Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = triality

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 492 KiB  
Article
Spin(8,C)-Higgs Bundles and the Hitchin Integrable System
by Álvaro Antón-Sancho
Mathematics 2024, 12(21), 3436; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12213436 - 3 Nov 2024
Viewed by 370
Abstract
Let M(Spin(8,C)) be the moduli space of Spin(8,C)-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface X of genus g2. This admits a system called the Hitchin integrable [...] Read more.
Let M(Spin(8,C)) be the moduli space of Spin(8,C)-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface X of genus g2. This admits a system called the Hitchin integrable system, induced by the Hitchin map, the fibers of which are Prym varieties. Moreover, the triality automorphism of Spin(8,C) acts on M(Spin(8,C)), and those Higgs bundles that admit a reduction in the structure group to G2 are fixed points of this action. This defines a map of moduli spaces of Higgs bundles M(G2)M(Spin(8,C)). In this work, the action of triality automorphism is extended to an action on the Hitchin integrable system associated with M(Spin(8,C)). In particular, it is checked that the map M(G2)M(Spin(8,C)) is restricted to a map at the level of the Prym varieties induced by the Hitchin map. Necessary and sufficient conditions are also provided for the Prym varieties associated with the moduli spaces of G2 and Spin(8,C)-Higgs bundles to be disconnected. Finally, some consequences are drawn from the above results in relation to the geometry of the Prym varieties involved. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dynkin diagram of the simple Lie group <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Spin</mo> <mo>(</mo> <mn>8</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, where the nodes of the diagram correspond to the vectorial representation <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mn>8</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> and the spinor representations <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msub> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mo>−</mo> </msub> </semantics></math> of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Spin</mo> <mo>(</mo> <mn>8</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, corresponding to the two types of spinors in dimension 8, known as Weyl spinors (which are 8-dimensional and interchanged by the action of the triality automorphism) and the adjoint representation Ad (which is 28-dimensional and fixed by the action of triality) [<a href="#B30-mathematics-12-03436" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. The figure is original and was made using Microsoft Word<sup>®</sup> v. 2409.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Action of triality on a fiber of the Hitchin map of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">M</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mo>Spin</mo> <mo>(</mo> <mn>8</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>. In blue is an orbit corresponding to the irreducible vectorial representation of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Spin</mo> <mo>(</mo> <mn>8</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and in red and green are orbits corresponding to the two spinor representations. These three orbits are interchanged by the action of triality. The figure is original and was made using Microsoft Word<sup>®</sup> v. 2409.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 473 KiB  
Article
Octonion Internal Space Algebra for the Standard Model
by Ivan Todorov
Universe 2023, 9(5), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9050222 - 6 May 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1416
Abstract
This paper surveys recent progress in our search for an appropriate internal space algebra for the standard model (SM) of particle physics. After a brief review of the existing approaches, we start with the Clifford algebras involving operators of left multiplication by octonions. [...] Read more.
This paper surveys recent progress in our search for an appropriate internal space algebra for the standard model (SM) of particle physics. After a brief review of the existing approaches, we start with the Clifford algebras involving operators of left multiplication by octonions. A central role is played by a distinguished complex structure that implements the splitting of the octonions O=CC3, which reflect the lepton-quark symmetry. Such a complex structure on the 32-dimensional space S of C10 Majorana spinors is generated by the C6(C10) volume form, ω6=γ1γ6, and is left invariant by the Pati–Salam subgroup of Spin(10), GPS=Spin(4)×Spin(6)/Z2. While the Spin(10) invariant volume form ω10=γ1γ10 of C10 is known to split S on a complex basis into left and right chiral (semi)spinors, P=12(1iω6) is interpreted as the projector on the 16-dimensional particle subspace (which annihilates the antiparticles).The standard model gauge group appears as the subgroup of GPS that preserves the sterile neutrino (which is identified with the Fock vacuum). The Z2-graded internal space algebra A is then included in the projected tensor product APC10P=C4C60. The Higgs field appears as the scalar term of a superconnection, an element of the odd part C41 of the first factor. The fact that the projection of C10 only involves the even part C60 of the second factor guarantees that the color symmetry remains unbroken. As an application, we express the ratio mHmW of the Higgs to the W boson masses in terms of the cosine of the theoretical Weinberg angle. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mathematical Physics)
31 pages, 482 KiB  
Article
Monstrous M-Theory
by Alessio Marrani, Mike Rios and David Chester
Symmetry 2023, 15(2), 490; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020490 - 13 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5167
Abstract
In 26+1 space–time dimensions, we introduce a gravity theory whose massless spectrum can be acted upon by the Monster group when reduced to 25+1 dimensions. This theory generalizes M-theory in many respects, and we name it Monstrous M-theory, or [...] Read more.
In 26+1 space–time dimensions, we introduce a gravity theory whose massless spectrum can be acted upon by the Monster group when reduced to 25+1 dimensions. This theory generalizes M-theory in many respects, and we name it Monstrous M-theory, or M2-theory. Upon Kaluza–Klein reduction to 25+1 dimensions, the M2-theory spectrum irreducibly splits as 1196,883, where 1 is identified with the dilaton, and 196,883 is the dimension of the smallest non-trivial representation of the Monster. This provides a field theory explanation of the lowest instance of the Monstrous Moonshine, and it clarifies the definition of the Monster as the automorphism group of the Griess algebra by showing that such an algebra is not merely a sum of unrelated spaces, but descends from massless states for M2-theory, which includes Horowitz and Susskind’s bosonic M-theory as a subsector. Further evidence is provided by the decomposition of the coefficients of the partition function of Witten’s extremal Monster SCFT in terms of representations of SO24, the massless little group in 25+1; the purely bosonic nature of the involved SO24-representations may be traced back to the unique feature of 24 dimensions, which allow for a non-trivial generalization of the triality holding in 8 dimensions. Last but not least, a certain subsector of M2-theory, when coupled to a Rarita–Schwinger massless field in 26+1, exhibits the same number of bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom; we cannot help but conjecture the existence of a would-be N=1 supergravity theory in 26+1 space–time dimensions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Noether and Space-Time Symmetries in Physics)
35 pages, 419 KiB  
Article
(2 + 1)-Maxwell Equations in Split Quaternions
by Merab Gogberashvili
Physics 2022, 4(1), 329-363; https://doi.org/10.3390/physics4010023 - 17 Mar 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2313
Abstract
The properties of spinors and vectors in (2 + 2) space of split quaternions are studied. Quaternionic representation of rotations naturally separates two SO(2,1) subgroups of the full group of symmetry of the norms of split quaternions, [...] Read more.
The properties of spinors and vectors in (2 + 2) space of split quaternions are studied. Quaternionic representation of rotations naturally separates two SO(2,1) subgroups of the full group of symmetry of the norms of split quaternions, SO(2,2). One of them represents symmetries of three-dimensional Minkowski space-time. Then, the second SO(2,1) subgroup, generated by the additional time-like coordinate from the basis of split quaternions, can be viewed as the internal symmetry of the model. It is shown that the analyticity condition, applying to the invariant construction of split quaternions, is equivalent to some system of differential equations for quaternionic spinors and vectors. Assuming that the derivatives by extra time-like coordinate generate triality (supersymmetric) rotations, the analyticity equation is reduced to the exact Dirac–Maxwell system in three-dimensional Minkowski space-time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Classical Physics)
1 pages, 159 KiB  
Abstract
É. Cartan’s Supersymmetry, Noncommutative Geometry and Propagation of Time in the Kaluza-Klein-Like Universe
by Sadataka Furui
Proceedings 2018, 2(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2010027 - 3 Jan 2018
Viewed by 1454
Abstract
In order to combine internal symmetries and spacetime that has Poincaré symmetry, it is necesary to introduce supersymmetry, Supersymmetry of Connes is based on involution, and that of Cartan is based on triality. Cartan’s supersymmetry allows violation of Lorentz symmetry and time reversal [...] Read more.
In order to combine internal symmetries and spacetime that has Poincaré symmetry, it is necesary to introduce supersymmetry, Supersymmetry of Connes is based on involution, and that of Cartan is based on triality. Cartan’s supersymmetry allows violation of Lorentz symmetry and time reversal violation can occur. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The First International Conference on Symmetry)
Back to TopTop