Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = hoover dam

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
30 pages, 3887 KiB  
Article
Fish Health Altered by Contaminants and Low Water Temperatures Compounded by Prolonged Regional Drought in the Lower Colorado River Basin, USA
by Steven L. Goodbred, Reynaldo Patiño, David A. Alvarez, Darren Johnson, Deena Hannoun, Kathy R. Echols and Jill A. Jenkins
Toxics 2024, 12(10), 708; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12100708 - 28 Sep 2024
Viewed by 886
Abstract
The goal of this study was to assess health of male Common Carp (carp, Cyprinus carpio) at four sites with a wide range in environmental organic contaminant (EOC) concentrations and water temperatures in Lake Mead National Recreation Area NV/AZ, US, and the [...] Read more.
The goal of this study was to assess health of male Common Carp (carp, Cyprinus carpio) at four sites with a wide range in environmental organic contaminant (EOC) concentrations and water temperatures in Lake Mead National Recreation Area NV/AZ, US, and the potential influence of regional drought. Histological and reproductive biomarkers were measured in 17–30 carp at four sites and 130 EOCs in water per site were analyzed using passive samplers in 2010. Wide ranges among sites were noted in total EOC concentrations (>10Xs) and water temperature/degree days (10Xs). In 2007/08, total polychlorinated biphenyls (tPCBs) in fish whole bodies from Willow Beach (WB) in the free-flowing Colorado River below Hoover Dam were clearly higher than at the other sites. This was most likely due to longer exposures in colder water (12–14 °C) and fish there having the longest lifespan (up to 54 years) for carp reported in the Colorado River Basin. Calculated estrogenicity in water exceeded long-term, environmentally safe criteria of 0.1–0.4 ng/L by one to three orders of magnitude at all sites except the reference site. Low ecological screening values for four contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) in water were exceeded for one CEC in the reference site, two in WB and Las Vegas Bay and three in the most contaminated site LVW. Fish health biomarkers in WB carp had 25% lower liver glycogen, 10Xs higher testicular pigmented cell aggregates and higher sperm abnormalities than the reference site. Sperm from LVW fish also had significantly higher fragmentation of DNA, lower motility and testis had lower percent of spermatozoa, all of which can impair reproduction. Projections from a 3D water quality model performed for WB showed that EOC concentrations due to prolonged regional drought and reduced water levels could increase as high as 135%. Water temperatures by late 21st century are predicted to rise between 0.7 and 2.1 °C that could increase eutrophication, algal blooms, spread disease and decrease dissolved oxygen over 5%. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the four sampling sites in and near the Lake Mead National Recreation Area (LMNRA), NV and AZ, US where Common Carp (<span class="html-italic">Cypinus carpio</span>) were collected, and semipermeable membrane device samplers (SPMD) deployed. The Willow Beach inset shows the five sites in the Colorado River below Hoover Dam where sediment and periphyton were collected and SPMDs were deployed to assess potential polychlorinated biphenyl sources. Lake Mead formed by the Hoover Dam is within the recreation area (green area). Note the drinking water withdrawal location for the City of Las Vegas in Boulder Basin below Las Vegas Wash where there are three sewage treatment plants and an industrial site in Henderson with surface and underground contamination [<a href="#B4-toxics-12-00708" class="html-bibr">4</a>]. The reference site is Overton Arm, at the northern part of LMNRA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Monthly water levels at Hoover Dam for the past 22 years [<a href="#B11-toxics-12-00708" class="html-bibr">11</a>]. A long-term mega-drought in the Colorado River Basin has resulted in the lowest recorded water level in Lake Mead since it was created in 1937. Lower lake water levels provide less volume to dilute environmental organic contaminants discharged from Las Vegas Wash.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Overview and chronology of experimental activities presented in this manuscript focusing on male Common Carp (<span class="html-italic">Cyprinus carpio</span>), chemistry, and climate at LVB (Las Vegas Bay), LVW (Las Vegas Wash), WB (Willow Beach), OA (Overton Arm) in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Nevada/Arizona, United States. EOCs <sup>1</sup> (environmental organic contaminants) detected in the water matrix, only; PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons); OCs (organochlorine pesticides); PCB (polychlorinated biphenyls); PBDE (polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardants); CECs (contaminants of emerging concern). <sup>2</sup> Water quality models predictive of recycled water concentrations incorporating flow conditions, wastewater effluent, water and air temperatures [<a href="#B27-toxics-12-00708" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-toxics-12-00708" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Water temperatures at four sampling sites in Lake Mead National Recreation Area NV and AZ, US where common carp (<span class="html-italic">Cypinus carpio</span>) were sampled over a one-year period to analyze accumulation of environmental organic contaminants. Degree days over that period were calculated by summing all the temperatures above 12 °C, which initiates growth in common carp [<a href="#B53-toxics-12-00708" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. Willow Beach had substantially lower degree days (up to 10 times), indicating slower growth and longer lifespans.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Fish from Overton Arm (OA) and Willow Beach (WB) collected in November 2010, and (<b>B</b>) from Las Vegas Wash (LVW) and Las Vegas Bay (LVB) in July 2010. In the OA-WB plot, OA data appeared evenly distributed among all quadrants, except the upper left, which was occupied mostly by WB data. Principal Component vectors show lower liver glycogen, higher incidence of testicular pigmented cell aggregates and more abnormal sperm compared to OA indicating exposure to environmental organic contaminants (EOCs). (<b>B</b>) In the LVW-LVB plot, LVW data appeared evenly distributed in all quadrants except the upper right, which was exclusively occupied by LVB data. PC vectors show lower progressive sperm motility, higher % haploid sperm and higher DNA fragmentation in LVW compared to LVB indicating exposure to EOCs. Ranked value analysis is represented by “R.” Pigmented cell aggregates is “PgCA”. Gonadosomatic index is “GSI”. Mitochondrial is “Mito”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Photomicrograph of pigmented cell aggregates (asterisks) in the testis of a male common carp collected from Willow Beach. The cell aggregates take on a yellow–brown coloration when stained with hematoxylin and eosin, which was previously shown to represent ceroid–lipofuscin deposition [<a href="#B16-toxics-12-00708" class="html-bibr">16</a>]. When present, pigmented cell aggregates could be found throughout the testes, including near their surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Recycled water concentrations (RWCs), that are the percent of highly treated wastewater effluent from Las Vegas Wash, in October-November. Meters above sea level (masl). (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) are predicted RWCs at the face of Hoover Dam, and (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>) are predicted RWCs leaving Hoover Dam. Note lower RWCs in the cooler hypolimnions (blue) and higher RWCs (orange) in the warmer epilimnion in late November (<b>C</b>). RWCs leaving Hoover Dam at the lower lake level are lower through mid-November then rising sharply to a maximum of 4% (<b>D</b>). Lower lake levels provide less dilution for RWCs resulting in higher RWCs at certain times of the year.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Recycled Water Concentrations (RWC), that are the percent of highly treated wastewater effluent from Las Vegas Wash, in October-November predicted at Willow Beach on the Colorado River below Hoover Dam from a water quality model in 2010 and 2022 and at three different Lake Mead water levels down to deadpool (level where hydro turbines can’t generate electricity). Note the highest RWCs of 4% are predicted in late November at a lower lake level of 304.8 m and the lowest RWCs predicted at a higher lake level of 325.2 m from 2022. This indicates that lower volumes of receiving water in Lake Mead provide less dilution for the wastewater discharged from Las Vegas Wash resulting in higher RWCs.</p>
Full article ">
48 pages, 68484 KiB  
Article
Riparian Area Changes in Greenness and Water Use on the Lower Colorado River in the USA from 2000 to 2020
by Pamela L. Nagler, Armando Barreto-Muñoz, Sattar Chavoshi Borujeni, Hamideh Nouri, Christopher J. Jarchow and Kamel Didan
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(7), 1332; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071332 - 31 Mar 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3641
Abstract
Declines in riparian ecosystem greenness and water use have been observed in the delta of the Lower Colorado River (LCR) since 2000. The purpose of our case study was to measure these metrics on the U.S. side of the border between Hoover and [...] Read more.
Declines in riparian ecosystem greenness and water use have been observed in the delta of the Lower Colorado River (LCR) since 2000. The purpose of our case study was to measure these metrics on the U.S. side of the border between Hoover and Morelos Dams to see if declining greenness was unique to the portion of the river in Mexico. In this case study, five riparian reaches of the LCR from Hoover to Morelos Dam since 2000 were studied to evaluate trends in riparian ecosystem health. We measure these riparian woodlands using remotely sensed measurements of the two-band Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI2; a proxy for greenness); daily evapotranspiration (ET; mmd−1) using EVI2 (ET(EVI2)); and an annualized ET based on EVI2, the Phenology Assessment Metric (PAM ET), an annualized ET using Landsat time-series. A key finding is that riparian health and its water use has been in decline since 2000 on the U.S. portion of the LCR, depicting a loss of green vegetation over the last two decades. EVI2 results show a decline of −13.83%, while average daily ET(EVI2) between the first and last decade had a decrease of over 1 mmd−1 (−27.30%) and the respective average PAM ET losses were 170.91 mmyr−1 (−17.95%). The difference between the first and last five-year periods, 2000–2005 and 2016–2020, showed the largest decrease in daily ET(EVI) of 1.24 mmd−1 (−32.61%). These declines come from a loss in healthy, green, riparian plant-cover, not a change in plant water use efficiency nor efficient use of managed water resources. Our results suggest further deterioration of biodiversity, wildlife habitat and other key ecosystem services on the U.S. portion of the LCR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration (ET) II)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Study area divided into five riparian zones (R3 to R7) outlined in dashed boxes on the Lower Colorado River between Hoover Dam and Morelos Dam on the border of the U.S. and Mexico, with the two dams shown (black circle symbol) and three Arizona Meteorological ground stations (AZMET) used for the weather variables collected over the 21 year study (red stars).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Weather variables from three Arizona Meteorological Network (AZMET) stations (<a href="https://cals.arizona.edu/azmet/" target="_blank">https://cals.arizona.edu/azmet/</a>, accessed on 24 February 2021) located from north to south along the Lower Colorado River (Mohave, Parker, Yuma North Gila) showing 21 years of data plotted for maximum air temperature (<b>a</b>, <b>top</b>), precipitation (<b>b</b>, <b>middle</b>), and ET<sub>o</sub> (<b>c</b>, <b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Time-series data from Landsat 5, 7, and 8 showing the riparian corridor of the Lower Colorado River from Hoover to Morelos dams in five reaches and the average weighted full riparian zone, All, for Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) (<b>a</b>), and EVI2 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The percent change in EVI2 for the peak growing season for each reach and the entire LCR riparian corridor (All) is shown using plots with a horizontal line, box, and whisker ends that indicate the median, 25th and 75th percentiles, and the 10th and 90th percentiles, respectively, and the data points outside this range are shown by dots (<b>a</b>); the rate of change in EVI2 is shown from year-to-year during 2000–2020 and for each reach (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>EVI2 time-series information for All reaches for the full year with months on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis (J-D), for individual years 2000–2010 (<b>a</b>) and 2011–2020 (<b>b</b>), and for each decade. The bold line shows the full 21-year period, 2000–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>EVI2 time-series information for riparian vegetation on the Lower Colorado River for All reaches for the full year with months on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis (J-D) for seven groups of years between 2000 and 2020 to demonstrate spatiotemporal changes across the first decade, 2000–2010 (red solid line) and the second decade, 2011–2020, (red dashed line), as well as the average for the full period, 2000–2020 (black solid line), plus four additional approximately five-year periods, 2000–2005 (blue line), 2006–2010 (green line), 2010–2015 (red dashed line), and 2016–2020 (green dashed line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Daily water use (mmd<sup>−1</sup>) on the Lower Colorado River for 21 years as full-year, time-series data from 2000 to 2020 for the riparian zone five reaches, R3 to R7, shown by colored lines (R3 = light blue, R4 = red, R5 = grey, R6 = yellow, R7 = dark blue), and the average daily ET for All reaches is shown as the black dashed line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The percent change in daily water use for the peak growing season for five reaches and the entire riparian corridor (All) is shown using plots with a horizontal line, box, and whisker ends that indicate the median, 25th and 75th percentiles, and the 10th and 90th percentiles, respectively, and the data points outside this range are shown by dots (<b>a</b>). The rate of change in ET from year-to-year from 2000 to 2020 for each reach (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>ET (mmd<sup>−1</sup>) averaged across four groups of years in ~5-year periods (2000–2005 = green, 2006–2010 = light green, 2011–2015 = peach, 2016–2020 = red) for five reaches and the weighted average of All reaches along the Lower Colorado River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>PAM ET (mmyr<sup>−1</sup>) is shown for each of the years 2000–2020 for five reaches and the weighted average of All reaches along the Lower Colorado River.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The percent change in PAM ET (mmyr<sup>−1</sup>) between reaches and from year-to-year on the LCR. The horizontal line, box, and whisker ends indicate the median, 25th and 75th percentiles, and 10th and 90th percentiles, respectively, and data points outside this range are shown by dots (<b>a</b>); rate of change in PAM ET is shown with lines for each reach annually during 2000–2019 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>The percent change in PAM ET (mmyr<sup>−1</sup>) between reaches and from year-to-year on the LCR. The horizontal line, box, and whisker ends indicate the median, 25th and 75th percentiles, and 10th and 90th percentiles, respectively, and data points outside this range are shown by dots (<b>a</b>); rate of change in PAM ET is shown with lines for each reach annually during 2000–2019 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Maps of five reaches along the Lower Colorado River showing change in greenness using scaled NDVI (NDVI*) (12a, left) and ET (12b, right) for the compared periods of the first (2000 to 2010) and last decade (2011 to 2020). The histogram (upper right) shows the frequency of pixels. Values less than zero indicate a loss of vegetation greenness and water use. Also, each map figure contains five enlarged inset areas, boxes from north to south showing riparian vegetation in R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7. The legend shows decreases (brown) and increases (green) depicting how these two metrics, NDVI* and ET, have changed over the respective time periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Maps of five reaches along the Lower Colorado River showing change in greenness using scaled NDVI (NDVI*) (13a, left) and ET (13b, right) for the compared periods of the first (2000 to 2005) and last decade (2016 to 2020). The histogram (upper right) shows the frequency of pixels. Values less than zero indicate a loss of vegetation greenness and water use. Furthermore, each map figure contains five enlarged inset areas, boxes from north to south showing riparian vegetation in R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7. The legend shows decreases (brown) and increases (green) depicting how these two metrics, NDVI* and ET, have changed over the respective time periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>). EVI2 time-series information for the full 21-year period, 2000–2020, for the five reaches, R3 to R7 (<a href="#remotesensing-13-01332-f0A1" class="html-fig">Figure A1</a>a–e), for the full year with months on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis (J-D), and for individual years 2000–2010 (<b>top</b>) and 2011–2020 (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>). EVI2 time-series information for the full 21-year period, 2000–2020, for the five reaches, R3 to R7 (<a href="#remotesensing-13-01332-f0A1" class="html-fig">Figure A1</a>a–e), for the full year with months on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis (J-D), and for individual years 2000–2010 (<b>top</b>) and 2011–2020 (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>). EVI2 time-series information for the full 21-year period, 2000–2020, for the five reaches, R3 to R7 (<a href="#remotesensing-13-01332-f0A1" class="html-fig">Figure A1</a>a–e), for the full year with months on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis (J-D), and for individual years 2000–2010 (<b>top</b>) and 2011–2020 (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>). EVI2 time-series information for the five reaches, R3–R7 (<a href="#remotesensing-13-01332-f0A2" class="html-fig">Figure A2</a>a–e) for the full year with months on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis (J–D), for years 2011 to 2020 individually and averaged by two decades, 2000–2010 and 2011–2020, and the full 21-year period, 2000–2020 as well as the two recent five-year periods, 2010–2015 and 2016–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>). EVI2 time-series information for the five reaches, R3–R7 (<a href="#remotesensing-13-01332-f0A2" class="html-fig">Figure A2</a>a–e) for the full year with months on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis (J–D), for years 2011 to 2020 individually and averaged by two decades, 2000–2010 and 2011–2020, and the full 21-year period, 2000–2020 as well as the two recent five-year periods, 2010–2015 and 2016–2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>). Bars of PAM ET (mmyr<sup>−1</sup>) based on EVI2 time-series information for the Lower Colorado River riparian reaches R3 to R7 shown in <a href="#remotesensing-13-01332-f0A3" class="html-fig">Figure A3</a>a–e for each of 21 years between 2000 and 2020 on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>). Bars of PAM ET (mmyr<sup>−1</sup>) based on EVI2 time-series information for the Lower Colorado River riparian reaches R3 to R7 shown in <a href="#remotesensing-13-01332-f0A3" class="html-fig">Figure A3</a>a–e for each of 21 years between 2000 and 2020 on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>). Bars of PAM ET (mmyr<sup>−1</sup>) based on EVI2 time-series information for the Lower Colorado River riparian reaches R3 to R7 shown in <a href="#remotesensing-13-01332-f0A3" class="html-fig">Figure A3</a>a–e for each of 21 years between 2000 and 2020 on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Flow chart of methodology.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5398 KiB  
Article
Multi-Sensor InSAR Assessment of Ground Deformations around Lake Mead and Its Relation to Water Level Changes
by Mehdi Darvishi, Georgia Destouni, Saeid Aminjafari and Fernando Jaramillo
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(3), 406; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030406 - 25 Jan 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3817
Abstract
Changes in subsurface water resources might alter the surrounding ground by generating subsidence or uplift, depending on geological and hydrogeological site characteristics. Improved understanding of the relationships between surface water storage and ground deformation is important for design and maintenance of hydraulic facilities [...] Read more.
Changes in subsurface water resources might alter the surrounding ground by generating subsidence or uplift, depending on geological and hydrogeological site characteristics. Improved understanding of the relationships between surface water storage and ground deformation is important for design and maintenance of hydraulic facilities and ground stability. Here, we construct one of the longest series of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) to date, over twenty-five years, to study the relationships between water level changes and ground surface deformation in the surroundings of Lake Mead, United States, and at the site of the Hoover Dam. We use the Small Baseline Subset (SBAS) and Permanent scatterer interferometry (PSI) techniques over 177 SAR data, encompassing different SAR sensors including ERS1/2, Envisat, ALOS (PALSAR), and Sentinel-1(S1). We perform a cross-sensor examination of the relationship between water level changes and ground displacement. We found a negative relationship between water level change and ground deformation around the reservoir that was consistent across all sensors. The negative relationship was evident from the long-term changes in water level and deformation occurring from 1995 to 2014, and also from the intra-annual oscillations of the later period, 2014 to 2019, both around the reservoir and at the dam. These results suggest an elastic response of the ground surface to changes in water storage in the reservoir, both at the dam site and around the reservoir. Our study illustrates how InSAR-derived ground deformations can be consistent in time across sensors, showing the potential of detecting longer time-series of ground deformation. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Location of Lake Mead (<b>a</b>) in the United States, (<b>b</b>) satellite view of Lake Mead and location of the GPS station P006 (red triangle), (<b>c</b>) zoomed view of the Hoover Dam (photo source: [<a href="#B54-remotesensing-13-00406" class="html-bibr">54</a>]), (<b>d</b>) Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the area of interest with 30−m spatial resolution, and (<b>e</b>) extent of the four different SAR scenes used in this study over the Lake Mead area (i.e., ERS1/2−red, Envisat−green, ALOS-blue, and S1−purple), shown over a Google Earth image. The standard full extent of the Envisat, ERS, and ALOS data, and the extent of three selected bursts of S1 (ascending and descending) are displayed in the figure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Water level and storage volume in Lake Mead. (<b>a</b>) Mean water level in Lake Mead and storage volume (United States Bureau of Reclamation) along with the periods of availability of the four types of SAR data. (<b>b</b>) The scatter plot shows the linear correlation between the water level and water storage, along with the correlation coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sensor−specific velocity maps of ground deformation of Lake Mead. Boundary of Lake Mead during the ERS period (black) and maps for the (<b>a</b>) ERS, (<b>b</b>) Envisat, (<b>c</b>) ALOS, (<b>d</b>) S1D (Descending), and (<b>e</b>) S1A (Ascending), showing the Satellite Pass (SP) and Line of Sight (LOS). Negative values indicate an increase in the distance along the LOS (subsidence) and positive values present a decrease in the distance along the LOS (uplift). The S1A map was clipped based on the S1D extent for better inter-comparison. The pixel corresponding to the GPSP006 station in <a href="#remotesensing-13-00406-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> was used as the reference point.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Velocity maps of ground displacement in the buffer zone. LOS velocity maps for (<b>a</b>) ERS, (<b>b</b>) Envisat, (<b>c</b>) ALOS, (<b>d</b>) S1D, and (<b>e</b>) S1A, each with three small panels on the right showing the ground deformation velocity in mm per year along each transect (i.e., A’−A’’, B’−B’’, and C’−C’’).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Water level and InSAR−calculated displacement relative to the initial ground level of each sensor-period. Water level (m.a.s.l, dark blue) and InSAR LOS average displacement of a 3 × 3 pixel−area at 500 m from the shore and along the transects (<b>a</b>) A, (<b>b</b>) B, and (<b>c</b>) C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Validation with GPS station during the S1 period. Cross−comparison between vertical ground displacements at station P006 from both GPS measurements and SBAS during the S1 period for both (<b>a</b>) descending and (<b>b</b>) ascending modes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>LOS displacements in Hoover Dam derived by the SBAS and PSI. (<b>a</b>) SBAS displacement along the LOS in ascending (SBAS−A), (<b>b</b>) and descending (SBAS−D) mode, (<b>c</b>) PSI displacement in ascending (PSI−A) and (<b>d</b>) descending (PSI−D) modes. Point “b” indicates the middle of the crest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Displacements in the middle of the crest. Water level and PSI/SBAS ground displacement along the LOS at the middle of the crest (point b in <a href="#remotesensing-13-00406-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>a). (<b>a</b>) The ascending mode and (<b>b</b>) the descending modes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Horizontal and vertical displacements of the Hoover Dam during the S1 period. Regional (<b>a</b>) horizontal and (<b>b</b>) vertical displacement maps, with focus on the dam site—(<b>c</b>) horizontal and (<b>d</b>) vertical displacements, respectively. (<b>e</b>) Total horizontal and vertical displacements along the crest (from point K’ to K’’) and (<b>f</b>) time-series of water level and the vertical displacements of the buttresses and the points ‘a’, ‘b’, and ‘c’, along and over the crest (<a href="#remotesensing-13-00406-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>d).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Horizontal and vertical displacements of the Hoover Dam during the S1 period. Regional (<b>a</b>) horizontal and (<b>b</b>) vertical displacement maps, with focus on the dam site—(<b>c</b>) horizontal and (<b>d</b>) vertical displacements, respectively. (<b>e</b>) Total horizontal and vertical displacements along the crest (from point K’ to K’’) and (<b>f</b>) time-series of water level and the vertical displacements of the buttresses and the points ‘a’, ‘b’, and ‘c’, along and over the crest (<a href="#remotesensing-13-00406-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>d).</p>
Full article ">
3939 KiB  
Article
Temperature and Heat-Related Mortality Trends in the Sonoran and Mojave Desert Region
by Polioptro F. Martinez-Austria and Erick R. Bandala
Atmosphere 2017, 8(3), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8030053 - 3 Mar 2017
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 8974
Abstract
Extreme temperatures and heat wave trends in five cities within the Sonoran Desert region (e.g., Tucson and Phoenix, Arizona, in the United States and Ciudad Obregon and San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora; and Mexicali, Baja California, in Mexico) and one city within the [...] Read more.
Extreme temperatures and heat wave trends in five cities within the Sonoran Desert region (e.g., Tucson and Phoenix, Arizona, in the United States and Ciudad Obregon and San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora; and Mexicali, Baja California, in Mexico) and one city within the Mojave Desert region (e.g., Las Vegas, Nevada) were assessed using field data collected from 1950 to 2014. Instead of being selected by watershed, the cities were selected because they are part of the same arid climatic region. The data were analyzed for maximum temperature increases and the trends were confirmed statistically using Spearman’s nonparametric test. Temperature trends were correlated with the mortality information related with extreme heat events in the region. The results showed a clear trend of increasing maximum temperatures during the months of June, July, and August for five of the six cities and statically confirmed using Spearman’s rho values. Las Vegas was the only city where the temperature increase was not confirmed using Spearman’s test, probably because it is geographically located outside of the Sonoran Desert or because of its proximity to the Hoover Dam. The relationship between mortality and temperature was analyzed for the cities of Mexicali, Mexico and Phoenix. Arizona. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Temperature Extremes and Heat/Cold Waves)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Koppen-Geiger climatic map of North America. (Image by Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., and McMahon, T. A. (University of Melbourne) (CC BY-SA 3.0 (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0))" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0))</a>, via Wikimedia Commons).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Maximum monthly temperature variations and linear trend lines for August.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Maximum monthly temperature variations and linear trend lines for September.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Number of days that exceeded the 90th percentile of average maximum temperatures threshold in August.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Maximum temperature and mortality rate (per 10,000 inhabitants) during August in Maricopa County (2004 to 2015).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relationship between mortality rate and max temperatures during August in Maricopa County (2004 to 2015).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mortality rate per 10,000 inhabitants and maximum monthly temperature in Mexicali during August (1990 to 2010).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Mortality rate (per 10,000 inhabitants) versus maximum temperature during August in Mexicali (1990 to 2010).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mortality rate by 10,000 inhabitants for July (<b>a</b>), August (<b>b</b>), and September (<b>c</b>), 1990–2010 in Mexicali, Mexico.</p>
Full article ">
760 KiB  
Article
Visualization of Lake Mead Surface Area Changes from 1972 to 2009
by K. Wayne Forsythe, Barbara Schatz, Stephen J. Swales, Lisa-Jen Ferrato and David M. Atkinson
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2012, 1(2), 108-119; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi1020108 - 26 Jun 2012
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 17498
Abstract
For most of the last decade, the south-western portion of the United States has experienced a severe and enduring drought. This has caused serious concerns about water supply and management in the region. In this research, 30 orthorectified Landsat satellite images from the [...] Read more.
For most of the last decade, the south-western portion of the United States has experienced a severe and enduring drought. This has caused serious concerns about water supply and management in the region. In this research, 30 orthorectified Landsat satellite images from the United States Geological Service (USGS) Earth Explorer archive were analyzed for the 1972 to 2009 period. The images encompassed Lake Mead (a major reservoir in this region) and were examined for changes in water surface area. Decadal lake area minimums/maximums were achieved in 1972/1979, 1981/1988, 1991/1998, and 2009/2000. The minimum lake area extent occurred in 2009 (356.4 km2), while the maximum occurred in 1998 (590.6 km2). Variable trends in water level and lake area were observed throughout the analysis period, however progressively lower values were observed since 2000. The Landsat derived lake areas show a very strong relationship with actual measured water levels at the Hoover Dam. Yearly water level variations at the dam vary minimally from the satellite derived estimates. A complete (yearly) record of satellite images may have helped to reduce the slight deviations in the time series. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Lake Mead (1998 extent) within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area (NRA)-blue boundary. Sources: Landsat image [<a href="#B19-ijgi-01-00108" class="html-bibr">19</a>], Vectors [<a href="#B20-ijgi-01-00108" class="html-bibr">20</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The Lake Mead “Bathtub Ring” as seen from the Hoover Dam in March 2009.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Lake Area and Water Levels (at the Hoover Dam) for the 1972–2009 Period. Source: Water Levels [<a href="#B22-ijgi-01-00108" class="html-bibr">22</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Minimum (grey)/ maximum (black) lake area extents for the 1972/1979 period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Minimum (gray)/maximum (black) lake area extents for the 1981/1988 period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Minimum (grey)/maximum (black) lake area extents for the 1991/1998 period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Minimum (grey)/maximum (black) lake area extents for the 2009/2000 period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Absolute minimum (grey–2009)/maximum (black–1998) lake area extents for the analysis period.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop