine Library; https://www.ill.eu/sites/ccsl/ffacts/ (1998).

  73. James, F. & Roos, M. Minuit—a system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations. Comp. Phys. Commun. 10, 343–367 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhang, S.-S. et al. Large-S limit of the large-N theory for the triangular antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 100, 104431 (2019).

  75. Szasz, A., Motruk, J., Zaletel, M. P. & Moore, J. E. Chiral spin liquid phase of the triangular lattice Hubbard model: a Density Matrix Renormalization Group study. Phys. Rev. X 10, 021042 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Schollwock, U. The Density-Matrix Renormalization Group in the age of matrix product states. Ann. Phys. 326, 96–192 (2011).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  77. Vanderstraeten, L., Haegeman, J. & Verstraete, F. Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states. SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.7 (2019).

  78. Fishman, M., White, S. R. & Stoudenmire, E. M. The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations. SciPost Phys. Codebases https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4 (2022).

  79. Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871 (1964).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  80. Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  81. Cohen, A. J., Mori-Sánchez, P. & Yang, W. Insights into current limitations of density functional theory. Science 321, 792–794 (2008).

  82. Duan, X. et al. Tunable electronic structure and topological properties of LnPn (Ln = Ce, Pr, Sm, Gd, Yb; Pn = Sb, Bi). Commun. Phys. 1, 71 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Seidl, A., Görling, A., Vogl, P., Majewski, J. A. & Levy, M. Generalized Kohn-Sham schemes and the band-gap problem. Phys. Rev. B 53, 3764–3774 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. Perdew, J. P. et al. Understanding band gaps of solids in generalized Kohn–Sham theory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2801–2806 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  85. Perdew, J. P. & Zunger, A. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048–5079 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. Sun, J., Ruzsinszky, A. & Perdew, J. P. Strongly constrained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. Anisimov, V. I., Aryasetiawan, F. & Lichtenstein, A. I. First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: the LDA+U method. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 9, 767–808 (1997).

  88. Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E. & Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207–8215 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  89. Deilynazar, N., Khorasani, E., Alaei, M. & Javad Hashemifar, S. First-principles insights into f magnetism: a case study on some magnetic pyrochlores. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 393, 127–131 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  90. Payne, A., Avedaño-Franco, G., He, X., Bousquet, E. & Romero, A. H. Optimizing the orbital occupation in the multiple minima problem of magnetic materials from the metaheuristic firefly algorithm. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 21932–21941 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Casadei, M., Ren, X., Rinke, P., Rubio, A. & Scheffler, M. Density-functional theory for f-electron systems: the α-γ phase transition in cerium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 146402 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  92. Payne, A., Avendaño-Franco, G., Bousquet, E. & Romero, A. H. Firefly algorithm applied to noncollinear magnetic phase materials prediction. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 4455–4466 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  94. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  96. Anisimov, V. I., Zaanen, J. & Andersen, O. K. Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I. Phys. Rev. B 44, 943–954 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. Schwarz, K., Blaha, P. & Madsen, G. K. H. Electronic structure calculations of solids using the WIEN2k package for material sciences. Comput. Phys. Commun. 147, 71–76 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  98. Pokharel, G. et al. Negative thermal expansion and magnetoelastic coupling in the breathing pyrochlore lattice material LiGaCr4S8. Phys. Rev. B 97, 134117 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  99. Pandey, T. & Parker, D. S. Borderline magnetism: how adding Mg to paramagnetic CeCo3 makes a 450-K ferromagnet with large magnetic anisotropy. Phys. Rev. Applied 10, 034038 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research used resources at the Spallation Neutron Source and High Flux Isotope Reactor, Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science User Facilities, operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The work by D.A.T., C.D.B. and E.A.G. is supported by the Quantum Science Center (QSC), a National Quantum Information Science Research Center of the US DOE. The work of J.A.M.P. (magnetic diffuse scattering fits) was supported by the US DOE, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. J.X. and A.S.S. were supported by the US DOE, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Science and Engineering Division. L.O.M. and A.E.T. were supported by CONICET under grant no. 364 (PIP2015). This research used resources at the Missouri University Research Reactor and the Department of Chemistry at the University of Missouri. S.L., A.J.W. and R.M. were supported by the US DOE, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, and Quantum Science Center. N.E.S., M.D., J.E.M., C.D.P. and T.P.D. were supported by the US DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231 (DE-AC02-76SF00515) through the Theory Institute for Materials and Energy Spectroscopy (TIMES). J.E.M. acknowledges additional support by a Simons Investigatorship. This research used the Lawrencium computational cluster resource provided by the IT Division at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (supported by the Director, US DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231). This research also used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a US DOE, Office of Science User Facility, operated under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. This paper has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US DOE. The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this paper, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. The US DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (https://www.energy.gov/doe-public-access-plan).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

    A. O. Scheie, D. Abernathy, D. M. Pajerowski & T. J. Williams

  2. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

    E. A. Ghioldi, C. D. Batista & D. A. Tennant

  3. Instituto de Física Rosario (CONICET) and Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina

    E. A. Ghioldi, L. O. Manuel & A. E. Trumper

  4. Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

    J. Xing, J. A. M. Paddison, A. S. Sefat & D. S. Parker

  5. Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

    N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont & J. E. Moore

  6. Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

    N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont & J. E. Moore

  7. University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR), Columbia, MO, USA

    L. D. Sanjeewa

  8. Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    L. D. Sanjeewa

  9. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA

    Sangyun Lee, A. J. Woods & R. Movshovich

  10. School of Physics and Astronomy and William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Shang-Shun Zhang

  11. Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford, CA, USA

    C. D. Pemmaraju & T. P. Devereaux

  12. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    T. P. Devereaux

  13. Shull Wollan Center—A Joint Institute for Neutron Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

    C. D. Batista & D. A. Tennant

Authors
  1. A. O. Scheie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. A. Ghioldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. A. M. Paddison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. E. Sherman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Dupont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. L. D. Sanjeewa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sangyun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. J. Woods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. D. Abernathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. D. M. Pajerowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. T. J. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Shang-Shun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. L. O. Manuel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. A. E. Trumper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. C. D. Pemmaraju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. A. S. Sefat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. D. S. Parker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. T. P. Devereaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. R. Movshovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. J. E. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. C. D. Batista
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. D. A. Tennant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.O.S. and D.A.T. conceived and coordinated the project. J.X., L.D.S. and A.S.S. synthesized and characterized the single-crystal KYbSe2 samples for experiments. A.O.S., D.A., D.M.P. and T.J.W. performed the neutron experiments, and A.O.S. analysed the neutron data and calculated the entanglement witnesses. J.A.M.P. performed the ORF fits. E.A.G., S.-S.Z., L.O.M., A.E.T. and C.D.B. carried out the SB calculations. N.E.S., M.D. and J.E.M. carried out the tensor network calculations of the dynamical structure factors. C.D.P., T.P.D. and D.S.P. carried out the DFT calculations. S.L., A.J.W. and R.M. performed the heat capacity measurements. A.O.S., N.E.S., M.D., J.E.M., C.D.B. and D.A.T. wrote the paper with input from all co-authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. O. Scheie or C. D. Batista.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks Romain Sibille and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 KYbSe2 sample mount.

KYbSe2 sample used to measure the low-energy spin excitations on CNCS. 20 crystals were coaligned and glued to two aluminum plates (top) which were then screwed to a copper rod (bottom). The different crystals are different shades of red because of their different thicknesses.

Extended Data Fig. 2 High resolution KYbSe2 scattering at (1/3,1/3,0).

Panel (a) shows a slice through the data showing the gapless dispersion. Panel (b) shows a 1D cut indicated by the faint vertical red bar in panel (a). Both plots show the dispersion to be gapless at 0.3 K to within 0.04 meV. Error bars indicate one standard deviation uncertainty.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 KYbSe2 background subtraction for CNCS data.

The top row shows the raw data at 0.3 K. The middle row shows the phenomenological background generated from the 12 K scattering data. The bottom row shows the data with the background subtracted, eliminating artifacts near Q = 0 and ℏω = 0.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Illustration of the geometry used and corresponding Brillouin zone for the tensor network simulations.

Panel a is a 6x6 lattice that we make a cylinder by identifying the top and bottom rows shown in red. Panel b is the Brillouin zone for this geometry, with the blue shaded region showing the allowed momenta, and the arrows show the path we take to generate Fig. (5e).

Extended Data Fig. 5 DFT electronic density of states in KYbSe2.

DFT electronic density of states in KYbSe2 calculated using the SCAN functional with an additional Hubbard-U correction of U = 8 eV on the Yb 5f states. The Fermi energy is set to 0 eV.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Sections I–VII and Figs. 1–11.

Supplementary Data 1

Source data for Supplementary Fig. 1.

Supplementary Data 2

Source data for Supplementary Fig. 2.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Source data for Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3

Source data for Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 4

Source data for Fig. 4.

Source Data Fig. 5

Source data for Fig. 5.

Source Data Fig. 6

Source data for Fig. 6.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Source data for Extended Data Fig. 2.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Source data for Extended Data Fig. 3.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Source data for Extended Data Fig. 5.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scheie, A.O., Ghioldi, E.A., Xing, J. et al. Proximate spin liquid and fractionalization in the triangular antiferromagnet KYbSe2. Nat. Phys. 20, 74–81 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02259-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02259-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing