Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (493)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = reinforce concrete bridges

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 10425 KiB  
Article
Hybrid Reinforced Concrete Frames with Engineering Cementitious Composites: Experimental and Numerical Investigations
by Abdulrahman Metawa, Moussa Leblouba and Samer Barakat
Sustainability 2024, 16(22), 10085; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210085 - 19 Nov 2024
Viewed by 241
Abstract
Reinforced concrete (RC) structures are vulnerable to damage under dynamic loads such as earthquakes, necessitating innovative solutions that enhance both performance and sustainability. This study investigates the integration of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) in RC frames to improve ductility, durability, and energy dissipation [...] Read more.
Reinforced concrete (RC) structures are vulnerable to damage under dynamic loads such as earthquakes, necessitating innovative solutions that enhance both performance and sustainability. This study investigates the integration of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) in RC frames to improve ductility, durability, and energy dissipation while considering cost-effectiveness. To achieve this, the partial replacement of concrete with ECC at key structural locations, such as beam–column joints, was explored through experimental testing and numerical simulations. Small-scale beams with varying ECC replacements were tested for failure modes, load–deflection responses, and crack propagation patterns. Additionally, nonlinear quasi-static cyclic and modal analyses were performed on full RC frames, ECC-reinforced frames, and hybrid frames with ECC at the joints. The results demonstrate that ECC reduces the need for shear reinforcement due to its crack-bridging ability, enhances ductility by up to 25% in cyclic loading scenarios, and lowers the formation of plastic hinges, thereby contributing to improved structural resilience. These findings suggest that ECC is a viable, sustainable solution for achieving resilient infrastructure in seismic regions, with an optimal balance between performance and cost. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Advances in Sustainable Materials and Structural Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Test specimens: (<b>a</b>) RC-St; (<b>b</b>) RC-ECC; (<b>c</b>) RC-ECC-St; (<b>d</b>) ECC (units: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>Test specimens: (<b>a</b>) RC-St; (<b>b</b>) RC-ECC; (<b>c</b>) RC-ECC-St; (<b>d</b>) ECC (units: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Test setup and instrumentation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Beam specimens after testing: (<b>a</b>) RC-St; (<b>b</b>) RC-ECC; (<b>c</b>) RC-ECC-St; (<b>d</b>) ECC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Load–deflection and crack openings: (<b>a</b>) RC; (<b>b</b>) RC-ECC; (<b>c</b>) RC-ECC-St; (<b>d</b>) ECC; (<b>e</b>) idealized load–deflection curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Load–deflection and crack openings: (<b>a</b>) RC; (<b>b</b>) RC-ECC; (<b>c</b>) RC-ECC-St; (<b>d</b>) ECC; (<b>e</b>) idealized load–deflection curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Stress–strain relationship of confined and unconfined concrete (compression side only).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Stress–strain relationship of steel reinforcement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Stress–strain relationship of ECC in compression and tension.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>RC, EC-ECC, and ECC case study frames.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>FEMA 461 loading protocol (partial signal).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Force–displacement curves of the three frames.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Damage locations in the RC frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Damage locations in the RC–ECC frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Damage locations in the full ECC frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Cumulative energy dissipation and residual deflection ratio.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3558 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Slab Bridges Using a Novel Health Index and LSTM-Based Deterioration Models
by Chi-Ho Jeon, Tae Ho Kwon, Jaehwan Kim, Kyu-San Jung and Ki-Tae Park
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10530; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210530 - 15 Nov 2024
Viewed by 304
Abstract
The Health Index (HI) serves as an essential tool for assessing the structural and functional condition of bridges, calculated based on the condition of structural components and the serviceability of the bridge. Its primary purpose is to identify the most deteriorated structures in [...] Read more.
The Health Index (HI) serves as an essential tool for assessing the structural and functional condition of bridges, calculated based on the condition of structural components and the serviceability of the bridge. Its primary purpose is to identify the most deteriorated structures in an asset inventory and prioritize those in most urgent need of repair. However, a frequently cited issue is the lack of accurate and objective data, with the determination of the HI often being heavily reliant on expert opinions and engineering judgment. Furthermore, the HI systems used in most countries are dependent on the current state of bridge components, making it challenging to use as a proactive indicator for factors such as the rate of bridge aging. To address this issue, this study introduces a novel HI as a quantitative evaluation metric for reinforced concrete slab bridges and details the process of deriving the HI based on deterioration models. The deterioration models are derived by preprocessing the deterioration data of reinforced concrete (RC) slab bridges, wherein the relationship between time and deterioration is directly employed for training a long short-term memory model. The HI was validated through a case study involving six RC slab bridges, wherein accuracies of >93% were achieved, confirming that the proposed quantitative evaluation methodology can significantly contribute to maintenance decisions for bridges. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Example of a slab defect map and defect quantity table from the inspection report used for data collection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Average deterioration areas for slabs, piers, and abutments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Deterioration model generation process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Learning and validation processes for the proposed model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Example of deterioration models for slab components in Region A.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>HI-based bridge evaluation process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>HI plots for the case study bridges.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 6246 KiB  
Article
Vehicle Collision Analysis of the Reinforced Concrete Barriers Installed on Bridges Using Node-Independent Model
by Jeong J. Kim and Jae S. Ahn
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10518; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210518 - 15 Nov 2024
Viewed by 395
Abstract
This paper focuses on improving vehicle collision simulations using finite element analysis (FEA) to examine interactions between reinforced concrete barriers and bridge decks. Three scenarios are explored: treating the barrier as a rigid body, analyzing reinforcement with a fixed base, and including the [...] Read more.
This paper focuses on improving vehicle collision simulations using finite element analysis (FEA) to examine interactions between reinforced concrete barriers and bridge decks. Three scenarios are explored: treating the barrier as a rigid body, analyzing reinforcement with a fixed base, and including the bridge deck’s cantilever portion beneath the barrier. Except for the rigid body model, a node-independent approach models the complex interactions between reinforcement and concrete in barriers on the bridge deck. This study evaluates barrier strength, occupant risk, and post-collision vehicle safety. Strength is assessed by examining stress in reinforcement and concrete, while occupant risk is measured using Theoretical Head Impact Velocity (THIV) and Post-impact Head Deceleration (PHD). Vehicle trajectory during collisions is also analyzed for stability. The results show significant differences in stress distribution and failure patterns when the bridge deck is considered compared to scenarios without it. Occupant risk evaluations suggest more flexible responses when the bridge deck is included. However, vehicle trajectory post-collision showed no significant differences across scenarios. These findings indicate that modeling efficiency varies based on evaluation criteria, suggesting a more realistic and effective approach for assessing barriers on bridges. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Node-sharing method to connect solid elements and beam elements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Concept of node-independent model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The geometry and rebar arrangement of the reinforced concrete barrier (unit: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mesh design for concrete barriers consisting of concrete and reinforcement bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of node-sharing method and node-independent model for reinforced concrete barriers: (<b>a</b>) node-sharing method and (<b>b</b>) node-independent model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Three test models for the reinforced concrete barriers: (<b>a</b>) Case 1; (<b>b</b>) Case 2; (<b>c</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Finite element models for vehicles: (<b>a</b>) truck model; (<b>b</b>) passenger car model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flowchart illustrating research methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Von-Mises stresses of steel reinforcement: (<b>a</b>) Case 2; (<b>b</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Principal stresses of concrete: (<b>a</b>) Case 2; (<b>b</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Principal stresses of concrete: (<b>a</b>) Case 2; (<b>b</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Variation in THIV with respect to time for different cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Variation in PHD with respect to time for different cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Post-impact trajectory of trucks: (<b>a</b>) Case 1; (<b>b</b>) Case 2; (<b>c</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Post-impact trajectory of passenger cars: (<b>a</b>) Case 1; (<b>b</b>) Case 2; (<b>c</b>) Case 3.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 13055 KiB  
Article
Structural Behavior of Full-Depth Deck Panels Having Developed Closure Strips Reinforced with GFRP Bars and Filled with UHPFRC
by Mahmoud Sayed Ahmed, Khaled Sennah and Hamdy M. Afefy
J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8(11), 468; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8110468 - 12 Nov 2024
Viewed by 446
Abstract
The adoption of prefabricated elements and systems (PBES) in accelerating bridge construction (ABC) and rapidly replacing aging infrastructure has attracted considerable attention from bridge authorities. These prefabricated components facilitate quick assembly, which diminishes the environmental footprint at the construction site, alleviates delays and [...] Read more.
The adoption of prefabricated elements and systems (PBES) in accelerating bridge construction (ABC) and rapidly replacing aging infrastructure has attracted considerable attention from bridge authorities. These prefabricated components facilitate quick assembly, which diminishes the environmental footprint at the construction site, alleviates delays and lane closures, reduces disruption for the traveling public, and ultimately conserves both time and taxpayer resources. The current paper explores the structural behavior of a reinforced concrete (RC) precast full-depth deck panel (FDDP) having 175 mm projected glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars embedded into a 200 mm wide closure strip filled with ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). Three joint details for moment-resisting connections (MRCs), named the angle joint, C-joint, and zigzag joint, were constructed and loaded to collapse. The controlled slabs and mid-span-connected precast FDDPs were statically loaded to collapse under concentric or eccentric wheel loading. The moment capacity of the controlled slab reinforced with GFRP bars compared with the concrete slab reinforced with steel reinforcing bars was less than 15% for the same reinforcement ratio. The precast FDDPs showed very similar results to those of the controlled slab reinforced with GFRP bars. The RC slab reinforced by steel reinforcing bars failed in the flexural mode, while the slab reinforced by GFRP bars failed in flexural-shear one. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Cement and Concrete Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Views of a slab-on-girder bridge with full-depth precast deck panels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagrams of the three proposed joints between precast deck panels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Reinforcement details and locations of the strain gauges and potentiometers (POTs).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Views of the reinforcement layout and formwork for the slab specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Plan views of closure strips in the jointed slabs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Test setup and crack pattern at failure for the cast-in-place specimen S1 (C.ST.C) reinforced with steel bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Test setup and crack pattern at failure of the cast-in-place specimen S2 (C.GFRP.C) reinforced with GFRP bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Test setup and crack pattern at failure of the jointed slab S3 (J.C.C) and concentric loading over the joint.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Test setup and crack pattern at failure of the jointed slab S4 (J.C.E) with eccentric loading at the joint.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Test setup and crack pattern of slab S5 (J.Z.E) failure with a zigzag-shaped joint under eccentric loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Test setup and crack pattern of slab S6 (J.A.C) failure with an angle-shaped joint under concentric loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Test setup and crack pattern at the failure of slab S7 (J.A.E) with an angle-shaped joint under eccentric loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Load-deflection relationships obtained at the mid-span of the slab specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>Load-deflection relationships obtained at the mid-span of the slab specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Structural behavior of the tested slabs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Whitney rectangular stress distribution for flexural design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>UHPFRC internal stress behavior. (<b>a</b>) Cross-section, (<b>b</b>) triangular stress distribution, (<b>c</b>) modified stress distribution, (<b>d</b>) internal forces, (<b>e</b>) strain distribution</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Control CIP steel slab S1 (C.ST.C) under concentric loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Control CIP GFRP slab S2 (C.GFRP.C) under concentric loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Jointed GFRP-reinforced FDDP S3 (J.C.C) under concentric loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Jointed GFRP-reinforced FDDP S4 (J.C.E) under eccentric loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Jointed GFRP-reinforced FDDP S5 (J.Z.E) under eccentric loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Jointed GFRP-reinforced FDDP S6 (J.A.C) under concentric loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Jointed GFRP-reinforced FDDP S7 (J.A.E) under eccentric loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Specified maximum spacing between girders for jointed slabs.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 6629 KiB  
Article
Experimental Investigations of Seismic Performance of Girder–Integral Abutment–Reinforced-Concrete Pile–Soil Systems
by Weiqiang Guo, Bruno Briseghella, Junqing Xue, Camillo Nuti and Fuyun Huang
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10166; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210166 - 6 Nov 2024
Viewed by 365
Abstract
Integral abutment bridges (IABs) have been widely applied in bridge engineering because of their excellent seismic performance, long service life, and low maintenance cost. The superstructure and substructure of an IAB are integrally connected to reduce the possibility of collapse or girders falling [...] Read more.
Integral abutment bridges (IABs) have been widely applied in bridge engineering because of their excellent seismic performance, long service life, and low maintenance cost. The superstructure and substructure of an IAB are integrally connected to reduce the possibility of collapse or girders falling during an earthquake. The soil behind the abutment can provide a damping effect to reduce the deformation of the structure under a seismic load. Girders have not been considered in some of the existing published experimental tests on integral abutment–reinforced-concrete (RC) pile (IAP)–soil systems, which may not accurately represent real conditions. A pseudo-static low-cycle test on a girder–integral abutment–RC pile (GIAP)–soil system was conducted for an IAB in China. The experiment’s results for the GIAP specimen were compared with those of the IAP specimen, including the failure mode, hysteretic curve, energy dissipation capacity, skeleton curve, stiffness degradation, and displacement ductility. The test results indicate that the failure modes of both specimens were different. For the IAP specimen, the pile cracked at a displacement of +2 mm, while the abutment did not crack during the test. For the GIAP specimen, the pile cracked at a displacement of −8 mm, and the abutment cracked at a displacement of 50 mm. The failure mode of the specimen changed from severe damage to the pile top under a small displacement to damage to both the abutment and pile top under a large displacement. Compared with the IAP specimen, the initial stiffness under positive horizontal displacement (39.2%), residual force accumulation (22.6%), residual deformation (12.6%), range of the elastoplastic stage in the skeleton curve, and stiffness degradation of the GIAP specimen were smaller; however, the initial stiffness under negative horizontal displacement (112.6%), displacement ductility coefficient (67.2%), average equivalent viscous damping ratio (30.8%), yield load (20.4%), ultimate load (7.8%), and range of the elastic stage in the skeleton curve of the GIAP specimen were larger. In summary, the seismic performance of the GIAP–soil system was better than that of the IAP–soil system. Therefore, to accurately reflect the seismic performance of GIAP–soil systems in IABs, it is suggested to consider the influence of the girder. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Analysis and Seismic Resilience in Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experiment diagram: (<b>a</b>) IAP [<a href="#B36-applsci-14-10166" class="html-bibr">36</a>]; (<b>b</b>) GIAP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Engineering background: (<b>a</b>) overall view of the IAB; (<b>b</b>) details on the girder, integral abutment, and pile (unit: cm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Information on the GIAP specimen (unit: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>GIAP specimen fabrication: (<b>a</b>) rebar cages for the girder–integral abutment–pile cap connection; (<b>b</b>) rebar cages for the pile; (<b>c</b>) pre-embedded high-strength threaded rods in the girder; (<b>d</b>) pile specimen; (<b>e</b>) welded connection of rebars between the pile and pile cap; (<b>f</b>) girder–integral abutment–pile specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Rigid steel container and test setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Vertical displacement restraint device at the girder end.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Horizontal displacement history.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Concrete strain gauges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Concrete strain of the pile: (<b>a</b>) IAP under a negative <span class="html-italic">d</span>; (<b>b</b>) GIAP under a negative <span class="html-italic">d</span>; (<b>c</b>) IAP under a positive <span class="html-italic">d</span>; (<b>d</b>) GIAP under a positive <span class="html-italic">d</span>. The points with a tensile strain larger than 200 με were emphasized by red dash circle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Concrete strain of the pile: (<b>a</b>) IAP under a negative <span class="html-italic">d</span>; (<b>b</b>) GIAP under a negative <span class="html-italic">d</span>; (<b>c</b>) IAP under a positive <span class="html-italic">d</span>; (<b>d</b>) GIAP under a positive <span class="html-italic">d</span>. The points with a tensile strain larger than 200 με were emphasized by red dash circle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Concrete strain of the abutment in the GIAP specimen: (<b>a</b>) negative <span class="html-italic">d</span>; (<b>b</b>) positive <span class="html-italic">d</span>. The points with a tensile strain larger than 200 με were emphasized by red dash circle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Damage to the abutment: (<b>a</b>) IAP [<a href="#B36-applsci-14-10166" class="html-bibr">36</a>]; (<b>b</b>) GIAP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Hysteresis curves: (<b>a</b>) IAP (<span class="html-italic">d</span> = −40~ + 40 mm) [<a href="#B36-applsci-14-10166" class="html-bibr">36</a>]; (<b>b</b>) GIAP (<span class="html-italic">d</span> = −130~ + 130 mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p><span class="html-italic">ξ<sub>i</sub></span> of specimen: (<b>a</b>) calculation diagram of <span class="html-italic">ξ<sub>i</sub></span>; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">ξ<sub>i</sub></span>-<span class="html-italic">d</span> curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Skeleton curve and parameters: (<b>a</b>) skeleton curve; (<b>b</b>) parameters of the skeleton curve determined using the Park method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Improved secant stiffness degradation curve.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 8845 KiB  
Article
Deformation Performance of Longitudinal Non-Uniformly Corroded Reinforced Concrete Columns
by Guoyao Sun and Huanjun Jiang
Materials 2024, 17(21), 5303; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17215303 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 351
Abstract
Due to the complexity of the marine corrosive environment, the rebar corrosion in reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers is usually longitudinal non-uniform. However, the study on the mechanical behavior of longitudinal non-uniformly corroded RC structural members is very limited. To systematically study the [...] Read more.
Due to the complexity of the marine corrosive environment, the rebar corrosion in reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers is usually longitudinal non-uniform. However, the study on the mechanical behavior of longitudinal non-uniformly corroded RC structural members is very limited. To systematically study the deformation performance of the longitudinal non-uniformly corroded RC columns, the finite element models of 106 RC columns with different parameters were established using the commercial software ABAQUS 2016. The effects of the height of the bottom section (represented in the text by the variable “position”), the length, and the rebar corrosion ratio of the corroded segment on the deformation performance of the longitudinal non-uniformly corroded RC columns were analyzed. It is found that the change in the position of the corroded segment on the column may change the most unfavorable section of the column and the failure mode. The length of the corroded segment significantly affects the yield deformation. The ultimate plastic deformation increases with the increase of position or length of the corroded segment. With the increase of rebar corrosion ratio of the corroded segment, the ultimate plastic deformation decreases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Comparison of load-displacement relationship curves between the test data and the numerical simulation results: (<b>a</b>) S1; (<b>b</b>) S2; (<b>c</b>) S3; (<b>d</b>) S4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The geometric dimensions and rebar details of the columns (unit: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The position of the corroded segment (unit: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The length of the corroded segment (unit: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>FE model of the columns. (<b>a</b>) Concrete; (<b>b</b>) rebar; (<b>c</b>) connector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of load-displacement relationship curves of columns with different positions of the corroded segment and the uncorroded column.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The influence of the position of the non-uniformly corroded segment on yield deformation of columns with different <span class="html-italic">η</span> values. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 100 mm; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 400 mm; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 800 mm; (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 1200 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The influence of the position of the non-uniformly corroded segment on ultimate plastic deformation of columns with different <span class="html-italic">η</span> values. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 100 mm; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 400 mm; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 800 mm; (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 1200 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Cloud map of the rebar-yielding of the columns with different positions of the corroded segment at peak load. (<b>a</b>) C-2-400-30; (<b>b</b>) C-3-400-30; (<b>c</b>) C-4-400-30; (<b>d</b>) C-5-400-30.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of the load-displacement relationship curves of columns with different lengths of the corroded segment and the uncorroded column.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The influence of the length of non-uniformly corroded segment on yield deformation of columns with different <span class="html-italic">η</span> values. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 1; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 2; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The distribution of the sectional bending moment and sectional curvature along the longitudinal direction of the non-uniformly corroded columns at the rebar-yielding state. (<b>a</b>) Sectional bending moment; (<b>b</b>) sectional curvature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The influence of the length of the non-uniformly corroded segment on the ultimate plastic deformation of the columns with different <span class="html-italic">η</span> values. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 1; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 2; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The cloud map of the rebar stress of C-3-100-20 and the cloud map of the rebar stress and the rebar-yielding of the local amplification zone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The cloud map of the rebar stress of C-3-400-20 and the cloud map of the rebar stress and the rebar-yielding of the local amplification zone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison of load-displacement relationship curves of columns with different corrosion ratios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The influence of the rebar corrosion ratio of the non-uniformly corroded segments on the yield deformation of the columns with different <span class="html-italic">L</span> values. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 1; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 2; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>The influence of the rebar corrosion ratio of the non-uniformly corroded segments on the ultimate plastic deformation of columns with different <span class="html-italic">L</span> values. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 1; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 2; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 3.</p>
Full article ">
38 pages, 4263 KiB  
Review
A Comprehensive Review of the Key Deterioration Factors of Concrete Bridge Decks
by Abdelazim Ibrahim, Sherif Abdelkhalek, Tarek Zayed, Abdul Hannan Qureshi and Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader
Buildings 2024, 14(11), 3425; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113425 - 28 Oct 2024
Viewed by 619
Abstract
Bridges are generally acknowledged as one of the vital structures of transportation systems. Meanwhile, they are prone to time-variant damage and deterioration mechanisms over their life span. With that in mind, this research study aims to explore state-of-the-art work in relation to deterioration [...] Read more.
Bridges are generally acknowledged as one of the vital structures of transportation systems. Meanwhile, they are prone to time-variant damage and deterioration mechanisms over their life span. With that in mind, this research study aims to explore state-of-the-art work in relation to deterioration models and related critical factors of reinforced concrete bridges. Particularly, this study presents a mixed review methodology (scientometric and systematic) that reviews over 300 publications in Scopus and Web of Science databases over the period 1985–2023. The study scrutinized and categorized the wide spectrum of deterioration factors in reinforced concrete bridges with the help of deterioration models. Results manifested that implicating deterioration factors can be grouped into seven main clusters, namely chemical, material properties, design & construction, physical, operational, environmental, and force majeure. In addition, it is noted that hitherto, there has been a lack of sufficient research efforts on non-destructive evaluation-based deterioration models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Advanced Concrete Structures in Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Bridge deck composition and deterioration mechanism: (<b>a</b>) Rainwater penetration due to initial cracks and damage to the waterproof layer; (<b>b</b>) Chloride penetration into the deck top surface due to the stagnant water with salt; (<b>c</b>) Water leakage to the deck bottom surface due to crack propagation; (<b>d</b>) Corrosion of steel reinforcement at the bottom and damage to the deck bottom surface. (Reproduced from Ref. [<a href="#B6-buildings-14-03425" class="html-bibr">6</a>] Copyright (2020) MDPI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Bridge deterioration cases: (<b>a</b>) Seepage; (<b>b</b>) Efflorescence; (<b>c</b>) Delamination; (<b>d</b>) Cracks. (Reproduced from Ref. [<a href="#B7-buildings-14-03425" class="html-bibr">7</a>] Copyright (2016) Elsevier).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Research framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scientometric Analysis (Screening and Evaluation).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Co-authorship network of countries in the domain of DET_FMB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Keyword co-occurrence network of author keywords in DET_FMB research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Annual production of DET_FMB-related research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Types of bridge deterioration models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Bar chart for the material category.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Bar chart for chemical properties.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Sensitivity analysis for variables affecting predicted bridge superstructure condition (Reproduced from Ref. [<a href="#B86-buildings-14-03425" class="html-bibr">86</a>] Copyright (2019) Taylor &amp; Francis).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Bar chart for the design and construction category.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Bar chart for the physical properties.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Bar chart for the operational category.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Bar chart for the environmental category.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Deterioration at the bridge joints caused by rain and vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Bar chart for the force majeure category.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Gaps in the Literature on Concrete Bridge Deck Deterioration Models and Factors.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 11316 KiB  
Article
Experimental Study on the Flexural Performance of the Corrosion-Affected Simply Supported Prestressed Concrete Box Girder in a High-Speed Railway
by Hai Li, Yuanguang Qiu, Zhicheng Pan, Yiming Yang, Huang Tang and Fanjun Ma
Buildings 2024, 14(10), 3322; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103322 - 21 Oct 2024
Viewed by 482
Abstract
Prestressed concrete box girders are commonly employed in the development of high-speed railway bridge constructions. The prestressed strands in the girder may corrode due to long-term chloride erosion, leading to the degradation of its flexural performance. To examine the flexural performance of corrosion-affected [...] Read more.
Prestressed concrete box girders are commonly employed in the development of high-speed railway bridge constructions. The prestressed strands in the girder may corrode due to long-term chloride erosion, leading to the degradation of its flexural performance. To examine the flexural performance of corrosion-affected simply supported prestressed concrete box girders, eight T-shaped mock-up beams related to the girders used in the construction of high-speed railway bridges were manufactured utilizing similarity theory. Seven of the beams underwent electrochemical accelerated corrosion, and then each beam was subjected to failure under the four-point load test method. Measurements recorded and analyzed in detail during the loading process included the following: crack propagation, crack width at various loads, crack load, ultimate load, deflection, and concrete strain of the mid-span section. The results demonstrate that a corrosion rate of just 8.31% has a considerable impact on the structural integrity of the beams, as evidenced by a pronounced reduction in flexural cracks and a tendency towards reduced reinforcement failure. Furthermore, the corrosive process has a detrimental effect on mid-span deflection, ductility, and ultimate flexural bearing capacity, which could have significant implications for bridge safety. This study provides valuable insights for the assessment of flexural performance and the development of appropriate maintenance strategies for corroded simply supported box girders in high-speed railways. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Cross-section of model T-shaped beam (mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of model T-shaped beam (mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Reinforcement diagram of model T-shaped beam (mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Accelerated corrosion process of specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A diagram illustrating the loading arrangement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Test site with loading and measurement devices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Failure patterns of the test beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Failure patterns of the test beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Final crack distribution of test beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Final crack distribution of test beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Moment–deflection response of mid-span deflection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Moment–deflection response of mid-span deflection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Moment–concrete strain curve at mid-span section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Moment–concrete strain curve at mid-span section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Flexural bearing capacity versus the corrosion rate of the steel strand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Relationship between the decrease rate of the flexural bearing capacity and the corrosion rate of the steel strand.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 7160 KiB  
Article
Experimental Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior of Shear Connectors for Precast Sandwich Wall Panels When Subjected to the Push-Out Tests
by John Kennedy Fonsêca Silva and Rodrigo de Melo Lameiras
Buildings 2024, 14(10), 3246; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103246 - 14 Oct 2024
Viewed by 568
Abstract
Precast concrete sandwich panels consist of two outer layers connected by a central connector and an inner insulating layer that enhances thermal and acoustic performance. A key challenge with these panels is eliminating thermal bridges caused by metallic connectors, which reduce energy efficiency. [...] Read more.
Precast concrete sandwich panels consist of two outer layers connected by a central connector and an inner insulating layer that enhances thermal and acoustic performance. A key challenge with these panels is eliminating thermal bridges caused by metallic connectors, which reduce energy efficiency. PERFOFRP connectors, made from perforated glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) sheets, have been proposed to address this issue. These connectors feature holes that allow concrete to pass through, creating anchoring pins that enhance shear resistance and prevent the separation of the concrete layers. This research aimed to evaluate the effect of the diameter and number of holes on the mechanical strength of PERFOFRP connectors. Three diameters not previously reported in the literature were selected: 12.70 mm, 15.88 mm, and 19.05 mm. A total of 18 specimens, encompassing 6 different configurations with varying numbers of holes, underwent push-out tests. The most significant resistance increase was a 15% gain over non-perforated connectors, observed in the configuration featuring three holes of 19.05 mm. The connections exhibited rigid and nearly linear behavior until failure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Shear strength mechanisms: (<b>a</b>) concrete front; (<b>b</b>) concrete dowel; (<b>c</b>) friction between the FRP and the concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Modes of failure of the PERFOFRP connector: (<b>a</b>) at the concrete front; (<b>b</b>) in the exposed FRP; (<b>c</b>) in the embedded FRP; (<b>d</b>) in the concrete dowels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Assembly of the specimens: (<b>a</b>) formworks; (<b>b</b>) concreted specimens; (<b>c</b>) specimen after removal of the insulating material; (<b>d</b>) specimen after fixing the steel plate to the connector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Geometry of the specimens, with the measurements presented in millimeters [mm]: (<b>a</b>) top view (sectional drawing), with the projection of the connector; (<b>b</b>) front view (sectional drawing), with the projection of the connector, highlighting the regions on the GFRP connector with (blue) and without steel reinforcement (yellow).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Hole and spacing configuration of connectors, measured in millimeters [mm]: (<b>a</b>) SP-1-19.05; (<b>b</b>) SP-2-19.05; (<b>c</b>) SP-3-19.05; (<b>d</b>) SP-3-15.88; (<b>e</b>) SP-3-12.70; (<b>f</b>) SP-CTL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Push-out tests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cracking patterns (the arrows, in the images where they appear, represent the top of the connector): (<b>a</b>) SP-1-19.05; (<b>b</b>) SP-2-19.05; (<b>c</b>) SP-3-19.05; (<b>d</b>) SP-3-15.88; (<b>e</b>) SP-3-12.70; (<b>f</b>) SP-CTL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Load versus relative displacement response of the specimens: (<b>a</b>) SP-12.70-1.75; (<b>b</b>) SP 12.70 2.00; (<b>c</b>) SP-12.70-2.50; (<b>d</b>) SP-12.70-3.00; (<b>e</b>) SP-CTL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Experimental results: for the ultimate load comparing (<b>a</b>) the number of holes and (<b>b</b>) the hole diameter; for the relative displacement comparing (<b>c</b>) the number of holes and (<b>d</b>) the hole diameter; and for the initial stiffness comparing (<b>e</b>) the number of holes and (<b>f</b>) the hole diameter.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4231 KiB  
Article
Flexural Behavior of an RC Beam Externally Strengthened with a Steel- and CFRP-Based Method
by Yu Lin, Yang Wei, Zihan Gong, Wenping Xu and Kang Zhao
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(20), 9281; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209281 - 12 Oct 2024
Viewed by 681
Abstract
Reinforced concrete beam bridges are usually retrofitted by a steel plate or FRP. However, these two methods tend to result in disadvantages, e.g., construction complexity and debonding failure, owing to the corresponding material properties. In this study, a steel- and CFRP-based method is [...] Read more.
Reinforced concrete beam bridges are usually retrofitted by a steel plate or FRP. However, these two methods tend to result in disadvantages, e.g., construction complexity and debonding failure, owing to the corresponding material properties. In this study, a steel- and CFRP-based method is proposed to achieve the merits of typical retrofitting methods by combining a CFRP plate, a steel plate, and angle steel. To investigate the effect of the cooperative strengthening, six full-scale beam specimens were designed and are evaluated through a monotonic four-point bending test. The failure mode, load–deflection relationship, critical parameters, and crack development are systematically and sequentially analyzed. Finally, a predicting method is proposed to calculate the flexural capacity. The retrofitted beam is characterized by an acceptable load-bearing capacity and deformation capacity. With continuous retrofitting, the crack load and ultimate load can be improved up to 84.9% and 4.41 times, respectively. The steel plate and angle steel function in both the load bearing and the anchorage to the CFRP plate contributes more to the ultimate bearing capacity after the steel components yield. Finally, a calculating model is shown to accurately predict the ultimate bearing capacity after retrofitting, with an average error of 4.03%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Concept of the proposed method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Details for standard RC beam (unit: mm): (<b>a</b>) dimensions and reinforcement; (<b>b</b>) section A-A.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Details for retrofitted RC beam (unit: mm): (<b>a</b>) dimensions and cross-section for L2-A; (<b>b</b>) dimensions and cross-section for other retrofitted specimens; (<b>c</b>) cross-section for L3-C; (<b>d</b>) cross-section for L4-St-A; (<b>e</b>) cross-section for L5-C-St-A; (<b>f</b>) cross-section for L6-C-Ss-A.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Test setup (unit: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Failure modes: (<b>a</b>) L1; (<b>b</b>) L2-A; (<b>c</b>) L3-C; (<b>d</b>) L4-St-A; (<b>e</b>) L5-C-St-A; (<b>f</b>) L6-C-Ss-A.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Failure modes: (<b>a</b>) L1; (<b>b</b>) L2-A; (<b>c</b>) L3-C; (<b>d</b>) L4-St-A; (<b>e</b>) L5-C-St-A; (<b>f</b>) L6-C-Ss-A.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Load–deflection relationship.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of nominal load-bearing capacity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of nominal deflection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Crack development.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Calculating diagram for the retrofitted beam: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <mo>&lt;</mo> <msubsup> <mi>h</mi> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>′</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <mo>≥</mo> <msubsup> <mi>h</mi> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>′</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 9287 KiB  
Article
Fatigue and Ultimate Strength Evaluation of GFRP-Reinforced, Laterally-Restrained, Full-Depth Precast Deck Panels with Developed UHPFRC-Filled Transverse Closure Strips
by Mahmoud Sayed Ahmed, Khaled Sennah and Hamdy M. Afefy
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(19), 8806; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198806 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 896
Abstract
A depth precast deck panel (FDDP) is one element of the prefabricated bridge element and systems (PBES) that allows for quick un-shored assembly of the bridge deck on-site as part of the accelerated bridge construction (ABC) technology. This paper investigates the structural response [...] Read more.
A depth precast deck panel (FDDP) is one element of the prefabricated bridge element and systems (PBES) that allows for quick un-shored assembly of the bridge deck on-site as part of the accelerated bridge construction (ABC) technology. This paper investigates the structural response of full-depth precast deck panels (FDDPs) constructed with new construction materials and connection details. FDDP is cast with normal strength concrete (NSC) and reinforced with high modulus (HM) glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) ribbed bars. The panel-to-girder V-shape connections use the shear pockets to accommodate the clustering of the shear connectors. A novel transverse connection between panels has been developed, featuring three distinct female-to-female joint configurations, each with 175-mm projected GFRP bars extending from the FDDP into the closure strip, complemented by a female vertical shear key and filled with cementitious materials. The ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) was selectively used to joint-fill the 200-mm transverse joint between adjacent precast panels and the shear pockets connecting the panels to the supporting girders to ensure full shear interaction. Two actual-size FDDP specimens for each type of the three developed joints were erected to perform fatigue tests under the footprint of the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC) truck wheel loading. The FDDP had a 200-mm thickness, 2500-mm width, and 2400-mm length in traffic direction; the rest was over braced steel twin girders. Two types of fatigue test were performed: incremental variable amplitude fatigue (VAF) loading and constant amplitude fatigue (CAF) loading, followed by monotonically loading the slab ultimate-to-collapse. It was observed that fatigue test results showed that the ultimate capacity of the slab under VAF loading or after 4 million cycles of CAF exceeded the factored design wheel load specified in the CHBDC. Also, the punching shear failure mode was dominant in all the tested FDDP specimens. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Details of GFRP bars joints. (<b>a</b>) Concrete dimensions and reinforcement detailing of A-joint; (<b>b</b>) Image of A-joint before adding transverse bars for slabs S1 and S2; (<b>c</b>) Concrete dimensions and reinforcement detailing of C-joint; (<b>d</b>) Photo of C-joint with projecting GFRP bars for slabs S3 and S4; (<b>e</b>) Arrangement of GFRP bars projecting into the Z-joint; (<b>f</b>) Arrangement of GFRP bars projecting into the zigzag-joint (Z-shape) for slabs S5 and S6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Details of steel twin-girder system supporting the precast FDDPs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Details and construction of the precast FDDP showing different joints.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Panel-to-girder connection of the precast FDDP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Adopted loading history.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>View of the test setup for fatigue loading and the monotonic loading for the FDDP system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Static load-deflection curves for slab S1 after being subjected to CAF loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Static load-deflection curves for slab S1 after being subjected to CAF loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Crack pattern after failure of slabs S1, S3, and S5 having A-joint, C-joint, and Z-joint tested under CAF loading followed by static load test to collapse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Crack pattern after failure of slabs S1, S3, and S5 having A-joint, C-joint, and Z-joint tested under CAF loading followed by static load test to collapse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Monotonic load-deflection curves for slab S3 during CAF loading and static load test to collapse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Monotonic load-deflection curves for slab S3 during CAF loading and static load test to collapse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Monotonic load-deflection history for slab S5 under CAF loading and static load test to-collapse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Views of punching shear failure of slabs S2, S4, and S6 tested under VAF loading to collapse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Static load-deflection curves of slab S2 with A-joint after every 100,000 cycles of VAF loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Monotonic load-deflection history for slab S6 at every 100,000 cycles of VAF loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Schematic diagrams of the punching shear crack patterns for the tested slabs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Degradation of the precast FDDPs with different joints details under CAF and VAF loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison among degradation of the precast FDDPs under CAF and VAF loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>P-N curves for the ribbed-surface GFRP-reinforced precast FDDPs [<a href="#B46-applsci-14-08806" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B47-applsci-14-08806" class="html-bibr">47</a>,<a href="#B62-applsci-14-08806" class="html-bibr">62</a>,<a href="#B63-applsci-14-08806" class="html-bibr">63</a>].</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 9752 KiB  
Article
Research on Temperature Control of Mass Concrete for Multi-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridge Cap during Construction
by Sheng Sun, Yongtao Zhang, Yanjun Lv, Xingshuang Xu, Zhihao Wang and Zujun Liu
Buildings 2024, 14(10), 3112; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103112 - 28 Sep 2024
Viewed by 635
Abstract
In the construction process of mass concrete structures, the large temperature gradient due to exothermic hydration makes the mass concrete highly susceptible to cracking. This paper carried out research on temperature control methods of mass concrete for the purpose of ensuring construction quality [...] Read more.
In the construction process of mass concrete structures, the large temperature gradient due to exothermic hydration makes the mass concrete highly susceptible to cracking. This paper carried out research on temperature control methods of mass concrete for the purpose of ensuring construction quality based on the construction of Fengyi cable-stayed bridge caps. Firstly, the temperature and stress change rule in the concrete pouring process of the caps was analyzed though the finite element method (FEM). Then, targeted-oriented comprehensive temperature control schemes were formulated according to the structural characteristics and construction environment of the cap, including the optimization of the material ratio, the arrangement of crack-resistant reinforcing steel, the design of a water pipe cooling scheme and reasonable maintenance. Finally, the whole bridge cap construction process using the optimized water pipe cooling solution was monitored, and the temperature gap between inside and outside the concrete satisfied the specification requirements rigorously. In the concrete demolding session, the concrete surface was smooth and no cracks were found, which indicates the temperature control scheme is reasonable and effective. The research results have reference significance for the pouring and temperature control of mass concrete for bridge caps. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Construction Management, and Computers & Digitization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of Fengyi Bridge (unit: cm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The pile caps and the underneath piles (unit: cm). (<b>a</b>) Side view of P1 and P3 (<b>b</b>) side view of P2 (<b>c</b>) top view of the cap at P1 and P3 (<b>d</b>) top view of the cap at P2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Temperature control flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Layout of cooling water pipes (unit: cm). (<b>a</b>) Vertical layout, (<b>b</b>) horizontal layout, and (<b>c</b>) horizontal layout.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Boundary conditions applied to different elements of the bridge cap. (<b>a</b>) Boundary condition #1 and (<b>b</b>) boundary condition #2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Different boundary conditions. (<b>a</b>) heat transfer path from concrete to water pipe and (<b>b</b>) calculated cross-section along the direction of flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>FEM model of the bridge cap and the cooling pipes. (<b>a</b>) Modeling the bridge cap and (<b>b</b>) the distribution of cooling pipes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The internal temperature of the first concrete layer. (<b>a</b>) Temperature of the first casting, (<b>b</b>) temperature at the height of the layer 1 water pipe, (<b>c</b>) temperature at the height of the layer 2 water pipe, and (<b>d</b>) temperature variation curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The internal temperature of second concrete layer. (<b>a</b>) Temperature of the second casting, (<b>b</b>) temperature at the height of the layer 3 water pipe, (<b>c</b>) temperature at the height of the layer 4 water pipe, and (<b>d</b>) temperature variation curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>The internal temperature of second concrete layer. (<b>a</b>) Temperature of the second casting, (<b>b</b>) temperature at the height of the layer 3 water pipe, (<b>c</b>) temperature at the height of the layer 4 water pipe, and (<b>d</b>) temperature variation curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The stress distribution of the first concrete layer. (<b>a</b>) The internal stress distribution of the first concrete layer, (<b>b</b>) the stress at the height of the layer 1 water pipe, (<b>c</b>) the stress at the height of the layer 2 water pipe, and (<b>d</b>) stress variation curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The stress distribution of the second concrete layer. (<b>a</b>) The internal stress distribution of the second concrete layer, (<b>b</b>) the stress at the height of the layer 3 water pipe, (<b>c</b>) the stress at the height of the layer 4 water pipe, and (<b>d</b>) stress variation curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>TW80 concrete wireless thermometer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The size of the bridge cap and the layout of measuring points (unit: mm). (<b>a</b>) The layout of the measurement points, (<b>b</b>) the measurement points along the transverse bridge, (<b>c</b>) the measurement points along the longitudinal bridge, and (<b>d</b>) the measurement points along the height direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The temperature curves of the first concrete layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The temperature difference curves of the first concrete layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The temperature curves of the second concrete layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The temperature difference curves of the second concrete layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>The surface of mass concrete after casting.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 6080 KiB  
Article
Seismic Fragility Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Simply Supported Girder Bridges Resting on Double-Column Piers for High Speed Railway
by Yongzheng Zhou, Ce Gao, Sibo Yang, Wei Guo and Liqiang Jiang
Buildings 2024, 14(10), 3072; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103072 - 26 Sep 2024
Viewed by 793
Abstract
This study investigates the probabilistic seismic damage characteristics of a five-span RC simply supported girder bridge with double-column piers designed for a high-speed railway (HSR). The objective is to assess the bridge’s fragility by developing a refined nonlinear numerical model using the OpenSEES [...] Read more.
This study investigates the probabilistic seismic damage characteristics of a five-span RC simply supported girder bridge with double-column piers designed for a high-speed railway (HSR). The objective is to assess the bridge’s fragility by developing a refined nonlinear numerical model using the OpenSEES (Version 3.3.0) platform. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) was conducted with peak ground accelerations (PGA) ranging from 0.05 g to 0.5 g, and fragility curves for pier columns, tie beams, and bearings were developed. Additionally, a series–parallel relationship and a hierarchically iterated pair copula model were established to evaluate system fragility. The results indicate that as PGA increases, the damage probability of all bridge components rises, with bearings being the most vulnerable, followed by pier columns, and tie beams exhibiting the least damage. The models accurately simulate the correlations between members and system fragility, offering valuable insights into the bridge’s performance under seismic conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Study on Seismic Performance of Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the bridge layout (unit: m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of the bearing layout.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Finite element model of the bridge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic diagram of the finite element model in Midas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison between the acceleration mean spectrum of ground motions and the code spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Curvature envelopes of the pier columns and tie beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Bending moment–curvature diagrams of key sections for pier columns and tie beams. (<b>a</b>) Pier bottom section. (<b>b</b>) Pier and tie beam bottom section. (<b>c</b>) Section at both ends of tie beam.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>IDA curves of key sections for pier columns and tie beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Probabilistic seismic demand models of the bridge components.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Fragility curves of key sections for pier columns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Fragility curves of key sections for tie beams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Moment envelopes of P1 and P2 (excited by the RSN1338 ground motion).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Peak axial force responses of the pier and tie beam bottom sections under different working conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Fragility curves of bearings. (<b>a</b>) Minor damage to fixed bearing and longitudinal movable bearing. (<b>b</b>) Moderate damage to fixed bearing and longitudinal movable bearing. (<b>c</b>) Severe damage to fixed bearing and longitudinal movable bearing. (<b>d</b>) Complete damage to fixed bearing and longitudinal movable bearing. (<b>e</b>) Minor damage to transverse, multidirectional movable bearing. (<b>f</b>) Moderate damage to transverse, multidirectional movable bearing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Schematic diagram of the series–parallel relations between members and the hierarchically iterated pair copula model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Fragility curves of the system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Comparison of fragility curves between the copula function method and first-order bound method.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 14444 KiB  
Article
Structural Response of Post-Tensioned Slabs Reinforced with Forta-Ferro and Conventional Shear Reinforcement under Impact Load
by Sandy Chaaban, Yehya Temsah, Ali Jahami and Mohamad Darwiche
Fibers 2024, 12(10), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib12100079 - 26 Sep 2024
Viewed by 699
Abstract
Several researchers have studied how impact loads from impact hazards affect reinforced concrete (RC) slabs. There is relatively little research on impact loading effects on pre-stressed structures. The usage of fibers in structural elements intrigued researchers. In this paper, impact-loaded post-tensioned (PT) slabs [...] Read more.
Several researchers have studied how impact loads from impact hazards affect reinforced concrete (RC) slabs. There is relatively little research on impact loading effects on pre-stressed structures. The usage of fibers in structural elements intrigued researchers. In this paper, impact-loaded post-tensioned (PT) slabs with and without Forta-Ferro fibers were compared to post-tensioned slabs with plain concrete and conventional shear reinforcement. Forta-Ferro is a lightweight, low-cost fiber, and hence its effects on slab structural response under impact load deserve to be explored. Post-tensioned slabs’ impact resistance and energy absorption were tested using real-world situations of rapid and severe loads. Four identical 3.3 by 1.5 m concrete slabs were utilized in the experiment. The experiment involved dropping a 600 kg iron ball from 8 m onto each slab’s center of gravity. The slabs’ responses were investigated. The four slab configurations were tested for displacement, energy absorption, and cracking. Forta-Ferro fiber reinforcement is understudied, making this study significant. The study’s findings may help us comprehend fiber-reinforced concrete PT slabs’ impact resistance and structural performance. Engineers and designers of impact-prone buildings like slabs and bridges will benefit from the findings. The study also suggests adding Forta-Ferro fibers to post-tensioned slabs to improve durability and resilience against unanticipated impact hazards. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Cross-sections A-A and B-B for PT slabs with and without shear reinforcement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Tendon profile of PT slabs without and with shear reinforcement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Support system(triangle in the figure represents underground concrete mix for footing).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Crane holding the impactor in position prior to free-fall release.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Tested slab configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Data acquisition system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Labview code simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Sample of Forta-Ferro fibers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Cylinder compressive strengths.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Cylinder tensile strengths.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison between maximum compressive and tensile strengths.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Tested slabs after impact. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) Tension zones in PT-C, PT-F, PT-S, and PT-FS respectively. (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) Compression zones in PT-C, PT-F, PT-S, and PT-FS respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Displacement vs. time under impact load.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Acceleration curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>First two peak accelerations.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 8059 KiB  
Article
Study on the Flexural Performance of Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete–Normal Concrete Composite Slabs
by Zizhou Sun, Xianjing Li and Chao Liu
Materials 2024, 17(18), 4675; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17184675 - 23 Sep 2024
Viewed by 684
Abstract
In recent years, there have been an increasing number of examples of using ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) as a pavement layer to form an ultrahigh-performance concrete–normal concrete (UHPC–NC) composite structure to improve the bearing capacity of bridges. In order to study the flexural performance [...] Read more.
In recent years, there have been an increasing number of examples of using ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) as a pavement layer to form an ultrahigh-performance concrete–normal concrete (UHPC–NC) composite structure to improve the bearing capacity of bridges. In order to study the flexural performance of this kind of structure, this research studied the flexural performance of UHPC–NC composite slabs, with UHPC in the compression zone, using experiments, numerical simulation, and theoretical analysis. The results showed the following. Firstly, after the UHPC–NC interface had been chiseled, there was no obvious slip between the two materials during the test, and the composite plate was always subjected to synergistic stress. Secondly, the composite slabs in the compression zone of the UHPC were all subjected to bending failure, and the cooperative working performance of each part under the bending load was good, indicating that the composite slab had a unique failure mode and a high bearing capacity. Thirdly, increasing the thickness of the UHPC significantly improved the flexural capacity of the composite plate, and the maximum increase was about 15%. Increasing the reinforcement ratio of the tensile steel rebars also had an increasing effect, with a maximum increase of about 181%. Finally, the proposed formula for calculating the flexural capacity of composite slabs with UHPC in the compression zone could accurately predict the bearing capacity of said slabs. The calculated results were in good agreement with the experimental values, and the error was small. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Research framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Dimensions of the specimens: (<b>a</b>) cross-section of B-1; (<b>b</b>) cross-section of B-2; (<b>c</b>) cross-section of B-3; and (<b>d</b>) longitudinal section of specimens. The blue shaded region represents the thickness of the UHPC, whereas the unshaded region represents the thickness of the concrete. All dimensions are in millimeters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Preparation and casting of the specimens: (<b>a</b>) mixing the UHPC; (<b>b</b>) the chiseling treatment; and (<b>c</b>) curing the specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagram of the loading mode and the measuring points’ layout in the test; all dimensions are in millimeters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Layout diagram of the tensile steel strain gauge: (<b>a</b>) B-1 and B-2; and (<b>b</b>) B-3. All dimensions are in millimeters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Setup of the loading test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cracking patterns in the test: (<b>a</b>) B-1; (<b>b</b>) enlarged images of the cracks in B-1; (<b>c</b>) B-2; (<b>d</b>) enlarged images of the cracks in B-2; and (<b>e</b>) B-3; (<b>f</b>) enlarged images of the cracks in B-3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Cracking patterns in the test: (<b>a</b>) B-1; (<b>b</b>) enlarged images of the cracks in B-1; (<b>c</b>) B-2; (<b>d</b>) enlarged images of the cracks in B-2; and (<b>e</b>) B-3; (<b>f</b>) enlarged images of the cracks in B-3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Load−displacement curves of composite slabs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Load–strain curve of concrete: (<b>a</b>) B-1; (<b>b</b>) B-2; and (<b>c</b>) B-3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Load–strain curve of the tensile steel rebars: (<b>a</b>) B-1; (<b>b</b>) B-2; and (<b>c</b>) B-3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Concrete strain of the mid-span section of composite slabs: (<b>a</b>) B-1; (<b>b</b>) B-2; and (<b>c</b>) B-3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Constitutive relationship of concrete under compression in the finite element model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Constitutive relationship of the tensile performance of ordinary concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Constitutive relationship of the compression of ordinary concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Tensile constitutive relationship of UHPC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Constitutive relationship of the compression of UHPC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Constitutive relationship of steel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Diagram of the finite element model: (<b>a</b>) side view; (<b>b</b>) vertical view; and (<b>c</b>) subdivision of the mesh.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Comparison of experimental and numerical simulation data: (<b>a</b>) B-1; (<b>b</b>) B-2; and (<b>c</b>) B-3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Analysis of the specimens’ parameters: (<b>a</b>) thickness of the UHPC; and (<b>b</b>) diameter of the tensile steel rebars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Simplified Model 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Simplified Model 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Standardized residual graph of the calculated results of the bending capacity.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop