Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = tree crown transmittance

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 7182 KiB  
Article
Simulation on Different Patterns of Mobile Laser Scanning with Extended Application on Solar Beam Illumination for Forest Plot
by Kang Jiang, Liang Chen, Xiangjun Wang, Feng An, Huaiqing Zhang and Ting Yun
Forests 2022, 13(12), 2139; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122139 - 13 Dec 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2017
Abstract
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology has become a mainstream tool for forest surveys, significantly contributing to the improved accuracy of forest inventories. However, the accuracy of the scanned data and tree properties derived using LiDAR technology may differ depending on the occlusion [...] Read more.
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology has become a mainstream tool for forest surveys, significantly contributing to the improved accuracy of forest inventories. However, the accuracy of the scanned data and tree properties derived using LiDAR technology may differ depending on the occlusion effect, scanning configurations, various scanning patterns, and vegetative characteristics of forest plots. Hence, this paper presents a computer simulation program to build a digital forest plot composed of many tree models constructed based on in situ measurement information and two mobile scanning patterns, i.e., airborne laser scanning (ALS) and ground-based mobile laser scanning (MLS). Through the adjustment of scanning parameters and the velocity of vehicle loading LiDAR sensors, the points scanned using two scanning patterns were compared with the original sampling points, derived from the constructed digital forest plots. The results show that only 2% of sampling points were collected by LiDAR sensors with the fastest vehicle speed (10 m/s) and coarsest scanning angular resolution (horizontal angular resolution 0.16° and vertical angular resolution 1.33°), and approximately 50% of sampling points were collected by LiDAR sensors with slow vehicle velocity (1.25 m/s) and a finer scanning angular resolution (horizontal angular resolution 0.08° and vertical angular resolution 0.33°). Meanwhile, the potential extended application of the proposed computer simulation program as a light model of forest plots was discussed to underpin the creation of the forest digital twin. Three main conclusions are drawn: (1) the collected points from airborne laser scanning (ALS) are higher than those collected from ground-based mobile laser scanning (MLS); (2) reducing the vehicle velocity is more efficient at improving the high density of the point cloud data than by increasing the scanning angular resolution; (3) the lateral extension of crown area increasing the light beams’ receptor area and the clumped leaf dispersion augmenting the light penetration with vertical elongation are the two paramount factors influencing the light transmittance of tree crowns. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart illustrating the main steps of our mobile laser scanning simulation framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Our program shows the reconstructed forest plot scenario based on the field measurement data. (<b>a</b>) The several trees constituting a forest plot for our study, and the brightness value is adopted to represent the height value. (<b>b</b>) The discretization of tree models using evenly distributed sampling points covering the vegetative element surfaces, where the blue, green, and black points represent the sampling points on the branch surface, leaf surface, and leaf edge, respectively. (<b>c</b>) The magnification of simulated tree crotch structure, where the spot spacing between two neighboring discrete points used in uniform sampling strategy is set to <span class="html-italic">c</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Our simulation program diagram shows the multi-return scanning results caused by the laser characteristics of beam divergence for our studied forest plot. The position of scanner was set at pink point in the figure, where the pink red arrows characterized the emission orientation of laser beams. The red points in the figure represent the sampling points on the edges of leaf surfaces that are scanned by laser beams and trigger the first signal returns. Then, the split beams continue along their paths and collide with the consequent vegetative elements, which produce the second returns, represented by green points. If the second returns occur, caused by the beams being intercepted by any edge point on the leaf surface, it is possible to generate the third return (blue points) when the beams with remnant energy collide with the following vegetative elements again. As seen from the diagram, the first returns are near the scanner and the last returns are further from the scanner.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Our program diagram shows the simulation workflow of our aerial LiDAR scanning process. (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) The predetermined survey route of our flights with a controllable flight speed covering the study site and a top-down scanning pattern. (<b>b</b>) A lying HDL-32E sensor is mounted under the UAV to produce a 41.3° vertical FOV and a 360° horizontal FOV with adjustable angular resolutions, respectively. (<b>d</b>) Final scanning results show sparsely scanned data of the target forest plot, with occlusion dominating in the lower part of the forest canopy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Our program diagram shows the simulation of the ground-based MLS for the modeled forest plot. (<b>a</b>) The set ground vehicle’s path around the target trees and the sensor fires lasers to capture the point cloud from different lateral sides. (<b>b</b>) A standing Velodyne HDL-32E was installed on the car’s roof to guarantee a +10.67° to −30.67° vertical scanning FOV and 360° horizontal scanning FOV, with the settable angular resolution and car running speed. (<b>c</b>) Equivalent diagram illustrates the simulation of a ground-based MLS system designed to acquire forest-scanned data. (<b>d</b>) The collected scanned data from mobile LiDAR with a ground vehicle; occlusion effects are mostly expected to occur high up in the forest, as the leaves in the higher part are out of scanning range due to the limitation in vertical FOV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The vertical profile of the vegetative element distribution is in the form of discrete points. (<b>a</b>) The vertical profile of the original sampling points compared to the vegetative elements. (<b>b</b>) Vertical profiles of the acquired scanned points versus the variation in the tuning of scanned angular resolution with an unchanged velocity of the vehicle loading LiDAR sensors. (<b>c</b>) Vertical profiles of the acquired scanned points versus the variation in tuning vehicle velocity with an unchanged scanning angular resolution. Through the comparison between (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>), the number of the collected point clouds shows that the effect of adjusting velocity outperforms that of the scanning angular resolution in the acquisition of high-density point cloud data for the same forest plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The schematic diagram draws the light simulation of the forest plot based on the proposed framework. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) The exhibition of branch and leaf sampling points of a single tree. (<b>c</b>) The light simulation of a single tree where light originates from the top left. (<b>d</b>) Light simulation of the modeling forest plot with a solar azimuth angle of 179.01° and an altitude angle of 62.88°. (<b>e</b>) The light transmittance of the forest plot under the solar beams at each height interval, where distribution histograms illustrate the number of uniform sampling points (blue color) and solar beam hit points (red color) at each height level, respectively, and the line chart represents the light transmittance at each height level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Light simulation of mixed tree species plot composed of five species in (<b>a</b>). (<b>a</b>) Exemplary three-dimensional models of five tree species built in the SpeedTree software. From left to right: Douglas fir, European beech, Scots pine, Norway spruce, and European ash. (<b>b</b>–<b>e</b>) Light simulation results of mixed tree species plot at different times on 10 September 2022 in Nanjing: (<b>b</b>) at 10:00, (<b>c</b>) at 12:00, (<b>d</b>) at 14:00, and (<b>e</b>) at 16:00.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 3246 KiB  
Article
Light Competition Contributes to the Death of Masson Pines of Coniferous-Broadleaf Mixed Forests in Subtropical China
by Yifan Song, Ge Yan and Guangfu Zhang
Forests 2022, 13(1), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010085 - 8 Jan 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1803
Abstract
In the process of subtropical forest succession, it has long been recognized that population decline of Masson pines in coniferous-broadleaf mixed forest is caused by shading from broadleaf trees. However, little is known about the mechanism underlying the interaction between them. Here, we [...] Read more.
In the process of subtropical forest succession, it has long been recognized that population decline of Masson pines in coniferous-broadleaf mixed forest is caused by shading from broadleaf trees. However, little is known about the mechanism underlying the interaction between them. Here, we first chose two sets of Masson pine plots approximately aged 60 years in subtropical mountainous areas in eastern China (i.e., pure coniferous forest vs. coniferous-broadleaf mixed forest). Then, we measured and compared tree height, diameter at breast height, first branch height (FBH), live crown ratio (LCR) of Masson pines between the two sets of plots, and also determined the difference in growth performance of Masson pines relative to their neighboring broadleaf trees in the mixed forest stand. Compared with plots in pine forests, Masson pines in mixed plots had lower tree height and crown breadth, higher FBH, lower LCR, and leaf area. Furthermore, the difference of mean FBH between reference trees (Masson pines) and their neighboring trees (i.e., broadleaf trees) in mixed forest plots was greater than that in pine forest plots, and the ratio of LCR between Masson pines and their neighbors (0.46) in mixed forest was significantly smaller than in pine forest (1.05), indicating that those broadleaf trees around Masson pines probably affected their growth. The mean distance between Masson pines and neighboring trees (1.59 m) in mixed forest plots was significantly shorter than in pine forest plots (2.77 m) (p < 0.01), suggesting that strong competition may occur between reference trees and their neighbors. There was a significant difference in the ratio of crown volume between reference tree Masson pine and its neighboring trees in mixed forests (p < 0.01), indicating that the ratio of biomass synthesis to consumption of pines was much lower than their nearby broadleaf trees in mixed forest. Our results have demonstrated for the first time that Masson pines’ population decline is affected by shade-tolerant broadleaf late-successional species, which can be primarily attributed to the distinctive light transmittance of dominant species nearby (pure pine vs. mixed forest). This study provides a new perspective for future studies on the mechanism of forest succession. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area showing one pure pine forest (labelled as L1) in Longtan, Liyang and three mixed forests (P1, P2 and P3) in Purple Mountain, Nanjing, within southern Jiangsu Province, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Reference tree Masson pine and its neighboring trees of a pine forest (<b>a</b>) in Longtan, Liyang, and counterparts of a mixed forest (<b>b</b>) in Purple Mountain, Nanjing, China. Reference and neighboring trees are indicated by the red arrows and the yellow ones, respectively. The photographs were provided by Guangfu Zhang.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The position diagram of light transmittance measurement of Masson pine in pine forest and mixed forest of southern Jiangsu, China. h1, h2 and h3 indicate the position with the height of 11.0 m, 9.5 m and 8.0 m above ground but under the reference tree canopy at each sampling point, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) The ratio of crown to trunk volume (V1/V2) for reference tree Masson pine in pine forest and mixed forest indicating the ratio of biomass synthesis to consumption. (<b>b</b>) The ratio of crown volume (V1/V2) between reference tree Masson pine and its neighboring trees in mixed forests indicating their ratio of biomass synthesis. ** indicates significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of light transmittance of three different positions for reference tree Masson pine in pure forest and mixed forest. ** indicates significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 level.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 45487 KiB  
Article
Impact of Tree Crown Transmittance on Surface Reflectance Retrieval in the Shade for High Spatial Resolution Imaging Spectroscopy: A Simulation Analysis Based on Tree Modeling Scenarios
by Karine R. M. Adeline, Xavier Briottet, Sidonie Lefebvre, Nicolas Rivière, Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry and Fabrice Vinatier
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(5), 931; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050931 - 2 Mar 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3226
Abstract
With the advancement of high spatial resolution imaging spectroscopy, an accurate surface reflectance retrieval is needed to derive relevant physical variables for land cover mapping, soil, and vegetation monitoring. One challenge is to deal with tree shadows using atmospheric correction models if the [...] Read more.
With the advancement of high spatial resolution imaging spectroscopy, an accurate surface reflectance retrieval is needed to derive relevant physical variables for land cover mapping, soil, and vegetation monitoring. One challenge is to deal with tree shadows using atmospheric correction models if the tree crown transmittance Tc is not properly taken into account. This requires knowledge of the complex radiation mechanisms that occur in tree crowns, which can be provided by coupling the physical modeling of canopy radiative transfer codes (here DART) and the 3D representations of trees. First in this study, a sensitivity analysis carried out on DART simulations with an empirical 3D tree model led to a statistical regression predicting Tc from the tree leaf area index (LAI) and the solar zenith angle with good performances (RMSE ≤ 4.3% and R2 ≥ 0.91 for LAI ≤ 4 m2.m−2). Secondly, more realistic 3D voxel-grid tree models derived from terrestrial LiDAR measurements over two trees were considered. The comparison of DART-simulated Tc from these models with the previous predicted Tc over 0.4–2.5 µm showed three main sources of inaccuracy quoted in order of importance: (1) the global tree geometry shape (mean bias up to 21.5%), (2) the transmittance fraction associated to multiple scattering, Tscat (maximum bias up to 13%), and (3) the degree of realism of the tree representation (mean bias up to 7.5%). Results showed that neglecting Tc leads to very inaccurate reflectance retrieval (mean bias > 0.04), particularly if the background reflectance is high, and in the near and shortwave infrared – NIR and SWIR – due to Tscat. The transmittance fraction associated to the non-intercepted transmitted light, Tdir, can reach up to 95% in the SWIR, and Tscat up to 20% in the NIR. Their spatial contributions computed in the tree shadow have a maximum dispersion of 27% and 8% respectively. Investigating how to approximate Tdir and Tscat spectral and spatial variability along with the most appropriate tree 3D modeling is crucial to improve reflectance retrieval in tree shadows when using atmospheric correction models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Agriculture and Vegetation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Digital camera pictures of the two trees (top left side: magnolia; top right side: linden) and mean spectral properties of their trunk and leaves (bottom side: “leaf 1” stands for reflectances and “leaf 2” stands for 1 − transmittance).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>General methodological workflow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>DART 3D mockups of the tree models and NPV (i.e., trunk and branches) for the two species (for global interpretation, dimensions are not respected). Leaves are either represented by triangles (light green color) in the TLS-based tree model n°1 or simulated as a 3D distribution of voxels filled with turbid medium (dark green color) in the discrete voxel-grid tree model n°2 and the geometric voxel-grid tree models n°4 and E. NPV (brown color) are either represented by triangles for the TLS-based and discrete/geometric voxel-grid tree models n°1, 2, and 4 or a cylinder followed by a cone for the discrete/geometric voxel-grid tree models n°3, 5, and 6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Optical properties of the DART scene background (reflectance, and both the trunk (reflectance) and leaves (reflectance and 1 − transmittance) for the empirical tree model E. Differences in the number of displayed dots are due to the fact that the spectra do not have the same number of wavelengths. DART applies an interpolation for wavelengths where the spectrum value is not provided.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sensitive index η<sup>2</sup> computed for each input parameter alone or in interactions (contribution in the variability of the output, that is the tree crown transmittance) for different LAI ranges, (<b>a</b>) low: 0.5 m<sup>2</sup>.m<sup>−2</sup> ≤ LAI ≤ 2 m<sup>2</sup>.m<sup>−2</sup>, (<b>b</b>) medium: 2 m<sup>2</sup>.m<sup>−2</sup> ≤ LAI ≤ 3.5 m<sup>2</sup>.m<sup>−2</sup> and (<b>c</b>) high: 3.5 m<sup>2</sup>.m<sup>−2</sup> ≤ LAI ≤ 8 m<sup>2</sup>.m<sup>−2</sup> for the empirical tree model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spectral variations of the tree crown transmittance for LAI equal to (<b>a</b>) 1 m<sup>2</sup>.m<sup>−2</sup>, (<b>b</b>) 3 m<sup>2</sup>.m<sup>−2</sup> and (<b>c</b>) 6 m<sup>2</sup>.m<sup>−2</sup> for the empirical tree model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spectral validation of tree crown transmittance between predictions and simulations for the empirical tree model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of the simulated mean tree crown transmittances for the tree models from n°1 to 6 and the predicted one from the empirical tree model, for (<b>a</b>) the linden and (<b>b</b>) the magnolia tree (SZA = 45° and BACKGROUND = grass).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Ratio of the direct intercepted irradiance over the direct <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> through a vertical profile at X = 10 m (first/third rows) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> computed at the ground surface Z = 0 m (second/fourth rows) for the linden (two first rows) and magnolia trees (two last rows) at 0.8 µm (SZA = 45° and BACKGROUND = grass; solar direction indicated by the black arrow, crown spatial extents delineated in black, shadow and trunk location in white).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Boxplots of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> representing their spatial variations computed within the tree shadow delineations at ground for the different tree models of the linden and magnolia trees at 0.8 µm (SZA = 45° and BACKGROUND = grass; red/blue dots: mean/standard deviation).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Ratio of the multiple scattered intercepted irradiance over <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> through a vertical profile at X = 10 m (first/third rows) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> computed at the ground surface Z = 0 m (second/fourth rows) for the linden (two first rows) and magnolia trees (two last rows) at 0.8 µm (SZA = 45° and BACKGROUND = grass; solar direction indicated by the black arrow, crown spatial extents delineated in black, shadow and trunk location in black).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Ratio of the direct and multiple scattered intercepted irradiance over <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> through a vertical profile at X = 11.2 m (first row) and (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> or (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> computed at the ground surface Z = 0 m (second row) for the empirical tree model at 0.8 µm with (1) and (3) the base simulation scenario, (2) POROSITY = 70% and (4) BACKGROUND = grass (solar direction indicated by the black arrow, crown spatial extents delineated in black, shadow and trunk location in black or white).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Boxplots of (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> representing their spatial variations computed within the tree shadow delineations at ground for the empirical tree model at 0.8 µm with the variations of the input parameters compared to the base simulation scenario (red/blue dots: mean/standard deviation).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Spectral mean fraction of irradiance terms in total irradiance received at tree shadow for the TLS-based tree models and both (<b>a</b>) the linden and (<b>b</b>) the magnolia tree (SZA = 45° and BACKGROUND = grass).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Illustrations of the LAI-2000 measuring principle and PAI retrieval for an isolated tree: (<b>a</b>) in the horizontal plane, measurements following the cardinal orientations with the device positions under and outside the tree crown (digital photos taken to show the crown heterogeneity), (<b>b</b>) in the vertical plane for each cardinal orientation, assessment of the sunlight path lengths inside the crown following the detector incident angles and with the help of the TLS 3D point cloud, and (<b>c</b>) the projection of the TLS 3D point clouds onto the mean ground plane defining a polyline whose the interior surface represents the tree crown projected area.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Illustrations of the five steps of radiation propagation (top: adapted from DART user manual) and the extraction of the radiative components (below).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2510 KiB  
Article
The Economy of Canopy Space Occupation and Shade Production in Early- to Late-Successional Temperate Tree Species and Their Relation to Productivity
by Christoph Leuschner and Marc Hagemeier
Forests 2020, 11(3), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030317 - 13 Mar 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2135
Abstract
Light capture is linked to occupation of canopy space by tree crowns, which requires investment of carbon and nutrients. We hypothesize that (i) late-successional trees invest more in casting shade than in occupying space than early-successional trees, and (ii) shade production and crown [...] Read more.
Light capture is linked to occupation of canopy space by tree crowns, which requires investment of carbon and nutrients. We hypothesize that (i) late-successional trees invest more in casting shade than in occupying space than early-successional trees, and (ii) shade production and crown volume expansion are generally greater in more productive species. For six Central European early-successional (Betula pendula, Pinus sylvestris), mid/late-successional (Quercus petraea, Carpinus betulus), and late-successional tree species (Tilia cordata, Fagus sylvatica), we measured through full-tree harvests (1) crown volume, (2) the costs of canopy space exploration (carbon (C) and nutrients invested to fill crown volume), of space occupation (annual foliage production per volume), and of shade production (foliage needed to reduce light transmittance), and (3) related the costs to aboveground productivity (ANPP). The C and nutrient costs of canopy volume exploration and occupation were independent of the species’ seral stage, but increased with ANPP. In contrast, the cost of shade production decreased from early-to late-successional species, suggesting that the economy of shade production is more decisive for the competitive superiority of late-successional species than the economy of canopy space exploration and occupation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecophysiology of Forest Succession under Changing Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Biomass stocks in the 12 studied forest stands of the six tree species by fraction. Deadwood refers to dead branches attached to the stem. The leaf/needle fraction was too small to be depicted in the bars in several stands. The species are arranged according to their position in forest succession.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Biomass per unit crown volume in the sun (<b>A</b>), mid (<b>B</b>), and shade crown (<b>C</b>) of the six species by biomass fraction (means and standard deviation of each four harvested trees [Fagus: N = 9]). Deadwood refers to dead branches attached to the stem. Significantly different means between species are marked by different small letters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pools of nitrogen (<b>A</b>), phosphorus (<b>B</b>), calcium (<b>C</b>), potassium (<b>D</b>), and magnesium (<b>E</b>) in the biomass (leaves/needles, twigs, branches, stem wood) per unit crown volume in the sun, mid and shade crown of the six tree species (means and standard deviation of each four harvested trees [Fagus: nine]). Significantly different means between species are marked by different small letters. The leaf fraction is marked by white dots in the bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Costs of canopy space exploration and occupation in the sun crown of the six species, expressed as ‘initial costs’ (grey bars; the standing biomass of leaves/needles, twigs, and branches) and ‘annual costs’ (black bars; annual leaf/needle mass production) in terms of C, N, Mg, or P investment (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) needed to build the organs (means and standard deviation of each four harvested trees [<span class="html-italic">Fagus</span>: <span class="html-italic">N = 9</span>]). Significantly different means between species are indicated by different small letters (initial costs) or capital letters (annual costs). For <span class="html-italic">Pinus</span>, only the production of current-year needles is considered in the annual costs. In case of nitrogen, foliar leaching and uptake are not considered. The species are arranged according to their position in forest succession.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cost of shade production in terms of leaf biomass in the stands of the six species (means and standard deviation of each 10 litter buckets per stand). Given is the carbon (<b>A</b>), nitrogen (<b>B</b>), magnesium (<b>C</b>) and phosphorus (<b>D</b>) investment needed to build the foliage in the stands (grey bars; foliar pool) and the quotient foliar element pool / δ, with δ being the interceptivity factor of the canopy. δ is derived from measured canopy transmissivity for PAR (see text for explanation). The dotted bars mark the current-year needles of <span class="html-italic">Pinus</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Aboveground productivity (dry mass) of the 12 stands of six tree species in 1999 by fraction. Coarse and fine litter was collected with two different litter bucket types. The production of deadwood refers to the calculated increase in dead branch mass in the trees.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3345 KiB  
Article
Leaf and Crown Optical Properties of Five Early-, Mid- and Late-Successional Temperate Tree Species and Their Relation to Sapling Light Demand
by Marc Hagemeier and Christoph Leuschner
Forests 2019, 10(10), 925; https://doi.org/10.3390/f10100925 - 21 Oct 2019
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3181
Abstract
The optical properties of leaves and canopies determine the availability of radiation for photosynthesis and the penetration of light through tree canopies. How leaf absorptance, reflectance and transmittance and radiation transmission through tree canopies change with forest succession is not well understood. We [...] Read more.
The optical properties of leaves and canopies determine the availability of radiation for photosynthesis and the penetration of light through tree canopies. How leaf absorptance, reflectance and transmittance and radiation transmission through tree canopies change with forest succession is not well understood. We measured the leaf optical properties in the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) range of five Central European early-, mid- and late-successional temperate broadleaf tree species and studied the minimum light demand of the lowermost shade leaves and of the species’ offspring. Leaf absorptance in the 350–720 nm range varied between c. 70% and 77% in the crown of all five species with only a minor variation from the sun to the shade crown and between species. However, specific absorptance (absorptance normalized by mass per leaf area) increased about threefold from sun to shade leaves with decreasing leaf mass area (LMA) in the late-successional species (Carpinus betulus L., Tilia cordata Mill., Fagus sylvatica L.), while it was generally lower in the early- to mid-successional species (Betula pendula Roth, Quercus petraea (Matt.)Liebl.), where it changed only a little from sun to shade crown. Due to a significant increase in leaf area index, canopy PAR transmittance to the forest floor decreased from early- to late-successional species from ~15% to 1%–3% of incident PAR, linked to a decrease in the minimum light demand of the lowermost shade leaves (from ~20 to 1%–2%) and of the species’ saplings (from ~20 to 3%–4%). The median light intensity on the forest floor under a closed canopy was in all species lower than the saplings’ minimum light demand. We conclude that the optical properties of the sun leaves are very similar among early-, mid- and late-successional tree species, while the shade leaves of these groups differ not only morphologically, but also in terms of the resource investment needed to achieve high PAR absorptance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tree Crown Dynamics and Morphology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PAR-transmittance spectra of upper sun-canopy leaves of the five species with consideration of leaf specular properties. Depicted are mean curves of spectroradiometer measurements on each of 10 leaves per species. For standard deviation of means see <a href="#app1-forests-10-00925" class="html-app">Figure S3 in the Supplement</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>PAR-absorptance spectra of upper sun-canopy leaves of the five species with consideration of leaf specular properties. Depicted are mean curves of spectroradiometer measurements on each 10 leaves per species. For standard deviations of means see <a href="#app1-forests-10-00925" class="html-app">Figure S2 in the Supplement</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Transmittance (<b>a</b>) and absorptance (<b>b</b>) of PAR by leaves of the five species in dependence on height in the canopy (means of the 350–720 nm wave band, with consideration of leaf specular properties). Based on spectroradiometer measurements of each of 10 leaves per height level and species.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Specific absorptance (absorptance normalized by leaf mass area (LMA)) of PAR (350–720 nm wave band) of leaves of the five species in dependence on height in the canopy (absorptivity in % per unit leaf dry mass per area). Means ± 1 STD are given.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relative PAR irradiance (in percent of incident radiation) on the forest floor in each two stands with closed canopy of the five tree species (<span class="html-italic">Tilia</span>: only one stand). Paired measurements with two quantum sensors at 110–241 measurement points around noon (11 a.m.–2:00 p.m.) under overcast sky with one sensor placed in the open and the other moved on the forest floor. Box-whisker plots with median, 25- and 75-percentiles, and minima and maxima. Significantly different arithmetic means are indicated with different small letters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relative PAR irradiance (in % of incident radiation) directly above juvenile plants (Juv), the lowermost shade leaves of adult trees (ShL), and on the forest floor (FoFl) in several stands with closed canopy of the five tree species. In order to quantify minimum light demand, the radiation measurements above vital juveniles and adult trees’ shade leaves were conducted at the darkest locations, where these objects were found in the stands. The total numbers of radiation measurements per stand are depicted in the figure top. Different small letters indicate significantly different arithmetic means between juveniles, shade leaves and forest floor.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop