Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (114)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = quad band

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 5693 KiB  
Article
Sea Surface Wind Speed Retrieval Using Gaofen-3-02 SAR Full Polarization Data
by Kuo Zhang, Yuxin Hu, Junxin Yang and Xiaochen Wang
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(4), 591; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040591 - 9 Feb 2025
Abstract
The primary payload onboard the Gaofen-3-02 (GF3-02) satellite is a C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) capable of achieving a maximum resolution of 1 m. This instrument is critical to monitor the marine environment, particularly for tracking sea surface wind speeds, an important marine [...] Read more.
The primary payload onboard the Gaofen-3-02 (GF3-02) satellite is a C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) capable of achieving a maximum resolution of 1 m. This instrument is critical to monitor the marine environment, particularly for tracking sea surface wind speeds, an important marine environmental parameter. In this study, we utilized 192 sets of GF3-02 SAR data, acquired in Quad-Polarization Strip I (QPSI) mode in March 2022, to retrieve sea surface wind speeds. Prior to wind speed retrieval for vertical-vertical (VV) polarization, radiometric calibration accuracy was analyzed, yielding good performance. The results showed a bias and root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.02 m/s and 1.36 m/s, respectively, when compared to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis V5 (ERA5) data. For horizontal–horizontal (HH) polarization, two types of polarization ratio (PR) models were introduced based on the GF3-02 SAR data. Combining these refitted PR models with CMOD5.N, the results for HH polarization exhibited a bias of −0.18 m/s and an RMSE of 1.25 m/s in comparison to the ERA5 data. Regarding vertical–horizontal (VH) polarization, two linear models based on both measured normalized radar cross sections (NRCSs) and denoised NRCSs were developed. The findings indicate that denoising significantly enhances the accuracy of wind speed measurements for VH polarization when dealing with low wind speeds. When compared against buoy data, the wind speed retrieval results demonstrated a bias of 0.23 m/s and an RMSE of 1.77 m/s. Finally, a comparative analysis of the above retrieval results across all three polarizations was conducted to further understand their respective performances. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The geolocations of the acquired QPSI mode data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The flow chart of the comparison process between ERA5 data and SAR data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The geolocations of the matched scene–buoy pairs. (<b>a</b>) Station 46002; (<b>b</b>) Station 51000; (<b>c</b>) Station 51004. The buoys are denoted by black dots. The red boxes represent the scenes that match the buoys.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The flow chart of the comparison process between buoy data and SAR data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The relationship between the absolute bias of NRCS at a wind speed bias of 0.5 m/s and wind speed for different incidence angles and relative wind directions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The disparity between the simulated NRCSs and the actual measured NRCSs in the subscene. The red horizontal lines indicate the threshold, which is 1.43 dB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Evaluating the consistency between the wind speeds derived from VV polarization data and the corresponding ERA5 wind speeds. (<b>a</b>) Scatter diagram; (<b>b</b>) histogram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The dependence of the PR in a linear unit on incidence angle and relative wind direction. (<b>a</b>) PR and incidence angle (<b>b</b>) PR and relative wind direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparisons of the three refitted models and the GF3-02 SAR data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparisons of the converted NRCS from HH polarization and the measured NRCS for VV polarization. (<b>a</b>) Refitted Elfouhaily model. (<b>b</b>) Refitted Thompson model. (<b>c</b>) Refitted Mouche model. (<b>d</b>) Refitted Mouche–azimuth model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Examinations of the wind speeds obtained from HH polarization against the ERA5 wind speeds. Scatter diagram: (<b>a</b>) Refitted Elfouhaily model. (<b>b</b>) Refitted Thompson model. (<b>c</b>) Refitted Mouche model. (<b>d</b>) Refitted Mouche–azimuth model. Histogram: (<b>e</b>) Refitted Elfouhaily model. (<b>f</b>) Refitted Thompson model. (<b>g</b>) Refitted Mouche model. (<b>h</b>) Refitted Mouche–azimuth model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Examinations of the wind speeds obtained from HH polarization against the ERA5 wind speeds. Scatter diagram: (<b>a</b>) Refitted Elfouhaily model. (<b>b</b>) Refitted Thompson model. (<b>c</b>) Refitted Mouche model. (<b>d</b>) Refitted Mouche–azimuth model. Histogram: (<b>e</b>) Refitted Elfouhaily model. (<b>f</b>) Refitted Thompson model. (<b>g</b>) Refitted Mouche model. (<b>h</b>) Refitted Mouche–azimuth model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Scatter plots of the NRCS for VH polarization and the matched ERA5 wind speeds. (<b>a</b>) Measured NRCS. (<b>b</b>) Denoised NRCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Examinations of the wind speeds retrieved from VH polarization in comparison with the ERA5 wind speeds. Scatter diagram: (<b>a</b>) Measured NRCS. (<b>b</b>) Denoised NRCS. Histogram: (<b>c</b>) Measured NRCS. (<b>d</b>) Denoised NRCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Examinations of the wind speeds retrieved from VH polarization in comparison with the buoy wind speeds. (<b>a</b>) Measured NRCS. (<b>b</b>) Denoised NRCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The distribution map of retrieved wind speed and wind speed bias compared with ERA5 data for the typhoon Hinnamnor. (<b>a</b>) Retrieved wind speed. (<b>b</b>) Wind speed bias.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The distribution of wind speed retrieval results of VV polarization, HH polarization and VH polarization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The spatial distribution of wind speed retrieval results (<b>a</b>) VV polarization. (<b>b</b>) HH polarization. (<b>c</b>) VH polarization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>The spatial distribution of retrieved wind speed bias compared with ERA5 wind speed. (<b>a</b>) VV polarization. (<b>b</b>) HH polarization. (<b>c</b>) VH polarization.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 12913 KiB  
Article
Soil Organic Carbon Estimation and Transfer Framework in Agricultural Areas Based on Spatiotemporal Constraint Strategy Combined with Active and Passive Remote Sensing
by Jiaxin Qian, Jie Yang, Weidong Sun, Lingli Zhao, Lei Shi, Hongtao Shi, Lu Liao, Chaoya Dang and Qi Dou
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(2), 333; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17020333 - 19 Jan 2025
Viewed by 458
Abstract
Mapping soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a crucial role in agricultural productivity and water management. This study discusses the potential of active and passive remote sensing for SOC estimation modeling in agricultural areas, incorporating synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data (L-band quad-polarization and C-band [...] Read more.
Mapping soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a crucial role in agricultural productivity and water management. This study discusses the potential of active and passive remote sensing for SOC estimation modeling in agricultural areas, incorporating synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data (L-band quad-polarization and C-band dual-polarization), multi-spectrum (MS) data, and brightness temperature (TB) data. The performance of five advanced machine learning regression (MLR) models for SOC modeling was assessed, focusing on spatial interpolation accuracy and cross-spatial transfer accuracy, using two field observation datasets for modeling and validation. Results indicate that the SOC estimation accuracy when using MS data alone is comparable to that of using TB data alone, and both perform slightly better than SAR data. Radar cross-polarization ratio index, microwave polarization difference index, shortwave infrared reflectance, and soil parameters (elevation and soil moisture) demonstrate high correlation with the measured SOC. Incorporating temporal features, as opposed to single-phase features, allows each regression model to reach its upper limit of SOC estimation accuracy. The spatial interpolation accuracy of each MLR algorithm is satisfactory, with the Gaussian process regression (GPR) model demonstrating optimal modeling performance. When SAR, MS, or TB data are used individually in modeling, the estimation errors (RMSE) for SOC are 0.637 g/kg, 0.492 g/kg, and 0.229 g/kg for the SMAPVEX12 sampling campaign, and 0.706 g/kg, 0.454 g/kg, and 0.474 g/kg for the SMAPVEX16-MB sampling campaign, respectively. After incorporating soil moisture and topographic factors, the above RMSEs for SOC are further reduced by 57.8%, 35.6%, and 3.5% for the SMAPVEX12, and by 18.4%, 8.8%, and 3.4% for the SMAPVEX16-MB, respectively. However, cross-spatial transfer accuracy of the regression models remains limited (RMSE = 0.866–1.043 g/kg and 0.995–1.679 g/kg for different data sources). To address this, this study reduces uncertainties in SOC cross-spatial transfer by introducing terrain factors sensitive to SOC (RMSE = 0.457–0.516 g/kg and 0.799–1.198 g/kg for different data sources). The proposed SOC estimation and transfer framework, based on active and passive remote sensing data, provides guidance for high-resolution regional-scale SOC mapping and applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Proximal and Remote Sensing for Low-Cost Soil Carbon Stock Estimation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geographical location of the study area, (<b>b</b>) observation ranges of the SMAPVEX12 (color rectangular box) and SMAPVEX16-MB datasets (black rectangular box), (<b>c</b>) radar incidence angle of UAVSAR image, (<b>d</b>) Pauli decomposition image, (<b>e</b>) SPOT-4 image, (<b>f</b>) land cover map in 2012.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Measured soil parameter information: (<b>a</b>) proportion of measured soil texture types and SOC of different crop plots during SMAPVEX12 sampling campaign; (<b>b</b>) is similar to (<b>a</b>), SMAPVEX16-MB; (<b>c</b>) measured soil roughness of different crop plots during SMAPVEX12 sampling campaign; (<b>d</b>) is similar to (<b>c</b>), SMAPVEX16-MB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Technical process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The distribution of the training sets and test sets of the measured SOC in modeling: (<b>a</b>) partition strategy of spatial interpolation accuracy, (<b>a1</b>) SMAPVEX12, (<b>a2</b>) SMAPVEX16-MB, (<b>b</b>) partition strategy of cross-spatial transfer accuracy, (<b>b1</b>) SMAPVEX12, (<b>b2</b>) SMAPVEX16-MB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Temporal correlation between different remote sensing features, soil parameters, and the measured SOC: (<b>a</b>) SMAPVEX12 sampling campaign, (<b>a1</b>) the relationship between the remote sensing features (L-band quad-pol SAR data, L-band TB data, and MS data) and the measured SOC, (<b>a2</b>) the relationship between the soil parameters (SSM, DEM, slope, RMSH, and CL) and the measured SOC, (<b>b</b>) SMAPVEX16-MB sampling campaign, (<b>b1</b>) the relationship between the measured SSM, L-band TB data, and the measured SOC, (<b>b2</b>) the relationship between the C-band dual-pol SAR data (Sentinel-1A) and the measured SOC, (<b>b3</b>) the relationship between the MS data (Sentinel-2A) and the measured SOC, (<b>b4</b>) is similar to (<b>a2</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Estimation accuracy of SOC by using different MLR algorithms under different feature groups: (<b>a</b>) SMAPVEX12 sampling campaign; (<b>a1</b>) remote sensing features involved; (<b>a2</b>) remote sensing features and soil parameters involved; (<b>a3</b>) SOC estimation results; (<b>b</b>) is similar to (<b>a</b>), SMAPVEX16-MB sampling campaign.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial transfer accuracy of SOC by using different MLR algorithms under different feature groups: (<b>a</b>) SMAPVEX12 sampling campaign, (<b>a1</b>) L-band quad-pol SAR features involved, (<b>a2</b>) quad-pol SAR features and DEM data involved, (<b>a3</b>) optical features involved, (<b>a4</b>) optical features and DEM data involved, (<b>a5</b>,<b>a6</b>) spatial transfer accuracy (R, MAE, and RMSE) of SOC with or without DEM data participation, (<b>b</b>) is similar to (<b>a</b>), SMAPVEX16-MB sampling campaign. C-band dual-pol SAR features.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 19010 KiB  
Article
C-SAR/02 Satellite Polarimetric Calibration and Validation Based on Active Radar Calibrators
by Yanan Jiao, Fengli Zhang, Xiaochen Liu, Zhiwei Huang and Jingwen Yuan
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(2), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17020282 - 15 Jan 2025
Viewed by 331
Abstract
Quad-polarization synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellites are important detection tools in Earth observation and remote sensing; in particular, they are of great significance for accurately interpreting radar data and inverting geophysical parameters. Polarimetric calibration is particularly critical to eliminate the effects of distortion [...] Read more.
Quad-polarization synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellites are important detection tools in Earth observation and remote sensing; in particular, they are of great significance for accurately interpreting radar data and inverting geophysical parameters. Polarimetric calibration is particularly critical to eliminate the effects of distortion in polarized SAR data. The C-SAR/02 satellite launched by China is an important part of the C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) constellation, and the quad-polarization strip I (QPSI) is an important imaging mode for its sea–land observation. The relevant research on its polarimetric calibration is still lacking. This study’s polarimetric calibration of C-SAR/02 was performed based on the active radar calibrator (ARC) method using four independently developed L/S/C multi-band ARCs and several trihedral corner reflectors (CRs). The polarimetric calibration distortion matrix varies along the range direction; the polarimetric calibration distortion matrix and polarimetric calibration accuracy along the range direction were analyzed, incorporating the devices in different range directions to calculate the distortion matrix. This approach improved the accuracy of the polarimetric calibration results and the effect of the quantization application of the C-SAR satellites. Moreover, our experimental results indicate that the method presented herein is suitable for the C-SAR/02 satellite and may also be more universally applicable to C-SAR-series satellites. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spaceborne SAR Calibration Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Equipment distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Basic structure of L/S/C ARC. (<b>a</b>) Structure diagram of ARC. (<b>b</b>) ARC antenna structural diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photograph of the ARC antenna structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Overall conditions of the experimental data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Polarization calibration experimental flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Characteristics of four ARCs on images of different polarizations. (<b>a</b>) HH-polarization. (<b>b</b>) HV-polarization. (<b>c</b>) VH-polarization. (<b>d</b>) VV-polarization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic diagram of the phase angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Polarization isolation metrics corresponding to different device groups. (<b>a</b>) Group 1. (<b>b</b>) Group 2. (The different colors are for differentiation, the hollow squares refer to the average value, and the diamonds indicate the value of each equipment indicator. The following are similar).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Amplitude imbalance metrics corresponding to different device groups. (<b>a</b>) Group 1. (<b>b</b>) Group 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Phase imbalance metrics corresponding to different device groups. (<b>a</b>) Group 1. (<b>b</b>) Group 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Theoretical characteristic diagram of trihedral CR. (<b>a</b>) Co-polarization response. (<b>b</b>) Co-polarized response.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of CR-1 polarization characteristics before and after calibration. (<b>a</b>) Co-polarization response before calibration. (<b>b</b>) Co-polarized response after calibration. (<b>c</b>) Cross-polarization response before calibration. (<b>d</b>) Cross-polarization response after calibration.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 30620 KiB  
Article
Characterizing Tidal Marsh Inundation with Synthetic Aperture Radar, Radiometric Modeling, and In Situ Water Level Observations
by Brian T. Lamb, Kyle C. McDonald, Maria A. Tzortziou and Derek S. Tesser
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(2), 263; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17020263 - 13 Jan 2025
Viewed by 501
Abstract
Tidal marshes play a globally critical role in carbon and hydrologic cycles by sequestering carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and exporting dissolved organic carbon to connected estuaries. These ecosystems provide critical habitat to a variety of fauna and also reduce coastal flood impacts. [...] Read more.
Tidal marshes play a globally critical role in carbon and hydrologic cycles by sequestering carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and exporting dissolved organic carbon to connected estuaries. These ecosystems provide critical habitat to a variety of fauna and also reduce coastal flood impacts. Accurate characterization of tidal marsh inundation dynamics is crucial for understanding these processes and ecosystem services. In this study, we developed remote sensing-based inundation classifications over a range of tidal stages for marshes of the Mid-Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico regions of the United States. Inundation products were derived from C-band and L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery using backscatter thresholding and temporal change detection approaches. Inundation products were validated with in situ water level observations and radiometric modeling. The Michigan Microwave Canopy Scattering (MIMICS) radiometric model was used to simulate radar backscatter response for tidal marshes across a range of vegetation parameterizations and simulated hydrologic states. Our findings demonstrate that inundation classifications based on L-band SAR—developed using backscatter thresholding applied to single-date imagery—were comparable in accuracy to the best performing C-band SAR inundation classifications that required change detection approaches applied to time-series imagery (90.0% vs. 88.8% accuracy, respectively). L-band SAR backscatter threshold inundation products were also compared to polarimetric decompositions from quad-polarimetric Phased Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar 2 (PALSAR-2) and L-band Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR) imagery. Polarimetric decomposition analysis showed a relative shift from volume and single-bounce scattering to double-bounce scattering in response to increasing tidal stage and associated increases in classified inundated area. MIMICS modeling similarly showed a relative shift to double-bounce scattering and a decrease in total backscatter in response to inundation. These findings have relevance to the upcoming NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) mission, as threshold-based classifications of wetland inundation dynamics will be employed to verify that NISAR datasets satisfy associated mission science requirements to map wetland inundation with classification accuracies better than 80% at 1 hectare spatial scales. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue NISAR Global Observations for Ecosystem Science and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study sites with Sentinel-1a VV backscatter multi-season composites (red = spring, green = summer, blue = fall) imagery and water level sensor locations (numbers in panels correspond to locations on U.S. map). Wheeler Marsh (1) and GCReW/Kirkpatrick Marsh (2) show our water level grid deployments as white symbols. Water level sensors in Blackwater NWR (3), the Wax Lake Delta (4), White Lake (5), and Sabine River (6) were deployed by other research groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Depictions of generalized scattering mechanisms for C-band and L-band SAR when imaging wetlands. The primary types of radar scattering interactions that are modeled in MIMICS for a wetland system, ordered by increasing scattering coherence include direct crown (i.e., direct canopy) scattering (1), direct ground scattering (2), and crown–ground scattering (3). Double-bounce scattering includes both crown–ground and ground–crown scattering directions (* schematic depicts only crown–ground). A secondary scattering component modeled in MIMICS is the crown–ground–crown interaction (4) which is depicted by the dotted two-direction arrow near the crown–ground depiction. A generalization of SAR signal backscatter intensity is depicted by line thickness. Dashed lines depict volume scattering as opposed to surface or double-bounce scattering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>PALSAR/PALSAR-2 L-band HH (<b>a</b>) and HV (<b>b</b>) polarizations compared to Sentinel-1 C-band VV (<b>c</b>) and VH (<b>d</b>) polarizations (2016–2019) as a function of Wheeler Marsh tidal stage for low-mid elevation marsh region dominated by dense <span class="html-italic">Spartina alterniflora</span> (NWI class E2EM1P). Horizontal lines are positioned at the pixel inundation thresholds of −14.0 dB for co-polarizations and −23.0 dB for cross-polarizations. PALSAR imagery shows complete separability for the lowest and highest tide imagery in both co- and cross-polarizations. Backscatter distributions are +/−1 standard deviation (SD) for each point.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Optical inundation products derived from Landsat imagery over Wheeler Marsh at high tide (&gt;=2.124 m). JRC maximum surface water extent computed over the Landsat 5–8 record (1985–2019) is shown in (<b>a</b>). Four out of ten water level sensors matched classified inundation from the JRC product. (<b>b</b>) The DWSE product derived from a single high–tide Landsat image from 1 December 2018. The DSWE product contains a more complex classification scheme than JRC in which 9/10 sensors corresponded to detected inundation as surface water or wetland classes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sentinel-1 C-band change detection (CD) inundation products over Wheeler Marsh. Classified 88.8% classification accuracy comparing SAR inundation products to in situ water level sensor inundation state (71/80) for eight total images. Four example images shown in (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) correspond to increasing tidal stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>PALSAR-1/2 L-band threshold-based inundation products over Wheeler Marsh. Inundation is classified where HH &lt; −14.0 dB and HV &lt; −23.0 dB (Equation (1)). 90% classification accuracy comparing SAR inundation products to in situ water level sensor inundation state (54/60). Panels (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) are ordered by increasing tidal stage. The Viridis color scale represents approximate water depth of inundated pixels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>MIMICS simulated total backscatter response for L-band PALSAR and C-band Sentinel-1 for 1 m and 2 m vegetated marsh canopies during the growing season ((<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), respectively). The horizontal dotted line depicts the location used in threshold-based classification in Equation (1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>C-band (<b>a</b>) vs. L-band (<b>b</b>) VV backscatter contributions from different scattering mechanisms for a marsh with a 2 m canopy height. Note that decibel units sum non-linearly for total scattering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>C-band (<b>a</b>) vs. L-band (<b>b</b>) HH backscatter contributions from different scattering mechanisms for a marsh with a 2 m canopy height. Note that decibel units sum non-linearly for total scattering.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Wheeler Marsh high tide (2.582 m) PALSAR-2 image comparison between van Zyl polarimetric decomposition (<b>a</b>) and backscatter threshold-based inundation classification overlaid on the polarimetric decomposition (<b>b</b>). For the van Zyl decomposition, RGB channels correspond to double-bounce, volume, and surface scattering, respectively, with all channels scaled between −4 to −20 dB. All tidal marsh-dominated areas around Wheeler Marsh, including the Great Meadows system to the southwest and the Housatonic River wetlands to the north, were shown as inundated in the threshold-based classification. Water level sensor validation showed 10/10 sensor locations correctly classified as inundated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of PALSAR-2 imagery over Blackwater NWR for low tide (left panels) and high tide (right panels). Vertically descending panels correspond to van Zyl decomposition (<b>a,b</b>), HH backscatter (<b>c,d</b>), and backscatter-threshold classified inundation extent (<b>e,f</b>). van Zyl RGB channels correspond to double-bounce, volume scattering, and surface scattering, respectively. All SAR images scaled between −20 and −4 dB. Classified inundated area increases greatly when comparing the low tide classification (<b>e</b>) to the high tide classification (<b>f</b>) for NWI tidal marshes. In the van Zyl decompositions, surface scattering dominates at low tide (<b>a</b>) indicating a primary backscatter response from a rough moist soil surface. High tide (<b>b</b>) shows a decrease in total backscatter magnitude for all scattering types and a relative shift from surface scattering (cyan) to double-bounce (red and brown) with some volume scattering occurring in low tide and high tide images alike.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Blackwater NWR cover class PALSAR-2 backscatter distributions for HH (<b>a</b>) and HV (<b>b</b>) polarizations for low tide and tide images from <a href="#remotesensing-17-00263-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a>. These cover classes were previously established in Lamb et al. (2019) [<a href="#B45-remotesensing-17-00263" class="html-bibr">45</a>] from a combination of ground surveys and aerial imagery and include upland forest, open water, tidal marsh, and estuarine forested wetlands (EFO). For the HH polarization, a threshold of −13.5 dB established for PALSAR imagery in Lamb et al. (2019) [<a href="#B45-remotesensing-17-00263" class="html-bibr">45</a>] is depicted as a black dashed line. The classification thresholds established in this publication of −14 dB for HH and −23 dB for HV are depicted as grey lines indicating good consistency with the findings from Wheeler Marsh.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Sabine River low tide (panels (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>)) and high tide (panels (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>)) UAVSAR imagery obtained on 12 August 2019 (tidal stage 0.497 m) and 23 September 2019 (tidal stage 0.939 m), respectively, showing van Zyl decompositions (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and overlaid backscatter-threshold inundation classifications (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>). Decompositions scaled between −4 to −20 dB for surface scattering (blue) and double-bounce (red), −10 to −26 for volume scattering (green). The southern Sabine River region is dominated by both palustrine and estuarine marshes, as indicated by the random forest cover classification [<a href="#B46-remotesensing-17-00263" class="html-bibr">46</a>] expanding beyond the UAVSAR swath. CRMS water level values are expressed in feet.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 6555 KiB  
Article
Mangrove Extraction from Compact Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Images Based on Optimal Feature Combinations
by Sijing Shu, Ji Yang, Wenlong Jing, Chuanxun Yang and Jianping Wu
Forests 2024, 15(11), 2047; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15112047 - 20 Nov 2024
Viewed by 614
Abstract
As a polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) mode capable of simultaneously acquiring abundant surface information and conducting large-width observations, compact polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (CP SAR) holds great promise for mangrove dynamics monitoring. Nevertheless, there have been no studies on mangrove identification using [...] Read more.
As a polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) mode capable of simultaneously acquiring abundant surface information and conducting large-width observations, compact polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (CP SAR) holds great promise for mangrove dynamics monitoring. Nevertheless, there have been no studies on mangrove identification using CP SAR. This study aims to explore the potential of C-band CP SAR for mangrove monitoring applications, with the objective of identifying the most effective CP SAR descriptors for mangrove discrimination. A systematic comparison of 52 well-known CP features is provided, utilizing CP SAR data derived from the reconstruction of C-band Gaofen-3 quad-polarimetric data. Among all the features, Shannon entropy (SE), a random polarimetric constituent (VB), Shannon entropy (SEI), and the Bragg backscattering constituent (VG) exhibited the best performance. By combining these four features, we designed three supervised classifiers—support vector machine (SVM), maximum likelihood (ML), and artificial neural network (ANN)—for comparative analysis experiments. The results demonstrated that the optimal polarimetric feature combination not only reduced the redundancy of polarimetric feature data but also enhanced overall accuracy. The highest accuracy of mangrove extraction reached 98.04%. Among the three classifiers, SVM outperformed the other classifiers in mangrove extraction, while ML achieved the highest overall classification accuracy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest and Urban Green Space Ecosystem Services and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area and data images. (<b>a</b>) Geographical location of the Leizhou Peninsula; (<b>b</b>) optical satellite image; (<b>c</b>) SAR data image in HH polarimetric mode; (<b>d</b>) SAR data image in VH polarimetric mode; (<b>e</b>) SAR data image in HV polarimetric mode; (<b>f</b>) SAR data image in VV polarimetric mode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Optimal polarimetric feature selection flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Euclidean distances between different classes in CP feature images. (<b>a</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between mangrove and water; (<b>b</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between mangrove and land; (<b>c</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between mangrove and seawater; (<b>d</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between water and land; (<b>e</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between water and seawater; (<b>f</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between land and seawater.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Euclidean distances between different classes in CP feature images. (<b>a</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between mangrove and water; (<b>b</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between mangrove and land; (<b>c</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between mangrove and seawater; (<b>d</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between water and land; (<b>e</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between water and seawater; (<b>f</b>) denotes the Euclidean distance between land and seawater.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>CP feature image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Differences in eigenvalue responses between mangroves and other cover classes in feature images with enhanced combined performance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SVM classification results are based on a single polarimetric feature input. Mangroves are shown in red, water in blue, land in yellow, and seawater in blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mangrove extraction results are based on a single polarimetric feature input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Classification results based on optimal polarimetric feature combination input. Mangroves are in red, water in blue, land in yellow, and seawater in blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mangrove extraction results based on optimal polarimetric feature combination input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of mangrove extraction accuracy, OA, and Kappa coefficient values of the different classifiers and features.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Euclidean distance and classification accuracy. (<b>a</b>) Euclidean distance and classification accuracy between mangrove and land, where O(M-L) denotes the Euclidean distance between mangrove and land in the feature image, and AM and AL denote the classification accuracy of mangrove and land, respectively. (<b>b</b>) Euclidean distance and classification accuracy between water and seawater, where O(W-S) denotes the Euclidean distance between water and seawater in the feature image, and AW and AS indicate the classification accuracy of water and seawater, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 14372 KiB  
Article
Calibration of Dual-Polarised Antennas for Air-Coupled Ground Penetrating Radar Applications
by Samuel J. I. Forster, Anthony J. Peyton and Frank J. W. Podd
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 4114; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16214114 - 4 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1140
Abstract
Radar polarimetry is a technique that can be used to enhance target detection, identification and classification; however, the quality of these measurements can be significantly influenced by the characteristics of the radar antenna. For an accurate and reliable system, the calibration of the [...] Read more.
Radar polarimetry is a technique that can be used to enhance target detection, identification and classification; however, the quality of these measurements can be significantly influenced by the characteristics of the radar antenna. For an accurate and reliable system, the calibration of the antenna is vitally important to mitigate these effects. This study presents a methodology to calibrate Ultra-Wideband (UWB) dual-polarised antennas in the near-field using a thin elongated metallic cylinder as the calibration object. The calibration process involves measuring the scattering matrix of the metallic cylinder as it is rotated, in this case producing 100 distinct scattering matrices from which the calibration parameters are derived, facilitating a robust and stable solution. The calibration procedure was tested and validated using a Vector Network Analyser (VNA) and two quad-ridged antennas, which presented different performance levels. The calibration methodology demonstrated notable improvements, aligning the performance of both functioning and under-performing antennas to equivalent specifications. Mid-band validation measurements indicated minimal co-polar channel imbalance (<0.3 dB), low phase error (<0.8°) and improved cross-polar isolation (≈48 dB). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental setup of the calibration measurement system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Rotation system diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Experimental setup of the B-Scan acquisition with Antenna-1, Antenna-2, 3-axis positioning system and sandpit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Magnitude of the ideal scattering matrix versus rotation angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Magnitude versus rotation angle performance of Antenna-1 and Antenna-2 pre- and post-calibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Pre- and post-calibration results of channel balance, cross-polar isolation and phase error across the frequency band (1–6.5 GHz).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Calibration performance of GPR data displayed using colour composite images of Pauli decomposition. Each colour channel (RGB) represents <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <msqrt> <mn>2</mn> </msqrt> </mfrac> </mstyle> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>H</mi> <mi>H</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>V</mi> <mi>V</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>G</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <msqrt> <mn>2</mn> </msqrt> </mfrac> </mstyle> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>H</mi> <mi>H</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mi>V</mi> <mi>V</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>B</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mn>2</mn> <msqrt> <mn>2</mn> </msqrt> </mfrac> </mstyle> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>H</mi> <mi>V</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 23937 KiB  
Article
A Dual-Band Patch Antenna with Combined Self-Decoupling and Filtering Properties and Its Application in Dual/Squad-Band Two-Element MIMO Array
by Jun-Yi Lv, Jun-Ming Zhang, Peng-Fei Lv and Li-Xin Xu
Sensors 2024, 24(21), 6833; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24216833 - 24 Oct 2024
Viewed by 808
Abstract
This paper proposes a dual-band patch antenna with combined self-decoupling and filtering properties, designed to suppress mutual coupling between two antenna elements both within the same dual-band and across different dual-bands. Initially, a dual-band aperture-coupled filtering patch antenna is designed, featuring a forked [...] Read more.
This paper proposes a dual-band patch antenna with combined self-decoupling and filtering properties, designed to suppress mutual coupling between two antenna elements both within the same dual-band and across different dual-bands. Initially, a dual-band aperture-coupled filtering patch antenna is designed, featuring a forked short-circuited SIR feedline with a quarter-wavelength open-ended stub and a U-shaped patch with two U-slots, which generate three controllable radiation nulls while introducing two additional resonant modes. The design steps are also provided in detail. Subsequently, the low mutual coupling phenomenon of two vertically placed aperture-coupled patch antennas is investigated, successfully developing a high-isolated dual-band two-element MIMO array I. Furthermore, the other quad-band two-element MIMO array II is designed, which utilizes the filtering response to significantly reduce mutual coupling across four bands. Finally, a dual-band filtering patch antenna element and two two-element MIMO arrays are fabricated and measured. The measurements and simulations validate the antenna’s low mutual coupling performance in multi-band MIMO arrays and demonstrate its strong potential for future wireless communication applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Array Signal Processing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The structure of the proposed dual-band filtering antenna element: (<b>a</b>) three-dimensional and side views. (<b>b</b>) Top view (Layer 1 and Layer 2). (<b>c</b>) Bottom view (Layer 2 and Layer 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simulated reflection coefficient and realized gain of the proposed antenna element.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Surface current distributions on patch and feedline at (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">fn1</span> = 3.44, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">fr1</span> = 3.74 GHz and (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">fr2</span> = 3.96 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Surface current distributions on patch at (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">fn2</span> = 4.89, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">fr3</span> = 5.43 GHz and (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">fr4</span> = 5.74 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Surface current distributions on patch and feedline at <span class="html-italic">fn3</span> = 6.9 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Performance of the proposed filtering antenna element 1 with different parameters. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mi>W</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>. (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mi>W</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>. (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simulated reflection coefficient and realized gain without and with matching stub.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Three-dimensional view of two vertically positioned aperture-coupled antennas. (<b>b</b>) Simulated S-parameters of Ref. Array 1 and Ref. Array 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Top views of (<b>a</b>) the two-element MIMO array I, (<b>b</b>) Ref. Array 3 and (<b>c</b>) Ref. Array 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Simulated S-parameters of the two-element MIMO array I, Ref. Array 3 and Ref. Array 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Electric filed distribution on (<b>a</b>) patches and (<b>b</b>) feedlines of two-element MIMO array I at 3.8 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Simulated realized gain of the two-element MIMO array I.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Top views of (<b>a</b>) the two-element MIMO array II, (<b>b</b>) Ref. Array 5 and (<b>c</b>) Ref. Array 6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Simulated (<b>a</b>) S-parameters and (<b>b</b>) realized gain of two-element MIMO array II, Ref. array 5 and Ref. array 6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Fabricated prototype of the antenna element 1 described in detail in <a href="#sensors-24-06833-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Simulated and Measured S-parameters and realized gain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Measured (simulated) radiation patterns at (<b>a</b>) 3.82 (3.87) GHz and (<b>b</b>) 5.54 (5.58) GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Fabricated prototype of the two-element MIMO array I.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>The measured and simulated (<b>a</b>) S-parameters and (<b>b</b>) realized gain of the two-element MIMO array I.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Measured (simulated) radiation patterns at (<b>a</b>) 3.83 (3.88) GHz and (<b>b</b>) 5.53 (5.59) GHz of the two-element MIMO array I when port 1 is excited and port 2 is loaded.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Fabricated prototype of the two-element MIMO array II.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>The measured and simulated (<b>a</b>) S-parameters and (<b>b</b>) realized gain of the two-element MIMO array II.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Measured (simulated) radiation patterns at (<b>a</b>) 3.28 (3.32) GHz and (<b>b</b>) 4.93 (4.99) GHz when port 1 was excited and (<b>c</b>) 3.84 (3.89) GHz and (<b>d</b>) 5.53 (5.57) GHz when port 2 was excited.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Performance variation of antennas at different heights of air layers.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 12726 KiB  
Article
Quad-Band Rectifier Circuit Design for IoT Applications
by Ioannis D. Bougas, Maria S. Papadopoulou, Achilles D. Boursianis, Sotirios Sotiroudis, Zaharias D. Zaharis and Sotirios K. Goudos
Technologies 2024, 12(10), 188; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12100188 - 2 Oct 2024
Viewed by 2502
Abstract
In this work, a novel quad-band rectifier circuit is introduced for RF energy harvesting and Internet of Things (IoT) applications. The proposed rectifier operates in the Wi-Fi frequency band and can supply low-power sensors and systems used in IoT services. The circuit operates [...] Read more.
In this work, a novel quad-band rectifier circuit is introduced for RF energy harvesting and Internet of Things (IoT) applications. The proposed rectifier operates in the Wi-Fi frequency band and can supply low-power sensors and systems used in IoT services. The circuit operates at 2.4, 3.5, 5, and 5.8 GHz. The proposed RF-to-DC rectifier is designed based on Delon theory and Greinacher topology on an RT/Duroid 5880 substrate. The results show that our proposed circuit can harvest RF energy from the environment, providing maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) greater than 81% when the output load is 0.511 kΩ and the input power is 12 dBm. In this work, we provide a comprehensive design framework for an affordable RF-to-DC rectifier. Our circuit performs better than similar designs in the literature. This rectifier could be integrated into an IoT node to harvest RF energy, thereby proving a green energy source. The IoT node can operate at various frequencies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue IoT-Enabling Technologies and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Typical RF energy harvesting system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Greinacher voltage multiplier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Voltage multiplier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Substrate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Impedance matching network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Quad-band rectifier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mn>11</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> Reflection coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>PCE versus <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mi>L</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(PCE) Power conversion efficiency versus <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> (input power).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Output voltage versus input power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Layout of the quad-band rectifier.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 34840 KiB  
Article
Miniaturized Multiband Substrate-Integrated Waveguide Bandpass Filters with Multi-Layer Configuration and High In-Band Isolation
by Yu Zhan, Yi Wu, Kaixue Ma and Kiat Seng Yeo
Electronics 2024, 13(19), 3834; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13193834 - 28 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1052
Abstract
This article presents a multiband bandpass filter structure with an in-line topology based on substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) technology. A multi-layer configuration is employed to achieve circuit miniaturization. By constructing the coupling matrix, the coupling relationships among all resonators are quantitatively characterized, enabling the [...] Read more.
This article presents a multiband bandpass filter structure with an in-line topology based on substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) technology. A multi-layer configuration is employed to achieve circuit miniaturization. By constructing the coupling matrix, the coupling relationships among all resonators are quantitatively characterized, enabling the extraction of the theoretical frequency response and guiding circuit modeling and optimization. We designed and fabricated a third-order tri-band SIW filter and a third-order quad-band SIW filter, achieving a return loss of nearly 20 dB across all passbands. The close agreement between simulated and measured results validates the proposed design model. Additionally, the high in-band isolation of over 40 dB is demonstrated between all adjacent bands, highlighting the potential applicability of this technology in multiband scenarios. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Structure of the designed third-order tri-band SIW filter (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>24</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>25.7</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>32</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>34</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12.2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>9.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Topology structure of the designed third-order tri-band SIW filter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variation in external quality factors with the input matching structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Variation in coupling coefficients with the iris size of the coupling slot for horizontal coupling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation in coupling coefficients with the length, width, and position of the coupling slot for vertical coupling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Theoretical frequency response of the designed third-order tri-band SIW filter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Structure of the designed third-order quad-band SIW filter (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>24</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>25.7</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>32</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>32.6</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mn>4</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>35.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12.2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>11.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>13</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Theoretical frequency response of the designed third-order quad-band SIW filter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Photograph of fabricated third-order tri-band SIW filter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Simulated and measured S-parameters of fabricated third-order tri-band SIW filter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Photograph of fabricated third-order quad-band SIW filter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Simulated and measured S-parameters of fabricated third-order quad-band SIW filter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Topology structure of fourth-order tri-band filter with cross-coupling and related theoretical frequency response.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 94594 KiB  
Article
Harbor Detection in Polarimetric SAR Images Based on Context Features and Reflection Symmetry
by Chun Liu, Jie Gao, Shichong Liu, Chao Li, Yongchao Cheng, Yi Luo and Jian Yang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(16), 3079; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16163079 - 21 Aug 2024
Viewed by 806
Abstract
The detection of harbors presents difficulties related to their diverse sizes, varying morphology and scattering, and complex backgrounds. To avoid the extraction of unstable geometric features, in this paper, we propose an unsupervised harbor detection method for polarimetric SAR images using context features [...] Read more.
The detection of harbors presents difficulties related to their diverse sizes, varying morphology and scattering, and complex backgrounds. To avoid the extraction of unstable geometric features, in this paper, we propose an unsupervised harbor detection method for polarimetric SAR images using context features and polarimetric reflection symmetry. First, the image is segmented into three region types, i.e., water low-scattering regions, strong-scattering urban regions, and other regions, based on a multi-region Markov random field (MRF) segmentation method. Second, by leveraging the fact that harbors are surrounded by water on one side and a large number of buildings on the other, the coastal narrow-band area is extracted from the low-scattering regions, and the harbor regions of interest (ROIs) are determined by extracting the strong-scattering regions from the narrow-band area. Finally, by using the scattering reflection asymmetry of harbor buildings, harbors are identified based on the global threshold segmentation of the horizontal, vertical, and circular co- and cross-polarization correlation powers of the extracted ROIs. The effectiveness of the proposed method was validated with experiments on RADARSAT-2 quad-polarization images of Zhanjiang, Fuzhou, Lingshui, and Dalian, China; San Francisco, USA; and Singapore. The proposed method had high detection rates and low false detection rates in the complex coastal environment scenarios studied, far outperforming the traditional spatial harbor detection method considered for comparison. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagram of harbor features. (<b>a</b>) Different harbors. (<b>b</b>) Port of Capri, Italy. (<b>c</b>) Harbor structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of proposed method. (<b>a</b>) Algorithm details. (<b>b</b>) Algorithm illustration, where (1) shows the Pauli pseudo-color image, (2) and (3) show the results of water and urban region extraction using Markov random field (MRF) segmentation, (4) and (5) show the results of region of interest (ROI) extraction, in which the white band is the extracted coastal narrow-band region and the red boxes are the extracted ROIs, (6) shows the result of ROI detection, in which the detected harbors are marked with red boxes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An example of a RADARSAT-2 harbor image (Dalian) affected by echo sidelobes. (<b>a</b>) The whole Pauli pseudo-color image, where the Dalian port is marked with a blue box. (<b>b</b>) The Dalian port area in (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagram of coastal narrow-band area extraction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The distribution of the co- and cross-polarization correlation coefficients (PCCs) on different bases in an image of San Francisco acquired with RADARSAT-2. (<b>a</b>) Pauli pseudo-color image. (<b>b</b>) The ground truth, where some urban, vegetation, and ocean regions are marked in red, green, and blue, respectively. (<b>c</b>) The pseudo-color image of three PCCs in (<a href="#FD7-remotesensing-16-03079" class="html-disp-formula">7</a>), where the red, green, and blue channels correspond to the horizontal, vertical, and circular PCCs, respectively. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) The horizontal, vertical, and circular PCC histograms, respectively, of the urban, vegetation, and water regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Pauli pseudo-color images (<b>a1–f1</b>) and ground truth (<b>a2–f2</b>) of experimental data. (<b>a1</b>,<b>a2</b>) Zhanjiang, China. (<b>b1</b>,<b>b2</b>) Fuzhou, China. (<b>c1</b>,<b>c2</b>) San Francisco, USA. (<b>d1</b>,<b>d2</b>) Singapore. (<b>e1</b>,<b>e2</b>) Lingshui, China. (<b>f1</b>,<b>f2</b>) Dalian, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Illustration results of proposed harbor detection method applied to an image of Singapore. (<b>a</b>) Pauli pseudo-color image and ground truth of harbors, which are marked with green boxes. (<b>b</b>) Segmentation result after abnormal water area processing. (<b>c</b>) Water extraction result. (<b>d</b>) Coastal narrow-band area. (<b>e</b>) Result of strong-scattering area of interest in narrow-band area. (<b>f</b>) Result of harbor ROIs, which are marked with red boxes. (<b>g</b>) Harbor ROIs in Pauli pseudo-color image marked with red boxes and incorrectly detected targets marked with white numbered rectangles. (<b>h</b>) Pseudo-color image generated based on horizontal, vertical, and circular co-polarization cross-polarization correlation powers. (<b>i</b>) Final harbor detection result, which are marked with red boxes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Results of proposed method in different scenarios, where the color boxes of different results are the same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-03079-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>. (<b>a<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mi> </semantics></math></b>–<b>f<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mi> </semantics></math></b>) Experimental results for image <span class="html-italic">i</span> in <a href="#remotesensing-16-03079-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>. (<b>a1</b>–<b>a6</b>) Pauli pseudo-color images and ground truth of harbors. (<b>b1</b>–<b>b6</b>) Results of water and urban region extraction. (<b>c1</b>–<b>c6</b>) Results of coastal narrow-band area determined according to coastline. (<b>d1</b>–<b>d6</b>) Results of harbor ROIs determined according to strong-scattering areas in narrow-band zone. (<b>e1</b>–<b>e6</b>) Results of harbor ROIs in Pauli pseudo-color images. (<b>f1</b>–<b>f6</b>) Harbor regions detected based on co- and cross-polarization correlation powers, where detected harbors are marked with red boxes and white numbers 1–3 denote false alarm targets caused by sea-crossing bridges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Results of proposed method in different scenarios, where the color boxes of different results are the same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-03079-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>. (<b>a<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mi> </semantics></math></b>–<b>f<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mi> </semantics></math></b>) Experimental results for image <span class="html-italic">i</span> in <a href="#remotesensing-16-03079-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>. (<b>a1</b>–<b>a6</b>) Pauli pseudo-color images and ground truth of harbors. (<b>b1</b>–<b>b6</b>) Results of water and urban region extraction. (<b>c1</b>–<b>c6</b>) Results of coastal narrow-band area determined according to coastline. (<b>d1</b>–<b>d6</b>) Results of harbor ROIs determined according to strong-scattering areas in narrow-band zone. (<b>e1</b>–<b>e6</b>) Results of harbor ROIs in Pauli pseudo-color images. (<b>f1</b>–<b>f6</b>) Harbor regions detected based on co- and cross-polarization correlation powers, where detected harbors are marked with red boxes and white numbers 1–3 denote false alarm targets caused by sea-crossing bridges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Results of proposed method for image of Zhanjiang with different narrow-band radii. (<b>a<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mi> </semantics></math></b>–<b>c<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mi> </semantics></math></b>) Experimental results for radius <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math><span class="html-italic">i</span> + 1. (<b>a1</b>–<b>a5</b>) Coastal arrow-band regions. (<b>b1</b>–<b>b5</b>) Results of harbor ROIs extracted. (<b>c1</b>–<b>c5</b>) Results of harbors detected, where correctly detected targets are marked in blue and false alarms in red.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Results of proposed method for image of Zhanjiang with different false alarm rates, where correctly detected targets are marked in blue and false alarms in red. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) Detection results for false alarm rates (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>) of 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.08, and 0.1, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Results of proposed method for image of Zhanjiang with different area ratio thresholds, where correctly detected targets are marked in blue and false alarms in red. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) Detection results for threshold values (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ρ</mi> </semantics></math>) of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Horizontal, vertical, and circular co- and cross-polarization correlation power histograms for water, vegetation, and artificial structures in harbor area. (<b>a</b>) Histogram of horizontal polarization correlation powers of the three areas (Harbor_urban for buildings, Harbor_veg for vegetation, and Harbor_water for water). (<b>b</b>) Histogram of vertical polarization correlation powers. (<b>c</b>) Histogram of circular polarization correlation powers. (<b>d</b>) Histogram of the three different polarization correlation powers in harbor area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>Horizontal, vertical, and circular co- and cross-polarization correlation power histograms for water, vegetation, and artificial structures in harbor area. (<b>a</b>) Histogram of horizontal polarization correlation powers of the three areas (Harbor_urban for buildings, Harbor_veg for vegetation, and Harbor_water for water). (<b>b</b>) Histogram of vertical polarization correlation powers. (<b>c</b>) Histogram of circular polarization correlation powers. (<b>d</b>) Histogram of the three different polarization correlation powers in harbor area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Harbor detection results of images 1–6 in <a href="#remotesensing-16-03079-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> obtained by using jetty scanning method (comparison method), where the detected ROIs and harbors are all marked with red boxes. (<b>a<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mi> </semantics></math></b>–<b>e<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mi> </semantics></math></b>) Results of image <span class="html-italic">i</span> of comparison method. (<b>a1</b>–<b>a6</b>) Results of water extraction. (<b>b1</b>–<b>b6</b>) Results based on scanning of two pairs of orthogonal directional jetties. (<b>c1</b>–<b>c6</b>) Harbor area detected by merging scanned jetties by distance. (<b>d1</b>–<b>d6</b>) Results for detected harbor areas on Pauli pseudo-color versions of multi-look images. (<b>e1</b>–<b>e6</b>) Results in Pauli pseudo-color versions of original images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>Harbor detection results of images 1–6 in <a href="#remotesensing-16-03079-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> obtained by using jetty scanning method (comparison method), where the detected ROIs and harbors are all marked with red boxes. (<b>a<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mi> </semantics></math></b>–<b>e<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mi> </semantics></math></b>) Results of image <span class="html-italic">i</span> of comparison method. (<b>a1</b>–<b>a6</b>) Results of water extraction. (<b>b1</b>–<b>b6</b>) Results based on scanning of two pairs of orthogonal directional jetties. (<b>c1</b>–<b>c6</b>) Harbor area detected by merging scanned jetties by distance. (<b>d1</b>–<b>d6</b>) Results for detected harbor areas on Pauli pseudo-color versions of multi-look images. (<b>e1</b>–<b>e6</b>) Results in Pauli pseudo-color versions of original images.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 4991 KiB  
Article
A 77 GHz Transmit Array for In-Package Automotive Radar Applications
by Francesco Greco, Emilio Arnieri, Giandomenico Amendola, Raffaele De Marco and Luigi Boccia
Telecom 2024, 5(3), 792-803; https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom5030040 - 14 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1400
Abstract
A packaged transmit array (TA) antenna is designed for automotive radar applications operating at 77 GHz. The compact dimensions of the proposed configuration make it compatible with standard quad flat no-lead package (QFN) technology. The TA placed inside the package cover is used [...] Read more.
A packaged transmit array (TA) antenna is designed for automotive radar applications operating at 77 GHz. The compact dimensions of the proposed configuration make it compatible with standard quad flat no-lead package (QFN) technology. The TA placed inside the package cover is used to focus the field radiated by a feed placed in the same package. The unit cell of the array is composed of two pairs of stacked patches separated by a central ground plane. A planar patch antenna surrounded by a mushroom-type EBG (Electromagnetic Band Gap) structure is used as the primary feed. An analytical approach is employed to evaluate the primary parameters of the suggested TA, including its directivity, gain and spillover efficiency. The final design has been refined using comprehensive full-wave simulations. The simulated gain is 14.2 dBi at 77 GHz, with a half-power beamwidth of 22°. This proposed setup is a strong contender for highly integrated mid-gain applications in the automotive sector. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Transmit array’s antenna configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Feeding patch antenna with EBG structure. a = 4.55 mm; b = 1.6 mm; c = 0.98 mm; d = 0.15 mm; e = 0.5 mm; s = 0.25 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dispersion diagram of the unit cell EBG structure printed on a Rogers RO3003 substrate. Dp = 1.05 mm; Wp = 0.7 mm; h_sub = 0.25 mm. Blue line: first mode; orange line: second mode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Normalized radiation patterns (E-plane) of the patch antenna with (black line) and without (grey line) mushroom-type EBGs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Transmit array unit cell structure. (<b>a</b>) 3D vies; (<b>b</b>) side view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simulated S21 in terms of phase (<b>a</b>) and magnitude (<b>b</b>) as a function of patch size (Lp) for different angles of incidence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Transmit array geometry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>x8 array: calculated gain (dashed line), directivity (continuous line) and spillover efficiency (dotted line) for different values of <span class="html-italic">f</span>/<span class="html-italic">D</span> (spacing λ/3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>x8 array: calculated directivity of the unit cell as a function of inter-element spacing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Simulated gain patterns (H plane) at 77 Hz for the EBG patch antenna with (black line) and without (gray line) a transmit array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Fabricated prototype of the transmit array. (<b>a</b>) A 12 × 12 mm<sup>2</sup> package. (<b>b</b>) The feed patch with the EBG (<b>c</b>) measurement setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Simulated (continuous line) and measured (dots) reflection coefficients.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Transmit array radiation pattern: comparison between full-wave simulations and measurements. The measured gain is 14.2 dBi.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 16746 KiB  
Article
Quad-Band 1 × 4 Linear MIMO Antenna for Millimeter-Wave, Wearable and Biomedical Telemetry Applications
by Rakesh N. Tiwari, K. Geetha Malya, Girigari Nandini, P. Baby Nikhitha, Deepti Sharma, Prabhakar Singh and Pradeep Kumar
Sensors 2024, 24(14), 4427; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144427 - 9 Jul 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1833
Abstract
In this paper, we present the design of a millimeter-wave 1 × 4 linear MIMO array antenna that operates across multiple resonance frequency bands: 26.28–27.36 GHz, 27.94–28.62 GHz, 32.33–33.08 GHz, and 37.59–39.47 GHz, for mm-wave wearable biomedical telemetry application. The antenna is printed [...] Read more.
In this paper, we present the design of a millimeter-wave 1 × 4 linear MIMO array antenna that operates across multiple resonance frequency bands: 26.28–27.36 GHz, 27.94–28.62 GHz, 32.33–33.08 GHz, and 37.59–39.47 GHz, for mm-wave wearable biomedical telemetry application. The antenna is printed on a flexible substrate with dimensions of 11.0 × 44.0 mm2. Each MIMO antenna element features a modified slot-loaded triangular patch, incorporating ‘cross’-shaped slots in the ground plane to improve impedance matching. The MIMO antenna demonstrates peak gains of 6.12, 8.06, 5.58, and 8.58 dBi at the four resonance frequencies, along with a total radiation efficiency exceeding 75%. The proposed antenna demonstrates excellent diversity metrics, with an ECC < 0.02, DG > 9.97 dB, and CCL below 0.31 bits/sec/Hz, indicating high performance for mm-wave applications. To verify its properties under flexible conditions, a bending analysis was conducted, showing stable S-parameter results with deformation radii of 40 mm (Rx) and 25 mm (Ry). SAR values for the MIMO antenna are calculated at 28.0/38.0 GHz. The average SAR values for 1 gm/10 gm of tissues at 28.0 GHz are found to be 0.0125/0.0079 W/Kg, whereas, at 38.0 GHz, average SAR values are 0.0189/0.0094 W/Kg, respectively. Additionally, to demonstrate the telemetry range of biomedical applications, a link budget analysis at both 28.0 GHz and 38.0 GHz frequencies indicated strong signal strength of 33.69 dB up to 70 m. The fabricated linear MIMO antenna effectively covers the mm-wave 5G spectrum and is suitable for wearable and biomedical applications due to its flexible characteristics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Communications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Antenna design evolution steps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>|S<sub>11</sub>| curves for various antenna designs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Single antenna design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>1 × 4 MIMO array antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>1 × 4 MIMO array antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Prototype antenna and S-parameter measurement setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simulated and measured S-parameters of 1 × 4 linear MIMO array antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Surface current distribution at 28.0 and 38.0 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Experimental setup of gain measurement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Simulated and measured realized gains and total radiation efficiencies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of radiation patterns at (<b>a</b>) 28.0 GHz and (<b>b</b>) 38.0 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Simulated and measured ECC and DG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Simulated and measured curves of MEG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Calculated TARC of linear MIMO array antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Simulated and measured CCL of MIMO antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Bending configuration of MIMO array antenna in x-direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Simulated and measured |S<sub>11</sub>/S<sub>22</sub>/S<sub>33</sub>/S<sub>44</sub>| curves at different radii along x-directions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Bending configuration of antenna along y-direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Simulated |S<sub>11</sub>/S<sub>22</sub>/S<sub>33</sub>/S<sub>44</sub>| curves at different radii along y-directions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Realized gains and total radiation efficiencies at different bending conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Proposed 1 × 4 MIMO antenna on cuboid phantom for SAR calculation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>SAR values of 1 × 4 MIMO array antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Link margin versus distance for the proposed MIMO antenna.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3540 KiB  
Article
Broad, Tunable and Stable Single-Frequency Erbium Fiber Compound-Ring Lasers Based on Parallel and Series Structures in L-Band Operation
by Yu-Ting Lai, Lan-Yin Chen, Teng-Yao Yang, Tsu-Hsin Wu, Chien-Hung Yeh, Kuan-Ming Cheng, Chun-Yen Lin, Chi-Wai Chow and Shien-Kuei Liaw
Photonics 2024, 11(7), 628; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11070628 - 1 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 819
Abstract
In this demonstration, we present two erbium-doped fiber (EDF) lasers, with series and parallel three sub-ring configurations, respectively, to achieve tunable channel output and stable single longitudinal mode (SLM) operation in the L-band range. Here, the fiber ring cavity contains the L-band EDF [...] Read more.
In this demonstration, we present two erbium-doped fiber (EDF) lasers, with series and parallel three sub-ring configurations, respectively, to achieve tunable channel output and stable single longitudinal mode (SLM) operation in the L-band range. Here, the fiber ring cavity contains the L-band EDF as a gain medium. Based on the measured results of the two quad-ring structures of the EDF lasers, tunable output bandwidth for the two lasers can be obtained from 1558.0 to 1618.0 nm simultaneously. All the 3 dB linewidths measured for both fiber lasers are 312.5 Hz over the effective wavelength output range. Furthermore, the related optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR), output power, output stabilities of the central wavelength and power, and equal output power range of the two proposed EDF lasers are also examined and discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advancements in Tunable Laser Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The presented EDF laser structure with three sub-rings in series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified diagram of achievable FSR selection for SLM generation through the Vernier effect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Output spectra of selected seven output wavelengths over an available tuning bandwidth of 1558.0 to 1618.0 nm. The dashed line is the original ASE spectrum of the L-band EDFA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Detected corresponding OSNR and output power of each lasing wavelength over the bandwidth of 1558.0 to 1618.0 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Measured electrical spectra at the selected seven wavelengths over the bandwidth of 1558.0 to 1618.0 nm through the delayed self-homodyne.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Measured and fitted electrical linewidth at the wavelength of 1588.0 nm with a center frequency of 55 MHz by self-heterodyne detection with series sub-rings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Obtained 3 dB Lorentzian linewidth of each wavelength produced by the presented quad-ring fiber lasering the wavelength-tuning scope at 1518.0 to 1618.0 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Observed oscillations of central wavelength and output power at the wavelength of 1558.0 nm through a measurement time of 40 min. (<b>b</b>) The relative oscillations of central wavelength and output power (Δλ and ΔP) over the whole tuning bandwidth during an observation of 40 min.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The presented EDF laser structure with three sub-rings in parallel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Output spectra of selected seven output wavelengths over an available tuning bandwidth of 1558.0 to 1618.0 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Detected corresponding OSNR and output power of each lasing wavelength in the tuning bandwidth of 1558.0 to 1618.0 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Measured electrical spectra at the selected seven wavelengths over the bandwidth of 1558.0 to 1618.0 nm with three sub-rings in parallel through the delayed self-homodyne.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Measured and fitted electrical linewidth at the wavelength of 1588.0 nm with a center frequency of 55 MHz by self-heterodyne detection with parallel sub-rings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The relative oscillations of central wavelength (Δλ) and output power (ΔP) over the whole tuning bandwidth from 1558.0 to 1618.0 nm during an observation period of 40 min.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 6177 KiB  
Article
Design and Analysis of a Quad-Band Antenna for IoT and Wearable RFID Applications
by Waqas Ali, N. Nizam-Uddin, Wazie M. Abdulkawi, Asad Masood, Ali Hassan, Jamal Abdul Nasir and Munezza Ata Khan
Electronics 2024, 13(4), 700; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13040700 - 8 Feb 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1793
Abstract
The role of antennas in wireless communication is critical for enabling efficient signal transmission and reception across various frequency bands, including those associated with IoT (Internet of Things), X-band, S-band, and RFID (radio-frequency identification) systems. This paper presents a small quadruple-band antenna with [...] Read more.
The role of antennas in wireless communication is critical for enabling efficient signal transmission and reception across various frequency bands, including those associated with IoT (Internet of Things), X-band, S-band, and RFID (radio-frequency identification) systems. This paper presents a small quadruple-band antenna with 25 × 40 × 1.5 mm3 dimensions designed for diverse wireless applications. It is adept at operating in the S-band (2.2 GHz), wireless local area network (WLAN) (5.7 GHz), microwave RFID frequency band (5.8 GHz), and X-band (7.7 GHz and 8.3 GHz). While the majority of existing research focuses on antennas covering two or three bands, our work stands out by achieving quad-band operation in the proposed antenna design. This antenna is constructed on a semiflexible Rogers RT5880 substrate, making it well-suited for wearable applications. Computer Simulation Technology (CST) Microwave studio (2019) simulation package software is chosen for design and analysis. The antenna design features a comb-shaped radiating structure, where each “tooth” is responsible for resonating at a distinct frequency with an appropriate bandwidth. The antenna retains stability in both free space and on-body wearability scenarios. It achieves a low specific absorption rate (SAR), meeting wearable criteria with SAR values below 1.6 W/Kg for all resonating frequencies. The proposed antenna demonstrates suitable radiation efficiency, reaching a maximum of 82.6% and a peak gain of 6.3 dBi. It exhibits a bidirectional pattern in the elevation plane and omnidirectional behavior in the azimuth plane. The antenna finds applications across multiple frequencies and shows close agreement between simulated and measured results, validating its effectiveness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RF/Microwave Circuits for 5G and Beyond, Volume II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Various applications of the proposed antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Reflection coefficient of a conventional rectangular patch antenna resonating at 2.2 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Design evolution stages: (<b>a</b>) single; (<b>b</b>) dual; (<b>c</b>) tri; and (<b>d</b>) quad-band.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Geometry of the proposed antenna (<b>a</b>) front view, and (<b>b</b>) back view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The fabricated prototype.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Reflection coefficient of fabricated and simulated antennas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Illustration of the simulated 3-D radiation pattern at 5.7 GHz, showcasing (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>90</mn> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>90</mn> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> orientations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Illustration of the measured 2-D radiation pattern at 5.7 GHz, showcasing (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>90</mn> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>90</mn> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> orientations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Antenna’s radiation efficiency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The antenna’s gain profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Distribution of surface current at (<b>a</b>) 2.2, (<b>b</b>) 5.7, (<b>c</b>) 7.7, and (<b>d</b>) 8.3 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Variation in input impedance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Antennas performance with and without phantom.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>SAR<sub>1g</sub> values at (<b>a</b>) 2.2, (<b>b</b>) 5.7, (<b>c</b>) 7.7, and (<b>d</b>) 8.3 GHz frequencies.</p>
Full article ">
8 pages, 14144 KiB  
Communication
A Quad-Band Highly Selective Frequency Selective Surface with Ultra-Wideband Rejection
by Minrui Wang, Zheng Xiang, Yi Li, Baoyi Xu and Long Yang
Micromachines 2024, 15(1), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15010126 - 11 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1532
Abstract
In this paper, a highly selective quad-band frequency selective surface (FSS) with ultra-wideband rejection is presented. The proposed FSS structure was developed by cascading five metallic layers by three thin dielectric substrates. The five metallic layers are composed of two bent slot layers, [...] Read more.
In this paper, a highly selective quad-band frequency selective surface (FSS) with ultra-wideband rejection is presented. The proposed FSS structure was developed by cascading five metallic layers by three thin dielectric substrates. The five metallic layers are composed of two bent slot layers, two metallic square rings, and a metal patch. The dimensions of the unit cell are 0.13λ0× 0.13λ0× 0.18λ0 (λ0 is the free-space wavelength at the first operating frequency). The proposed structure achieves four transmission bands and has two wide stop-bands located at 1 to 5.5 GHz and 14 to 40 GHz, with a suppressed transmission coefficient below −20 dB. In order to verify the simulation results, an FSS prototype was fabricated and measured. It can be observed that the measured results are in favorable agreement with the simulation results. Its multiple narrow passbands and highly selective and ultra-wideband rejection properties ensure that our design can play a significant role in narrowband antennas, spatial filters, and many other fields. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section D:Materials and Processing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Unit cell of the proposed FSS. (<b>b</b>) Layers 1 and 5 of the unit cell. (<b>c</b>) Layers 2 and 4 of the unit cell. (<b>d</b>) Layer 3 of the unit cell. The specific sizes are <span class="html-italic">D</span> = 6 mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>l</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.55 mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>l</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.57 mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>l</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.625 mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.15 mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.57 mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 3.86 mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 4.85 mm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 1 mm, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 2.6 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Transmission coefficients in the proposed unit evolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Established ECM of the designed FSS. <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.23 nH, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.158 nH, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 2.591 pF, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.374 pF, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> = 0.28 pF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of the proposed FSS transmission coefficient. (<b>a</b>) TE and TM. (<b>b</b>) HFSS and ECM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Surface current and electric field distributions at 6.54 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simulated transmission coefficients under different incidence angles and polarizations. (<b>a</b>) TE polarization. (<b>b</b>) TM polarization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Photograph of the fabricated FSS structure. (<b>b</b>) Photograph of free-space measurement environment. (<b>c</b>) Photograph of measurement environment under oblique incidence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Measured transmission coefficients of the structure under oblique angles and polarizations. (<b>a</b>) TE polarization. (<b>b</b>) TM polarization.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop