Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (92)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = soil salinity inversion

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 14501 KiB  
Article
Root-Zone Salinity in Irrigated Arid Farmland: Revealing Driving Mechanisms of Dynamic Changes in China’s Manas River Basin over 20 Years
by Guang Yang, Xuejin Qiao, Qiang Zuo, Jianchu Shi, Xun Wu and Alon Ben-Gal
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(22), 4294; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224294 - 18 Nov 2024
Viewed by 314
Abstract
The risk of soil salinization is prevalent in arid and semi-arid regions, posing a critical challenge to sustainable agriculture. This study addresses the need for accurate assessment of regional root-zone soil salt content (SSC) and understanding of underlying driving mechanisms, which [...] Read more.
The risk of soil salinization is prevalent in arid and semi-arid regions, posing a critical challenge to sustainable agriculture. This study addresses the need for accurate assessment of regional root-zone soil salt content (SSC) and understanding of underlying driving mechanisms, which are essential for developing effective salinization mitigation and water management strategies. A remote sensing inversion technique, initially proposed to estimate root-zone SSC in cotton fields, was adapted and validated more widely to non-cotton farmlands. Validation results (with a coefficient of determination R2 > 0.53) were obtained using data from a three-year (2020–2022) regional survey conducted in the arid Manas River Basin (MRB), Xinjiang, China. Based on this adapted technique, we analyzed the spatiotemporal distributions of root-zone SSC across all farmlands in MRB from 2001 to 2022. Findings showed that root-zone SSC decreased significantly from 5.47 to 3.77 g kg−1 over the past 20 years but experienced a slight increase of 0.15 g kg1 in recent five years (2017–2022), attributed to cultivated area expansion and reduced irrigation quotas due to local water shortages. The driving mechanisms behind root-zone SSC distributions were analyzed using an approach combined with two machine learning algorithms, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP), to identify influential factors and quantify their impacts. The approach demonstrated high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.96 ± 0.01, root mean squared error RMSE = 0.19 ± 0.03 g kg1, maximum absolute error MAE = 0.14 ± 0.02 g kg1) in evaluating SSC drivers. Factors such as initial SSC, crop type distribution, duration of film mulched drip irrigation implementation, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), irrigation amount, and actual evapotranspiration (ETa), with mean (SHAP value) ≥ 0.02 g kg−1, were found to be more closely correlated with root-zone SSC variations than other factors. Decreased irrigation amount appeared as the primary driver for recent increased root-zone SSC, especially in the mid- and down-stream sections of MRB. Recommendations for secondary soil salinization risk reduction include regulation of the planting structure (crop choice and extent of planting area) and maintenance of a sufficient irrigation amount. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area. The Manas River Basin was divided into 17 different partitions based on topography and irrigation zones, namely: north Xiayedi (North XYD), south Xiayedi (South XYD), north Mosuowan (North MSW), south Mosuowan (South MSW), north Xinhuzongchang (North XHZC), south Xinhuzongchang (South XHZC), north Anjihai (North AJH), south Anjihai (South AJH), north Jingouhe (North JGH), south Jingouhe (South JGH), north Shihezi (North SHZ), south Shihezi (South SHZ), north Manas (North MNS), south Manas (South MNS), Danangou (DNG), Ningjiahe (NJH), Qingshuihe (QSH).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Layout of sampling points in the Manas River Basin from 2020 to 2022: (<b>a</b>) Location and land use distribution of irrigation zones in 2022 (the planting structure changed slightly from 2020 to 2022); (<b>b</b>) sampling point layout in AJH irrigation zone in 2020; (<b>c</b>) sampling point layout in MSW irrigation zone in 2020; (<b>d</b>) sampling point layout in AJH irrigation zone in 2021; (<b>e</b>) sampling point layout in MSW irrigation zone in 2021; (<b>f</b>) sampling point layout in DNG irrigation zone in 2021; (<b>g</b>) sampling point layout in North XYD irrigation zone in 2022; (<b>h</b>) sampling point layout in North SHZ irrigation zone in 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparisons between measured (<span class="html-italic">SSC<sub>measured</sub></span>) and fitted (<span class="html-italic">SSC<sub>fitted</sub></span>) or simulated (<span class="html-italic">SSC<sub>simulated</sub></span>) root-zone soil salt content of wheat fields in the Manas River Basin from 2020 to 2022: (<b>a</b>) 1:1 diagram; (<b>b</b>) Coefficient of determination (<span class="html-italic">R</span><sup>2</sup>), root mean squared error (<span class="html-italic">RMSE</span>), maximum absolute error (<span class="html-italic">MAE</span>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparisons between measured (<span class="html-italic">SSC</span><sub>measured</sub>) and fitted (<span class="html-italic">SSC</span><sub>fitted</sub>) or simulated (<span class="html-italic">SSC</span><sub>simulated</sub>) root-zone soil salt content of maize (and other minor crops) fields in the Manas River Basin from 2020 to 2022: (<b>a</b>) 1:1 diagram; (<b>b</b>) Coefficient of determination (<span class="html-italic">R</span><sup>2</sup>), root mean squared error (<span class="html-italic">RMSE</span>), maximum absolute error (<span class="html-italic">MAE</span>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distributions of root-zone soil salt content (<span class="html-italic">SSC</span>) and salinization classification categories during the peak growth stage of crops in the Manas River Basin in: (<b>a</b>) 2002; (<b>b</b>) 2007; (<b>c</b>) 2011; (<b>d</b>) 2017; (<b>e</b>) 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in root-zone soil salt content (<span class="html-italic">SSC</span>) and areas of different categories of salinized soil in the Manas River Basin from 2001 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>SHAP bar plot (<b>a</b>) and summary plot (<b>b</b>) of the XGBoost model trained based on different factors affecting root-zone soil salt content in the Manas River Basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>SHAP dependence plot of the top seven influencing factors with mean (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfenced close="|" open="|"> <mrow> <mrow> <mi>SHAP</mi> <mo> </mo> <mi>value</mi> </mrow> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>) ≥ 0.02 g kg<sup>−1</sup>: (<b>a</b>) Initial <span class="html-italic">SSC</span>; (<b>b</b>) CFP; (<b>c</b>) MFP; (<b>d</b>) IPF; (<b>e</b>) NDVI; (<b>f</b>) irrigation; (<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">TET<sub>a</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SHAP waterfall plots of influencing factors in the partitions of upstream mountain DNG (<b>a</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>i</b>), upstream piedmont plain South AJH (<b>b</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>j</b>), midstream oasis plain North AJH (<b>c</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>k</b>) and downstream oasis–desert transition North XYD (<b>d</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>l</b>) in 2002 (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>), 2011 (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) and 2022 (<b>i</b>–<b>l</b>). Red columns are positive SHAP values and blue columns negative.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2928 KiB  
Article
Assessment of the Effects of Biochar on the Physicochemical Properties of Saline–Alkali Soil Based on Meta-Analysis
by Tingting Mao, Yaofeng Wang, Songrui Ning, Jiefei Mao, Jiandong Sheng and Pingan Jiang
Agronomy 2024, 14(10), 2431; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102431 - 20 Oct 2024
Viewed by 839
Abstract
Enhancing global agricultural sustainability critically requires improving the physicochemical properties of saline–alkali soil. Biochar has gained increasing attention as a strategy due to its unique properties. However, its effect on the physicochemical properties of saline–alkali soil varies significantly. This study uses psychometric meta-analysis [...] Read more.
Enhancing global agricultural sustainability critically requires improving the physicochemical properties of saline–alkali soil. Biochar has gained increasing attention as a strategy due to its unique properties. However, its effect on the physicochemical properties of saline–alkali soil varies significantly. This study uses psychometric meta-analysis across 137 studies to synthesize the findings from 1447 relatively independent data sets. This study investigates the effects of biochar with different characteristics on the top 20 cm of various saline–alkali soils. In addition, aggregated boosted tree (ABT) analysis was used to identify the key factors of biochar influencing the physicochemical properties of saline soils. The results showed that biochar application has a positive effect on improving soil properties by reducing the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) by 30.31% and 28.88%, respectively, with a notable 48.97% enhancement in cation exchange capacity (CEC). A significant inverse relationship was found between soil salinity (SC) and ESP, while other factors were synergistic. Biochar application to mildly saline soil (<0.2%) and moderately saline soil (0.2–0.4%) demonstrated greater improvement in soil bulk density (SBD), total porosity (TP), and soil moisture content (SMC) compared to highly saline soil (>0.4%). However, the reduction in SC in highly saline soil was 4.9 times greater than in moderately saline soils. The enhancement of soil physical properties positively correlated with higher biochar application rates, largely driven by soil movements associated with the migration of soil moisture. Biochar produced at 401–500 °C was generally the most effective in improving the physicochemical properties of various saline–alkali soils. In water surplus regions, for mildly saline soil with pH < 8.5, mixed biochar (pH 6–8) at 41–80 t ha−1 was the most effective in soil improvement. Moreover, in water deficit areas with soil at pH ≥ 8.5, biochar with pH ≤ 6 applied at rates of >80 t ha−1 showed the greatest benefits. Agricultural residue biochar showed superior efficiency in ameliorating highly alkaline (pH ≥ 8.5) soil. In contrast, the use of mixed types of biochar was the most effective in the amelioration of other soil types. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Water Use and Irrigation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Total effect of biochar on soil bulk density (SBD), total porosity (TP), soil moisture content (SMC), soil pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil salt content (SC), exchange sodium percent (ESP), and sodium adsorption (SAR). The dots and error bars indicate the mean percentage change and 95% confidence interval (CI), and the effect size was considered statistically significant if the CI did not include zero, with red dots representing no statistical significance. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of response variables and the percentage change.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spearman correlations between the effect size of soil bulk density (SBD), total porosity (TP), soil moisture content (SMC), soil pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil salt content (SC), exchange sodium percent (ESP), and sodium adsorption (SAR). Correlation significance levels are displayed in the upper right triangle (above the diagonal line), with symbols * and *** denoting significance at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, respectively, while non-significant values show their exact <span class="html-italic">p</span> values. Blue and red colors indicate negative and positive correlations, respectively. The lower left triangle shows the correlation coefficient (r) values (below the diagonal line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The influence of biochar application on physicochemical properties under different soil characteristics as follows: (<b>a</b>) soil bulk density (SBD), (<b>b</b>) total porosity (TP), (<b>c</b>) soil moisture content (SMC), (<b>d</b>) soil pH, (<b>e</b>) cation exchange capacity (CEC), (<b>f</b>) soil salt content (SC), (<b>g</b>) exchange sodium percent (ESP), and (<b>h</b>) sodium adsorption (SAR). The dots and error bars indicate the mean percentage change and 95% confidence interval (CI); the effect size was considered statistically significant if the CI did not include zero, with red dots representing no statistical significance. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of response variables and the percentage change.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The impact of biochar with different characteristics on soil physicochemical properties as follows: (<b>a</b>) soil bulk density (SBD), (<b>b</b>) total porosity (TP), (<b>c</b>) soil moisture content (SMC), (<b>d</b>) soil pH, (<b>e</b>) cation exchange capacity (CEC), (<b>f</b>) soil salt content (SC), (<b>g</b>) exchange sodium percent (ESP), and (<b>h</b>) sodium adsorption (SAR). The dots and error bars indicate the mean percentage change and 95% confidence interval (CI); the effect size was considered statistically significant if the CI did not include zero, with red dots representing no statistical significance. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of response variables and the percentage change.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The relative influence of soil properties and biochar characteristic factors on soil physicochemical properties as follows: (<b>a</b>) soil bulk density (SBD), (<b>b</b>) total porosity (TP), (<b>c</b>) soil moisture content (SMC), (<b>d</b>) soil pH, (<b>e</b>) cation exchange capacity (CEC), (<b>f</b>) soil salt content (SC), (<b>g</b>) exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and (<b>h</b>) sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) based on the aggregated boosted tree model (ABT).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The overall impact of applying biochar with different characteristics on soil physicochemical properties under different soil characteristics as follows: (<b>a</b>) moisture surplus, (<b>b</b>) moisture deficit, (<b>c</b>) light salinization, (<b>d</b>) moderate salinization, (<b>e</b>) heavy salinization, (<b>f</b>) pH ≤ 8.5, (<b>g</b>) pH 8.5–9.5, and (<b>h</b>) pH &gt; 9.5. The dots and error bars indicate the mean percentage change and 95% confidence interval (CI); the effect size was considered statistically significant if the CI did not include zero, with red dots representing no statistical significance. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of response variables and the percentage change.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 7571 KiB  
Article
Soil Salinity Inversion Based on a Stacking Integrated Learning Algorithm
by Haili Dong and Fei Tian
Agriculture 2024, 14(10), 1777; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101777 - 9 Oct 2024
Viewed by 653
Abstract
Soil salinization is an essential risk factor for agricultural development and food security, and obtaining regional soil salinity information more reliably remains a priority problem to be solved. To improve the accuracy of soil salinity inversion, this study focuses on the Manas River [...] Read more.
Soil salinization is an essential risk factor for agricultural development and food security, and obtaining regional soil salinity information more reliably remains a priority problem to be solved. To improve the accuracy of soil salinity inversion, this study focuses on the Manas River Basin oasis area, the largest oasis farming area in Xinjiang, as the study area and proposes a new soil salinity inversion model based on stacked integrated learning algorithms. Firstly, we selected four machine learning regression models, namely, random forest (RF), back propagation neural network, support vector regression, and convolutional neural network, for performance evaluation. Based on the model performance, we selected the more effective RF and BPNN as the basic regression models and further constructed a stacking integrated learning model. This stacking integration learning model improved the prediction accuracy by training a secondary model to fuse the prediction results of these two basic models as new features. We compared and analyzed the stacking integrated learning model with four single machine learning regression models. Findings indicated that the stacking integrated learning regression model fitted better and had good stability; on the test set, the stacking integrated learning regression model showed a relative increase of 8.2% in R2, a relative decrease of 14.0% in RMSE, and a relative increase of 6.5% in RPD when compared to the RF model, which was the single most effective machine learning regression model, and the stacking model was able to achieve soil salinity inversion more accurately. The soil salinity in the oasis areas of the Manas River Basin tended to decrease from north to south from 2016 to 2020 from a spatial point of view, and it was reduced in April from a temporal point of view. The percentage of pixels with a high soil salinity content of 2.75–2.80 g kg−1 in the study area had decreased by 19.6% in April 2020 compared to April 2016. The innovatively constructed stacking integrated learning regression model improved the accuracy of soil salinity estimation on the basis of the superior results obtained in the training of the single optimal machine learning regression model. As a consequence, this model can provide technological backup for fast monitoring and inversion of soil salinity as well as prevention and containment of salinization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Soils)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of oasis areas and sampling sites in the Manas River Basin (Coordinate system: WGS1984, Datum: WGS84).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Principle of the stacking integrated learning regression model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Research technology roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation between spectral index and soil salinity. Note: * Indicates that the correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Prediction results for RF, BPNN, CNN, and SVR ((<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) are the prediction results for the RF, BPNN, CNN, and SVR training set and (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) are the prediction results for the RF, BPNN, CNN, and SVR test set, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Prediction results for RF, BPNN, CNN, and SVR ((<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) are the prediction results for the RF, BPNN, CNN, and SVR training set and (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) are the prediction results for the RF, BPNN, CNN, and SVR test set, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatter plot of measured and predicted values of a stacking integrated learning regression model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Performance evaluation of stacking integrated learning, RF, BPNN, CNN, and SVR regression models. Note: The left figure is the training set and the right figure is the test set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of soil salinity in April and October 2016–2020 ((<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) were for April 2016–2020; (<b>f</b>–<b>j</b>) were for October 2016–2020). Note: Pie charts were regional shares of salinity content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Soil salinity content over time.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 15200 KiB  
Article
Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data to Improve Satellite Inversion: A Study on Soil Salinity
by Ruiliang Liu, Keli Jia, Haoyu Li and Junhua Zhang
Land 2024, 13(9), 1438; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091438 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 547
Abstract
The accurate and extensive monitoring of soil salinization is essential for sustainable agricultural development. It is difficult for single remote sensing data (satellite, unmanned aerial vehicle) to simultaneously meet the requirements of wide-scale and high-precision soil salinity monitoring. Therefore, this paper adopts the [...] Read more.
The accurate and extensive monitoring of soil salinization is essential for sustainable agricultural development. It is difficult for single remote sensing data (satellite, unmanned aerial vehicle) to simultaneously meet the requirements of wide-scale and high-precision soil salinity monitoring. Therefore, this paper adopts the upscaling method to upscale the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data to the same pixel size as the satellite data. Based on the optimally upscaled UAV data, the satellite model was corrected using the numerical regression fitting method to improve the inversion accuracy of the satellite model. The results showed that the accuracy of the original UAV soil salinity inversion model (R2 = 0.893, RMSE = 1.448) was higher than that of the original satellite model (R2 = 0.630, RMSE = 2.255). The satellite inversion model corrected with UAV data had an accuracy of R2 = 0.787, RMSE = 2.043, and R2 improved by 0.157. The effect of satellite inversion correction was verified using a UAV inversion salt distribution map, and it was found that the same rate of salt distribution was improved from 75.771% before correction to 90.774% after correction. Therefore, the use of UAV fusion correction of satellite data can realize the requirements from a small range of UAV to a large range of satellite data and from low precision before correction to high precision after correction. It provides an effective technical reference for the precise monitoring of soil salinity and the sustainable development of large-scale agriculture. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of the study area and distribution of sampling points in the test area. Note: Location of the Ningxia, China (<b>a</b>); Location of the Pingluo County, Ningxia (<b>b</b>); Location of the research area (<b>c</b>); Review drawing number: GS (2019)1822.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Five-point method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Level of soil salinization in the test areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>UAV image upscaling results in Test Area 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spectral reflectance changes in UAV images after upscaling by different methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Variable importance projection (<span class="html-italic">VIP</span>) analysis between soil salinity and spectral indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Hyperparameter optimization process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Inversion of soil salinity before and after model calibration of satellite images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of soil salinity distribution in Test Area 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Level of distribution of soil salinity inversion.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4444 KiB  
Article
Weighted Variable Optimization-Based Method for Estimating Soil Salinity Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data: A Case Study in the Weiku Oasis, Xinjiang, China
by Zhuohan Jiang, Zhe Hao, Jianli Ding, Zhiguo Miao, Yukun Zhang, Alimira Alimu, Xin Jin, Huiling Cheng and Wen Ma
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(17), 3145; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173145 - 26 Aug 2024
Viewed by 934
Abstract
Soil salinization is a significant global threat to sustainable agricultural development, with soil salinity serving as a crucial indicator for evaluating soil salinization. Remote sensing technology enables large-scale inversion of soil salinity, facilitating the monitoring and assessment of soil salinization levels, thus supporting [...] Read more.
Soil salinization is a significant global threat to sustainable agricultural development, with soil salinity serving as a crucial indicator for evaluating soil salinization. Remote sensing technology enables large-scale inversion of soil salinity, facilitating the monitoring and assessment of soil salinization levels, thus supporting the prevention and management of soil salinization. This study employs multi-source remote sensing data, selecting 8 radar polarization combinations, 10 spectral indices, and 3 topographic factors to form a feature variable dataset. By applying a normalized weighted variable optimization method, highly important feature variables are identified. AdaBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost machine learning methods are then used to develop soil salinity inversion models and evaluate their performance. The results indicate the following: (1) There is generally a strong correlation between radar polarization combinations and vegetation indices, and a very high correlation between various vegetation indices and the salinity index S3. (2) The top five feature variables, in order of importance, are Aspect, VH2, Normalized Difference Moisture Index (NDMI), VH, and Vegetation Moisture Index (VMI). (3) The method of normalized weighted importance scoring effectively screens important variables, reducing the number of input feature variables while enhancing the model’s inversion accuracy. (4) Among the three machine learning models, CatBoost performs best overall in soil salt content (SSC) prediction. Combined with the top five feature variables, CatBoost achieves the highest prediction accuracy (R2 = 0.831, RMSE = 2.653, MAE = 1.034) in the prediction phase. This study provides insights for the further development and application of methods for collaborative inversion of soil salinity using multi-source remote sensing data. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The location of Xinjiang in China. (<b>b</b>) The location of the Weiku Oasis in Xinjiang. (<b>c</b>) Land use types and distribution of sampling points in the research area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Methodology flow diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Descriptive statistics of soil sample salinity content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation analysis between variables.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Results of importance scoring of feature variables. (<b>a</b>) RFE Score. (<b>b</b>) RF Score. (<b>c</b>) VIP Score.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Weighted importance score ranking of characteristic variables.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of evaluation metrics for inverse models. (<b>a</b>) Validation set R<sup>2</sup>. (<b>b</b>) Validation set RMSE. (<b>c</b>) Validation set MAE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatterplots of measured SSC and predicted SSC for different model validation sets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SSC inversion results for the Weiku Oasis in June 2022 using the CatBoost model.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 9669 KiB  
Article
Research on Ground-Based Remote-Sensing Inversion Method for Soil Salinity Information Based on Crack Characteristics and Spectral Response
by Xiaozhen Liu, Zhuopeng Zhang, Mingxuan Lu, Yifan Wang and Jianhua Ren
Agronomy 2024, 14(8), 1837; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081837 - 20 Aug 2024
Viewed by 558
Abstract
The precise quantification of soil salinity and the spatial distribution are paramount for proficiently managing and remediating salinized soils. This study aims to explore a pioneering methodology for forecasting soil salinity by combining the spectroscopy of soda saline–alkali soil with crack characteristics, thereby [...] Read more.
The precise quantification of soil salinity and the spatial distribution are paramount for proficiently managing and remediating salinized soils. This study aims to explore a pioneering methodology for forecasting soil salinity by combining the spectroscopy of soda saline–alkali soil with crack characteristics, thereby facilitating the ground-based remote-sensing inversion of soil salinity. To attain this objective, a surface cracking experiment was meticulously conducted under controlled indoor conditions for 57 soda saline–alkali soil samples from the Songnen Plain of China. The quantitative parameters for crack characterization, encompassing the length and area of desiccation cracks, together with the contrast texture feature were methodically derived. Furthermore, spectral reflectance of the cracked soil surface was measured. A structural equation model (SEM) was then employed for the estimation of soil salt parameters, including electrical conductivity (EC1:5), Na+, pH, HCO3, CO32−, and the total salinity. The investigation unveiled notable associations between different salt parameters and crack attributes, alongside spectral reflectance measurements (r = 0.52–0.95), yet both clay content and mineralogy had little effect on the cracking process due to its low activity index. In addition, the presence of desiccation cracks accentuated the overall spectral contrast of salt-affected soil samples. The application of SEMs facilitated the concurrent prediction of multiple soil salt parameters alongside the regression analysis for individual salt parameters. Nonetheless, this study confers the advantage of the swift synchronous observation of multiple salt parameters whilst furnishing lucid interpretation and pragmatic utility. This study helps us to explore the mechanism of soil salinity on the surface cracking of soda saline–alkali soil in the Songnen Plain of China, and it also provides an effective solution for quickly and accurately predicting soil salt content using crack characteristics, which also provides a new perspective for the hyperspectral measurement of saline–alkali soils. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of research area and sampling points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The standardized measurements of photography and spectroscopy of cracked soil samples. (<b>a</b>). Measurement process; (<b>b</b>). Crack pattern; (<b>c</b>). Image of calibration plate; (<b>d</b>). Area of spectral irradiation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The preprocessing process of crack images. (<b>a</b>). Cropped crack image; (<b>b</b>). Grayscale crack image; (<b>c</b>). Binary crack image; (<b>d</b>). Skeletonized crack image.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SEM schematic diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spectral characteristics of 11 soil samples with different soil salinity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlograms between reflectance and main soil properties of soil samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The results of fitting measured and predicted values of a single dependent variable by SEM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The results of fitting measured and predicted values of a multiple dependent variables by SEM.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4658 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Impact of Brackish Water on Soil Salinization with Time-Lapse Inversion of Electromagnetic Induction Data
by Lorenzo De Carlo and Mohammad Farzamian
Land 2024, 13(7), 961; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13070961 - 30 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1094
Abstract
Over the last decade, electromagnetic induction (EMI) measurements have been increasingly used for investigating soil salinization caused by the use of brackish or saline water as an irrigation source. EMI measurements proved to be a powerful tool for providing spatial information on the [...] Read more.
Over the last decade, electromagnetic induction (EMI) measurements have been increasingly used for investigating soil salinization caused by the use of brackish or saline water as an irrigation source. EMI measurements proved to be a powerful tool for providing spatial information on the investigated soil because of the correlation between the output geophysical parameter, i.e., the electrical conductivity, to soil moisture and salinity. In addition, their non-invasive nature and their capability to collect a high amount of data over broad areas and in a relatively short time makes these measurements attractive for monitoring flow and transport dynamics, which are otherwise undetectable with conventional measurements. In an experimental field, EMI measurements were collected during the growth season of tomatoes and irrigated with three different irrigation strategies. Time-lapse data were collected over three months in order to visualize changes in electrical conductivity associated with soil salinity. A rigorous time-lapse inversion procedure was set for modeling the soil salinization induced by brackish irrigation water. A clear soil response in terms of an increase in electrical conductivity (EC) in the upper soil layer confirmed the reliability of the geophysical tool to predict soil salinization trends. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Salinity Monitoring and Modelling at Different Scales)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Basics of ECa measurements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Normalized cumulative sensitivity (CS) for the three Mini-Explorer sensors S1, S2, and S3: (<b>a</b>) VCP configuration and (<b>b</b>) HCP coil configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of ECa data collected in the experimental field. The soil sampling was carried out on 31st August during the last EMI campaign.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Inverted EC for the transect corresponding to plot A at five different time points: (<b>a</b>) 26th June; (<b>b</b>) 10th July; (<b>c</b>) 24th July; (<b>d</b>) 6th August; and (<b>e</b>) 31st August.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Inverted EC differences over time for plot A after (<b>a</b>) 14 days; (<b>b</b>) 28 days; (<b>c</b>) 41 days; and (<b>d</b>) 66 days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Observed vs. calculated data for each time point observation for plot A: (<b>a</b>) 26th June; (<b>b</b>) 10th July; (<b>c</b>) 24th July; (<b>d</b>) 6th August; and (<b>e</b>) 31st August.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Inverted EC for the transect corresponding to plot B at five different time points: (<b>a</b>) 26th June; (<b>b</b>) 10th July; (<b>c</b>) 24th July; (<b>d</b>) 6th August; and (<b>e</b>) 31st August.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Inverted EC differences over time for plot B after (<b>a</b>) 14 days; (<b>b</b>) 28 days; (<b>c</b>) 41 days; and (<b>d</b>) 66 days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Inverted EC for transect belonging to plot C at five different time points: (<b>a</b>) 26th June; (<b>b</b>) 10th July; (<b>c</b>) 24th July; (<b>d</b>) 6th August; and (<b>e</b>) 31st August.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Inverted EC differences over time for plot C after (<b>a</b>) 14 days; (<b>b</b>) 28 days; (<b>c</b>) 41 days; and (<b>d</b>) 66 days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Inverted EC vs. ECe calibration function. Statistically significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value significance level: *** 0.001 levels of significance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Changes in EC at the end of the irrigation season for (<b>a</b>) plot A; (<b>b</b>) plot B; and (<b>c</b>) plot C.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 6425 KiB  
Article
Feature Selection and Regression Models for Multisource Data-Based Soil Salinity Prediction: A Case Study of Minqin Oasis in Arid China
by Sheshu Zhang, Jun Zhao, Jianxia Yang, Jinfeng Xie and Ziyun Sun
Land 2024, 13(6), 877; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060877 - 18 Jun 2024
Viewed by 875
Abstract
(1) Monitoring salinized soil in saline–alkali land is essential, requiring regional-scale soil salinity inversion. This study aims to identify sensitive variables for predicting electrical conductivity (EC) in soil, focusing on effective feature selection methods. (2) The study systematically selects a feature subset from [...] Read more.
(1) Monitoring salinized soil in saline–alkali land is essential, requiring regional-scale soil salinity inversion. This study aims to identify sensitive variables for predicting electrical conductivity (EC) in soil, focusing on effective feature selection methods. (2) The study systematically selects a feature subset from Sentinel-1 C SAR, Sentinel-2 MSI, and SRTM DEM data. Various feature selection methods (correlation analysis, LASSO, RFE, and GRA) are employed on 79 variables. Regression models using random forest regression (RF) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) algorithms are constructed and compared. (3) The results highlight the effectiveness of the RFE algorithm in reducing model complexity. The model incorporates significant environmental factors like soil moisture, topography, and soil texture, which play an important role in modeling. Combining the method with RF improved soil salinity prediction (R2 = 0.71, RMSE = 1.47, RPD = 1.84). Overall, salinization in Minqin oasis soils was evident, especially in the unutilized land at the edge of the oasis. (4) Integrating data from different sources to construct characterization variables overcomes the limitations of a single data source. Variable selection is an effective means to address the redundancy of variable information, providing insights into feature engineering and variable selection for soil salinity estimation in arid and semi-arid regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart of the research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Study area and spatial distribution of soil samples. (<b>a</b>) Location of the study area in China. (<b>b</b>) Distribution of soil texture types in the study area, obtained from the HWSD database. (<b>c</b>) Distribution of different land use types and sampling points, obtained from the CNLUCC database released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of the WCM model before and after processing. VH and VV are the backscattering coefficients corresponding to the different polarization modes of the original, and WCMVN and WCMVV are the backscattering coefficients of the former after the water cloud model (WCM) treatment, respectively. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) are the comparison of the backscatter coefficients VH and VV with the results processed by the water cloud model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sample distribution. (<b>a</b>) The total distribution of samples and the distribution of calibration and validation sets, where N denotes the total number of samples, SD is the standard deviation, and CV is the coefficient of variation. (<b>b</b>) Distribution of all samples under different land uses, where N represents the number of sample points in each group.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variable correlation analysis. (<b>a</b>) Result of Kendall, Spearman, and Pearson correlation analysis of 79 variables. (<b>b</b>) Result of Pearson correlation analysis of 34 variables after screening.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>RFE algorithm model selection and results of three feature selection algorithms. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) are accuracy comparison charts for selecting linear models, RF models, SVM models, and Treebag models for RFE variable selection, respectively. (<b>c</b>–<b>e</b>) are the characteristic variables and their importance maps obtained after variable selection using Elastic Net, GRA, and RFE algorithms, respectively. (<b>f</b>) is a comparison chart of the results obtained by the three variable selection algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Independent validation results for six models. The gray dashed line represents the 1:1 line, and the purple (violet) solid line is the fitted line between predicted and observed values; the 1:1 line provides a reference for the deviation of predicted from observed values. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) Scatter plots representing six models: RFE-PLSR, RFE-RF, GRA-PLSR, GRA-RF, Elastic-PLSR, and ElasticScatter plots representing six models: RFE-PLSR, RFE-RF, GRA-PLSR, GRA-RF, Elastic-PLSR, and Elastic-RF-RF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Independent validation results of the RFE_RF model versus the model without variable selection and the model with polarization combination features removed. (<b>a</b>) Scatterplot of validation results for RFE_RF model. (<b>b</b>) Scatterplot of model constructed using all variables without variable selection. (<b>c</b>) Scatterplot of the model constructed using the removal of microwave data variables. (<b>d</b>) Predictions of the three models in (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) versus actual soil conductivity values. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) The gray dashed line represents the 1:1 line, and the red line represents the fitting line between the predicted value and the observed value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison between the results of the spatial distribution of soil salinity in Minqin oasis predicted by using the RFE-RF model and those in the HWSD database. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) are, respectively, the spatial distribution results of soil electrical conductivity obtained using the RFE-RF model and the spatial distribution of soil electrical conductivity in the study area provided by the HWSD database. (<b>c</b>) is the result after dividing soil conductivity into 4 categories. Since there is no EC value higher than 16 dS∙m<sup>−1</sup> in the prediction results, the fifth category of extremely saline soils does not exist. (<b>d</b>) is the condition of cultivated land affected by salinization (EC &gt; 2 dS∙m<sup>−1</sup>). (<b>e</b>) is the soil condition of Qingtu Lake and nearby.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3213 KiB  
Article
Influences of Vegetation Rehabilitation on Soil Infiltrability and Root Morphological Characteristics in Coastal Saline Soil
by Linlin Chu, Si Yuan, Dan Chen, Yaohu Kang, Hiba Shaghaleh, Mohamed A. El-Tayeb, Mohamed S. Sheteiwy and Yousef Alhaj Hamoud
Land 2024, 13(6), 849; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060849 - 14 Jun 2024
Viewed by 763
Abstract
Soil’s hydraulic properties are an essential characteristic that influences the hydrologic cycle by influencing infiltration and runoff and the transport of soil water and salt in the process of vegetation rehabilitation in coastal saline soils. To date, few studies have specifically addressed the [...] Read more.
Soil’s hydraulic properties are an essential characteristic that influences the hydrologic cycle by influencing infiltration and runoff and the transport of soil water and salt in the process of vegetation rehabilitation in coastal saline soils. To date, few studies have specifically addressed the soil’s hydraulic properties and root–soil interactions of coastal saline soil under revegetation. This study aimed to identify the unique hydraulic characteristics of soil, the pore size distribution parameter, Gardner α, and the different contributions of soil’s physical properties and vegetation’s root morphological characteristics with regard to soil infiltration. For this purpose, disc infiltration experiments at different pressure heads were performed on three vegetation types, Salix matsudana (SM), Hibiscus syriacus (HC), and Sabina vulgaris (SV), after two years of vegetation rehabilitation. The results demonstrated that the initial and steady infiltration rate, Gardner α, and soil porosity fraction exhibit significant differences among the three plant species. A correlation analysis indicated that the soil water content, surface area, density, and dry weight of roots had inverse relationships with soil infiltration at heads of pressure of 0 cm and 9 cm. The regulation of soil infiltration was influenced by the root dry weight and root average diameter, which played crucial roles in determining the roots’ morphological properties and the formation of pathways and soil pores. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of inset map of studied plot, photo of ecosystems, and picture of soil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Plan view of the sample plot, including information on the soil and root core collection locations (<b>a</b>); a three-dimensional view of subplot a, including information on the sample plot survey and sampling depth (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variation in infiltration rate with time for <span class="html-italic">Salix matsudana</span>-grass (SM), <span class="html-italic">Hibiscus syriacus</span>-grass (HC), and <span class="html-italic">Sabina vulgaris</span> (SV).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of different infiltration parameters among <span class="html-italic">Salix matsudana</span>-<span class="html-italic">grass</span> (SM), <span class="html-italic">Hibiscus syriacus</span>-<span class="html-italic">grass</span> (HC), and <span class="html-italic">Sabina vulgaris</span> (SV). Different lower-case letters above bars indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01) among plant species under the same negative pressure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Changes in the contribution of each class of pore to flow under three vegetation types. The same lowercase letters in the same pore class indicate a significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. Different capital letters in the same column under the same vegetation restoration type indicate a significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in root characteristics of different vegetation types at different soil depths. (<b>a</b>) root surf area; (<b>b</b>) root average diameter; (<b>c</b>) root length density; (<b>d</b>) root volume; (<b>e</b>) root dry weight.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Pearson correlations for infiltration rates, soil physical properties, and plant root characteristics. IIR0 and IIR9, initial infiltration rate at pressure heads of 0 cm and 9 cm, respectively; SIR0 and IIR9, steady infiltration rate at pressure heads of 0 cm and 9 cm, respectively; Ks, saturated hydraulic conductivity; K9, hydraulic conductivity at pressure heads of 9 cm; BD, soil bulk density matter; SWC, soil moisture content; EC, soil electric conductivity; SA, root surface area; AD, root average diameter; LD, root length density; RV, root volume; DW, root dry weight. Indicated values represent the correlation coefficients. The blue color indicates a positive correlation, and the red color indicates a negative correlation at significant levels of * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 11155 KiB  
Article
Determining Drought and Salinity Stress Response Function for Garlic
by Jean Bosco Nana, Hassan M. Abd El Baki and Haruyuki Fujimaki
Soil Syst. 2024, 8(2), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8020059 - 28 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1165
Abstract
Garlic (Allium sativum L.) is an important crop cultivated in arid and semi-arid climates. To quantify the tolerance of garlic to drought and salinity stresses in terms of parameter values of the stress response function, we conducted pot experiments in a greenhouse [...] Read more.
Garlic (Allium sativum L.) is an important crop cultivated in arid and semi-arid climates. To quantify the tolerance of garlic to drought and salinity stresses in terms of parameter values of the stress response function, we conducted pot experiments in a greenhouse for two years. Nine 1/5000a Wagner pots were used for three treatments, namely drought-treated, salinity-treated, and control pots, for estimating the relative transpiration. Daily transpiration rates were observed by weighing pots, and the soil surface of each pot was covered. The soil water contents were measured hourly using two soil moisture probes for drought-treated pots, and two salinity probes for both soil water content and bulk electrical conductivity were monitored for salinity-treated pots. When the ratio of actual to potential transpiration fell below 50%, the root length distributions were obtained by dismantling the pots. The parameter values for both drought-stress and salinity-stress functions were estimated using inverse-analysis and bulk-analysis methods. The parameter values of drought-stress and salinity-stress functions obtained by the simpler and cheaper bulk method gave similar results to the inverse method when the root length distributions were relatively uniform. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crop Response to Soil and Water Salinity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Time evolutions of relative transpiration for stress-treated pots and average potential transpiration rate for control pots: (<b>a</b>) 2022, and (<b>b</b>) 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Time evolutions of soil moisture inverse method and intermediate soil moisture (bulk) in drought-treated pots: (<b>a</b>) 2022 and (<b>b</b>) 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variation in soil moisture and electrical conductivity of soil solution at 4.3 and 14.25 cm depth and bulk EC for (<b>a</b>) S2 and (<b>b</b>) S3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Profiles of normalized root length distribution for drought-treated pots: (<b>a</b>) 2022 and (<b>b</b>) 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Profiles of normalized root length distribution for salinity-treated pots in 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Drought stress response functions for garlic: (<b>a</b>) 2022 and (<b>b</b>) 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Drought stress response function for garlic in 2023 for Tottori sand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Salinity stress response function for garlic in 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of measured and optimized <span class="html-italic">τ</span>/<span class="html-italic">τ<sub>p</sub></span> for (<b>a</b>) drought-treated pots in 2022 and (<b>b</b>) drought-treated and salinity-treated pots in 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of measured and optimized <span class="html-italic">τ</span>/<span class="html-italic">τ<sub>p</sub></span> for drought stress of S2 in 2023.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 4356 KiB  
Article
Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of the Literature on the Remote Sensing Inversion of Soil Salinization from 2000 to 2023
by Chengshen Yin, Quanming Liu, Teng Ma, Yanru Shi and Fuqiang Wang
Land 2024, 13(5), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050659 - 11 May 2024
Viewed by 1267
Abstract
Tracing the historical development of soil salinization and monitoring its current status are crucial for understanding the driving forces behind it, proposing strategies to improve soil quality, and predicting future trends. To comprehensively understand the evolution of research on the remote sensing inversion [...] Read more.
Tracing the historical development of soil salinization and monitoring its current status are crucial for understanding the driving forces behind it, proposing strategies to improve soil quality, and predicting future trends. To comprehensively understand the evolution of research on the remote sensing inversion of soil salinity, a scientific bibliometric analysis was conducted on research from the past two decades indexed in the core scientific databases. This article analyzes the field from various perspectives, including the number of publications, authors, research institutions and countries, research fields, study areas, and keywords, in order to reveal the current state-of-the-art and cutting-edge research in this domain. Special attention was given to topics such as machine learning, data assimilation methods, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing technology, soil inversion under vegetation cover, salt ion inversion, and remote sensing model construction methods. The results indicate an overall increase in the volume of publications, with key authors such as Metternicht, Gi and Zhao, Gengxing, and major research institutions including the International Institute for Geoinformatics Science and Earth Observation and the Chinese Academy of Sciences making significant contributions. Notably, China and the USA have made substantial contributions to this field, with research areas extending from Inner Mongolia’s Hetao irrigation district to the Mediterranean region. Research in the remote sensing domain focuses on various methods, including hyperspectral imaging for salinized soil inversion, with an increasing emphasis on machine learning. This study enriches researchers’ knowledge of the current trends and future directions of remote sensing inversion of soil salinization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Salinity Monitoring and Modelling at Different Scales)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Number of scientific publications on remote sensing inversion of soil salinity from 2000 to 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Collaborative network of authors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The visual representation of institutional networks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Pie chart of document volume by country.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Graph depicting international collaboration among nations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The main areas of study for soil salinization and its relationships via remote sensing monitoring.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Co-occurrence graph of keywords.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Keyword burst graph (The red part is the year in which the keyword appears).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 8170 KiB  
Article
Influence of Supraglacial Lakes on Accuracy of Inversion of Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Melt Data in Different Passive Microwave Bands
by Qian Li, Che Wang, Lu An and Minghu Ding
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(10), 1673; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101673 - 9 May 2024
Viewed by 920
Abstract
The occurrence of Supraglacial Lakes (SGLs) may influence the signals acquired with microwave radiometers, which may result in a degree of uncertainty when employing microwave radiometer data for the detection of surface melt. Accurate monitoring of surface melting requires a reasonable assessment of [...] Read more.
The occurrence of Supraglacial Lakes (SGLs) may influence the signals acquired with microwave radiometers, which may result in a degree of uncertainty when employing microwave radiometer data for the detection of surface melt. Accurate monitoring of surface melting requires a reasonable assessment of this uncertainty. However, there is a scarcity of research in this field. Therefore, in this study, we computed surface melt in the vicinity of Automatic Weather Stations (AWSs) by employing Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) Ka-band data and Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite L-band data and extracted SGL pixels by utilizing Sentinel-2 data. A comparison between surface melt results derived from AWS air temperature estimates and those obtained with remote sensing inversion in the two different bands was conducted for sites below the mean snowline elevation during the summers of 2016 to 2020. Compared with sites with no SGLs, the commission error (CO) of DMSP morning and evening data at sites where these water bodies were present increased by 36% and 30%, respectively, and the number of days with CO increased by 12 and 3 days, respectively. The omission error (OM) of SMOS morning and evening data increased by 33% and 32%, respectively, and the number of days with OM increased by 17 and 21 days, respectively. Identifying the source of error is a prerequisite for the improvement of surface melt algorithms, for which this study provides a basis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effective days with passive microwave data. (<b>a</b>) DMSP morning data; (<b>b</b>) DMSP evening data; (<b>c</b>) SMOS morning data; (<b>d</b>) SMOS evening data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The distribution of the AWSs on the GrIS. The green dots represent the sites; the gray line represents the boundary line of the watershed; and the background color shows the elevation, with blue for low values and red for high values. The GrIS is divided into eight basins: northern (N), northwestern (NW), northeastern (NE), west-central (CW), east-central (CE), southwestern (SW), southeastern (SE), and southern (S).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Number of valid days with MODIS ice surface temperature data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Technical flowchart of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Melt days and overall accuracy of DMSP data. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) represent the melt days of DMSP morning and evening data, respectively, in spring, summer, and autumn (2011–2020); (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) denote the OA values of DMSP morning and evening data, respectively, in spring, summer, autumn, and winter. The blank areas indicate NaN values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Melt days and overall accuracy of SMOS data. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) represent the number of melt days according to SMOS morning and evening data, respectively, in spring, summer, autumn, and winter (2011 to 2020); (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) indicate the OA values according to SMOS morning and evening data, respectively, in spring, summer, autumn, and winter, with the blank areas denoting NaN values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Extraction results of SGL water body pixels. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) represent Sentinel-2 summer synthetic images from 2016 to 2020, respectively, allocated in grids (25 km × 25 km) where AWSs (UPE_U, JAR, KAN_M, KAN_M, and JAR, respectively) were situated. (<b>f</b>–<b>j</b>) depict water body extraction outcomes of Sentinel-2 images at corresponding grids from 2016 to 2020, respectively. Green dot: center of the grid where AWS is positioned; red boundary: 14 km buffer in the center of the grid; dark blue area: water body pixels; light blue section: non-water body pixels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Number of water body pixels per day during the summer of 2016 in a grid where UPE_U was located. The horizontal coordinate represents the day of the year, and the vertical coordinate represents the number of water body pixels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Sample point selection. (<b>a</b>) A synthetic image relative to the 2016 Sentinel-2 summer season within the grid where Swiss Camp was situated; the green point represents the center of the grid, the red point signifies the selected sample point, the red boundary denotes the 14 km buffer zone in the center of the grid, the blue boundary represents the artificially mapped boundary of the SGLs, and the yellow boundary indicates the 200 m buffer zone. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) depict magnified views of the two SGLs in Figure (<b>a</b>), respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Number of SGL water body pixels (right y-axis) with the difference between brightness temperature and melting threshold data (left y-axis) based on surface melt indicated by DMSP data, categorized into true negatives, true positives, commission error, and omission error. (<b>a</b>) DMSP morning data; (<b>b</b>) DMSP evening data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The number of SGL water bodies (right y-axis) and the difference between the actual LWC and the model 0.2% LWC (left y-axis) for surface melt are indicated by the SMOS data as truly negative, truly positive, misclassified, and overlooked. (<b>a</b>) SMOS morning data; (<b>b</b>) SMOS evening data.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 18409 KiB  
Article
Soil Salinity Inversion in Yellow River Delta by Regularized Extreme Learning Machine Based on ICOA
by Jiajie Wang, Xiaopeng Wang, Jiahua Zhang, Xiaodi Shang, Yuyi Chen, Yiping Feng and Bingbing Tian
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(9), 1565; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16091565 - 28 Apr 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1044
Abstract
Soil salinization has seriously affected agricultural production and ecological balance in the Yellow River Delta region. Rapid and accurate monitoring of soil salinity has become an urgent need. Traditional machine learning models tend to fall into local optimal values during the learning process, [...] Read more.
Soil salinization has seriously affected agricultural production and ecological balance in the Yellow River Delta region. Rapid and accurate monitoring of soil salinity has become an urgent need. Traditional machine learning models tend to fall into local optimal values during the learning process, which reduces their accuracy. This paper introduces Circle map to enhance the crayfish optimization algorithm (COA), which is then integrated with the regularized extreme learning machine (RELM) model, aiming to improve the accuracy of soil salinity content (SSC) inversion in the Yellow River Delta region. We employed Landsat5 TM remote sensing images and measured salinity data to develop spectral indices, such as the band index, salinity index, vegetation index, and comprehensive index, selecting the optimal modeling variable group through Pearson correlation analysis and variable projection importance analysis. The back propagation neural network (BPNN), RELM, and improved crayfish optimization algorithm–regularized extreme learning machine (ICOA-RELM) models were constructed using measured data and selected variable groups for SSC inversion. The results indicate that the ICOA-RELM model enhances the R2 value by an average of about 0.1 compared to other models, particularly those using groups of variables filtered by variable projection importance analysis as input variables, which showed the best inversion effect (test set R2 value of 0.75, MAE of 0.198, RMSE of 0.249). The SSC inversion results indicate a higher salinization degree in the coastal regions of the Yellow River Delta and a lower degree in the inland areas, with moderate saline soil and severe saline soil comprising 48.69% of the total area. These results are consistent with the actual sampling results, which verify the practicability of the model. This paper’s methods and findings introduce an innovative and practical tool for monitoring and managing salinized soils in the Yellow River Delta, offering significant theoretical and practical benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Earth Observation and Geosciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area and sampling point location distribution map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Preprocessing of the Landsat5 TM remote sensing image for Yellow River Delta. All images above are false color composite images. (<b>a</b>) The original remote sensing image; (<b>b</b>) the remote sensing image after radiometric calibration; (<b>c</b>) the remote sensing image after atmospheric correction; (<b>d</b>) the remote sensing image after data cropping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>ICOA-RELM model architecture diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The working flowchart of this paper.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Heat maps of Pearson correlation analysis between four spectral indices and SSC: (<b>a</b>) band indices; (<b>b</b>) salinity indices; (<b>c</b>) vegetation indices; (<b>d</b>) composite indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Characteristic importance values for all spectral indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Scatter plots of measured and estimated SSC based on different models for different input variable groups. (<b>a</b>) BP-PCC; (<b>b</b>) BP-VIP; (<b>c</b>) BP-TV; (<b>d</b>) RELM-PCC; (<b>e</b>) RELM-VIP; (<b>f</b>) RELM-TV; (<b>g</b>) ICOA-RELM-PCC; (<b>h</b>) ICOA-RELM-VIP; (<b>i</b>) ICOA-RELM-TV. The red line is the fitting line between the measured and predicted values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution map of soil salinity.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 10072 KiB  
Article
Multi-Model Comprehensive Inversion of Surface Soil Moisture from Landsat Images Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
by Weitao Lv, Xiasong Hu, Xilai Li, Jimei Zhao, Changyi Liu, Shuaifei Li, Guorong Li and Haili Zhu
Sustainability 2024, 16(9), 3509; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093509 - 23 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1321
Abstract
Soil moisture plays an important role in maintaining ecosystem stability and sustainable development, especially for the upper reaches of the Yellow River region. Therefore, accurately and conveniently monitoring soil moisture has become the focus of scholars. This study combines three machine learning algorithms: [...] Read more.
Soil moisture plays an important role in maintaining ecosystem stability and sustainable development, especially for the upper reaches of the Yellow River region. Therefore, accurately and conveniently monitoring soil moisture has become the focus of scholars. This study combines three machine learning algorithms: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and back propagation neural network (BPNN)—with the traditional monitoring of soil moisture using remote sensing indices to construct a more accurate soil moisture inversion model. To enhance the accuracy of the soil moisture inversion model, 27 environmental variables were screened and grouped, including vegetation index, salinity index, and surface temperature, to determine the optimal combination of variables. The results show that screening the optimal independent variables in the Xijitan landslide distribution area lowered the root mean square error (RMSE) of the RF model by 16.95%. Of the constructed models, the combined model shows the best applicability, with the highest R2 of 0.916 and the lowest RMSE of 0.877% with the test dataset; the further research shows that the BPNN model achieved higher overall accuracy than the other two individual models, with the test set R2 being 0.809 and the RMSE 0.875%. The results of this study can provide a theoretical reference for the effective use of Landsat satellite data to monitor the spatial and temporal distribution of and change in soil water content on the two sides of the upper Yellow River basin under vegetation cover. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic location of the study area: a(1) is Qinghai Province, a(2) is the Yellow River Basin, b is Guide and Jianzha counties, c(1) is the Xiazangtan landslide distribution area, c(2) is the Xijitan landslide distribution area, and d is the sampling site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow of variable optimization and model construction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results of correlation coefficient analysis between environmental variables and surface soil moisture in the Xijitan (<b>a</b>) and Xiazangtan (<b>b</b>) landslide distribution areas. Note: “*” in the graph indicates significance <span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Importance analysis of environmental variables in the two different landslide distribution areas of Xijitan and Xiazangtan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Optimal independent variable combinations and their accuracy validation results in the distribution area of the Xijitan landslide area. Note: In the table, <span class="html-italic">R</span><sup>2</sup> is the coefficient of determination; RMSE is the root mean square error; MAE is the mean absolute error; MBE is the mean bias error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Optimal independent variable combinations and their accuracy validation results in the distribution area of the Xiazangtan landslide area. Note: <span class="html-italic">R</span><sup>2</sup>, RMSE, MAE, and MBE in the table are the same as in <a href="#sustainability-16-03509-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comprehensive comparison results of the accuracy of the validation set of soil moisture inversion models in two different landslide distribution areas: (<b>a</b>) Xijitan landslide distribution area, (<b>b</b>) Xiazangtan landslide distribution area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Comprehensive comparison results of the accuracy of the validation set of soil moisture inversion models in two different landslide distribution areas: (<b>a</b>) Xijitan landslide distribution area, (<b>b</b>) Xiazangtan landslide distribution area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Characteristics of the spatial distribution of surface soil moisture in two different landslide distribution areas in China: (<b>a</b>) Xijitan landslide distribution area, (<b>b</b>) Xiazangtan landslide distribution area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comprehensive comparison results of the accuracy of different model validation sets in the distribution area of the Xijitan landslide: (<b>a</b>) RF model, (<b>b</b>) SVM model, (<b>c</b>) BPNN model, (<b>d</b>) combined model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Comprehensive comparison results of the accuracy of different model validation sets in the distribution area of the Xijitan landslide: (<b>a</b>) RF model, (<b>b</b>) SVM model, (<b>c</b>) BPNN model, (<b>d</b>) combined model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Characteristics of the spatial distribution of soil moisture in the distribution area of Xijitan landslide: (<b>a</b>) RF model, (<b>b</b>) SVM model, (<b>c</b>) BPNN model, (<b>d</b>) combined model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Characteristics of the spatial distribution of soil moisture in the distribution area of Xijitan landslide: (<b>a</b>) RF model, (<b>b</b>) SVM model, (<b>c</b>) BPNN model, (<b>d</b>) combined model.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 4615 KiB  
Article
Spatio-Temporal Variation Analysis of Soil Salinization in the Ougan-Kuqa River Oasis of China
by Danying Du, Baozhong He, Xuefeng Luo, Shilong Ma, Yaning Song and Wen Yang
Sustainability 2024, 16(7), 2706; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072706 - 25 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1032
Abstract
In order to investigate the mechanism of environmental factors in soil salinization, this study focused on analyzing the temporal-spatial variation of soil salinity in the Ogan-Kuqa River Oasis in Xinjiang, China. The research aimed to predict soil salinity using a combination of satellite [...] Read more.
In order to investigate the mechanism of environmental factors in soil salinization, this study focused on analyzing the temporal-spatial variation of soil salinity in the Ogan-Kuqa River Oasis in Xinjiang, China. The research aimed to predict soil salinity using a combination of satellite data, environmental covariates, and advanced modeling techniques. Firstly, Boruta and ReliefF algorithms were employed to select variables that significantly affect soil salinity from the Sentinel-2 satellite data and environmental covariates. Subsequently, a soil salinity inversion model was established using three advanced strategies: comprehensive variable analysis, a Boruta-based variable selection algorithm, and a ReliefF-based variable selection algorithm. Each strategy was modeled using a Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), an Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), and a Support Vector Machine (SVM). Finally, the Boruta-LightGBM strategy was proven to be the most effective in predicting soil electrical conductivity (EC), with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.72 and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 12.49 ds/m. The experimental results show that the red-edge band index is the foremost variable in predicting soil salinity, succeeded by the salinity index and soil attribute data, while the topographic index has the least influence, which further demonstrates that proper variable selection could significantly improve model functionality and predictive precision. Furthermore, the Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model was utilized to reveal the influence and temporal-temporal-spatial heterogeneity of environmental factors such as soil organic carbon (SOC), precipitation (PRE), pH value, and temperature (TEM) on soil EC. This research offers not just a viable methodological framework for monitoring soil salinization but also new perspectives on the environmental drivers of soil salinity changes, which have implications for sustainable land management and provide valuable information for decision-making in soil salinity control and mitigation efforts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Soil Conservation and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The workflow of this research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overview Map of the Study Area: (<b>a</b>) the study area in Xinjiang of China; (<b>b</b>) the river distribution of Kuqa-Ogan oasis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Locations of the sampling sites in the Ogan-Kuqa River Oasis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation coefficients between electrical conductivity (EC) and Sentinel-2 multi-spectral bands (<b>a</b>), between EC and vegetation indices (<b>b</b>), between EC and salinity indices (<b>c</b>), between EC and red-edge band indices (<b>d</b>), between EC and topographic indices (<b>e</b>), and between EC and meteorological and soil property indices (<b>f</b>). Symbols ‘**’ denote significance at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 probability level, while ‘*’ indicates significance at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 probability level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Importance of environmental covariates and bands determined by Boruta. Blue represents shadow features, green represents important features, and red represents unimportant features. Black rhombus represents the outlier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Feature Weighting According to the ReliefF Algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Measured and predicted regression analysis of Boruta-LightGBM modeling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Digital soil EC mapping driven by the Boruta-LightGBM Modelling strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Distribution of MGWR regression coefficients.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Distribution of MGWR regression coefficients.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Results of the MGWR model’s prediction of soil electrical conductivity (EC).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop