Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (437)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = karst ecosystem

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 3642 KiB  
Article
Nitrogen-Fixing Plants Enhance Soil Phosphorus Availability by Promoting Transformations Among Phosphorus Fractions in a Subtropical Karst Forest
by Yu Zhu, Zhizhuo Gao, Lijun Liu, Jie Li, Tongbin Zhu, Jiangming Ma, Thomas H. DeLuca and Min Duan
Forests 2025, 16(2), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020360 - 17 Feb 2025
Viewed by 163
Abstract
Nitrogen (N)-fixing plants are commonly employed in the restoration of degraded terrestrial ecosystems due to their ability to increase soil N capital and boost ecosystem productivity. Given the close coupling between N and phosphorus (P) in soil, the effects of N-fixing plants on [...] Read more.
Nitrogen (N)-fixing plants are commonly employed in the restoration of degraded terrestrial ecosystems due to their ability to increase soil N capital and boost ecosystem productivity. Given the close coupling between N and phosphorus (P) in soil, the effects of N-fixing plants on soil P fractions and availability in karst forests remain largely unexplored. Herein, we compared soil P pools, fractions, and availability in the rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of N-fixing and non-N-fixing plants, and explored associated drivers, such as soil, microbial, and plant properties, in a subtropical karst forest. The results showed that the N-fixing plants increased total P, inorganic P, and available P in both the rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils. The nitrogen-fixing plants increased soil labile P (LP) and non-labile P (NLP), but decreased moderately labile P (MLP), particularly in the rhizosphere soils, due to transformations among different soil P fractions. Soil P fractions were primarily influenced by soil inorganic P, root and leaf N, and microbial biomass N in the N-fixing plant treatment, whereas soil inorganic P, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and dissolved organic N (DON) were the key factors in the non-N-fixing plant treatment. Consequently, soil properties, microbial attributes, plant nutrients, and soil P fractions collectively exerted both direct and indirect effects to increase soil P availability in the N-fixing plant treatment. In contrast, soil P fractions directly and soil properties indirectly influenced soil P availability in the non-N-fixing plant treatment. Our results revealed the unique role of N-fixing plants in driving soil P availability in subtropical karst forests. These findings are essential for developing effective strategies for P nutrient management and guiding the selection of appropriate plant species for vegetation restoration in karst regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Variation & Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in Forests)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Soil total P (<b>a</b>), organic P (<b>b</b>), inorganic P (<b>c</b>), and available P (<b>d</b>) contents in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of N-fixing plants (n = 8) and non-N-fixing plants (n = 5) in a subtropical karst forest in China. Different lowercase and uppercase letters indicate significant differences between rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils for N-fixing and non-N-fixing plants, respectively (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and * indicates significant differences between N-fixing and non-N-fixing plants for rhizosphere soil or non-rhizosphere soil at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Soil P fractions in rhizosphere (<b>a</b>) and non-rhizosphere (<b>b</b>) soils of N-fixing plants (n = 8) and non-N-fixing plants (n = 5) in a subtropical karst forest in China. Asterisks indicate significant differences between N-fixing and non-N-fixing plants for each soil P fraction. *, **, and *** indicate significance levels at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Soil labile P (<b>a</b>), moderately labile P (<b>b</b>), and non-labile P (<b>c</b>) contents in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of N-fixing plants (n = 8) and non-N-fixing plants (n = 5) in a subtropical karst forest in China. Different lowercase and uppercase letters indicate significant differences between rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils for N-fixing and non-N-fixing plants, respectively (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and * indicates significant differences between N-fixing and non-N-fixing plants for rhizosphere soil or non-rhizosphere soil at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Soil microbial biomass carbon (<b>a</b>), microbial biomass nitrogen (<b>b</b>), and microbial biomass phosphorus (<b>c</b>) contents and alkaline phosphatase (<b>d</b>) activity in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of N-fixing plants (n = 8) and non-N-fixing plants (n = 5) in a subtropical karst forest in China. Different lowercase and uppercase letters indicate significant differences between rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils for N-fixing and non-N-fixing plants, respectively (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and * indicates significant differences between N-fixing and non-N-fixing plants for rhizosphere soil or non-rhizosphere soil at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Carbon (<b>a</b>), nitrogen (<b>b</b>), and phosphorus (c) contents in the leaves and roots of N-fixing plants (n = 8) and non-N-fixing plants (n = 5) in a subtropical karst forest in China. * indicates significant differences between N-fixing and non-N-fixing plants for each nutrient at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Variation partitioning analysis (VPA) illustrating the unique contributions of soil properties, microbial properties, and plant nutrients to soil P fractions in N-fixing plants (<b>a</b>) and non-N-fixing plants (<b>b</b>) in a subtropical karst forest in China, and redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil P fractions in N-fixing plants (<b>c</b>) and non-N-fixing plants (<b>d</b>). The percentages shown in the VPA represent the proportion of variance in soil P fractions explained by each factor (or combination of factors), with the remaining variance attributed to the residual (unexplained) component. The red and blue lines in the RDA represent explanatory and response variables, respectively. LP, labile P; MLP, moderately labile P; NLP, non-labile P; IP, inorganic P; DOC, dissolved organic carbon; DN, dissolved nitrogen; MBN, microbial biomass nitrogen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Structural equation models (SEMs) revealing the multivariate effects of soil properties, microbial properties, plant nutrients, and soil P fractions on soil available P in N-fixing plants (<b>a</b>) and non-N-fixing plants (<b>b</b>) in a subtropical karst forest in China. Standardized total effects of variables from the SEMs are depicted for N-fixing plants (<b>c</b>) and non-N-fixing plants (<b>d</b>). The solid red and blue arrows indicate positive and negative pathways, respectively, while the dashed grey arrows represent pathways with no significant effect. The numbers next to the arrows are the standardized path coefficients. Asterisks (*, **, ***) denote significance levels at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, respectively. The R<sup>2</sup> values displayed below the response variables show the proportion of variation explained by the relationships with other variables.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 8523 KiB  
Article
Ecological Health Assessment of Karst Plateau Wetlands Based on Landscape Pattern Analysis
by Linjiang Yin, Weiquan Zhao, Yanmei Liao, Wei Li, Zulun Zhao and Liang Huang
Water 2025, 17(4), 537; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17040537 - 13 Feb 2025
Viewed by 310
Abstract
This study analyzed the changes in landscape patterns and the ecological health status of karst plateau wetlands, providing valuable insights into their conservation. Using land cover data from 1996 to 2021, DEM, and Landsat series satellite imagery, this study employed landscape ecology methods [...] Read more.
This study analyzed the changes in landscape patterns and the ecological health status of karst plateau wetlands, providing valuable insights into their conservation. Using land cover data from 1996 to 2021, DEM, and Landsat series satellite imagery, this study employed landscape ecology methods and the pressure–state–response (PSR) model framework. A regional landscape grid was constructed, and 13 indicators were selected to establish an ecological health evaluation system for karst plateau wetlands. This allowed us to explore the spatiotemporal change characteristics of the landscape pattern and the ecological health of karst plateau wetlands. The results showed that over a 25-year period, farmland, grassland, and construction land areas have increased, whereas forested land areas have decreased. Water bodies remained relatively stable but showed a trend of transitioning into grassland. Unused land showed no significant change. Landscape analysis indicated that grasslands experience the highest rate of fragmentation, complex shapes, and greater heterogeneity, whereas water bodies have the lowest fragmentation, more regular shapes, and lower heterogeneity. Other landscape types exhibited moderate characteristics. Overall, the landscape of the study area exhibited high fragmentation, specific patch aggregation, moderate patch density, and low diversity. A comprehensive ecological health evaluation revealed that the wetland health value remained at an “unhealthy” level from 1996 to 2021. Although there was a brief improvement in 2010, effective long-term recovery was not achieved. Spatially, the proportion of “diseased” areas peaked in 2006, and most grid zones remained in an “unhealthy” state over the years, with none reaching the “healthy” standard. These findings highlight the severe challenges faced by the wetland ecosystem. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Temporal Sankey diagram of landscape-type transitions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dominance indices of landscape patterns at the type level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fragmentation index of landscape patterns at the type level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of landscape health diagnosis in various grid areas of wetlands.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 5095 KiB  
Article
Stoichiometric Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Different Components of Karst Forest Plants at the Microtopography and Microhabitat Scale in Maolan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China
by Peng Wu, Hua Zhou, Wenjun Zhao, Guangneng Yang, Yingchun Cui, Yiju Hou, Chengjiang Tan, Ting Zhou and Fangjun Ding
Forests 2025, 16(2), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020317 - 11 Feb 2025
Viewed by 376
Abstract
The main dominant tree species of karst forest at the microtopography and the microhabitat scale were taken as the research object in this study, and the stoichiometric characteristics of different components and their influencing factors were analyzed in order to reveal the survival [...] Read more.
The main dominant tree species of karst forest at the microtopography and the microhabitat scale were taken as the research object in this study, and the stoichiometric characteristics of different components and their influencing factors were analyzed in order to reveal the survival strategy of karst forest plants in harsh habitats and their mechanism of adaptation to complex terrain. The results showed that the nutrient distribution among different components of the plant was closely related to its organizational structure and functional attributes. The microtopography had a significant effect on plant nutrient accumulation. However, the effect of the microhabitat on plant stoichiometric characteristics was relatively small. Different ecological factors had various regulatory effects on the stoichiometric characteristics of plant components, among which the specific leaf area (SLA) was the most critical biological factor affecting the stoichiometric characteristics of new leaves. Leaf dry matter content (LDMC) had the greatest effect on mature leaves, litter, and branches, and the trunks were mainly affected by plant species. There are synergistic tradeoffs between different plant components, and the interaction between each element mainly shows antagonistic and synergistic effects. Plants adapt to the changes in the karst microtopography and microhabitat by adjusting resource allocation and structural and functional traits. In the upslope, shady slope, and semi-shady slope regions and slopes above 25°, the plants adopted a conservative strategy. In depressions, on sunny slopes, and on flat land, as well as on slopes below 25°, the resource acquisition strategy was adopted. This is the result of the interaction of biological and abiotic factors, which reflects the resource acquisition and nutrient allocation strategies of plants in different habitats, and it is also an mechanism of adaptation to a complex and changeable environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiological Mechanisms of Plant Responses to Environmental Stress)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagram of plant sample locations. Numbers 1–51 represent each plant sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The contents of C (<b>a</b>), N (<b>b</b>), P (<b>c</b>), K (<b>d</b>), Ca (<b>e</b>), and Mg (<b>f</b>) of various components of karst forest plants in different microhabitats. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between different microhabitats among the same plant component (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among different components of plants in the same microhabitat (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The absence of any uppercase or lowercase letters indicates that there is no significant difference between different plant components or different microhabitats (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The contents of C (<b>a</b>), N (<b>b</b>), P (<b>c</b>), K (<b>d</b>), Ca (<b>e</b>), and Mg (<b>f</b>) of various components of karst forest plants at different slope positions. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between different slope positions of the same plant component (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Different capital letters indicate a significant difference among different components at the same slope position (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The absence of any uppercase or lowercase letters indicates that there is no significant difference between different plant components or different slope positions (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The contents of C (<b>a</b>), N (<b>b</b>), P (<b>c</b>), K (<b>d</b>), Ca (<b>e</b>), and Mg (<b>f</b>) of various components of karst forest plants on different slope aspects. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between different slope aspects of the same plant component (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Different capital letters indicate a significant difference among different components of the same slope aspect (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The absence of any uppercase or lowercase letters indicates that there is no significant difference between different plant components or different slope aspects (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The contents of C (<b>a</b>), N (<b>b</b>), P (<b>c</b>), K (<b>d</b>), Ca (<b>e</b>), and Mg (<b>f</b>) of various components of karst forest plants on different slope degrees. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between different slope degrees of the same plant component (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among different components of the same slope degree (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The absence of any uppercase or lowercase letters indicates that there is no significant difference between different plant components or different slope degrees (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The C/N (<b>a</b>), C/P (<b>b</b>), C/K (<b>c</b>), N/P (<b>d</b>), N/K (<b>e</b>), K/P (<b>f</b>), and Ca/Mg (<b>g</b>) of various components of karst forest plants in different microhabitats. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference among different microhabitats of the same plant component (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among different components of plants in the same microhabitat (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The absence of any uppercase or lowercase letters indicates that there is no significant difference between different plant components or different microhabitats (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The C/N (<b>a</b>), C/P (<b>b</b>), C/K (<b>c</b>), N/P (<b>d</b>), N/K (<b>e</b>), K/P (<b>f</b>), and Ca/Mg (<b>g</b>) of various components of karst forest plants at different slope positions. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between different slope positions of the same plant component (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Different capital letters indicate a significant difference among different components at the same slope position (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The absence of any uppercase or lowercase letters indicates that there is no significant difference between different plant components or different slope positions (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The C/N (<b>a</b>), C/P (<b>b</b>), C/K (<b>c</b>), N/P (<b>d</b>), N/K (<b>e</b>), K/P (<b>f</b>), and Ca/Mg (<b>g</b>) of various components of karst forest plants on different slope aspects. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between different slope aspects of the same plant component (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Different capital letters indicate a significant difference among different components of the same slope aspect (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The absence of any uppercase or lowercase letters indicates that there is no significant difference between different plant components or different slope aspects (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The C/N (<b>a</b>), C/P (<b>b</b>), C/K (<b>c</b>), N/P (<b>d</b>), N/K (<b>e</b>), K/P (<b>f</b>), and Ca/Mg (<b>g</b>) of various components of karst forest plants on different slope degrees. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between different slope degrees of the same plant component (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among different components of the same slope degree (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The absence of any uppercase or lowercase letters indicated that there is no significant difference between different plant components or different slope degrees (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>RDA ordination diagram of stoichiometric characteristics of different components of plants and ecological factors. The numbers 1–5 represent the topographic factors altitude, slope, aspect, slope position, and microhabitat, respectively. The numbers 6–17 represent the total soil N, hydrolytic N, total P, available P, total K, available K, total Ca, exchangeable Ca, total Mg, exchangeable Mg, organic carbon, and pH, respectively. The numbers 18–31 represent the plant species, life form, DBH, tree height, <span class="html-italic">P<sub>n</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">T<sub>r</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">G<sub>s</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">C<sub>i</sub></span>, <span class="html-italic">SLA</span>, <span class="html-italic">LDMC</span>, <span class="html-italic">LWC</span>, <span class="html-italic">LTD</span>, and N and P reabsorption rate, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Variance decomposition results of stoichiometric characteristics of different plant components under the influence of ecological factors.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 3674 KiB  
Article
Inconsistent Variations in Components of Functional Stability Under Heterogeneous Conditions: A Case Study from the Maolan Karst Forest Ecosystems in Guizhou Province, Southwest of China
by Yong Li, Longchenxi Meng, Luyao Chen, Mingzhen Sui, Guangqi Zhang, Qingfu Liu, Danmei Chen, Fangjun Ding and Lipeng Zang
Forests 2025, 16(2), 304; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020304 - 9 Feb 2025
Viewed by 618
Abstract
Human-induced environmental changes threaten the functional stability of natural forest ecosystems. Understanding the dominant factors influencing both functional space and stability in extremely heterogeneous environments is crucial for elucidating the stability of heterogeneous forest ecosystems. Here, 30 forest dynamic plots were established along [...] Read more.
Human-induced environmental changes threaten the functional stability of natural forest ecosystems. Understanding the dominant factors influencing both functional space and stability in extremely heterogeneous environments is crucial for elucidating the stability of heterogeneous forest ecosystems. Here, 30 forest dynamic plots were established along the successional pathway in Maolan National Nature Reserve in Southwest China. By measuring 15,725 stems across 286 distinct species’ six key plant functional traits, we constructed the key plant functional traits for functional space and quantified functional redundancy (FR) and functional vulnerability (FV) to represent functional stability, and we further utilized the line model and multiple linear regression model to explore the key biotic/abiotic indicators influencing functional stability along the successional pathway of degraded karst forests. Additionally, as the successional pathway unfolded, the contribution of the six plant traits to the overall functional space increased, from 59.85% to 66.64%. These traits included specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf thickness (LT) and leaf nitrogen content (LNC), which played a crucial role in driving functional space. With the increasing species richness (FR), functional entities (p < 0.001) and FR (p < 0.001) increased, while FV (p < 0.01) decreased. The results also demonstrated a higher FR in degraded karst forests (FR > 2). However, over 51% of FEs consisted of a single species, with the majority of species clustered into a few functional entities (FEs), indicating an elevated level of FV in karst forests. Soil nutrient availability significantly influences the ecosystem’s functional stability, explaining 87% of FR variability and 100% of FV variability. Finally, the rich SR of karst forests could provide sufficient insurance effects; soil pH and available potassium (AK) enhance resilience, and exchangeable calcium (Eca), total phosphorus (TP) and total potassium (TK) indicate the resistance of functional stability in degraded karst forests. This study highlights the complex mechanisms of functional stability in extreme habitat conditions, thereby deepening our understanding of ecosystem function maintenance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographic locations of the FDPs established.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The PCA of functional traits within the functional space in the early successional stage (<b>A</b>), later successional stage (<b>B</b>) and climax community (<b>C</b>). Contour lines are used to outline the color gradient, which represents the kernel density of species distribution (from dense, indicated by red, to sparse, indicated by light yellow), corresponding to the 25%, 50% and 95% quantiles of species abundance. The differently colored dots represent the distribution of species in each successional stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variations in functional stability among successional stages in degraded karst forests. The bottom right of the distribution diagram indicates the number of functional entities (Nb F.E.) present in each successional community. Functional richness (FR, denoted as ‘Red.’) is represented by the horizontal dashed line, which corresponds to the mean number of species per functional entity, with the specific value annotated on the right margin of the panel. Functional vulnerability (FV) is indicated by the horizontal color line accompanied by arrows. Functional over-redundancy (FOR), which represents the percentage of species that exceed the expected number based on FR in over-represented functional entities, is depicted through color coding. Dark yellow represents the climax community stage (<b>A</b>); light brown represents the later successional stage (<b>B</b>); blue represents the early successional stage (<b>C</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationship between α-diversity (species richness (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>), rarefied species richness (<b>E</b>–<b>H</b>), Pielou’s evenness (<b>I</b>–<b>L</b>)) and four functional indices for the successional stages. The black line delineates the fitted linear function relating α-diversity and the functional indices. Solid lines represent significant effects, while dashed lines denote nonsignificant effects. Dark yellow represents the climax community stage; light brown represents the later successional stage; blue represents the early successional stage. *, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; ***, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Figure (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) illustrate the relative effects of various predictors on FEs, FR, FOR and FV, respectively. The model’s averaged parameter estimates, standardized as regression coefficients, are displayed alongside their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The relative importance of each predictor is quantified by the proportion of explained variance it accounts for. The relative impact of the predictors and their interactions is calculated by dividing the parameter estimate of each predictor by the sum of all parameter estimates, with the result expressed as a percentage. Abiotic factors include topography and soil. Pfc is the profile curvature; Ele represents the elevation; Eca denotes the exchangeable calcium; POC represents the particulate organic carbon; LFOC represents the light-fraction organic carbon; pH indicates the pH value; TP denotes the total phosphorus; TK represents the total potassium; SOC represents the soil organic carbon; AK represents the available potassium; S-SC denotes the soil saccharase. *, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; ***, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1521 KiB  
Article
Carbon and Nitrogen Content and CO2 Efflux from Coarse Woody Debris of Norway Spruce, Black Alder, and Silver Birch
by Dovilė Čiuldienė, Egidijus Vigricas, Greta Galdikaitė, Vidas Stakėnas, Kęstutis Armolaitis and Iveta Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė
Forests 2025, 16(2), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020293 - 8 Feb 2025
Viewed by 335
Abstract
Coarse woody debris (CWD) is an essential component in forest ecosystems, playing a significant role in enhancing biodiversity, soil formation, and nutrient cycling through decomposition processes. CWD also contributes to greenhouse gas fluxes, particularly through CO2 emissions. This study investigated the physical [...] Read more.
Coarse woody debris (CWD) is an essential component in forest ecosystems, playing a significant role in enhancing biodiversity, soil formation, and nutrient cycling through decomposition processes. CWD also contributes to greenhouse gas fluxes, particularly through CO2 emissions. This study investigated the physical and chemical properties of CWD and the CO2 effluxes from CWD of different decay classes. For this study, a range of CWD—from recently dead to highly decomposed wood—of native tree species such as silver birch (Betula pendula Roth), black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.), and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) in hemiboreal forests were investigated. The findings showed that CWD properties significantly differed among tree species and CWD decay classes. Significant variations in wood density and total nitrogen (N) were observed in the early stages of CWD decay, with the highest values found for the deciduous tree species. The concentration of organic carbon (C) increased throughout the decomposition. The lowest CO2 efflux from CWD was found for spruce CWD from all decay classes and it was the highest for black alder and silver birch, especially for the 3rd and 4th decay classes. CO2 efflux was mainly influenced by the degree of decomposition, which was represented by the CWD decay class, followed by wood density and C content. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental site with collars installed in forest soil for CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from coarse woody debris (CWD) (Photo: E.Vigricas).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Physical and chemical properties of coarse woody debris (CWD) of black alder, silver birch, and Norway spruce in different decay classes: wood density (<b>A</b>); wood moisture for each species (<b>B</b>); concentration of organic carbon (OC) (<b>C</b>); concentration of total nitrogen (TN) for each species (<b>D</b>); and C/N ratio (<b>E</b>). The results are expressed as the mean ± 95% CI. Different lowercase letters indicate significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) means among the species, based on Tukey’s test. The equation and coefficient of determination (<span class="html-italic">R</span><sup>2</sup>) indicate the relationship between decay classes and the physical and chemical parameters of the CWD samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The mean CO<sub>2</sub> efflux released from coarse woody debris (CWD) of black alder, silver birch, and Norway spruce across different decay classes. The results are expressed as the mean ± 95% CI, and the different lowercase letters indicate significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) means based on Tukey’s test.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 3900 KiB  
Article
Responses of Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Nutrient Limitations to Vegetation Types in a Degraded Karst Trough Valley
by Fengling Gan, Hailong Shi, Xiaohong Tan, Lisha Jiang, Wuyi Li, Yuanyue Xia, Junbing Pu, Quanhou Dai, Youjin Yan and Yuchuan Fan
Forests 2025, 16(2), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16020279 - 6 Feb 2025
Viewed by 399
Abstract
Soil enzyme activities serve as the key indicators of microbial nutrient limitations. Vegetation types after farmland is returned modify both the biological and abiotic properties of the soil, thereby impacting the soil nutrient cycle and the stability of forest ecosystems. However, soil enzyme [...] Read more.
Soil enzyme activities serve as the key indicators of microbial nutrient limitations. Vegetation types after farmland is returned modify both the biological and abiotic properties of the soil, thereby impacting the soil nutrient cycle and the stability of forest ecosystems. However, soil enzyme activities and microbial nutrient limitations in degraded karst forests under different vegetation types after farmland return remain unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and microbial resource limitations in different vegetation types (grasslands (G), transitional grass–shrub (SG), shrubland (S), and secondary forest (F)) after returning farmland on dip and anti-dip slopes in a karst trough valley. The relationships among the factors influencing soil enzyme activities were analyzed to identify the drivers of microbial nutrient limitation. The results revealed that soil enzyme activities and physicochemical properties were significantly greater on anti-dip slopes than on dip slopes. Total nitrogen (27.4%) and bulk density (24.4%) influenced mainly soil enzyme activity and its stoichiometric ratio, whereas carbon and phosphorus limitations impacted soil microorganisms on the dip slopes of the F and G vegetation types. The soil physicochemical properties and enzyme characteristics accounted for 85.5% and 75.6%, respectively, of the observed influence. Notably, the total phosphorus content (36.8%) on the anti-dip erosion slope was significantly greater than that on the other slopes. These factors, especially bedrock strata dip and vegetation type, significantly affect soil enzyme activity. This study confirms that vegetation type enhances soil enzyme activities on anti-dip erosion slopes, providing a scientific basis for karst ecosystem restoration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Soil)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The influence of vegetation type on the physicochemical properties of soil in dip/anti-dip erosion slopes. Note: (<b>a</b>) SWC: soil water content; (<b>b</b>) BD: soil bulk density; (<b>c</b>) TSP: total soil porosity; (<b>d</b>) PH: pH; (<b>e</b>) OC: organic carbon; (<b>f</b>) TN: total nitrogen content; (<b>g</b>) TP: total phosphorus; G: four stages: grasslands; SG: transitional grass–shrub; S: shrubland; F: secondary forest. Significant differences between treatments, denoted by different asterisk number, “*” is statistically significant at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level; and the “**” is statistically significant at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 level; “***” is statistically significant at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 level. The graph also presents the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Soil enzyme activities and its stoichiometry under different vegetation type on dip/anti-dip erosion slope. Note: Samples from different vegetation types at dip/anti-dip slopes, respectively. (<b>a</b>) AKP: acid phosphatase; (<b>b</b>) BDC: β-D-cellobiosidase; (<b>c</b>) BG: β-1,4-glucosidase; (<b>d</b>) BNA: β-1,4- N-acetylglucosaminidase; (<b>e</b>) LAP: L-leucine aminopeptidase; (<b>f</b>) E<sub>N:P</sub>: the ratio of (BNA + LAP) and AKP; (<b>g</b>) E<sub>C:N</sub>: the ratio of (BG + BDC): (BNA + LAP); (<b>h</b>) E<sub>C:P</sub>: the ratio of (BG + BDC):AKP; G: four stages: grasslands; SG: transitional grass–shrub stages; S: shrubland stage; F: secondary forest stage; Significant differences between treatments, denoted by different asterisk number, “*” is statistically significant at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level. The graph also presents the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation heatmap of soil physicochemical properties and soil enzyme activities under different vegetation types on dip and anti-dip slopes. Note: All abbreviations in this figure are consistent with those in <a href="#forests-16-00279-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> and <a href="#forests-16-00279-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>. Significant differences between treatments, denoted by different asterisk number, “*” is statis-tically significant at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level; and the “**” is statistically significant at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Redundancy analysis of the correlation between soil physicochemical properties and soil enzyme activities and the interpretation rate of each variable. Note: all abbreviations in this figure are consistent with those in <a href="#forests-16-00279-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> and <a href="#forests-16-00279-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A scatter plot of soil enzymatic stoichiometry showing the general pattern of microbial resource limitation. Note: all abbreviations in this figure are consistent with those in <a href="#forests-16-00279-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> and <a href="#forests-16-00279-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Variation of vector length and angle under different vegetation types on dip and anti-dip slopes. Note: all abbreviations in this figure are consistent with those in <a href="#forests-16-00279-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> and <a href="#forests-16-00279-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>. Significant differences between treatments, denoted by different lowercase letters (e.g., a, b), are statistically significant at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 level. The graph also displays the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4294 KiB  
Article
Revealing the Exacerbated Drought Stress Impacts on Regional Vegetation Ecosystems in Karst Areas with Vegetation Indices: A Case Study of Guilin, China
by Zijian Gao, Wen He, Yuefeng Yao and Jinjun Huang
Sustainability 2025, 17(3), 1308; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031308 - 6 Feb 2025
Viewed by 526
Abstract
Global warming has exacerbated the impact of regional drought on vegetation ecosystems, especially in typical karst areas with fragile ecosystems that are more severely affected by drought. However, the response mechanisms of vegetation ecosystems in karst areas to drought stress are still uncertain. [...] Read more.
Global warming has exacerbated the impact of regional drought on vegetation ecosystems, especially in typical karst areas with fragile ecosystems that are more severely affected by drought. However, the response mechanisms of vegetation ecosystems in karst areas to drought stress are still uncertain. With drought stress in the summer of 2022, we examined the spatiotemporal patterns of drought in a World Heritage karst site, Guilin, China, and revealed the exacerbated drought impacts on vegetation ecosystems in karst areas with various vegetation indices. Firstly, we analyzed the spatiotemporal characteristics of drought from 2000 to 2022, utilizing the temperature vegetation dryness index (TVDI), highlighting the intra-annual variability of drought in 2022. Additionally, we compared the responses of different vegetation types to drought stress in karst and non-karst areas and explored the exacerbated impacts of drought stress on vegetation ecosystems within the same year with three vegetation indices, namely, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Leaf Area index (LAI), and Gross Primary Production (GPP) in karst areas. The results showed that drought started in July and persisted from August to November at moderate to severe levels (with severe drought in September), eventually easing in December. Karst areas exhibited severe drought (TVDI = 0.76), which more significantly impacted regional vegetation ecosystems than those in non-karst areas. Different vegetation types also experienced greater drought stress in karst areas compared to non-karst areas. The vegetation indices increased at the early- to mid-stages of drought (July to September) compared to those in the baseline year (2020–2021), mainly due to the increase in non-karst areas. However, vegetation indices decreased at the late drought stage (October to November), primarily due to the decrease in karst areas, indicating that the karst topography exacerbated the impact of drought on regional vegetation ecosystems. Since LAI and GPP exhibited similar changing patterns to TVDI, with GPP showing particularly strong alignment, they can be used to reveal the response mechanisms of ecosystems to drought stress in karst areas. We emphasize the importance of monitoring the responses of vegetation ecosystems to climate-induced droughts stress and enhancing their resilience to future climatic challenges, particularly in karst areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impact and Adaptation of Climate Change on Natural Ecosystems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Guilin karst and non-karst area distribution patterns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Drought trend analysis in Guilin city based on the standardized precipitation index over 12 months (SPI-12), standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index over 12 months (SPEI-12), and TVDI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution of the TVDI in 2022, the black line represents the karst area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution and trend in drought in Guilin city: (<b>a</b>) Theil–Sen median drought trend based on the TVDI from 2000 to 2022; (<b>b</b>) significance test of drought changes using the Mann–Kendall test from 2000 to 2022; (<b>c</b>) coefficient of variation of the TVDI from 2000 to 2022, the black line represents the karst area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Monthly spatial patterns of the TVDI in 2022 in Guilin city.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Monthly TVDI values in karst and non-karst areas of Guilin city in 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of TVDI among different vegetation types between karst and non-karst areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The proportion of vegetation area and their distribution in drought severity categories in the karst area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Monthly variations in the average NDVI (<b>a</b>), LAI (<b>b</b>), and GPP (<b>c</b>) values during the second half of 2022 compared to those in the baseline year (2020–2021) in Guilin city. The background colors in the figure represent different phases of the drought: the yellow part represents the early to mid-drought phase, the orange part represents the late drought phase, and the green part represents the drought fade-away period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Differences in the NDVI (<b>a</b>), LAI (<b>b</b>), and GPP (<b>c</b>) values in the karst and non-karst areas between the 2022 drought period and the baseline year (2020–2021).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 10553 KiB  
Article
Changes in Ecological–Production–Social Functions in Karst Areas: Insight from Guizhou Province, South China Karst
by Rong Zhao, Kangning Xiong, Anjun Lan, Qiwei Chen, Zhaojun Liu, Fangli Feng and Nana Yu
Land 2025, 14(2), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020209 - 21 Jan 2025
Viewed by 440
Abstract
The ecosystems and human social systems in karst areas are undergoing rapid development. In this context, effectively identifying changes in the various functions of karst areas is crucial for formulating accurate sustainable development policies. However, few studies have discussed the ecological, production, and [...] Read more.
The ecosystems and human social systems in karst areas are undergoing rapid development. In this context, effectively identifying changes in the various functions of karst areas is crucial for formulating accurate sustainable development policies. However, few studies have discussed the ecological, production, and social functions of karst areas within an integrated framework. Therefore, this paper utilizes comprehensive evaluation methods, standard deviation classification, and coordination models to analyze the spatiotemporal changes in these functions of karst areas from 2000 to 2020. The results indicate that over the 20-year period, the ecological function, production function, and social function in karst areas have shown an annual growth trend with noticeable spatiotemporal differentiation. The dominant functions of the area have undergone significant changes, with the ecological function being dominant in 2000, the production function becoming dominant in 2010, and the social function taking the lead in 2020. Over the past 20 years, the lagged development type has remained the predominant combined function type. The coordination levels among the three functions have significantly improved, with the coordination between the ecological function and the production function transitioning from non-coordination to coordination in 2010. Furthermore, the coordination between the ecological function and the social function, and between the production function and the social function, achieved coordination status in 2020. This study enhances the understanding of the multifunctional evolution in karst areas and provides theoretical and practical guidance for ecological restoration, industrial development, and social reconstruction in karst areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Karst Environment and Global Change)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of karst areas in Guizhou, Southwest China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial-temporal change in ecological, production, social, and comprehensive functions in the Guizhou karst area from 2000 to 2020. <span class="html-italic">Notes:</span> The natural breaks method was applied to categorize the functional values of counties from 2000 to 2020 into five levels. Ecological function: low [0, 0.159), mid-low [0.159, 0.246), mid [0.246, 0.371), mid-high [0.371, 0.534), high [0.534, 0.887). Production function: low [0, 0.116), mid-low [0.116, 0.189), mid [0.189, 0.278), mid-high [0.278, 0.388), high [0.388, 0.732). Social function: low [0, 0.075), mid-low [0.075, 0.142), mid [0.142, 0.242), mid-high [0.242, 0.407), high [0.407, 0.720). Comprehensive function: low [0, 0.350), mid-low [0.350, 0.503), mid [0.503, 0.721), mid-high [0.721, 1.020), high [1.020, 1.583).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Kernel density distribution of comprehensive function index in the Guizhou karst area from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Standard deviation elliptic distribution of ecological, production, and social functions in the Guizhou karst area from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of the dominant functions in the Guizhou karst area from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Summary of combined functions in the Guizhou karst area from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Distribution of the combined functions in the Guizhou karst area from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial-temporal evolution of the function’s coordination in the Guizhou karst area from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Coordinated evolution of sub-functions in the Guizhou karst area from 2000 to 2020. <span class="html-italic">Notes:</span> EF (ecological function); PF (production function); SF (social function).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Coordinated mechanism of ecological, production, and social functions.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1232 KiB  
Article
Biochar Application and Mowing Independently and Interactively Influence Soil Enzyme Activity and Carbon Sequestration in Karst and Red Soils in Southern China
by Wenjia Luo, Daniel F. Petticord, Shiwen Zhu, Shaowu Zhu, Yuanlong Wu, Xun Yi, Xinyue Wang, Yili Guo and Xuxin Song
Agronomy 2025, 15(1), 252; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010252 - 20 Jan 2025
Viewed by 660
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC), a critical component of the global carbon cycle, represents the largest terrestrial carbon reservoir, and is thus a major component of influencing climate regulation and ecosystem health. Grasslands store substantial carbon in their soils, but this carbon reservoir is [...] Read more.
Soil organic carbon (SOC), a critical component of the global carbon cycle, represents the largest terrestrial carbon reservoir, and is thus a major component of influencing climate regulation and ecosystem health. Grasslands store substantial carbon in their soils, but this carbon reservoir is easily degraded by both grazing and mowing, particularly in vulnerable karst landscapes. This study investigates the potential of biochar, a carbon-rich soil amendment, as a management tool to maintain SOC or mitigate the degradation of SOC during mowing in karst grasslands in Southern China, using both red acidic and calcareous soils as experimental variables. T SOC fractions, soil enzyme activities, and soil pH were measured to determine the effect of mowing and biochar application on carbon stability and microbial activity. Consistent with expectations, mowing increases belowground biomass and promotes carbon loss through increased microbial activity, particularly in calcareous soils where mowing also decreases soil pH, increasing acidity and reducing the stability of Ca–carbon complexes. Biochar, however, counteracted these effects, increasing both particulate organic carbon (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC), especially in red soils where the addition of biochar greatly increased soil pH (from 5.4 to 6.33) (an effect not observed in the already-alkaline karst soils). Enzyme activities related to carbon degradation, such as β-D-Glucosidase and peroxidase, increased in biochar-amended soils (β-D-Glucosidase increased from 12.77 to 24.53 nmol/g/h and peroxidase increased from 1.1 to 2.36 mg/g/2h), each of which contribute to the degradation of carbon containing organic matter so that it may be ultimately stored in more recalcitrant forms. Mowing led to reduced polyphenol oxidase activity, but the presence of biochar mitigated these losses, protecting SOC pools (increased from 0.03 to 0.79 mg/g/2h). This study highlights biochar as an effective tool for enhancing SOC stability in karst grasslands, particularly in acidic soils, and suggests that integrating biochar into mowing regimes may optimize carbon sequestration while reducing fire risk. These findings offer valuable theoretical guidance for developing sustainable land management in sensitive ecosystems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effect of mowing and biochar on soil particulate organic carbon (POC) (<b>a</b>) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) (<b>b</b>) in different soil types (no biochar, CK; with biochar, B; red soil, R; and calcareous soil, C). Values represent mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4). Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments under no mowing, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments under mowing (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). Asterisk indicates significant differences between mowing and no mowing treatments (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; and *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effect of mowing and biochar on polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (<b>a</b>), peroxidase (PER) (<b>b</b>), β-D-Glucosidase (βG) (<b>c</b>), and leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) (<b>d</b>) in different soil types (no biochar, CK; with biochar, B; red soil, R; and calcareous soil, C). Values represent mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4). Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments under no mowing, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments under mowing (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). Asterisk indicates significant differences between mowing and no mowing treatments (** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; and *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of mowing and biochar on belowground biomass (<b>a</b>), pH (<b>b</b>), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (<b>c</b>), ammonium nitrogen (NH<sub>4</sub>-N) (<b>d</b>), nitrate nitrogen (NO<sub>3</sub>-N) (<b>e</b>), and total available nitrogen (AN) (<b>f</b>) in different soil types (no biochar, CK; with biochar, B; red soil, R; and calcareous soil, C). Values represent mean ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4). Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments under no mowing, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments under mowing (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). Asterisk indicates significant differences between mowing and no mowing treatments (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; and *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 8949 KiB  
Article
Distribution, Risk Assessment, and Quantitative Source Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in a Typical Agricultural City of East-Central China
by Wenyue Du, Peng Zeng, Shi Yu, Fan Liu and Ping’an Sun
Land 2025, 14(1), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010066 - 1 Jan 2025
Viewed by 884
Abstract
The land use in agricultural areas contributes to economic growth while concurrently accompanied by a series of environmental pollution issues. Xingguo County, Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, is a typical agricultural area with selenium-rich soil, and the rice and navel oranges grown there have [...] Read more.
The land use in agricultural areas contributes to economic growth while concurrently accompanied by a series of environmental pollution issues. Xingguo County, Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, is a typical agricultural area with selenium-rich soil, and the rice and navel oranges grown there have high nutritional value. This study analyzed the distribution of heavy metals in the soil of this area through the kriging interpolation method, evaluated the risks of heavy metals in the soil using different pollution index methods, and quantitatively analyzed their sources using principal component analysis (PCA) and positive matrix factorization (PMF), with the aim of protecting the ecological resources of this area and providing theoretical references for avoiding heavy metal pollution of crops in the soil. The research results indicate the following: (1) Based on the background values of Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province, all heavy metals have caused pollution to the soil except for As and Hg, among which Cd poses the highest potential ecological risk in the study area. According to the values of the Environmental Quality Standards for Soil (EQSS), the concentrations of heavy metals have not exceeded the standards and have relatively low potential ecological risks. (2) In terms of health risks, all soil heavy metals basically do not bring non-carcinogenic risks but acceptable carcinogenic risks to adults and children, except for Cd. The carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of soil heavy metals for children are higher than those for adults, and the main exposure route is ingestion. Among different land use types, the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of soil heavy metals in orchards are the highest. (3) Combining the kriging interpolation method and the PCA and PMF models, it can be determined that there are two main sources of heavy metals in the study area: one is natural and the other is anthropogenic. Among the anthropogenic sources, agricultural sources contribute the most to soil heavy metal pollution. Through these research results, it can be found that soil heavy metal detection should be conducted in agricultural land, and risk-based management measures should be implemented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Soil Quality and Management in Karst Ecosystem II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the study region and sampling sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Concentration and exceeding rate of heavy metals in soil from different land uses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>SFPI values of heavy metals in soils of different land uses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients among heavy metals in soil. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Source profiles and source contributions of soil heavy metals. (<b>a</b>) source contributions of soil heavy metals by factor 1; (<b>b</b>) source contributions of soil heavy metals by factor 2; (<b>c</b>) source contributions of soil heavy metals by factor 3; (<b>d</b>) source contributions of soil heavy metals by factor 4; (<b>e</b>) source contributions of soil heavy metals by factor 5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of heavy metals in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Factor profiles of heavy metal sources identified by PMF.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 7581 KiB  
Article
Prediction of Potential Habitat Distributions and Climate Change Impacts on the Rare Species Woonyoungia septentrionalis (Magnoliaceae) in China Based on MaxEnt
by Weihao Yao, Zenghui Wang, Yu Fan, Danyang Liu, Zeyang Ding, Yumei Zhou, Shuyue Hu, Wei Zhang and Jing Ou
Plants 2025, 14(1), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010086 - 30 Dec 2024
Viewed by 674
Abstract
Changes in species’ habitats provide important insights into the effects of climate change. Woonyoungia septentrionalis, a critically endangered species endemic to karst ecosystems, has a highly restricted distribution and is a key biological resource. Despite its ecological importance, the factors influencing its [...] Read more.
Changes in species’ habitats provide important insights into the effects of climate change. Woonyoungia septentrionalis, a critically endangered species endemic to karst ecosystems, has a highly restricted distribution and is a key biological resource. Despite its ecological importance, the factors influencing its habitat suitability and distribution remain poorly understood. This study employed ecological niche modeling to predict the potential distribution of Woonyoungia septentrionalis across China and analyzed shifts in centroid location to explore migration pathways under current and future climate scenarios. The model exhibited high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.988), indicating its robustness in assessing habitat suitability. Under current climatic conditions, Woonyoungia septentrionalis is predominantly found in the Guizhou–Guangxi border region, southeastern Yunnan, eastern Sichuan, southeastern Tibet, and parts of Chongqing, Hunan, and Hubei. Among these, the Guizhou-Guangxi border represents the primary suitable habitat. Temperature factors, particularly bio6 (minimum temperature of the coldest month) and bio7 (annual temperature range), were the most significant determinants of habitat suitability, contributing 43.29% and 12.65%, respectively. Soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) accounted for 15.82%, while precipitation had a relatively minor impact. Under future climate scenarios, suitable habitats for Woonyoungia septentrionalis are projected to shrink and shift toward higher altitudes and latitudes, increasing the risk of extinction due to the “mountain trap” effect, where migration is constrained by limited habitat at higher elevations. Stable habitats, particularly in Libo (Guizhou) and Huanjiang (Guangxi), are identified as critical refugia. We recommend prioritizing shrinking and stable habitats in Guizhou, Guangxi, and Yunnan for in situ conservation. Ex situ conservation efforts should focus on areas identified based on key environmental factors and predicted migration pathways to ensure the species’ long-term survival. This study provides both theoretical and practical guidance for the conservation of this species and its vulnerable habitat. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Photographs (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and occurrence records (<b>d</b>) of <span class="html-italic">W. septentrionalis</span> used in the MaxEnt model. All photographs were taken by the author.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Performances of MaxEnt model in simulating and predicting the potential distribution of <span class="html-italic">W. septentrionalis</span> in different settings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The validation of the MaxEnt model predicting <span class="html-italic">W. septentrionalis</span> distribution: (<b>a</b>) omission rate and (<b>b</b>) ROC curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Jackknife test for environmental variables.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Response curves of <span class="html-italic">W. septentrionalis</span> to important climatic and edaphic factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution of suitable areas of <span class="html-italic">W. septentrionalis</span> under current climatic conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Areas (<b>A</b>) and area changes (<b>B</b>) of predicted suitable habitat in different climatic periods based on MaxEnt model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Map of predicted distribution of suitable areas. Predicted distribution under SSP126 scenario in the 2050s (<b>a</b>), 2070s (<b>d</b>), under the SSP245 scenario in the 2050s (<b>b</b>), 2070s (<b>e</b>), under the SSP585 scenario in the 2050s (<b>c</b>), and 2070s (<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial change patterns of suitable habitats of <span class="html-italic">W. septentrionalis</span> under different climate scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The centroid change in suitable habitats of <span class="html-italic">W. septentrionalis</span> under different climate scenarios.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 40095 KiB  
Article
Enhanced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Western Sichuan Utilizing DCGAN-Generated Samples
by Yuanxin Tong, Hongxia Luo, Zili Qin, Hua Xia and Xinyao Zhou
Land 2025, 14(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010034 - 27 Dec 2024
Viewed by 495
Abstract
The scarcity of landslide samples poses a critical challenge, impeding the broad application of machine learning techniques in landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA). To address this issue, this study introduces a novel approach leveraging a deep convolutional generative adversarial network (DCGAN) for data augmentation [...] Read more.
The scarcity of landslide samples poses a critical challenge, impeding the broad application of machine learning techniques in landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA). To address this issue, this study introduces a novel approach leveraging a deep convolutional generative adversarial network (DCGAN) for data augmentation aimed at enhancing the efficacy of various machine learning methods in LSA, including support vector machines (SVMs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and residual neural networks (ResNets). Experimental results present substantial enhancements across all three models, with accuracy improved by 2.18%, 2.57%, and 5.28%, respectively. In-depth validation based on large landslide image data demonstrates the superiority of the DCGAN-ResNet, achieving a remarkable landslide prediction accuracy of 91.31%. Consequently, the generation of supplementary samples via the DCGAN is an effective strategy for enhancing the performance of machine learning models in LSA, underscoring the promise of this methodology in advancing early landslide warning systems in western Sichuan. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study area. (<b>a</b>) Location of the study area; (<b>b</b>) elevation and historical landslide location; (<b>c</b>) geological structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of landslides and non-landslides.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Environmental factor maps of the landslide events. (<b>a</b>) Elevation; (<b>b</b>) aspect; (<b>c</b>) plan curvature; (<b>d</b>) profile curvature; (<b>e</b>) slope; (<b>f</b>) SPI; (<b>g</b>) STI; (<b>h</b>) TWI; (<b>i</b>) relief amplitude; (<b>j</b>) distance to faults; (<b>k</b>) distance to road; (<b>l</b>) distance to river; (<b>m</b>) lithology; (<b>n</b>) landform; (<b>o</b>) land use; (<b>p</b>) soil; (<b>q</b>) precipitation; (<b>r</b>) NDVI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Technological route.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Deep convolutional generative adversarial model architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results of GeoDetector analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Accuracy and AUC of landslide susceptibility assessment models trained with additional samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>ROC curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Landslide susceptibility maps using CNN and ResNet in western Sichuan. (<b>a</b>) Aba prefecture in Sichuan, (<b>b</b>) Panzhihua, Liangshan, and Ya’an.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Percentage of landslide sensitivity zones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Validation of landslide susceptibility mapping results based on large landslide data. (<b>a</b>) Jiuzhaigou landslide group, (<b>b</b>) Maoxian Diexi mountain landslide, (<b>c</b>) Longxi mountain landslide in Wenchuan, (<b>d</b>) Jinchuan Danzhamu mountain landslide, (<b>e</b>) Han Yuan mountain landslide in Ya’an, (<b>f</b>) Jiulong County mountain landslide in Garze.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4046 KiB  
Article
Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Increases with Tree Age in Karstic Rocky Desertification Areas of Southwestern China
by Ying Li, Zhongfeng Zhang, Shuhui Tan, Shihong Lyv, Longwu Zhou, Limin Yu, Chungui Tang and Yeming You
Forests 2025, 16(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16010024 - 26 Dec 2024
Viewed by 577
Abstract
The diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is a crucial indicator for determining the productivity of forest ecosystems and for assessing degraded areas. At present, the effect of tree age and vegetation restoration strategies on AMF diversity in karstic rocky desertification areas remains [...] Read more.
The diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is a crucial indicator for determining the productivity of forest ecosystems and for assessing degraded areas. At present, the effect of tree age and vegetation restoration strategies on AMF diversity in karstic rocky desertification areas remains unclear. This study investigated AMF diversity and abundance in soils planted with Delavaya toxocarpa Franch. for 18, 11, and 4 years in a karstic desertification area of southwestern China. Additionally, it explored AMF community composition in soils of an 18-year-old D. toxocarpa plantation, a secondary forest naturally restored since 2005, and an abandoned land with no human intervention. High-throughput sequencing revealed that the mean Chao1 and richness indices of AMF increased with tree age, as indicated by the highest AMF α-diversity in 18-year-old plantations. The various vegetation restoration strategies resulted in significant differences in AMF abundance and evenness indices. Although no significant differences (p = 0.33) were found between the different restoration strategies, the AMF α-diversity index showed a decreasing trend from plantation forest to secondary forest and then to abandoned land. Overall, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and available phosphorus (AP) significantly influence AMF diversity. Additionally, soil TN, AP, hydrolysable nitrogen (HN), and urease activity (URE) shape AMF community composition. These properties varied with tree age and vegetation restoration strategies. Our findings point to good recovery results of artificial afforestation in karstic rocky desertification areas. The process accelerates vegetation restoration and enhances the mutually beneficial relationship between vegetation and AMF compared with natural restoration. However, the tree age selected in this study only represents the forest stands before mature forests, and the microbial diversity and structure in karst rocky desertification soils after mature and over-mature forest stands remain to be studied. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical distribution of field sampling sites in karst desertification area of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Community composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) with different tree ages and vegetation restoration strategies. P18, P11, and P4 represent <span class="html-italic">Delavaya toxocarpa</span> plantations planted in 2005, 2012, and 2019, respectively; SF is naturally restored secondary forest; and AL is naturally restored grassland after abandonment of land; stacked columns are relative abundance of taxa at taxonomic level of each order, family, and genus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>NMDS of AMF community composition based on operational taxonomic units (OTUs) for different tree ages and vegetation restoration strategies. P18, P11, and P4 represent <span class="html-italic">Delavaya toxocarpa</span> plantations planted in 2005, 2012, and 2019; SF is the naturally restored secondary forest; and AL is the naturally restored grassland after the abandonment of the land; the points of different colors represent different sample plots, and the calculations in all sample plots were based on the Bray–Curtis metrics, with a stress value of 0.13 &lt; 0.2; therefore, the results are well represented.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of different tree ages and vegetation restoration strategies on α-diversity indices. P18, P11, and P4 are <span class="html-italic">Delavaya toxocarpa</span> forests planted in 2005, 2012, and 2019; SF represents naturally restored secondary forest; and AL represents grassland naturally restored after abandonment. (<b>A</b>) represents the Chao1 index, (<b>B</b>) represents the Shannon index, (<b>C</b>) represents AMF species richness in the rhizosphere soil, and (<b>D</b>) represents the Pielou index. All results for different tree ages or vegetation restoration strategies are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 2). In the figure, * indicates significantly different plots under different tree ages and vegetation restoration strategies after multiple comparisons using the LSD (least significant difference) method (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Redundancy analysis (RDA) between AMF community composition and soil-related indicators in different sites. Different-colored circles represent different plots: P18, P11, and P4 correspond to <span class="html-italic">Delavaya toxocarpa</span> plantations established in 2005, 2012, and 2019, respectively; SF represents naturally regenerated secondary forest without human intervention; AL represents grassland naturally regenerated after abandonment; SOC: soil organic carbon; TN: soil total nitrogen; HN: soil hydrolyzed nitrogen; TP: soil total phosphorus; AP: soil available phosphorus; K: soil potassium; AK: soil available potassium; Ca: soil exchangeable calcium; Mg: soil exchangeable magnesium; URE: soil urease activity; CAT: soil catalase activity; ALP: soil alkaline phosphatase activity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Heat map of correlation between soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities with AMF genus. * represents significant correlation at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and ** represents highly significant correlation at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. SOC: soil organic carbon; TN: soil total nitrogen; HN: soil hydrolyzed nitrogen; TP: soil total phosphorus; AP: soil available phosphorus; K: soil potassium; AK: soil available potassium; Ca: soil exchangeable calcium; Mg: soil exchangeable magnesium; URE: soil urease activity; CAT: soil catalase activity; ALP: soil alkaline phosphatase activity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Structural equation modeling (SEM) describing the influences of tree age and vegetation restoration strategies on the community composition and OTU richness of AMF. SOC: organic carbon; TN: total nitrogen; AP: quick-acting phosphorus; HN: hydrolyzed nitrogen; URE: soil urease activity; AMF richness: AMF OTU richness; AMF community: AMF community composition. * represents significant correlation at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and ** represents highly significant correlation at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. Numbers adjacent to the arrows indicate standardized path coefficients. The R<sup>2</sup> value above each variable represents the proportion of the variance explained by the SEM model.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2036 KiB  
Article
Soil Organic Carbon Storage and Stratification in Land Use Types in the Source Area of the Tarim River Basin
by Qin Zhang, Chunfang Yue, Pujia Yu, Hailiang Xu, Jie Wu and Fangyu Sheng
Sustainability 2024, 16(24), 11255; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411255 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 676
Abstract
Accurate analysis of soil organic carbon (SOC) under different land uses in ecologically fragile arid zones is essential for effective regulatory measures and improvement of ecological quality. This study selected the ecologically fragile Tarim River source area as an example, aiming to quantitatively [...] Read more.
Accurate analysis of soil organic carbon (SOC) under different land uses in ecologically fragile arid zones is essential for effective regulatory measures and improvement of ecological quality. This study selected the ecologically fragile Tarim River source area as an example, aiming to quantitatively assess the SOC content, storage, carbon sequestration potential, and stratification ratio (SR) of different ecological land use types. Soil depths from 0–50 cm were determined and analyzed using the K2Cr2O7-H2SO4 oxidation method, the equivalent soil mass method and mathematical statistics. Forest, shrubland, and grassland ecological land types were included. The results show the following: (1) Both SOC content and storage showed a decrease with increasing soil depth. The total SOC content and storage sequence from high to low were natural forest, grassland, and shrubland. (2) There are variations in the SOC sequestration potential among the different ecological land types and shrubland (40.64 Mg C ha−1) > grassland (37.69 Mg C ha−1). (3) The SRs of the SOC in the forest were significantly greater than those in the shrubland and grassland. The different ecological land types had significant impacts on SR2, SR3, and SR4. SR2 could serve as a reliable index for assessing the impact of management practices on soil quality. The study area has a high potential for soil carbon sequestration in the future under these ecological conservation and management measures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land Use/Cover Change and Its Environmental Effects: Second Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the study area and the sampling sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Land use classification map of the study area for (<b>a</b>) 2015, (<b>b</b>) 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mean values (±standard error) of SOC content at five depths in soils of different ecological land types. The bars represent standard errors. Values with the same capital letters (ecological land type) and lowercase letters (soil depths) indicate no significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Mean values of total SOCs at five depths in the different ecological land use types. The bars represent standard errors. Values with the different capital letters (ecological land type) indicate significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. (<b>b</b>) The carbon sequestration potential of SOC under the different ecological land use types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The SR of the SOC content under the different ecological land types. The bars represent standard errors. Values with the different capital letters (ecological land type) indicate significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. F and <span class="html-italic">p</span> values are the ANOVA results at the same soil depth.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2627 KiB  
Article
How Does the Mulching Management of Phyllostachys Praecox Affect Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Nutrient Limitation in Karst Bamboo Forest Ecosystems?
by Long Tong, Lianghua Qi, Lijie Chen, Fengling Gan, Qingping Zeng, Hongyan Li, Bin Li, Yuan Liu, Ping Liu, Xiaoying Zeng, Lisha Jiang, Xiaohong Tan and Hailong Shi
Forests 2024, 15(12), 2253; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122253 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 943
Abstract
Phyllostachys praecox is a valuable tree species in karst ecosystems, but improper mulching practices can worsen soil degradation. Understanding soil nutrient limitations is crucial for successful restoration and sustainable development. However, it remains unclear whether and how mulching management of Phyllostachys praecox affects [...] Read more.
Phyllostachys praecox is a valuable tree species in karst ecosystems, but improper mulching practices can worsen soil degradation. Understanding soil nutrient limitations is crucial for successful restoration and sustainable development. However, it remains unclear whether and how mulching management of Phyllostachys praecox affects soil enzyme stoichiometry and nutrient limitation in karst areas. Here, we conducted a field experiment in Chongqing karst bamboo forest ecosystems with four mulching treatments: 1-year (T1), 2-years (T2), 1-year and recovery and 1-year (T3), and no mulching (CK). We investigated the activities of the C-acquiring enzyme β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), N-acquiring enzymes L-leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) and β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase (BNA), as well as P-acquiring enzyme phosphatase activity (AP), to assess the limitations of C, N or P and identify the main factors influencing soil microbial nutrient limitation. Compared with the CK treatment, both the T2 and T3 management treatments significantly increased the SOC, TN, MBC, and MBN. Furthermore, the soil enzyme stoichiometric ratio in the karst bamboo forests deviated from the global ecosystem ratio of 1:1:1. T1 > T3 > CK > T2 presented higher values of C/(C + N) and C/(C + P), with T1 having values that were 1.10 and 1.12 greater than those of T2, respectively. Additionally, there was a significant negative correlation between microbial C and N limitations and total nutrients, but a positive correlation with microbial biomass ratios. In conclusion, changes in mulching management of Phyllostachys praecox affect soil enzyme stoichiometry activities and their ratios by influencing total nutrients and microbial biomass ratios. This study suggests an alternate year cover pattern (mulching in one year and resting in the next) as a scientific management approach for bamboo forests, contributing to a better understanding of nutrient limitation mechanisms in karst bamboo forest ecosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Storage and Cycling in Forest Soil)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Locations of this study and the experimental treatments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Differences of soil enzymatic activity and enzymatic stoichiometry under different Phyllostachys praecox mulching management strategies. Note: soil C-acquiring enzymes include BG (β-1,4-glucosidase) for carbon acquisition, LAP (L-leucine aminopeptidase) and BNA (β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase) for nitrogen acquisition, and AP (phosphatase activity) for phosphorus acquisition; E<sub>C:N</sub>, E<sub>C:P</sub>, and E<sub>N:P</sub> indicate the ratios of BG to LAP and BNA, BG to AP, and LAP and BNA to AP, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups in the same column (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Enzymatic stoichiometry of the relative proportions between C acquisition and N acquisition versus C acquisition and P acquisition (<b>a</b>); linear regression analysis of vector length and angle (<b>b</b>); variation in vector length with the grain mulching management (<b>c</b>); and variation in vector angle with grain mulching management (<b>d</b>). Note: C/(C + N) and C/(C + P) is the ratios of BG to (BG + LAP + BNA) and BG to (BG + AP), respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlations between environmental factors and their associations with soil enzyme activities, enzymatic stoichiometry, and both soil physicochemical properties (<b>a</b>); and microbial biomass properties (<b>b</b>) with their stoichiometry. Note: BD is the soil bulk density; NP is the noncapillary porosity; TPO is the capillary porosity; CP is the total porosity; SWC is the soil water content; SOC is the soil organic carbon; TK is the total potassium; TP is the total phosphorus; TN is the total nitrogen; C:N, C:P, and N:P indicate the ratios of SOC to TN, SOC to TP, and TN to TP, respectively; MBC, MBN, and MBP indicate soil microbial biomass C, N, and P; MBC:MBN, MBC:MBP, and MBN:MBP indicate the ratios of MBC to MBN, MBC to MBP, and MBN to MBP, respectively; soil C-acquiring enzymes include BG (β-1,4-glucosidase) for carbon acquisition, LAP (L-leucine aminopeptidase) and BNA (β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase) for nitrogen acquisition, and AP (phosphatase activity) for phosphorus acquisition; E<sub>C:N</sub>, E<sub>C:P</sub>, and E<sub>N:P</sub> indicate the ratios of BG to LAP and BNA, BG to AP, and LAP and BNA to AP, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) was employed to explore potential pathways linking soil physicochemical properties and microbial biomass properties with the microbial nutrient limitations of nitrogen (N) and carbon (C): (<b>a</b>) the vector angle represents the extent of microbial nutrient limitation for N; (<b>c</b>) the vector length represents the degree of microbial nutrient limitation for C; (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) show the overall effects of microbial limitations on C and N, respectively. Note: CP is the total porosity; SWC is the soil water content; SOC is the soil organic carbon; TP is the total phosphorus; C:N and N:P indicate the ratios of SOC to TN and TN to TP, respectively; MBC, MBN, and MBP indicate the soil microbial biomass C, N, and P; MBC:MBN, MBC:MBP, and MBN:MBP indicate the ratios of MBC to MBN, MBC to MBP, and MBN to MBP, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop