Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (366)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = sandwich panel

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 28982 KiB  
Article
Low-Velocity Impact Response of Sandwich Structure with Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Cores
by Dong Wei, Shaoan Li, Laiyu Liang, Longfei Sun and Yaozhong Wu
Polymers 2025, 17(6), 712; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17060712 - 7 Mar 2025
Abstract
Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) sandwich structures were proposed based on the TPMSs. The test samples for the TPMS sandwich were prepared using Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) with PA12 as the base material. Their low-velocity impact responses were investigated using experimental tests and [...] Read more.
Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) sandwich structures were proposed based on the TPMSs. The test samples for the TPMS sandwich were prepared using Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) with PA12 as the base material. Their low-velocity impact responses were investigated using experimental tests and numerical simulation. The effect of structural parameters (relative density, panel thickness, impact energy, and TPMS core) on the impact performance of the sandwich structures was analyzed through parameter studies. The results indicate that the peak load and stiffness of the sandwich structure increase with the increase in relative density, panel thickness, and impact energy. Among three types of TPMS core sandwich structures, the Diamond sandwich structure exhibits the biggest peak load and best impact resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Physics and Theory)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Construction of the TPMS sandwich structures: (<b>a</b>) P-TPMS sandwich, (<b>b</b>) G-TPMS sandwich, (<b>c</b>) D-TPMS sandwich.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Low-velocity impact test setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>FE model of impact for the TPMS sandwich.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>True stress–strain curves of 3D-printed PA12 material.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Convergence of the peak loads under different element sizes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of force–time curves between test and simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Experimental and simulation force–time curves of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of energy–time curves between test and simulation of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of the experimental and simulation impact damage of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>: (<b>a</b>) D-0.2-1.5-10; (<b>b</b>) D-0.25-1.5-10; (<b>c</b>) D-0.3-1.5-10.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of the experimental and simulation pit depth of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Experimental and simulation force–time curves of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mi>f</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of energy–time curves between test and simulation of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mi>f</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of the experimental and simulation impact damage of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mi>f</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>: (<b>a</b>) D-0.25-1.0-10; (<b>b</b>) D-0.25-1.5-10; (<b>c</b>) D-0.25-2.0-10.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of the experimental and simulation pit depth of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mi>f</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Experimental and simulation force–time curves of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>E</mi> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison of energy–time curves between test and simulation of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>E</mi> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Comparison of the experimental and simulation impact damage of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>E</mi> </semantics></math>: (<b>a</b>) D-0.25-1.5-5; (<b>b</b>) D-0.25-1.5-10; (<b>c</b>) D-0.25-1.5-15.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Experimental and simulation pit depths of TPMS sandwich with different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>E</mi> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Experimental and simulation force–time curves of TPMS sandwich with different TPMS cores.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Comparison of energy–time curves between test and simulation of TPMS sandwich with different TPMS cores.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Comparison of the experimental and simulation impact damage of TPMS sandwich with different TPMS cores: (<b>a</b>) P-0.25-1.5-10; (<b>b</b>) G-0.25-1.5-10; (<b>c</b>) D-0.25-1.5-10.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Comparison of the experimental and simulation pit depth of TPMS sandwich with different TPMS cores.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 15543 KiB  
Article
Enhancing the Fatigue Properties of Rigid Polyurethane Foam by Dissipating the Mechanical Energy of Rubber Powder
by Jinlong Ju, Nana Yang, Yifei Zhang, Lei Yu, Guolu Ma and Wenhua Wu
Polymers 2025, 17(5), 705; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17050705 - 6 Mar 2025
Viewed by 100
Abstract
Rigid polyurethane-based foam is an ideal choice for sandwich-panel-filling materials due to its high strength, low thermal conductivity, high adhesion, and high chemical resistivity. Since sandwich panel materials often face cyclic mechanical loads during their service, it is significant to study the design [...] Read more.
Rigid polyurethane-based foam is an ideal choice for sandwich-panel-filling materials due to its high strength, low thermal conductivity, high adhesion, and high chemical resistivity. Since sandwich panel materials often face cyclic mechanical loads during their service, it is significant to study the design methods of fatigue-resistant rigid polyurethane foam and its fatigue failure mechanism to improve the performance of sandwich-panel-filling materials. In this study, a fatigue-resistant rubber powder/polyurethane composite material was prepared by introducing rubber powder, and its fatigue failure mechanism was systematically studied. The static mechanical test results indicate that with the introduction of 20% rubber powder, the compressive strength (at 85% strain) increased to 588 kPa. Additionally, thanks to the excellent energy absorption and dissipation properties of rubber powder, it can effectively dissipate mechanical energy during cyclic loading. The fatigue test results show that after the introduction of rubber powder, the fatigue life of the polyurethane foam material increases from 10,258 cycles (for PU, stress ratio 0.6) to 45,987 cycles (for 20R-PU, stress ratio 0.6). This study not only proves the fact that rubber powder can improve the fatigue performance of foam materials but also provides a potential option for the design of high-performance filling materials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Physics and Theory)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The design of the rubber/PU composite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Specimens for (<b>a</b>) tensile test and (<b>b</b>) compression test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The microstructure of the (<b>a</b>) PU; (<b>b</b>) 10R-PU; (<b>c</b>) 20R-PU; (<b>d</b>) 30R-PU; and (<b>e</b>) 40R-PU rubber/PU composite. (<b>f</b>) The typical structure of rubber in 40R-PU foam; (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) the electron energy scattering spectrum and elemental mapping of 40R-PU.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) The microstructure and (<b>b</b>) element distribution information of the rubber/PU interface, the red marked part is rubber particles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Compressive curve for PU and rubber/PU composite foams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Compressive strength and (<b>b</b>) collapse strain/strength for PU and rubber/PU composite foams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Tensile curve for PU and rubber/PU composite foams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Fracture strength, and (<b>b</b>) fracture strain for PU and rubber/PU composite foams during tensile test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Curves depicting the ratio between relative stress and cycles to failure for the composite foams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Fatigue fracture interface of the rubber/PU composite (Relative stress 0.6). The microstructure of PU with various load cycles: (<b>a</b>) ×100, (<b>b</b>) ×1000, and (<b>c</b>) ×10,000 (the crack area is between the red lines). The microstructure of 20R-PU with various load cycles: (<b>d</b>) ×100, (<b>e</b>) ×1000, and (<b>f</b>) ×10,000.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Mechanism of toughening polyurethane foam with rubber powder, the arrows point to the energy dissipation process of the composite foam material.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 6906 KiB  
Article
Flame Spread on an Active Photovoltaic–Roof System
by Olaia Aurrekoetxea-Arratibel, Nerea Otano-Aramendi, Daniel Valencia-Caballero, Iñigo Vidaurrazaga, Xabat Oregi and Xabier Olano-Azkune
Fire 2025, 8(3), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8030105 - 5 Mar 2025
Viewed by 120
Abstract
Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems in buildings must comply with both electrotechnical standards for module safety and local building codes, which typically do not address their electrical nature. This regulatory gap creates challenges in assessing the fire performance of PV systems. This paper presents [...] Read more.
Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems in buildings must comply with both electrotechnical standards for module safety and local building codes, which typically do not address their electrical nature. This regulatory gap creates challenges in assessing the fire performance of PV systems. This paper presents a procedure to adapt a common test method used in some building codes to assess external fire conditions for roofs, while maintaining operative PV modules. Two configurations were tested: an organic PV thin film on a metallic sandwich panel and a glass–glass-encapsulated organic PV module. The tests were conducted under high voltage and current conditions to simulate the systems’ behavior within a larger PV array. Significant electric arcs were observed during testing of the metallic sandwich panel configuration without glass protection when subjected to high voltages or currents. In these cases, total heat release increased by at least 30% compared to non-electrically loaded scenarios or glass-insulated PV modules, likely due to a greater damaged surface area. Electric arcs created new ignition sources, damaging whole PV modules, whereas in the case with no electrical load, propagation flames advanced toward both the upper edge and the corners of the sample, ultimately damaging the entire triangular area above the fire source. The results indicate that the electrical characteristics of PV systems can significantly impact external fire spread behavior. The study identifies challenges in maintaining system activity during testing and simulating real scenarios and proposes for future research directions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scheme of the prepared samples with OPV with no glass.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Position of the brand in the sandwich panel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Electrical connection set-ups. (<b>a</b>) Diagram of electrical connections defined in Boddaert et al. (created by the author based on [<a href="#B19-fire-08-00105" class="html-bibr">19</a>]); (<b>b</b>) diagram of electrical connections in Option A; (<b>c</b>) diagram of electrical connections in Option B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Calorimetric hood used for heat release rate (HRR) measurements. Gases from the fire test are collected in the hood, pass through the gas sampling in the duct, are analyzed in the analyzer, and data is collected on a computer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Position of the smoke curtains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Position of the thermocouples T1, T2, and T3 in the tests with glass-encapsulated OPV modules.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Heat release rate (HRR) of all the tests: Test 1 (Ref.), Test 2 (OPV), Test 3 (OPV<sub>2.5A</sub>), Test 4 (OPV<sub>1000V</sub>), Test 5 (G-OPV) and Test 6 (G-OPV<sub>2A</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Diagrams of the samples after the test. The burnt area is shown in dark. (<b>a</b>) Test 1 (Ref.), (<b>b</b>) Test 2 (OPV), (<b>c</b>) Test 3 (OPV<sub>2.5A</sub>), (<b>d</b>) Test 4 (OPV<sub>1000V</sub>), (<b>e</b>) Test 5 (G-OPV), and (<b>f</b>) Test 6 (G-OPV<sub>2A</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Diagrams of the samples after the test. The burnt area is shown in dark. (<b>a</b>) Test 1 (Ref.), (<b>b</b>) Test 2 (OPV), (<b>c</b>) Test 3 (OPV<sub>2.5A</sub>), (<b>d</b>) Test 4 (OPV<sub>1000V</sub>), (<b>e</b>) Test 5 (G-OPV), and (<b>f</b>) Test 6 (G-OPV<sub>2A</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Diagrams of the samples actively burning at 1500 s from the test start; the wood wool is already extinguished. (<b>a</b>) Test 2 (OPV), (<b>b</b>) Test 3 (OPV<sub>2.5A</sub>), and (<b>c</b>) Test 4 (OPV<sub>1000V</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Total heat release (THR) of all the tests: Test 1 (Ref.), Test 2 (OPV), Test 3 (OPV<sub>2.5A</sub>), Test 4 (OPV<sub>1000V</sub>), Test 5 (G-OPV), and Test 6 (G-OPV<sub>2A</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Temperatures recorded during Test 5 (G-OPV) and Test 6 (G-OPV<sub>2A</sub>) with three thermocouples: T1, T2, and T3. In red, the maximum operating temperature commonly defined for PV modules is shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Voltage values monitored in Test 3 (OPV<sub>2.5A</sub>), Test 4 (OPV<sub>1000V</sub>), and Test 6 (G-OPV<sub>2A</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Current values monitored in Test 3 (OPV<sub>2.5A</sub>), Test 4 (OPV<sub>1000V</sub>), and Test 6 (G-OPV<sub>2A</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Electrical connections before, during, and after the test in Test 3 (OPV<sub>2.5A</sub>). (<b>a</b>) Before the test; (<b>b</b>) some instant during the test; (<b>c</b>) after the test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Electrical connections before, during, and after the test in Test 4 (OPV<sub>1000V</sub>). (<b>a</b>) Before the test; (<b>b</b>) some instant during the test; (<b>c</b>) after the test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Electrical connections before, during, and after the test in Test 6 (G-OPV<sub>2A</sub>).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 7697 KiB  
Article
Dynamic Compression and Blast Failure Behavior of a Biomimetic Novel Lattice with Vertex Modifications Made of 316L Stainless Steel
by Fei Zhou, Zhihua Xue and Xiaofei Cao
Metals 2025, 15(3), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030284 - 5 Mar 2025
Viewed by 68
Abstract
A novel 316L stainless steel Vertex Modified BCC (VM-BCC) lattice unit cell with attractive performance characteristics is developed. Lattice structure, as well as the sandwich panel, are constructed. Numerical simulation is utilized to simulate the quasi-static compression, dynamic compression and blast behavior considering [...] Read more.
A novel 316L stainless steel Vertex Modified BCC (VM-BCC) lattice unit cell with attractive performance characteristics is developed. Lattice structure, as well as the sandwich panel, are constructed. Numerical simulation is utilized to simulate the quasi-static compression, dynamic compression and blast behavior considering the rate-dependent properties, elastoplastic response and nonlinear contact. Finite element results are validated by comparing with the experimental results. Parametric studies are conducted to gain insight into the effects of loading velocity, equivalent TNT load and explosion distance on the dynamic behavior of the lattice pattern and sandwich panel. Testing results indicate that the proposed 316L stainless steel VM-BCC structure exhibits more superior plateau stress and specific energy absorption (SEA) than those of the BCC or Octet one. The proposed novel lattice will provide reference for improving the protective efficiency in key equipment fields and enhancing overall safety. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fracture Mechanics of Materials—the State of the Art)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geometric configurations of the BCC, CM-BCC, V-BCC, Octet and VM-BCC lattice patterns; (<b>b</b>) VM-BCC design inspired by deep-sea glass sponge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Front-view schematic of the compression computational model; (<b>b</b>) Uniaxial tensile true stress–strain curve for static compression simulation. Herein, the true stress–strain curve is that of the average of the three dog-bone specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Air blast symmetry model on the lattice sandwich panel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Effect of element size on the stress–strain curves of the V-BCC lattice pattern; (<b>b</b>) Plateau stress values of the V-BCC lattice pattern at different element sizes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of the (<b>a</b>) compression stress–strain curves and the (<b>b</b>) deformation state between simulation and experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Quasi-static compression (<b>a</b>) stress–strain curves; (<b>b</b>) plateau stress and SEA; (<b>c</b>) deformation processes of the BCC, CM-BCC, V-BCC, Octet and VM-BCC lattice patterns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Low-speed impact compression (<b>a</b>) stress–strain curves; (<b>b</b>) plateau stress and SEA; (<b>c</b>) deformation processes of the BCC, CM-BCC, V-BCC, Octet and VM-BCC lattice patterns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Medium-speed impact compression (<b>a</b>) stress–strain curves; (<b>b</b>) plateau stress and SEA; (<b>c</b>) deformation processes of the BCC, CM-BCC, V-BCC, Octet and VM-BCC lattice patterns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>High-speed impact compression (<b>a</b>) stress–strain curves; (<b>b</b>) plateau stress and SEA; (<b>c</b>) deformation processes of the BCC, CM-BCC, V-BCC, Octet and VM-BCC lattice patterns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Plateau stress and (<b>b</b>) SEA of the BCC, CM-BCC, V-BCC, Octet and VM-BCC lattice patterns under different loading velocities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Back face deflection curves of the BCC, CM-BCC, V-BCC, Octet and VM-BCC lattice patterns at (<b>a</b>) 10 g; (<b>b</b>) 12 g; (<b>c</b>) 14 g equivalent TNT loads. (<b>d</b>) Maximum back face deflection values at different equivalent TNT loads.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Back face deflection curves of the BCC, CM-BCC, V-BCC, Octet and VM-BCC lattice patterns at (<b>a</b>) 14 mm; (<b>b</b>) 18 mm; (<b>c</b>) 22 mm explosion distances. (<b>d</b>) Maximum back face deflection values at different explosion distances.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Stress distribution characteristics of the structural patterns, intermediate core layer and back face under 10 g equivalent TNT load and 14 mm explosion distance.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3694 KiB  
Article
Research on the Thermal Performance and Dimensional Compatibility of Insulation Panels with Chinese Fir Facings: Insights from Field Investigations in Qiandongnan
by Sixian Dai, Jingkang Lin, Panpan Ma, Qiuyun Chen, Xiangyu Chen, Feibin Wang and Zeli Que
Buildings 2025, 15(5), 820; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15050820 - 5 Mar 2025
Viewed by 80
Abstract
The traditional timber architecture of Qiandongnan represents a rich cultural heritage. However, urbanization has led to the replacement of these structures with concrete and brick buildings, resulting in the loss of both functionality and cultural identity. To bridge the gap between traditional architecture [...] Read more.
The traditional timber architecture of Qiandongnan represents a rich cultural heritage. However, urbanization has led to the replacement of these structures with concrete and brick buildings, resulting in the loss of both functionality and cultural identity. To bridge the gap between traditional architecture and modern building needs, this study conducted field surveys to extract key design parameters from local structures, enabling the development of a modular framework for Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) based on the dimensions of traditional dwellings. Four types of SIPs were developed using Chinese fir, OSB, EPS, and XPS, and their thermal performance and heat stability were evaluated through theoretical analysis and hot box testing. The results show that all specimens met the required heat transfer coefficient. The combination of OSB and XPS showed a slightly lower heat transfer coefficient of 0.60 compared to Chinese fir, which had a coefficient of 0.62. However, the Chinese fir–XPS combination provided the longest time lag of 6.34 h, indicating superior thermal stability. Due to the widespread use of Chinese fir in local construction and its compatibility with the landscape, this combination is ideal for both energy efficiency and cultural preservation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Applications in Timber Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Traditional Dong dwellings in Bapa Village and their characteristic column-and-tie beam timber structure. (<b>a</b>) Traditional Dong Dwelling in Bapa Village. (<b>b</b>) Column-and-tie beam timber structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Production process for sandwich wall panels. (<b>a</b>) Even spreading of adhesive layer. (<b>b</b>) Surface of panel with adhesive layer applied. (<b>c</b>) Cold pressing. (<b>d</b>) Specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Hot box–cold box system for SIP wall thermal testing: 20-channel thermocouples (±0.5 °C) and dual heat flow meters under controlled conditions. (<b>a</b>) JTRG-B testing system. (<b>b</b>) Schematic of experimental setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Thermocouple and heat flow meter arrangement: 9 points per surface (300 mm spacing), with environmental sensors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Traditional dwelling construction in Qiandongnan Xiaohuang Village. (<b>a</b>) Construction of traditional dwellings involves use of various woodworking tools, such as axes, chisels, planes and saws. (<b>b</b>) Simplified construction methods rely on direct carving and experiential knowledge of local artisans.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Lightweight construction of traditional dwellings. (<b>a</b>) Chinese fir veneer panels used for walls. (<b>b</b>) Thin floors (20–30 mm) contributing to poor thermal performance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Traditional timber houses in Wu-Dong Miao Ethnic Village. (<b>a</b>) Sectional view showing floor heights (2000–2400 mm) designed as multiples of 8. (<b>b</b>) Second-floor plan with dimensions (e.g., 1860 mm, 2040 mm) reflecting cultural numerology and “Ya Bai” practices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Heat transfer coefficient of each specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Time-dependent heat flux changes of specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Time-dependent temperature changes at cold-side surface (<b>a</b>) and hot-side surface (<b>b</b>) of specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Time-dependent changes in environmental and surface temperatures at cold side for specimens (<b>a</b>) OX, (<b>b</b>) CX, (<b>c</b>) OE, and (<b>d</b>) CE.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 5864 KiB  
Article
Study of Impact Behavior of Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Aluminum Composite Sandwich Panels at Constant Energy Levels
by Ercan Şimşir
Coatings 2025, 15(3), 299; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15030299 - 4 Mar 2025
Viewed by 114
Abstract
In this investigation, we assessed the potential of aluminum composite panels (ACPs) in sustainable engineering applications, focusing on the effects of different glass fiber weights on impact resistance and energy absorption capacity. Aluminum composite panels are an attractive option for sustainable applications due [...] Read more.
In this investigation, we assessed the potential of aluminum composite panels (ACPs) in sustainable engineering applications, focusing on the effects of different glass fiber weights on impact resistance and energy absorption capacity. Aluminum composite panels are an attractive option for sustainable applications due to their lightweight and high-strength properties. In this study, low-velocity impact tests were conducted on panels with glass fiber weights of 200 g/m2 and 400 g/m2 and equal numbers of fiber layers. The tests were performed using a constant impact energy of 55 joules, and the force–time, force–displacement, energy–time, and energy–displacement behaviors of ACP, 200 ACP, and 400 ACP samples were analyzed. The results showed that the 400 ACP samples exhibited the highest impact strength, the highest energy absorption capacity, and the least damage. In contrast, the other two samples showed lower impact resistance and exhibited fiber breaks, delaminations, and core material damage on their surfaces. The different glass fiber weights used in this study contributed to increases in the impact resistance and energy absorption capacity. Positive correlations were found between the glass fiber weight, layer thickness, and impact strength. These findings provide new insights into how composite materials can be designed to optimize mechanical properties by adjusting the fiber weights in coatings. These results also offer valuable information for the development of next-generation materials used in various sustainable engineering fields, such as automotive engineering and vehicle technology. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Aluminum composite panel (ACP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Glass fiber composite woven fiber materials: (<b>a</b>) 200 g/m<sup>2</sup>, (<b>b</b>) 400 g/m<sup>2</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic representation of the production method of test samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Low-velocity impact-tester (CEAST 9350-Fractovis Plus).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Damage images of the ACP sample obtained as a result of impact.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Damage images obtained as a result of impact of 200 ACP sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Damage images obtained as a result of impact of 400 ACP sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>ACP, 200 ACP, and 400 ACP force–displacement graphs obtained as a result of low-velocity impact.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>ACP, 200 ACP, and 400 ACP force–time graphs obtained as a result of low-velocity impact.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>ACP, 200 ACP, and 400 ACP obtained as a result of low-velocity impact: (<b>a</b>) energy–time (<b>b</b>) energy–displacement graph.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4214 KiB  
Article
Metallic Metamaterials for Reducing the Magnetic Signatures of Ships
by Fabio Distefano, Roberto Zivieri, Gabriella Epasto, Antonio Pantano and Vincenzo Crupi
Metals 2025, 15(3), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/met15030274 - 3 Mar 2025
Viewed by 205
Abstract
In this study, the magnetic signatures of ship structures were investigated. The magnetic signature impacts both navigation safety and the health of the marine ecosystem. Reducing this signature is essential for minimising risks associated with navigation and protecting marine biodiversity. A finite element [...] Read more.
In this study, the magnetic signatures of ship structures were investigated. The magnetic signature impacts both navigation safety and the health of the marine ecosystem. Reducing this signature is essential for minimising risks associated with navigation and protecting marine biodiversity. A finite element model was developed to assess the magnetic signature of honeycomb sandwich panels for ship structures. A theoretical approach was proposed, and the predicted results were compared with the values obtained by the finite element analyses. Different types of structures were compared to evaluate the combined effect of materials and geometry on the magnetic signature. The finite element results and the theoretical predictions indicate that the use of metamaterial structures, consisting of honeycomb sandwich panels with a steel core and aluminium skins, produces a significant reduction of the ship magnetic signature compared to the one arising from a steel panel with the same bending stiffness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metallic Magnetic Materials: Manufacture, Properties and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Honeycomb geometrical parameters: a and <span class="html-italic">b</span> represent respectively the specimen’s length and width, <span class="html-italic">t</span> is the skin thickness, <span class="html-italic">c</span> is the core thickness, <span class="html-italic">t<sub>c</sub></span> is the foil thickness and <span class="html-italic">d<sub>c</sub></span> represents the cell dimension. (<b>a</b>) honeycomb sandwich panel; (<b>b</b>) unit cell of honeycomb core.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Results of the mesh sensitivity study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Domain simulating the earth’s magnetic field. (<b>b</b>) Honeycomb panel coordinate system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Trend of the induced magnetic signature on a path along the <span class="html-italic">z</span>-axis passing on the honeycomb’s centreline for BS 60 mm × 60 mm × 8.5 mm (black line), SHS 60 mm × 60 mm × 9 mm (red line), and ASHS 60 mm × 60 mm × 9 mm (blue line) calculated according to FEM at a distance of 10 m from the panel’s surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Induced magnetic signature vs. <span class="html-italic">z</span> coordinate till <span class="html-italic">z</span> = 10 m for BS 60 mm × 60 mm × 8.5 mm (black line), SHS 60 mm × 60 mm × 9 mm (red line), and ASHS 60 mm × 60 mm × 9 mm (blue line). Inset: induced magnetic signature vs. <span class="html-italic">z</span> coordinate till <span class="html-italic">z</span> = 10 m for SHS (red line) and ASHS (blue line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Trend of the induced magnetic signature on a path along the <span class="html-italic">z</span>-axis passing on the honeycomb’s centreline for BS 60 mm × 60 mm × 8.5 mm (black line), SHS 60 mm × 60 mm × 9 mm (red line), and ASHS 60 mm × 60 mm × 9 mm (blue line) calculated according to FEM at a distance of 1 m from the panel’s surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Induced magnetic signature vs. <span class="html-italic">z</span> coordinate till <span class="html-italic">z</span> = 1 m for BS 60 mm × 60 mm × 8.5 mm (black line), SHS 60 mm × 60 mm × 9 mm (red line), and ASHS 60 mm × 60 mm × 9 mm (blue line). Inset: induced magnetic signature vs. <span class="html-italic">z</span> coordinate till <span class="html-italic">z</span> = 1 m for SHS (red line) and ASHS (blue line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Induced magnetic signature vs. <span class="html-italic">z</span> coordinate till <span class="html-italic">z</span> = 10 m for BS 600 mm × 600 mm × 8.5 mm (black line), SHS 600 mm × 600 mm × 9 mm (red line), and 600 mm × 600 mm × 9 mm (blue line). Inset: induced magnetic signature vs. <span class="html-italic">z</span> coordinate till <span class="html-italic">z</span> = 10 m for the honeycomb with steel skins (red line) and the honeycomb with aluminium skins (blue line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Induced magnetic signature vs. <span class="html-italic">z</span> coordinate till <span class="html-italic">z</span> = 1 m for BS 600 mm × 600 mm × 8.5 mm (black line), SHS 600 mm × 600 mm × 9 mm (red line), and ASHS 600 mm × 600 mm × 9 mm (blue line). Inset: induced magnetic signature vs. <span class="html-italic">z</span> coordinate till <span class="html-italic">z</span> = 1 m for SHS (red line) and ASHS (blue line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison between the induced magnetic signature vs. <span class="html-italic">z</span> coordinate of the FEM (red lines) and of the TM (black lines) till <span class="html-italic">z</span> = 0.2 m for (<b>a</b>) BS 60 mm × 60 mm × 8.5 mm, (<b>b</b>) SHS 60 mm × 60 mm × 9 mm, and (<b>c</b>) ASHS 60 mm × 60 mm × 9 mm.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2517 KiB  
Article
Bending Analysis of Symmetrical Porous Functionally Graded Sandwich Panels
by Zhicheng Huang, Yingjie Chen, Xingguo Wang and Fulei Chu
Symmetry 2025, 17(3), 327; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17030327 - 21 Feb 2025
Viewed by 177
Abstract
The study of the mechanical behavior of functionally graded material (FGM) sandwich plates under thermo-mechanical loading is of great significance for advanced structural design. This study systematically verifies the applicability of the shear strain functions proposed by Reddy and Touratier in the nonlinear [...] Read more.
The study of the mechanical behavior of functionally graded material (FGM) sandwich plates under thermo-mechanical loading is of great significance for advanced structural design. This study systematically verifies the applicability of the shear strain functions proposed by Reddy and Touratier in the nonlinear bending analysis of porous FGM sandwich plates. Using the existing four-variable shear deformation theory framework, the governing equations are derived through the principle of minimum potential energy, and the Navier method is applied for a numerical solution. For the first time, the study systematically compared the effects of three different porosity distribution patterns on dimensionless deflection, and verified the reliability of the model by comparing it with literature data. The results demonstrate that the adopted shear strain functions can accurately predict the influence of key parameters, including layer thickness ratio, aspect ratio, side-to-thickness ratio, volume fraction index, and porosity, on the deflection performance of sandwich plates. This research provides an important verification basis for the theoretical analysis and engineering application of FGM sandwich plates, particularly offering quantitative evidence for assessing the influence of porosity effects on theoretical prediction accuracy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Mechanical Engineering: Properties and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Functionally graded sandwich panels, where <span class="html-italic">a</span>, <span class="html-italic">b</span>, and <span class="html-italic">h</span> are the length, width, and height, respectively. (<b>b</b>) Porosity distribution model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Dimensionless deflection distribution along the X axis. (<b>b</b>) Dimensionless deflection distribution along the Y axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variations in the dimensionless deflection of a porous FMG sandwich plate with edge thickness ratio under different volume fraction index <span class="html-italic">k</span> (<span class="html-italic">xi</span> = 0.25).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Variations in the dimensionless deflection of a porous FMG sandwich plate with edge thickness ratio under different volume fraction index <span class="html-italic">k</span> (<span class="html-italic">xi</span> = 0.25).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Variations in the dimensionless deflection of a porous FMG sandwich plate with aspect ratio under different gradient index s (<span class="html-italic">xi</span> = 0.25).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Variations in the dimensionless deflection of a porous FMG sandwich plate with aspect ratio under different gradient index s (<span class="html-italic">xi</span> = 0.25).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variations in the dimensionless deflection of a porous FMG sandwich plate with edge thickness ratio under different porosity <span class="html-italic">xi</span> (<span class="html-italic">s</span> = 2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Variations in the dimensionless deflection of a porous FMG sandwich plate with aspect ratio under different porosity <span class="html-italic">xi</span> (<span class="html-italic">s</span> = 2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Effect of different edge thickness ratios on the dimensionless deflection of FMG sandwich panels under mechanical and thermal loading. (<b>b</b>) Effect of different lengths and widths on the dimensionless deflection of FMG sandwich panels under mechanical and thermal loads.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4186 KiB  
Article
Eco-Efficiency of Concrete Sandwich Panels with Different Insulation Core Materials
by Bruna Moura, Tiago Ramos da Silva, Nelson Soares and Helena Monteiro
Sustainability 2025, 17(4), 1687; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041687 - 18 Feb 2025
Viewed by 467
Abstract
Given the current need to improve the thermal and energy performance of buildings, special attention has been given to the building envelope and materials. Concrete sandwich panels (CSPs) are versatile composite construction elements whose popularity is increasing given their properties, e.g., good thermal [...] Read more.
Given the current need to improve the thermal and energy performance of buildings, special attention has been given to the building envelope and materials. Concrete sandwich panels (CSPs) are versatile composite construction elements whose popularity is increasing given their properties, e.g., good thermal and acoustic insulation, durability, and fire resistance. Nevertheless, besides their properties, it is important to evaluate the sustainability of composite panels under development. This work aims to assess the eco-efficiency of six CSPs with distinct insulation materials: lightweight concrete (LWC), cork, glass wool, and expanded polystyrene (EPS). Coupling both life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) analysis, this study derives eco-efficiency indicators to inform decisions regarding CSP environmental and economic performances. The results of the LCA and LCC showed that the high-performance concrete (HPC) layer was the main hotspot of the CSPs in all scenarios. Moreover, the best scenario changed when different environmental impact categories were considered. Thus, using multiple environmental indicators is recommended to avoid problem-shifting. Considering the final cost, the CSP with cork is the most expensive panel to produce, with the other five options having very similar manufacturing prices. On average, raw material inputs, labour, and material delivery account for 62.9%, 18.1%, and 17.1% of the total costs, respectively. Regarding the eco-efficiency results, the most eco-efficient scenario changed with the environmental indicator used. Cork seems to be the best option when considering the carbon footprint of the panels, whereas when considering other environmental indicators, the recycled EPS scenario has the best eco-efficiency and the CSP with cork the worst. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart and key characteristics of CSP production that are being analysed. Note that CAC stands for Calcium Aluminate Cement and OPC for Ordinary Portland Cement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow model based on the MFCA methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Potential environmental impacts obtained for the six scenarios under study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sensitivity analysis results on transportation scenarios for the CSPs; FU: 1 m<sup>2</sup> of CSP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of the results obtained in this work with the ones available in the literature (CC); <span class="html-italic">Cradle-to-gate</span> approach; FU of 1 m<sup>2</sup> of panel [<a href="#B1-sustainability-17-01687" class="html-bibr">1</a>,<a href="#B3-sustainability-17-01687" class="html-bibr">3</a>,<a href="#B16-sustainability-17-01687" class="html-bibr">16</a>]. Note that in Sahmenko’s [<a href="#B3-sustainability-17-01687" class="html-bibr">3</a>] study, the following scenarios were considered: (i) external foam concrete layers with foam polystyrene as the inner core; (ii) external average density hemp layers with an inner lightweight hemp layer; (iii) interior high-density hemp layer with lightweight hemp inner core and an average-density hemp as exterior layer; and (iv) external high-density hemp layers and a lime-based hemp composite core.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Life cycle costs per m<sup>2</sup> of panel for the six CSP scenarios under evaluation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sensitivity analysis on the effect of the raw material inflation rate and labour rate on the production cost of the six CSP scenarios under evaluation. RMIR—raw material inflation rate; LIR—labour inflation rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Eco-efficiency matrixes for the CC, POF, and RU(F) environmental indicators.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 8649 KiB  
Article
Modeling Key Characteristics of Rigid Polyisocyanurate Foams to Improve Sandwich Panel Production Process
by Mikelis Kirpluks, Beatrise Sture-Skela, Uldis Bariss, Iveta Audzevica, Uldis Pasters, Nikolajs Kurma and Laima Vēvere
Materials 2025, 18(4), 881; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18040881 - 17 Feb 2025
Viewed by 312
Abstract
This study explores the optimization of rigid polyisocyanurate (PIR) foam formulations, focusing on foaming kinetics that significantly influence the foam’s microstructure and thermal insulation properties. By systematically altering components such as isocyanate, polyols, catalysts, blowing agents, and additives, this research investigates their effects [...] Read more.
This study explores the optimization of rigid polyisocyanurate (PIR) foam formulations, focusing on foaming kinetics that significantly influence the foam’s microstructure and thermal insulation properties. By systematically altering components such as isocyanate, polyols, catalysts, blowing agents, and additives, this research investigates their effects on key characteristics including cell density, mechanical strength, and thermal conductivity. A statistical approach known as response surface modeling (RSM) was employed to identify relationships between formulation variables and performance metrics. The optimization aimed to enhance thermal insulation while ensuring feasibility for industrial-scale production, particularly for sandwich-type PIR panels. Two distinct formulations, with isocyanate indices of 335 and 400, were developed to assess the impact of various parameters on properties like foaming start time, gel time, and density. The results indicated that the choice of blowing agents and catalysts played a pivotal role in controlling foaming kinetics and final mechanical properties. The optimized formulations exhibited competitive thermal conductivity values (around 23.7 mW/(m·K)) and adequate compression strength (0.32 MPa), aligning closely with commercially available materials. These findings affirm the potential for enhancing production efficiency and performance consistency in the manufacturing of rigid PIR foams for insulation applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>LF polyol and n-pentane influence on foaming start time for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>a</b>) 335 and (<b>b</b>) 400; trimerization and blowing catalyst influence on foaming start time for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>c</b>) 335 and (<b>d</b>) 400.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>LF polyol and n-pentane influence on foaming start time for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>a</b>) 335 and (<b>b</b>) 400; trimerization and blowing catalyst influence on foaming start time for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>c</b>) 335 and (<b>d</b>) 400.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>LF polyol and n-pentane influence on foaming gel time for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>a</b>) 335 and (<b>b</b>) 400; trimerization and blowing catalyst influence on foaming gel time for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>c</b>) 335 and (<b>d</b>) 400.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>LF polyol and n-pentane influence on foaming gel time for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>a</b>) 335 and (<b>b</b>) 400; trimerization and blowing catalyst influence on foaming gel time for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>c</b>) 335 and (<b>d</b>) 400.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>LF polyol and n-pentane influence on thermal conductivity for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>a</b>) 335 and (<b>b</b>) 400; trimerization and blowing catalyst influence on thermal conductivity for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>c</b>) 335 and (<b>d</b>) 400.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>LF polyol and n-pentane influence on apparent density for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>a</b>) 335 and (<b>b</b>) 400; trimerization and blowing catalyst influence on apparent density for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>c</b>) 335 and (<b>d</b>) 400.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>LF polyol and n-pentane influence on compression strength for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>a</b>) 335 and (<b>b</b>) 400; trimerization and blowing catalyst influence on compression strength for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>c</b>) 335 and (<b>d</b>) 400.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>LF polyol and n-pentane influence on compression modulus for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>a</b>) 335 and (<b>b</b>) 400; trimerization and blowing catalyst influence on compression modulus for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>c</b>) 335 and (<b>d</b>) 400.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>LF polyol and n-pentane influence on desirability for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>a</b>) 335 and (<b>b</b>) 400; trimerization and blowing catalyst influence on desirability for rigid PIR foam with an isocyanate index of (<b>c</b>) 335 and (<b>d</b>) 400.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 17875 KiB  
Article
Development and Characterization of Novel Hybrid Particleboard Made from Several Non-Wood Lignocellulosic Materials
by Fazilla Oktaviani Tarigan, Luthfi Hakim, Agus Purwoko, Tito Sucipto, Halimatuddahliana Nasution, Widya Fatriasari, Muhammad Adly Rahandi Lubis, Jajang Sutiawan, Mohammad Irfan Bakhsi, Nam-Hun Kim, Petar Antov, Seng Hua Lee, Rangabhashiyam Selvasembian, Mohd Hazwan Hussin, Manggar Arum Aristri and Apri Heri Iswanto
Polymers 2025, 17(4), 512; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17040512 - 16 Feb 2025
Viewed by 379
Abstract
The green transition trend in the wood-based panel industry aims to reduce environmental impact and waste production, and it is a viable approach to meet the increasing global demand for wood and wood-based materials as roundwood availability decreases, necessitating the development of composite [...] Read more.
The green transition trend in the wood-based panel industry aims to reduce environmental impact and waste production, and it is a viable approach to meet the increasing global demand for wood and wood-based materials as roundwood availability decreases, necessitating the development of composite products as alternatives to non-wood lignocellulosic raw materials. As a result, the purpose of this study is to examine and assess the physical, mechanical, and acoustic properties of particleboard manufactured from non-wood lignocellulosic biomass. The core layer was composed of non-wood lignocelluloses (banana stem, rice straw, coconut fiber, sugarcane bagasse, and fibrous vascular bundles (FVB) from snakefruit fronds), whereas the surface was made of belangke bamboo (Gigantochloa pruriens) and wood. The chemical characteristics, fiber dimensions and derivatives, and contact angles of non-wood lignocellulosic materials were investigated. The contact angle, which ranged from 44.57 to 62.37 degrees, was measured to determine the wettability of these materials toward adhesives. Hybrid particleboard (HPb) or sandwich particleboard (SPb) samples of 25 cm × 25 cm with a target density of 0.75 g/cm3 and a thickness of 1 cm were manufactured using 7% isocyanate adhesive (based on raw material oven dry weight). The physical parameters of the particleboard, including density, water content, water absorption (WA), and thickness swelling (TS), ranged from 0.47 to 0.79 g/cm3, 6.57 to 13.78%, 16.46 to 103.51%, and 3.38 to 39.91%, respectively. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the particleboard, including the modulus of elasticity (MOE), bending strength (MOR), and internal bond strength (IB), varied from 0.39 to 7.34 GPa, 6.52 to 87.79 MPa, and 0.03 to 0.69 MPa, respectively. On the basis of these findings, the use of non-wood lignocellulosic raw materials represents a viable alternative for the production of high-performance particleboard. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Challenges in Wood and Wood-Based Materials III)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Non-wood lignocellulosic materials.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Raw materials used for the surface layers of the hybrid particleboard produced in this work.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Calculation of contact angle. Description: a: liquid (adhesive), b: fiber diameter, c: distance between fibers, d: contact angle of water with fiber, e: depression from the meniscus formed by water.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Three-layer particleboard.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Alpha-cellulose content in non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Hemicellulose content in non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Holocellulose content in non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Lignin content in non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Extractive substance contents in non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Ash content of non-wood lignocellulosic materials. L1: banana stem; L2: rice straw; L3: coconut husk; L4: bagasse; L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Fiber images of banana stems and coconut husks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Banana stem and rice straw lumens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Contact angle values for the non-wood lignocellulosic materials: L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm frond FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Density of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various types of surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Moisture content of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various types of surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Water absorption of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various types of surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Thickness swelling of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various types of surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>MOE of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>MORs of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Internal bonds of SPb fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials and various types of surface layers. P0: without surface layers, P1: 1 mm bamboo strand, P2: 3 mm bamboo strand, P3: 1 mm wood strand, P4: 3 mm wood strand, P5: veneer, L1: banana stem, L2: rice straw, L3: coconut husk, L4: bagasse, L5: snakefruit palm fronds FVB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Sound absorption coefficient values for the particleboard samples fabricated from non-wood lignocellulosic materials without surface layers. L1P0 (banana stem board without a surface layer), L1P0 (rice straw board without surface layers), L3P0 (coconut husk board without surface layers), L4P0 (bagasse board without a surface layer), and L5P0 (FVB snakefruit palm frond board without surface layers).</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Sound absorption coefficient values for the surface layers of snakefruit palm fronds.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 6975 KiB  
Article
Thermo-Mechanical Performance of Sustainable Lightweight Sandwich Panels Utilizing Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete
by Mariam Farouk Ghazy, Metwally abd allah Abd Elaty, Mohamed Abd Elkhalek Sakr and Eslam Mohamed Arafa
Buildings 2025, 15(4), 593; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15040593 - 14 Feb 2025
Viewed by 391
Abstract
Sandwich panels, consisting of two concrete wythes that encase an insulating core, are designed to improve energy efficiency and reduce the weight of construction applications. This research examines the thermal and flexural properties of a novel sandwich panel that incorporates ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete [...] Read more.
Sandwich panels, consisting of two concrete wythes that encase an insulating core, are designed to improve energy efficiency and reduce the weight of construction applications. This research examines the thermal and flexural properties of a novel sandwich panel that incorporates ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) and cellular lightweight concrete (CLC) as its core material. Seven sandwich panel specimens were tested for their thermo-flexural performance using four-point bending tests. The experimental parameters included variations in UHPFRC thickness (20 mm and 30 mm) and different shear connector types (shear keys, steel bars, and post-tension steel bars). The study also assessed the effects of adding steel mesh reinforcement to the UHPFRC layer and evaluated the performance of UHPFRC box sections without a CLC core. The analysis concentrated on several critical factors, such as initial, ultimate, and serviceability loads, load–deflection relationships, load–end slip, load–strain relationships, composite action ratios, crack patterns, and failure modes. The thermal properties of the UHPFRC and CLC were evaluated using a transient plane source technique. The results demonstrated that panels using post-tension steel bars as shear connectors achieved flexural performance, and the most favorable composite action ratios reached 68.8%. Conversely, the box section exhibited a brittle failure mode when compared to the other sandwich panels tested. To effectively evaluate mechanical and thermal properties, it is important to design panels that have adequate load-bearing capacity while maintaining low thermal conductivity. This study introduced a thermo-mechanical performance coefficient to evaluate both the thermal and mechanical performance of the panels. The findings indicated that sandwich panels with post-tension steel bars achieved the highest thermo-mechanical performance, while those with steel connectors had the lowest performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Direct tension test. (<b>a</b>) Test specimen. (<b>b</b>) Test setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Details of sandwich panel specimens. (<b>A</b>) UC-0-20. (<b>B</b>) UC-0-30. (<b>C</b>) UC-SK-30. (<b>D</b>) UC-SC-30. (<b>E</b>) UC-SPT-30. (<b>F</b>) UC-0-30/M. (<b>G</b>) U-0-30/B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Details of sandwich panel specimens. (<b>A</b>) UC-0-20. (<b>B</b>) UC-0-30. (<b>C</b>) UC-SK-30. (<b>D</b>) UC-SC-30. (<b>E</b>) UC-SPT-30. (<b>F</b>) UC-0-30/M. (<b>G</b>) U-0-30/B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Details of PCS specimens. (<b>a</b>) Form work. (<b>b</b>) Placing UHPFC. (<b>c</b>) Bottom layer casting. (<b>d</b>) CLC placing. (<b>e</b>) Casting top layer. (<b>f</b>) Casting U-0-30/B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Details of PCS specimens. (<b>a</b>) Form work. (<b>b</b>) Placing UHPFC. (<b>c</b>) Bottom layer casting. (<b>d</b>) CLC placing. (<b>e</b>) Casting top layer. (<b>f</b>) Casting U-0-30/B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Typical flexural test setup for sandwich panel specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Transient plane source test to determine the thermal properties of UHPFRC and CLC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Experimental setup of hotbox test. (<b>a</b>) Hot-box apparatus. (<b>b</b>) Data logger. (<b>c</b>) Thermocouple positions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Load–deflection behavior for the tested sandwich panel specimens. (<b>a</b>) Effect of UHPFRC thickness. (<b>b</b>) Effect of shear connector. (<b>c</b>) Effect of UHPFRC reinforcement. (<b>d</b>) Comparing UHPFRC-CLC sandwich panel and UHPFRC box section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Load–deflection behavior for the tested sandwich panel specimens. (<b>a</b>) Effect of UHPFRC thickness. (<b>b</b>) Effect of shear connector. (<b>c</b>) Effect of UHPFRC reinforcement. (<b>d</b>) Comparing UHPFRC-CLC sandwich panel and UHPFRC box section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Load–end slip responses for the tested sandwich panel specimens. (<b>a</b>) Effect of UHPFRC thickness. (<b>b</b>) Effect of shear connectors. (<b>c</b>) Effect of UHPFRC reinforcement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Load–strain responses (compression and tension concrete strains). (<b>a</b>) Effect of UHPFRC thickness. (<b>b</b>) Effect of shear connectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Non-composite and fully composite sandwich panels. (<b>a</b>) Non-composite action. (<b>b</b>) Fully composite action.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Degree of composite action for tested sandwich panel specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Failure mode of the tested composite panel specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>Failure mode of the tested composite panel specimens.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>One-dimensional heat transfer model. (<b>a</b>) Insulation layer. (<b>b</b>) Shear connector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Predicted and measured temperatures for UC-0-30 specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Heat flux rate for UC-0-30.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Predicted and calculated thermal conductivity.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 1386 KiB  
Article
A Panel of Diverse Inflammatory Biomarkers Is Not Associated with BMI-Calibrated Obesity nor with Dyslipidemia or Dysglycemia in Clinically Healthy Adults Aged 20 to 40 Years
by Mai S. Sater, Zainab H. A. Malalla, Muhalab E. Ali and Hayder A. Giha
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(2), 207; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22020207 - 31 Jan 2025
Viewed by 551
Abstract
Objectives: Low-grade metabolic inflammation is associated with several chronic metabolic disorders, including obesity. However, no concrete evidence that supports obesity as a direct cause of chronic inflammation. This study aims to identify the association of inflammation with obesity in apparently healthy adults. Methods: [...] Read more.
Objectives: Low-grade metabolic inflammation is associated with several chronic metabolic disorders, including obesity. However, no concrete evidence that supports obesity as a direct cause of chronic inflammation. This study aims to identify the association of inflammation with obesity in apparently healthy adults. Methods: In this study, 162 seemingly healthy volunteers, aged between 20 and 40 years, of comparable sex ratio, were recruited and categorized based on their body mass index (BMI) into four obesity scales: normal (N), overweight (OW), obese (OB), and severely obese (SOB). After clinical examination, fasting blood samples were collected from the study subjects for glycemic (fasting blood glucose—FBG, and HbA1c) and lipid (total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, and triacyl glycerides -TAG) profile analysis. In addition, plasma levels of a panel of diverse inflammatory biomarkers, IL6, IL8, procalcitonin (PCT), TREM1, and uPAR were analyzed by sandwich ELISA. Results: The results showed that LDLC, TAG, FBG, and HbA1c were significantly higher in the obese (OB and SOB) group, compared to the non-obese (N and OW) group, while HDLc was significantly lower. The biomarker levels were not correlated with age or significantly differed between males and females. Importantly, levels of all assessed inflammatory biomarkers were comparable between the obesity classes. Moreover, the assessed biomarkers in subjects with dyslipidemia or dysglycemia were comparable to those with normal profiles. Finally, the biomarker levels were not correlated with the obesity, glycemic, or lipidemic parameters. Conclusions: After correction for age and co-morbidities, our results deny the association of discrete obesity, probably dyslipidemia, and dysglycemia with systemic chronic inflammation. Further studies of local and systemic inflammation in non-elderly, healthy obese subjects are needed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Comparison of the median (25–75%) plasma concentrations (AU = arbitrary units) of five inflammatory biomarkers, IL-6 [<b>A</b>], IL-8 [<b>B</b>], procalcitonin (PCT) [<b>C</b>], TREM-1 [<b>D</b>], and uPAR [<b>E</b>], between four BMI-calibrated obesity classes (normal (N), overweight (OW), obese (OB), and severely obese (SOB)), of healthy non-elderly adults (20–40 years). There were no significant differences in the levels of the tested inflammatory biomarkers between the different obesity classes, using the Kruskal–Wallis One-Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks (KW), <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are shown in the figure. The horizontal line within each bar is the median value, the bottom and top lines of the bar are the 25% and 75%, respectively, caps of the lower and upper vertical lines are the 5% and 95% percentiles, and the open circles are outliers. The biomarker concentrations are shown in <a href="#ijerph-22-00207-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a> as a figure extension.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The figure shows the inflammatory response to dyslipidemia and dysglycemia in healthy non-elderly subjects (20–40 years), in the full spectrum of BMI-calibrated obesity. Comparison of the median (25–75%) plasma concentrations of five inflammatory biomarkers, IL-6 [<b>A1</b>–<b>A5</b>], IL-8 [<b>B1</b>–<b>B5</b>], procalcitonin (PCT) [<b>C1</b>–<b>C5</b>], TREM-1 [<b>D1</b>–<b>D5</b>], and uPAR [<b>E1</b>–<b>E5</b>], using arbitrary unit (AU), between subjects with normal vs. abnormal HbA1c [<b>A1</b>–<b>E1</b>], fasting blood glucose (FBG) [<b>A2</b>–<b>E2</b>], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) [<b>A3</b>–<b>E3</b>], triacyl-glycerides (TAG) [<b>A4</b>–<b>E4</b>], and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) [<b>A5</b>–<b>E5</b>]. There were no significant differences in the concentrations of any of the five tested inflammatory biomarkers between the subjects with normal vs. abnormal glycemic or lipidemic profiles, using Mann–Whitney Rank Sum Test (MW), <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are shown in the figure, which were all &gt;0.05. Within the bars, the horizontal line is the median value, the bars’ top and bottom lines are 25% and 75%, respectively, caps of the lower and upper vertical lines are 5% and 95%, and the open circles are outliers. Note: The abnormal parameters were determined based on the local reference values, which were almost consistent with international values.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 6108 KiB  
Article
Ultimate Strength Analysis of Aluminium Honeycomb Sandwich Panels Subjected to Uniaxial Compressive Loads and Lateral Pressure
by Mohamed Elsaka and Yordan Garbatov
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(1), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13010146 - 15 Jan 2025
Viewed by 929
Abstract
Ultimate strength is critical for hull structures because it determines the maximum load the structure can withstand before catastrophic failure. Aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels provide excellent energy absorption and a high strength-to-weight ratio. However, further investigation of honeycomb sandwich panel structural performance is [...] Read more.
Ultimate strength is critical for hull structures because it determines the maximum load the structure can withstand before catastrophic failure. Aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels provide excellent energy absorption and a high strength-to-weight ratio. However, further investigation of honeycomb sandwich panel structural performance is needed in typical marine conditions. This study focuses on the numerical analysis of honeycomb sandwich panels employing the nonlinear finite element method through the commercial software ANSYS. It investigates their performance under uniaxial compression and varying lateral pressure conditions while considering different cell edge lengths and core height configurations. Several structural configurations are compared to the experimental work published in the literature. Enhanced by experimental accuracy, the present study is a further step in expanding the application of honeycomb sandwich panels for ship hull applications that may lead to light and energy-efficient structures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Studies in Marine Mechanical and Naval Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geometry of the conventional panel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Support Constraints and Applied Loads.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Meshed model of (<b>a</b>) stiffened panel and (<b>b</b>) honeycomb sandwich panel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Stress-strain curves comparison between numerical simulations and experimental tests (T1 and T2) for honeycomb sandwich panels under uniaxial compressive loading.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Deformed specimen comparison between (<b>a</b>) experimental tests and (<b>b</b>) numerical simulations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>First Eigenvalue Buckling Mode for (<b>a</b>) Steel Stiffened Panel and (<b>b</b>) Aluminium Stiffened Panel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Deformed shapes of the steel stiffened panel under combined axial load and lateral pressure (<b>a</b>) without lateral pressure (0 kPa) and (<b>b</b>) with maximum lateral pressure (100 kPa).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Deformed shapes of the aluminium stiffened panel under combined axial load and lateral pressure (<b>a</b>) without lateral pressure (0 kPa) and (<b>b</b>) with maximum lateral pressure (100 kPa).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Force-displacement curves for steel and aluminium stiffened panels under 0, 50, and 100 kPa lateral pressures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Force-displacement curves for aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels with cell edge lengths of 20 mm, 25 mm, and 30 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>First Eigenvalue Buckling Mode for the honeycomb sandwich panel with a cell length of 30 mm, a core height of 30 mm, and a core thickness of 1 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Deformed shapes of the honeycomb sandwich panel with a core height of 30 mm under combined axial load and lateral pressure (<b>a</b>) without lateral pressure (0 kPa) and (<b>b</b>) with maximum lateral pressure (100 kPa).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Deformed shapes of the honeycomb sandwich panel with a core height of 45 mm under combined axial load and lateral pressure (<b>a</b>) without lateral pressure (0 kPa) and (<b>b</b>) with maximum lateral pressure (100 kPa).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Deformed shapes of the honeycomb sandwich panel with a core height of 60 mm under combined axial load and lateral pressure (<b>a</b>) without lateral pressure (0 kPa) and (<b>b</b>) with maximum lateral pressure (100 kPa).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Force-displacement curves for a honeycomb panel with a 30 mm cell edge length and core heights of 30 mm, 45 mm, and 60 mm under varying lateral pressure levels.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 7815 KiB  
Article
Design and Characteristics of a Single-Story Building Model Incorporating Waste
by Mohamed Darwish, Mohamed Elnakeb, Marina Moawad, Marwan Mohamed Shawki, Ehab Abdelhamid, Donia Eldwib, Mohamed Nagib Abouzeid, Maram Saudy, Safwan Khedr and Khaled Nassar
Buildings 2025, 15(2), 177; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15020177 - 9 Jan 2025
Viewed by 893
Abstract
The construction field is one of the largest sectors and industries worldwide. This industry is the main industry accused of contributing to greenhouse gases and increasing the effects of climate change. However, the construction industry is indispensable, accordingly in an attempt to decrease [...] Read more.
The construction field is one of the largest sectors and industries worldwide. This industry is the main industry accused of contributing to greenhouse gases and increasing the effects of climate change. However, the construction industry is indispensable, accordingly in an attempt to decrease the greenhouse gas effects of construction this research presents the manuscript for building a one-story building with all components including waste products. The building model used a strip foundation with a concrete mix design incorporating recycled concrete as a partial replacement for aggregates, cement hollow blocks containing granite waste instead of conventional cement blocks, and sandwiched insulated panels made of wood-plastic composites for the roof. The structural soundness of the system was tested by loading it with a load surpassing its design load in addition to measuring the deflection and checking its abidance to the code limitations. The thermal efficiency was tested by measuring the temperatures in comparison with the outside of the building for a span of 7 days with data recorded every 1 h. Analysis of both the short-term and long-term costs and carbon emissions was performed by acquiring the carbon emissions per unit of material from literature and multiplying it by the quantities of the materials used within the different building alternatives. That study showed that the roofs made of Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) using Wood-Plastic Composite (WPC) facings when used with hollow-block cement block walls have shown enduring cost efficiency and improved thermal insulation, leading to diminished energy usage, life-cycle expenses, and carbon emissions. Furthermore, the proposed system is more environmentally friendly than conventional reinforced concrete technologies due to their lower costs and emissions in addition to improving sustainability through utilizing recycled materials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Recycled Polypropylene (PP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Musky-Waste Wood.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>WPC Panels Materials and Production Technique.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SAP2000 Model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Interaction Diagram to Achieve Un-Supported Spans for SIP Panels due to Various Loads.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SAP2000 Deflection Diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Constructed Full-Scale Model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Project Timeline.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Structural testing of the full-scale model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Qingping Monitor Interface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Qingping Sensor Data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Temperature Data retreived from Weather Station in Cairo Airport.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The Alternatives Detailed Cost Breakdown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Alternatives Cost Comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>All Alternatives Detailed Carbon Emissions Breakdown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Alternatives Carbon Emissions Comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Heat Flow of the Alternatives Comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Life Cycle Cost of the Alternatives Comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Life Cycle Carbon Emissions of the Alternatives Comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>CBR Ratios of the Alternatives.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>The load-deflection curve for the tested model versus the numerically reached load-deflection curve and the design load.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Temperature Data Comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Relative Humidity Comparison.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop