Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (130)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = fractional flow reserve

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 1192 KiB  
Review
Specificities of Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure in Women
by Milica Dekleva, Ana Djordjevic, Stefan Zivkovic and Jelena Suzic Lazic
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(23), 7319; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237319 - 2 Dec 2024
Viewed by 407
Abstract
Substantial evidence from previous clinical studies, randomized trials, and patient registries confirms the existence of significant differences in cardiac morphology, pathophysiology, prevalence of specific coronary artery disease (CAD), and clinical course of myocardial infarction (MI) between men and women. The aim of this [...] Read more.
Substantial evidence from previous clinical studies, randomized trials, and patient registries confirms the existence of significant differences in cardiac morphology, pathophysiology, prevalence of specific coronary artery disease (CAD), and clinical course of myocardial infarction (MI) between men and women. The aim of this review is to investigate the impact of sex or gender on the development and clinical course of MI, the mechanisms and features of left ventricular (LV) remodeling, and heart failure (HF). The main sex-related difference in post-MI LV remodeling is adverse LV dilatation in males versus concentric LV remodeling or concentric LV hypertrophy in females. In addition, women have a higher incidence of microvascular dysfunction, which manifests as impaired coronary flow reserve, distal embolism, and a higher prevalence of the no-reflow phenomenon. Consequently, impaired myocardial perfusion after MI is more common in women than in men. Regardless of age or other comorbidities, the incidence of reinfarction, hospitalization for HF, and mortality is significantly higher in females. There is therefore a “sex paradox”: despite the lower prevalence of obstructive CAD and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), women have a higher mortality rate after MI. Different characteristics of the coronary network, such as plaque formation, microvascular dysfunction, and endothelial inflammation, as well as the prolonged time to optimal coronary flow restoration, secondary mitral regurgitation, and pulmonary vascular dysfunction, lead to a worse outcome in females. A better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for MI occurrence, LV remodeling, and HF in men and women would contribute to optimized patient therapy that would benefit both sexes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Risk factors for myocardial infarction.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 9275 KiB  
Article
Hybrid CFD PINN FSI Simulation in Coronary Artery Trees
by Nursultan Alzhanov, Eddie Y. K. Ng and Yong Zhao
Fluids 2024, 9(12), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9120280 - 25 Nov 2024
Viewed by 600
Abstract
This paper presents a novel hybrid approach that integrates computational fluid dynamics (CFD), physics-informed neural networks (PINN), and fluid–structure interaction (FSI) methods to simulate fluid flow in stenotic coronary artery trees and predict fractional flow reserve (FFR) in areas of stenosis. The primary [...] Read more.
This paper presents a novel hybrid approach that integrates computational fluid dynamics (CFD), physics-informed neural networks (PINN), and fluid–structure interaction (FSI) methods to simulate fluid flow in stenotic coronary artery trees and predict fractional flow reserve (FFR) in areas of stenosis. The primary objective is to utilize a 1D PINN model to accurately predict outlet flow conditions, effectively addressing the challenges of measuring or estimating these conditions within complex arterial networks. Validation against traditional CFD methods demonstrates strong accuracy while embedding physics-based training to ensure compliance with fundamental fluid dynamics principles. The findings indicate that the hybrid CFD PINN FSI method generates realistic outflow boundary conditions crucial for diagnosing stenosis, requiring minimal input data. By seamlessly integrating initial conditions established by the 1D PINN into FSI simulations, this approach enables precise assessments of blood flow dynamics and FFR values in stenotic regions. This innovative application of 1D PINN not only distinguishes this methodology from conventional data-driven models that rely heavily on extensive datasets but also highlights its potential to enhance our understanding of hemodynamics in pathological states. Ultimately, this research paves the way for significant advancements in non-invasive diagnostic techniques in cardiology, improving clinical decision making and patient outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The geometry of the inlet and outlets of the CT209 model. (<b>b</b>) Graph of a complex arterial network that involves 14 vessels and 5 bifurcation points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) The geometry of the inlet and outlets of the CHN13 model. (<b>b</b>) Graph of a complex arterial network that involves 10 vessels and 4 bifurcation points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) The geometry of the inlet and outlets of the CHN03 model. (<b>b</b>) Graph of a complex arterial network that involves 10 vessels and 4 bifurcation points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Inlet boundary conditions: transient velocity (<b>a</b>) and pressure (<b>b</b>) waveform of coronary blood flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic illustration of the 1D PINN algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Mesh sensitivity analysis of pressure at FFR points along the diastolic condition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Flow through a prototype of an artery CHN03: physics-informed neural network model predictions of (<b>a</b>) area, (<b>b</b>) pressure, and (<b>c</b>) velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flow through a prototype of an artery CHN13: physics-informed neural network model predictions of (<b>a</b>) area, (<b>b</b>) pressure, and (<b>c</b>) velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Flow through a prototype of an artery CHN13: physics-informed neural network model predictions of (<b>a</b>) area, (<b>b</b>) pressure, and (<b>c</b>) velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Flow through a prototype of an artery CT209: physics-informed neural network model predictions of (<b>a</b>) area, (<b>b</b>) pressure, and (<b>c</b>) velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Flow through a prototype of an artery CT209: physics-informed neural network model predictions of (<b>a</b>) area, (<b>b</b>) pressure, and (<b>c</b>) velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>FFR prediction by 1D PINN for (<b>a</b>) CHN03, (<b>b</b>) CHN13, and (<b>c</b>) CT209.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>PINN residual history for each artery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>FFR distribution in CHN03 coronary artery throughout systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle with (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) rigid and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) fluid–structure interaction (FSI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>FFR distribution in CHN13 coronary artery throughout systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle with (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) rigid and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) fluid–structure interaction (FSI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>FFR distribution in CT209 coronary artery throughout systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle with (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) rigid and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) fluid–structure interaction (FSI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>WSS distribution in CHN03 coronary artery throughout systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle with (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) rigid and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) fluid–structure interaction (FSI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>WSS distribution in CHN13 coronary artery throughout systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle with (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) rigid and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) fluid–structure interaction (FSI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>WSS distribution in CT209 coronary artery throughout systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle with (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) rigid and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) fluid–structure interaction (FSI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Comparison analysis of FFR, velocity, and WSS waveforms across cardiac cycle for artery CHN03 with rigid and flexible walls.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Comparison analysis of FFR, velocity, and WSS waveforms across cardiac cycle for artery CHN13 with rigid and flexible walls.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Comparison analysis of FFR, velocity, and WSS waveforms across cardiac cycle for artery CT209 with rigid and flexible walls.</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 822 KiB  
Case Report
Coronary Plaque Regression and Fractional Flow Reserve Improvement in a Chronic Coronary Syndrome Case: Early Optimal Medical Therapy and Fractional Flow Reserve-Computed Tomography Follow-Up Strategy
by Yuki Yoshimitsu, Toru Awaya, Naoyuki Kawagoe, Taeko Kunimasa, Raisuke Iijima and Hidehiko Hara
Diseases 2024, 12(11), 297; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12110297 - 20 Nov 2024
Viewed by 627
Abstract
Background: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone in managing chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), offering a non-invasive alternative to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Case Presentation: A 38-year-old male with diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension was treated with early and comprehensive OMT, [...] Read more.
Background: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone in managing chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), offering a non-invasive alternative to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Case Presentation: A 38-year-old male with diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension was treated with early and comprehensive OMT, including statins, ezetimibe, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), pioglitazone, and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. Insulin was introduced during the acute phase to stabilize glycemic control. His HbA1c decreased to 6.3% within 4 months. Results: Over 8 months, the patient experienced a reduction in coronary plaque burden and an improvement in fractional flow reserve (FFR) from 0.75 to 0.90, indicating enhanced coronary blood flow. Plaque volume burden decreased from 85% to 52% in key coronary segments. Conclusions: This case highlights the effectiveness of OMT, including statins, ezetimibe, SGLT2i, and pioglitazone, in achieving outcomes comparable to PCI. FFR-computed tomography follow-up is critical in guiding treatment decisions. Continued OMT is recommended if plaque stabilization is observed. If no improvement is observed, OMT should be intensified, and PCI considered as appropriate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Changes in FFR and plaque volume evaluations in coronary CTA before treatment and at the 8-month follow-up visit (<b>A</b>) The mid-LAD artery showed moderate stenosis with an FFR of 0.75. (<b>B</b>) The degree of stenosis and FFR improved to 0.90. The improvement in FFR from 0.75 to 0.90 indicates a significant enhancement in coronary blood flow. The heart rates during each CT scan were 59 and 61 beats per minute, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 584 KiB  
Article
Moderately Increased Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Suggesting Early Stage of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients with Invasively Assessed Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
by Jacek Arkowski, Marta Obremska, Przemysław Sareło and Magdalena Wawrzyńska
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6841; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226841 - 14 Nov 2024
Viewed by 660
Abstract
Background: With modern diagnostic tools, incidence ischemia with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (INOCA) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are found to be much higher than previously believed, and—as they lead to adverse cardiovascular outcomes—their causes and development are subjects [...] Read more.
Background: With modern diagnostic tools, incidence ischemia with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (INOCA) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are found to be much higher than previously believed, and—as they lead to adverse cardiovascular outcomes—their causes and development are subjects of ongoing research. There is growing evidence that coronary microvascular dysfunction might be the underlying cause of both INOCA and HFpEF. Methods: In 65 patients with effort angina but no obstructive coronary artery disease, the index of microvascular resistance and coronary flow reserve were measured invasively in the LAD. The echocardiographic parameters, including left atrial strain, left ventricular strain, and indices of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, were compared between two groups of patients: those with normal coronary microcirculation parameters and those with impaired coronary microvascular function. Results: Patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction had higher a E/E′ index than those with normal microvessel reactivity. This finding was further confirmed by ROC analysis. The groups did not differ significantly in values of other echocardiographic parameters, including the left ventricular and left atrial strain. The prevalence of classical cardiovascular risk factors was similar in both groups. Conclusions: The coexistence of impaired coronary microvascular function with moderately elevated left ventricular filling pressures might correspond to the co-development of early stages of coronary microvascular dysfunction and HFpEF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Youden’s index; E/E′ as the explanatory variable for elevated IMR (Blue—ROC curve; Red—reference line; Green—proposed cutoff point).</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1421 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Nitroglycerin-Induced Pressure Ratio Drop and Resting Full-Cycle Ratio in a Pressure Wire Study
by Chien-Boon Jong, Tsui-Shan Lu, Min-Tsun Liao, Jia-Lang Xu, Chun-Kai Chen, Jui-Cheng Kuo and Chih-Cheng Wu
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6716; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226716 - 8 Nov 2024
Viewed by 470
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The acute drop in distal coronary pressure (Pd)-to-aortic pressure (Pa) ratio after intracoronary nitroglycerin (NTG-Pd/Pa) administration is an acceptable estimate of fractional flow reserve (FFR). We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of NTG-Pd/Pa with that of the resting full-cycle ratio [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The acute drop in distal coronary pressure (Pd)-to-aortic pressure (Pa) ratio after intracoronary nitroglycerin (NTG-Pd/Pa) administration is an acceptable estimate of fractional flow reserve (FFR). We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of NTG-Pd/Pa with that of the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) in predicting the binary results of FFR. Methods: This study included two prospective studies registered under the numbers NCT04700397 and NCT03693157. Altogether, 202 vessels were included. The optimal cutoff of NTG-Pd/Pa for predicting FFR ≤ 0.8 was identified and validated in another prospective registry. We used the McNemar’s test and the DeLong method to compare the diagnostic efficiency of NTG-Pd/Pa vs. RFR in predicting FFR ≤ 0.8 in a pooled cohort. Results: NTG-Pd/Pa was strongly correlated with FFR (r = 0.945, p < 0.001). The NTG-Pd/Pa cutoff for predicting FFR ≤ 0.8 was 0.85 in both the derivation and validation cohorts. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy in predicting FFR ≤ 0.8 were higher for NTG-Pd/Pa than for RFR in the pooled cohort (AUC 0.97 vs. 0.91, p < 0.001; accuracy 91% vs. 84%, p < 0.001). The sensitivity and negative predictive values were also higher for NTG-Pd/Pa than for RFR (all p < 0.05). The specificity and positive predictive value were numerically higher for NTG-Pd/Pa than for RFR (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of NTG-Pd/Pa may surpass that of the RFR in predicting the binary results of the FFR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagram of patient flow. In the proctored cohort, 44 patients with 80 vessels are administered intracoronary NTG according to a blood pressure-based NTG dose adjustment protocol. Overall, 109 NTG-Pd/Pa measurements are performed, including 79 and 30 measurements assessed pre- and post-intervention, respectively. In contrast, the non-proctored (validation) cohort initially includes 87 patients with 130 vessels. After a quality check of the pressure tracing, six patients are excluded because of significant pressure drift (three patients), damped aortic waveform during NTG-Pd/Pa measurement (two patients), and loss of NTG-Pd/Pa value (one patient). In addition, another three vessels met the criteria of significant drift during the pre-intervention FFR assessment but passed the quality check in the post-intervention FFR assessment. Therefore, 81 patients with 157 NTG-Pd/Pa measurements are enrolled in the non-proctored cohort of the present study, including 121 and 36 measurements assessed pre- and post-intervention, respectively. The pooled cohort comprises 125 patients with 202 vessels. Overall, 264 measurements are included to evaluate the relationship between NTG-Pd/Pa and FFR, and 226 paired measurements are included to compare the diagnostic performance of NTG-Pd/Pa and RFR in predicting the binary results of the FFR. * Three vessels are excluded because of significant drift. <sup>†</sup> One vessel is excluded because of significant drift. <sup>‡</sup> Two vessels are excluded because of a lack of paired FFR assessment due to bradycardia. Abbreviations: FFR, fractional flow reserve; NTG, nitroglycerin; NTG-Pd/Pa, nitroglycerin-induced acute drop in Pd/Pa; Pa, aortic pressure; Pd, distal coronary pressure; RFR, resting full-cycle ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Receiver-operating characteristic curve and optimal cutoff of NTG-Pd/Pa for predicting a positive FFR. (<b>a</b>) Proctored and (<b>b</b>) non-proctored cohorts. The area under the curve of NTG-Pd/Pa for predicting a positive FFR is high in both cohorts, and the ischemic cutoff for NTG-Pd/Pa is identical in both cohorts. Abbreviations: FFR, fractional flow reserve; NTG-Pd/Pa, nitroglycerin-induced acute drop in Pd/Pa; Pa, aortic pressure; Pd, distal coronary pressure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatter plot of the NTG-Pd/Pa vs. FFR in the pooled cohort. The relationship between NTG-Pd/Pa and FFR is good (r = 0.945 in the pooled cohort), irrespective of the pre- or post-intervention measurement and NTG administration (100 or 200 μg). Using a cutoff of 0.80 (blue line) and 0.85 (red line) for FFR and NTG-Pd/Pa, respectively, one-tenth of the results are discordant. However, &lt;1% of the target vessels are false negative when using the 0.85 cutoff for NTG-Pd/Pa to predict the truly ischemic cutoff (FFR &lt; 0.75). Abbreviations: FFR, fractional flow reserve; NTG, nitroglycerin; NTG-Pd/Pa, nitroglycerin-induced acute drop in Pd/Pa; Pa, aortic pressure; Pd, distal coronary pressure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagnostic performance of NTG-Pd/Pa and RFR in predicting a positive FFR. The sensitivity, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of NTG-Pd/Pa for predicting a positive FFR are higher than those of the RFR. However, the specificity and PPV are high for both NTG-Pd/Pa and RFR, without a statistically significant difference. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. Abbreviations: AUC: area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve; NPV, negative predictive value; NTG-Pd/Pa, nitroglycerin-induced acute drop in the ratio of distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure; Pa, aortic pressure; Pd, distal coronary pressure; PPV, positive predictive value; RFR, resting full-cycle ratio.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1189 KiB  
Article
Fractional Flow Reserve Implications for Clinical Decision Making in Coronary Artery Disease
by Andrei Grib, Marcel Abras, Artiom Surev and Livi Grib
Life 2024, 14(10), 1326; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14101326 - 18 Oct 2024
Viewed by 761
Abstract
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is regarded as the gold standard for assessing the functional significance of coronary artery lesions. However, its utilization in clinical practice remains limited. This study aims to determine whether FFR results can influence treatment decisions for coronary artery disease [...] Read more.
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is regarded as the gold standard for assessing the functional significance of coronary artery lesions. However, its utilization in clinical practice remains limited. This study aims to determine whether FFR results can influence treatment decisions for coronary artery disease compared to visual assessments of angiographic images. We conducted a retrospective study involving 63 patients diagnosed with either chronic coronary syndrome (n = 39, 61.9%) or acute coronary syndrome (n = 24, 38.1%) who underwent an FFR assessment. Three experienced interventional cardiologists (>300 PCI procedures/year) reevaluated 105 ambiguous coronary lesions in these patients, blinded to the FFR results. The objective was to assess lesion significance and determine the treatment strategy based on a visual angiographic evaluation. The three operators reached concordant agreement (≥two operators) to perform PCI in 60 (57.1%) of the evaluated lesions based on the angiographic assessment. Of these, nine lesions (15%) were deemed functionally non-significant by FFR (FFR > 0.80). Conversely, they agreed to defer PCI in 45 (42.9%) lesions, but 4 lesions (8.9%) were found to be functionally significant (FFR ≤ 0.80) and required a re-evaluation for PCI. Visual-guided decision making by interventional cardiologists shows variability and does not always align with the functional significance of coronary lesions as determined by FFR. Incorporating FFR into routine decision making could enhance treatment accuracy and patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Ischemia and Heart Failure—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study flowchart. CAD—coronary artery disease; CA—coronary angiography; FFR—fractional flow reserve; PCI—percutaneous coronary intervention; OMT—optimal medical therapy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Fractional flow reserve assessment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>FFR measurement = Pd (distal pressure)/Pa (aortic pressure), during maximal hyperemia. Example of (<b>A</b>) non-significant FFR (&gt;0.8) and (<b>B</b>) significant FFR (≤0.8).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Discrepancy of clinical decisions with FFR assessment. Concordant agreement (≥2 out of 3 interventional cardiologists) to perform PCI for 60 lesions based on the angiographic appearance, while 9 (15%) of these had an FFR &gt; 0.8. Conversely, a concordant agreement to defer PCI in favor of OMT was reached for 45 lesions, while 4 (8.9%) of these had an FFR ≤ 0.8.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 5902 KiB  
Review
Computed Tomography Evaluation of Coronary Atherosclerosis: The Road Travelled, and What Lies Ahead
by Chadi Ayoub, Isabel G. Scalia, Nandan S. Anavekar, Reza Arsanjani, Clinton E. Jokerst, Benjamin J. W. Chow and Leonard Kritharides
Diagnostics 2024, 14(18), 2096; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14182096 - 23 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1528
Abstract
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is now endorsed by all major cardiology guidelines for the investigation of chest pain and assessment for coronary artery disease (CAD) in appropriately selected patients. CAD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. There is extensive literature to [...] Read more.
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is now endorsed by all major cardiology guidelines for the investigation of chest pain and assessment for coronary artery disease (CAD) in appropriately selected patients. CAD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. There is extensive literature to support CCTA diagnostic and prognostic value both for stable and acute symptoms. It enables rapid and cost-effective rule-out of CAD, and permits quantification and characterization of coronary plaque and associated significance. In this comprehensive review, we detail the road traveled as CCTA evolved to include quantitative assessment of plaque stenosis and extent, characterization of plaque characteristics including high-risk features, functional assessment including fractional flow reserve-CT (FFR-CT), and CT perfusion techniques. The state of current guideline recommendations and clinical applications are reviewed, as well as future directions in the rapidly advancing field of CT technology, including photon counting and applications of artificial intelligence (AI). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances and Prospects in Cardiovascular Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>High-risk plaque features on coronary CT angiography (CAD RADS = 3 + HRP). HRP = High-risk plaque. (<b>A</b>) Positive remodeling seen in proximal left anterior descending artery (red bracket), with moderate (50–60%) underlying stenosis (2.5 mm luminal diameter shown with the yellow line). Outer caliber of artery is &gt;1.5 times the inner lumen; 7.0 mm total vessel diameter is shown with the red line, and the green lines with 4.6 mm measurements demonstrate the luminal diameter pre- and post-stenosis. (<b>B</b>) Low-attenuation lipid core (&lt;30 Hounsfield units, light blue arrow) with speckled calcium.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A 75-year-old outpatient with stable angina, with CT demonstrating moderate CAD without ischemia. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Coronary CT angiography demonstrated moderate coronary artery disease, stenosis 50% with mixed disease in the proximal and mid-left anterior descending artery, red arrows (CAD-RADS = 3). (<b>C</b>) FFR-CT negative for obstructive disease. Patient subsequently underwent stress echocardiography which was negative for inducible ischemia. He was commenced on aggressive risk factor modification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A 59-year-old male reviewed in the outpatient clinic with stable angina and multiple cardiovascular risk factors, found to have moderate CAD with ischemia. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Linear and curved multiplanar reconstructions on CCTA respectively demonstrate moderate stenosis in right coronary artery (RCA), red arrows, reported as 50–70% (CAD-RADS = 3). (<b>C</b>) FFR-CT positive for ischemia and suggesting obstructive coronary artery disease in right coronary artery. Patient was referred for invasive coronary angiography.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Nonobstructive coronary artery disease. A 67-year-old male with a history of hyperlipidemia presented with subacute atypical chest pain. CCTA excluded obstructive coronary artery disease. Curved multiplanar reconstruction demonstrates mild stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending artery (25–50% stenosis, red arrow) with myocardial bridging in the mid segment (yellow arrow). Patient was accordingly commenced on statin therapy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Obstructive coronary artery disease. A 79-year-old male presented to Emergency Room with two-week history of chest pain. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) CCTA demonstrated severe stenosis with mixed plaque in left anterior descending artery (CAD-RADS = 4) on axial imaging, red arrow, and 3D reconstruction, light blue arrow, respectively. (<b>C</b>) FFR-CT positive for ischemia with a value of 0.67. (<b>D</b>) Invasive coronary angiography confirmed severe obstructive disease, yellow arrow; patient proceeded to percutaneous coronary intervention.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Suggested algorithm for the approach to acute chest pain in the Emergency Room. * If no contraindication. # Can consider triple rule-out if PE or aortic dissection is suspected. Abbreviations: ACS = acute coronary syndrome, CCTA = cardiac computed tomography angiography, ECG = electrocardiogram, PE = pulmonary embolism.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 898 KiB  
Article
Interrater Variability of ML-Based CT-FFR in Patients without Obstructive CAD before TAVR: Influence of Image Quality, Coronary Artery Calcifications, and Location of Measurement
by Robin F. Gohmann, Adrian Schug, Christian Krieghoff, Patrick Seitz, Nicolas Majunke, Maria Buske, Fyn Kaiser, Sebastian Schaudt, Katharina Renatus, Steffen Desch, Sergey Leontyev, Thilo Noack, Philipp Kiefer, Konrad Pawelka, Christian Lücke, Ahmed Abdelhafez, Sebastian Ebel, Michael A. Borger, Holger Thiele, Christoph Panknin, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Matthias Horn and Matthias Gutberletadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5247; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175247 - 4 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1067
Abstract
Objectives: CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) can improve the specificity of coronary CT-angiography (cCTA) for ruling out relevant coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, little is known about the reproducibility of CT-FFR and the influence of [...] Read more.
Objectives: CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) can improve the specificity of coronary CT-angiography (cCTA) for ruling out relevant coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, little is known about the reproducibility of CT-FFR and the influence of diffuse coronary artery calcifications or segment location. The objective was to assess the reliability of machine-learning (ML)-based CT-FFR prior to TAVR in patients without obstructive CAD and to assess the influence of image quality, coronary artery calcium score (CAC), and the location of measurement within the coronary tree. Methods: Patients assessed for TAVR, without obstructive CAD on cCTA were evaluated with ML-based CT-FFR by two observers with differing experience. Differences in absolute values and categorization into hemodynamically relevant CAD (CT-FFR ≤ 0.80) were compared. Results in regard to CAD were also compared against invasive coronary angiography. The influence of segment location, image quality, and CAC was evaluated. Results: Of the screened patients, 109/388 patients did not have obstructive CAD on cCTA and were included. The median (interquartile range) difference of CT-FFR values was −0.005 (−0.09 to 0.04) (p = 0.47). Differences were smaller with high values. Recategorizations were more frequent in distal segments. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR between both observers was comparable (proximal: Δ0.2%; distal: Δ0.5%) but was lower in distal segments (proximal: 98.9%/99.1%; distal: 81.1%/81.6%). Image quality and CAC had no clinically relevant influence on CT-FFR. Conclusions: ML-based CT-FFR evaluation of proximal segments was more reliable. Distal segments with CT-FFR values close to the given threshold were prone to recategorization, even if absolute differences between observers were minimal and independent of image quality or CAC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagram of the 18-segment model of the coronary tree. Diagram showing the coronary tree with its division into 18 segments according to the SCCT guidelines [<a href="#B16-jcm-13-05247" class="html-bibr">16</a>]. Shaded segments were defined as proximal in this study. L = left; LAD = left anterior descending artery; PDA = posterior descending artery; PLB = posterior-lateral branch; R = right; RCA = right coronary artery; SCCT = Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>CT-FFR values at patient level. Bland-Altman plot showing the distribution of differences in CT-FFR values between both observers. Differences between both observers are overall very small. The plot shows no indication of a systematic bias. Lower mean CT-FFR values show one outlier (CT-FFR difference of −0.45 at a CT-FFR mean value of 0.58), which has been omitted from the plot for clarity. Lower mean CT-FFR values also show a larger heterogeneity of CT-FFR differences. CT-FFR = CT-derived fractional flow reserve. Dashed horizontal lines represent the mean difference (middle line) and the upper and lower limits of agreement (±1.96 SD, upper and lower lines).</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 940 KiB  
Article
Combined Computed Coronary Tomography Angiography and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Planning Computed Tomography Reliably Detects Relevant Coronary Artery Disease Pre-TAVI
by Dominik Felbel, Christoph Buck, Natalie Riedel, Michael Paukovitsch, Tilman Stephan, Marvin Krohn-Grimberghe, Johannes Mörike, Birgid Gonska, Christoph Panknin, Christopher Kloth, Meinrad Beer, Wolfgang Rottbauer and Dominik Buckert
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4885; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164885 - 19 Aug 2024
Viewed by 903
Abstract
Background: Before surgical or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), coronary status evaluation is required. The role of combined computed coronary tomography angiography (cCTA) and TAVI planning CT in this context is not yet well elucidated. This study assessed whether relevant proximal coronary disease [...] Read more.
Background: Before surgical or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), coronary status evaluation is required. The role of combined computed coronary tomography angiography (cCTA) and TAVI planning CT in this context is not yet well elucidated. This study assessed whether relevant proximal coronary disease requiring coronary revascularization can be safely detected by combined cCTA and TAVI planning CT, including CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) calculation in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Methods: This study analyzed patients with successful cCTA combined with TAVI planning CT using a 128-slice dual-source scanner. The detection via cCTA of relevant left main stem stenosis (>50%) or proximal coronary artery stenosis (>70%) was compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Results: This study comprised 101 consecutive TAVI patients with a median age of 83 [77–86] years, a median STS score of 3.7 [2.4–6.1] and 54% of whom had known coronary artery disease. Of 15 patients with relevant coronary stenoses, 14 (93.3%) were detected with cCTA, while false positive results were found in 25 patients. Only in patients with previous percutaneous coronary stent implantation (PCI) were false positive rates (11/29) increased. In the subgroup without previous PCI, an improved classification performance of 87.5%, being mainly due to 11.1% false positive classifications, led to a negative predictive value of 98.5%. Conclusions: Combined cCTA and CT-FFR with TAVI planning CT via state-of-the-art scanners and protocols as a one-stop shop can replace routine ICA in patients prior to TAVI due to its safe detection of relevant coronary artery stenosis, although diagnostic performance of cCTA is only reduced in patients with coronary stents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart of patient inclusion and stratification by the technical and clinical endpoint of 130 consecutive patients undergoing combined TAVI planning CT and coronary artery evaluation using cCTA and CT-FFR. Patients are stratified by the technical and the clinical endpoint. ICA was used as reference standard for correct or incorrect classification by cCTA. cCTA: computed coronary tomography angiography, CT-FFR: computed tomography derived functional flow reserve, ICA: invasive coronary angiography, TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Patient selection algorithm for coronary artery assessment in TAVI patients. CABG = coronary artery bypass graft, cCTA = computed coronary tomography angiography, CT-FFR = computed tomography derived functional flow reserve, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention, ICA = invasive coronary angiography, TAVI = transcatheter aortic valve implantation.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 3327 KiB  
Article
Intracoronary Imaging for Changing Therapeutic Decisions in Patients with Multivascular Coronary Artery Disease
by Dan Pasaroiu, Imre Benedek, Teodora Popa, Constantin Tolescu, Monica Chitu and Theodora Benedek
Medicina 2024, 60(8), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081320 - 15 Aug 2024
Viewed by 843
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Atherosclerotic disease is a major contributor to heart failure, stroke, and myocardial infarction, significantly lowering the quality of life and life expectancy and placing a significant burden on healthcare. Not all lesions deemed non-significant are benign, and conversely, not [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Atherosclerotic disease is a major contributor to heart failure, stroke, and myocardial infarction, significantly lowering the quality of life and life expectancy and placing a significant burden on healthcare. Not all lesions deemed non-significant are benign, and conversely, not all significant lesions are causative of ischemia. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) provides a functional assessment of coronary lesions, while optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers detailed imaging of plaque morphology, aiding in therapeutic decision-making. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of OCT and FFR as adjunctive tools in the catheterization laboratory for guiding therapeutic decisions in patients with multivessel disease for non-culprit vessels. Specifically, we aimed to assess how OCT and FFR influence therapeutic decision-making in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multivessel disease were randomized 1:1 into two groups: one guided by FFR alone and the other by a combination of FFR and OCT. For the FFR group, revascularization decisions for non-culprit lesions were based solely on FFR measurements. If the FFR was >0.8, the procedure was concluded, and the patient received maximal medical treatment. If the FFR was ≤0.8, a stent was placed. For the FFR + OCT group, if the FFR was >0.8, the revascularization decision was based on OCT findings. If there were no vulnerable plaques (VP), the procedure was concluded, and the patient received maximal medical treatment. If OCT imaging indicated VP, then the patient underwent revascularization. If the FFR was ≤0.8, the patient underwent revascularization regardless of OCT findings. Results: OCT imaging altered the therapeutic decision in 11 cases where FFR measurements were above 0.8, but the lesions were characterized as VP. Analyzing the total change in the decision to stent, 4 cases in the FFR group and 15 cases in the FFR and OCT groups (4 based on FFR and 11 on OCT) revealed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0006; Relative Risk = 0.2556; 95% CI: 0.1013 to 0.5603). When analyzing the change in the total decision both to stent and not to stent, we observed a statistically significant difference, with Group 1 having 7 cases and Group 2 having 15 cases (p = 0.0153; Relative Risk = 0.4050; 95% CI: 0.2004 to 0.7698. Conclusions: Based on the findings of this study, OCT significantly increases the percentage of stenting procedures by identifying vulnerable lesions. The use of intracoronary imaging facilitates the timely identification and treatment of these vulnerable lesions. This underscores the crucial role of OCT in enhancing the precision of coronary interventions by ensuring timely intervention for vulnerable lesions, thereby potentially improving patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Intracoronary assessment, imaging, and physiology for modifying therapeutic decisions. (<b>A</b>) Example of OCT image with plaque erosion with intraluminal thrombus (white arrow). (<b>B</b>) Example of an OCT image with plaque with a 0.05 mm fibrous cap thickness (white arrows). (<b>C</b>) Example of an OCT image with plaque rupture (white arrow). FFR recordings. (<b>D</b>) Example of negative FFR with a value of 1 (white arrow) with no indication for revascularization. (<b>E</b>) Example of a positive FFR with a value of 0.53 (white arrow) with an indication for revascularization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart exemplifying the study design. The study population consisted of patients admitted to the cardiology clinic with acute coronary syndrome who, following coronary angiography, were found to have multivessel coronary artery disease with at least one stenosis of 50% or more in a different vessel from the one responsible for the ACS. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In the FFR group, revascularization of non-culprit lesions was based on FFR analysis, while in the FFR and OCT groups, revascularization of non-culprit lesions was based on both FFR analysis and vulnerability features identified by OCT. In total, FFR analysis led to a change in the therapeutic decision in 7 cases in the FFR group, whereas FFR and OCT analysis led to a change in the therapeutic decision in 15 cases in the FFR and OCT groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Per-vessel analysis of the impact of intracoronary imaging on modified therapeutic decisions. (<b>A</b>) (left) Increase in revascularization decisions from 5 to 9 following FFR in lesions with first intention to PCI. (right) Decrease in revascularization decisions from 19 to 15 after performing FFR in lesions with the first intention not to PCI. (<b>B</b>) (left) Increase in revascularization decisions from 7 to 20 following OCT in lesions with first intention to PCI. (right) Decrease in revascularization decisions from 12 to 10 after performing FFR in lesions with the first intention not to PCI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Modified decision in favor of stenting based only on FFR in both groups (<b>left</b>). Modified decision in favor of stenting based on FFR and OCT (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Total change in the therapeutic decision following intracoronary imaging. Change in treatment strategy in 7 out of 18 cases in the FFR group (<b>left</b>) and in 15 out of 18 cases in the FFR and OCT groups (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 6137 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Severe Coronary Calcification on Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Analyses in People with Coronary Artery Disease
by Iva Žuža, Tin Nadarević, Tomislav Jakljević, Nina Bartolović and Slavica Kovačić
Diagnostics 2024, 14(16), 1738; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161738 - 10 Aug 2024
Viewed by 990
Abstract
Background: Negative CCTA can effectively exclude significant CAD, eliminating the need for further noninvasive or invasive testing. However, in the presence of severe CAD, the accuracy declines, thus necessitating additional testing. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of [...] Read more.
Background: Negative CCTA can effectively exclude significant CAD, eliminating the need for further noninvasive or invasive testing. However, in the presence of severe CAD, the accuracy declines, thus necessitating additional testing. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of noninvasive cFFR derived from CCTA, compared to ICA in detecting hemodynamically significant stenoses in participants with high CAC scores (>400). Methods: This study included 37 participants suspected of having CAD who underwent CCTA and ICA. CAC was calculated and cFFR analyses were performed using an on-site machine learning-based algorithm. Diagnostic accuracy parameters of CCTA and cFFR were calculated on a per-vessel level. Results: The median total CAC score was 870, with an IQR of 642–1370. Regarding CCTA, sensitivity and specificity for RCA were 60% and 67% with an AUC of 0.639; a LAD of 87% and 50% with an AUC of 0.688; an LCX of 33% and 90% with an AUC of 0.617, respectively. Regarding cFFR, sensitivity and specificity for RCA were 60% and 61% with an AUC of 0.606; a LAD of 75% and 54% with an AUC of 0.647; an LCX of 50% and 77% with an AUC of 0.647. No significant differences between AUCs of coronary CTA and cFFR for each vessel were found. Conclusions: Our results showed poor diagnostic accuracy of CCTA and cFFR in determining significant ischemia-related lesions in participants with high CAC scores when compared to ICA. Based on our results and study limitations we cannot exclude cFFR as a method for determining significant stenoses in people with high CAC. A key issue is accurate and detailed lumen segmentation based on good-quality CCTA images. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends and Advances in Cardiac Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of selected participants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>ROC curves of CCTA and cFFR for each coronary artery. RCA—right coronary artery, LAD—left anterior descending artery, LCX—left circumflex artery, AUC—area under the curve, CCTA—coronary computed tomography angiography, cFFR—one dimensional (1D) FFR analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An 80-year-old male with a CAC score of 868.5, exhibiting prominent calcifications in the LAD artery ((<b>A</b>)—arrow), underwent CCTA. The CCTA revealed severe stenosis in the mid-segment of the LAD artery ((<b>B</b>)—arrow, (<b>C</b>)—arrow). A cFFR test confirmed a significant stenosis in the same segment ((<b>D</b>)—arrow), with a cFFR value of less than 0.7. Consequently, ICA was performed, which confirmed 80% stenosis in the LAD ((<b>E</b>)—arrow). This was followed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting and the final angiography exam showed complete revascularization ((<b>F</b>)—arrow). CAC—coronary artery calcium, LAD—left anterior descending, CCTA—coronary computed tomographic angiography, cFFR—computed fractional flow reserve, ICA—invasive coronary angiography, PCI—percutaneous coronary intervention.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A 63-year-old male with a history of arterial hypertension and nonspecific arrhythmia underwent CCTA. The CAC score was 1406.7. Extensive calcified and mixed plaques were found in the RCA, with severe stenosis of up to 85% and in the RCA ((<b>A</b>)—arrow), and moderate stenosis of 65% in the LCX ((<b>B</b>)—arrow). A cFFR confirmed the significance of both lesions, with cFFR values of less than 0.7 in the RCA and 0.76 in the LCX ((<b>C</b>)—arrows). ICA revealed long 80–99% stenoses in the middle segment of the RCA ((<b>D</b>)—arrow) and a 90% stenosis in the proximal LCX ((<b>E</b>)—arrow). Immediate PCI of the RCA was performed with complete revascularization ((<b>F</b>)—arrow) which was complicated by anaphylactic shock. A few days later, after premedication, PCI of the LCX was performed with stent implantation and complete revascularization ((<b>G</b>)—arrow). CCTA—coronary computed tomographic angiography, CAC—coronary artery calcium, RCA—right coronary artery, LCX—left circumflex artery, cFFR—computed fractional flow reserve, ICA—invasive coronary angiography, PCI—percutaneous coronary intervention.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A 54-year-old male underwent CCTA for suspected ischemic heart disease. The CAC score was 417. Calcified plaques were found in both the RCA ((<b>A</b>)—arrows) and LAD ((<b>B</b>)—arrows) causing moderate stenoses (50–52% in the LAD and 63% in the proximal RCA). Image (<b>C</b>) shows a VRT reconstruction image of coronary arteries with multiple small plaques on LAD. A cFFR test showed no significant stenoses (<b>D</b>) which was subsequently confirmed on ICA (<b>E</b>). CCTA—coronary computed tomographic angiography, CAC—coronary artery calcium, RCA—right coronary artery, LAD—left anterior descending artery, VRT—volume rendering technique, cFFR—computed fractional flow reserve, ICA—invasive coronary angiography.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 1998 KiB  
Review
Clinical Updates in Coronary Artery Disease: A Comprehensive Review
by Andrea Bottardi, Guy F. A. Prado, Mattia Lunardi, Simone Fezzi, Gabriele Pesarini, Domenico Tavella, Roberto Scarsini and Flavio Ribichini
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4600; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164600 - 6 Aug 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3182
Abstract
Despite significant goals achieved in diagnosis and treatment in recent decades, coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a high mortality entity and continues to pose substantial challenges to healthcare systems globally. After the latest guidelines, novel data have emerged and have not been yet [...] Read more.
Despite significant goals achieved in diagnosis and treatment in recent decades, coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a high mortality entity and continues to pose substantial challenges to healthcare systems globally. After the latest guidelines, novel data have emerged and have not been yet considered for routine practice. The scope of this review is to go beyond the guidelines, providing insights into the most recent clinical updates in CAD, focusing on non-invasive diagnostic techniques, risk stratification, medical management and interventional therapies in the acute and stable scenarios. Highlighting and synthesizing the latest developments in these areas, this review aims to contribute to the understanding and management of CAD helping healthcare providers worldwide. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Angina Pectoris)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Appropriate test selection based on patient’s risk. Abbreviations: CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; CACS, coronary artery calcium score; CT-FFR, computed tomography-fractional flow reserve; CT-MPI, computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography; PET, positron emission tomography; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; ICA, invasive coronary angiography; PTP, pre-test probability; CAD, coronary artery disease.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Summary of the revascularization modalities for patients presenting with MI. Abbreviations: NSTEMI, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; MVD, multivessel disease; FFR, fractional flow reserve. * referred to COMPLETE trial. ** referred to SMILE trial.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>DAPT strategy in ACS patients to balance ischemic and bleeding risk [<a href="#B46-jcm-13-04600" class="html-bibr">46</a>]. Abbreviation: DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 3154 KiB  
Article
Hemodynamic Evaluation of Coronary Artery Lesions after Kawasaki Disease: Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve during Cardiac Catheterization with Myocardial Flow Reserve during 13N-Ammonia PET
by Makoto Watanabe, Ryuji Fukazawa, Tomonari Kiriyama, Shogo Imai, Ryosuke Matsui, Kanae Shimada, Yoshiaki Hashimoto, Koji Hashimoto, Masanori Abe, Mitsuhiro Kamisago and Yasuhiko Itoh
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(8), 229; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080229 - 23 Jul 2024
Viewed by 884
Abstract
Coronary artery lesions (CALs) after Kawasaki disease present complex coronary hemodynamics. We investigated the relationship between coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR), myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and myocardial blood flow volume fraction (MBF) and their clinical usefulness in CALs after Kawasaki disease. Nineteen patients [...] Read more.
Coronary artery lesions (CALs) after Kawasaki disease present complex coronary hemodynamics. We investigated the relationship between coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR), myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and myocardial blood flow volume fraction (MBF) and their clinical usefulness in CALs after Kawasaki disease. Nineteen patients (18 men, 1 woman) who underwent cardiac catheterization and 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography, with 24 coronary artery branches, were included. Five branches had inconsistent FFR and MFR values, two had normal FFR but abnormal MFR, and three had abnormal FFR and normal MFR. The abnormal MFR group had significantly higher MBF at rest than the normal group (0.86 ± 0.13 vs. 1.08 ± 0.09, p = 0.001). The abnormal FFR group had significantly lower MBF at adenosine loading than the normal group (2.23 ± 0.23 vs. 1.88 ± 0.29, p = 0.021). The three branches with abnormal FFR only had stenotic lesions, but the MFR may have been normal because blood was supplied by collateral vessels. Combining FFR, MFR, and MBF will enable a more accurate assessment of peripheral coronary circulation and stenotic lesions in CALs and help determine treatment strategy and timing of intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Burden of Comorbidities on Cardiovascular System and Beyond)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Adenosine-loaded 13N-ammonia PET examination protocol. The same protocol was used for both the resting and loading examinations except for the adenosine administration, and the interval between the resting and loading examinations was 4–5 half-lives. CT: computed tomography, PET: positron emission tomography.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Comparison of resting MBF in the normal and abnormal FFR groups. There was no significant difference in resting MBF between the normal and abnormal FFR groups. (<b>B</b>) Comparison of stress MBF in the normal and abnormal FFR groups. The abnormal FFR group had significantly lower stress MBF than the normal FFR group. FFR: coronary fractional flow reserve, MBF: myocardial blood flow volume fraction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) Comparison of resting MBF in the normal and abnormal MFR groups. The rest MBF was significantly higher in the abnormal MFR group than in the normal MFR group. (<b>B</b>) Comparison of stress MBF in the normal and abnormal MFR groups. There was no significant difference in stress MBF between the normal and abnormal MFR groups. MBF: myocardial blood flow volume fraction, MFR: myocardial flow reserve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) Coronary angiography image of Case T. (<b>B</b>) 13N-ammonia PET image of Case T. Owing to occlusion of the LAD and RCA, only LCX is responsible for coronary circulation. MFR may be low due to high blood flow at rest. LAD: left anterior descending artery, LCX: left circumflex artery, MFR: myocardial blood flow reserve, RCA: right coronary artery, PET: positron emission tomography.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Coronary angiography image of Case U. (<b>B</b>) 13N-ammonia PET image of Case U. The FFR was normal because of the giant aneurysm, and the MFR was low because the peripheral coronary arteries were already dilated at rest. FFR: coronary fractional flow reserve, MFR: myocardial flow reserve, PET: positron emission tomography.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Coronary angiography image of Case V. (<b>B</b>) 13N-ammonia PET image of Case V. The FFR was low due to the presence of a stenotic lesion, but it was thought the peripheral circulation was not impaired due to the collateral blood vessels. FFR: coronary fractional flow reserve; PET: positron emission tomography.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1032 KiB  
Article
Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve Utilization
by Marta Bujak, Krzysztof Malinowski, Zbigniew Siudak, Anna Ćmiel, Maciej Lesiak, Stanisław Bartuś, Jacek Legutko, Wojciech Wańha, Adam Witkowski, Dariusz Dudek, Mariusz Gąsior, Robert Gil, Marcin Protasiewicz, Jacek Kubica, Piotr Godek, Wojciech Wojakowski and Paweł Gąsior
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4028; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144028 - 10 Jul 2024
Viewed by 916
Abstract
Background: The literature review shows that female patients are more frequently underdiagnosed or suffer from delayed diagnosis. Recognition of sex-related differences is crucial for implementing strategies to improve cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to assess sex-related disparities in the frequency of fractional flow [...] Read more.
Background: The literature review shows that female patients are more frequently underdiagnosed or suffer from delayed diagnosis. Recognition of sex-related differences is crucial for implementing strategies to improve cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to assess sex-related disparities in the frequency of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided procedures in patients who underwent angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We have derived the data from the national registry of percutaneous coronary interventions and retrospectively analyzed the data of more than 1.4 million angiography and/or PCI procedures [1,454,121 patients (62.54% men and 37.46% women)] between 2014 and 2022. The logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore whether female sex was associated with FFR utilization. Results: The FFR was performed in 61,305 (4.22%) patients and more frequently in men than women (4.15% vs. 3.45%, p < 0.001). FFR was more frequently assessed in females with acute coronary syndrome than males (27.75% vs. 26.08%, p < 0.001); however, women with chronic coronary syndrome had FFR performed less often than men (72.25% vs. 73.92%, p < 0.001). Females with FFR-guided procedures were older than men (69.07 (±8.87) vs. 65.45 (±9.38) p < 0.001); however. less often had a history of myocardial infarction (MI) (24.79% vs. 36.73%, p < 0.001), CABG (1.62% vs. 2.55%, p < 0.005) or PCI (36.6% vs. 24.79%, p < 0.001) compared to men. Crude comparison has shown that male sex was associated with a higher frequency of FFR assessment (OR = 1.2152–1.2361, p < 0.005). Conclusions: Despite a substantial rise in FFR utilization, adoption in women remains lower than in men. Female sex was found to be an independent negative predictor of FFR use. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Temporal changes and differences in the number of FFR-guided procedures between men and women in years 2014–2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Independent factors associated with FFR utilization–multivariable analysis.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 655 KiB  
Article
Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on the Coronary Revascularization Guided by Intracoronary Physiology: Results of the First Registry with Long-Term Follow-Up in a Latin American Population
by Clarissa Campo Dall’Orto, Rubens Pierry Ferreira Lopes, Lara Vilela Eurípedes, Gilvan Vilella Pinto Filho and Marcos Raphael da Silva
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(7), 216; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11070216 - 10 Jul 2024
Viewed by 831
Abstract
The use of invasive physiology methods in patients with renal dysfunction is not well elucidated. Our objective was to evaluate the in-hospital and long-term results of using intracoronary physiology to guide revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease. In this retrospective study, we [...] Read more.
The use of invasive physiology methods in patients with renal dysfunction is not well elucidated. Our objective was to evaluate the in-hospital and long-term results of using intracoronary physiology to guide revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 151 patients from January 2018 to January 2022, divided into 2 groups: CKD (81 patients [114 lesions]) and non-CKD (70 patients [117 lesions]). The mean age was higher (p < 0.001), body mass index was lower (p = 0.007), contrast volume used was lower (p = 0.02) and the number of ischemic lesions/patients was higher (p = 0.005) in the CKD group. The primary outcomes (rate of major adverse cardiac events during follow-up, defined as death, infarction, and need for new revascularization) in the CKD and non-CKD groups were 22.07% and 14.92%, respectively (p = 0.363). There was a significant difference in the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate (11.68%, CKD group vs. 1.49%, non-CKD group, p = 0.02), this initial statistical difference was not significant after adjusting for variables in the logistic regression model. There was no difference between the rates of death from all causes (6.49%, CKD group vs. 1.49%, non-CKD group, p = 0.15), reinfarction (3.89%, CKD group vs. 1.49%, non-CKD group, p = 0.394), and need for new revascularization (11.68%, CKD group vs. 5.97%, non-CKD group, p = 0.297). As there was no difference in the endpoints between groups with long-term follow-up, this study demonstrated the safety of using intracoronary physiology to guide revascularization in patients with CKD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Enrollment and lesion treatment strategies. Invasive physiology was calculated for the lesions in coronary arteries with 40–80% stenosis. If the iFR/RFR value was &lt;0.89 alone or between 0.86–0.93, followed by FFR &lt; 0.80, then the patient was referred for revascularization and remained under optimal clinical treatment (referred lesions). If the iFR/RFR value was outside the described range, then the patient remained under optimal clinical treatment and was not subjected to any revascularization strategy (deferred lesions). FFR, fractional flow reserve; iFR, instantaneous wave-free ratio; RFR, resting full-cycle ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Kaplan–Meier curves for survival-free target lesion revascularization rate (<b>A</b>), major adverse cardiac events (<b>B</b>) and all-cause mortality (<b>C</b>). CKD, chronic kidney disease; MACE, major adverse cardiac event; TLR, target lesion revascularization.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop