Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (13)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = landslide aggregation index

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 7125 KiB  
Article
Change Characteristics of Soil Erodibility during Natural Restoration in an Earthquake Landslide of Southwestern China
by Jiangkun Zheng, Junxia Yan, Qiyang Chen, Wangyang Hu, Peng Zhao, Guirong Hou and Yong Wang
Forests 2024, 15(8), 1352; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15081352 - 2 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 863
Abstract
Landslides caused by earthquakes bring about dramatic changes in soil erodibility. In order to understand the change characteristics of soil erodibility during a vegetation restoration period after the 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake, a non-landslide area, landslide area, and transition area in Leigu Town, Beichuan [...] Read more.
Landslides caused by earthquakes bring about dramatic changes in soil erodibility. In order to understand the change characteristics of soil erodibility during a vegetation restoration period after the 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake, a non-landslide area, landslide area, and transition area in Leigu Town, Beichuan County were selected as research areas. Field soil sampling, geostatistics, and spatial interpolation were used to explore the spatiotemporal changes in soil physicochemical properties and soil erodibility during a natural restoration in 2013 (5 years after the earthquake) and in 2022 (14 years after the earthquake). The results showed that the comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEI) was mainly composed of five soil factors, which were soil pH, soil total nitrogen (TN), mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (MWD), fractal dimension of soil water stable aggregates (D), and soil erodibility (Kepic). The CSEI of the landslide area was slightly lower than that of the non-landslide area. The CSEI was gradually increasing during the process of natural restoration after earthquake. From 2013 to 2022, the increase rates of the CSEI were 6.9%, 10.0%, and 41.5% for the landslide area, non-landslide area, and transition area, respectively. Along attitude segments, the spatial distribution of soil erodibility in 2022 is more uniform than that in 2013. The higher value of CSEI was located in the upper part of research areas. The spatial distribution of the CSEI in 2013 and 2022 appeared as a moderate autocorrelation. The variable ranges of CSEI in 2013 and 2022 were about 20 m. In the early stage of vegetation restoration, soil and water conservation engineering was recommended in the landslide area. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Research areas and soil sampling points (The photo taken in 2013).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparisons of D among different research areas (<b>a</b>) and D among different altitude segments in landslide area (<b>b</b>), transition area (<b>c</b>), and non-landslide area (<b>d</b>). Data are expressed as means ± standard error. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different research areas (n = 15), and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different altitude segments for each research area (n = 3) at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparisons of MWD among different research areas (<b>a</b>) and MWD among different altitude segments in landslide area (<b>b</b>), transition area (<b>c</b>), and non-landslide area (<b>d</b>). Data are expressed as means ± standard error. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different research areas (n = 15), and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different altitude segments for each research area (n = 3) at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparisons of soil pH among different research areas (<b>a</b>) and soil pH among different altitude segments in landslide area (<b>b</b>), transition area (<b>c</b>), and non-landslide area (<b>d</b>). Data are expressed as means ± standard error. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different research areas (n = 15), and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different altitude segments for each research area (n = 3) at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparisons of soil TN among different research areas (<b>a</b>) and soil TN among different altitude segments in landslide area (<b>b</b>), transition area (<b>c</b>), and non-landslide area (<b>d</b>). Data are expressed as means ± standard error. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different research areas (n = 15), and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different altitude segments for each research area (n = 3) at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparisons of K<sub>epic</sub> among different research areas (<b>a</b>) and K<sub>epic</sub> among different altitude segments in landslide area (<b>b</b>), transition area (<b>c</b>), and non-landslide area (<b>d</b>). Data are expressed as means ± standard error. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different research areas (n = 15), and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different altitude segments for each research area (n = 3) at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparisons of CSEI among different research areas (<b>a</b>) and CSEI among different altitude segments in landslide area (<b>b</b>), transition area (<b>c</b>), and non-landslide area (<b>d</b>). Data are expressed as means ± standard error. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different research areas (n = 15), and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different altitude segments for each research area (n = 3) at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution map of comprehensive soil erodibility indicator (CSEI) of landslide area (<b>a</b>), transition area (<b>b</b>), non-landslide area (<b>c</b>) in 2013 and landslide area (<b>d</b>), transition area (<b>e</b>), non-landslide area (<b>f</b>) in 2022.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4607 KiB  
Article
Study on Road Network Vulnerability Considering the Risk of Landslide Geological Disasters in China’s Tibet
by Yunchang Yao, Liang Cheng, Song Chen, Hui Chen, Mingfei Chen, Ning Li, Zeming Li, Shengkun Dongye, Yifan Gu and Junfan Yi
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(17), 4221; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174221 - 28 Aug 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2437
Abstract
Road traffic is occasionally blocked by landslide geological disasters in remote mountainous areas, causing obstruction to economic society and national defense construction. It is vital to conduct landslide geological disaster risk assessment and vulnerability research on the road network. Based on landslide geological [...] Read more.
Road traffic is occasionally blocked by landslide geological disasters in remote mountainous areas, causing obstruction to economic society and national defense construction. It is vital to conduct landslide geological disaster risk assessment and vulnerability research on the road network. Based on landslide geological disaster risk on the road network, this study analyzed the potential effects of the main environmental elements. Due to the lack of previous research works, this study proposed an effective, rational, and understandable multicriteria heuristic analytical hierarchy process model, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and frequency ratio-interactive fuzzy stack analysis for vulnerability assessment of road networks in large and complex networks. Based on the comprehensive use of geographic information technology, the road network vulnerability of Tibet in China was evaluated by introducing slope, topographic relief, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), annual mean precipitation, distance from river drainage, glaciers and snow, habitation, seismic center and geological fault zone, and soil erosion intensity. According to the findings of the study, the three-stage framework proposed in this study can provide correct inferences and explanations for the potential phenomena of landslide geological disasters; the geological disaster risk are unevenly distributed in the study area; the distribution of the road network vulnerability in China’s Tibet significantly differs among different cities; the high-vulnerability section presents significant regional characteristics, which overlap with the area with a high risk of landslide geological disasters, and its distribution is mostly located in traffic arteries, link aggregations, and relatively frequent human activity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Geology and Mapping)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location map of study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Landslide environmental factors: (<b>a</b>) slope; (<b>b</b>) topographic relief; (<b>c</b>) NDVI; (<b>d</b>) annual mean precipitation; (<b>e</b>) distance from river system; (<b>f</b>) distance from glacier snow; (<b>g</b>) distance from geological fault zone; (<b>h</b>) soil erosion intensity; (<b>i</b>) distance from seismic center; and (<b>j</b>) distance from habitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Landslide environmental factors: (<b>a</b>) slope; (<b>b</b>) topographic relief; (<b>c</b>) NDVI; (<b>d</b>) annual mean precipitation; (<b>e</b>) distance from river system; (<b>f</b>) distance from glacier snow; (<b>g</b>) distance from geological fault zone; (<b>h</b>) soil erosion intensity; (<b>i</b>) distance from seismic center; and (<b>j</b>) distance from habitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Landslide frequency ratio curve of each evaluation index: (<b>a</b>) grade of slope; (<b>b</b>) grade of topographic relief; (<b>c</b>) grade of NDVI; (<b>d</b>) grade of mean annual precipitation; (<b>e</b>) grade of distance from river system; (<b>f</b>) grade of distance from glacial snow; (<b>g</b>) grade of distance from geological fault zone; (<b>h</b>) grade of soil erosion; (<b>i</b>) grade of distance from seismic center; and (<b>j</b>) grade of distance from habitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Landslide frequency ratio curve of each evaluation index: (<b>a</b>) grade of slope; (<b>b</b>) grade of topographic relief; (<b>c</b>) grade of NDVI; (<b>d</b>) grade of mean annual precipitation; (<b>e</b>) grade of distance from river system; (<b>f</b>) grade of distance from glacial snow; (<b>g</b>) grade of distance from geological fault zone; (<b>h</b>) grade of soil erosion; (<b>i</b>) grade of distance from seismic center; and (<b>j</b>) grade of distance from habitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Landslide geological disaster risk distribution in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Test sample distribution of landslide geological disasters at each level of risk.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Vulnerability level distribution of the main road network in the study area ((<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) are enlarged maps of typical high-risk road clusters, corresponding to the east, north, south and west of the study area respectively).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3929 KiB  
Article
Combining Statistical, Displacement and Damage Analyses to Study Slow-Moving Landslides Interacting with Roads: Two Case Studies in Southern Italy
by Gaetano Pecoraro, Gianfranco Nicodemo, Rosa Menichini, Davide Luongo, Dario Peduto and Michele Calvello
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 3368; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053368 - 6 Mar 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1791
Abstract
Slow-moving landslides are widespread natural hazards that can affect social and economic activities, causing damage to structures and infrastructures. This paper aims at proposing a procedure to analyze road damage induced by slow-moving landslides based on the joint use of landslide susceptibility maps, [...] Read more.
Slow-moving landslides are widespread natural hazards that can affect social and economic activities, causing damage to structures and infrastructures. This paper aims at proposing a procedure to analyze road damage induced by slow-moving landslides based on the joint use of landslide susceptibility maps, a road-damage database developed using Google Street View images and ground-displacement measurements derived from the interferometric processing of satellite SAR images. The procedure is applied to the municipalities of Vaglio Basilicata and Trivigno in the Basilicata region (southern Italy) following a matrix-based approach. First, a susceptibility analysis is carried out at the municipal scale, using data from landslide inventories and thematic information available over the entire municipalities. Then, the susceptibility index, the class of movement and the level of damage are calculated for the territorial units corresponding to the road corridors under investigation. Finally, the road networks are divided into stretches, each one characterized by a specific level of risk (or attention required) following the aggregation of the information provided by the performed analyses. The results highlight the importance of integrating all of these different approaches and data for obtaining quantitative information on the spatial and temporal behavior of slow-moving landslides affecting road networks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Earth Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Procedure to study the interaction between slow-moving landslides and the road network at the municipal level by combining information from susceptibility maps, DInSAR data analyses and damage surveys.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Aerial photos of Vaglio Basilicata (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and Trivigno (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>). (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) show the slow-moving landslides inventoried by the Interregional River Basin Authority of Basilicata and the spatial distribution of DInSAR velocities (road sections surveyed are marked in black) within the two municipalities. (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) focus on the main road stretches connecting highway SS407 Basentana to the two city centers. The insets show the location of the two municipalities within the Basilicata region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Receiver operating characteristic curves for the landslide susceptibility zoning maps obtained applying different focal statistic characteristic dimensions for Vaglio Basilicata (<b>a</b>) and Trivigno (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Landslide susceptibility maps at the municipal scale defined employing focal statistics techniques with characteristic dimension equal to 7. Slow-moving landslides recorded in the two test areas are also reported. The inset shows the location of the two municipalities within the Basilicata region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Maps of the slow-moving landslides for Vaglio Basilicata (<b>a</b>) and Trivigno (<b>c</b>) distinguished according to the average DInSAR-derived velocity values with close-up view of yearly V<sub>LOS</sub> of analyzed coherent DInSAR benchmarks and assumed as indicators of a state of movement for the TZU<sub>road</sub> in Vaglio Basilicata (<b>b</b>) and Trivigno (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Maps of damaged road stretches with severity levels resulting from the damage classification using Google Street View imagery dated August 2021 for Vaglio Basilicata (<b>a</b>) and March 2021 for Trivigno (<b>b</b>). Percentages of damaged road distinguished according to the four (D0–D3) damage severity levels are also reported (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Excerpts of maps produced by the procedure in two small portions of the study area in Vaglio Basilicata (<b>a</b>) and Trivigno (<b>b</b>). The tables below report the correlation matrices obtained for the classification carried out over the entire territory of the two study areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Classification of the investigated stretches of roads in different levels of risk and attention resulting from the application of the proposed methodology in two study areas of the municipalities of Vaglio Basilicata (<b>a</b>) and Trivigno (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 8520 KiB  
Article
A Novel Deep Learning Method for Automatic Recognition of Coseismic Landslides
by Qiyuan Yang, Xianmin Wang, Xinlong Zhang, Jianping Zheng, Yu Ke, Lizhe Wang and Haixiang Guo
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(4), 977; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15040977 - 10 Feb 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2901
Abstract
Massive earthquakes generally trigger thousands of coseismic landslides. The automatic recognition of these numerous landslides has provided crucial support for post-earthquake emergency rescue, landslide risk mitigation, and city reconstruction. The automatic recognition of coseismic landslides has always been a difficult problem due to [...] Read more.
Massive earthquakes generally trigger thousands of coseismic landslides. The automatic recognition of these numerous landslides has provided crucial support for post-earthquake emergency rescue, landslide risk mitigation, and city reconstruction. The automatic recognition of coseismic landslides has always been a difficult problem due to the relatively small size of a landslide and various complicated environmental backgrounds. This work proposes a novel semantic segmentation network, EGCN, to improve the landslide identification accuracy. EGCN conducts coseismic landslide recognition by a recognition index set as the input data, CGBlock as the basic module, and U-Net as the baseline. The CGBlock module can extract the relatively stable global context-dependent features (global context features) and the unstable local features by the GNN Branch and CNN Branch (GNN Branch contains the proposed EISGNN) and integrates them via adaptive weights. This method has four advantages. (1) The recognition indices are established according to the causal mechanism of coseismic landslides. The rationality of the indices guarantees the accuracy of landslide recognition. (2) The module of EISGNN is suggested based on the entropy importance coefficient and GATv2. Owing to the feature aggregation among nodes with high entropy importance, global and useful context dependency can be synthesized and the false alarm of landslide recognition can be reduced. (3) CGBlock automatically integrates context features and local spatial features, and has strong adaptability for the recognition of coseismic landslides located in different environments. (4) Owing to CGBlock being the basic module and U-Net being the baseline, EGCN can integrate the context features and local spatial characteristics at both high and low levels. Thus, the accuracy of landslide recognition can be improved. The meizoseismal region of the Ms 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake is selected as an example to conduct coseismic landslide recognition. The values of the precision indices of Overall Accuracy, mIoU, Kappa, F1-score, Precision, and Recall reached 0.99854, 0.99709, 0.97321, 0.97396, 0.97344, and 0.97422, respectively. The proposed method outperforms the current major deep learning methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview diagram of the study area. PGA indicates the peak ground acceleration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technology flow chart of coseismic landslide recognition. (<b>a</b>) Framework diagram for landslide identification. (<b>b</b>) Structure of the graph neural network EISGNN. The left branch indicates the GATv2 attention aggregation process, and the right branch exhibits the selective aggregation strategy based on the top-<span class="html-italic">k</span> entropy importance coefficients. (<b>c</b>) Structure of CGBlock integrating the CNN and GCN branches. (<b>d</b>) General structure of EGCN with CGBlock as a basic block; the detailed structure of the EGCN is introduced in <a href="#sec3dot4-remotesensing-15-00977" class="html-sec">Section 3.4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>General structure of CGBlock.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Graph definition layer. The context structure is extracted by the top-<span class="html-italic">k</span> selection strategy based on L2 distance. For a pixel <span class="html-italic">i</span>, the pixels with the top-<span class="html-italic">k</span> highest relative scores are selected (i.e., red elements in Line <span class="html-italic">i</span> in the distance matrix). The selected <span class="html-italic">k</span> pixels in different spatial positions constitute the context structure of Pixel <span class="html-italic">i</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Structure of the EGCN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Recognition results of the proposed EGCN. Regions A, B, and C and subfigures (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) are six subregions in the testing set. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are the subparts of (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of the identification results of 8 methods in Region A. Bold values mean the highest number of the corresponding evaluation criterion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of the identification results of 8 methods in Region B. Bold values mean the highest number of the corresponding evaluation criterion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of the identification results of 8 methods in Region C. Bold values mean the highest number of the corresponding evaluation criterion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Some field validation photos of coseismic landslides. Photos (1)–(17) show 17 typical cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Test accuracy evaluation and comparison among 8 algorithms. Bold values mean the highest number of the corresponding evaluation criterion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Ablation experiment settings of network hyperparameters. The red parameters indicate the parts that changed in ablation experiments. (<b>a</b>) Original structure of CGBlock, with a CNN branch on the left and a GNN branch on the right. (<b>b</b>) CGBlock after the GNN branch is replaced by an attention module. (<b>c</b>) Different numbers of pixels selected to construct a graph. <span class="html-italic">k</span> indicates the pixel number in the selective aggregation. (<b>d</b>) Different numbers of neighbor nodes in feature aggregation. <span class="html-italic">m</span> indicates the number of selected neighbor nodes.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 10101 KiB  
Article
Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Considering Neighborhood Characteristics of Landslide Spatial Datasets and Hydrological Slope Units Using Remote Sensing and GIS Technologies
by Faming Huang, Siyu Tao, Deying Li, Zhipeng Lian, Filippo Catani, Jinsong Huang, Kailong Li and Chuhong Zhang
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(18), 4436; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14184436 - 6 Sep 2022
Cited by 39 | Viewed by 3484
Abstract
Landslides are affected not only by their own environmental factors, but also by the neighborhood environmental factors and the landslide clustering effect, which are represented as the neighborhood characteristics of modelling spatial datasets in landslide susceptibility prediction (LSP). This study aims to innovatively [...] Read more.
Landslides are affected not only by their own environmental factors, but also by the neighborhood environmental factors and the landslide clustering effect, which are represented as the neighborhood characteristics of modelling spatial datasets in landslide susceptibility prediction (LSP). This study aims to innovatively explore the neighborhood characteristics of landslide spatial datasets for reducing the LSP uncertainty. Neighborhood environmental factors were acquired and managed by remote sensing (RS) and the geographic information system (GIS), then used to represent the influence of landslide neighborhood environmental factors. The landslide aggregation index (LAI) was proposed to represent the landslide clustering effect in GIS. Taking Chongyi County, China, as example, and using the hydrological slope unit as the mapping unit, 12 environmental factors including elevation, slope, aspect, profile curvature, plan curvature, topographic relief, lithology, gully density, annual average rainfall, NDVI, NDBI, and road density were selected. Next, the support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) were selected to perform LSP considering the neighborhood characteristics of landslide spatial datasets based on hydrologic slope units. Meanwhile, a grid-based model was also established for comparison. Finally, the LSP uncertainties were analyzed from the prediction accuracy and the distribution patterns of landslide susceptibility indexes (LSIs). Results showed that the improved frequency ratio method using LAI and neighborhood environmental factors can effectively ensure the LSP accuracy, and it was significantly higher than the LSP results without considering the neighborhood conditions. Furthermore, the Wilcoxon rank test in nonparametric test indicates that the neighborhood characteristics of spatial datasets had a great positive influence on the LSP performance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The process of LSP modelling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of slope unit extraction using the hydrological method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Degree of aggregation of landslides in two cases. (<b>a</b>) Case a; (<b>b</b>) Case b.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Landslide distribution of Chongyi City.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Environmental factors: (<b>a</b>) elevation; (<b>b</b>) slope; (<b>c</b>) aspect; (<b>d</b>) profile curvature; (<b>e</b>) topographic relief; (<b>f</b>) lithology; (<b>g</b>) annual rainfall; (<b>h</b>) NDVI; (<b>i</b>) NDBI. (Road density, plane curvature and river density are not present).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Slope units extracted by the hydrological method. (<b>a</b>) Hydrological-Case1; (<b>b</b>) Hydrological-Case2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>LSP under different combination conditions based on the SVM model. (<b>a</b>) Slope-based SVM; (<b>b</b>) Slope–landslide aggregation-based SVM; (<b>c</b>) Slope–neighborhood factors-based SVM; (<b>d</b>) Slope–neighborhood datasets-based SVM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>LSP under different combination conditions based on the RF model. (<b>a</b>) Slope-based RF; (<b>b</b>) Slope–landslide aggregation-based RF; (<b>c</b>) Slope–neighborhood factors-based RF; (<b>d</b>) Slope–neighborhood datasets-based RF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The ROC under different combination conditions. (<b>a</b>) The AUC of SVM; (<b>b</b>) The AUC of RF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Distribution patterns of LSIs based on the RF model. (<b>a</b>) Grid-based RF; (<b>b</b>) Slope-based RF; (<b>c</b>) Slope–landslide aggregation-based RF; (<b>d</b>) Slope–neighborhood factors-based RF; (<b>e</b>) Slope–neighborhood datasets-based RF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Landslide susceptibility map results using the grid units. (<b>a</b>) Grid-based SVM; (<b>b</b>) Grid-based RF.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 5415 KiB  
Article
Predicting Landslides Susceptible Zones in the Lesser Himalayas by Ensemble of Per Pixel and Object-Based Models
by Ujjwal Sur, Prafull Singh, Sansar Raj Meena and Trilok Nath Singh
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(8), 1953; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14081953 - 18 Apr 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3574
Abstract
Landslide susceptibility is a contemporary method for delineation of landslide hazard zones and holistically mitigating the future landslides risks for planning and decision-making. The significance of this study is that it would be the first instance when the ‘geon’ model will be attempted [...] Read more.
Landslide susceptibility is a contemporary method for delineation of landslide hazard zones and holistically mitigating the future landslides risks for planning and decision-making. The significance of this study is that it would be the first instance when the ‘geon’ model will be attempted to delineate landslide susceptibility map (LSM) for the complex lesser Himalayan topography as a contemporary LSM technique. This study adopted the per-pixel-based ensemble approaches through modified frequency ratio (MFR) and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and compared it with the ‘geons’ (object-based) aggregation method to produce an LSM for the lesser Himalayan Kalsi-Chakrata road corridor. For the landslide susceptibility models, 14 landslide conditioning factors were carefully chosen; namely, slope, slope aspect, elevation, lithology, rainfall, seismicity, normalized differential vegetation index, stream power index, land use/land cover, soil, topographical wetness index, and proximity to drainage, road, and fault. The inventory data for the past landslides were derived from preceding satellite images, intensive field surveys, and validation surveys. These inventory data were divided into training and test datasets following the commonly accepted 70:30 ratio. The GIS-based statistical techniques were adopted to establish the correlation between landslide training sites and conditioning factors. To determine the accuracy of the model output, the LSMs accuracy was validated through statistical methods of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and relative landslide density index (R-index). The accuracy results indicate that the object-based geon methods produced higher accuracy (geon FAHP: 0.934; geon MFR: 0.910) over the per-pixel approaches (FAHP: 0.887; MFR: 0.841). The results noticeably showed that the geon method constructs significant regional units for future mitigation strategies and development. The present study may significantly benefit the decision-makers and regional planners in selecting the appropriate risk mitigation procedures at a local scale to counter the potential damages and losses from landslides in the area. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Location map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Active landslides along the Kalsi-Chakrata road corridor, (<b>a</b>) Rock Fall between Chapanu and Sahiya, (<b>b</b>) Amroha landslide site in 2017, retaining wall damaged.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Landslide inventory along the Kalsi-Chakrata road corridor showing spatial distribution of (<b>a</b>) the test and training sites selected for model building, (<b>b</b>) landslide area in polygon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Landslide conditioning factors used in this study- (<b>a</b>) slope angle, (<b>b</b>) aspect, (<b>c</b>) elevation, (<b>d</b>) distance to drainage, (<b>e</b>) lithological units, (<b>f</b>) landuse/landcover (LULC), (<b>g</b>) soil, (<b>h</b>) NDVI, (<b>i</b>) rainfall, (<b>j</b>) seismicity, (<b>k</b>) distance to road, (<b>l</b>) distance to faults, (<b>m</b>) TWI and (<b>n</b>) SPI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Landslide conditioning factors used in this study- (<b>a</b>) slope angle, (<b>b</b>) aspect, (<b>c</b>) elevation, (<b>d</b>) distance to drainage, (<b>e</b>) lithological units, (<b>f</b>) landuse/landcover (LULC), (<b>g</b>) soil, (<b>h</b>) NDVI, (<b>i</b>) rainfall, (<b>j</b>) seismicity, (<b>k</b>) distance to road, (<b>l</b>) distance to faults, (<b>m</b>) TWI and (<b>n</b>) SPI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Methodology adopted for this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>LSI Mapping using (<b>a</b>) MFR model; (<b>b</b>) FAHP model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Percentage area under landslide susceptible zones obtained from the (<b>a</b>) MFR; (<b>b</b>) FAHP; (<b>c</b>) Geon MFR; (<b>d</b>) Geon FAHP models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>LSI Mapping using (<b>a</b>) MFR geons; (<b>b</b>) FAHP geons for the Kalsi-Chakrata road corridor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>ROC curve showing the precision for the MFR, FAHP, geon MFR and geon FAHP models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>R-Index for LSI Classes.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 10956 KiB  
Article
Susceptibility Analysis of Geohazards in the Longmen Mountain Region after the Wenchuan Earthquake
by Shuai Li, Zhongyun Ni, Yinbing Zhao, Wei Hu, Zhenrui Long, Haiyu Ma, Guoli Zhou, Yuhao Luo and Chuntao Geng
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(6), 3229; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063229 - 9 Mar 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2953
Abstract
Multitemporal geohazard susceptibility analysis can not only provide reliable results but can also help identify the differences in the mechanisms of different elements under different temporal and spatial backgrounds, so as to better accurately prevent and control geohazards. Here, we studied the 12 [...] Read more.
Multitemporal geohazard susceptibility analysis can not only provide reliable results but can also help identify the differences in the mechanisms of different elements under different temporal and spatial backgrounds, so as to better accurately prevent and control geohazards. Here, we studied the 12 counties (cities) that were severely affected by the Wenchuan earthquake of 12 May 2008. Our study was divided into four time periods: 2008, 2009–2012, 2013, and 2014–2017. Common geohazards in the study area, such as landslides, collapses and debris flows, were taken into account. We constructed a geohazard susceptibility index evaluation system that included topography, geology, land cover, meteorology, hydrology, and human activities. Then we used a random forest model to study the changes in geohazard susceptibility during the Wenchuan earthquake, the following ten years, and its driving mechanisms. We had four main findings. (1) The susceptibility of geohazards from 2008 to 2017 gradually increased and their spatial distribution was significantly correlated with the main faults and rivers. (2) The Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault, the western section of the Jiangyou-Dujiangyan Fault, and the Minjiang and Fujiang rivers were highly susceptible to geohazards, and changes in geohazard susceptibility mainly occurred along the Pingwu-Qingchuan Fault, the eastern section of the Jiangyou-Dujiangyan Fault, and the riparian areas of the Mianyuan River, Zagunao River, Tongkou River, Baicao River, and other secondary rivers. (3) The relative contribution of topographic factors to geohazards in the four different periods was stable, geological factors slowly decreased, and meteorological and hydrological factors increased. In addition, the impact of land cover in 2008 was more significant than during other periods, and the impact of human activities had an upward trend from 2008 to 2017. (4) Elevation and slope had significant topographical effects, coupled with the geological environmental effects of engineering rock groups and faults, and river-derived effects, which resulted in a spatial aggregation of geohazard susceptibility. We attributed the dynamic changes in the areas that were highly susceptible to geohazards around the faults and rivers to the changes in the intensity of earthquakes and precipitation in different periods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geohazard inventory map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Thematic maps of impact factors: (<b>a</b>) elevation; (<b>b</b>) slope; (<b>c</b>) slope position; (<b>d</b>) aspect; (<b>e</b>) engineering rock group; (<b>f</b>) weighted Euclidean distance of fault; (<b>g</b>) earthquake intensity; (<b>h</b>) peak ground acceleration; (<b>i</b>) NDVI; (<b>j</b>) land use; (<b>k</b>) precipitation; (<b>l</b>) Euclidean distance of river; (<b>m</b>) POI kernel density; and (<b>n</b>) weighted Euclidean distance of road.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Study flow chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>ROC curve and AUC value in four periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Geohazard susceptibility in four periods: (<b>a</b>) 2008 (I); (<b>b</b>) 2009–2012 (II); (<b>c</b>) 2013 (III); and (<b>d</b>) 2014–2017 (IV).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Geohazard susceptibility in four periods: (<b>a</b>) 2008 (I); (<b>b</b>) 2009–2012 (II); (<b>c</b>) 2013 (III); and (<b>d</b>) 2014–2017 (IV).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Synthesis of four periods of geohazard susceptibility: (<b>a</b>) high susceptibility intersection diagram in four periods (I is 2008; II is 2009–2012; III is 2013; IV is 2014–2017); and (<b>b</b>) geohazard susceptibility in 2008–2017.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Importance of impact factors in four periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Partial dependence plot in continuous factor: (<b>a</b>) elevation; (<b>b</b>) slope; (<b>c</b>) WEDF; (<b>d</b>) EI (from 2 to 7 is intensity VII to intensity XI); (<b>e</b>) PGA; (<b>f</b>) NDVI; (<b>g</b>) precipitation; (<b>h</b>) EDR; (<b>i</b>) POI kernel density; and (<b>j</b>) WEDR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Partial dependence plot in category factor: (<b>a</b>) slope position; (<b>b</b>) aspect; (<b>c</b>) ERG (E1 is extrusive rock; E2 is solum; E3 is intrusive rock; E4 is carbonate rock; E5 is fine-coarse clastic rock; E6 is fine-medium clastic rock; E7 is carbonate rock intercalated clastic rock; E8 is metamorphic rock; E9 is fine clastic rock; E10 is clastic rock intercalated carbonate rock; and E11 is metamorphic rock intercalated carbonate rock); and (<b>d</b>) land use.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Training set and testing set in four periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Thematic maps of dynamic factor in other periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2 Cont.
<p>Thematic maps of dynamic factor in other periods.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 5438 KiB  
Article
Definition of Environmental Indicators for a Fast Estimation of Landslide Risk at National Scale
by Samuele Segoni and Francesco Caleca
Land 2021, 10(6), 621; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060621 - 9 Jun 2021
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 3745
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to propose a new set of environmental indicators for the fast estimation of landslide risk over very wide areas. Using Italy (301,340 km2) as a test case, landslide susceptibility maps and soil sealing/land consumption maps [...] Read more.
The purpose of this paper is to propose a new set of environmental indicators for the fast estimation of landslide risk over very wide areas. Using Italy (301,340 km2) as a test case, landslide susceptibility maps and soil sealing/land consumption maps were combined to derive a spatially distributed indicator (LRI—landslide risk index), then an aggregation was performed using Italian municipalities as basic spatial units. Two indicators were defined, namely ALR (averaged landslide risk) and TLR (total landslide risk). All data were processed using GIS programs. Conceptually, landslide susceptibility maps account for landslide hazard while soil sealing maps account for the spatial distribution of anthropic elements exposed to risk (including buildings, infrastructure, and services). The indexes quantify how much the two issues overlap, producing a relevant risk and can be used to evaluate how each municipality has been prudent in planning sustainable urban growth to cope with landslide risk. The proposed indexes are indicators that are simple to understand, can be adapted to various contexts and at various scales, and could be periodically updated, with very low effort, making use of the products of ongoing governmental monitoring programs of Italian environment. Of course, the indicators represent an oversimplification of the complexity of landslide risk, but this is the first time that a landslide risk indicator has been defined in Italy at the national scale, starting from landslide susceptibility maps (although Italy is one of the European countries most affected by hydro-geological hazards) and, more in general, the first time that land consumption maps are integrated into a landslide risk assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Landslide Hazard and Environment Risk Assessment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Overview of Italy; (<b>b</b>) administrative subdivision into 7904 municipalities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Hazard index map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Landslide Risk Index (LRI) map for the whole Italian territory; (<b>b</b>) Focus on hazard index map; (<b>c</b>) Focus on LRI map. Roads and buildings are from OpenStreetMap dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Characterization of the Italian municipalities with the Total Landslide Risk (TLR) index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Characterization of the Italian municipalities with the Average Landslide Risk (ALR) index; (<b>b</b>) Focus on the Amalfi Coast, where seven municipalities are ranked among the 10 Italian municipalities with the highest ALR value.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 4134 KiB  
Article
Characteristics of Rainfall Events Triggering Landslides in Two Climatologically Different Areas: Southern Ecuador and Southern Spain
by José Antonio Palenzuela Baena, John Soto Luzuriaga and Clemente Irigaray Fernández
Hydrology 2020, 7(3), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7030045 - 21 Jul 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3377
Abstract
In the research field on landslide hazard assessment for natural risk prediction and mitigation, it is necessary to know the characteristics of the triggering factors, such as rainfall and earthquakes, as well as possible. This work aims to generate and compare the basic [...] Read more.
In the research field on landslide hazard assessment for natural risk prediction and mitigation, it is necessary to know the characteristics of the triggering factors, such as rainfall and earthquakes, as well as possible. This work aims to generate and compare the basic information on rainfall events triggering landslides in two areas with different climate and geological settings: the Loja Basin in southern Ecuador and the southern part of the province of Granada in Spain. In addition, this paper gives preliminary insights on the correlation between these rainfall events and major climate cycles affecting each of these study areas. To achieve these objectives, the information on previous studies on these areas was compiled and supplemented to obtain and compare Critical Rainfall Threshold (CRT). Additionally, a seven-month series of accumulated rainfall and mean climate indices were calculated from daily rainfall and monthly climate, respectively. This enabled the correlation between both rainfall and climate cycles. For both study areas, the CRT functions were fitted including the confidence and prediction bounds, and their statistical significance was also assessed. However, to overcome the major difficulties to characterize each landslide event, the rainfall events associated with every landslide are deduced from the spikes showing uncommon return periods cumulative rainfall. Thus, the method used, which has been developed by the authors in previous research, avoids the need to preselect specific rainfall durations for each type of landslide. The information extracted from the findings of this work show that for the wetter area of Ecuador, CRT presents a lower scale factor indicating that lower values of accumulated rainfall are needed to trigger a landslide in this area. This is most likely attributed to the high soil saturation. The separate analysis of the landslide types in the case of southern Granada show very low statistical significance for translational slides, as a low number of data could be identified. However, better fit was obtained for rock falls, complex slides, and the global fit considering all landslide types with R2 values close to one. In the case of the Loja Basin, the ENSO (El Niño Southern Oscillation) cycle shows a moderate positive correlation with accumulated rainfall in the wettest period, while for the case of the south of the province of Granada, a positive correlation was found between the NAO (North Atlantic Oscillation) and the WeMO (Western Mediterranean Oscillation) climate time series and the accumulated rainfall. This correlation is highlighted when the aggregation (NAO + WeMO) of both climate indices is considered, reaching a Pearson coefficient of –0.55, and exceeding the average of the negative values of this combined index with significant rates in the hydrological years showing a higher number of documented landslides. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall-Induced Landslides Hazard)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study areas. Basemap from ArcGIS<sup>®</sup> World Imagery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Histogram of the mean monthly precipitation for both study areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Examples of geological sections in the area of the Loja Basin, in the directions NE-SW (<b>a</b>) and in the direction SW-NE (<b>b</b>). Taken from [<a href="#B74-hydrology-07-00045" class="html-bibr">74</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mean values and heights of the rainfall gauges of southern Granada.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatter plots of the rainfall thresholds and the fitted CRTs: (<b>a</b>) fitted curve for low to very low mass movements in the Loja Basin (modified from [<a href="#B5-hydrology-07-00045" class="html-bibr">5</a>]); (<b>b</b>–<b>e</b>) are fitted curves for the translational slides, rock falls, complex landslides, and all the landslide types, respectively, in southern Granada. Dash-dotted line: curve fit to lower values Rainfall-Duration; solid line: confidence bounds; dashed line: prediction bounds. Red points are the manually selected points to fit the CRT curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Scatter plots of the rainfall thresholds and the fitted CRTs: (<b>a</b>) fitted curve for low to very low mass movements in the Loja Basin (modified from [<a href="#B5-hydrology-07-00045" class="html-bibr">5</a>]); (<b>b</b>–<b>e</b>) are fitted curves for the translational slides, rock falls, complex landslides, and all the landslide types, respectively, in southern Granada. Dash-dotted line: curve fit to lower values Rainfall-Duration; solid line: confidence bounds; dashed line: prediction bounds. Red points are the manually selected points to fit the CRT curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Graph of the differences after subtracting the general trend from the accumulated rainfall observed for the wet seasons October–April (dotted line) and the more significant climate indices (solid line): (<b>a</b>) graph for the Loja Basin including the ENSO index; (<b>b</b>) graph for the Loja Basin including the ENSO index for the monthly scale and the regression line of the ENSO index; (<b>c</b>) graph southern Granada including the NAO index; (<b>d</b>) graph for southern Granada including the WeMO index; (<b>e</b>) graph for southern Granada including the aggregation of NAO and WeMO indices. Triangles represent the relative quantity of documented landslides by year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Graph of the differences after subtracting the general trend from the accumulated rainfall observed for the wet seasons October–April (dotted line) and the more significant climate indices (solid line): (<b>a</b>) graph for the Loja Basin including the ENSO index; (<b>b</b>) graph for the Loja Basin including the ENSO index for the monthly scale and the regression line of the ENSO index; (<b>c</b>) graph southern Granada including the NAO index; (<b>d</b>) graph for southern Granada including the WeMO index; (<b>e</b>) graph for southern Granada including the aggregation of NAO and WeMO indices. Triangles represent the relative quantity of documented landslides by year.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 14429 KiB  
Article
Different Approaches to Use Morphometric Attributes in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Meso-Scale Spatial Units: A Case Study in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
by Vanessa Canavesi, Samuele Segoni, Ascanio Rosi, Xiao Ting, Tulius Nery, Filippo Catani and Nicola Casagli
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(11), 1826; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111826 - 5 Jun 2020
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 4324
Abstract
Landslide susceptibility maps are widely used in landslide hazard management. Although many models have been proposed, mapping unit definition is a matter that still needs to be fully examined. In the literature, the most reported mapping units are pixels and slope units, while [...] Read more.
Landslide susceptibility maps are widely used in landslide hazard management. Although many models have been proposed, mapping unit definition is a matter that still needs to be fully examined. In the literature, the most reported mapping units are pixels and slope units, while in this work, developed in the Rio de Janeiro region (Brazil), the use of drainage basins as a mapping unit is examined; even if their use leads to the definition of maps with a coarser spatial resolution than pixels-based maps, they convey information that can be easily and rapidly handled by civil defense organizations. However, for the morphometrical characterization of entire basins, a standardized procedure does not exist, and the susceptibility results may be sensitive to the approach used. To investigate this issue, a random forest model was used to assess landslide susceptibility, using 12 independent variables: four categorical (land use, soil type, lithology and slope orientation) and eight numerical variables (slope gradient, elevation, slope curvature, profile curvature, planar curvature, flow accumulation, topographic wetness index, stream power index). For each basin, the numerical variables were aggregated according to different approaches, which, in turn, were used to set up four different model configurations: i) maximum values, ii) mean values, iii) standard deviation values, iv) joint use of all the above. The resulting maps showed noticeable differences and a quantitative validation procedure showed that the best configurations were the ones based on mean values of independent variables, and the one based on the combination of all the values of the numerical variables. The main outcomes of this work consist of a landslide susceptibility map of the study area, to be used in operational procedures of risk management and in some insights on the best approaches to aggregate raster cell data into wider spatial units. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Landslide Monitoring, Mapping and Modeling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area location (<b>a</b>) and its elevation map (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow showing the main steps of the research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Nova friburgo landslide scars mapped on the google earth image in 19 January 2011.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Landsat images used for the classification process (orbit 216, scenes 075 and 076 (09/04/2011) and orbit 217, scenes 075 and 076 (08/28/2011)). color composition rgb 543.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Land use and land cover map in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Susceptibility maps generated with the four different model configurations: (<b>a</b>) mean, (<b>b</b>) maximum, (<b>c</b>) standard deviation and (<b>d</b>) all.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Difference among the maximum and minimum susceptibility values mapped by the four model configurations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Receiver operating characteristic (roc) curves of the four model configurations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Ranking of the parameters used in the best performing configurations, according to their importance estimated by the out of bag error (<b>a</b>): using mean configuration and (<b>b</b>): using all parameters together). see <a href="#remotesensing-12-01826-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> for details on the variables used.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Soil Map in the study area. Scale 1:100.000. Source the Rio de Janeiro Environmental Secretariat.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Lithology Map. Scale 1:100.000. Source: CPRM—Brazilian Geological Survey.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Aspect Map.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Slope Map.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>Curvature Map.</p>
Full article ">Figure A6
<p>Profile Curvature Map.</p>
Full article ">Figure A7
<p>Planar Curvature Map.</p>
Full article ">Figure A8
<p>Flow Accumulation Map.</p>
Full article ">Figure A9
<p>TWI Map.</p>
Full article ">Figure A10
<p>SPI Map.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 4628 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Hazard Assessment of Landslides Using the Levenburg–Marquardt Back Propagation Neural Network Method in a Pipeline Area
by Junnan Xiong, Jin Li, Hao Zhang, Ming Sun and Weiming Cheng
Geosciences 2019, 9(10), 449; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9100449 - 21 Oct 2019
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3344
Abstract
Pipelines are exposed to the severe threat of natural disasters, where the damage caused by landslides are particularly bad. Hence, in the route arrangement and maintenance management of pipeline projects, it is particularly important to evaluate the regional landslide hazards in advance. However, [...] Read more.
Pipelines are exposed to the severe threat of natural disasters, where the damage caused by landslides are particularly bad. Hence, in the route arrangement and maintenance management of pipeline projects, it is particularly important to evaluate the regional landslide hazards in advance. However, most models are based on the subjective determination of evaluation factors and index weights; this study establishes a quantitative hazard assessment model based on the location of historical landslides and the Levenberg–Marquardt Back Propagation (LM-BP) Neural Network model was applied to the pipeline area. We established an evaluation index system by analyzing the spatial patterns of single assessment factors and the mechanism of landslides. Then, different from previous studies, we built the standard sample matrix of the LM-BP neural network by using interpolation theory to avoid the serious influence of human factors on the hazard assessment. Finally, we used the standard sample matrix and the historical data to learn, train, test, and simulate future results. Our results showed 33 slopes with low hazard (accounting for 10.48% of the total number of slopes and corresponding to approximately 32.63 km2), 62 slopes with moderate hazard (accounting for 19.68% of the total number of slopes and corresponding to approximately 65.53 km2), 112 slopes with high hazard (accounting for 35.56% of the total number of slopes and corresponding to approximately 123.55 km2), and 108 slopes with extremely high hazard (accounting for 34.29% of the total number of slopes and corresponding to approximately 150.65 km2). Local spatial autocorrelation analysis indicated that there are significant “high–high” and “low–low” aggregation of landslide hazards in the pipeline area. By comparing the model results with the past landslides, new landslides and landslide potential points, its prediction capability and accuracy were confirmed. On the basis of the results, our study has developed effective risk prevention and mitigation strategies in mountain areas to promote pipeline safety. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location and field environment of the study area in Guangyuan city, Sichuan, China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart for obtaining slope (<b>a</b>) and all slope units (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial patterns of single indicator in each slope unit: (<b>a</b>) elevation, (<b>b</b>) slope, (<b>c</b>) aspect, (<b>d</b>) height difference, and (<b>e</b>) topographic profile curvature (TPC).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial patterns of single index in each slope unit: (<b>a</b>) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), (<b>b</b>) normalized difference water body index (NDWI), (<b>c</b>) main lithology, (<b>d</b>) distance from the fault, (<b>e</b>) annual mean rainfall (AAR), and (<b>f</b>) variation coefficient of precipitation (CVP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Correlation coefficient between evaluation indexes for hazard assessment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Frequency distribution of historical landslide in each evaluation indicator: (<b>a</b>) elevation, (<b>b</b>) slope, (<b>c</b>) aspect, (<b>d</b>) height difference, (<b>e</b>) topographic profile curvature (TPC), (<b>f</b>) NDVI, (<b>g</b>) AAR, and (<b>h</b>) distance from the fault.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Training results of the LM-BP neural network (<b>a</b>) and Convergent curve (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Final landslide hazard map for the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distribution pattern of local indicators of spatial association (LISAs) for the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Assessment result for prediction capability analysis. The spatial distribution characteristic (<b>a</b>) and the statistical results (<b>b</b>) of new landslides from 2015 to 2018. The spatial distribution characteristic (<b>c</b>) and the statistical results (<b>d</b>) of landslide potential points in 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The spatial distribution characteristics of 10 min rainfall (<b>a</b>) and 1 h rainfall (<b>b</b>) in the study area.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 7908 KiB  
Article
The Application of the Hybrid GIS Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Best–Worst Methodology for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
by Ljubomir Gigović, Siniša Drobnjak and Dragan Pamučar
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8(2), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8020079 - 12 Feb 2019
Cited by 46 | Viewed by 5218
Abstract
The main goal of this article is to produce a landslide susceptibility map by using the hybrid Geographical Information System (GIS) spatial multi-criteria decision analysis best–worst methodology (MCDA-BWM) in the western part of the Republic of Serbia. Initially, a landslide inventory map was [...] Read more.
The main goal of this article is to produce a landslide susceptibility map by using the hybrid Geographical Information System (GIS) spatial multi-criteria decision analysis best–worst methodology (MCDA-BWM) in the western part of the Republic of Serbia. Initially, a landslide inventory map was prepared using the National Landslide Database, aerial photographs, and also by carrying out field surveys. A total of 1082 landslide locations were detected. This methodology considers the fifteen conditioning factors that are relevant to landslide susceptibility mapping: the elevation, slope, aspect, distance to the road network, distance to the river, distance to faults, lithology, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), the Stream Power Index (SPI), the Sediment Transport Index (STI), annual rainfall, the distance to urban areas, and the land use/cover. The expert evaluation takes into account the nature and severity of the observed criteria, and it was tested by using two scenarios: the different aggregation methods of the BWM. The prediction performances of the generated maps were checked by the receiver operating characteristics (ROCs). The validation results confirmed that the areas under the ROC curve for the weighted linear combination (WLC) and the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) aggregation methods of the MCDA-BWM have a very high accuracy. The results of the landslide susceptibility assessment obtained by applying the proposed best–worst method were the first step in the development of landslide risk management and they are expected to be used by local governments for effective management planning purposes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location of the study area (Mačva and Kolubara Districts, and the Tara National Park).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The flowchart of the applied methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The topographical factors related to landslides: (<b>a</b>) the elevation; (<b>b</b>) the aspect; (<b>c</b>) the slope; (<b>d</b>) the topographic wetness index (TWI); (<b>e</b>) the stream power index (SPI); (<b>f</b>) the sediment transport index (STI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The environmental factors related to landslides: (<b>a</b>) the soil type, (<b>b</b>) the distance to the river, (<b>c</b>) lithology, (<b>d</b>) the distance to faults, (<b>e</b>) the NDVI, (<b>f</b>) rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>The environmental factors related to landslides: (<b>a</b>) the soil type, (<b>b</b>) the distance to the river, (<b>c</b>) lithology, (<b>d</b>) the distance to faults, (<b>e</b>) the NDVI, (<b>f</b>) rainfall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The social factors related to landslides: (<b>a</b>) the distance to roads, (<b>b</b>) the distance to urban areas, (<b>c</b>) the land use/cover.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The final landslide susceptibility map created by applying the WLC aggregation method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The final landslide susceptibility map created by using the OWA aggregation method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for: (<b>a</b>) the WLC aggregation, (<b>b</b>) the OWA aggregation methods.</p>
Full article ">
3409 KiB  
Article
Real-Time Monitoring of Water Content in Sandy Soil Using Shear Mode Piezoceramic Transducers and Active Sensing—A Feasibility Study
by Qingzhao Kong, Hongli Chen, Yi-lung Mo and Gangbing Song
Sensors 2017, 17(10), 2395; https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102395 - 20 Oct 2017
Cited by 46 | Viewed by 4471
Abstract
A quantitative understanding of soil water content or soil water status is of great importance to many applications, such as landslide monitoring, rockfill dam health monitoring, precision agriculture, etc. In this paper, a feasibility study was conducted to monitor the soil water content [...] Read more.
A quantitative understanding of soil water content or soil water status is of great importance to many applications, such as landslide monitoring, rockfill dam health monitoring, precision agriculture, etc. In this paper, a feasibility study was conducted to monitor the soil water content in real time using permanent embedded piezoceramic-based transducers called smart aggregates (SAs). An active sensing approach using a customized swept acoustic wave with a frequency range between 100 Hz and 300 kHz was used to study the wave attenuation in the soil in correlation to soil moisture levels. Two sandy soil specimens, each embedded with a pair of SAs, were made in the laboratory, and the water percentage of the soil specimens was incrementally decreased from 15% to 3% during the tests. Due to the change of the soil water status, the damping property of the soil correspondingly changes. The change of the damping property results in the variation of the acoustic wave attenuation ratios. A wavelet packet-based energy index was adopted to compute the energy of the signal captured by the SA sensor. Experimental results show a parabolic growth curve of the received signal energy vs. the water percentage of the soil. The feasibility, sensitivity, and reliability of the proposed method for in-situ monitoring of soil water status were discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Shear mode SA: (<b>a</b>) the structure of a shear mode SA, (<b>b</b>) a photo of a shear mode SA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Preparation of the sandy soil. (<b>a</b>) Dry sand, (<b>b</b>) Sand soil (15% water content).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sandy soil specimen and the location of SAs in the specimen. (<b>a</b>) Sandy soil specimen, (<b>b</b>) Location of the SAs in the sandy soil specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Experimental setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Time-domain signal response of the two test specimens. (<b>a</b>) Specimen 1, (<b>b</b>) Specimen 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Wavelet packet-based energy index. (<b>a</b>) Specimen 1, (<b>b</b>) Specimen 2.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop