Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (49)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = stratospheric balloon

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 4253 KiB  
Article
Path Planning for Autonomous Balloon Navigation with Reinforcement Learning
by Yingzhe He, Kai Guo, Chisheng Wang, Keyi Fu and Jiehao Zheng
Electronics 2025, 14(1), 204; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14010204 - 6 Jan 2025
Viewed by 743
Abstract
In the stratosphere, the use of winds to navigate balloons has emerged as a practical approach for Earth observation, collecting meteorological data, and other applications. However, controlling such balloons is challenging due to imperfect wind data and the need for real-time decisions. Research [...] Read more.
In the stratosphere, the use of winds to navigate balloons has emerged as a practical approach for Earth observation, collecting meteorological data, and other applications. However, controlling such balloons is challenging due to imperfect wind data and the need for real-time decisions. Research in this field predominantly concentrates on station-keeping missions, but there is an absence of studies on stratospheric balloon path planning. In this work, we employ deep reinforcement learning to train a controller that guides the balloon from a random starting point to a target range within a simulated wind field that changes over time and space. The results prove the feasibility of using reinforcement learning for superpressure balloon path planning in complex, dynamic wind fields, and the RL controller outperforms the hand-crafted baseline controller, achieving faster navigation with a higher success rate. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Path planning with a superpressure balloon in wind field. The dashed line represents the flight path of the balloon. The station ranges are shown in cyan and the target ranges are shown in black. The arrows represent the wind field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Structural diagram of an superpressure balloon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Training process of DQN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Success rates in different training phases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Average success time in different training phases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The cumulative episode reward and success rate. The blue lines represents the moving average of rewards and success rates with a window size of 200.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Success rates by controllers and radius of target.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Average success time of different controllers and radii of target.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Flight path of the RL controller and baseline controller with same random seed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Variation in balloon–target distance and wind speed over time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Success rates of different initial positions’ distances from station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Average success time by different initial positions distance from station.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 13796 KiB  
Article
The BIRDIES Experiment: Measuring Beryllium Isotopes to Resolve Dynamics in the Stratosphere
by Sonia Wharton, Alan J. Hidy, Thomas S. Ehrmann, Wenbo Zhu, Shaun N. Skinner, Hassan Beydoun, Philip J. Cameron-Smith, Marisa Repasch, Nipun Gunawardena, Jungmin M. Lee, Ate Visser, Matthew Griffin, Samuel Maddren and Erik Oerter
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1502; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121502 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 973
Abstract
Cosmogenic beryllium-10 and beryllium-7, and the ratio of the two (10Be/7Be), are powerful atmospheric tracers of stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) processes; however, measurements are sparse for altitudes well above the tropopause. We present a novel high-altitude balloon campaign aimed to measure these isotopes in [...] Read more.
Cosmogenic beryllium-10 and beryllium-7, and the ratio of the two (10Be/7Be), are powerful atmospheric tracers of stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) processes; however, measurements are sparse for altitudes well above the tropopause. We present a novel high-altitude balloon campaign aimed to measure these isotopes in the mid-stratosphere called Beryllium Isotopes for Resolving Dynamics in the Stratosphere (BIRDIES). BIRDIES targeted gravity waves produced by tropopause-overshooting convection to study their propagation and impact on STE dynamics, including the production of turbulence in the stratosphere. Two custom-designed payloads called FiSH and GASP were flown at altitudes approaching 30 km to measure in situ turbulence and beryllium isotopes (on aerosols), respectively. These were flown on nine high-altitude balloon flights over Kansas, USA, in summer 2022. The atmospheric samples were augmented with a ground-based rainfall collection targeting isotopic signatures of deep convection overshooting. Our GASP samples yielded mostly negligible amounts of both 10Be and 7Be collected in the mid-stratosphere but led to design improvements to increase aerosol capture in low-pressure environments. Observations from FiSH and the precipitation collection were more fruitful. FiSH showed the presence of turbulent velocity, temperature, and acoustic fluctuations in the stratosphere, including length scales in the infra-sonic range and inertial subrange that indicated times of elevated turbulence. The precipitation collection, and subsequent statistical analysis, showed that large spatial datasets of 10Be/7Be can be measured in individual rainfall events with minimum terrestrial contamination. While the spatial patterns in rainfall suggested some evidence for overshooting convection, inter-event temporal variability was clearly observed and predicted with good agreement using the 3D chemical transport model GEOS-CHEM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Atmospheric Techniques, Instruments, and Modeling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of berylium-7 and -10 production and wet deposition as well as estimated ratios of 10Be/7Be in the stratosphere and troposphere. Our airborne (GASP) and ground-based wet deposition (Raincube) aerosol collection methods are also illustrated. Figure modified from [<a href="#B17-atmosphere-15-01502" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) External view of FiSH showing the cold- and hot-wire anemometers and tail fin; (<b>b</b>) internal view of FiSH showing the onboard electronics; (<b>c</b>) schematic of the single-balloon configuration with the FiSH payload; (<b>d</b>) photograph of FiSH launched during BIRDIES.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) GASP external and internal views; (<b>b</b>) close–up view of GASP’s interior showing the onboard electronics, pump, and filter system; (<b>c</b>) schematic of the tandem-balloon configuration with GASP; (<b>d</b>) photograph of GASP launched during BIRDIES.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic of major pre-flight, flight, and post-flight activities for BIRDIES. These steps are for both the single- and tandem-balloon platforms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Photograph of the Raincube at E36 which shows a typical deployment during BIRDIES; (<b>b</b>) Raincube deployment map (blue stars) in the DOE ARM SGP domain centered on the Central Facility; (<b>c</b>) regional map showing central Oklahoma and Kansas and the locations of the Salina airport (SAL) and the ARM Central Facility (CF) Raincubes (as well as the boundaries of the ARM Raincube domain), and the IMS station RN74.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic of the Accelerated Mass Spectrometry (AMS) analytical procedure for 10Be and 7Be including the sample preparation for the precipitation (Raincube) samples and aerosol (GASP filter) samples. Also shown are the split samples for anion, cation, and isotopes of H and O analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>One-hour precipitation amounts measured at three of the ARM sites (E32, I10, CF) to show that some events contained more than one storm system during the collection duration. The sample collection events are labeled and highlighted in gray. Collection durations differ between sites because the collection was performed manually. Event 1 is not shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Example of (<b>a</b>) flight trajectory and (<b>b</b>) altitude information, shown for BIRDIES-05a (GASP), BIRDIES-05b (FiSH payload), and BIRDIES-07 (GASP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>BIRDIES-05b (<b>a</b>) hot-wire, (<b>b</b>) cold-wire, and (<b>c</b>) microphone power spectrum from FiSH shown for three altitudes in the lower-mid-stratosphere.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>FiSH measurements of (<b>a</b>) Brunt–Väisälä frequency, (<b>b</b>) wind shear, and (<b>c</b>) Richardson number on the ascent phase from BIRDIES-05b. Altitudes plotted range from 10 to 26 km (upper troposphere to mid-stratosphere). Dashed line is the critical Richardson number, <span class="html-italic">Ri<sub>crit</sub></span> = 0.25.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Measured mean (+/− one standard deviation) and modeled concentrations of 10Be, 7Be, and their ratio (10Be/7Be) by event number. Each measured event contains up to 11 ARM SGP Raincube observations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Time series of daily 7Be measured at the IMS RN74 station in Ashland, Kansas; (<b>b</b>) difference between GEOS-Chem modeled and observed value; and (<b>c</b>) difference focused on the BIRDIES period with the collection Events 2-6 highlighted. Note in panel (<b>c</b>) that the collection durations of Events 3 and 4 overlap with the daily IMS record as indicated by bracketed lines. Average concurrent BIRDIES precipitation collection events are highlighted in (<b>c</b>). The dashed box in (<b>b</b>) represents the BIRDIES period shown in detail in panel (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients (R) for a subset of the analyzed chemical species in the BIRDIES precipitation dataset. Precipitation is event– and site-specific and is the value measured by the rain gauge. Precipitation weight is the amount of water in each sample received at the laboratory.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Agglomerative clustering with a median linkage function applied to the BIRDIES precipitation dataset. The colors represent the z-score, where the standard deviation from the median is calculated by column. The clustering shows three main groups (Clusters A–C).</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 9292 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Ice Accretion on the Thermodynamic Performance of a Scientific Balloon: A Simulation Study
by Qiang Liu, Lan He, Yanchu Yang, Kaibin Zhao, Tao Li, Rongchen Zhu and Yanqing Wang
Aerospace 2024, 11(11), 899; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11110899 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 584
Abstract
A scientific balloon is the ideal platform for carrying out long-duration missions for scientific research in the stratosphere. However, when a scientific balloon ascends through icy clouds and reaches supercooled droplets, there is a risk of ice accretion on the balloon’s surface. Ice [...] Read more.
A scientific balloon is the ideal platform for carrying out long-duration missions for scientific research in the stratosphere. However, when a scientific balloon ascends through icy clouds and reaches supercooled droplets, there is a risk of ice accretion on the balloon’s surface. Ice accretion on the balloon can threaten flight safety and the accomplishment of missions and can even result in disastrous accidents. A comprehensive simulation platform was developed to simulate the influence of ice accretion on the thermodynamic performance of a scientific balloon to provide quantitative data support for balloon design and flight operations. The simulation platform consisted of two parts: one based on ANSYS software to solve the accretion model and the other a program developed with MATLAB software to solve the thermodynamic model. The results suggest that, in certain cloud environments, there is a risk of ice accretion on a balloon’s surface; the extra ice mass added to the balloon may prevent it from ascending through icy clouds and instead keep it floating at the base of these clouds. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aerospace Anti-icing Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Cloud environment around a scientific balloon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relationship between the three ice accretion modules.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Thermal environment of a scientific balloon in a cloud.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mechanical analysis of balloon pressure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Flow chart of the simulation platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Data flow of the ice accretion analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Three-dimensional computational domain and boundary conditions of a scientific balloon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cross-sectional mesh of computational domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Structure of the thermodynamic simulation program.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Distribution of temperature sensors inside the balloon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Ascending state of the balloon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Floating state of the balloon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Flight altitude data comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Ascent velocity data comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Helium temperature data comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Temperature distribution of balloon surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Static pressure distribution on the balloon’s surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Droplet collection efficiency distribution on the balloon’s surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Ice accretion distribution on the balloon’s surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Total ice accretion mass.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Flight altitude performance with the influence of ice accretion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Ascent velocity performance under the influence of ice accretion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Helium temperature performance under the influence of ice accretion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Helium pressure performance under the influence of ice accretion.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 1307 KiB  
Article
Station-Keeping Control of Stratospheric Balloons Based on Simultaneous Optimistic Optimization in Dynamic Wind
by Yuanqiao Fan, Xiaolong Deng, Xixiang Yang, Yuan Long and Fangchao Bai
Electronics 2024, 13(20), 4032; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13204032 - 13 Oct 2024
Viewed by 808
Abstract
Stratospheric balloons serve as cost-effective platforms for wireless communication. However, these platforms encounter challenges stemming from their underactuation in the horizontal plane. Consequently, controllers must continually identify favorable wind conditions to optimize station-keeping performance while managing energy consumption. This study presents a receding [...] Read more.
Stratospheric balloons serve as cost-effective platforms for wireless communication. However, these platforms encounter challenges stemming from their underactuation in the horizontal plane. Consequently, controllers must continually identify favorable wind conditions to optimize station-keeping performance while managing energy consumption. This study presents a receding horizon controller based on wind and balloon models. Two neural networks, PredRNN and ResNet, are utilized for short-term wind field forecast. Additionally, an online receding horizon controller, based on simultaneous optimistic optimization (SOO), is developed for action sequence planning and adapted to accommodate various constraints, which is especially suitable due to its gradient-free nature, high efficiency, and effectiveness in black-box function optimization. A reward function is formulated to balance power consumption and station-keeping performance. Simulations conducted across diverse positions and dates demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method compared with traditional greedy and A* algorithms. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Architecture of PredRNN [<a href="#B20-electronics-13-04032" class="html-bibr">20</a>]. Orange arrows denote spatiotemporal memory flow <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="script">M</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>l</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="script">H</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>l</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math>, black arrows indicate hidden information flow <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="script">C</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>l</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="script">H</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>l</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math>, and blue arrows represent the addition of forecast residual to the current wind field. The addition decoupling loss is employed to maximize the orthogonality of the memory flow and hidden information flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>ResNet architecture. The input goes through two paths. The first path uses residual block to extract features, and the second path uses diff, which directly provides the “momentum” features and enhances the performance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Geographical regions and durations used in the training dataset. Region 1 spans 30° N–45° N, 90° E–120° E, and Region 2 spans 0° N–30° N, 105° E–125° E.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Wind forecasting error <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mo>−</mo> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mi> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> of PredRNN, ResNet and persistence model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Illustration of the optimistic optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Optimized trajectory generated by SOOP in a true wind field with varying expansion times. The right figure represents <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>V</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>)</mo> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> and the distance to the station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Launch at position 1 with constraints for 1 day.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Launch at position 2 with constraints for 1 day.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>True wind distribution and forecast at position 2. (<b>a</b>) True wind distribution and forecast (generated at 8:00) at 9:00. Cross marker is the true position at 9:00. Blue square is the restricted area. (<b>b</b>) True wind distribution and forecast (generated at 8:00) at 10:00. Cross marker is the true position at 10:00.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Average distance to the station over 3 days for two positions and five launch dates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Trajectory and SOC of balloon launched at position 2 on 22 March 2023 for a 3-day period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Trajectory and SOC of balloon launched at position 1 on 7 August 2023 for a 3-day period.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 4351 KiB  
Article
Aerostat-Based Observation of Space Objects in the Stratosphere
by Jiang Wang, Ming Shen, Qin Wen, Rong Zhao, Zhanchao Wang, Pengqi Gao and Min Huang
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 5175; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14125175 - 14 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1220
Abstract
For the requirements of the multi-means observation and emergency monitoring of space objects, including space debris and near-earth asteroids, this paper analyzes the astronomical observation conditions in the stratosphere, which is the region of the earth’s atmosphere between 18 km and 55 km [...] Read more.
For the requirements of the multi-means observation and emergency monitoring of space objects, including space debris and near-earth asteroids, this paper analyzes the astronomical observation conditions in the stratosphere, which is the region of the earth’s atmosphere between 18 km and 55 km of altitude. The results reveal that near space has a significantly superior sky background and observation environment than ground-based observation, with the values of transmittance in the visible band and near-infrared bands more than 0.91 and 0.988, respectively. The sky background radiance at 20 km is 2.5% of the ground in the visible band and near-infrared band, which is practical for daytime observation, and there is an advantage in the availability of observable hours without the influence of aerosols and turbulence, etc. Based on near-space aerostats, such as a high-altitude balloon, a new method of space object floating observation has been proposed, including the observation facilities and scheme. The simulation shows that it has an all-weather/all-day ability while adopting multi-band observation. Applying a telescope with 9.5 mag detective ability located on the aerostat, debris with the size of about 0.36 m can be observed at a 1000 km distance and phase angle of 100°, while the near-earth asteroid with the size of about 980 km can be observed at a 5 million km distance and phase angle of 40° during the daytime. With these advantages, the aerostat-based observation would be a beneficial supplement to the ground-based observation network. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spectral Detection: Technologies and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Atmospheric transmittance in visible and near-infrared bands with zenith distances of 0°, 30°, and 60° at the station La Paranal of the European Southern Observatory.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The calculated value of atmospheric transmittance of visible and near-infrared bands at 20 km of altitude in Beijing. (<b>a</b>) 500 nm~800 nm; (<b>b</b>) 900 nm~1700 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The magnitude of the sky background in visible and near-infrared bands on the ground and in the stratosphere (20 km) at 02:00:00 (UTC) around the summer solstice with LOWTRAN parameters: the visibility is set to 23 km; the sun is located at the azimuth of 109°; and the attitude is 56°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Vertical distribution of the aerosol quantity density and mass concentration. Color bars indicate local standard time (from 22:00 UTC−24 day to 1:00 UTC), showing the observation period of POPS from rise to fall. The dashed line indicates the troposphere top calculated from the radio probe measurements. Data source: [<a href="#B10-applsci-14-05175" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Atmospheric humidity as measured in situ by a meteorological balloon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Composition of space object floating observation system (SOFOS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Experiment pod in near space.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The observation ability in the visible band of the telescopes with different apertures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The detection ability of telescopes with different focal lengths in the infrared band.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Observation ability for space debris by means of the SOFOS during the daytime. The contour number indicates that the object size that the unit is m. (<b>a</b>) Observation ability of 7.0 mag. (<b>b</b>) Observation ability of 9.5 mag.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Observation ability for NEA by means of the SOFOS during the daytime.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 9997 KiB  
Article
System for Analysis of Wind Collocations (SAWC): A Novel Archive and Collocation Software Application for the Intercomparison of Winds from Multiple Observing Platforms
by Katherine E. Lukens, Kevin Garrett, Kayo Ide, David Santek, Brett Hoover, David Huber, Ross N. Hoffman and Hui Liu
Meteorology 2024, 3(1), 114-140; https://doi.org/10.3390/meteorology3010006 - 7 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1459
Abstract
Accurate atmospheric 3D wind observations are one of the top priorities for the global scientific community. To address this requirement, and to support researchers’ needs to acquire and analyze wind data from multiple sources, the System for Analysis of Wind Collocations (SAWC) was [...] Read more.
Accurate atmospheric 3D wind observations are one of the top priorities for the global scientific community. To address this requirement, and to support researchers’ needs to acquire and analyze wind data from multiple sources, the System for Analysis of Wind Collocations (SAWC) was jointly developed by NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, UMD/ESSIC/CISESS, and UW-Madison/CIMSS. SAWC encompasses the following: a multi-year archive of global 3D winds observed by Aeolus, sondes, aircraft, stratospheric superpressure balloons, and satellite-derived atmospheric motion vectors, archived and uniformly formatted in netCDF for public consumption; identified pairings between select datasets collocated in space and time; and a downloadable software application developed for users to interactively collocate and statistically compare wind observations based on their research needs. The utility of SAWC is demonstrated by conducting a one-year (September 2019–August 2020) evaluation of Aeolus level-2B (L2B) winds (Baseline 11 L2B processor version). Observations from four archived conventional wind datasets are collocated with Aeolus. The recommended quality controls are applied. Wind comparisons are assessed using the SAWC collocation application. Comparison statistics are stratified by season, geographic region, and Aeolus observing mode. The results highlight the value of SAWC’s capabilities, from product validation through intercomparison studies to the evaluation of data usage in applications and advances in the global Earth observing architecture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Early Career Scientists' (ECS) Contributions to Meteorology (2023))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart illustrating SAWC’s end-to-end process. Note that the user interfaces with the collocation and plotting tools in Steps (2) and (3), respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Observation number density maps on a latitude–longitude plane (left, (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>)) and height–latitude plane (right, (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>)) for QC’d Aeolus winds from the (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Rayleigh-clear regime and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Mie-cloudy regime for September 2019–August 2020, prior to collocation with the Dependent datasets. The colors indicate the number density per grid cell, with dimensions of 1° × 1° for panels (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and 1 km × 1° for panels (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Observation number densities collapsed onto the latitude–longitude plane (left column) and onto the height/pressure–latitude plane (right column) for (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) aircraft winds, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) AMVs, (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) sonde winds, and (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) Loon winds, all collocated with Aeolus Rayleigh-clear winds for September 2019–August 2020. The colors indicate the number density per grid cell, with dimensions of 1° × 1° for panels (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>), 1 km × 1° for panel (<b>b</b>), and 25 hPa × 1° for panels (<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Density scatterplots of HLOS wind differences for RayClear (<b>a</b>) and MieCloud (<b>b</b>) comparisons with sondes for September 2019–August 2020. Statistics of the collocation are given in <a href="#meteorology-03-00006-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>. The colors indicate the number density per 1 m/s × 1 m/s cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Time series of Mean_Diffs (m/s, (<b>a</b>)), correlation coefficients (r, (<b>b</b>)), RMSD and SD_Diffs (m/s, (<b>c</b>)), and collocation counts (<b>d</b>) for RayClear comparisons during September 2019–August 2020. Statistics of the collocation are given in <a href="#meteorology-03-00006-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>. The colors denote each Dependent wind dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Vertical profiles of Mean_Diffs (solid lines) and SD_Diffs (dotted lines) per height/pressure level (left, (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>)) and corresponding collocation counts (1e5, right, (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>)) comparing the Dependent datasets (colors) with Aeolus RayClear (top, (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>)) and MieCloud (bottom, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>)) winds for the NH during September 2019–August 2020. The solid dots indicate statistically significant Mean_Diffs at the 95% level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mean_Diffs (solid lines), SD_Diffs (dotted lines), SDs of the Driver (dash–dot lines), and SDs of the Dependent datasets (dotted lines) (left, (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>)) and corresponding collocations counts (1e5, right, (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>)) as a function of the Driver wind speed (binned by 10 m/s) comparing the Dependent datasets (colors) with Aeolus RayClear (top, (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>)) and MieCloud (bottom, (<b>c</b>,<b>b</b>)) winds for the NH during September 2019–August 2020. The solid dots indicate statistically significant Mean_Diffs at the 95% level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Density scatterplots of HLOS wind differences for RayClear (<b>a</b>) and MieCloud (<b>b</b>) as in <a href="#meteorology-03-00006-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a> but comparing Aeolus with IR AMVs. The statistics of the collocation are given in <a href="#meteorology-03-00006-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Vertical profiles of Mean_Diffs (solid lines) and SD_Diffs (dotted lines) per height/pressure level (top, (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>)) and corresponding collocations counts (1e4, bottom, (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>)) comparing the Dependent datasets (colors) with Aeolus RayClear winds for the SH (left, (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>)), Tropics (center, (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>)), and NH (right, (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>)) during September 2019–August 2020. The solid dots indicate statistically significant Mean_Diffs at the 95% level. Plotting conventions are the same as those in <a href="#meteorology-03-00006-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Vertical profiles of statistics comparing IR, visible, WVcloud, and WVclear AMVs with Aeolus MieCloud winds. Otherwise as in <a href="#meteorology-03-00006-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Height–latitude plots of aircraft vs. Aeolus RayClear SD_Diffs in m/s (left (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>)) and corresponding collocation counts (right (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>)) during September 2019–August 2020, stratified by 3-month seasons: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SON, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) DJF, (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) MAM, and (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) JJA. Each grid cell is 1 km × 1°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Global mean observation error variance estimates (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and corresponding collocation counts (1e6, (<b>c</b>)) vs. Driver wind speed binned by 10 m/s comparing the Dependent datasets (colors) with Aeolus MieCloud winds during September 2019–August 2020. For variance estimates: Error variance of the Driver (dash–dot lines) using observation error values from the data producers, error variance of the Dependent datasets (dotted lines) using observation errors that are used as input in NOAA operations, total variance that equals the Driver variance plus the Dependent variance (solid lines), and the square of the mean wind difference (Dependent–Driver) computed in SAWC (dashed lines). In (<b>a</b>), Dependent observation errors in each dataset are set to a single value for all winds: Aircraft = 3.0 m/s, Sonde = 3.0 m/s, AMV = 10 m/s. In (<b>b</b>), aircraft and sonde errors are the same as in (<b>a</b>), but the AMV observation error is set to a range of vertically varying values from 3.8 m/s at pressures &gt;1000 hPa to 7.0 m/s at pressures &lt;250 hPa, and represents the median range of input observation errors used for each satellite in NOAA operations.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 5990 KiB  
Article
Technology Demonstration of Space Situational Awareness (SSA) Mission on Stratospheric Balloon Platform
by Randa Qashoa, Vithurshan Suthakar, Gabriel Chianelli, Perushan Kunalakantha and Regina S. K. Lee
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(5), 749; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16050749 - 21 Feb 2024
Viewed by 2896
Abstract
As the number of resident space objects (RSOs) orbiting Earth increases, the risk of collision increases, and mitigating this risk requires the detection, identification, characterization, and tracking of as many RSOs as possible in view at any given time, an area of research [...] Read more.
As the number of resident space objects (RSOs) orbiting Earth increases, the risk of collision increases, and mitigating this risk requires the detection, identification, characterization, and tracking of as many RSOs as possible in view at any given time, an area of research referred to as Space Situational Awareness (SSA). In order to develop algorithms for RSO detection and characterization, starfield images containing RSOs are needed. Such images can be obtained from star trackers, which have traditionally been used for attitude determination. Despite their low resolution, star tracker images have the potential to be useful for SSA. Using star trackers in this dual-purpose manner offers the benefit of leveraging existing star tracker technology already in orbit, eliminating the need for new and costly equipment to be launched into space. In August 2022, we launched a CubeSat-class payload, Resident Space Object Near-space Astrometric Research (RSONAR), on a stratospheric balloon. The primary objective of the payload was to demonstrate a dual-purpose star tracker for imaging and analyzing RSOs from a space-like environment, aiding in the field of SSA. Building on the experience and lessons learned from the 2022 campaign, we developed a next-generation dual-purpose camera in a 4U-inspired CubeSat platform, named RSONAR II. This payload was successfully launched in August 2023. With the RSONAR II payload, we developed a real-time, multi-purpose imaging system with two main cameras of varying cost that can adjust imaging parameters in real-time to evaluate the effectiveness of each configuration for RSO imaging. We also performed onboard RSO detection and attitude determination to verify the performance of our algorithms. Additionally, we implemented a downlink capability to verify payload performance during flight. To add a wider variety of images for testing our algorithms, we altered the resolution of one of the cameras throughout the mission. In this paper, we demonstrate a dual-purpose star tracker system for future SSA missions and compare two different sensor options for RSO imaging. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Satellite Missions for Earth and Planetary Exploration)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Star tracker prototype launched on a stratospheric balloon in 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>RSONAR II Model; (<b>a</b>) RSONAR II CAD Model, (<b>b</b>) RSONAR II payload integrated on the gondola.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>RSONAR II harness diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Example of a sequence of PCO camera images captured from a field campaign. The red circle shows the location of the RSO as it transits. These images have been enhanced with the use of the Zscale algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Block diagram outlining the closed-loop image acquisition application once the payload is powered on.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Software block diagram of the STARDUST payload.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sample downlinked image enhanced with the Zscale algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>An illustration of the RSO detection algorithm’s processing steps, taking the lit pixels corresponding to RSOs in 3 different images and associating them together into a detection. The red, green, and blue pixels represent the centroids of the RSO from the first, second, and third image, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The distribution of time delays between images during high-resolution 2048 × 2048 imaging, with the frequency of occurrences on the <span class="html-italic">Y</span>-axis and the time difference in milliseconds on the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis. The mode (460 ms), median (470 ms), and mean (593.28 ms) are indicated by the red dashed, green solid, and orange dash-dotted lines, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The graph illustrates temperature fluctuations of various components during the mission flight on 22 August 2023, from 4:52 a.m. to 9:34 a.m. (UTC). Notably, both the payload and the environment experienced significant temperature changes in the initial two hours. Subsequently, the temperature of all components stabilized as the flight coasted at the targeted altitudes, with only minor temperature fluctuations observed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plot of limiting magnitude over integration time for RSONAR II sensors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The histogram displays the frequency of stars detected at different magnitudes (brightness levels) in the Johnson V (visual) band, with two datasets represented: subpayload 1 in blue and subpayload 2 in red. The x-axis represents the magnitude (Johnson V), a logarithmic scale used to measure the brightness of stars, while the y-axis indicates the frequency of stars at the detection’s magnitude ranges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Subpayload 1 and (<b>b</b>) subpayload 2 display parts of the Pisces constellation captured by subpayloads 1 and 2, respectively, towards the end of their operational period during flight.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Contrast maps for (<b>a</b>) subpayload 1 and (<b>b</b>) subpayload 2 capturing the same starfield, which reveal the variations in local contrast across each sensor’s image. Brighter squares indicate areas of higher contrast, likely corresponding to celestial bodies, against the darker background of space.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Two histograms are presented, each in log scale, representing the distribution of pixel intensities from the minimum to maximum pixel values in the images: (<b>a</b>) a 16-bit image from subpayload 1, and (<b>b</b>) an 8-bit image from subpayload 2, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The Life Cycle of Celestial Objects Pts. 1 &amp; 2: (<b>a</b>) RSONAR II payload display; (<b>b</b>) some of the etched messages seen through magnifying glass.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5035 KiB  
Article
A Dual-Purpose Camera for Attitude Determination and Resident Space Object Detection on a Stratospheric Balloon
by Gabriel Chianelli, Perushan Kunalakantha, Marissa Myhre and Regina S. K. Lee
Sensors 2024, 24(1), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010071 - 22 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2101
Abstract
Space systems play an integral role in every facet of our daily lives, including national security, communications, and resource management. Therefore, it is critical to protect our valuable assets in space and build resiliency in the space environment. In recent years, we have [...] Read more.
Space systems play an integral role in every facet of our daily lives, including national security, communications, and resource management. Therefore, it is critical to protect our valuable assets in space and build resiliency in the space environment. In recent years, we have developed a novel approach to Space Situational Awareness (SSA), in the form of a low-resolution, Wide Field-of-View (WFOV) camera payload for attitude determination and Resident Space Object (RSO) detection. Detection is the first step in tracking, identification, and characterization of RSOs, including natural and artificial objects orbiting the Earth. A space-based dual-purpose camera that can provide attitude information alongside RSO detection can enhance the current SSA technologies which rely on ground infrastructure. A CubeSat form factor payload with real-time attitude determination and RSO detection algorithms was developed and flown onboard the CSA/CNES stratospheric balloon platform in August 2023. Sub-degree pointing information and multiple RSO detections were demonstrated during operation, with opportunities for improvement discussed. This paper outlines the hardware and software architecture, system design methodology, on-ground testing, and in-flight results of the dual-purpose camera payload. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends on Sensor Devices for Space and Defense Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Star tracker payload on 2022 STRATOS Balloon Platform (<b>a</b>), and 2023 STRATOS Balloon Platform (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>IDS UI-3370CP-M-GL camera (<b>a</b>), and Raspberry Pi 4 Model B OBC (<b>b</b>) used on STARDUST.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Software block diagram for STARDUST, visually outlining the functions and logic.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Block diagram outlining the first step, extracting centroids, in the RSO detection algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Block diagram outlining the second step, detecting RSOs, in the RSO detection algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Processed starfield image with an RSO captured during the STRATOS 2023 campaign.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Attitude pointing Yaw, Pitch, and Roll errors for the LIS algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Attitude pointing Yaw, Pitch, and Roll errors for the tracking mode algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>RSO centroids corresponding to three sequential images, plotted as single, colored pixels on a black background. The Euclidean distances calculated by the algorithm are also plotted.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 10991 KiB  
Review
Use of Silicon Photomultipliers in the Detectors of the JEM-EUSO Program
by Francesca Bisconti
Instruments 2023, 7(4), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments7040055 - 14 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1863
Abstract
The JEM-EUSO program aims to study ultra-high energy cosmic rays from space. To achieve this goal, it has realized a series of experiments installed on the ground (EUSO-TA), various on stratospheric balloons (with the most recent one EUSO-SPB2), and inside the International Space [...] Read more.
The JEM-EUSO program aims to study ultra-high energy cosmic rays from space. To achieve this goal, it has realized a series of experiments installed on the ground (EUSO-TA), various on stratospheric balloons (with the most recent one EUSO-SPB2), and inside the International Space Station (Mini-EUSO), in light of future missions such as K-EUSO and POEMMA. At nighttime, these instruments aim to monitor the Earth’s atmosphere measuring fluorescence and Cherenkov light produced by extensive air showers generated both by very high-energy cosmic rays from outside the atmosphere and by neutrino decays. As the two light components differ in duration (order of microseconds for fluorescence light and a few nanoseconds for Cherenkov light) they each require specialized sensors and acquisition electronics. So far, the sensors used for the fluorescence camera are the Multi-Anode Photomultiplier Tubes (MAPMTs), while for the Cherenkov one, new systems based on Silicon PhotoMultipliers (SiPMs) have been developed. In this contribution, a brief review of the experiments is followed by a discussion of the tests performed on the optical sensors. Particular attention is paid to the development, test, and calibration conducted on SiPMs, also in view to optimize the geometry, mass, and weight in light of the installation of mass-critical applications such as balloon- and space-borne instrumentation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A PDM with the focal surface made of 36 MAPMTs (<b>left</b>), image taken from [<a href="#B17-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">17</a>]; 2 MAPMTs and a SiPM array of similar size and number of channels (<b>right</b>), composition of images taken from [<a href="#B18-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">18</a>] (MAPMTs) and adapted from Hamamatsu product information [<a href="#B15-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">15</a>] (SiPM array).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Fluorescence spectrum of nitrogen relaxation in the UV band from 280 nm to 435 nm at 800 hPa (about 2 km) measured by the AIRFLY Collaboration, taken from Ref. [<a href="#B24-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">24</a>]. The area is scaled to unity. This shows that 25% of the spectrum intensity is due to the main line at 337.1 nm. PDEs of MAPMTs (calculated as the quantum efficiency present on the product datasheet and the collection efficiency of 80%, see the text) and SiPM arrays taken from Hamamatsu product information [<a href="#B14-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">14</a>,<a href="#B15-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B27-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. Image taken from Ref. [<a href="#B28-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Images for the EUSO-SPB1 experiment. Sketch of the gondola with the PDM and an indication of the SiECA position (<b>top-left</b>). Pictures of EUSO-SPB1 before the launch (<b>top-right</b>,<b>bottom</b>). Images at the top taken from Ref. [<a href="#B31-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">31</a>] and image at the bottom taken from Ref. [<a href="#B10-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The SiECA camera (<b>left</b>); The SiECA camera assembled next to the EUSO-SPB1 PDM (with the noise-influenced EC of the PDM highlighted in red) (<b>right</b>). Images taken from Ref. [<a href="#B35-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Simulation and measurement in the laboratory of the SiECA response. Simulation of a proton event of energy <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>1.1</mn> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>19</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> eV and zenith angle 22.31° detected by both SiECA and the PDM (<b>left</b>). The signal has been integrated over 41 GTUs and no background is added to the plot. Image taken from Ref. [<a href="#B37-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">37</a>]. Full camera test with non-uniform light source. The response is the average photons detected per GTU (<b>right</b>). Image taken from Ref. [<a href="#B35-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">35</a>]. Gaps between the MAPMTs of the PDM and between the SiPM arrays of SiECA are neglected in both images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>EUSO-SPB1 altitude with SiECA operation periods indicated in green circles. Descents indicate night cold cycles, then rising with the heat from the Sun. Image taken from Ref. [<a href="#B35-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Images for the EUSO-SPB2 experiment. Sketch of the gondola with the fluorescence (<b>left in the sketch</b>) and the Cherenkov (<b>right in the sketch</b>) detectors (<b>top-left</b>). Pictures of EUSO-SPB2 before the launch (<b>top-right</b>,<b>bottom</b>). Images taken from Refs. [<a href="#B39-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">39</a>,<a href="#B40-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">40</a>,<a href="#B41-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">41</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Half assembled Cherenkov camera of EUSO-SPB2 (Lego figures for scale). Image taken from Ref. [<a href="#B41-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">41</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Camera event display of a simulated air-shower event (<b>top</b>) and accidental-triggered event (<b>bottom</b>). Values on the x and y axes are for pixels, and on the color scale are for counts. Image taken from Ref. [<a href="#B41-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">41</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Pictures of Mini-EUSO onboard the ISS. Mini-EUSO in the hand of a cosmonaut (<b>left</b>) and connected to the UV-transparent window of the Zvezda module (<b>right</b>). Images taken from Ref. [<a href="#B12-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">12</a>] (© AAS. Reproduced with permission).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The Mini-EUSO focal surface. The main camera is the PDM with 36 MAPMTs. On top of the PDM there is a 64-channel SiPM array, at the bottom of the PDM there are two UV-light sensors and a single-pixel SiPM. Image adapted from Ref. [<a href="#B12-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">12</a>] (© AAS. Reproduced with permission).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Measurements of the ML8511 UV sensor as a function of time. Mini-EUSO operates at nighttime when the sensor measures a value below 60 ADC counts. To avoid fluctuations at the day–night terminator line, 2 thresholds are used to determine the transition from day to night (60 ADC counts, blue line) and vice-versa (100 ADC counts, orange line). Image taken from [<a href="#B12-instruments-07-00055" class="html-bibr">12</a>] (© AAS. Reproduced with permission).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 680 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Resident Space Object (RSO) Detection Methods
by Vithurshan Suthakar, Aiden Alexander Sanvido, Randa Qashoa and Regina S. K. Lee
Sensors 2023, 23(24), 9668; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23249668 - 7 Dec 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3008
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in satellite launches, resulting in a proliferation of satellites in our near-Earth space environment. This surge has led to a multitude of resident space objects (RSOs). Thus, detecting RSOs is a crucial element of [...] Read more.
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in satellite launches, resulting in a proliferation of satellites in our near-Earth space environment. This surge has led to a multitude of resident space objects (RSOs). Thus, detecting RSOs is a crucial element of monitoring these objects and plays an important role in preventing collisions between them. Optical images captured from spacecraft and with ground-based telescopes provide valuable information for RSO detection and identification, thereby enhancing space situational awareness (SSA). However, datasets are not publicly available due to their sensitive nature. This scarcity of data has hindered the development of detection algorithms. In this paper, we present annotated RSO images, which constitute an internally curated dataset obtained from a low-resolution wide-field-of-view imager on a stratospheric balloon. In addition, we examine several frame differencing techniques, namely, adjacent frame differencing, median frame differencing, proximity filtering and tracking, and a streak detection method. These algorithms were applied to annotated images to detect RSOs. The proposed algorithms achieved a competitive degree of success with precision scores of 73%, 95%, 95%, and 100% and F1 scores of 68%, 77%, 82%, and 79%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensing for Space Applications (Volume II))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow diagram of adjacent frame differencing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Visualization of AFD processing: (<b>a</b>) current frame, (<b>b</b>) subsequent frame, and (<b>c</b>) differenced frame; the RSOs are highlighted with a green bounding box, and visual artifacts that are to be filtered are highlighted with red boxes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flow diagram of median frame differencing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Various frames used in MFD processing: (<b>a</b>) the current frame, (<b>b</b>) median frame, and (<b>c</b>) differenced frame, in which the visual distinction between RSOs and stars can be observed. RSOs maintain their shapes and are highlighted with green bounding boxes, whereas stars and artifacts, which display irregular shapes, are contained within red bounding boxes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Flow diagram of proximity filtering and tracking.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Various frames used in PFT processing: (<b>a</b>) the median frame, where all contours present within the images are highlighted with red bounding circles, and (<b>b</b>) the current frame, where an RSO is tracked with a unique ID and enclosed in a green bounding box.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Before star removal and after star removal; the pixel intensity scales are displayed as follows: (<b>a</b>) the original image before star removal, where the red dots indicate stars with high pixel values; (<b>b</b>) the same image after the stars were removed, with black dots indicating regions where stars were previously present, corresponding to the red dots from (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flow diagram of streak detection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>All detected streaks are highlighted with green bounding boxes: (<b>a</b>) first sequence, (<b>b</b>) second sequence, and (<b>c</b>) third sequence. The figures were enhanced using the ZScale algorithm to provide visual clarity.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 20688 KiB  
Article
Data Downloaded via Parachute from a NASA Super-Pressure Balloon
by Ellen L. Sirks, Richard Massey, Ajay S. Gill, Jason Anderson, Steven J. Benton, Anthony M. Brown, Paul Clark, Joshua English, Spencer W. Everett, Aurelien A. Fraisse, Hugo Franco, John W. Hartley, David Harvey, Bradley Holder, Andrew Hunter, Eric M. Huff, Andrew Hynous, Mathilde Jauzac, William C. Jones, Nikky Joyce, Duncan Kennedy, David Lagattuta, Jason S.-Y. Leung, Lun Li, Stephen Lishman, Thuy Vy T. Luu, Jacqueline E. McCleary, Johanna M. Nagy, C. Barth Netterfield, Emaad Paracha, Robert Purcaru, Susan F. Redmond, Jason D. Rhodes, Andrew Robertson, L. Javier Romualdez, Sarah Roth, Robert Salter, Jürgen Schmoll, Mohamed M. Shaaban, Roger Smith, Russell Smith, Sut Ieng Tam and Georgios N. Vassilakisadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Aerospace 2023, 10(11), 960; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10110960 - 14 Nov 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 31908
Abstract
In April 2023, the superBIT telescope was lifted to the Earth’s stratosphere by a helium-filled super-pressure balloon to acquire astronomical imaging from above (99.5% of) the Earth’s atmosphere. It was launched from New Zealand and then, for 40 days, circumnavigated the globe five [...] Read more.
In April 2023, the superBIT telescope was lifted to the Earth’s stratosphere by a helium-filled super-pressure balloon to acquire astronomical imaging from above (99.5% of) the Earth’s atmosphere. It was launched from New Zealand and then, for 40 days, circumnavigated the globe five times at a latitude 40 to 50 degrees south. Attached to the telescope were four “drs” (Data Recovery System) capsules containing 5 TB solid state data storage, plus a gnss receiver, Iridium transmitter, and parachute. Data from the telescope were copied to these, and two were dropped over Argentina. They drifted 61 km horizontally while they descended 32 km, but we predicted their descent vectors within 2.4 km: in this location, the discrepancy appears irreducible below ∼2 km because of high speed, gusty winds and local topography. The capsules then reported their own locations within a few metres. We recovered the capsules and successfully retrieved all of superBIT’s data despite the telescope itself being later destroyed on landing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Space Telescopes & Payloads)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The <span class="html-small-caps">drs</span> is based around this custom <span class="html-small-caps">pcb</span> with a Raspberry Pi in the middle. An Ethernet cable is plugged into the bottom right of the Pi and attaches to a zero-extraction force connector at the top right corner of the <span class="html-small-caps">pcb</span>. Two <span class="html-small-caps">sd</span> card readers are plugged directly into the Pi, and two are attached to <span class="html-small-caps">usb</span> extension cables to reduce heat production at the sockets. Servo-operated pincer mechanisms can be seen on the right, with the pincer on the front holding on to the main gondola and the release at the back holding the parachute.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The <span class="html-small-caps">drs</span> capsules hang underneath the payload (here, down is shown to the left). They are prevented from swinging or rotating by a 3D-printed ‘alignment crown’ fixed to their top, which fits inside a mount on the gondola that has an inverted shape.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Thermal imaging of the top and bottom of a Raspberry Pi, during testing in a room temperature laboratory. Thermal emission is interpreted as temperature (red, white, green numbers), assuming emissivity <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.95</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) The main <span class="html-small-caps">cpu</span> is the hottest component while executing a simple Python script. Nothing is attached to the <span class="html-small-caps">usb</span> sockets in this image. (<b>b</b>) The underside of a Pi attached to a <span class="html-small-caps">drs</span>, oriented as in <a href="#aerospace-10-00960-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>. The heat sink and <span class="html-small-caps">sd</span> card containing the operating system are now cold at the top, but the <span class="html-small-caps">usb</span> sockets become hot during file transfer to <span class="html-small-caps">sd</span> cards in small readers mounted in the <span class="html-small-caps">usb</span> sockets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Self-reported <span class="html-small-caps">cpu</span> temperature of the Raspberry Pi on each <span class="html-small-caps">drs</span> during the <span class="html-small-caps">superBIT</span> mission for <span class="html-small-caps">drs1</span> (red), <span class="html-small-caps">drs2</span> (blue), and <span class="html-small-caps">drs5</span> (green). Temperature principally varied with the 45 diurnal cycles in 40 days (<span class="html-small-caps">superBIT</span> crossed the international date line 5 times), the length and extent of which varied with <span class="html-small-caps">superBIT</span>’s speed and latitude. The histogram on the right splits times by positive or negative solar elevation. Insets show temperature variations with increased temporal resolution, including, for illustration, the one occasion when <span class="html-small-caps">drs1</span> was left powered on for 30 min. Temperature measurements were only available when a <span class="html-small-caps">drs</span> was powered on, and horizontal lines merely show the last reported temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Close-up of a <span class="html-small-caps">drs</span> in flight configuration. The closed-cell foam shell surrounding the <span class="html-small-caps">drs</span> can be seen poking out below a skirt of aluminised Mylar. It is further protected on two sides by sheets of foam insulation also covered by aluminised Mylar. Cables are routed upwards on the mounting frame. (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-small-caps">superBIT</span> suspended on the launch crane. Four <span class="html-small-caps">drs</span> capsules can be seen at the bottom, each attached to a corner of the frame holding the solar panels. The blue and white object hanging between them is a ballast hopper. Throughout its mission, the telescope keeps its back (on the right in these photos) oriented towards the Sun.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Descent trajectories of <span class="html-small-caps">drs1</span> (yellow) and <span class="html-small-caps">drs2</span> (red) capsules, which were released over southern Argentina on 25 May 2023. Pins mark the known release and landing positions; everything else was modelled using the pyBalloon software [<a href="#B6-aerospace-10-00960" class="html-bibr">6</a>]. (<b>a</b>) View from altitude, looking north. Predicted descent trajectories, spanning 62 km horizontally and 32 km vertically. are shown, with vertical lines every 15 s for the first minute, then every 1 min. (<b>b</b>) Location of trajectory within Argentina. (<b>c</b>) Zoomed-in map view, comparing the true landing sites to the predicted <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> uncertainty ellipses. The background image was created with Google Earth, using data from SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO, and imagery from Landsat/Copernicus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Landing sites of the <span class="html-small-caps">drs</span> capsules in Argentina. (<b>a</b>) General terrain and the search and rescue team from the governor’s office of Santa Cruz Province. The bright-orange parachutes of <span class="html-small-caps">drs1</span> (<b>b</b>) and <span class="html-small-caps">drs2</span> (<b>c</b>) were visible from a distance. The white foam shell and release crown were finally also visible; the foam helped to insulate and waterproof <span class="html-small-caps">drs2</span> when it landed on snow.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3246 KiB  
Article
Stratospheric Night Sky Imaging Payload for Space Situational Awareness (SSA)
by Perushan Kunalakantha, Andrea Vallecillo Baires, Siddharth Dave, Ryan Clark, Gabriel Chianelli and Regina S. K. Lee
Sensors 2023, 23(14), 6595; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23146595 - 21 Jul 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2153
Abstract
Space situational awareness (SSA) refers to collecting, analyzing, and keeping track of detailed knowledge of resident space objects (RSOs) in the space environment. With the rapidly increasing number of objects in space, the need for SSA grows as well. Traditional methods rely heavily [...] Read more.
Space situational awareness (SSA) refers to collecting, analyzing, and keeping track of detailed knowledge of resident space objects (RSOs) in the space environment. With the rapidly increasing number of objects in space, the need for SSA grows as well. Traditional methods rely heavily on imaging RSOs from large, narrow field-of-view (FOV), ground-based telescopes. This research outlines the technology demonstration payload, Resident Space Object Near-space Astrometric Research (RSONAR)—a star tracker-like, wide FOV camera combined with commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware to image RSOs from the stratosphere, overcoming the disadvantages of ground-based observations. The hardware components and software algorithm are described and evaluated. The eligibility of the payload for SSA is proven by the image processing algorithms, which detect the RSOs in the images captured during flight and the survival of the COTS components in the near-space environment. The payload features a low-resolution, wide FOV camera coupled with a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA)-based platform that houses the altitude and time-based image capture algorithm. The newly developed payload in a 2U-CubeSat form factor was flown as a space-ready payload on the CSA/CNES stratospheric balloon research platform to carry out algorithm and functionality tests in August 2022. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Xilinx PYNQ-Z1 FPGA development board.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>RSONAR payload CAD model outlining the structure and some electronics within the payload from two views: (<b>a</b>) Isometric view; (<b>b</b>) Side view. Note that triangular prism-like segments are added to the pain 2U segment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>RSONAR payload fastened to the gondola. (<b>a</b>) CAD model depiction of the mounting scheme; (<b>b</b>) Actual integration of the payload to the gondola.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Block diagram outlining the autonomous algorithm used to power on the payload, check the altitude and time, and take images with pre-defined camera parameters corresponding to the mode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Diagram outlining the connections between the electronics in the RSONAR payload.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagram outlining the electrical components used on the power distribution unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Pictured in the foreground is a smaller balloon used to keep the attached gondola steady upon launch. In the background is the larger balloon being inflated to launch. The larger balloon expanded even further as it ascended into the stratosphere.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Example of an image created from stacking a sequence of images. Stars appear as bright dots (example contained in dashed red circle), while RSOs appear as streaks (example contained in dashed red box). Multiple streaks are visible in the image, corresponding to multiple RSOs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Plot of the temperatures inside the PCO camera at various locations (sCMOS sensor, camera, and power supply) for the duration that the payload was powered alongside the temperature of the environment for the duration of the flight. Temperature logging of the camera ended at 8:30 AM local time, while environmental temperature logging continued until 1:10 PM local time. This work is based on observations with the CNES temperature sensor under a balloon operated by CNES, within STRATO-SCIENCE 2022 and in the framework of the CNES/CSA Agreement.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 2871 KiB  
Communication
Energetic Electron Precipitation via Satellite and Balloon Observations: Their Role in Atmospheric Ionization
by Irina Mironova, Galina Bazilevskaya, Vladimir Makhmutov, Andrey Mironov and Nikita Bobrov
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(13), 3291; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133291 - 27 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1441
Abstract
Information about the energetic electron precipitation (EEP) from the radiation belt into the atmosphere is important for assessing the ozone variability and dynamics of the middle atmosphere during magnetospheric and geomagnetic disturbances. The accurate values of energetic electron fluxes depending on their energy [...] Read more.
Information about the energetic electron precipitation (EEP) from the radiation belt into the atmosphere is important for assessing the ozone variability and dynamics of the middle atmosphere during magnetospheric and geomagnetic disturbances. The accurate values of energetic electron fluxes depending on their energy range are one of the most important problems for calculating atmospheric ionization rates, which, in turn, are taken into account for estimating ozone depletion in chemistry–climate models. Despite the importance of these processes for the high latitudes of middle atmosphere, precipitation of energetic electrons is still insufficiently studied. In order to better understand EEP and related processes in the atmosphere, it is important to have many realistic observations of EEP in order to correctly characterize their spectra. Invading the atmosphere, precipitating energetic electrons, in the range from tens of keV to relativistic energies of more than 1 MeV, generate bremsstrahlung, which penetrates into the stratosphere and is recorded by detectors on balloons. However, these observations can be made only when the balloon is at stratospheric heights. Near-Earth satellites, such as the polar-orbiting operational environmental satellites (POES), are constantly registering precipitating electrons in the loss cone, but are moving too fast in space. Based on a comparison of the results of EEP measurements on balloons and onboard POES satellites in 2003, we propose a criterion that makes it possible to constantly monitor EEP ionization at stratospheric heights using observations on POES satellites. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>EEP duration observed by POES and balloon measurements. Red—balloon EEP duration; blue—MEPED POES spacecraft EEP duration. Line shows daily fluence of &gt;2 MeV electrons in the outer radiation belt.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Examples of selected EEP energy spectra. Red—balloon EEP energy spectra; blue—MEPED POES spacecraft EEP energy spectra. Symbols set for the eye guide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Satellite and balloon power law spectra parameters (described by Equation (<a href="#FD1-remotesensing-15-03291" class="html-disp-formula">1</a>)) for all balloon observations in 2003. Red—balloon spectra parameters <span class="html-italic">A</span> and <span class="html-italic">k</span>; blue—MEPED POES spacecraft spectra parameters <span class="html-italic">A</span> and <span class="html-italic">k</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Vertical profile of ionization rates during selected EEP events observed by MEPED POES.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Vertical profile of ionization rates during selected EEP events observed by the MEPED POES satellite during 2003.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Ionization rates at a height of 25 km vs. Kp and Ap index. Blue squares and blue triangles—EEP ionization rates based on MEPED POES data. The square—EEP ionization rates vs. Ap. The triangle—EEP ionization rates vs. Kp.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 596 KiB  
Article
Dark Matter Detection in the Stratosphere
by Giovanni Cantatore, Serkant A. Çetin, Horst Fischer, Wolfgang Funk, Marin Karuza, Abaz Kryemadhi, Marios Maroudas, Kaan Özbozduman, Yannis K. Semertzidis and Konstantin Zioutas
Symmetry 2023, 15(6), 1167; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15061167 - 29 May 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2096
Abstract
We investigate the prospects for the direct detection of dark matter (DM) particles, incident on the upper atmosphere. A recent work relating the burst-like temperature excursions in the stratosphere at heights of ?38–47 km with low speed incident invisible streaming matter is the [...] Read more.
We investigate the prospects for the direct detection of dark matter (DM) particles, incident on the upper atmosphere. A recent work relating the burst-like temperature excursions in the stratosphere at heights of ?38–47 km with low speed incident invisible streaming matter is the motivation behind this proposal. As an example, dark photons could match the reasoning presented in that work provided they constitute part of the local DM density. Dark photons emerge as a U(1) symmetry within extensions of the standard model. Dark photons mix with real photons with the same total energy without the need for an external field, as would be required, for instance, for axions. Furthermore, the ionospheric plasma column above the stratosphere can resonantly enhance the dark photon-to-photon conversion. Noticeably, the stratosphere is easily accessible with balloon flights. Balloon missions with up to a few tons of payload can be readily assembled to operate for months at such atmospheric heights. This proposal is not limited to streaming dark photons, as other DM constituents could be involved in the observed seasonal heating of the upper stratosphere. Therefore, we advocate a combination of different types of measurements within a multi-purpose parallel detector system, in order to increase the direct detection potential for invisible streaming constituents that affect, annually and around January, the upper stratosphere. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Feynman diagram illustrating the dominant on-shell process for dark photon-to-photon wherein <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>χ</mi> </semantics></math> is the kinetic mixing parameter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cartoon illustration of the direct search concept, not to scale. For example, a gravitationally focused stream of incident dark photons can partially convert into real photons in a region of ≈100 km above the surface of the Earth, where the plasma density has the resonant value. Converted photons at around 6–8 eV are eventually absorbed in the upper stratosphere, ≈40 km above the surface, causing the observed local temperature excursions around January [<a href="#B2-symmetry-15-01167" class="html-bibr">2</a>]. A photon detector placed in the upper stratosphere, represented by a red ellipse in the figure, could directly measure excess photons coming from converted dark photons (A’) or secondary photons from DM particles interaction or decay.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The yellow region marked as stratosphere is the parameter space that this work could probe. The kinetic mixing parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>χ</mi> </semantics></math> is on the y-axis and the mass on the x-axis. For (Graph <b>B</b>), the x and y scale is logarithmic. (Graph <b>A</b>) at the top was adapted with permission from S. McDermott [<a href="#B10-symmetry-15-01167" class="html-bibr">10</a>] and (Graph <b>B</b>) at the bottom was adapted with permission from D. Veberic [<a href="#B31-symmetry-15-01167" class="html-bibr">31</a>].</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 5079 KiB  
Technical Note
HERMES: A Data and Specimens Transporter from the Stratosphere to the Ground—The First Experimental Flight
by Giovanni Romeo, Pasquale Adobbato, Simone Bacci, Giuseppe Di Stefano, Alessandro Iarocci, Amedeo Lepore, Massimo Mari, Silvia Masi, Francesco Pongetti, Giuseppe Spinelli and Massimiliano Vallocchia
Drones 2023, 7(5), 308; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7050308 - 5 May 2023
Viewed by 1916
Abstract
Large stratospheric balloons are the easiest access to near space. Large long duration balloons (LDBs) can float in the stratosphere for weeks collecting measurements (e.g., astrophysical or geophysical data) or samples (e.g., contaminants, volcanic ash, micrometeorites). The recovery of data media and samples [...] Read more.
Large stratospheric balloons are the easiest access to near space. Large long duration balloons (LDBs) can float in the stratosphere for weeks collecting measurements (e.g., astrophysical or geophysical data) or samples (e.g., contaminants, volcanic ash, micrometeorites). The recovery of data media and samples is a common problem in this type of experiment because direct radio communication becomes useless when the balloon crosses the horizon, and satellite links are too slow and expensive. For this reason, physical recovery of the payload is mandatory to obtain experimental results, which is a difficult task, especially in polar regions. The goal of HERMES (HEmera Returning MESsenger) is to allow researchers to obtain experimental data prior to payload recovery. HERMES is a system equipped with an autonomous glider capable of physically transporting data and samples from the stratosphere to a recovery point on the ground. The glider is installed on the balloon payload via a remotely controlled release system and is connected to the main computer to store a copy of the scientific data and to receive the geographic coordinates of the recovery point. This allows scientists to obtain experimental results before recovering the payload. The article describes HERMES and the first experimental flight of the entire system, which was conducted at Esrange Space Center (Kiruna, Sweden) in July 2022. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The overall view of the payload.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The payload block diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The glider is secured to the releaser.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The release command arrives: the glider is released.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Glider block diagram. <b>SSD</b> stores scientific data; <b>Com &amp; Contrl Iridium SBD</b> communicates via Iridium; <b>remote radio</b> and <b>telemetry radio</b> communicate via direct radio link; <b>autopilot</b> controls the aircraft using <b>ailerons</b> and <b>motor</b>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) The hot wire cutting machine; (<b>b</b>) A detail of the machine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mechanical drawing of the glider.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) The height–time diagram. (<b>b</b>) The 3D trajectory with the zoom of the landing helix.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>An estimation of the glider efficiency vs. height during the Fragneto Monforte experimental flight.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) The payload in flight configuration; (<b>b</b>) The launch method: Hercules.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The flight chain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) The last moments before the launch; (<b>b</b>) The balloon starts to rise.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The balloon trajectory (<a href="https://stratocat.com.ar/fichas-e/2022/KRN-20220721.htm" target="_blank">https://stratocat.com.ar/fichas-e/2022/KRN-20220721.htm</a> (accessed on 1 April 2023)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>) Altitude vs. time plot; (<b>b</b>) Distance from the base plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Glider altitude plot, where the red track indicates the presence of the direct telemetry link.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop