Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (3,130)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = reinforced concrete structures

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 5861 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Seismic Damage Assessment of Resilient Concrete Columns Using Drift Ratio-Based Fractal Dimension
by Bunka Son, Ganggang Li, Zhiwei Luo and Yuping Sun
Materials 2024, 17(23), 5850; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17235850 - 28 Nov 2024
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to develop assessment models to quantitatively evaluate the seismic damage caused to resilient concrete columns intended for buildings located in strong-earthquake-prone regions such as Japan and China. The proposed damage assessment models are based on the fractal [...] Read more.
The objective of this paper is to develop assessment models to quantitatively evaluate the seismic damage caused to resilient concrete columns intended for buildings located in strong-earthquake-prone regions such as Japan and China. The proposed damage assessment models are based on the fractal analysis of crack patterns on the surface of damaged concrete columns and expressed in the form of a fractal dimension (FD) versus transient drift ratio relationship. To calibrate the proposed damage assessment models, a total of eighty images of crack patterns for eight concrete columns were utilized. All the columns were reinforced by weakly bonded ultra-high-strength (WBUHS) rebars and tested under reversed cyclic loading. The experimental variables covered the shear span ratio of the column, the concrete strength, the axial load ratio, and the amount of steel in the WBUHS rebars. A box-counting algorithm was adopted to calculate or derive the FD of the crack pattern corresponding to each transient drift ratio. The test results reveal that the FD is an efficient image-based quantitative indicator of seismic damage degree for resilient concrete columns and correlates strongly with the transient drift ratio and is subjected to the influence of the shear span ratio. The influence of the other experimental variables on the derived FDs is, if any, little. Based on the test results, a linear equation was developed to define the relationships between the FD and transient drift ratio, and a multi-linear equation was formulated to relate the transient drift ratio to the residual drift ratio, an important index adopted in current design guidelines to measure the repairability of damaged concrete structures. To further verify the efficiency of the drift ratio-based FD in seismic damage assessment, the correlation between the FD and relative stiffness loss (RSL), an indicator used to measure the overall damage degree of concrete structures, was also examined. The driven FD exhibited very strong correlation with RSL, and an empirical equation was developed to reliably assess the overall seismic damage degree of resilient concrete columns with an FD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Building Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Remapping of sample image of the crack pattern taken at R = 1.0% (specimen S17N10FC50); (<b>a</b>) original; (<b>b</b>) remapped.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of dividing the target by boxes with the size <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>a</b>) H; (<b>b</b>) H/2; (<b>c</b>) H/4; (<b>d</b>) H/8; (<b>e</b>) H/16; (<b>f</b>) H/32.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Example of dividing the target by boxes with the size <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>a</b>) H; (<b>b</b>) H/2; (<b>c</b>) H/4; (<b>d</b>) H/8; (<b>e</b>) H/16; (<b>f</b>) H/32.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The driven FD for the exemplar image taken at R = 1.0% (specimen S17N10FC50).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart of calculating FD using box-counting algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Reinforcement details and dimensions of specimens (in mm): (<b>a</b>) elevation; (<b>b</b>) section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Loading apparatus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Definition of drift ratio R and loading protocol: (<b>a</b>) definition of R; (<b>b</b>) loading program.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Observed propagation of cracks for specimens with a/D ratio of 1.7: (<b>a</b>) S17N10FC50; (<b>b</b>) S17N21FC50; (<b>c</b>) S17N10FC40; (<b>d</b>) S17N21FC40.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Observed propagation of cracks for specimens with a/D ratio of 2.5: (<b>a</b>) S25N10FC50; (<b>b</b>) S25N21FC50; (<b>c</b>) S25N10FC40; (<b>d</b>) S25N21FC40.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Measured V-R relationships: (<b>a</b>) specimens with a/D = 1.7; (<b>b</b>) specimens with a/D = 2.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Idealization of damage states for ductile concrete structures and/or columns [<a href="#B16-materials-17-05850" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B17-materials-17-05850" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Measured residual crack widths: (<b>a</b>) flexural crack; (<b>b</b>) shear crack.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Measured residual drift ratios: (<b>a</b>) specimens with a/D = 1.7; (<b>b</b>) specimens with a/D = 2.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Example of propagation of crack pattern and corresponding FDs (S17N10FC50).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Fractal dimension (FD) versus transient drift ratio (R<sub>p</sub>) relationships: (<b>a</b>) specimens with a/D = 1.7; (<b>b</b>) specimens with a/D = 2.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Definitions of initial stiffness and secant stiffness at different loads and drift ratios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Relative stiffness loss (RSL) versus fractal dimension relationships: (<b>a</b>) specimens with a/D = 1.7; (<b>b</b>) specimens with a/D = 2.5.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7244 KiB  
Article
Small-Scale and Large-Scale Modeling of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Girders
by Aleksandar Landović, Arpad Čeh, Anka Starčev-Ćurčin and Miloš Šešlija
Buildings 2024, 14(12), 3812; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123812 - 28 Nov 2024
Abstract
Experimental and computational research on the behavior of small-scale and large-scale fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) beams is presented in this paper. The experimental part included the small-scale bending tests, which were conducted on three 1.3 m long by 0.1 m wide by 0.15 m [...] Read more.
Experimental and computational research on the behavior of small-scale and large-scale fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) beams is presented in this paper. The experimental part included the small-scale bending tests, which were conducted on three 1.3 m long by 0.1 m wide by 0.15 m high rectangular simply supported beams, and the large-scale test that was conducted on 12.8 m long by 0.2 m wide by 1.3 m two-chords girder. The concrete mixture in the large-scale test was designed with environmentally more justifiable supplementary materials (binder and fibers), striving for sustainable excellence. To accurately predict the mechanical behavior of tested models, a numerical model incorporating the real nonlinear materials laws is used. A numerical model based on finite element analysis (FEA) is developed. The FEA model is created using a smeared crack approach with a constitutive law for the tensile behavior of FRC derived from an inverse analysis based on prism bending tests. The numerical model is validated against experimental results and the accuracy of numerical predictions based on finite element modeling showed a good correlation with the test data. The FEA-based model makes it easier to predict how FRC structures fail under transversal loading and can serve as a foundation for creating new design processes. Additionally, the presented research is aimed at the feasibility of recycled steel FRC field application in building structures. The usage of recycled steel fibers could achieve environmental benefits through the adoption of sustainable materials. The present study showcased the possibility of modeling reinforced concrete structural building parts made with recycled steel fibers using available software. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dimensions of the beam and reinforcement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Test setup of the beam; (<b>b</b>) cracks on the side of the beam; (<b>c</b>) crack at failure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The geometry of the girder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Reinforcement of the girder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Applied recycled steel fibers; (<b>b</b>) distribution of recycled steel fibers in concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Girder with second-phase loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Lifting of the support; (<b>b</b>) cracks in the final load phase at the measuring Point G; (<b>c</b>) cracks in the final load phase at the measuring Point A.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Crack distribution and width in the final load phase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Finite element mesh, supports, and loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Schematic representation of the maximum load.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Reactions of a continuous beam due to unit distributed load.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Finite element mesh, supports, and loading of the large girder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Stress–strain relationship of reinforcing steel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Stress–strain response of FRC in tension.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Relationship between load and deflection at the mid-span: (<b>a</b>) experimental and FEM results; (<b>b</b>) characteristic points from FEM analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Normal stresses in beam: (<b>a</b>) before crack development; (<b>b</b>) after crack development.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Cracks in beam at peak load.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Normal stresses in reinforcement at peak load.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Relationship between load and deflection at the mid-span.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Deformations of the girder: (<b>a</b>) at service load; (<b>b</b>) at peak load.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Normal stresses in girder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Cracks due to self-weight and maximal experimental load.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Cracks in beam at peak load.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 4289 KiB  
Article
Extending a Macro-Element Approach for the Modeling of 3D Masonry Structures Under Transient Dynamic Loading
by Damien Decret, Yann Malecot, Yannick Sieffert, Florent Vieux-Champagne and Laurent Daudeville
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 11080; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311080 - 28 Nov 2024
Abstract
Masonry structures, particularly those used in developing countries and in historic buildings, typically consist of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls connected by timber or reinforced concrete elements. This study proposes enhancements to the existing two-dimensional (2D) deformable frame model (DFM) to enhance its ability [...] Read more.
Masonry structures, particularly those used in developing countries and in historic buildings, typically consist of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls connected by timber or reinforced concrete elements. This study proposes enhancements to the existing two-dimensional (2D) deformable frame model (DFM) to enhance its ability in simulating masonry walls with a specific focus on accurately predicting the transient dynamic response of three-dimensional (3D) masonry structures while maintaining a minimal number of degrees of freedom (DOF). For the modeling of URM walls, the DFM framework employs elastic beams and diagonal struts with nonlinear constitutive behavior. Structural elements, such as reinforced concrete or timber reinforcements, are represented using conventional beam finite elements. This paper first reviewed the current DFM configuration, which primarily addresses the in-plane (IP) behavior of URM structures. It then introduced modifications tailored for 3D structural analysis. The reliability of the enhanced model was validated through two approaches. First, a modal analysis compared the results from the updated DFM with those from a reference 3D model based on cubic finite elements. Second, a shaking table experiment conducted on a half-scale masonry house was simulated. The findings demonstrate that, despite its limited number of DOF, the updated DFM effectively captures the main natural vibration modes. Furthermore, it shows the model’s ability to predict the nonlinear transient dynamic response of 3D masonry structures with accuracy and limited computational time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>DFM’s schematic representation and its integration into the modeling of a wall for IP analysis [<a href="#B23-applsci-14-11080" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Force/displacement curve of the diagonal strut [<a href="#B23-applsci-14-11080" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The DFM for 3D modeling with kinematics defined in the global orthonormal coordinate system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Definition of the height and the width of the influence of the DFM beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Kinematics of the beam elements of the DFM defined in the local orthonormal coordinate system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Intersection of two walls: (<b>a</b>) intersection modeled with the DFM; (<b>b</b>) cross-section of the intersection seen from above.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Colored areas show the areas of influence for nodes: (<b>a</b>) case when the node is not part of two perpendicular walls; (<b>b</b>) case when the node is part of two perpendicular walls.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Examples of the mesh used for the square wall: (<b>a</b>) 8 × 8 mesh with the DFM; (<b>b</b>) 20 × 30 × 5 mesh with the 3D cubic FE model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mode shapes and frequencies for the primary modes computed with the 10 × 10 DFM and the reference 3D FE model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Evolution of error in determining the modes, as depicted in <a href="#applsci-14-11080-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>, which were analyzed in relation to the mesh size.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Evolution of the natural frequency value of the 3rd mode analyzed in relation to the mesh size.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Schemes of the five-wall structure for the modal analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Mesh for the five-wall structure with openings: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>DFM</mi> <mo>−</mo> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>2; (<b>b</b>) 3D FE model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Mode shapes of the five-wall structure with openings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Evolution of the error for the determination of the primary modes with the mesh size.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Schemes of the reduced scale house.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The tested masonry house [<a href="#B31-applsci-14-11080" class="html-bibr">31</a>]: (<b>a</b>) house construction; (<b>b</b>) the roof truss and its connection with masonry house.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>The frequency and time-based data of the seismic signal: (<b>a</b>) eesponse spectrum of the accelerogram; (<b>b</b>) ground acceleration of the Guadeloupe seismic signal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Positions of the cable sensors on the north wall of the reduced scale house.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Modeling of the URM house: (<b>a</b>) the timber frames around openings, and (<b>b</b>) mass distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>(<b>a</b>) Mode 1: 14.2 Hz, effective mass = 49.6%; and (<b>b</b>) Mode 2: 25.3 Hz, effective mass = 24.6%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>The experimental and calculated displacement histories of the house at Points 6 and 7.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 7886 KiB  
Article
Seismic Resilience of CRC- vs. RC-Reinforced Buildings: A Long-Term Evaluation
by Moab Maidi, Gili Lifshitz Sherzer, Igor Shufrin and Erez Gal
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 11079; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311079 - 28 Nov 2024
Abstract
Corrosion-induced degradation in concrete and reinforced concrete (RC) structures, often initiated within the first few decades of their lifespan, significantly challenges seismic resistance. While existing research tools can assess performance, they fall short in predicting changes in seismic resistance resulting from alterations in [...] Read more.
Corrosion-induced degradation in concrete and reinforced concrete (RC) structures, often initiated within the first few decades of their lifespan, significantly challenges seismic resistance. While existing research tools can assess performance, they fall short in predicting changes in seismic resistance resulting from alterations in the core properties of RC structures. To bridge this gap, we introduce a numerical seismic resistance prediction method (SRPM) specifically designed to predict changes in the seismic resistance of structures, including those reinforced with carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP), known for its non-corrosive properties. This study utilizes classical models to estimate corrosiveness and employs these models alongside section strength predictions to gauge durability. The nonlinear static pushover analysis (POA) model is implemented utilizing SAP-2000 and Response-2000 software. A comparative analysis between steel-reinforced and carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer concrete (CRC) structures reveals distinct differences in their seismic resistance over time. Notably, steel-reinforced structures experience a significant decrease in their ability to dissipate seismic energy, losing 54.4% of their capacity after 170 years. In contrast, CFRP-reinforced structures exhibit a much slower degradation rate, with only 25.5% reduction over the same period. The discrepancy demonstrates CFRP’s superior durability and ability to maintain structural integrity in the face of seismic stresses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Seismic and Energy Retrofitting of Existing Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Methodology framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Predicted long-term compressive and tensile strengths for plain concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The predictive expansion and loss of compressive strength (X top refers to compressive strength degradation) of concrete over time (X bottom relates to time), analyzed by Diab et al. [<a href="#B31-applsci-14-11079" class="html-bibr">31</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation between time and the expansion of corrosion, alongside the consequent reduction in steel reinforcement area, based on the predictive equations presented in [<a href="#B9-applsci-14-11079" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The trend of CFRP SR over time, highlighting the linear decrease in material strength, as provided by [<a href="#B32-applsci-14-11079" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The reduction coefficient for concrete compressive strength as a function of corrosion penetration, as reported by Di Sarno and Pugliese [<a href="#B4-applsci-14-11079" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Predicted long-term compressive strength of corrosive concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Predicted long-term behavior of corrosive concrete: (<b>a</b>) stress–strain curve; (<b>b</b>) modulus of elasticity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Basic presentation of a reinforced concrete bending frame for POA with a triangular pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>DEM procedure through three key representations: (<b>a</b>) the initial shear capacity curve of the structure at the beginning of its lifespan, (<b>b</b>) the capacity curve at N years, and (<b>c</b>) two distinct periods together.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Theoretical seismic resistance prediction method. (<b>a</b>) Shear capacity curves for the same structure across various ages. (<b>b</b>) Trend of decrease in resistance factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Case frame geometry: this illustration showcases the beams and columns, highlighting the longitudinal reinforcement within the cross-sections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Mechanical properties of the CFRP reinforcement [<a href="#B50-applsci-14-11079" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Long-term loss of strength of RC and CRC concretes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Interaction of capacity curves for an RC structure over time. Comparison at CC t = 0 to (<b>a</b>) t = 20, (<b>b</b>) t = 45, (<b>c</b>) t = 70, (<b>d</b>) t = 95, (<b>e</b>) t = 120, (<b>f</b>) t = 145, and (<b>g</b>) t = 170 years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Trends in seismic performance of a case RC structure over time: (<b>a</b>) UCR; (<b>b</b>) YDR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Interaction of capacity curves for a CRC structure over time. At (<b>a</b>) t = 0, t = 20, (<b>b</b>) t = 45, (<b>c</b>) t = 70, (<b>d</b>) t = 95, (<b>e</b>) t = 120, (<b>f</b>) t = 145, and (<b>g</b>) t = 170 years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Trends in seismic performance of a case CRC structure over time. (<b>a</b>) UCR and (<b>b</b>) YDR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>RCF prediction curves for RC and CRC structures.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 1696 KiB  
Review
Assessing Seismic Vulnerability Methods for RC-Frame Buildings Pre- and Post-Earthquake
by Mabor Achol Samuel, Ergang Xiong, Mahmood Haris, Beco Chenadaire Lekeufack, Yupeng Xie and Yufei Han
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10392; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310392 - 27 Nov 2024
Viewed by 286
Abstract
The seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings has been an important issue, especially in earthquake-prone regions with limited seismic design codes such as South Sudan. Improving the seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings is critical for maintaining structural functionality under normal service [...] Read more.
The seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings has been an important issue, especially in earthquake-prone regions with limited seismic design codes such as South Sudan. Improving the seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings is critical for maintaining structural functionality under normal service loads and for rapid recovery after natural disasters such as earthquakes. This research aims to thoroughly assess the methods used to evaluate the seismic vulnerability of RC frame structures in pre- and post-earthquake scenarios. The primary objective is to provide a comprehensive framework that integrates empirical, analytical, and experimental methods, categorizing existing assessment methods and proposing improvements for resource-constrained environments. However, empirical methods have always used historical earthquake data to estimate potential damage. In contrast, analytical methods have used computational tools such as fragility curves to assess the probability of damage at different seismic intensities. Additionally, experimental methods, such as shaking table tests and pseudo-dynamic analyses, have validated theoretical predictions and provided insights into structural behavior under simulated conditions. Furthermore, key findings highlight critical vulnerabilities in RC buildings, quantify damage probabilities, and compare the strengths and limitations of different assessment methods. However, challenges such as limited data availability, computational limitations, and difficulties replicating actual conditions in test setups highlight areas for improvement. By addressing these challenges, the review provides recommendations for future studies, including integrating advanced computational and regional hazard characterization methods, improving experimental methods to enhance the accuracy of vulnerability assessments, and ultimately supporting the design of more resilient RC structures and increasing disaster preparedness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The procedure of seismic risks and seismic vulnerability index assessment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Vulnerability index functions corresponding to the damage factor (d) and peak ground acceleration (PGA) across various vulnerability indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A flowchart to estimate the vulnerability index (SVI).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3963 KiB  
Article
Flexural Strength of Structural Beams Cast Using Combined Normal-Weight and Lightweight Concrete Mixtures
by Ali Jahami, Lynn Dayaa, Joseph J. Assaad, Oussama Baalbaki and Jamal Khatib
Buildings 2024, 14(12), 3787; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123787 - 27 Nov 2024
Viewed by 211
Abstract
Limited investigations have evaluated the potential of using layered sections of normal-weight and lightweight concrete (NWC and LWC) mixtures in structural beams and slabs. The main objective of this paper is to assess the flexural strength properties of layered reinforced concrete (RC) beams, [...] Read more.
Limited investigations have evaluated the potential of using layered sections of normal-weight and lightweight concrete (NWC and LWC) mixtures in structural beams and slabs. The main objective of this paper is to assess the flexural strength properties of layered reinforced concrete (RC) beams, which help conserve natural resources and reduce construction weight. Six RC beams cast with different NWC/LWC combinations are tested to determine the damage patterns, concrete strains, ultimate load, displacements at failure, and ductility. The test results showed that the LWC cast in the tension zone (and up to the neutral axis) has a negligible effect on the beam’s stiffness and ultimate load since the overall behavior remains governed by the yielding of tensile steel reinforcement. Nevertheless, the deflection at failure and ductility seem to gradually curtail when the NWC is partially replaced by LWC at different elevations across the beam’s cross-section. A finite element analysis using ABAQUS software 6.14 is performed, and the results are compared with experimental data for model validation. Such data can be of interest to structural engineers and consultants aiming for optimized design of slabs and beams using layered concrete casting, which helps reduce the overall construction weight while maintaining the structural integrity of members. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Gradation curves for cement, fine aggregates, and coarse aggregates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Lightweight aggregates under manufacturing and curing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Set-up for the three-point loading along with the beam reinforcement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Six different casting scenarios for the tested RC beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Finite element 3D modeling and meshing using ABAQUS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Failure patterns for tested RC beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Load vs. mid-span deflection curves for all tested RC beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effect of concrete type on deflection at failure and ductility.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Strain distribution from Demec points at different load levels along with the depth of neutral axis at 30 kN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Experimental vs. FEM comparison of load vs. mid-span deflection curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Damage field distribution at different load levels for B1, B3, B5, and B6 (0 for undamaged material and 1 for fully damaged).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3753 KiB  
Article
Seismic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Building Frames Based on Interval Assessment of the Coefficient of Permissible Damage
by Ashot Tamrazyan and Tatiana Matseevich
Buildings 2024, 14(12), 3776; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123776 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 220
Abstract
The main method for assessing the seismic resistance of buildings in the standards of most countries is the linear-spectral method. This method allows for the calculation of the spatial model of a building for seismic load in the elastic range without resorting to [...] Read more.
The main method for assessing the seismic resistance of buildings in the standards of most countries is the linear-spectral method. This method allows for the calculation of the spatial model of a building for seismic load in the elastic range without resorting to direct integration of the equations of motion. Nonlinear characteristics of reinforced concrete structure materials are usually considered integrally using the reduction factor. However, the values of this factor in the Russian standards are not sufficiently substantiated, as the later studies show. To determine the coefficient of permissible damage (reduction factor), six reinforced concrete frames were considered, with different parameters such as span length, number of spans, and number of floors. The design parameters of beams and columns (section sizes, reinforcement, etc.) were preliminarily selected based on the calculation using the linear-spectral method. In the second stage, numerical modeling was carried out in the OpenSEES PC to implement the pushover analysis procedure. Then, the coefficient of permissible damage was estimated by processing the capacity curves obtained on the basis of nonlinear static calculation. The value of the sought coefficients is practically not affected by the number of stores of the frame; however, with an increase in the number of spans, the coefficient K1 increases, which is explained by a decrease in the plasticity of the system. On average, for the frames under consideration, the coefficient K1 was 0.526, which is 1.5 times greater than the coefficient proposed in modern Russian standards, K1 = 0.35. The results obtained on the basis of pushover analysis are compared with the coefficients K1 determined through the values of the average degree of damage (d) of the buildings according to the modified seismic scale MMSK-86. For various types of reinforced concrete frame buildings, K1 = 0.51 was obtained. It is recommended that the coefficient K1 for reinforced concrete frame buildings should be increased to a value of at least K1 = 0.5 in the Russian standard. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Safety and Optimization of Building Structures—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>To determine the reduction coefficient: 1—linear elastic system; 2—nonlinear system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The reinforced concrete frames under consideration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Calculation scheme of reinforced concrete frame P-6-3-5 in PC OpenSEES.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Calculated response spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Material deformation diagrams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Horizontal loads on the floors of the frames with (<b>a</b>) 5 and (<b>b</b>) 7 stories.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>To determine the coefficient of permissible damage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Reinforcement scheme of frame elements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The distribution of chord rotations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Bearing capacity curves of reinforced concrete frames.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Calculation example for frame P-6-3-5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Graph of dependence of <span class="html-italic">K</span><sub>1</sub> on the average degree of damage to buildings <span class="html-italic">d</span>.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 9483 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Horizontal Shear Performance of Composite Girders Using Separable Shear Connectors
by Dae-Sung Jung, Se-Hyun Park, Jong-Wook Han and Chul-Young Kim
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 10982; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310982 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 274
Abstract
The increased volume of heavy vehicles and use of de-icing agents on concrete bridge decks accelerates the deterioration of these structures. Therefore, the rapid replacement of these structures has attracted considerable attention, with prefabricated bridges being the preferred option. Conventionally, horizontal shear connections [...] Read more.
The increased volume of heavy vehicles and use of de-icing agents on concrete bridge decks accelerates the deterioration of these structures. Therefore, the rapid replacement of these structures has attracted considerable attention, with prefabricated bridges being the preferred option. Conventionally, horizontal shear connections between girders and precast decks have incorporated rebar stirrup shear connectors. Although effective for initial construction, this method renders dismantling of aged decks complex, because rebar connectors are fully embedded within girders. This study introduced an embedded separable shear connector that minimizes deck-breaking and facilitates easy reinstallation by the simple separation of the deck from the girder. Horizontal shear and flexural tests on composite girders and comparisons with various design codes were conducted to evaluate this connector. The results of horizontal shear tests confirmed that securing sufficient embedment depth is necessary to prevent the pull-out failure of shear connectors. Additionally, prestressed concrete composite girder flexural tests with improved design verified that the detachable shear connectors exhibited an approximately 60% improvement in flexural performance compared with conventional reinforcement shear connectors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Case study on the removal and reconstruction of aged concrete slabs. (<b>a</b>) Cutting aged concrete slab; (<b>b</b>) Cutting rebar shear connectors; (<b>c</b>) Reinstallation of rebar shear connectors; (<b>d</b>) Complete reconstruction of new PC slab.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bending–horizontal shear force mechanism of a prestressed concrete (PSC) composite girder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Conceptual diagram of embedded demountable shear connector. (<b>a</b>) Components of DY–shear connector; (<b>b</b>) Girder–slab composition; (<b>c</b>) Separation of girder and slab.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Engineering drawing of the shear specimen: (<b>a</b>) Assembly drawing (top: top view, top-right: right side view, bottom-left: left side view, and bottom: front view); (<b>b</b>) Reinforcement diagram (top: top view, top-right: right side view, and bottom: front view).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Types of shear connector. (<b>a</b>) Rebar; (<b>b</b>) M-DY; (<b>c</b>) S-DY.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Test apparatus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sensor locations (top: steel; bottom: concrete). C indicates the strain gauge attached to the concrete surface, and S represents a strain gauge attached to steel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Load–slip displacement curves. (<b>a</b>) Rebar; (<b>b</b>) M-DY; (<b>c</b>) S-DY.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Fracture of test specimens ((<b>Left</b>): Rebar; (<b>Middle</b>): M-DY; (<b>Right</b>): S-DY).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Reconstruction simulation (S-DY-s3): (<b>a</b>) Slab composition; (<b>b</b>) Remove shear connector; (<b>c</b>) Fracture (girder); (<b>d</b>) Fracture (slab).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of horizontal shear strengths.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Bending test specimen drawing for PSC composite girder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Bending-test setup and linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) installations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Crack patterns ((<b>top</b>): Rebar_F, (<b>middle</b>): DY_F, (<b>bottom</b>): DY_H).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Force–vertical deflection curves. (<b>a</b>) Rebar_F; (<b>b</b>) DY_F; (<b>c</b>) DY_H.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Force–slip curves. (<b>a</b>) Rebar_F; (<b>b</b>) DY_F; (<b>c</b>) DY_H.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 5725 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Damage Factors of Reinforced Concrete Frame Under Internal Explosion
by Jiaxin Li, Jianping Yin, Xudong Li and Shi Rui
Buildings 2024, 14(12), 3761; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123761 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 286
Abstract
To explore the mechanisms of the damage to reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures subjected to internal explosions, this paper establishes a precise finite element model (FEM) of an RC frame utilizing ANSYS/LS-DYNA software 14.5. The influence of four important damage factors on the [...] Read more.
To explore the mechanisms of the damage to reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures subjected to internal explosions, this paper establishes a precise finite element model (FEM) of an RC frame utilizing ANSYS/LS-DYNA software 14.5. The influence of four important damage factors on the degree of structural damage is systematically analyzed. Specifically, the vertical displacement at the top center of the frame serves as the primary evaluation metric, while the four damage factors are treated as independent variables. An empty column is incorporated as an error term, facilitating a five-factor, four-level orthogonal optimization design for the simulation experiments. Based on this design, a variance analysis of the simulation outcomes is conducted. The results show that by increasing the reinforcement ratio of the beam section and reducing the charge weight, when the explosion point is located at the higher part of the building floor and near the external window, the vertical displacement of the building after the internal explosion can be reduced. The order of the influence degree of each damage factor on the damage to the reinforced concrete frame structure is as follows: explosion floor, charge weight, beam section reinforcement ratio, and explosion horizontal position. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of geometric structure of building: (<b>a</b>) geometric size of building structure; (<b>b</b>) plane layout; (<b>c</b>) reinforcement details of beam; (<b>d</b>) reinforcement details of column.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of Beam161 unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of SOLID164 unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The influence of different mesh sizes on the vertical displacement of the top of the RC frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>FEM of frame structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>PLASTIC_KINEMATIC model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Test model [<a href="#B31-buildings-14-03761" class="html-bibr">31</a>] and FEM. (<b>a</b>) is the test model; (<b>b</b>) is the FEM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Grid convergence verification of test model: (<b>a</b>) the influence of different mesh sizes on peak acceleration; (<b>b</b>) the influence of different mesh sizes on the calculation time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Dynamic response of a structure under the action of 50 g of emulsion explosives: (<b>a</b>) acceleration response curve of A2; (<b>b</b>) acceleration response curve of A3; (<b>c</b>) the frequency–power spectral density curve of A2; (<b>d</b>) the frequency–power spectral density curve of A3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Characteristic response of structural damage under 200 g emulsion explosives: (<b>a</b>) holistic model; (<b>b</b>) the top of the frame; (<b>c</b>) beam–column joint.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The influence of reinforcement ratio on RC frame damage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The influence of the charge weight on the damage to RC frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The influence of horizontal position of explosion on the damage to RC frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The effect of the floor where the explosion occurred on the damage to the RC frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Frame structure damage cloud map at different moments: (<b>a</b>) 8 ms; (<b>b</b>) 40 ms; (<b>c</b>) 650 ms; (<b>d</b>) 2000 ms.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 8229 KiB  
Article
Bending Performance of F-Type Socket Joints for Rectangular Pipe Jacking Tunnels with Longitudinal Connectors
by Youjun Xu, Chengjun Xu, Chao Zhang and Xu Zhang
Buildings 2024, 14(12), 3758; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123758 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 285
Abstract
Joints are the weakest part of rectangular pipe jacking tunnels, and the structural form of the joint is closely related to its bending resistance. In this work, the F-type socket joint of a rectangular pipe jacking tunnel is selected as the object of [...] Read more.
Joints are the weakest part of rectangular pipe jacking tunnels, and the structural form of the joint is closely related to its bending resistance. In this work, the F-type socket joint of a rectangular pipe jacking tunnel is selected as the object of study. The bending mechanical properties of the joints connected by steel screws and those connected by bent bolts are compared via a three-point bending test. The results show that the two longitudinal connection joints have similar bending stiffnesses. Compared with the bent bolt connection joint, the steel screw connection joint has better toughness, and the load at which the joint enters the plastic stage and the bearing capacity are increased by 0.47 times and 1.02 times, respectively. The failure modes of the joints connected by steel screw connections and those connected by bent bolts are crushing of the concrete of the top plate and cracking of the concrete above the screw holes, respectively. When a bent bolt connection is used, the reinforcement at the screw hole should be locally strengthened, or ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) should be used at the screw hole to improve the load-bearing capacity of the joint. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geometry and joint details of rectangular pipe jacking: (<b>a</b>) dimensions of the cross-sectional (unit: mm); (<b>b</b>) dimensions of the longitudinal section (unit: mm); (<b>c</b>) details of the joint construction (unit: mm). Notes: N1 stands for HRB 400 with a diameter of 12 mm; N2 stands for HRB 400 with a diameter of 14 mm; N3 and N4 stand for HRB 400 with a diameter of 8 mm; and N5 stands for HRB 400 with a diameter of 10 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Specimen preparation process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Layout of measurement points: (<b>a</b>) surface of concrete side (unit: mm); (<b>b</b>) surface of concrete top slab (unit: mm); (<b>c</b>) steel bar (unit: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The test loading device and the loading of the field test apparatus (unit: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Failure mode of the joints: (<b>a</b>) jack joint with steel screws; (<b>b</b>) jack joint with bent bolts; (<b>c</b>) socket joint with bent bolts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Strain–load curves for steel bars: (<b>a</b>) longitudinal reinforcement of steel screw connection joints; (<b>b</b>) ring reinforcement of steel screw connection joint; (<b>c</b>) longitudinal reinforcement of bent bolt connection joints; (<b>d</b>) ring reinforcement of bent bolt connection joints.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Concrete strain–load curves for sidewall: (<b>a</b>) joint with steel screws; (<b>b</b>) joint with bent bolts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Concrete strain–load curves for top plate: (<b>a</b>) joint with steel screws; (<b>b</b>) joint with bent bolts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Stress–load curves for longitudinal connectors: (<b>a</b>) steel screws; (<b>b</b>) bent bolts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Joint opening and rotation angle curve: (<b>a</b>) moment–rotation angle curve; (<b>b</b>) load–opening curve.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 9192 KiB  
Article
Seismic Behavior of Resilient Reinforced Concrete Columns with Ultra-High-Strength Rebars Under Strong Earthquake-Induced Multiple Reversed Cyclic Loading
by Yue Wen, Gaochuang Cai, Prafulla Bahadur Malla, Hayato Kikuchi and Cheng Xie
Buildings 2024, 14(12), 3747; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123747 - 25 Nov 2024
Viewed by 295
Abstract
The frequent occurrence of major earthquakes highlights the structural challenges posed by long-period ground motions (LPGMs). This study investigates the seismic performance and resilience of five reinforced concrete (RC) columns with different high-strength steel bars under LPGM-induced cyclic loading, both experimentally and numerically. [...] Read more.
The frequent occurrence of major earthquakes highlights the structural challenges posed by long-period ground motions (LPGMs). This study investigates the seismic performance and resilience of five reinforced concrete (RC) columns with different high-strength steel bars under LPGM-induced cyclic loading, both experimentally and numerically. The results show that low-bond and debonded high-strength steel bars significantly enhance self-centering capabilities and reduce residual drift, with lateral force reductions of 7.6% for normal cyclic loading and 19.2% for multiple reversed cyclic loading. The concrete damage in the hinge zone of the columns was increased; however, the significant inside damage of the concrete near the steel bars made it easier to restore the columns for the damage accumulation caused by multiple loading. Based on the experiment, a numerical model was developed for the columns, and a simplified model was proposed to predict energy dissipation capacity, providing practical design methods for resilient RC structures that may be attacked by LPGMs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Details of tested specimens: (<b>a</b>) F60S3U; (<b>b</b>) F60S3SB and F60S3SBD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Used reinforcements in the study: (<b>a</b>) SBPDN1275/1420 bar (U); (<b>b</b>) SBPDN1080/1230 bar (USD).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Test methods: (<b>a</b>) test setup; (<b>b</b>) LVDT position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Loading protocols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Damage development and failure of the tested columns (Blue: pull direction, Red: push direction).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) F60S3U-NC; (<b>b</b>) F60S3SB-NC; (<b>c</b>) F60S3SB-MRC; (<b>d</b>) F60S3SBD-NC; (<b>e</b>) F60S3SBD-MRC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Skeleton curves of the specimens: (<b>a</b>) F60S3U-NC; (<b>b</b>) comparison between F60S3SB-NC and F60S3SB-MRC; (<b>c</b>) comparison between F60S3SBD-NC and F60S3SBD-MRC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of the envelope curves of the specimens: (<b>a</b>) effect of loading method; (<b>b</b>) effect of unbonded length.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Residual drift ratios of the specimens: (<b>a</b>) specimens reinforced by different rebars; (<b>b</b>) specimens reinforced by USD and unbonded USD rebars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Calculation method of equivalent viscous damping coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Equivalent viscous damping coefficients of tested specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Column modeling and analysis method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Stress–strain model of concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Stress–strain model of steel rebar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Bond–slip models of steel bars: (<b>a</b>) Funato et al.’s model for U-steel bars [<a href="#B26-buildings-14-03747" class="html-bibr">26</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Shima et al.’s model for USD bars [<a href="#B33-buildings-14-03747" class="html-bibr">33</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Comparison of skeleton curve between experimental and simulated results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Effects of the compressive strength of concrete: (<b>a</b>) specimens reinforced with low-bond ultra-high-strength rebars (U series); (<b>b</b>) specimens reinforced with ultra-high-strength USD rebars (SB series); (<b>c</b>) specimens reinforced with unbonded ultra-high-strength USD rebars (SBD series).</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Effects of the shear span ratios (a/D): (<b>a</b>) specimens reinforced with low-bond ultra-high-strength rebars (U series); (<b>b</b>) specimens reinforced with ultra-high-strength USD rebars (SB series); (<b>c</b>) specimens reinforced with unbonded ultra-high-strength USD rebars (SBD series).</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Comparison between experimental and simulated curves: (<b>a</b>) SB columns, (<b>b</b>) SBD columns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Strength degradation ratio vs. the number of loading cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Relationship between frequency and degradation at drift ratio 2%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Comparison between experimental and adjusted curves: (<b>a</b>) SB columns, (<b>b</b>) SBD columns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Proposal of a simplified equivalent viscous damping coefficient model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Comparison between the test and analysis results: (<b>a</b>) MRC specimens, (<b>b</b>) NC specimens.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4391 KiB  
Article
Research on Bearing Capacity of a Novel Prestressed Concrete Prefabricated Foundation with High Uplift Resistance Characteristic
by Wei Zhang, Zhengzhong Ding, Hewen Kang, Pengzhong Lin, Guolu Wen, Deng Yong, Chouxiao Lu, Jiawei Wang, Xiangrui Meng, Kunjie Rong and Li Tian
Buildings 2024, 14(12), 3743; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123743 - 24 Nov 2024
Viewed by 375
Abstract
Unlike traditional building structures, transmission tower foundations endure significant vertical and horizontal loads, with particularly high uplift resistance requirements in complex terrains. Moreover, challenges such as difficult material transport and low construction efficiency arise in these regions. This study, based on practical projects, [...] Read more.
Unlike traditional building structures, transmission tower foundations endure significant vertical and horizontal loads, with particularly high uplift resistance requirements in complex terrains. Moreover, challenges such as difficult material transport and low construction efficiency arise in these regions. This study, based on practical projects, proposes a novel high uplift resistance prestressed concrete prefabricated foundation (HURPCPF) tailored for transmission line systems in complex terrains. A refined finite element model is developed using ABAQUS to analyze its performance under uplift, compressive, and horizontal loads. Comparative studies with cast-in-situ concrete foundations evaluate the HURPCPF’s bearing capacity, while parametric analysis explores the impacts of foundation depth and dimensions. The results show that the proposed HURPCPF exhibits a linear load–displacement relationship, with uniform deformation and good integrity under compressive and uplift conditions. During overturning, the tilt angle is less than 1/500, meeting safety standards. The design of prestressed steel strands and internal reinforcement effectively distributes tensile stress, with a maximum stress of 290 MPa, well below the yield stress of 400 MPa. Compared to cast-in-situ concrete foundations, the displacement at the top of the HURPCPF’s column differs by less than 7%, indicating comparable bearing performance. As foundation depth and size increase, vertical displacement of the HURPCPF decreases, enhancing its uplift resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of HURPCPF form.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Calculation model of transmission tower foundation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Finite element model of HURPCPF and soil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Key point arrangement for displacement response.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Load-displacement curves of each measurement point of the HURPCPF. (<b>a</b>) Compression load condition; (<b>b</b>) Uplift load condition; (<b>c</b>) Overturning load condition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Stress contour of the prestressed steel strands. (<b>a</b>) Unloaded; (<b>b</b>) Compression load condition; (<b>c</b>) Uplift load condition; (<b>d</b>) Overturning load condition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Stress contour of the reinforcement. (<b>a</b>) Compression load condition; (<b>b</b>) Uplift load condition; (<b>c</b>) Overturning load condition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Stress contour of the HURPCPF’s concrete components. (<b>a</b>) Compression load condition (tensile stress); (<b>b</b>) Uplift load condition (tensile stress); (<b>c</b>) Overturning load condition (tensile stress); (<b>d</b>) Compression load condition (compressive stress); (<b>e</b>) Uplift load condition (compressive stress); (<b>f</b>) Overturning load condition (compressive stress).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of load-displacement curves of HURPCPF and CCF. (<b>a</b>) Compression load condition; (<b>b</b>) Uplift load condition; (<b>c</b>) Overturning load condition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of base plate’s displacement data of HURPCPF and CCF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Displacement data for HURPCPFs at different foundation depths.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of response data of HURPCPF’s maximum stress reinforcements at different foundation depths.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Displacement data for HURPCPFs at different foundation sizes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of response data of HURPCPF’s maximum stress reinforcements at different foundation sizes.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3994 KiB  
Article
Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Hydraulic Structures with External Reinforcement System Made of Carbon Fiber-Based Composite Materials with Development of Calculation Recommendations
by Oleg Rubin, Dmitry Kozlov, Anton Antonov and Junhao Zhang
Buildings 2024, 14(12), 3739; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123739 - 24 Nov 2024
Viewed by 377
Abstract
During the long-term operation of hydraulic structures under the action of complex loads and impacts, non-design changes occur, which lead to a decrease in the bearing capacity and safety and, accordingly, to the need for structural reinforcements. Experiments were conducted to study the [...] Read more.
During the long-term operation of hydraulic structures under the action of complex loads and impacts, non-design changes occur, which lead to a decrease in the bearing capacity and safety and, accordingly, to the need for structural reinforcements. Experiments were conducted to study the strengthening of reinforced concrete models of hydraulic structures with interblock construction joints (located in two directions) and with the low longitudinal reinforcement coefficients typical of hydraulic structures (μs = 0.0039 and μs = 0.0083), using the low concrete classes B15 and B25. These structures were strengthened using external reinforcement with carbon ribbons of the FibArm 530/300 type. The results revealed an increase in the bearing capacity (by 1.355- and 1.66-fold); accordingly, the high efficiency of this strengthening method for reinforced concrete hydraulic structures was proven. Using the results of these experiments, including the obtained special characteristic of the cracking of reinforced concrete structures and the results of studies by other authors, recommendations for calculations involving reinforced concrete hydraulic engineering structures strengthened with an external reinforcement system of carbon-fibre-based composite materials were developed and proposed. Carbon-fibre-based composite materials are used as elements of external reinforcement for building structures (unidirectional—tapes, bidirectional—meshes and fabrics). The calculation recommendations proposed by the authors can be taken into account for the creation of a regulatory framework for hydropower facilities, including hydroelectric power plants and pumped-storage power plants. They justify the use of an external reinforcement system made with carbon-fibre-based composite materials to strengthen hydraulic structures in operation and provide an increased level of safety for reinforced concrete structures and constructions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Materials, and Repair & Renovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Reinforcement schemes for RC models with vertical and horizontal interblock construction joints: (<b>a</b>) B-I15-2.1; (<b>b</b>) B-I15-2.2; (<b>c</b>) B-I25-1.1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Schemes of beam-type model reinforcement with carbon tapes: 1—interblock construction joints; 2—150 mm wide carbon tape (2 layers); 3—150 mm wide carbon tape anchoring ties; 4—50 mm wide carbon tape ties; 5—carbon tape ties in the shear span.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The view of the beam-type model reinforced with carbon composite tapes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scheme of typical cracks in the experimental models during the first stage of tests without reinforcement: (<b>a</b>) B-15-2.1, (<b>b</b>) B-I15-2.2, and (<b>c</b>) B-I25-1.1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Fracture crack patterns of reinforced experimental beams during the second stage of the study: (<b>a</b>) B-15-2.1, (<b>b</b>) B-I15-2.2, and (<b>c</b>) B-I25-1.1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The width of the vertical normal cracks opening in the middle part of the span of the models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The opening width of the vertical interblock joint.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Force diagram for the calculation regarding the vertical section of a bending reinforced concrete structure externally reinforced with composite materials.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scheme of force action when calculating a concrete structure reinforced with external reinforcement made of composite materials on an inclined section for the action of shear forces: 1—vertical joint; 2—horizontal joint; 3—inclined crack.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 8452 KiB  
Article
Seismic Analysis of Non-Regular Structures Based on Fragility Curves: A Study on Reinforced Concrete Frames
by Giovanni Smiroldo, Marco Fasan and Chiara Bedon
Buildings 2024, 14(12), 3734; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123734 - 23 Nov 2024
Viewed by 490
Abstract
The seismic performance and expected structural damage in reinforced concrete (RC) frames, as in many others, is a critical aspect for design. In this study, a set of RC frames characterized by increasing in-plan and in-height non-regularity is specifically investigated. Four code-conforming three-dimensional [...] Read more.
The seismic performance and expected structural damage in reinforced concrete (RC) frames, as in many others, is a critical aspect for design. In this study, a set of RC frames characterized by increasing in-plan and in-height non-regularity is specifically investigated. Four code-conforming three-dimensional (3D) buildings with varying regularity levels are numerically analyzed. Their seismic assessment is conducted by using unscaled real ground motion records (61 in total) and employing non-linear dynamic simulations within the Cloud Analysis framework. Three distinct intensity measures (IMs) are used to evaluate the impact of structural non-regularity on their seismic performance. Furthermore, fragility curves are preliminary derived based on conventional linear regression models and lognormal distribution. In contrast with the initial expectations and the typical results of non-linear dynamic analyses, the presented comparative results of the fragility curves show that the non-regularity level increase for the examined RC frames does not lead to progressively increasing fragility. Upon these considerations on the initial numerical findings, a re-evaluation of the methodology is performed using a reduced subset of ground motion records, in order to account for potential biases in their selection. Moreover, to uncover deeper insights into the unexpected outcomes, a logistic regression based on a maximum likelihood estimate is also employed to develop fragility curves. Comparative results are thus critically discussed, showing that the herein considered fragility development methods may lead to seismic assessment outcomes for code-conforming non-regular buildings that are in contrast with those of raw structural analyses. In fact, the considered building code design provisions seem to compensate non-regularity-induced torsional effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Advanced Concrete Structures in Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Hazard spectra for Tolmezzo (Udine, Italy) site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>RF element cross-section: (<b>a</b>) 1–2–3 floors; (<b>b</b>) 4–5 columns; (<b>c</b>) perimetral and (<b>d</b>) internal beam.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Reference structures: (<b>a</b>) RF; (<b>b</b>) NRF1; and (<b>c</b>) NRF2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Verification intervals and cumulative distribution functions for the examined RC frames: (<b>a</b>) RF; (<b>b</b>) NRF1; (<b>c</b>) NRF2-Q2; and (<b>d</b>) NRF2-Q4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of cumulative distribution functions for the examined RC frames.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>infrmFB element: (<b>a</b>) fiber discretization; and (<b>b</b>) element orientation, with output notation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Chord-Rotation Demand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Magnitude–distance scatter plot for the selection of 61 ground motion records.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Elastic spectra of the selected records.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Linear regressions of the S<sub>a,avg</sub>—DCR correlation for: (<b>a</b>) RF; (<b>b</b>) NRF1; (<b>c</b>) NRF2-Q2; and (<b>d</b>) NRF2-Q4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Fragility curves of the S<sub>a,avg</sub>—DCR correlation for: (<b>a</b>) RF; (<b>b</b>) NRF1; (<b>c</b>) NRF2-Q2; and (<b>d</b>) NRF2-Q4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Fragility curves of the S<sub>a,avg</sub>—DCR correlation for: (<b>a</b>) RF; (<b>b</b>) NRF1; (<b>c</b>) NRF2-Q2; and (<b>d</b>) NRF2-Q4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparisons of (<b>a</b>) median linear regressions and (<b>b</b>) fragility curves for the complete sample of accelerograms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of (<b>a</b>) linear regressions and (<b>b</b>) fragility curves for the reduced sample of accelerograms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Logistic regression for the complete sample of accelerograms for (<b>a</b>) RF; (<b>b</b>) NRF1; (<b>c</b>) NRF2-Q2; and (<b>d</b>) NRF2-Q4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of logistic regressions for the complete sample of accelerograms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Logistic regressions for the reduced sample of accelerograms for (<b>a</b>) RF; (<b>b</b>) NRF1; (<b>c</b>) NRF2-Q2; and (<b>d</b>) NRF2-Q4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Comparison of the logistic regressions for the reduced sample of accelerograms.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 15945 KiB  
Article
Shear Strengthening with a Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix of Reinforced Concrete Elements Under Different Levels of Loads: An Experimental Investigation
by Pavlo Vegera, Viktor Borzovic, Zinovii Blikharskyi, Iryna Grynyova and Jaroslav Baran
Constr. Mater. 2024, 4(4), 721-737; https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater4040039 - 22 Nov 2024
Viewed by 319
Abstract
This article explores the impact of strengthening reinforced concrete beams under different load levels, focusing on the use of polyphenylene benzobisoxazole (P.B.O.) fibers in a stabilized inorganic matrix to enhance the shear capacity. This research examines the interaction between modern composite materials and [...] Read more.
This article explores the impact of strengthening reinforced concrete beams under different load levels, focusing on the use of polyphenylene benzobisoxazole (P.B.O.) fibers in a stabilized inorganic matrix to enhance the shear capacity. This research examines the interaction between modern composite materials and existing reinforced concrete structures, highlighting the practical challenges when the full unloading of structures is impossible. The experiments demonstrate that strengthening significantly increases the shear strength, with a maximum enhancement of 25%. However, the effect decreases as the load applied during strengthening increases, dropping to 16% at 70% of the ultimate load. This research also highlights the importance of refining current calculation methods due to the complex stress–strain state of beams and the unpredictable nature of shear failures. It concludes that composite materials, especially fiber-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) systems, provide a practical solution for enhancing structural performance while maintaining the integrity and safety of concrete elements. This article emphasizes that the strengthening efficiency should be adjusted based on the applied load, suggesting a 5% reduction in effectiveness for every 10% increase in the initial load level. The findings support the empirical hypothesis that the shear strength improvement diminishes linearly with higher load levels during strengthening. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Reinforcement of the testing specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Testing of the reinforcement samples: (<b>a</b>) stress–strain diagram for reinforcement ∅22; (<b>b</b>) stress–strain diagram for reinforcement ∅14; (<b>c</b>) stress–strain diagram for reinforcement ∅8; and (<b>d</b>) general view of the tested reinforcement samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Components of the strengthening system: (<b>a</b>) P.B.O. fabric Ruredil X Mesh Gold; and (<b>b</b>) mineral cementitious solution Ruredil X Mesh M750.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Testing of the Ruredil X Mesh M750 mortar cubes: (<b>a</b>) compression test process; and (<b>b</b>) tested samples from one series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Strengthening system layout on an experimental specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A graph of the deformations of the compressed zone of concrete, stretched and compressed reinforcement in beam BSC 2.3-0.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The deflection of the BSC 2.3-0.5 beam: (<b>a</b>) of the BSC 2.3.1-0.5; and (<b>b</b>) of BSC2.3.2-0.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Tested specimen BO 2.1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The strains of the transverse reinforcement of beam BO 2.1:(<b>a</b>) graph of the strains in the transverse reinforcement (<b>b</b>) placement of the measuring cross-sections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Tested specimen BSC 2.1-0.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Tested specimen BSC 2.2-0.3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Tested specimen BSC 2.3-0.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Tested specimen BSC 2.4-0.7.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The strains of the transverse reinforcement of the beam: (<b>a</b>) BSC 2.1-0; (<b>b</b>) BSC 2.2-0.3; (<b>c</b>) BSC 2.3-0.5; and (<b>d</b>) BSC 2.4-0.7.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The strains of the beam reinforcement element: (<b>a</b>) BSC 2.1-0; (<b>b</b>) BSC 2.2-0.3; (<b>c</b>) BSC 2.3-0.5; and (<b>d</b>) BSC 2.4-0.7.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15 Cont.
<p>The strains of the beam reinforcement element: (<b>a</b>) BSC 2.1-0; (<b>b</b>) BSC 2.2-0.3; (<b>c</b>) BSC 2.3-0.5; and (<b>d</b>) BSC 2.4-0.7.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>A graph of the reduction of the strengthening effect depending from the level of the active load.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop