Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = spectral variation hypothesis (SVH)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 3097 KiB  
Technical Note
Use of Remote Sensing Techniques to Estimate Plant Diversity within Ecological Networks: A Worked Example
by Francesco Liccari, Maurizia Sigura and Giovanni Bacaro
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(19), 4933; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194933 - 2 Oct 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3181
Abstract
As there is an urgent need to protect rapidly declining global diversity, it is important to identify methods to quickly estimate the diversity and heterogeneity of a region and effectively implement monitoring and conservation plans. The combination of remotely sensed and field-collected data, [...] Read more.
As there is an urgent need to protect rapidly declining global diversity, it is important to identify methods to quickly estimate the diversity and heterogeneity of a region and effectively implement monitoring and conservation plans. The combination of remotely sensed and field-collected data, under the paradigm of the Spectral Variation Hypothesis (SVH), represents one of the most promising approaches to boost large-scale and reliable biodiversity monitoring practices. Here, the potential of SVH to capture information on plant diversity at a fine scale in an ecological network (EN) embedded in a complex landscape has been tested using two new and promising methodological approaches: the first estimates α and β spectral diversity and the latter ecosystem spectral heterogeneity expressed as Rao’s Quadratic heterogeneity measure (Rao’s Q). Both approaches are available thanks to two brand-new R packages: “biodivMapR” and “rasterdiv”. Our aims were to investigate if spectral diversity and heterogeneity provide reliable information to assess and monitor over time floristic diversity maintained in an EN selected as an example and located in northeast Italy. We analyzed and compared spectral and taxonomic α and β diversities and spectral and landscape heterogeneity, based on field-based plant data collection and remotely sensed data from Sentinel-2A, using different statistical approaches. We observed a positive relationship between taxonomic and spectral diversity and also between spectral heterogeneity, landscape heterogeneity, and the amount of alien species in relation to the native ones, reaching a value of R2 = 0.36 and R2 = 0.43, respectively. Our results confirmed the effectiveness of estimating and mapping α and β spectral diversity and ecosystem spectral heterogeneity using remotely sensed images. Moreover, we highlighted that spectral diversity values become more effective to identify biodiversity-rich areas, representing the most important diversity hotspots to be preserved. Finally, the spectral heterogeneity index in anthropogenic landscapes could be a powerful method to identify those areas most at risk of biological invasion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ecosystem Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area (red square) in relation to the European continent (top right). Representation of the Ecological Network model and location of sampling units within the study area (main figure). Colored lines and patches are corridors and nodes of the network, representing different habitat types and species-specific networks. EUNIS Habitat Codes are as follows: D4.11 <span class="html-italic">Schoenus nigricans</span> fens; D5.24 Fen <span class="html-italic">Cladium mariscus</span> beds; E1.55 Eastern sub-Mediterranean dry grassland; E2.2 Low and medium altitude hay meadows; E3.51 <span class="html-italic">Molinia caerulea</span> meadows and related communities; G1.A1A Illyrian <span class="html-italic">Quercus-Carpinus betulus</span> forests; G1.11 Riverine <span class="html-italic">Salix</span> woodland; G1.22 Southeast European <span class="html-italic">Fraxinus-Quercus-Alnus</span> forests; G1.41 <span class="html-italic">Alnus</span> swamp woods not on acid peat.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spectral α diversity map, expressed as Shannon index (H’), of the study area (<b>a</b>) and of the EN nodes (<b>b</b>). Spectral β diversity map, expressed as Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index (BC), produced by the projection of the n × n dimensional space of the dissimilarity matrix into an n × 3 dimensional space (PCoAs), of the study area (<b>c</b>) and of the EN nodes (<b>d</b>). Similar colors, resulting from the PCoA ordination, represent similar spectral plant communities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Rao’s Q index, calculated from the NDVI time series covering the year 2019 (Q<sub>NDVI</sub>) with the weight for the distance matrix set to infinite, for the study area (<b>a</b>). Rao’s Q index, calculated from the 10 bands of the Sentinel 2 image of 3 June 2019 (Q<sub>multi</sub>) with the weight for the distance matrix set to infinite, for the study area (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>tb-RDA ordination based on Hellinger pre-transformed species composition matrix, with site grouped per habitat and displaying the following variables: focal species richness (N.Foc), native species richness (N.Nat), Rao’s Q index, calculated from the 10 bands of the Sentinel 2 image of 3 June 2019 with the weight for the distance matrix set to infinite (Q<sub>multi</sub>INF), and ratio of alien to native species richness (RatioAN), Shannon index on land use diversity (ShannonLU).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3648 KiB  
Article
Spatial Characterisation of Vegetation Diversity in Groundwater-Dependent Ecosystems Using In-Situ and Sentinel-2 MSI Satellite Data
by Kudzai Shaun Mpakairi, Timothy Dube, Farai Dondofema and Tatenda Dalu
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(13), 2995; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14132995 - 23 Jun 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2891
Abstract
Groundwater-Dependent Ecosystems (GDEs) are under threat from groundwater over-abstraction, which significantly impacts their conservation and sustainable management. Although the socio-economic significance of GDEs is understood, their ecosystem services and ecological significance (e.g., biodiversity hotspots) in arid environments remains understudied. Therefore, under the United [...] Read more.
Groundwater-Dependent Ecosystems (GDEs) are under threat from groundwater over-abstraction, which significantly impacts their conservation and sustainable management. Although the socio-economic significance of GDEs is understood, their ecosystem services and ecological significance (e.g., biodiversity hotspots) in arid environments remains understudied. Therefore, under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 15, characterizing or identifying biodiversity hotspots in GDEs improves their management and conservation. In this study, we present the first attempt towards the spatial characterization of vegetation diversity in GDEs within the Khakea-Bray Transboundary Aquifer. Following the Spectral Variation Hypothesis (SVH), we used multispectral remotely sensed data (i.e., Sentinel-2 MSI) to characterize the vegetation diversity. This involved the use of the Rao’s Q to measure spectral diversity from several measures of spectral variation and validating the Rao’s Q using field-measured data on vegetation diversity (i.e., effective number of species). We observed that the Rao’s Q has the potential of spatially characterizing vegetation diversity of GDEs in the Khakea-Bray Transboundary Aquifer. Specifically, we discovered that the Rao’s Q was related to field-measured vegetation diversity (R2 = 0.61 and p = 0.00), and the coefficient of variation (CV) was the best measure to derive the Rao’s Q. Vegetation diversity was also used as a proxy for identifying priority conservation areas and biodiversity hotspots. Vegetation diversity was more concentrated around natural pans and along roads, fence lines, and rivers. In addition, vegetation diversity was observed to decrease with an increasing distance (>35 m) from natural pans and simulated an inverse piosphere (i.e., minimal utilization around the natural water pans). We provide baseline information necessary for identifying priority conservation areas within the Khakea-Bray Transboundary Aquifer. Furthermore, this work provides a pathway for resource managers to achieve SDG 15 as well as national and regional Aichi biodiversity targets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ecosystem Diversity)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Map of the Khakea-Bray TBA spanning across Botswana and South Africa. The study is overlaid on baseline topography imagery accessed from ArcMap [<a href="#B49-remotesensing-14-02995" class="html-bibr">49</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The conceptual interaction of groundwater and vegetation diversity in arid environments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Summarised flowchart of the steps and processes followed to characterise vegetation diversity in the Khakea-Bray TBA. The numbers show the main steps followed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Species dominance of the species observed in the sampled plots. The species dominance was measured using the dominance index, where Sp1 = <span class="html-italic">Aloe maculate</span>, Sp2 = <span class="html-italic">Asparagus</span> spp., Sp3 = <span class="html-italic">Dracaena trifasciata</span>, Sp4 = <span class="html-italic">Ehretia rigida</span>, Sp5 = <span class="html-italic">Eragrostis</span> spp., Sp6 = <span class="html-italic">Leonotis ocymifolia</span>, Sp7 = <span class="html-italic">Trifolium repens</span>, Sp8 = <span class="html-italic">Grewia flava</span>, Sp9 = <span class="html-italic">Leucas martinicensis</span>, Sp10 = <span class="html-italic">Lipia javani</span>, Sp11 = <span class="html-italic">Meitinas Polyacantha</span>, Sp12 = <span class="html-italic">Olea</span> spp., Sp13 = <span class="html-italic">Opuntia ficas indica</span>, Sp14 = <span class="html-italic">Scorzonera humilis</span>, Sp15 = <span class="html-italic">Senegalia nigrescens</span>, Sp16 = <span class="html-italic">Ledebouria marginata</span>, Sp17 = <span class="html-italic">Kalanchoe</span> spp., and Sp18 = <span class="html-italic">Ziziphus mucronata</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Vegetation diversity (Rao’s Q) derived from measures of spectral variation: (<b>a</b>) all the spectral bands, (<b>b</b>) coefficient of variation, (<b>c</b>) Normalised Difference Phenology Index (NDPI), and (<b>d</b>) principal component.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Linear regression of field-measured vegetation diversity and remote sensed diversity (Rao’s Q) in our study area. Remote sensed diversity (Rao’s Q) was derived from 20 m spatial resolution for all the spectral bands, the Normalised Difference Phenology Index (NDPI), the Coefficient of Variation (CV), and the first Principal Component (PC).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mean variation in remotely sensed diversity (Rao’s Q) between wet and dry natural pans using the coefficient of variation at 20 m spatial resolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The response of remotely sensed vegetation diversity (Rao’s Q) to distance from the natural pan between wet and dry natural pans.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 5275 KiB  
Article
The Feasibility of Leaf Reflectance-Based Taxonomic Inventories and Diversity Assessments of Species-Rich Grasslands: A Cross-Seasonal Evaluation Using Waveband Selection
by Rachael Helen Thornley, Anne Verhoef, France F. Gerard and Kevin White
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(10), 2310; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102310 - 10 May 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2138
Abstract
Hyperspectral leaf-level reflectance data may enable the creation of taxonomic inventories and diversity assessments of grasslands, but little is known about the stability of species-specific spectral classes and discrimination models over the course of a growing season. Here, we present a cross-seasonal dataset [...] Read more.
Hyperspectral leaf-level reflectance data may enable the creation of taxonomic inventories and diversity assessments of grasslands, but little is known about the stability of species-specific spectral classes and discrimination models over the course of a growing season. Here, we present a cross-seasonal dataset of seventeen species that are common to a temperate, dry and nutrient-poor calcareous grassland, which spans thirteen sampling dates, a week apart, during the spring and summer months. By using a classification model that incorporated waveband selection (a sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis), most species could be classified, irrespective of the sampling date. However, between 42 and 95% of the available spectral information was required to obtain these results, depending on the date and model run. Feature selection was consistent across time for 70 out of 720 wavebands and reflectance around 1410 nm, representing water features, contributed the most to the discrimination. Model transferability was higher between neighbouring sampling dates and improved after the “green-up” period. Some species were consistently easy to classify, irrespective of time point, when using up to six latent variables, which represented about 99% of the total spectral variance, whereas other species required many latent variables, which represented very small spectral differences. We concluded that it did seem possible to create reliable taxonomic inventories for combinations of certain grassland species, irrespective of sampling date, and that the reason for this could lie in their distinctive morphological and/or biochemical leaf traits. Model transferability, however, was limited across dates and cross-seasonal sampling that captures leaf development would probably be necessary to create a predictive framework for the taxonomic monitoring of grasslands. In addition, most variance in the leaf reflectance within this system was driven by a subset of species and this finding implies challenges for the application of spectral variance in the estimation of biodiversity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ecological Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) The 17 grassland species that were involved in this study; (<b>B</b>) a plot of 13 of those species within the Grime strategy space, where data were available; (<b>C</b>) the phylogenetic relationship between species; (<b>D</b>) the morphological and phenological characteristics of the leaves; (<b>E</b>) Ellenberg’s indicator values for light, moisture, pH and nitrogen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Satellite-derived time series of surface soil moisture (Sentinel-1) at a 1-km resolution; (<b>B</b>) regional daily precipitation averages; (<b>C</b>) the site-based green-up trajectory using EVI (Sentinel-2) at a 10-m resolution. The 13 field sampling dates are shown as red triangles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The value of <span class="html-italic">D</span> (the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic): a test of whether the distributions of the intra-specific and inter-specific distances were different from each other at each time point and across all sampling dates for each species class. The results are shown for both the Spectral Angle Mapper and the Euclidean distance. The values of <span class="html-italic">D</span> ranged from 1–0, with higher values representing distributions that were more distinct. A <span class="html-italic">p</span> value = 0.01 for the test is shown by a dashed line. Values above the line denote significantly different distributions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) The position within the spectra of components (latent variables) that were used for species–class determination for the 13 dates (day of year presented in the banner header). The darkest greys indicate components that captured more variations in the spectral data. (<b>B</b>) The selection rate of wavebands for model runs within each sampling date. Red bars represent wavelengths that were consistently selected in 10/10 runs; yellow bars are those that were only selected for some of the model runs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The number of times within each of the 13 sampling dates that wavebands were consistently selected in all model runs. A reference leaf spectrum (red line) is superimposed on the plot for contextualisation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Confusion matrix of the mean errors of the 10 model runs that were trained using data from single sampling dates and tested using data that were collected on the other sampling dates. The temporal dependence of the data was higher after DoY 153. (<b>B</b>) The error of the model that was trained using data from all sampling dates and tested using data from single sampling dates. The error bars show the standard error of the mean model error after 10 runs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>) The “scree plot” of the models at each time point, i.e., the variance in the X variable as explained by the model latent variables/components. The grey reference line represents the 99% variance in the X variable that was captured by six components, irrespective of sampling time; (<b>B</b>) species classification error over time with six components; (<b>C</b>) species classification error with the chosen number of components (i.e., the final model for each time point). Mean error is shown for each time point over the 10 model runs (the S.E. of the model runs was very small and is not shown).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The “ease” of classification, defined as the number of components (latent variables) produced from the sPLS-DA models that were required to classify a species to a &lt;10% error rate. Species are ranked from easiest to hardest to classify (left to right); (<b>A</b>) the mean and SE of the models across sampling dates; (<b>B</b>) the results from the model that was trained using the cross-seasonal dataset. Shaded bars show the species that were not classifiable to the required error rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>A</b>) The global sensitivity analysis of the radiative transfer model PRO-COSINE for leaf clip data with overlaid waveband selection for the first six components for two example time points (DoY 153 and 161); (<b>B</b>) the probability of the importance of traits for each of the six components over time using the wavelength selection from the best performing sPLS-DA models for each sampling date. The range of variance between model runs for each model component is presented in the panel header.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 5862 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Impact of Soil on Species Diversity Estimation Based on UAV Imaging Spectroscopy in a Natural Alpine Steppe
by Cong Xu, Yuan Zeng, Zhaoju Zheng, Dan Zhao, Wenjun Liu, Zonghan Ma and Bingfang Wu
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(3), 671; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030671 - 30 Jan 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4376
Abstract
Grassland species diversity monitoring is essential to grassland resource protection and utilization. “Spectral variation hypothesis” (SVH) provides a remote sensing method for monitoring grassland species diversity at pixel scale by calculating spectral heterogeneity. However, the pixel spectrum is easily affected by soil and [...] Read more.
Grassland species diversity monitoring is essential to grassland resource protection and utilization. “Spectral variation hypothesis” (SVH) provides a remote sensing method for monitoring grassland species diversity at pixel scale by calculating spectral heterogeneity. However, the pixel spectrum is easily affected by soil and other background factors in natural grassland. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based imaging spectroscopy provides the possibility of soil information removal by virtue of its high spatial and spectral resolution. In this study, UAV-imaging spectroscopy data with a spatial resolution of 0.2 m obtained in two sites of typical alpine steppe within the Sanjiangyuan National Nature Reserve were used to analyze the relationships between four spectral diversity metrics (coefficient of variation based on NDVI (CVNDVI), coefficient of variation based on multiple bands (CVMulti), minimum convex hull volume (CHV) and minimum convex hull area (CHA)) and two species diversity indices (species richness and the Shannon–Wiener index). Meanwhile, two soil removal methods (based on NDVI threshold and the linear spectral unmixing model) were used to investigate the impact of soil on species diversity estimation. The results showed that the Shannon–Wiener index had a better response to spectral diversity than species richness, and CVMulti showed the best correlation with the Shannon–Wiener index between the four spectral diversity metrics after removing soil information using the linear spectral unmixing model. It indicated that the estimation ability of spectral diversity to species diversity was significantly improved after removing the soil information. Our findings demonstrated the applicability of the spectral variation hypothesis in natural grassland, and illustrated the impact of soil on species diversity estimation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ecosystems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location of Sanjiangyuan National Nature Reserve (<b>left</b>), Maduo county (<b>middle</b>) with land cover data with 10 m spatial resolution from ChinaCover2020 [<a href="#B67-remotesensing-14-00671" class="html-bibr">67</a>], and two UAV imaging spectroscopy images (NIR: 860 nm, red: 660 nm, green: 560 nm) with 18 field-measured sample plots and photographs (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The relationships between species diversity and spectral diversity with soil information. The left column indicates the relationships between four spectral diversity metrics and species richness (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and the right column indicates the relationships between four spectral diversity metrics and Shannon–Wiener index (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The relationship between Shannon–Wiener index and spectral diversity without soil information. The left column indicates the relationship between Shannon–Wiener index and four spectral diversity metrics after removing the soil based on the NDVI threshold (NDVI threshold is 0.4. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>); The right column represents the relationship between Shannon–Wiener index and four spectral diversity metrics after removing the soil based on the linear spectral unmixing model (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The variation of four spectral diversity metrics between 18 sample plots before and after soil information removal. Each box shows the maximum, the upper quartile, the mean, the lower quartile and the minimum. Each spectral diversity metric includes three conditions: with soil information (blue), without soil information, removed by setting NDVI threshold (red) and without soil information, removed by linear spectral unmixing model (green).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Predicted Shannon–Wiener index with a spatial resolution of 1 m in the natural grassland of UAV flight region 1 (<b>left</b>) and UAV flight region 2 (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of Shannon-Wiener index and CV calculated by each single band from 390 nm to 1020 nm, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.61 (CV<sub>Multi</sub>) and 0.37 (CV<sub>NDVI</sub>) were tagged as blue and green horizontal lines.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 1278 KiB  
Article
Investigating the Relationship between Tree Species Diversity and Landsat-8 Spectral Heterogeneity across Multiple Phenological Stages
by Sabelo Madonsela, Moses A. Cho, Abel Ramoelo and Onisimo Mutanga
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(13), 2467; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132467 - 24 Jun 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3008
Abstract
The emergence of the spectral variation hypothesis (SVH) has gained widespread attention in the remote sensing community as a method for deriving biodiversity information from remotely sensed data. SVH states that spectral heterogeneity on remotely sensed imagery reflects environmental heterogeneity, which in turn [...] Read more.
The emergence of the spectral variation hypothesis (SVH) has gained widespread attention in the remote sensing community as a method for deriving biodiversity information from remotely sensed data. SVH states that spectral heterogeneity on remotely sensed imagery reflects environmental heterogeneity, which in turn is associated with high species diversity and, therefore, could be useful for characterizing landscape biodiversity. However, the effect of phenology has received relatively less attention despite being an important variable influencing plant species spectral responses. The study investigated (i) the effect of phenology on the relationship between spectral heterogeneity and plant species diversity and (ii) explored spectral angle mapper (SAM), the coefficient of variation (CV) and their interaction effect in estimating species diversity. Stratified random sampling was adopted to survey all tree species with a diameter at breast height of > 10 cm in 90 × 90 m plots distributed throughout the study site. Tree species diversity was quantified by the Shannon diversity index (H′), Simpson index of diversity (D2) and species richness (S). SAM and CV were employed on Landsat-8 data to compute spectral heterogeneity. The study applied linear regression models to investigate the relationship between spectral heterogeneity metrics and species diversity indices across four phenological stages. The results showed that the end of the growing season was the most ideal phenological stage for estimating species diversity, following the SVH concept. During this period, SAM and species diversity indices (S, H′, D2) had an r2 of 0.14, 0.24, and 0.20, respectively, while CV had an r2 of 0.22, 0.22, and 0.25, respectively. The interaction of SAM and CV improved the relationship between the spectral data and H′ and D2 (from r2 of 0.24 and 0.25 to r2 of 0.32 and 0.28, respectively) at the end of the growing season. The two spectral heterogeneity metrics showed differential sensitivity to components of plant diversity. SAM had a high relationship with H′ followed by D2 and then a lower relationship with S throughout the different phenological stages. Meanwhile, CV had a higher relationship with D2 than other plant diversity indices and its relationship with S and H′ remained similar. Although the coefficient of determination was comparatively low, the relationship between spectral heterogeneity metrics and species diversity indices was statistically significant (p < 0.05) and this supports the assertion that SVH could be implemented to characterize plant species diversity. Importantly, the application of SVH should consider (i) the choice of spectral heterogeneity metric in line with the purpose of the SVH application since these metrics relate to components of species diversity differently and (ii) vegetation phenology, which affects the relationship that spectral heterogeneity has with plant species diversity. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Area under study extending over the savannah ecosystem of South Africa with Landsat-8 image. The dots denote the field plots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Semi-variogram analysis depicting the scale of tree species diversity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Relationship between Landsat-8 spectral heterogeneity as computed by SAM and tree species diversity indices across different phenological stages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationship between Landsat-8 spectral heterogeneity as computed by CV and tree species diversity indices across different phenological stages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationship between SAM and CV interaction and tree species diversity indices across different phenological stages.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2496 KiB  
Article
Measuring Alpha and Beta Diversity by Field and Remote-Sensing Data: A Challenge for Coastal Dunes Biodiversity Monitoring
by Flavio Marzialetti, Silvia Cascone, Ludovico Frate, Mirko Di Febbraro, Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta and Maria Laura Carranza
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(10), 1928; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13101928 - 15 May 2021
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 5554
Abstract
Combining field collected and remotely sensed (RS) data represents one of the most promising approaches for an extensive and up-to-date ecosystem assessment. We investigated the potential of the so called spectral variability hypothesis (SVH) in linking field-collected and remote-sensed data in Mediterranean coastal [...] Read more.
Combining field collected and remotely sensed (RS) data represents one of the most promising approaches for an extensive and up-to-date ecosystem assessment. We investigated the potential of the so called spectral variability hypothesis (SVH) in linking field-collected and remote-sensed data in Mediterranean coastal dunes and explored if spectral diversity provides reliable information to monitor floristic diversity, as well as the consistency of such information in altered ecosystems due to plant invasions. We analyzed alpha diversity and beta diversity, integrating floristic field and Remote-Sensing PlanetScope data in the Tyrrhenian coast (Central Italy). We explored the relationship among alpha field diversity (species richness, Shannon index, inverse Simpson index) and spectral variability (distance from the spectral centroid index) through linear regressions. For beta diversity, we implemented a distance decay model (DDM) relating field pairwise (Jaccard similarities index, Bray–Curtis similarities index) and spectral pairwise (Euclidean distance) measures. We observed a positive relationship between alpha diversity and spectral heterogeneity with richness reporting the higher R score. As for DDM, we found a significant relationship between Bray–Curtis floristic similarity and Euclidean spectral distance. We provided a first assessment of the relationship between floristic and spectral RS diversity in Mediterranean coastal dune habitats (i.e., natural or invaded). SVH provided evidence about the potential of RS for estimating diversity in complex and dynamic landscapes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ecosystem Diversity)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Study area (reference system WGS84 33N, epsg: 32633) along with sampling plots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow describing the procedure followed for investigating the potential of the spectral variability hypothesis for depicting alpha and beta diversity levels on herbaceous coastal dune vegetation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Linear regression models of alpha floristic diversity: species richness (<b>a</b>), Shannon (<b>b</b>) and inverse Simpson (<b>c</b>) vs. spectral heterogeneity: mean distance from spectral principal component analysis (PCA) centroid. Shifting dunes: N14 EUNIS category; Transition dunes: N16 EUNIS category: Invaded dunes: coastal dune vegetation with the presence <span class="html-italic">Carpobrotus</span> sp. covering more than 25 percent.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distance decay models of Jaccard (<b>a</b>) and Bray–Curtis (<b>b</b>) species similarity versus spectral distance (spectral pairwise Euclidean distance). The linear regression is described by solid line, the quantile regressions considering four different τ (from upper to lower lines: 0.99, 0.95, 0.90, 0.75) are reported by dashed lines. Gray dots represent the sampling plots.</p>
Full article ">
1652 KiB  
Article
Spectro-Temporal Heterogeneity Measures from Dense High Spatial Resolution Satellite Image Time Series: Application to Grassland Species Diversity Estimation
by Mailys Lopes, Mathieu Fauvel, Annie Ouin and Stéphane Girard
Remote Sens. 2017, 9(10), 993; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9100993 - 25 Sep 2017
Cited by 40 | Viewed by 6732
Abstract
Grasslands represent a significant source of biodiversity that is important to monitor over large extents. The Spectral Variation Hypothesis (SVH) assumes that the Spectral Heterogeneity (SH) measured from remote sensing data can be used as a proxy for species diversity. Here, we argue [...] Read more.
Grasslands represent a significant source of biodiversity that is important to monitor over large extents. The Spectral Variation Hypothesis (SVH) assumes that the Spectral Heterogeneity (SH) measured from remote sensing data can be used as a proxy for species diversity. Here, we argue the hypothesis that the grassland’s species differ in their phenology and, hence, that the temporal variations can be used in addition to the spectral variations. The purpose of this study is to attempt verifying the SVH in grasslands using the temporal information provided by dense Satellite Image Time Series (SITS) with a high spatial resolution. Our method to assess the spectro-temporal heterogeneity is based on a clustering of grasslands using a robust technique for high dimensional data. We propose new SH measures derived from this clustering and computed at the grassland level. We compare them to the Mean Distance to Centroid (MDC). The method is experimented on 192 grasslands from southwest France using an intra-annual multispectral SPOT5 SITS comprising 18 images and using single images from this SITS. The combination of two of the proposed SH measures—the within-class variability and the entropy—in a multivariate linear model explained the variance of the grasslands’ Shannon index more than the MDC. However, there were no significant differences between the predicted values issued from the best models using multitemporal and monotemporal imagery. We conclude that multitemporal data at a spatial resolution of 10 m do not contribute to estimating the species diversity. The temporal variations may be more related to the effect of management practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dense Image Time Series Analysis for Ecosystem Monitoring)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area in southwest France and of the grasslands within the study area. The background is an aerial photograph issued from the French orthophoto database “BD ORTHO<sup>®</sup> ” (©IGN).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Histogram of (<b>a</b>) Shannon index H and (<b>b</b>) grasslands’ size in number of pixels <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>n</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>SPOT5 NDVI temporal profiles of all the pixels belonging to three grasslands along the H gradient: (<b>a</b>) grassland with a low level of biodiversity, (<b>b</b>) grassland with a medium level of biodiversity and (<b>c</b>) grassland with a high level of biodiversity. The floristic record of these three grasslands can be found in <a href="#app1-remotesensing-09-00993" class="html-app">Appendix A</a>, <a href="#remotesensing-09-00993-t003" class="html-table">Table A1</a>. The x-axis corresponds to the day of the year of 2015, and the y-axis corresponds to the NDVI. Grasslands have been voluntarily chosen by their high number of pixels for better visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Simulated pixels’ distributions for two different plots (<b>a</b>) and (<b>b</b>). Pixels are displayed in blue, and the centroids of the plots are displayed in red. The estimated MDC are very close while the spectral distributions of the plots are clearly different.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simulated distributions of three spectral species (blue, yellow, red) in a 3-dimensional space. (<b>b</b>) Clustering of the three distributions with PCA and <span class="html-italic">k</span>-means. (<b>c</b>) Clustering of the three distributions with Gaussian mixture models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Grassland clustered with an initial clustering of the landscape into 8 clusters. (<b>a</b>) Hard assignment of the pixels. One color corresponds to one cluster (orange, yellow, blue). (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) Soft assignment of the pixels. The grey-scaled color corresponds to the assignment probability <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>π</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics> </math> to cluster (<b>b</b>) orange, (<b>c</b>) yellow and (<b>d</b>) blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Overview of the method to compare the Spectral Heterogeneity (SH) measures (explanatory variables) to the Shannon index (response variable). Square rectangles correspond to data, and rounded rectangles correspond to a process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) False color image of a grassland acquired on 30 April 2015. The same grassland clustered using HDDC on multitemporal data with an initial clustering into (<b>b</b>) 8 clusters and (<b>c</b>) 150 clusters. Each cluster is represented by one color.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Adjusted coefficient of determination in the multivariate linear regression between different combinations of SH measures (V: log-transformed global variability or MDC, W: log-transformed within-class variability, B: log-transformed between-class variability, E: entropy) computed from multitemporal data and the Shannon index (response variable) depending on the number of clusters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Shannon index (H) best univariate linear correlations with different SH measures (E: entropy, V: log-transformed global variability or MDC, W: log-transformed within-class variability, B: log-transformed between-class variability) computed from multitemporal data. <span class="html-italic">C</span> is the corresponding number of clusters, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msup> <mover accent="true"> <mi>R</mi> <mo stretchy="false">¯</mo> </mover> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </semantics> </math> is the adjusted coefficient of determination and ** signifies <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt;0.001. The black line is the linear regression line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Adjusted coefficient of determination in the multivariate linear regression using one image acquired on (<b>a</b>) 30 April and (<b>b</b>) 29 June between different combinations of SH measures (V: log-transformed global variability or MDC, W: log-transformed within-class variability, B: log-transformed between-class variability, E: entropy) and the Shannon index (response variable) depending on the number of clusters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Maps of spectral heterogeneity inside three grasslands (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>). The first row shows the grasslands’ polygon limits in yellow on the SPOT5 false color image acquired on 10 May 2015. The second row shows the clusters after an HDDC clustering into eight clusters using multitemporal data. The color scale corresponds to the log-transformed variability of each cluster <span class="html-italic">c</span> in the grassland <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>g</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math>. (<b>a</b>) H = 0.10, E = 0, V = 10.13, W = 10.13, B = 0; (<b>b</b>) H = 1.57, E = 0.68, V = 10.06, W = 9.41, B = 9.33; (<b>c</b>) H = 2.89, E = 1.06, V = 9.58, W = 9.22, B = 8.42. The floristic record of these three grasslands can be found in the <a href="#app1-remotesensing-09-00993" class="html-app">Appendix A</a>, <a href="#remotesensing-09-00993-t003" class="html-table">Table A1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Mean NDVI temporal profiles of each cluster from the clustering into <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>8</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> clusters using multitemporal data. The x-axis is the month of year 2015, and the y-axis is the NDVI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Clustering of the same grassland (false color image of (<b>a</b>) 30 April and (<b>d</b>) 29 June) with an initial clustering into 150 clusters, using (<b>b</b>) the image of 30 April and (<b>c</b>) the full SITS, and into 20 clusters, using (<b>e</b>) the image of 29 June and (<b>f</b>) the full SITS.</p>
Full article ">
8448 KiB  
Article
Reconstructing Historical Land Cover Type and Complexity by Synergistic Use of Landsat Multispectral Scanner and CORONA
by Amir Reza Shahtahmassebi, Yue Lin, Lin Lin, Peter M. Atkinson, Nathan Moore, Ke Wang, Shan He, Lingyan Huang, Jiexia Wu, Zhangquan Shen, Muye Gan, Xinyu Zheng, Yue Su, Hongfen Teng, Xiaoyan Li, Jinsong Deng, Yuanyuan Sun and Mengzhu Zhao
Remote Sens. 2017, 9(7), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070682 - 3 Jul 2017
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5930
Abstract
Survey data describing land cover information such as type and diversity over several decades are scarce. Therefore, our capacity to reconstruct historical land cover using field data and archived remotely sensed data over large areas and long periods of time is somewhat limited. [...] Read more.
Survey data describing land cover information such as type and diversity over several decades are scarce. Therefore, our capacity to reconstruct historical land cover using field data and archived remotely sensed data over large areas and long periods of time is somewhat limited. This study explores the relationship between CORONA texture—a surrogate for actual land cover type and complexity—with spectral vegetation indices and texture variables derived from Landsat MSS under the Spectral Variation Hypothesis (SVH) such as to reconstruct historical continuous land cover type and complexity. Image texture of CORONA was calculated using a mean occurrence measure while image textures of Landsat MSS were calculated by occurrence and co-occurrence measures. The relationship between these variables was evaluated using correlation and regression techniques. The reconstruction procedure was undertaken through regression kriging. The results showed that, as expected, texture based on the visible bands and corresponding indices indicated larger correlation with CORONA texture, a surrogate of land cover (correlation >0.65). In terms of prediction, the combination of the first-order mean of band green, second-order measure of tasseled cap brightness, second-order mean of Normalized Visible Index (NVI) and second-order entropy of NIR yielded the best model with respect to Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), r-square, and variance inflation factors (VIF). The regression model was then used in regression kriging to map historical continuous land cover. The resultant maps indicated the type and degree of complexity in land cover. Moreover, the proposed methodology minimized the impacts of topographic shadow in the region. The performance of this approach was compared with two conventional classification methods: hard classifiers and continuous classifiers. In contrast to conventional techniques, the technique could clearly quantify land cover complexity and type. Future applications of CORONA datasets such as this one could include: improved quality of CORONA imagery, studies of the CORONA texture measures for extracting ecological parameters (e.g., species distributions), change detection and super resolution mapping using CORONA and Landsat MSS. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>The study region and spatial distribution of forest in 1980.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overview of the research methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Spatial distribution of residual values in CORONA imagery; and (<b>b</b>) testing for autocorrelation in regression residuals using Moran’s <span class="html-italic">I</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Experimental (crosses) and fitted model (line) variogram of regression residuals for use in predicting LC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Maps of: (<b>a</b>) CORONA image; (<b>b</b>) Landsat MSS false color composite of bands RGB—NIR2, Red, and Green; and (<b>c</b>) map of land cover type and complexity in 1978 predicted by regression kriging.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatterplot of actual observed LC against predictions using 234 randomly selected points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Maps of land cover in a forested region produced by: (<b>a</b>) Landsat MSS using SVM hard classifier; and (<b>b</b>) CORONA using density slicing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Maps of: (<b>a</b>) Forest Fraction using Landsat MSS based on SMA; and (<b>b</b>) land cover in forested regions using Landsat MSS and CORONA without using Kriging.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Yearly publications from 1998 to 2017 indexed by Web of Knowledge on: (<b>a</b>) CORONA satellite imagery; (<b>b</b>) IKONOS; (<b>c</b>) QuickBird; and (<b>d</b>) only aerial photograph. The search was conducted on 8 June 2017 to compare the number of publications on CORONA with other high spatial resolution imagery (<a href="http://apps.webofknowledge.com/" target="_blank">http://apps.webofknowledge.com/</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Visual difference between CORONA panchromatic image and Landsat MSS bands; (<b>a</b>) CORONA; (<b>b</b>) Landsat MSS4 (Green band); (<b>c</b>) Landsat MSS5 (Red band); (<b>d</b>) Landsat MSS6 (NIR1 band); and (<b>e</b>) Landsat MSS7 (NIR2 band).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop