Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (146)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = residual strength of soil

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 5480 KiB  
Article
A Correlation Relating the Residual Strength Parameters to the Proportions of Clay Fractions and Plasticity Characteristics of Overburden Sediments from the Open-Pit Mine Drmno
by Stevan Ćorluka, Dragoslav Rakić, Nikola Živanović, Ksenija Djoković and Tina Đurić
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10325; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210325 - 10 Nov 2024
Viewed by 484
Abstract
One of the prerequisites for the safe exploitation of surface mines is the stability of the working and final slopes of the mine. In order to ensure this, it is necessary to carry out detailed field and laboratory geomechanical tests of the soil [...] Read more.
One of the prerequisites for the safe exploitation of surface mines is the stability of the working and final slopes of the mine. In order to ensure this, it is necessary to carry out detailed field and laboratory geomechanical tests of the soil and, based on the obtained results, make calculations related to stability analyses. The results obtained in this way are used for dimensioning the slope of exploitation slopes (excavation). Landslides occur when the ultimate shear strength is reached, and therefore, the adequate definition of shear strength parameters is one of the essential prerequisites for successfully solving the stability problem. Unlike earlier tests in Serbia, when the residual shear strength parameters were determined based on the usual conventional methods (direct shear apparatus, triaxial apparatus), this time, in addition to the direct shear apparatus, a ring shear apparatus was also chosen for testing. The paper shows the method of determining the residual shear strength parameters of high plasticity gray clays and siltstones of roof sediments from open pit mine Drmno, using direct and ring shear apparatus. The results show that the residual angle of internal friction for gray clays obtained with the ring shear apparatus is 9.9–10.8°, and for the siltstone, it is 11.8–12.9°, both of which are lower than the values obtained with the direct shear apparatus. In addition, correlations between the residual parameters of soil shear resistance and some physical indicators (plasticity index, clay content) are provided, showing high correlation coefficients. The proposed correlations should be used only when time and financial constraints prevent the execution of actual tests to determine residual shear strength, as concrete experimental procedures provide a much more reliable assessment of the residual strength properties of the soil. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>). Position of Serbia in relation to Europe. (<b>b</b>). Position of the Kostolac area in relation to Serbia. (<b>c</b>). Position of the Drmno deposit in relation to Kostolac.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic representation of the final western slope of the open pit mine: 1: humus; 2: sand; 3: gravel; 4: siltstone; 5: second coal layer; 6: third coal layer; 7: gray clay.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Bromhead’s ring shear apparatus. (<b>b</b>) Three-dimensional model of the ring shear apparatus (Source: manufacturer’s manual). Legend: 1, 2—horizontal force measurement cell, 3—frame for transmitting vertical load, 4—touchscreen display, 5—vertical force measurement cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Matest direct shear apparatus. (<b>b</b>) Two-dimensional model of the direct shear apparatus [<a href="#B34-applsci-14-10325" class="html-bibr">34</a>] (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [Karimpour F. et al., 2015]) Legend: 1—frame of the apparatus, 2—system for transmitting horizontal load, 3—digital control unit, 4—device for measuring horizontal linear displacements, 5—device for measuring horizontal load, 6—device for measuring vertical linear displacements, 7—system for transmitting vertical load, 8—plate for transmitting uniform vertical load, 9, 10—shear box.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Appearance of the gray clay samples after testing in the ring shear apparatus (<b>left</b>) and direct shear apparatus (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Particle size distribution graph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Identification and classification indicators of the tested samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Shear stress versus rotation angle for (<b>a</b>) siltstone (<b>b</b>) gray clay.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Shear stress versus horizontal displacement for (<b>a</b>) siltstone (<b>b</b>) gray clay.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Values of the residual shear strength parameters depending on the testing method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Correlation values of the residual angle of internal friction obtained from the DS and RS apparatuses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Correlation values between the plasticity index (Ip) and the residual angle of internal friction obtained from the DS (<b>right</b>) and RS (<b>left</b>) apparatuses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Correlation values between the percentage of fractions less than 0.002 mm and the residual angle of internal friction obtained from the DS (<b>right</b>) and RS (<b>left</b>) apparatuses.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2378 KiB  
Article
Adsorption and Immobilization of Cadmium by an Iron-Coated Montmorillonite Composite
by Bangzheng Ren, Chengqiang Shu, Zailin Chen, Qiang Xiao and Yuli He
Water 2024, 16(21), 3105; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16213105 - 30 Oct 2024
Viewed by 508
Abstract
In this study, an iron-coated montmorillonite composite (FMC) was prepared, and the adsorption and immobilization of cadmium (Cd) was investigated. The composite was coated with spherical amorphous iron (Fe), which can promote the adsorption of Cd. At the fifth minute of adsorption, the [...] Read more.
In this study, an iron-coated montmorillonite composite (FMC) was prepared, and the adsorption and immobilization of cadmium (Cd) was investigated. The composite was coated with spherical amorphous iron (Fe), which can promote the adsorption of Cd. At the fifth minute of adsorption, the rate of Cd adsorption by the FMC reached 97.8%. With temperature, the adsorption of Cd by FMCs first increases and then decreases. High pH can promote Cd adsorption; under the same ionic strength, the adsorption of Cd was greater by montmorillonite (Mont) than that by the FMC at pH < 4, but greater by FMC than that by Mont at pH > 4. High ionic strength had negative effects on Cd(II) adsorption by FMC and Mont, and ionic strength had less of an influence on the FMC than on Mont. Soil microorganisms promoted the dissolution of Fe and the release of Cd in the FMC. High temperature can promote the dissolution of Fe, but its effect on Cd release is not significant. At 32 °C, the Fe dissolution can promote Cd release in the FMC. Both the FMC and Mont reduced the bioavailability and leaching toxicity of Cd, reduced the exchangeable Cd, and increased the Fe-Mn bound and residual Cd. Overall, the FMC was more effective than Mont at immobilizing Cd. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Wastewater Treatment and Reuse)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic illustration of the preparation process of FMC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>X-ray diffraction pattern of Fe-coated montmorillonite composites (FMCs) with different Fe content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy pattern of FMCs with different Fe contents.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scanning electron microscopy images of (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) montmorillonite (Mont) and (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) FMC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Scanning electron microscopy images of (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) montmorillonite (Mont) and (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) FMC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Adsorption of Cd on FMCs with different Fe content. pH 6.0, m/v = 0.5 g/20 mL, I = 0.01 M NaNO<sub>3</sub>, and time = 24 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Effect of contact time on Cd adsorption. (<b>B</b>) Pseudo-second order kinetics of Cd adsorption. C<sub>0</sub> = 200 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, pH 6.0, m/v = 0.3 g/20 mL, ionic strength (I) = 0.01 M NaNO<sub>3</sub>, and temperature (T) = 298.15 K.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Adsorption rate of Cd at different temperatures. C<sub>0</sub> = 200 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, pH 6.0, m/v = 0.5 g/20 mL, I = 0.01 M NaNO<sub>3</sub>, and time = 24 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effect of pH and ionic strength on Cd adsorption. C<sub>0</sub> = 200 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, m/v = 0.5 g/20 mL, and time = 24 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effect of competitive ions on Cd adsorption. C<sub>0</sub> = 200 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, pH 6.0, m/v = 0.5 g/20 mL, and time = 24 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Total Fe (TFe) concentration under microorganism action.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Cd concentration under microorganism action.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The relationship between Fe dissolution and Cd release in FMC samples inoculated with soil microorganisms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Effects of the FMC and Mont on the (<b>A</b>) bioavailability and (<b>B</b>) toxic dissolution of Cd and (<b>C</b>) pH in soil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Effect of FMC and Mont on fraction distribution of Cd in soil.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 17177 KiB  
Article
Optimization Design and Experimental Analysis of Resistance-Reducing Anti-Fracture Rotary Blade Based on DEM Techniques
by Xiaochuan Zhao, Zhikai Ma, Jianguo Zhao, Jianchang Li, Jiale Zhao, Binhao Dai, Meilin An, Jiaping Wang and Jianjun Hao
Agronomy 2024, 14(11), 2531; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112531 - 28 Oct 2024
Viewed by 533
Abstract
To address the significant cutting resistance and fracture susceptibility of rotary blades, an innovative blade design was conceived to minimize resistance and enhance fracture resistance. By analyzing the interaction between the blade, soil, and root systems, an optimized design for the blade structure’s [...] Read more.
To address the significant cutting resistance and fracture susceptibility of rotary blades, an innovative blade design was conceived to minimize resistance and enhance fracture resistance. By analyzing the interaction between the blade, soil, and root systems, an optimized design for the blade structure’s breakage resistance was developed. The theory of eccentric circular side cutting edges was applied to redesign the curve of the side cutting edge, and kinematic analysis was conducted to determine the optimal edge angle (26.57°). A flexible body model of corn residues was established, and cutting resistance measurements indicated a 15.1% reduction in cutting resistance. The breakage resistance of the rotary blade was validated using a discrete element method–finite element method (DEM–FEM) coupling approach. The results demonstrated the following: neck stress (−16.85%), specific strength efficiency (+9.72%), specific stiffness efficiency (+9.78%), fatigue life (+39.08%), and ultimate fracture stress (+20.16%), thereby meeting the design objectives. The comparison between field trial results and simulation data showed an error rate (<5%), confirming the simulation test’s feasibility. These findings provide theoretical references for reducing cutting resistance and enhancing breakage resistance in rotary blades. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Biosystem and Biological Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of right-handed blade operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of the sliding cut angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Force analysis diagram of the side cutting edge during sliding cut.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic diagram of the eccentric circle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation of the sliding cut angle τc with respect to the polar angle φ1 (e = 0.6 to 2.8).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic diagram of forces on the cutting-edge section of the rotary blade: <span class="html-italic">F<sub>Z</sub></span> represents the total cutting resistance (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">T</span>1</sub> represents the soil frictional force on the blade edge (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">T</span>2</sub> and <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">T</span>3</sub> represent the soil frictional forces on the blade body (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">N</span>1</sub> represents the soil normal pressure on the blade edge (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">N</span>2</sub> and <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">N</span>3</sub> represent the soil normal pressures on the blade body (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">C</span>1</sub> represents the soil adhesion force on the blade edge (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">C</span>2</sub> and <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">C</span>3</sub> represent the soil adhesion forces on the blade body (N); <span class="html-italic">C</span> represents the soil cohesion (N); <span class="html-italic">F<sub>j</sub></span> represents the cutting resistance of corn residue and straw (N).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Design principles of the cutting-edge angle: 1. Cross section of cutting part of IT260 rotary blade 2. Optimized part 3. Cross section of cutting part of RA rotary blade. Note: <span class="html-italic">l</span> is edge width of IT260 rotary blade, mm; <span class="html-italic">l’</span> is edge width of RA rotary blade, mm; <span class="html-italic">α</span> is edge angle of IT260 rotary blade, (°); <span class="html-italic">α’</span> is edge angle of RA rotary blade, (°).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic diagram of forces on the cutting-edge section of the rotary blade: <span class="html-italic">F<sub>Z</sub></span>′ is the total cutting resistance (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">T</span>1</sub>′ is the soil friction force on the cutting edge (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">T</span>2</sub>′ is the soil friction force on the tool body (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">N</span>1</sub>′ is the soil normal force on the cutting edge (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">N</span>2</sub>′ is the soil normal force on the tool body (N); <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub><span class="html-italic">C</span>1</sub>′ is the soil adhesion force on the cutting edge (N).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic diagram of the RA rotary blade handle structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Selection of corn residue samples: (<b>a</b>) test site; (<b>b</b>) root section diagram; (<b>c</b>) sampling diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Flexible body model of corn residue: (<b>a</b>) bonding model; (<b>b</b>) particle model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Software visualization window.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Particle contact model: <span class="html-italic">Fn</span> and <span class="html-italic">Ft</span> represent the normal and tangential contact force, respectively, N; <span class="html-italic">Mn</span> and <span class="html-italic">Mt</span> are the normal and tangential torque of particle, respectively, N·m; <span class="html-italic">R</span> is radius of particle, m; <span class="html-italic">R<sub>B</sub></span> is the radius of Bond, m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Box diagram and straw model: (<b>a</b>) box plot; (<b>b</b>) straw model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Soil particle models of different sizes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Soil bin model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Cutting resistance experiment design diagram: (<b>a</b>) Test tool; (<b>b</b>) Experiment scene 1. Sharp IT260 Rotary Blade; 2. Sharp RA Rotary Blade; 3. Unsharpened IT260 Rotary Blade; 4. Unsharpened RA Rotary Blade.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Diagram of monitor position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Process of corn residue fragmentation: (<b>a</b>) 0 s; (<b>b</b>) 0.2 s; (<b>c</b>) 0.4 s; (<b>d</b>) 0.6 s; (<b>e</b>) 0.8 s; (<b>f</b>) 1 s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Tillage process: (<b>a</b>) 0 s; (<b>b</b>) 0.2 s; (<b>c</b>) 0.4 s; (<b>d</b>) 0.6 s; (<b>e</b>) 0.8 s; (<b>f</b>) 1 s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Schematic of soil crushing rate testing method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Schematic of straw coverage rate testing method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Experimental site and main equipment: (<b>a</b>) experimental site; (<b>b</b>) main experimental equipment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Determination of soil fragmentation rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Determination of straw coverage rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Response surface plot: (<b>a</b>) factor <span class="html-italic">τ<sub>c</sub></span> and <span class="html-italic">e</span> response surface; (<b>b</b>) factor <span class="html-italic">τ<sub>c</sub></span> and <span class="html-italic">φ</span><sub>1</sub> response surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Schematic of eccentric circular cutting edge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>Comparison of cutting resistance results: (<b>a</b>) comparison results of P2 and P4; (<b>b</b>) comparison results of P1 and P2; (<b>c</b>) comparison results of P3 and P4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>Contour map of maximum equivalent stress.</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>Comparison of forces on the neck.</p>
Full article ">Figure 31
<p>Fatigue life cloud diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 32
<p>Contour map of ultimate fracture stress.</p>
Full article ">Figure 33
<p>Results of bond breakage.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 40212 KiB  
Article
Global and Local Shear Behavior of the Frozen Soil–Concrete Interface: Effects of Temperature, Water Content, Normal Stress, and Shear Rate
by Kun Zhang, Jianglin Yan, Yanhu Mu, Xiaoming Zhu and Lianhai Zhang
Buildings 2024, 14(10), 3319; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103319 - 21 Oct 2024
Viewed by 497
Abstract
The interface between soil and concrete in cold climates has a significant effect on the structural integrity of embedded structures, including piles, liners, and others. In this study, a novel temperature control system was employed to conduct direct shear tests on this interface. [...] Read more.
The interface between soil and concrete in cold climates has a significant effect on the structural integrity of embedded structures, including piles, liners, and others. In this study, a novel temperature control system was employed to conduct direct shear tests on this interface. The test conditions included normal stress (25 to 100 kPa), temperature (ranging from 20 to −6 °C), water content (from 10 to 19%), and shear rates (0.1 to 1.2 mm/min). Simultaneously, the deformation process of the interface was continuously photographed using a modified visual shear box, and the non-uniform deformation mechanism of the interface was analyzed by combining digital image correlation (DIC) technology with the photographic data. The findings revealed that the shear stress–shear displacement curves did not exhibit a discernible peak strength at elevated temperatures, indicating deformation behavior characterized by strain hardening. In the frozen state, however, the deformation softened, and the interfacial ice bonding strength exhibited a positive correlation with decreasing temperature. When the initial water content was 16% and the normal stress was 100 kPa, the peak shear strength increased significantly from 99.9 kPa to 182.9 kPa as the test temperature dropped from 20 °C to −6 °C. Both shear rate and temperature were found to have a marked effect on the peak shear strength, with interface cohesion being the principal factor contributing to this phenomenon. At a shear rate of 0.1 mm/min, the curve showed hardening characteristics, but at other shear rates, the curves exhibited strain-softening behavior, with the softening becoming more pronounced as shear rates increased and temperatures decreased. Due to the refreezing of interfacial ice, the residual shear strength increased in proportion to the reduction in shear rate. On a mesoscopic level, it was evident that the displacement of soil particles near the interface exhibited more pronounced changes. At lower shear rates, the phenomenon of interfacial refreezing became apparent, as evidenced by the periodic changes in interfacial granular displacement at the interface. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Mechanics Analysis of Soil-Structure Interaction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Soil particle size grading curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Concrete surface contour line and the measured parameters of surface roughness and their respective JRC values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Frozen soil–concrete sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Shear schematic diagram of the temperature control device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram of visual direct shear test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic diagram of the test process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Shear stress–shear displacement curves under different normal stresses. (<b>a</b>), water content w = 13% and temperature T = 20 °C; (<b>b</b>), water content w = 19% and temperature T = 20 °C; (<b>c</b>), water content w = 13% and temperature T = −6 °C; (<b>d</b>), water content w = 19% and temperature T = −6 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Shear stress–shear displacement curves under different temperatures. (<b>a</b>), water content w = 10%; (<b>b</b>), water content w = 13%; (<b>c</b>), water content w = 16%; (<b>d</b>), water content w = 19%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Shear stress-shear displacement curve of concrete and soil under different shear rates. (<b>a</b>), temperature T = 20 °C; (<b>b</b>), temperature T = 2 °C; (<b>c</b>), temperature T = −4 °C; (<b>d</b>), temperature T = −6 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Variation of peak shear strength under different normal stresses, test temperatures, and water contents.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Variation of peak shear strength under different normal stresses, shear rates, and test temperatures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Interface shear strength parameters under different water contents and temperatures. (<b>a</b>) Interface cohesion–temperature curve at different water contents. (<b>b</b>) Interface friction–temperature curve at different water contents. (<b>c</b>) Interface cohesion–water content curve at different temperatures. (<b>d</b>) Interface friction–water content curve at different temperatures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Interface shear strength parameters under different shear rates and temperatures. (<b>a</b>) Interface cohesion vs. temperature under varying shear rate. (<b>b</b>) Interface friction vs. temperature under varying shear rate. (<b>c</b>) Interface cohesion vs. shear rate under varying temperature. (<b>d</b>) Interface friction vs. shear rate under different temperatures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Schematic diagram of the DIC-analyzed region division.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Displacement change curve of X-axis and Y-axis during shearing of soil under <span class="html-italic">w</span> = 16%, <span class="html-italic">T</span> = −4 °C, and <span class="html-italic">σ<sub>n</sub></span> =25 kPa. (<b>a</b>) Horizontal displacement vs. shear displacement at point 1 to 5. (<b>b</b>) Horizontal displacement vs. shear displacement at point 6 to 10. (<b>c</b>) Horizontal displacement vs. shear displacement at point 11 to 15. (<b>d</b>) Vertical displacement vs. shear displacement at point 1 to 5. (<b>e</b>) Vertical displacement vs. shear displacement at point 6 to 10. (<b>f</b>) Vertical displacement vs. shear displacement at point 11 to 15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Displacement change curves of the X-axis and Y-axis under different temperatures during shearing under <span class="html-italic">v</span> = 0.8 mm/min and <span class="html-italic">σ<sub>n</sub></span> = 100 kPa. (<b>a</b>) Horizontal displacement vs. shear displacement under T = 20 °C and w = 13%. (<b>b</b>) Horizontal displacement vs. shear displacement under T = −6 °C and w = 13%. (<b>c</b>) Vertical displacement vs. shear displacement under T = 20 °C and w = 13%. (<b>d</b>) Vertical displacement vs. shear displacement under T = −6 °C and w = 13%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Displacement change curves of the X-axis and Y-axis during shearing under different water contents. (<b>a</b>) Horizontal displacement vs. shear displacement under T = −4 °C, σ<sub>n</sub> = 50 kPa and w = 10%. (<b>b</b>) Horizontal displace-ment vs. shear displacement under T = −4 °C, σ<sub>n</sub> = 50 kPa and w = 19%. (<b>c</b>) Vertical displacement vs. shear displacement under T = −4 °C, σ<sub>n</sub> = 50 kPa and w = 10%. (<b>d</b>) Vertical displacement vs. shear displacement under T = −4 °C, σ<sub>n</sub> = 50 kPa and w = 19%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Displacement change curves of the X-axis and Y-axis during shearing under different rates. (<b>a</b>) Horizontal displacement vs. shear displacement under v = 0.1 mm/min. (<b>b</b>) Horizontal displacement vs. shear displacement under v = 0.4 mm/min. (<b>c</b>) Horizontal displacement vs. shear displacement under v =1.2 mm/min. (<b>d</b>) Vertical displacement vs. shear displacement under v = 0.1 mm/min. (<b>e</b>) Vertical displacement vs. shear displacement under v = 0.4 mm/min. (<b>f</b>) Vertical displacement vs. shear displacement under v = 1.2 mm/min.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2934 KiB  
Article
Recovery and Restructuring of Fine and Coarse Soil Fractions as Earthen Construction Materials
by Mazhar Hussain, Ines Lamrous, Antony Provost, Nathalie Leblanc, Hafida Zmamou, Daniel Levacher and Abdoulaye Kane
Sustainability 2024, 16(20), 8952; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208952 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 701
Abstract
Excessive consumption of natural resources to meet the growing demands of building and infrastructure projects has put enormous stress on these resources. On the other hand, a significant quantity of soil is excavated for development activities across the globe and is usually treated [...] Read more.
Excessive consumption of natural resources to meet the growing demands of building and infrastructure projects has put enormous stress on these resources. On the other hand, a significant quantity of soil is excavated for development activities across the globe and is usually treated as waste material. This study explores the potential of excavated soils in the Brittany region of France for its reuse as earthen construction materials. Characterization of soil recovered from building sites was carried out to classify the soils and observe their suitability for earthen construction materials. These characteristics include mainly Atterberg limits, granulometry, organic matter and optimum moisture content. Soil samples were separated into fine and coarse particles through wet sieving. The percentage of fines (particles smaller than 0.063 mm) in studied soil samples range from 28% to 65%. The methylene blue value (MBV) for Lorient, Bruz and Polama soils is 1, 1.2 and 1.2 g/100 g, and French classification (Guide de terrassements des remblais et des couches de forme; GTR) of soil samples is A1, B5 and A1, respectively. The washing of soils with lower fine content helps to recover excellent-quality sand and gravel, which are a useful and precious resource. However, residual fine particles are a waste material. In this study, three soil formulations were used for manufacturing earth blocks. These formulations include raw soil, fines and restructured soil. In restructured soil, a fine fraction of soil smaller than 0.063 mm was mixed with 15% recycled sand. Restructuring of soil fine particles helps to improve soil matrix composition and suitability for earth bricks. Compressed-earth blocks of 4 × 4 × 16 cm were manufactured at a laboratory scale for flexural strength testing by using optimum molding moisture content and compaction through Proctor normal energy. Compressive strength tests were performed on cubic blocks of size 4 × 4 × 4 cm. Mechanical testing of bricks showed that bricks with raw soil had higher resistance with a maximum of 3.4 MPa for Lorient soil. Removal of coarse particles from soil decreased the strength of bricks considerably. Restructuring of fines with recycled sand improves their granular skeleton and increases the compressive strength and durability of bricks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Brittany soil samples: Lorient (<b>a</b>), Polama (<b>b</b>) and Bruz (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Wet processing of excavated soils.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Raw soil (<b>a</b>), mixing soil with water (<b>b</b>), wet sieving of soil (<b>c</b>) and fine particles of soil (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Samples of prismatic earth blocks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Granulometry of recycled sand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Minerology of recycled sand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Flexural and compressive strength (MPa) of earth blocks. Note: S = raw soil; F = fine soil; RS = restructured soil; Fc = compressive strength; Ft = flexural strength.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3929 KiB  
Article
Preparation Method and Benefit Analysis for Unburned Brick Using Construction Solid Waste from Residue Soil
by Xingzhong Nong, Linren Zhou, Lihua Zhai and Feng Gu
Buildings 2024, 14(10), 3213; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103213 - 9 Oct 2024
Viewed by 562
Abstract
Highly efficient resource utilization of construction solid waste has significant environmental and socioeconomic benefits. In this study, a fabrication method and process optimization of unburned brick from construction residue soil were investigated based on experiments. The effects of cementing the material content, the [...] Read more.
Highly efficient resource utilization of construction solid waste has significant environmental and socioeconomic benefits. In this study, a fabrication method and process optimization of unburned brick from construction residue soil were investigated based on experiments. The effects of cementing the material content, the raw material treatment process, the brick moisture content, and the molding method on the compressive strength of unburned brick were studied and discussed. The experimental results show that 5–20% of ordinary cement can produce a strength grade of 5 MPa–20 MPa for unburned brick, and the utilization rate of the residue soil is greater than 80%. In the case of well-dispersed residual particles, complete drying and rolling are not necessary, and soil particle size within 5 mm is beneficial for obtaining proper sand grading and low mud content, which will improve the strength of unburned brick. The pressure for the press forming of unburned brick should be 10 MPa, and the optimal moisture content of the residue-soil mixture is about 13%. The proposed residue-soil unburned brick has remarkable environmental and economic benefits with low carbon emissions, low cost, and high profit. The methods proposed and optimized in this study can provide important technical support for realizing the large-scale production of residue-soil unburned brick. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low-Carbon and Green Materials in Construction—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>XRD testing results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mineral composition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Production process of the residue-soil unburned brick.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Processing of the residue soil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Compressive strength testing process of the unburned brick.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effect of the cementing material content on the compressive strength.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Compressive strength of unburned brick with different material-processing methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Gradation curve of residue soil with different treatment processes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Molding method: (<b>a</b>) YB-2 unburned brick machine. (<b>b</b>) Press-forming equipment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effect of molding method on compressive strength of unburned brick.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Effect of molding moisture content on compressive strength.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Main equipment used for large-scale production of unburned bricks: (<b>a</b>) dryer; (<b>b</b>) vibrating sifter; (<b>c</b>) wheel mill; (<b>d</b>) mixer; (<b>e</b>) and brick machine.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 5797 KiB  
Article
The Role of Biopolymers on the Water Retention Capacity of Stabilized Sand
by Ahmed M. Al-Mahbashi and Abdullah Almajed
Sustainability 2024, 16(19), 8612; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198612 - 4 Oct 2024
Viewed by 865
Abstract
The application of biopolymers for sand stabilization has recently gained attention due to their natural composition, which makes them both environmentally friendly and of reasonable cost. Measuring the soil–water retention curve (SWRC) of biopolymers-treated sand is essential for the design, modeling, and interpretation [...] Read more.
The application of biopolymers for sand stabilization has recently gained attention due to their natural composition, which makes them both environmentally friendly and of reasonable cost. Measuring the soil–water retention curve (SWRC) of biopolymers-treated sand is essential for the design, modeling, and interpretation of the unsaturated behavior of these materials. Unsaturated shear strength, unsaturated flow, and associated retention capacity are well addressed and evaluated using SWRC. Therefore, this study examined the possible effects of biopolymers—sodium alginate (SA), guar gum (GG), and pectin (P) on the SWRC and retention capacity for stabilized sand. Apart from natural sand, three different concentrations were investigated for each biopolymer. The SWRCs were measured over the entire practical range of suction using a combination of three techniques: hanging column for low suction measurement, axis translation techniques for moderate suction measurement, and vapor equilibrium technique for high suction measurement. The results indicate significant changes in SWRC, and a new series of micropores was developed, this, in turn, extends the desaturation zone of treated sand from a low suction range (i.e., 30 kPa) to moderate to high suction levels (i.e., 10,000 kPa). The saturated water content (ws) was slightly reduced, air entry values (AEVs), and residual suction (sr) significantly increased and multiplied up to 200 and 75 times respectively. The retention capacity increased, exhibiting a dependency between the biopolymer type and suction range. The results are of great significance for both practitioner engineers and researchers in predicting the unsaturated soil functions of treated sand. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Gradation curve of the sand used in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Testing devices for the considered techniques: (<b>a</b>) hanging column, (<b>b</b>) pressure plate extractor, and (<b>c</b>) saturated salt solutions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Equilibrium process under different salt solutions, using the vapor equilibrium technique.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effect of biopolymer percentage on SWRCs: (<b>a</b>) sodium alginate, (<b>b</b>) pectin, and (<b>c</b>) guar gum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Effect of biopolymer percentage on SWRCs: (<b>a</b>) sodium alginate, (<b>b</b>) pectin, and (<b>c</b>) guar gum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A typical SWRC with its identified zones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SEM images of (<b>a</b>) natural sand, (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) specimens treated with SA, and (<b>d</b>) specimens treated with P.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of biopolymer type on SWRCs of sand at different biopolymer dosages: (<b>a</b>) 1%, (<b>b</b>) 3%, and (<b>c</b>) 5%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Changes induced by biopolymers in the main characteristics of SWRCs: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">w</span><sub>s</sub>, (<b>b</b>) AEV1, (<b>c</b>) AEV2, and (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">s</span><sub>r</sub>.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4703 KiB  
Article
The Role of a New Stabilizer in Enhancing the Mechanical Performance of Construction Residue Soils
by Xin Chen, Jing Yu, Feng Yu, Jingjing Pan and Shuaikang Li
Materials 2024, 17(17), 4293; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174293 - 30 Aug 2024
Viewed by 608
Abstract
Urban construction generates significant amounts of construction residue soil. This paper introduces a novel soil stabilizer based on industrial waste to improve its utilization. This stabilizer is primarily composed of blast furnace slag (BFS), steel slag (SS), phosphogypsum (PG), and other additives, which [...] Read more.
Urban construction generates significant amounts of construction residue soil. This paper introduces a novel soil stabilizer based on industrial waste to improve its utilization. This stabilizer is primarily composed of blast furnace slag (BFS), steel slag (SS), phosphogypsum (PG), and other additives, which enhance soil strength through physical and chemical processes. This study investigated the mechanical properties of construction residue soil cured with this stabilizer, focusing on the effects of organic matter content (Oo), stabilizer dosage (Oc), and curing age (T) on unconfined compressive strength (UCS). Additionally, water stability and wet–dry cycle tests of the stabilized soil were conducted to assess long-term performance. According to the findings, the UCS increased with the higher stabilizer dosage and longer curing periods but reduced with the higher organic matter content. A stabilizer content of 15–20% is recommended for optimal stabilization efficacy and cost-efficiency in engineering applications. The samples lost their strength when immersed in water. However, adding more stabilizers to the soil can effectively enhance its water stability. Under wet–dry cycle conditions, the UCS initially increased and then decreased, remaining lower than that of samples cured under standard conditions. The findings can provide valuable data for the practical application in construction residual soil stabilization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Mathematical Modeling of Complex Granular Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The particle size distribution curve of the soil sample and the raw materials of the stabilizer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The compaction curve of the soil sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The mineral phase of tested soil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The methods of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The relationship between the UCS of stabilized soil and the dosage of the stabilizer: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span> = 7 d; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span> = 14 d; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span> = 21 d; (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span> = 28 d.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The variation in strength performance of stabilized soil with different organic matter contents: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span> = 7 d; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span> = 14 d; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span> = 21 d; (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span> = 28 d.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The relationship between the UCS of stabilized soil and the dosage of the stabilizer: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">O</span><sub>c</sub> = 15%; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">O</span><sub>c</sub> = 20%; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">O</span><sub>c</sub> = 25%; (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">O</span><sub>c</sub> = 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The variation of UCS of stabilized soil with immersion time: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">O</span><sub>c</sub> = 20%; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">O</span><sub>c</sub> = 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The strength residual coefficients of the new stabilized soil at different immersion periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The UCS of the new stabilized soil varied with the wet–dry cycle numbers: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">O</span><sub>c</sub> = 20%; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">O</span><sub>c</sub> = 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The residual coefficients of stabilized soil under wet–dry cycling conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The cumulative mass loss rate varies with the cycle numbers.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 13539 KiB  
Article
Investigation of the Impact of Geotextile Incorporation on the Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer
by Wei Zhou, Xiujie Zhang, Hongzhong Li, Rongtao Yan, Xianlun Huang, Jianjun Gan, Jinping Zhang, Xiaoyong Cheng, Junhong Yuan and Bingxiang Yuan
Buildings 2024, 14(9), 2595; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092595 - 23 Aug 2024
Viewed by 672
Abstract
Geopolymers assume an irreplaceable position in the engineering field on account of their numerous merits, such as durability and high temperature resistance. Nevertheless, geopolymers also demonstrate brittleness. In this study, geotextiles with different layers were added to geopolymer to study its compressive strength [...] Read more.
Geopolymers assume an irreplaceable position in the engineering field on account of their numerous merits, such as durability and high temperature resistance. Nevertheless, geopolymers also demonstrate brittleness. In this study, geotextiles with different layers were added to geopolymer to study its compressive strength and stability. Laboratory materials such as alkali activators, geotextiles and granite residual soil (GRS) were utilized. The samples were characterized via XRD, TG-DTG, SEM-EDS and FT-IR. The results indicate that the toughness of geopolymer is significantly enhanced by adding geotextiles, and the strength increase is most obvious when adding one layer of geotextile: the strength increased from 2.57 Mpa to 3.26 Mpa on the 14th day, an increase of 27%. Additionally, the D-W cycle has a great influence on geotextile polymers. On the 14th day, the average strength of the D-W cyclic sample (1.935 Mpa) was 1.305 Mpa smaller than that of the naturally cured sample (3.24 Mpa), and the strength decreased by 40%. These discoveries offer a novel approach for further promoting the application of geopolymers, especially in the field of foundation reinforcement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Sustainable Building Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Picture of (<b>a</b>) soil sampling location, (<b>b</b>) SEM of original soil, (<b>c</b>) soil samples after calcination at 650 °C, (<b>d</b>) non-woven geotextile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>XRD patterns of GRS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sample preparation process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Arrangement of geotextile layers with different numbers of layers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of geotextile layer number and curing condition on compressive strength when curing for (<b>a</b>) 7 days and (<b>b</b>) 14 days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Failure state of unconfined compression test (<b>a</b>) sample without geotextile; (<b>b</b>) sample of a layer of geotextile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>XRD of (<b>a</b>) calcined soil at 650 °C; (<b>b</b>) geopolymer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>TG curve of geopolymer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SEM of N-1 fracture surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>SEM of damaged samples: (<b>a</b>) 50 μm, (<b>b</b>) 20 μm, (<b>c</b>) 2 μm, (<b>d</b>) 1 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>SEM of fibers on the polymers magnified by 10,000 times.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Mass loss of geopolymers with 0, 1, 2, and 3 geotextile layers (C-0, C-1, C-2, and C-3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Cracks in D-W cycle samples.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 16290 KiB  
Article
Research on Solidification Methods and Stabilization Mechanisms of Sulfate Saline Soils
by Sining Li, Yong Huang, Jian Sun, Rui Yu, Yubin Liu and Qiushuang Cui
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(16), 7246; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14167246 - 17 Aug 2024
Viewed by 869
Abstract
In cold regions, saline soils can cause dissolution, settlement, and salt expansion of the roadbed under the influence of freeze–thaw cycles, so they need to be stabilized during road construction. In this study, lime, fly ash (FA), and polyacrylamide (PAM) were used to [...] Read more.
In cold regions, saline soils can cause dissolution, settlement, and salt expansion of the roadbed under the influence of freeze–thaw cycles, so they need to be stabilized during road construction. In this study, lime, fly ash (FA), and polyacrylamide (PAM) were used to stabilize sulfate saline soils, and the stabilized saline soils were subjected to the unconfined compressive strength test (UCS), splitting test, and freeze–thaw cycle tests (FTs). The stabilization mechanism of the three materials on saline soils was also studied via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TG), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The test results showed that the addition of lime, FA, and PAM to saline soils can improve the mechanical properties and frost resistance of saline soils. After 28 d of curing, the UCS of FA-, PAM-, and lime-stabilized saline soils increased by at least 55%, 23%, and 1068%, respectively, and the splitting strength increased by at least 161%, 75%, and 2720%, respectively. After five freeze–thaw cycles, the residual strength ratios (BDRs) of the UCS of L2 (lime 8%), F2 (FA 11%), and P2 (PAM 1%) stabilized soils and saline soils were 71.78%, 56.42%, 39.05%, and 17.95%, respectively, and the decreasing trend tended to be stable. The saline soils stabilized by lime and FA were chemically stabilized, and their mechanical properties and frost resistance were better than the physical stabilization of PAM. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) XRD of saline soils and plain soil; (<b>b</b>) grain size distribution of saline soils.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>XRD pattern of FA and lime.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Before UCS test; (<b>b</b>) after UCS test; (<b>c</b>) before splitting strength test; (<b>d</b>) after splitting strength test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mechanical properties of stabilized soil at 28 d: (<b>a</b>) UCS; (<b>b</b>) splitting strength.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Strength residual ratio after freeze–thaw cycles: (<b>a</b>) UCS DBR of stabilized soils; (<b>b</b>) splitting strength DBR of stabilized soils.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>XRD results for saline soil solidification: (<b>a</b>) L1, L2, L3 stabilized for 7 d; (<b>b</b>) F1, F2, F3 stabilized for 7 d; (<b>c</b>) P3 stabilized for 7 d and 28 d; (<b>d</b>) L3, F3, P3 stabilized for 28 d.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SEM of saline soils.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>SEM images of the three binders stabilized for 28 d: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) L3; (<b>c</b>) F3; (<b>d</b>) P3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SEM of after 3 freeze–thaw cycles: (<b>a</b>) saline soils; (<b>b</b>) L3; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) F3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>SEM after 20 freeze–thaw cycles: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) L3 FTs = 20; (<b>c</b>) F3 FTs = 20; (<b>d</b>) P3 FTs = 20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>FTIR spectra of stabilized saline soils for 1, 2, 7, and 28 d: (<b>a</b>) L3; (<b>b</b>) F3; (<b>c</b>) P3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>TG−DSC curves of stabilized saline soils: (<b>a</b>) L3 stabilized for 28 d; (<b>b</b>) FA (<b>c</b>) FAS (<b>d</b>) FAS1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>XPS spectra of O, Ca, S, Si, and Al in FAS, FAS1 hydration 28 d, and FA: (<b>a</b>) wide range; (<b>b</b>) O 1s; (<b>c</b>) Ca 2p; (<b>d</b>) S 2p; (<b>e</b>) Si 2p; (<b>f</b>) Al 2p.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>SEM of lime solidification at 14 d: (<b>a</b>) enlarged 2000-times; (<b>b</b>) enlarged 10,000-times.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>SEM of FAS hydration at 7 d: (<b>a</b>) needle-like AFt and gel material; (<b>b</b>) short rod AFt and net gel material.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 7039 KiB  
Article
Mineralogical and Engineering Properties of Soils Derived from In Situ Weathering of Tuff in Central Java, Indonesia
by I Gde Budi Indrawan, Daniel Tamado, Mifthahul Abrar and I Wayan Warmada
Geosciences 2024, 14(8), 213; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14080213 - 10 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1140
Abstract
This paper presents the results of borehole investigations and laboratory tests carried out to characterize the soils derived from in situ weathering of tuff in Central Java, Indonesia. The 70 m thick weathering profile of the Quaternary tuff consisted of residual soil and [...] Read more.
This paper presents the results of borehole investigations and laboratory tests carried out to characterize the soils derived from in situ weathering of tuff in Central Java, Indonesia. The 70 m thick weathering profile of the Quaternary tuff consisted of residual soil and completely to highly decomposed rocks. The relatively low dry unit weight and cohesion but high water content, porosity, plastic and liquid limits, and angle of internal friction of the soils in the present study were related to the dominance of halloysite clay minerals. The established relationships to predict soil shear strength parameters from the soil plasticity index and standard penetration test (SPT) N-values were examined, and linear and non-linear relationships for soils derived from in situ weathering of tuff were proposed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil-Structure Interactions in Underground Construction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area according to PT JJB [<a href="#B22-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. The inset map and digital elevation model are from the Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia [<a href="#B23-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Borehole locations and depths from PT JJB [<a href="#B22-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">22</a>] are plotted on the engineering geological map and cross section developed in the present study. The material weathering grade in each borehole estimated from the present study is drawn. The base map is from the Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia [<a href="#B23-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Typical outcrop of brown residual soil and yellowish brown completely and highly decomposed tuffs. RS: residual soil; CD: completely decomposed tuff; HD: highly decomposed tuff.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Typical core samples. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Residual soils at 2–3 m and 9–10 m depths; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) completely decomposed tuffs at 14–15 m and 24–25 m depths; (<b>e,f</b>) Highly decomposed tuff at 69–70 m depth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Photomicrographs of core samples classified as crystal tuffs in parallel polarized light (<b>left</b>) and crossed polarized light (<b>right</b>) [<a href="#B1-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">1</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Completely decomposed tuff (17–18 m depth); (<b>b</b>) highly decomposed tuff (31–32 m depth); (<b>c</b>) highly decomposed tuff (67–68 m depth).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Profile of clay mineral content identified from petrographic analyses; (<b>b</b>) profile of common minerals identified from XRD analyses (data points from PT JJB [<a href="#B22-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">22</a>]); (<b>c</b>) profile of soil classification based on the USCS (data points are partly from Tamado [<a href="#B2-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">2</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Profile of water content; (<b>b</b>) profile of bulk unit weight; (<b>c</b>) profile of dry unit weight; (<b>d</b>) profile of porosity; (<b>e</b>) profile of saturation degree; (<b>f</b>) profile of specific gravity (data points are partly from Tamado [<a href="#B2-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">2</a>]). Dashed line indicates general trend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Profile of plastic limit; (<b>b</b>) profile of liquid limit; (<b>c</b>) profile of plasticity index; (<b>d</b>) profile of liquidity index (data points are partly from Tamado [<a href="#B2-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">2</a>]). Dashed line indicates general trend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Profile of soil penetration resistance (data points from [<a href="#B12-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">12</a>]); (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) profiles of soil cohesion and angle of internal friction (data points are partly from Tamado [<a href="#B2-geosciences-14-00213" class="html-bibr">2</a>]). Dashed line indicates general trend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Relationship between ratio of cohesion to SPT N-values and plasticity index; (<b>b</b>) relationship between cohesion and plasticity index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Relationships between angle of internal friction and plasticity index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Data points in <a href="#geosciences-14-00213-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a> are plotted to establish the N<sub>60</sub>-c<sub>u</sub> relationship. The published N-S<sub>u</sub> and N<sub>60</sub>-S<sub>u</sub> relationships for fine-grained, clay, and residual soils are plotted for comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>N<sub>60</sub>-c<sub>u</sub> relationships for the soils from 0 to 30 m depth and from 30 to 70 m depth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Relationships between penetration resistance and angle of internal friction and resistance to movement.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 9647 KiB  
Article
Experimental Study on Shear Creep Characteristics of Residual Soil with Different Stone Content
by Jinyu Dong, Tanyu Wang and Yawen Zhao
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(15), 6829; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156829 - 5 Aug 2024
Viewed by 631
Abstract
The residual soil on a slope can slowly move downward under the influence of gravity, forming a creep landslide. These types of landslides are known for their extensive coverage, significant magnitude, and prolonged duration of hazard. A systematic study of the creep properties [...] Read more.
The residual soil on a slope can slowly move downward under the influence of gravity, forming a creep landslide. These types of landslides are known for their extensive coverage, significant magnitude, and prolonged duration of hazard. A systematic study of the creep properties of creep landslide geotechnical bodies is essential for the analysis of the deformation process and long-term safety evaluation of landslides. This paper focuses on studying a creep landslide involving residual soil in western Henan Province. The creep characteristics of residual soil with different stone content are investigated through direct shear creep experiments. The findings reveal that stone content has a profound impact on the creep behavior of residual soil. As the stone content of the soil increased, the structure of the test soil changed significantly, resulting in a gradual decrease in its shear creep. The Burgers model can effectively fit the deceleration creep and steady-state creep stages of the residual soil. With the increase in stone content, the four parameters of the Burgers model show a significant increase, with the instantaneous elasticity coefficient G1 and the viscosity coefficient η1 experiencing more noticeable changes. The average long-term strength of specimens with different stone content is only 54% of their instantaneous strength. Additionally, as the stone content increases, the ratio of long-term strength to instantaneous strength also increases. Notably, the long-term strength of specimens with 10–30% stone content is significantly lower than that of specimens with 50–70% stone content. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Site conditions of the landslide. (<b>a</b>) Landslide engineering geological plan, (<b>b</b>) landslide 1-1 ‘ engineering geological profile, (<b>c</b>) tensile cracks caused by slope sliding, and (<b>d</b>) accumulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>ZJ50-2G-Large direct shear test machine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mixing of sheared soil samples. (<b>a</b>) Mixing process and (<b>b</b>) sample after mixing with water.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Particle size distribution of specimens with different stone content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Loading creep curves respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Loading creep curves respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Final creep strain of specimens with different stone content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The schematic diagram of shear surface of samples with different stone content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Burgers creep model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Fitting curve of Burgers model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The variation of Burgers model parameters with stone content under secondary loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Stress–strain isochronous curve point of 50% stone content specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Uniformity coefficient and curvature coefficient with different stone content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Instantaneous shear strength and long-term strength of specimens with different stone content.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 65844 KiB  
Article
Application of Guar Gum Treatment of Basalt Residual-Soil Shallow Slope in Early Ecological Restoration
by Xianfei Shen, Lina Wang, Xuemin Pan, Bijin Yang, Jiayuan Han and Lianxing Zhang
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6676; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156676 - 4 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1116
Abstract
This paper found that environmentally friendly guar gum biopolymers are helpful for stopping the erosion of basalt residual-soil shallow slopes, while also improving the problems of poor stability, difficult growth of early vegetation, and weak initial resistance to the rainfall scouring of these [...] Read more.
This paper found that environmentally friendly guar gum biopolymers are helpful for stopping the erosion of basalt residual-soil shallow slopes, while also improving the problems of poor stability, difficult growth of early vegetation, and weak initial resistance to the rainfall scouring of these slopes under extreme climatic conditions. Then, to illustrate the effects of the guar gum treatment, laboratory tests have been conducted, including a soil strength test, water retention and water absorption tests, a disintegration test, and a simulated rainfall erosion test, and the pattern of its effect on vegetation growth has been explored. The results indicate that as the content of guar gum increases, both the cohesion and angle of internal friction exhibit a trend of first increasing and then decreasing; the angle of internal friction varies within a range of 21° to 26°. The evaporation rate, water absorption rate, and disintegration rate of this guar gum-treated soil were significantly reduced, while the cracking of the surface layer was significantly improved. The disintegration rate of the soil is only about 2%, as the guar gum content is greater than 1%. Moreover, there is no sign indicating that vegetation germination was affected by the guar gum, meaning that it maintains a favorable environment for vegetation to grow. Guar gum-cured slopes were significantly protected under heavy rainfall washout conditions, with a 94.85% reduction in total soil loss from the slope surface compared to untreated slopes. Since the pores of soil are filled with guar gum hydrogel, the erosion resistance of soil is greatly enhanced. The results of this study will provide a scientific basis for engineering the protection of shallow slopes of basalt residual soils. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Photographs of the soil extraction site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Grain size distribution curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of disintegration device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic diagram of rainfall simulator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationship between guar gum content and shear strength parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relationship between curing time and shear strength parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Variation of water content of specimens with drying time and infiltration time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Fissure development in different specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Variation of water loss rate and water absorption rate with drying time and infiltration time of specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Disintegration rates for different specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Disintegration process of untreated and guar gum-treated specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Germination rate of vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Actual vegetation growth at 7, 14 and 28 days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Relationship between total soil loss and rainfall time for untreated and guar gum-treated slopes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The erosion process of untreated and guar gum-treated slopes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Relationship between total soil loss and rainfall time on a slope treated with a combination of guar gum and vegetation.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3176 KiB  
Article
Effects of Freeze–Thaw Cycles and the Prefreezing Water Content on the Soil Pore Size Distribution
by Ruiqi Jiang, Xuefeng Bai, Xianghao Wang, Renjie Hou, Xingchao Liu and Hanbo Yang
Water 2024, 16(14), 2040; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142040 - 18 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1229
Abstract
Volumetric changes induced by soil moisture phase changes can lead to pore system redistribution in freezing and thawing soil, which in turn affects soil strength and stability. The prefreezing water content and the number of freeze–thaw cycles (FTCs) affecting key factors of soil [...] Read more.
Volumetric changes induced by soil moisture phase changes can lead to pore system redistribution in freezing and thawing soil, which in turn affects soil strength and stability. The prefreezing water content and the number of freeze–thaw cycles (FTCs) affecting key factors of soil pore changes, and they determine the volumetric change magnitude and frequency during ice–water phase transitions. This study aims to reveal the effect of the prefreezing water content and the number of freeze–thaw cycles on the pore size distribution (PSD) of black soil, meadow soil and chernozem, which account for the largest arable land area in Heilongjiang Province, China. In situ soil samples with different prefreezing water contents were subjected to 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, and 20 FTCs, and then nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was used to quantify the PSD. It was shown that the pore sizes of the three soil types spanned multiple orders of magnitude, ranging from 0.001 to 100 μm overall. The inflection point of the cumulative porosity curves of all three soils occurred near 0.1 μm. For black soil and chernozem with high prefreezing water contents, when the number of FTCs reached 10 or 20, the soil self-weight led to thaw settlement, which reduced the difference in the total porosity of the soils with varying moisture contents. The initial FTC exerts the most significant influence on the pore structure. The impact of the prefreezing water content on soil pore structure diminishes as the number of FTCs increases. The plant root residues rendered meadow soil less sensitive to water content differences after the first FTCs but also limited the development of macropores during the late freeze–thaw period. The prefreezing water content alters the distribution of soil moisture before freezing and has a greater influence on the pore distribution of frozen-thawed soils compared to the cumulative effect of multiple FTCs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Soil profiles at the sampling sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Temperature and water content variation curves of black soil at different depths. (<b>a</b>) Soil temperature; (<b>b</b>) Water content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>T<sub>2</sub> spectrum distribution of black soil. Note: prefreezing water content: (<b>a</b>) 10%; (<b>b</b>) 20%; (<b>c</b>) 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>T<sub>2</sub> spectrum distribution of meadow soil. Note: prefreezing water content: (<b>a</b>) 10%; (<b>b</b>) 20%; (<b>c</b>) 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>T<sub>2</sub> spectrum distribution of chernozem. Note: prefreezing water content: (<b>a</b>) 10%; (<b>b</b>) 20%; (<b>c</b>) 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>PSD of the black soil with different prefreezing water contents under different numbers of FTCs. Note: (<b>a</b>) 10%; (<b>b</b>) 20%; (<b>c</b>) 30%. Note: different letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>PSD of the meadow soil with different prefreezing water contents under different numbers of FTCs. Note: (<b>a</b>) 10%; (<b>b</b>) 20%; (<b>c</b>) 30%. Note: different letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>PSD of the chernozem with different prefreezing water contents under different numbers of FTCs. Note: (<b>a</b>) 10%; (<b>b</b>) 20%; (<b>c</b>) 30%. Note: different letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Cumulative porosity and pore volume percentage curves of the soils for different numbers of FTCs. Note: (<b>a</b>) black soil; (<b>b</b>) meadow soil; (<b>c</b>) chernozem.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Changes in the pore size fractions of the soils with different prefreezing water contents under different numbers of FTCs. Note: (<b>a</b>) black soil; (<b>b</b>) meadow soil; (<b>c</b>) chernozem.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 5662 KiB  
Article
Multi-Factor Orthogonal Experiments and Enhancement Mechanisms of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soda Residue Cement Lime Soil
by Wenbo Cheng, Wei Yin, Xiaoya Wang, Quan Xu, Guodong Wang, Jun Cao and Shengxue Zhu
Buildings 2024, 14(7), 2189; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072189 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 816
Abstract
In order to study the effects of soda residue content, particle size, moisture content, and curing age on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of soda residue cement lime soil (SRCLS), a 4-factor, 4-level orthogonal experimental design was employed in this study. Different conditions [...] Read more.
In order to study the effects of soda residue content, particle size, moisture content, and curing age on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of soda residue cement lime soil (SRCLS), a 4-factor, 4-level orthogonal experimental design was employed in this study. Different conditions of SRCLS UCS and their impacts were tested and analyzed. The internal microstructure and hydration products of SRCLS were studied using SEM and XRD to explore the strengthening mechanism of SR in SRCLS. The results indicate that as the soda residue content gradually increased, SRCLS UCS initially increased and then decreased, with a maximum increase of up to 67%. With increasing soda residue particle size and moisture content, the UCS of SRCLS gradually decreased. The optimized mix ratio was determined to be soda residue:cement:lime:soil = 3%:3%:6%:100%, with the soda residue dried naturally and an ideal particle size of 0.15 mm. The factors influencing the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of SRCLS, in order of importance, are curing age, soda residue content, moisture content, and particle size of SR. Among these, curing age and soda residue content have a significant impact on the UCS. An adequate amount of SR can act as a fine aggregate filler, replace lime, promote cement hydration, and enhance chloride ion binding. This improves the grading of SRCLS materials and facilitates the formation of cementitious products from AFm, AFt, and Friedel’s salt, resulting in denser and stronger SRCLS materials. The research findings provide a reference for the mix design of SRCLS and the large-scale utilization of waste soda residue. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Soil–Geosynthetic Composite Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Main composition of SRCLS: (<b>a</b>) soda residue; (<b>b</b>) lime; (<b>c</b>) cement; (<b>d</b>) soil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>SEM micrographs of SR: (<b>a</b>) fresh SR; (<b>b</b>) air-dried SR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Internal structure of the soil mass: (<b>a</b>) 2000×; (<b>b</b>) 4000×.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Experimental procedure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of SR content on the UCS of SRCLS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effect of particle size on the UCS of SRCLS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of moisture content on the UCS of SRCLS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effect of curing period on the UCS of SRCLS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SRCLS UCS range analysis results: (A) the SR content, (B) SR particle size, (C) SR moisture content, and (D) curing age.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Material strength characteristic curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>In-situ images of SRCLS specimens: (<b>a</b>) SR = 0%; (<b>b</b>) SR = 3%, and (<b>c</b>) SR = 9%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Microstructure of SRCLS: (<b>a</b>) SR = 0%; (<b>b</b>) SR = 3%, and (<b>c</b>) SR = 9%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Component analysis of SRCLS: (<b>a</b>) SR = 0%; (<b>b</b>) SR = 3%, and (<b>c</b>) SR = 9%.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop