Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (546)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = nonlinear time series analysis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 3387 KiB  
Article
How Gait Nonlinearities in Individuals Without Known Pathology Describe Metabolic Cost During Walking Using Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Linear Regression
by Arash Mohammadzadeh Gonabadi, Farahnaz Fallahtafti and Judith M. Burnfield
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 11026; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311026 - 27 Nov 2024
Viewed by 379
Abstract
This study uses Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models to explore the relationship between gait dynamics and the metabolic cost. Six nonlinear metrics—Lyapunov Exponents based on Rosenstein’s algorithm (LyER), Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA), the Approximate Entropy (ApEn), the correlation [...] Read more.
This study uses Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models to explore the relationship between gait dynamics and the metabolic cost. Six nonlinear metrics—Lyapunov Exponents based on Rosenstein’s algorithm (LyER), Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA), the Approximate Entropy (ApEn), the correlation dimension (CD), the Sample Entropy (SpEn), and Lyapunov Exponents based on Wolf’s algorithm (LyEW)—were utilized to predict the metabolic cost during walking. Time series data from 10 subjects walking under 13 conditions, with and without hip exoskeletons, were analyzed. Six ANN models, each corresponding to a nonlinear metric, were trained using the Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation algorithm and compared with MLR models. Performance was assessed based on the mean squared error (MSE) and correlation coefficients. ANN models outperformed MLR, with DFA and Lyapunov Exponent models showing higher R2 values, indicating stronger predictive accuracy. The results suggest that gait’s nonlinear characteristics significantly impact the metabolic cost, and ANNs are more effective for analyzing these dynamics than MLR models. The study emphasizes the potential of focusing on specific nonlinear gait variables to enhance assistive device optimization, particularly for hip exoskeletons. These findings support the development of personalized interventions that improve walking efficiency and reduce metabolic demands, offering insights into the design of advanced assistive technologies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow diagram of the research development process for predicting the metabolic cost using multiple linear regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models, based on six gait nonlinearity measures: the Lyapunov Exponent based on Rosenstein’s algorithm (LyER), Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA), the Approximate Entropy (ApEn), the correlation dimension (CD), the Sample Entropy (SpEn), and the Lyapunov Exponent based on Wolf’s algorithm (LyEW). The diagram outlines the sequential steps, from data collection and preparation through model design, cross-validation, and evaluation, and a comparative analysis of ANN and MLR models. Each variable represents specific gait parameters, including joint angles, velocities, moments, ground reaction forces (GRFs), and center of mass (COM) metrics. Key nonlinear measures for accurate metabolic cost prediction are emphasized, along with conclusions on the strengths and limitations of each model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs), the graphical analysis of gait nonlinearity measures, and their prediction errors. This figure illustrates the relationship between various gait parameters—such as joint angles, velocities, moments, center of mass (COM) displacement in the sagittal plane, and ground reaction force (GRF) magnitudes in vertical and anterior–posterior directions—and their influence on the prediction of the metabolic cost. Subfigures represent the mean of nonlinearity measures, (<b>A</b>) the Lyapunov Exponent based on Rosenstein’s algorithm (LyE<sub>R</sub>), (<b>B</b>) Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA), (<b>C</b>) the Approximate Entropy (ApEn), (<b>D</b>) the correlation dimension (CD), (<b>E</b>) the Sample Entropy (SpEn), and (<b>F</b>) the Lyapunov Exponent based on Wolf’s algorithm (LyE<sub>w</sub>), respectively. Blue bars (left vertical axis) indicate the measure values, while red bars (right vertical axis) show the corresponding prediction error of energy expenditure percentages, highlighting the impact of each gait parameter on the precision of metabolic cost estimation.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3472 KiB  
Article
Prediction of China’s Polysilicon Prices: A Combination Model Based on Variational Mode Decomposition, Sparrow Search Algorithm and Long Short-Term Memory
by Jining Wang, Lin Jiang and Lei Wang
Mathematics 2024, 12(23), 3690; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12233690 - 25 Nov 2024
Viewed by 307
Abstract
Given the non-stationarity, nonlinearity, and high complexity of polysilicon prices in the photovoltaic (PV) industry chain, this paper introduces upstream and downstream material prices of the PV industry chain and macroeconomic indicators as influencing factors. The VMD–SSA–LSTM combination model is constructed to predict [...] Read more.
Given the non-stationarity, nonlinearity, and high complexity of polysilicon prices in the photovoltaic (PV) industry chain, this paper introduces upstream and downstream material prices of the PV industry chain and macroeconomic indicators as influencing factors. The VMD–SSA–LSTM combination model is constructed to predict polysilicon prices, which is based on Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) and utilizes the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) to optimize the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. The research shows that decomposing the original polysilicon time series using the VMD algorithm effectively extracts the main features of polysilicon price data, reducing data instability. By optimizing the learning rate, hidden layer nodes, and regularization coefficients of the LSTM model using the Sparrow Search Algorithm, the model achieves higher convergence accuracy. Compared to the traditional LSTM model and VMD–LSTM model, the VMD–SSA–LSTM model exhibits the smallest error and the highest goodness-of-fit on the polysilicon dataset, demonstrating higher predictive accuracy for polysilicon prices, which provides more accurate reference data for market analysis and pricing decisions of the polysilicon industry. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>LSTM structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Process of the VMD–SSA–LSTM combined model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>VMD of polysilicon prices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Convergence curves of SSA–LSTM and PSO–LSTM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of errors for the three models used to predict polysilicon prices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of polysilicon price prediction results of the three models.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 6282 KiB  
Article
Quadrature Solution for Fractional Benjamin–Bona–Mahony–Burger Equations
by Waleed Mohammed Abdelfattah, Ola Ragb, Mokhtar Mohamed, Mohamed Salah and Abdelfattah Mustafa
Fractal Fract. 2024, 8(12), 685; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8120685 - 22 Nov 2024
Viewed by 298
Abstract
In this work, we present various novelty methods by employing the fractional differential quadrature technique to solve the time and space fractional nonlinear Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation and the Benjamin–Bona–Mahony–Burger equation. The novelty of these methods is based on the generalized Caputo sense, classical differential [...] Read more.
In this work, we present various novelty methods by employing the fractional differential quadrature technique to solve the time and space fractional nonlinear Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation and the Benjamin–Bona–Mahony–Burger equation. The novelty of these methods is based on the generalized Caputo sense, classical differential quadrature method, and discrete singular convolution methods based on two different kernels. Also, the solution strategy is to apply perturbation analysis or an iterative method to reduce the problem to a series of linear initial boundary value problems. Consequently, we apply these suggested techniques to reduce the nonlinear fractional PDEs into ordinary differential equations. Hence, to validate the suggested techniques, a solution to this problem was obtained by designing a MATLAB code for each method. Also, we compare this solution with the exact ones. Furthermore, more figures and tables have been investigated to illustrate the high accuracy and rapid convergence of these novel techniques. From the obtained solutions, it was found that the suggested techniques are easily applicable and effective, which can help in the study of the other higher-D nonlinear fractional PDEs emerging in mathematical physics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Numerical and Computational Methods)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Numerical algorithm procedure solution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Numerical solutions via RDK and exact solutions at x = 0.333 with different values of time (t) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>) k = 1, v = 2. (<b>b</b>) k = 2, v = 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Numerical solutions via RDK and exact solutions at x = 0.333 with different values of time (t) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>) v = 1, k = 1. (<b>b</b>) v = 1, k = 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Numerical solution by RDK with the parameter ε at various values of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.9</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Numerical solution by RDK with the diffusion parameter v at various values of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math> (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.9</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>RDK solutions at various values of x, t, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>15</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>RSK solutions at various values of x, t, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>(<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>(<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.9</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>(<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>(<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.7</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>RSK solutions at various values of x, t, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>(<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>(<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.9</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>(<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>(<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.7</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison results when n<sub>x</sub> = 10, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo> </mo> <mo> </mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mo> </mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Using (<b>a</b>) Exact <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) PDQM <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>c</b>) Exact <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo> </mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>d</b>) PDQM <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison results when n<sub>x</sub> = 10, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo> </mo> <mo> </mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.75</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mo> </mo> <mn>0.95</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Using (<b>a</b>) exact <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.75</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) DSCRSK <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.75</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>c</b>) exact <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo> </mo> <mn>0.95</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and (<b>d</b>) DSC-RSK <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.95</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison results of proposed methods with exact solution when n<sub>x</sub> = 10, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo> </mo> <mo> </mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo> </mo> <mo> </mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo> </mo> <mo> </mo> <mn>0.7</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 5287 KiB  
Article
Bayesian Identification of High-Performance Aircraft Aerodynamic Behaviour
by Muhammad Fawad Mazhar, Syed Manzar Abbas, Muhammad Wasim and Zeashan Hameed Khan
Aerospace 2024, 11(12), 960; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11120960 - 21 Nov 2024
Viewed by 303
Abstract
In this paper, nonlinear system identification using Bayesian network has been implemented to discover open-loop lateral-directional aerodynamic model parameters of an agile aircraft using a grey box modelling structure. Our novel technique has been demonstrated on simulated flight data from an F-16 nonlinear [...] Read more.
In this paper, nonlinear system identification using Bayesian network has been implemented to discover open-loop lateral-directional aerodynamic model parameters of an agile aircraft using a grey box modelling structure. Our novel technique has been demonstrated on simulated flight data from an F-16 nonlinear simulation of its Flight Dynamic Model (FDM). A mathematical model has been obtained using time series analysis of a Box–Jenkins (BJ) model structure, and parameter refinement has been performed using Bayesian mechanics. The aircraft nonlinear Flight Dynamic Model is adequately excited with doublet inputs, as per the dictates of its natural frequency, in accordance with non-parametric modelling (Finite Impulse Response) estimates. Time histories of optimized doublet inputs in the form of aileron and rudder deflections, and outputs in the form of roll and yaw rates are recorded. Dataset is pre-processed by implementing de-trending, smoothing, and filtering techniques. Blend of System Identification time-domain grey box modelling structures to include Output Error (OE) and Box–Jenkins (BJ) Models are stage-wise implemented in multiple flight conditions under varied stochastic models. Furthermore, a reduced order parsimonious model is obtained using Akaike information Criteria (AIC). Parameter error minimization activity is conducted using the Levenberg–Marquardt (L-M) Algorithm, and parameter refinement is performed using the Bayesian Algorithm due to its natural connection with grey box modelling. Comparative analysis of different nonlinear estimators is performed to obtain best estimates for the lateral–directional aerodynamic model of supersonic aircraft. Model Quality Assessment is conducted through statistical techniques namely: Residual Analysis, Best Fit Percentage, Fit Percentage Error, Mean Squared Error, and Model order. Results have shown promising one-step model predictions with an accuracy of 96.25%. Being a sequel to our previous research work for postulating longitudinal aerodynamic model of supersonic aircraft, this work completes the overall aerodynamic model, further leading towards insight to its flight control laws and subsequent simulator design. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Aeronautics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Research Framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Top Level Simulink Model of Aircraft Flight Dynamic Model (MATLAB-2021b).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>F-16 6-DOF Dynamics [<a href="#B39-aerospace-11-00960" class="html-bibr">39</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Optimal Input Design Flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Bayesian Implementation Flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>F-16 Kinematics Variables [<a href="#B39-aerospace-11-00960" class="html-bibr">39</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Non-Parametric (FIR) Model of Aircraft.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Bode Plot Aircraft Lateral Dynamics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Simulated Time-Skewed 2-1-1 Doublet Inputs—Aileron (δa) and Rudder (δr).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Roll and Yaw Rate Time histories in repose to 2-1-1 Doublet Inputs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Roll and Pitch Angle time histories to 2-1-1 Doublet Inputs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Aircraft Parameter Refinement Flow chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Initial OE Model; (<b>b</b>) Reduced Order OE Model; (<b>c</b>) Initial BJ Model; (<b>d</b>) Optimized BJ Model; (<b>e</b>) Residual Correlation; (<b>f</b>) pdf of Model Parameters; (<b>g</b>) Posterior Sensitivity Analysis (K-L Divergence)—Straight and Level Flight.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Initial OE Model; (<b>b</b>) Reduced Order OE Model; (<b>c</b>) Initial BJ Model; (<b>d</b>) Optimized BJ Model; (<b>e</b>) Residual Correlation; (<b>f</b>) pdf of Model Parameters; (<b>g</b>) Posterior Sensitivity Analysis (K-L Divergence)—Straight and Level Flight.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>) Initial OE Model; (<b>b</b>) Reduced Order OE Model; (<b>c</b>) Initial BJ Model; (<b>d</b>) Optimized BJ Model; (<b>e</b>) Residual Correlation; (<b>f</b>) pdf of Model Parameters; (<b>g</b>) Posterior Sensitivity Analysis (K-L Divergence)—Coordinated Turn Flight.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2074 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Slow Feature Analysis and Its Variants for Fault Diagnosis in Process Industries
by Abid Aman, Yan Chen and Liu Yiqi
Technologies 2024, 12(12), 237; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12120237 - 21 Nov 2024
Viewed by 637
Abstract
Accurate monitoring of complex industrial plants is crucial for ensuring safe operations and reliable management of desired quality. Early detection of abnormal events is essential to preempt serious consequences, enhance system performance, and reduce manufacturing costs. In this work, we propose a novel [...] Read more.
Accurate monitoring of complex industrial plants is crucial for ensuring safe operations and reliable management of desired quality. Early detection of abnormal events is essential to preempt serious consequences, enhance system performance, and reduce manufacturing costs. In this work, we propose a novel methodology for fault detection based on Slow Feature Analysis (SFA) tailored for time series models and statistical process control. Fault detection is critical in process monitoring and can ensure that systems operate efficiently and safely. This study investigates the effectiveness of various multivariate statistical methods, including Slow Feature Analysis (SFA), Kernel Slow Feature Analysis (KSFA), Dynamic Slow Feature Analysis (DSFA), and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in detecting faults within the Tennessee Eastman (TE), Benchmark Simulation Model No. 1 (BSM 1) datasets and Beijing wastewater treatment plant (real world). Our comprehensive analysis indicates that KSFA and DSFA significantly outperform traditional methods by providing enhanced sensitivity and fault detection capabilities, particularly in complex, nonlinear, and dynamic data environments. The comparative analysis underscores the superior performance of KSFA and DSFA in capturing comprehensive process behavior, making them robust, cutting-edge choices for advanced fault detection applications. Such methodologies promise substantial improvements in industrial plant monitoring, contributing to heightened system reliability, safety, and overall operational efficiency. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Main diagram of the Tennessee Eastman Process comprises of Reactor, Condenser, Stripper, Compressor, Vapour liquid separator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Tennessee Eastman (TE) fault detection performance on: (<b>a</b>) Slow Feature Analysis (SFA); (<b>b</b>) Kernel Slow Feature Analysis (KSFA); (<b>c</b>) Dynamic Slow Feature Analysis (DSFA); (<b>d</b>) Principal Component Analysis (PCA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>BSM 1 Plant layout comprises of five units.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Benchmark Simulation Model (BSM1) fault detection performance on: (<b>a</b>) Slow Feature Analysis (SFA); (<b>b</b>) Kernel Slow Feature Analysis (KSFA); (<b>c</b>) Dynamic Slow Feature Analysis (DSFA); (<b>d</b>) Principal Component Analysis (PCA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram of Beijing Plant oxidation ditch process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Beijing wastewater treatment plant fault detection performance on: (<b>a</b>) Slow Feature Analysis (SFA); (<b>b</b>) Kernel Slow Feature Analysis (KSFA); (<b>c</b>) Dynamic Slow Feature Analysis (DSFA); (<b>d</b>) Principal Component Analysis (PCA).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2455 KiB  
Article
Climate-Based Prediction of Rice Blast Disease Using Count Time Series and Machine Learning Approaches
by Meena Arumugam Gopalakrishnan, Gopalakrishnan Chellappan, Santhosh Ganapati Patil, Santosha Rathod, Kamalakannan Ayyanar, Jagadeeswaran Ramasamy, Sathyamoorthy Nagaranai Karuppasamy and Manonmani Swaminathan
AgriEngineering 2024, 6(4), 4353-4371; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6040246 - 19 Nov 2024
Viewed by 384
Abstract
Magnaporthe oryzae, the source of the rice blast, is a serious threat to the world’s rice supply, particularly in areas like Tamil Nadu, India. In this study, weather-based models were developed based on count time series and machine learning techniques like INGARCHX, [...] Read more.
Magnaporthe oryzae, the source of the rice blast, is a serious threat to the world’s rice supply, particularly in areas like Tamil Nadu, India. In this study, weather-based models were developed based on count time series and machine learning techniques like INGARCHX, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Support Vector Regression (SVR), to forecast the incidence of rice blast disease. Between 2015 and 2023, information on rice blast occurrence was gathered weekly from three locations (Thanjavur, Tirunelveli, and Coimbatore), together with relevant meteorological data like temperature, humidity, rainfall, sunshine, evaporation, and sun radiation. The associations between the occurrence of rice blast and environmental factors were investigated using stepwise regression analysis, descriptive statistics, and correlation. Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) were used to assess the model’s prediction ability. The best prediction accuracy was given by the ANN, which outperformed SVR and INGARCHX in every location, according to the results. The complicated and non-linear relationships between meteorological variables and disease incidence were well-represented by the ANN model. The Diebold–Mariano test further demonstrated that ANNs are more predictive than other models. This work shows how machine learning algorithms can improve the prediction of rice blast, offering vital information for early disease management. The application of these models can help farmers make timely decisions to minimize crop losses. The findings suggest that machine learning models offer promising potential for accurate disease forecasting and improved rice management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Artificial Neural Network in Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Rice blast incidence documented in study area. The image was captured by the author at Paddy Breeding Station, TNAU, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Study area for rice blast incidence in Tamil Nadu.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Architecture of the SVR (<b>a</b>) and ANN (<b>b</b>) models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time series plots of rice blast occurrence at Tirunelveli (<b>A</b>), Thanjavur (<b>B</b>), and Coimbatore (<b>C</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Actual vs. fitted plots of rice blast occurrence, Tirunelveli (<b>A</b>), Thanjavur (<b>B</b>), and Coimbatore (<b>C</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of performance of each model based on error metrics MSE and RMSE of both testing and training set for Tirunelveli, Thanjavur, and Coimbatore.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 5062 KiB  
Article
Audio-Based Engine Fault Diagnosis with Wavelet, Markov Blanket, ROCKET, and Optimized Machine Learning Classifiers
by Bernardo Luis Tuleski, Cristina Keiko Yamaguchi, Stefano Frizzo Stefenon, Leandro dos Santos Coelho and Viviana Cocco Mariani
Sensors 2024, 24(22), 7316; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227316 - 15 Nov 2024
Viewed by 493
Abstract
Engine fault diagnosis is a critical task in automotive aftermarket management. Developing appropriate fault-labeled datasets can be challenging due to nonlinearity variations and divergence in feature distribution among different engine kinds or operating scenarios. To solve this task, this study experimentally measures audio [...] Read more.
Engine fault diagnosis is a critical task in automotive aftermarket management. Developing appropriate fault-labeled datasets can be challenging due to nonlinearity variations and divergence in feature distribution among different engine kinds or operating scenarios. To solve this task, this study experimentally measures audio emission signals from compression ignition engines in different vehicles, simulating injector failures, intake hose failures, and absence of failures. Based on these faults, a hybrid approach is applied to classify different conditions that help the planning and decision-making of the automobile industry. The proposed hybrid approach combines the wavelet packet transform (WPT), Markov blanket feature selection, random convolutional kernel transform (ROCKET), tree-structured Parzen estimator (TPE) for hyperparameters tuning, and ten machine learning (ML) classifiers, such as ridge regression, quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), naive Bayes, k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP), random forest (RF), extra trees (ET), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and LightGBM. The audio data are broken down into sub-time series with various frequencies and resolutions using the WPT. These data are subsequently utilized as input for obtaining an informative feature subset using a Markov blanket-based selection method. This feature subset is then fed into the ROCKET method, which is paired with ML classifiers, and tuned using Optuna using the TPE approach. The generalization performance applying the proposed hybrid approach outperforms other standard ML classifiers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Fault Diagnosis & Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Example of simulated failures in the vehicles: (<b>a</b>) connected injector, (<b>b</b>) injector disconnected, (<b>c</b>) intake hose connected, and (<b>d</b>) intake hose disconnected.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Audio data collection position of the vehicles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Original audio signal: (<b>A</b>) normal condition; (<b>B</b>) injector off; (<b>C</b>) air intake hose off.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart of the proposed classification approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>ROCKET architecture.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 10776 KiB  
Article
Numerical Investigation of the Nonlinear Drill String Dynamics Under Stick–Slip Vibration
by Mohammad Javad Moharrami, Hodjat Shiri and Clóvis de Arruda Martins
Vibration 2024, 7(4), 1086-1110; https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration7040056 - 15 Nov 2024
Viewed by 403
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the influence of rotary table velocity, weight-on-bit, and viscous damping on the drill string stick–slip vibration. The analysis allows for studying the qualitative and quantitative variation of the dynamic response of the drill pipes and drill [...] Read more.
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the influence of rotary table velocity, weight-on-bit, and viscous damping on the drill string stick–slip vibration. The analysis allows for studying the qualitative and quantitative variation of the dynamic response of the drill pipes and drill collars/bit. To achieve this goal, a robust and practical finite element (FE) model of the full-scaled drill string was developed based on a velocity-weakening formulation of the nonlinear bit–rock interaction. A detailed investigation of damping parameters was carried out. The performance of the developed model was verified through comparisons with a lumped-parameter model and a field test example. Parametric studies on the stick–slip response of the entire drill string under different field operational conditions were conducted. The dynamical time series of the system response were analyzed in terms of the phase planes, response spectra, and descriptive statistics of the drill pipes and drill collars. The findings of the study revealed that for a realistic drill string geometry, the angular velocity (i.e., mean, peak-to-peak amplitude, and standard deviation) and dominant frequency of self-excited torsional stick–slip oscillations along the drill pipes and drill collars/bit are mainly governed by the rotary table velocity. Furthermore, it was shown that the contribution of higher harmonics in the torsional stick–slip response of the drill pipes is more substantial than the drill collars/bit. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of a typical offshore drilling system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A sketch of the considered full drill string (<b>left</b>) and the corresponding FEM model developed in ABAQUS with boundary conditions at the surface and the bit (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of frequency band on the Rayleigh damping variations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Lumped-parameter model representation of the drill string.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Friction model at the bit: switch friction model (enhanced Karnopp friction model) + Stribeck model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Example stick–slip time series and phase planes of the bit angular velocity obtained from (<b>a</b>) the FEM model and (<b>b</b>) the lumped-parameter model using Equations (7) and (11) with parameter values given in <a href="#vibration-07-00056-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a>. <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 7.33 rad/s (dashed lines), <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN, and <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03 (with <span class="html-italic">α</span> = 0.070416 1/s and <span class="html-italic">β</span> = 0.00132142 s).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Example of stick–slip vibration occurring in the field test under constant rotational velocity <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 9.42 rad/s. Field test result from [<a href="#B48-vibration-07-00056" class="html-bibr">48</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Definition of the peak-to-peak amplitude (2<span class="html-italic">A</span>) of angular velocity under stick–slip conditions for <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 5.24 rad/s, <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, and <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Time series and phase planes of the angular velocity at the drill bit for <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN, <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, and <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> of (<b>a</b>) 2.09, (<b>b</b>) 5.24, (<b>c</b>) 7.33, and (<b>d</b>) 11.52 rad/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Time series and phase planes of the angular velocity at 1900 m above the drill bit for <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN, <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, and <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> of (<b>a</b>) 2.09, (<b>b</b>) 5.24, (<b>c</b>) 7.33, and (<b>d</b>) 11.52 rad/s.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Response spectra of angular velocity at the drill bit (<b>left</b>) and 1900 m above the bit (<b>right</b>) with <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN, <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, and <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> of (<b>a</b>) 2.09, (<b>b</b>) 5.24, (<b>c</b>) 7.33, and (<b>d</b>) 11.52 rad/s. Dashed lines indicate natural frequencies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Time series and phase planes of the angular velocity at the bit for <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 6.3 rad/s, <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, and <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> of (<b>a</b>) 10, (<b>b</b>) 30, (<b>c</b>) 40, and (<b>d</b>) 50 kN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Time series and phase planes of the angular velocity at 1650 m above the bit for <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 6.3 rad/s, <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, and <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> of (<b>a</b>) 10, (<b>b</b>) 30, (<b>c</b>) 40, and (<b>d</b>) 50 kN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Response spectra of angular velocity at the drill bit (<b>left</b>) and 1650 m above the bit (<b>right</b>) for <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 6.3 rad/s, <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, and <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> of (<b>a</b>) 10 kN, (<b>b</b>) 30 kN, (<b>c</b>) 40 kN, and (<b>d</b>) 50 kN. Dashed lines indicate natural frequencies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Time series and phase planes of the angular velocity at the bit for <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 5.24 rad/s, <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN, and <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> of (<b>a</b>) 0.05, (<b>b</b>) 0.10, (<b>c</b>) 0.20, (<b>d</b>) 0.27, and 0.30.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Time series and phase planes of the angular velocity at 1400 m above the bit for <span class="html-italic">Ω</span><sub>r</sub> = 5.24 rad/s, <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN, and <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> of (<b>a</b>) 0.05, (<b>b</b>) 0.10, (<b>c</b>) 0.20, (<b>d</b>) 0.27, and 0.30.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Response spectra of angular velocity at the drill bit (<b>left</b>) and 1400 m above the bit (<b>right</b>) for <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 5.24 rad/s, <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN, and <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> of (<b>a</b>) 0.05, (<b>b</b>) 0.10, (<b>c</b>) 0.20, and (<b>d</b>) 0.27.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Time series (<b>left</b>) and phase planes (<b>right</b>) of the bit response obtained from the FEM model (solid lines) and the lumped-parameter model (dashed lines) for <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 5.24 rad/s, <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN, and <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> of (<b>a</b>) 0.10 and (<b>b</b>) 0.13.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Variation of the peak-to-peak amplitude of angular velocity along the drill string under different stick–slip conditions. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN and <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 6.3 rad/s and <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, and (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 5.24 rad/s and <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Variation of the standard deviation of angular velocity along the drill string under different stick–slip conditions. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN and <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 6.3 rad/s and <span class="html-italic">ξ</span> = 0.03, and (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">Ω<sub>r</sub></span> = 5.24 rad/s and <span class="html-italic">W<sub>b</sub></span> = 40 kN.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4507 KiB  
Article
Simplified Gravity Load Collapse Dynamic Analysis of Old-Type Reinforced Concrete Frames
by Konstantinos G. Megalooikonomou
Constr. Mater. 2024, 4(4), 704-720; https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater4040038 - 14 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1105
Abstract
The results of shaking table tests from previous studies on a one-story, two-bay reinforced concrete frame—exhibiting both shear and axial failures—were compared with nonlinear dynamic analyses using simplified models intended to evaluate the collapse potential of older reinforced concrete structures. To replicate the [...] Read more.
The results of shaking table tests from previous studies on a one-story, two-bay reinforced concrete frame—exhibiting both shear and axial failures—were compared with nonlinear dynamic analyses using simplified models intended to evaluate the collapse potential of older reinforced concrete structures. To replicate the nonlinear behavior of columns, whether shear-critical or primarily flexure-dominant, a one-component beam model was applied. This model features a linear elastic element connected in series to a rigid plastic, linearly hardening spring at each end, representing a concentrated plasticity component. To account for strength degradation through path-dependent plasticity, a negative slope model as degradation was implemented, linking points at both shear and axial failure. The shear failure points were determined through pushover analysis of shear-critical columns using Phaethon software. Although the simplified model provided a reasonable approximation of the overall frame response and lateral strength degradation, especially in terms of drift, its reduced computational demands led to some discrepancies between the calculated and measured shear forces and drifts during certain segments of the time-history response. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Graphical research framework of this study (Δ<span class="html-italic"><sub>shear</sub></span> cantilever lateral displacement due to shear mechanism, Δ<span class="html-italic"><sub>slip</sub></span> cantilever lateral displacement due to pull-out slip of anchorage or lap splice, Δ<span class="html-italic"><sub>flex</sub></span> cantilever lateral displacement due to flexure, Δ<span class="html-italic"><sub>tot</sub></span> total lateral displacement, <span class="html-italic">l<sub>r</sub></span> yield penetration length in the anchorage, <span class="html-italic">f<sub>by</sub></span> local bond strength of the anchorage, <span class="html-italic">l<sub>p</sub></span> plastic hinge length, <span class="html-italic">γ<sub>e</sub></span> elastic shear strain, <span class="html-italic">γ<sub>p</sub></span> plastic shear strain. <span class="html-italic">θ</span> cantilever lateral rotation, <span class="html-italic">θ<sub>slip</sub></span> cantilever lateral rotation due to pull-out slip, <span class="html-italic">V<sub>R</sub></span> shear strength, <span class="html-italic">L<sub>s</sub></span> shear span, <span class="html-italic">d</span> column section effective depth, <span class="html-italic">V</span> seismic shear force, Δ lateral displacement, Δ<span class="html-italic"><sub>s</sub></span> lateral displacement at shear failure, Δ<span class="html-italic"><sub>a</sub></span> lateral displacement at axial failure).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Beam (<b>a</b>) displacements and (<b>b</b>) forces in global, local, and basic reference systems and (<b>c</b>) one-component beam model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Specimen 2 of shake table test [<a href="#B37-constrmater-04-00038" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B38-constrmater-04-00038" class="html-bibr">38</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Simplified numerical model implemented in MATLAB 2024b.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Capacity curve of center shear-critical column of Specimen 2 and lateral displacement contributions for each step of the pushover analysis (16 total pushover steps of 5 kN) [This is a screenshot from Phaethon Windows software’s user interface].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Strain, slip, and bond distributions along the straight anchorage length of center shear-critical column of Specimen 2 for pushover step 15 of Phaethon Windows software. See also <a href="#constrmater-04-00038-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> and <a href="#constrmater-04-00038-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Time-history responses in terms of drift, base shear, and center column shear of Specimen 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Absolute error time-history responses in terms of drift, base shear, and center column shear of Specimen 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Shear hysteretic response of Specimen 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Below beam moment–rotation hysteretic response of center column of Specimen 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Below beam moment–rotation hysteretic response of outside column of Specimen 2.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 11682 KiB  
Article
Comparative Study of Time Series Analysis Algorithms Suitable for Short-Term Forecasting in Implementing Demand Response Based on AMI
by Myung-Joo Park and Hyo-Sik Yang
Sensors 2024, 24(22), 7205; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227205 - 11 Nov 2024
Viewed by 405
Abstract
This paper compares four time series forecasting algorithms—ARIMA, SARIMA, LSTM, and SVM—suitable for short-term load forecasting using Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) data. The primary focus is on evaluating the applicability and performance of these forecasting models in predicting electricity consumption patterns, which is [...] Read more.
This paper compares four time series forecasting algorithms—ARIMA, SARIMA, LSTM, and SVM—suitable for short-term load forecasting using Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) data. The primary focus is on evaluating the applicability and performance of these forecasting models in predicting electricity consumption patterns, which is a critical component for implementing effective demand response (DR) strategies. The study provides a comprehensive analysis of the predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and scalability of each algorithm using a dataset of real-time electricity consumption collected from AMI systems over a designated period. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that each algorithm has distinct strengths and weaknesses depending on the characteristics of the dataset. Specifically, SVM exhibited superior performance in handling nonlinear patterns and high volatility, while SARIMA effectively captured seasonal trends. LSTM showed potential in modeling complex temporal dependencies but was sensitive to hyperparameter settings and required a substantial amount of training data. This research offers practical guidelines for selecting the optimal forecasting model based on data characteristics and application needs, contributing to the development of more efficient and dynamic energy management strategies. The findings highlight the importance of integrating advanced forecasting techniques into smart grid systems to enhance the reliability and responsiveness of DR programs. This study lays a solid foundation for future research on integrating these forecasting models into real-world AMI applications to support effective demand response and grid stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue IoT and Big Data Analytics for Smart Cities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Possibility of overfitting due to amount of learning data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Neural network without dropout.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Neural network with dropout.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution and trend line graphs of sampled data by consumer number (CNSMR_NO).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in DJ0200309001501.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in DJ0800133001204.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in DJ1200215000404.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CB0100106000505.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN0100107001801.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN0200311001801.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN1100106000103.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN1600102001004.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN0500311000403.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN0700109000102.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 8983 KiB  
Article
A Finite-Time Disturbance Observer for Tracking Control of Nonlinear Systems Subject to Model Uncertainties and Disturbances
by Manh Hung Nguyen and Kyoung Kwan Ahn
Mathematics 2024, 12(22), 3512; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12223512 - 10 Nov 2024
Viewed by 492
Abstract
In this study, a finite-time disturbance observer (FTDOB) with a new structure is originally put forward for the motion tracking problem of a class of nonlinear systems subject to model uncertainties and exogenous disturbances. Compared to existing disturbance estimator designs in the literature, [...] Read more.
In this study, a finite-time disturbance observer (FTDOB) with a new structure is originally put forward for the motion tracking problem of a class of nonlinear systems subject to model uncertainties and exogenous disturbances. Compared to existing disturbance estimator designs in the literature, in which the estimation error only converges to the origin asymptotically under assumptions that the first and/or second derivatives are vanishing, the suggested DOB is able to estimate the disturbance exactly in finite time. Firstly, uncertainties (parametric and unstructured uncertainties), unknown dynamics, and external disturbances in system dynamics are lumped into a generalized disturbance term that is subsequently estimated by the proposed DOB. Based on this, a DOB-based backstepping controller is synthesized to ensure high-accuracy tracking performance under various working conditions. The stability analysis of not only the DOB but also the overall closed-loop system is theoretically confirmed by the Lyapunov stability theory. Finally, the advantages of the proposed FTDOB and the FTDOB-based controller over other DOBs and existing DOB-based controllers are explicitly simultaneously demonstrated by a series of numerical simulations on a second-order mechanical system and comparative experiments on an actual DC motor system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Control Systems and Automatic Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The disturbance estimations of the compared observers with the square-pulse-like external disturbance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The estimation errors of the compared observers with the square-pulse-like external disturbance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The estimation errors of compared observers with the sinusoidal-like external disturbance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The estimation errors of the compared estimators.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The tracking errors of the compared observer-based controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The experimental platform of a DC motor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The control scheme of compared controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Tracking errors of three comparative controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Disturbance estimation of the proposed disturbance observer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Control input of the proposed controller.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 13404 KiB  
Article
An Evaluation of the Structural Behaviour of Historic Buildings Under Seismic Action: A Multidisciplinary Approach Using Two Case Studies
by Marco Zucca, Emanuele Reccia, Enrica Vecchi, Valentina Pintus, Andrea Dessì and Antonio Cazzani
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10274; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210274 - 8 Nov 2024
Viewed by 660
Abstract
The evaluation of the structural behaviour of iconic historic buildings represents one of the most current structural engineering research topics. However, despite the various research works carried out during recent decades, several issues still remain open. One of the most important aspects is [...] Read more.
The evaluation of the structural behaviour of iconic historic buildings represents one of the most current structural engineering research topics. However, despite the various research works carried out during recent decades, several issues still remain open. One of the most important aspects is related to the correct reconstruction of the complex geometries that characterise this type of construction and that influence structural behaviour, especially in the presence of the horizontal loads caused by seismic action. For these reasons, different techniques have been proposed based on the use of laser scanners, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), and terrestrial photogrammetry. At the same time, several analysis methods have been developed that include the use of linear and non-linear approaches. In this present paper, the seismic performance of the Santa Maria Novella basilica and Santa Maria di Collemaggio basilica (before the partial collapse due to the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake) were investigated in detail by means of several numerical analyses. In particular, a series of non-linear time history analyses (NTHAs) were carried out, as reported in the Italian Building Code. To represent the non-linear behaviour of the main structural elements, smeared cracking (CSC) constitutive law was adopted. The geometry of the structures was reconstructed from a complete laser scanner survey of the churches, in order to consider all the intrinsic irregularities that characterise the heritage buildings. Finally, a comparison between the structural behaviour of the two case studies was carried out, highlighting the differences and similar aspects, focusing on possible collapse mechanisms and the identification of the most critical structural elements represented, in both cases analysed, by the main pillars of the transept. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Santa Maria Novella basilica.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Florence, basilica of Santa Maria Novella. Evolution of its layout [<a href="#B20-applsci-14-10274" class="html-bibr">20</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Florence, basilica of Santa Maria Novella. (<b>a</b>) Plan; and (<b>b</b>) longitudinal section [<a href="#B20-applsci-14-10274" class="html-bibr">20</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Basilica of Santa Maria di Collemaggio. (<b>a</b>) Central nave; and (<b>b</b>) façade.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Basilica of Santa Maria di Collemaggio. (<b>a</b>) Plan; and (<b>b</b>) longitudinal section (before the partial collapse that occurred during the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake). The red dashed outline indicates the transept area that collapsed during the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Example of vault schematization: (<b>a</b>) polylines of sections obtained from the point cloud; and (<b>b</b>) surface of the vault.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Façade representation: (<b>a</b>) Santa Maria di Collemaggio; and (<b>b</b>) Santa Maria Novella.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>FEM of (<b>a</b>) Santa Maria di Collemaggio; and (<b>b</b>) Santa Maria Novella.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Eccentricity between the gravity centre (G<sub>c</sub>) and the stiffness centre (S<sub>c</sub>): (<b>a</b>) Santa Maria di Collemaggio; and (<b>b</b>) Santa Maria Novella.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Main fundamental vibration periods for Santa Maria di Collemaggio: (<b>a</b>) mode 1, period: 0.674 s, MT = 37.49%, and ML = 0.00%; (<b>b</b>) mode 4, period: 0.400 s, MT = 14.43%, and ML = 0.04%; (<b>c</b>) mode 10, period: 0.318 s, MT = 0.19%, and ML = 32.79%; and (<b>d</b>) mode 13, period: 0.290 s, MT = 0.53%, and ML = 10.68%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Main fundamental vibration periods for Santa Maria Novella: (<b>a</b>) mode 1, period: 0.896 s, MT = 44.14%, and ML = 0.00%; (<b>b</b>) mode 4, period: 0.525 s, MT = 0.00%, and ML = 58.64%; (<b>c</b>) mode 5, period: 0.475 s, MT = 21.77%, and ML = 0.00%; and (<b>d</b>) mode 11, period: 0.341 s, MT = 0.00%, and ML = 1.58%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Compressive and (<b>b</b>) tensile non-linear behaviour function of CSC constitutive law.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2515 KiB  
Article
A Convolutional Neural Network–Long Short-Term Memory–Attention Solar Photovoltaic Power Prediction–Correction Model Based on the Division of Twenty-Four Solar Terms
by Guodong Wu, Diangang Hu, Yongrui Zhang, Guangqing Bao and Ting He
Energies 2024, 17(22), 5549; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225549 - 6 Nov 2024
Viewed by 532
Abstract
The prevalence of extreme weather events gives rise to a significant degree of prediction bias in the forecasting of photovoltaic (PV) power. In order to enhance the precision of forecasting outcomes, this study examines the interrelationships between China’s 24 conventional solar terms and [...] Read more.
The prevalence of extreme weather events gives rise to a significant degree of prediction bias in the forecasting of photovoltaic (PV) power. In order to enhance the precision of forecasting outcomes, this study examines the interrelationships between China’s 24 conventional solar terms and extreme meteorological events. Additionally, it proposes a methodology for estimating the short-term generation of PV power based on the division of solar term time series. Firstly, given that the meteorological data from the same festival is more representative of the climate state at the current prediction moment, the sample data are grouped according to the 24 festival time nodes. Secondly, a convolutional neural network–long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) PV power prediction model based on an Attention mechanism is proposed. This model extracts temporal change information from nonlinear sample data through LSTM, and a CNN link is added at the front end of LSTM to address the issue of LSTM being unable to obtain the spatial linkage of multiple features. Additionally, an Attention mechanism is incorporated at the back end of the CNN to obtain the feature information of crucial time steps, further reducing the multi-step prediction error. Concurrently, a PV power error prediction model is constructed to rectify the outcomes of the aforementioned prediction model. The examination of the measured data from PV power stations and the comparison and analysis with other prediction models demonstrate that the model presented in this paper can effectively enhance the accuracy of PV power predictions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section A2: Solar Energy and Photovoltaic Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Input feature correlation histogram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Division diagram of the 24 solar terms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Time sequence diagram of total radiation during the Lesser Cold period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time sequence diagram of total radiation during Lesser Fullness of Grain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparisons of total radiation, short-term prediction, and measured power under cold wave weather conditions: (<b>a</b>) comparison results on 9 January 2021; (<b>b</b>) comparison results on 11 January 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of total radiation, short-term prediction, and measured power under sandstorm weather conditions: (<b>a</b>) comparison results on 29 May 2021; (<b>b</b>) comparison results on 26 May 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of daily PV power prediction MAPE by time period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flow chart for PV power prediction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Structure of CNN-LSTM-Attention prediction model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The influence of power error correction on prediction results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>PV power prediction result comparison between the proposed method and novel models: (<b>a</b>) comparison of predicted results from contrasting experiments; (<b>b</b>) comparison of predicted results from ablation experiments.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 4502 KiB  
Article
Improved Bacterial Foraging Optimization Algorithm with Machine Learning-Driven Short-Term Electricity Load Forecasting: A Case Study in Peninsular Malaysia
by Farah Anishah Zaini, Mohamad Fani Sulaima, Intan Azmira Wan Abdul Razak, Mohammad Lutfi Othman and Hazlie Mokhlis
Algorithms 2024, 17(11), 510; https://doi.org/10.3390/a17110510 - 6 Nov 2024
Viewed by 494
Abstract
Accurate electricity demand forecasting is crucial for ensuring the sustainability and reliability of power systems. Least square support vector machines (LSSVM) are well suited to handle complex non-linear power load series. However, the less optimal regularization parameter and the Gaussian kernel function in [...] Read more.
Accurate electricity demand forecasting is crucial for ensuring the sustainability and reliability of power systems. Least square support vector machines (LSSVM) are well suited to handle complex non-linear power load series. However, the less optimal regularization parameter and the Gaussian kernel function in the LSSVM model have contributed to flawed forecasting accuracy and random generalization ability. Thus, these parameters of LSSVM need to be chosen appropriately using intelligent optimization algorithms. This study proposes a new hybrid model based on the LSSVM optimized by the improved bacterial foraging optimization algorithm (IBFOA) for forecasting the short-term daily electricity load in Peninsular Malaysia. The IBFOA based on the sine cosine equation addresses the limitations of fixed chemotaxis constants in the original bacterial foraging optimization algorithm (BFOA), enhancing its exploration and exploitation capabilities. Finally, the load forecasting model based on LSSVM-IBFOA is constructed using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) as the objective function. The comparative analysis demonstrates the model, achieving the highest determination coefficient (R2) of 0.9880 and significantly reducing the average MAPE value by 28.36%, 27.72%, and 5.47% compared to the deep neural network (DNN), LSSVM, and LSSVM-BFOA, respectively. Additionally, IBFOA exhibits faster convergence times compared to BFOA, highlighting the practicality of LSSVM-IBFOA for short-term load forecasting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Summary of different types of LF with respective time horizons, domains, inputs, and outputs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Framework for electricity load forecasting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Structures of LSSVM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The flowchart of LSSVM-IBFOA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Monthly average electricity load profile in 24 h (2019–2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Typical weekly average load profile in December 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Visualization of forecasting result for the DNN, LSSVM, LSSVM-BFOA, and LSSVM-IBFOA for (<b>a</b>) Monday; (<b>b</b>) Tuesday–Thursday; (<b>c</b>) Friday; (<b>d</b>) Saturday, and (<b>e</b>) Sunday.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Visualization of forecasting result for the DNN, LSSVM, LSSVM-BFOA, and LSSVM-IBFOA for (<b>a</b>) Monday; (<b>b</b>) Tuesday–Thursday; (<b>c</b>) Friday; (<b>d</b>) Saturday, and (<b>e</b>) Sunday.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>Visualization of forecasting result for the DNN, LSSVM, LSSVM-BFOA, and LSSVM-IBFOA for (<b>a</b>) Monday; (<b>b</b>) Tuesday–Thursday; (<b>c</b>) Friday; (<b>d</b>) Saturday, and (<b>e</b>) Sunday.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Illustrations of plots for MAPE and MAE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Convergence curve of BFOA and IBFOA for (<b>a</b>) Monday; (<b>b</b>) Tuesday–Thursday; (<b>c</b>) Friday; (<b>d</b>) Saturday; and (<b>e</b>) Sunday.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 7056 KiB  
Article
Land Subsidence Predictions Based on a Multi-Component Temporal Convolutional Gated Recurrent Unit Model in Kunming City
by Tao Chen, Di Ning and Yuhang Liu
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(21), 10021; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142110021 - 2 Nov 2024
Viewed by 604
Abstract
Land subsidence (LS) is a geological hazard driven by both natural conditions and human activities. Traditional LS time-series prediction models often struggle to accurately capture nonlinear data characteristics, leading to suboptimal predictions. To address this issue, this paper introduces a multi-component temporal convolutional [...] Read more.
Land subsidence (LS) is a geological hazard driven by both natural conditions and human activities. Traditional LS time-series prediction models often struggle to accurately capture nonlinear data characteristics, leading to suboptimal predictions. To address this issue, this paper introduces a multi-component temporal convolutional gate recurrent unit (MC-TCGRU) model, which integrates a fully adaptive noise-ensemble empirical-mode decomposition algorithm with a deep neural network to account for the complexity of time-series data. The model was validated using typical InSAR subsidence data from Kunming, analyzing the impact of each component on the prediction performance. A comparative analysis with the TCGRU model and models based on seasonal-trend decomposition using LOESS (STL) and empirical-mode decomposition (EMD) revealed that the MC-TCGRU model significantly enhanced the prediction accuracy by reducing the complexity of the original data. The model achieved R² values of 0.90, 0.93, 0.51, 0.93, and 0.96 across five points, outperforming the compared models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Remote Sensing Technologies and Their Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area, with an indication of the administrative boundaries of Kunming City.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Structure of the GRU network unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Structure of the TCN residual block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Structure of the TCGRU model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Structure of the proposed MC-TCGRU model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Deformation velocity map of the study area, with indication of five distinct LS regions and points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>CEEMDAN decomposition results for 5 LS points. (<b>a</b>) P1; (<b>b</b>) P2; (<b>c</b>) P3; (<b>d</b>) P4; and (<b>e</b>) P5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Prediction results of each component based on CEEMDAN for point P1; (<b>a</b>) IMF<sub>1</sub> component; (<b>b</b>) IMF<sub>2</sub> component; (<b>c</b>) IMF<sub>3</sub> component; and (<b>d</b>) residual component.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Prediction results of each component based on CEEMDAN for point P1; (<b>a</b>) IMF<sub>1</sub> component; (<b>b</b>) IMF<sub>2</sub> component; (<b>c</b>) IMF<sub>3</sub> component; and (<b>d</b>) residual component.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Point P1 LS time-series prediction results (<b>left</b>) and enlarged view of test set (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Point P2 LS time-series prediction results (<b>left</b>) and enlarged view of test set (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Point P3 LS time-series prediction results (<b>left</b>) and enlarged view of test set (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Point P4 LS time-series prediction results (<b>left</b>) and enlarged view of test set (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Point P5 LS time-series prediction results (<b>left</b>) and enlarged view of test set (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of five AMEs on five LS points. (<b>a</b>) P1. (<b>b</b>) P2. (<b>c</b>) P3. (<b>d</b>) P4. (<b>e</b>) P5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>Comparison of five AMEs on five LS points. (<b>a</b>) P1. (<b>b</b>) P2. (<b>c</b>) P3. (<b>d</b>) P4. (<b>e</b>) P5.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop