Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (60)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = flexitarian

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 4934 KiB  
Article
Rheological and Gelling Properties of Chicken-Mushroom Hybrid Gel for Flexitarian-Friendly Functional Food Applications
by Ngassa Julius Mussa, Manat Chaijan, Porntip Thongkam, Chantira Wongnen, Warangkana Kitpipit, Hasene Keskin Çavdar, Siriporn Riebroy Kim and Worawan Panpipat
Foods 2025, 14(4), 645; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14040645 - 14 Feb 2025
Abstract
Hybrid gels combining chicken and mushroom offer innovative functional food choices, catering to the growing demand for flexitarian-friendly products. These gels reduce meat content while enhancing dietary fiber, bioactive compounds, and sustainability. This study examined the effects of split gill mushroom (Schizophyllum [...] Read more.
Hybrid gels combining chicken and mushroom offer innovative functional food choices, catering to the growing demand for flexitarian-friendly products. These gels reduce meat content while enhancing dietary fiber, bioactive compounds, and sustainability. This study examined the effects of split gill mushroom (Schizophyllum commune) powder (SGM) substitution (0%, 25%, 50%, and 75%, w/w) for Ligor chicken meat in hybrid gels, focusing on rheological and gelling properties. The 25% SGM gel demonstrated optimal performance in terms of rheology, texture, microstructure, pH, water-holding capacity, and color. At this level, hybrid gels exhibited superior gelation properties, demonstrating elasticity dominance, as indicated by a higher storage modulus (G′) than loss modulus (G″), along with stable cohesiveness and unaffected springiness (p > 0.05). However, hardness, gumminess, and chewiness were significantly lower than the control (p < 0.05). Higher SGM levels (50–75%) markedly weakened the gels, reducing viscoelasticity, increasing porosity and water release, and causing discoloration. These findings highlight 25% SGM as an optimal level for hybrid meat gels, maintaining product quality while promoting sustainability in the meat industry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Healthier Meat and Meat Products)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Whole fresh split gill mushroom (<span class="html-italic">Schizophyllum commune</span>) (SGM) (<b>a</b>), freshly prepared SGM (<b>b</b>), dried SGM (<b>c</b>), and SGM powder (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Visual representation of chicken-mushroom hybrid sols with varying levels of spilt gill mushroom (<span class="html-italic">Schizophyllum commune</span>) (SGM) powder substitution before thermal gelation: (<b>a</b>) Control sample (0% SGM); (<b>b</b>) 25% SGM substitution; (<b>c</b>) 50% SGM substitution; and (<b>d</b>) 75% SGM substitution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dynamic rheological properties of chicken meat-mushroom hybrid sols with varying levels of spilt gill mushroom (<span class="html-italic">Schizophyllum commune</span>) powder (SGM) substitution (0%, 25%, 50%, and 75%), monitored during heating from 22 °C to 90 °C: (<b>a</b>) Storage modulus (G′) showing the elastic behavior of the gel; (<b>b</b>) Loss modulus (G″) representing viscous properties; and (<b>c</b>) Loss tangent (tan δ = G″/G′) indicating the viscoelastic balance of the gel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of chicken meat-mushroom hybrid gels substituted with spilt gill mushroom (<span class="html-italic">Schizophyllum commune</span>) (SGM) powder at the level of 0% (Control; (<b>a</b>), 25% (<b>b</b>), 50% (<b>c</b>), and 75% (<b>d</b>)) based on the total weight of the meat sample. Magnification: 10,000×, EHT: 5 kV. Highly porous structure with larger voids, indicating a disrupted gel matrix and reduced gel strength.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of chicken meat-mushroom hybrid gels substituted with spilt gill mushroom (<span class="html-italic">Schizophyllum commune</span>) (SGM) powder at the level of 0% (Control; (<b>a</b>), 25% (<b>b</b>), 50% (<b>c</b>), and 75% (<b>d</b>)) based on the total weight of the meat sample. Magnification: 10,000×, EHT: 5 kV. Highly porous structure with larger voids, indicating a disrupted gel matrix and reduced gel strength.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 1896 KiB  
Article
Consumer Expectations for Cream Cheese: A Category Appraisal Study in the United Kingdom with Dairy and Plant-Based Variants in Various Flavours
by Sara R. Jaeger, Sok L. Chheang and Joachim J. Schouteten
Foods 2025, 14(3), 445; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030445 - 29 Jan 2025
Abstract
The purpose of the present research was to deliver new knowledge of consumer expectations for plant-based (PB) alternatives to cream cheese (PBCCA) by conducting a category appraisal study. Around 1100 consumers from the United Kingdom (UK) who followed omnivore and flexitarian diets participated [...] Read more.
The purpose of the present research was to deliver new knowledge of consumer expectations for plant-based (PB) alternatives to cream cheese (PBCCA) by conducting a category appraisal study. Around 1100 consumers from the United Kingdom (UK) who followed omnivore and flexitarian diets participated in an online survey. They evaluated 13 written stimuli presented as product names encompassing dairy cream cheese and PBCCAs in different flavours (original/natural, garlic/herb, salmon, strawberry, chocolate) and different product formulations (low-fat, lactose-free). A multi-response approach was used that obtained sensory, emotional, conceptual, and versatility product evaluations. The research findings, which matched predictions, showed: (1) negative product expectations for PBCCAs replicated across flavour variants, providing evidence of a systematic PB effect relative to cream cheese; (2) sensory and non-sensory drivers of expected product liking resembled those established for the cream cheese category with actual product experience; (3) sensory and non-sensory drivers of expected product versatility strongly resembled those of expected product liking; (4) groups of consumers existed with different preferences, including flavour and product type preferences (dairy, PBCCA); and (5) negative product expectations for PBCCAs translated to a stated behavioural preference for cream cheese over PBCCA, and dairy-based samples were chosen over their PB counterparts regardless of flavour. The category appraisal approach confirmed the systematic negative appeal of PBCCAs relative to their dairy counterparts. This was in line with findings from past research on other PB alternative foods and invites a rethinking of the appeal of this class of products to participants in this research, who represent a large segment of UK consumers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensory and Consumer Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Results for EF1. Two-dimensional solutions (Dim 1 (83.9%) and Dim 2 (13.6%)) following Correspondence Analysis based on expected emotional associations to 13 cream cheese product stimuli included in research. (<b>A</b>) Product space with 95% confidence ellipses around average sample positions. (<b>B</b>) Variable space with 95% confidence ellipses around average variable positions. Sample abbreviations: Orig = cream cheese, original/plain flavour; Orig_LowFat = cream cheese, original/plain flavour, low-fat; Orig_PB_AO = cream cheese, original/plain flavour, plant-based alternative (almonds and oats); G&amp;H = cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour; G&amp;H_LowFat: cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour, low-fat; G&amp;H_PB_AO: cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour, plant-based alternative (almonds and oats); Orig_PB_COC: cream cheese, original plain flavour, plant-based alternative (coconut oil); Orig_LactFr: cream cheese, original/plain flavour, lactose-free; G&amp;H_LactFr: cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour, lactose-free; Strawb: cream cheese, strawberry flavour; Strawb_PB_AO: cream cheese, strawberry flavour, plant-based alternative (almonds and oats); MlkChoc: cream cheese, milk chocolate flavour; Salmon: Cream cheese, salmon flavour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>Results for EF1. Two-dimensional solutions (Dim 1 (83.9%) and Dim 2 (13.6%)) following Correspondence Analysis based on expected emotional associations to 13 cream cheese product stimuli included in research. (<b>A</b>) Product space with 95% confidence ellipses around average sample positions. (<b>B</b>) Variable space with 95% confidence ellipses around average variable positions. Sample abbreviations: Orig = cream cheese, original/plain flavour; Orig_LowFat = cream cheese, original/plain flavour, low-fat; Orig_PB_AO = cream cheese, original/plain flavour, plant-based alternative (almonds and oats); G&amp;H = cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour; G&amp;H_LowFat: cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour, low-fat; G&amp;H_PB_AO: cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour, plant-based alternative (almonds and oats); Orig_PB_COC: cream cheese, original plain flavour, plant-based alternative (coconut oil); Orig_LactFr: cream cheese, original/plain flavour, lactose-free; G&amp;H_LactFr: cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour, lactose-free; Strawb: cream cheese, strawberry flavour; Strawb_PB_AO: cream cheese, strawberry flavour, plant-based alternative (almonds and oats); MlkChoc: cream cheese, milk chocolate flavour; Salmon: Cream cheese, salmon flavour.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Results for EF1. Two-dimensional solutions (Dim 1 (54.8%) and Dim 2 (35.3%)) following Correspondence Analysis based on expected sensory, emotional, and conceptual associations to six stimuli in cream cheese product subset. (<b>A</b>) Biplot showing samples and terms (sensory, emotional, and conceptual). <a href="#app1-foods-14-00445" class="html-app">Supplementary Materials Part SM8</a> contains plot with all terms clearly labelled. (<b>B</b>) Variable space with 95% confidence ellipses around average variable positions. Sample abbreviations: Orig = cream cheese, original/plain flavour; Orig_LowFat = cream cheese, original/plain flavour, low-fat; Orig_PB_AO = cream cheese, original/plain flavour, plant-based alternative (almonds and oats); G&amp;H = cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour; G&amp;H_LowFat: cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour, low-fat; G&amp;H_PB_AO: cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour, plant-based alternative (almonds and oats).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Results for EF1. Two-dimensional solutions (Dim 1 (54.8%) and Dim 2 (35.3%)) following Correspondence Analysis based on expected sensory, emotional, and conceptual associations to six stimuli in cream cheese product subset. (<b>A</b>) Biplot showing samples and terms (sensory, emotional, and conceptual). <a href="#app1-foods-14-00445" class="html-app">Supplementary Materials Part SM8</a> contains plot with all terms clearly labelled. (<b>B</b>) Variable space with 95% confidence ellipses around average variable positions. Sample abbreviations: Orig = cream cheese, original/plain flavour; Orig_LowFat = cream cheese, original/plain flavour, low-fat; Orig_PB_AO = cream cheese, original/plain flavour, plant-based alternative (almonds and oats); G&amp;H = cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour; G&amp;H_LowFat: cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour, low-fat; G&amp;H_PB_AO: cream cheese, garlic and herbs flavour, plant-based alternative (almonds and oats).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results for EF3. Scatterplot of = mean impact on expected liking and expected versatility following penalty/lift analysis performed on six-sample cream cheese subset using all 50 sensory, emotional, and conceptual descriptors.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 1070 KiB  
Review
Hybrid and Plant-Based Burgers: Trends, Challenges, and Physicochemical and Sensory Qualities
by Ziane da Conceição das Mercês, Natalia Maldaner Salvadori, Sabrina Melo Evangelista, Tatiana Barbieri Cochlar, Alessandro de Oliveira Rios and Viviani Ruffo de Oliveira
Foods 2024, 13(23), 3855; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13233855 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1072
Abstract
Burgers have become a staple of global cuisine and can have several different versions and combinations. For example, hybrid burgers have a percentage of animal protein in their formulation, while plant-based burgers contain 100% plant-based proteins. Therefore, the aim of this study was [...] Read more.
Burgers have become a staple of global cuisine and can have several different versions and combinations. For example, hybrid burgers have a percentage of animal protein in their formulation, while plant-based burgers contain 100% plant-based proteins. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the emerging trends and challenges in the formulation of hybrid and plant-based burgers, with an emphasis on new ingredients and the evaluation of their physical, chemical, and sensory properties. An integrative literature review on alternative burgers to meat ones was carried out, focusing on hybrid products (meat + plant-based) and fully plant-based burgers. The studies analyzed show that plant-based and hybrid burgers can be developed with different protein sources, such as soybeans, white beans, textured peas, pseudocereals, and cashew nuts, with good nutritional and sensory characteristics. While hybrid burgers combine meat and plant-based proteins to reduce saturated fats, plant-based burgers show equal promise, with a high protein and fiber content, a lower fat content, and good sensory acceptance. However, despite the market potential of these products, there are challenges to be overcome, among which are their texture and flavor, which are essential characteristics of animal-meat burgers. Another point to take into account is the diversity of preferences among consumers with different beliefs or eating styles: vegans, for example, do not prefer a product that is very similar to meat, unlike flexitarians, who seek products which are similar to animal meat in all attributes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Foods)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the scientific dataset. Source: Study data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relevant factors in new product development. Source: Authorship by the authors.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 1360 KiB  
Article
Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Physicians and Nurses in Spain Toward Vegan Diets
by Nuria Trujillo-Garrido, Eduardo Sánchez-Sánchez and María J. Santi-Cano
Nutrients 2024, 16(23), 3992; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16233992 - 21 Nov 2024
Viewed by 997
Abstract
Background: As dietary habits shift in response to environmental concerns and health awareness, understanding healthcare professionals’ perceptions of vegan diets is crucial. Objectives: This study aimed to identify the beliefs and attitudes of primary care doctors and nurses in Spain towards vegan diets. [...] Read more.
Background: As dietary habits shift in response to environmental concerns and health awareness, understanding healthcare professionals’ perceptions of vegan diets is crucial. Objectives: This study aimed to identify the beliefs and attitudes of primary care doctors and nurses in Spain towards vegan diets. Methods: A questionnaire-based, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted among 208 healthcare professionals. Results: 87% of participants followed an omnivorous diet, while only 3.4% identified as lacto-ovo-vegetarian (LOV) or vegan. Statistically significant differences were observed by sex, with women more likely to agree that livestock farming contributes to global warming (27.3% and 28.0% vs. 17.0% and 12.8%, respectively; p = 0.02). Additionally, women were more inclined to consider vegan diets suitable for vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women and children, when adequately supplemented (24.8% and 17.4% vs. 10.6% and 10.6%, respectively; p = 0.030). Healthcare professionals who followed a LOV or vegan diet were more likely to disagree with the notion that vegan diets do not provide the necessary macronutrients and micronutrients compared to omnivores (strongly disagree 19.9%, 56.3%, 85.7%; p = 0.001 for omnivores, flexitarians, and LOVs/vegans, respectively). Conclusions: Current nutrition training may not meet the needs of doctors and nurses. Furthermore, it is implied that some professionals’ attitudes towards vegan diets may be more influenced by personal beliefs than by scientific literature. These findings can inform future clinical guidelines and support a more evidence-based approach to dietary counselling for vegan populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Sustainable Healthy Diets)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Aggregated responses by gender. Chi-squared test. Q1 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.190; Q2 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.005; Q3 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.019; Q4 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.562; Q5 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.330; Q6 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.448; Q7 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.968; Q8 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.387; Q9 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.402; Q10 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.918.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Aggregated responses by training. Chi-squared test. Q1 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.782; Q2 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.402; Q3 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.782; Q4 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.316; Q5 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.836; Q6 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.633; Q7 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.068; Q8 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.496; Q9 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.849; Q10 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.482.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Aggregated responses by dietary habits. Chi-squared test. Q1 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.134; Q2 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.017; Q3 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.040; Q4 <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; Q5 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.371; Q6 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.453; Q7 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.095; Q8 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.175; Q9 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.357; Q10 <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.482.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 315 KiB  
Article
Young Flexitarians: An Insight into Barriers and Facilitators Related to Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation for Meat Reduction
by Andreja Vezovnik and Tanja Kamin
Sustainability 2024, 16(20), 9027; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209027 - 18 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1252
Abstract
In recent decades, meat consumption has faced growing scrutiny from an environmental, health, and animal welfare perspective. As a result, reducing meat consumption has emerged as an important strategy to mitigate its negative effects. Flexitarians, a growing group of meat reducers, have attracted [...] Read more.
In recent decades, meat consumption has faced growing scrutiny from an environmental, health, and animal welfare perspective. As a result, reducing meat consumption has emerged as an important strategy to mitigate its negative effects. Flexitarians, a growing group of meat reducers, have attracted attention for potentially shaping future dietary trends. This study uses a qualitative approach and draws on 15 in-depth interviews with young flexitarians in Slovenia (YFS) to identify the main facilitators and barriers to meat reduction by exploring their motivations, capabilities, and opportunities as described in the COM-B behavioral model. This study fills the gap in studies on flexitarians using the COM-B model by looking at capabilities and opportunities, not solely motives. In addition, it fills the gap in qualitative in-depth studies on all three COM-B categories, as well as a gap in studies conducted outside northwest Europe and other primarily western geographical contexts. This study highlights important findings for the central and eastern European context that industry and governments should consider when developing behavior change strategies for healthy, sustainable diets. This study shows that strong rural family ties and limited access to meat alternatives are the major barriers to meat reduction in Slovenia. The YFS preferred whole, unprocessed foods (legumes, vegetables, grains) over processed meat alternatives and reduced their meat consumption primarily for health and environmental reasons, relying on social support from peers and information from popular documentaries and social media influencers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Food)
15 pages, 275 KiB  
Article
A Qualitative Study of Rural Plant-Based Eaters’ Knowledge and Practices for Nutritional Adequacy
by Michelle Leonetti, Jane Kolodinsky, Amy Trubek and Emily H. Belarmino
Nutrients 2024, 16(20), 3504; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16203504 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1432
Abstract
(1) Background: Healthful plant-based diets, especially those rich in minimally processed plant-based foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, have been associated with a lower risk of diet-related chronic disease. However, individuals who limit or avoid animal products may be at risk [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Healthful plant-based diets, especially those rich in minimally processed plant-based foods such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, have been associated with a lower risk of diet-related chronic disease. However, individuals who limit or avoid animal products may be at risk of nutrient deficiencies, especially related to Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acids, calcium, iron, iodine, zinc, and protein. Such deficiencies can result in both short- and long-term health challenges. We used qualitative methods to explore plant-based eaters’ knowledge and awareness of these eight nutrients of concern in diets that limit or exclude animal-source foods. (2) Methods: We conducted interviews with 28 rural flexitarian, pescatarian, vegan, or vegetarian adults in Vermont, USA. (3) Results: The participants positively viewed the healthfulness of plant-based diets, but many recognized limitations to accessing Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, and omega-3 fatty acids. They shared the strategies used to meet their needs including eating a varied diet, seeking out specific foods, and taking dietary supplements. Analyses identified gaps in the participants’ knowledge related to nutrient bioavailability, food sources of specific nutrients, and the importance of zinc and iodine. Vegans—the highest-risk group—generally presented as the most knowledgeable. The participants noted a lack of local plant-based nutrition expertise. (4) Conclusions: Addressing the identified knowledge gaps and challenges to dietary adequacy, especially among those who limit, but do not fully omit, animal-source foods, may support plant-based nutrition. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
19 pages, 309 KiB  
Article
Changing Our Food Habits One Bite at a Time: Exploring Young Flexitarians in a Country with a High Meat Intake
by Tanja Kamin, Andreja Vezovnik and Irena Bolko
Foods 2024, 13(20), 3215; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13203215 - 10 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1588
Abstract
Flexitarian diets have gained attention for their potential positive impact on human health and greenhouse gas emissions reduction. However, a critical question remains: Can the segment of flexitarians significantly contribute to necessary changes in our current unsustainable food systems? Our study addresses this [...] Read more.
Flexitarian diets have gained attention for their potential positive impact on human health and greenhouse gas emissions reduction. However, a critical question remains: Can the segment of flexitarians significantly contribute to necessary changes in our current unsustainable food systems? Our study addresses this gap by examining meat consumption habits among young adults (n = 1023) in a country with traditionally high meat intake. Furthermore, we focus on a subset of flexitarians (n = 286). Our findings reveal two distinct groups of flexitarians: ethical (n1 = 140) and utilitarian (n2 = 148). Utilitarian flexitarians exhibit a stronger preference for meat (t(284)= −15.180, p < 0.001), greater food neophobia (t(284) = −4.785, p < 0.001), and lower environmental awareness (t(284) = 7.486, p < 0.001) compared to Ethical flexitarians. The Ethical group, predominantly female (χ2(1) = 13.366, p < 0.001), demonstrates higher life satisfaction (t(284) = 5.485, p < 0.001), better health perceptions (t(284) = 5.127, p < 0.001), and stronger beliefs in reducing meat consumption (t(284) = −8.968, p < 0.001). Additionally, Ethical flexitarians hold more positive views on plant-based meat, perceiving it as healthier (t(284) = 4.326, p < 0.001) and more ethical (t(284) = 4.942, p < 0.001), and show a greater willingness to adopt it (t(284) = 7.623, p < 0.001). While both groups possess similar knowledge and willingness regarding cultured meat and insects, Ethical flexitarians view cultured meat more favourably (t(250.976) = 2.964, p = 0.003). Our study provides insights into the evolving trends of flexitarianism within Central and Eastern European countries, where research on meat consumption and flexitarianism is scarce. These insights hold value for promoting behaviour change toward reduced meat consumption for both health and environmental reasons. Additionally, they offer guidance to the food industry, including producers, sellers, and providers of meals in educational and employment facilities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Food Security and Sustainability)
16 pages, 1143 KiB  
Article
New Perspectives on the Old Uses of Traditional Medicinal and Edible Herbs: Extract and Spent Material of Persicaria hydropiper (L.) Delarbre
by Marina Jovanović, Jovana Vunduk, Dragana Mitić-Ćulafić, Emilija Svirčev, Petar Vojvodić, Nina Tomić, Laksmi Nurul Ismi and Dina Tenji
Nutrients 2024, 16(19), 3368; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16193368 - 3 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1255
Abstract
Background/Objectives:Persicaria hydropiper (L.) Delarbre, commonly known as water pepper, possesses multifunctional potential. Our research focuses on its complex phenolic composition, bioactivity, safety evaluation and utilization in a sustainable manner. Moreover, a survey was conducted among the Serbian population to gain insight into [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives:Persicaria hydropiper (L.) Delarbre, commonly known as water pepper, possesses multifunctional potential. Our research focuses on its complex phenolic composition, bioactivity, safety evaluation and utilization in a sustainable manner. Moreover, a survey was conducted among the Serbian population to gain insight into the attitude towards traditional wild-growing herbs (i.e., P. hydropiper), the level of familiarity with their zero-waste culture, and to assess eating behaviors. Methods: A survey was conducted with 168 participants to assess attitudes towards traditional herbs, zero-waste culture, and eating behaviors, while cytotoxicity, in vivo toxicity, chemical analysis of secondary metabolites, and probiotic viability assays were performed to evaluate the effects of the PH extract. Results: Notably, P. hydropiper extract (PH) exhibits a diverse phenolic profile, including quinic acid (3.68 ± 0.37 mg/g DW), gallic acid (1.16 ± 0.10 mg/g DW), quercetin (2.34 ± 0.70 mg/g DW) and kaempferol-3-O-glucoside (4.18 ± 0.17 mg/g DW). These bioactive compounds have been linked to anticancer effects. The tested extract demonstrated a cytotoxic effect on the human neuroblastoma cell line, opening questions for the further exploration of its mechanisms for potential therapeutic applications. Based on the toxicity assessment in the Artemia salina model, the PH could be characterized with good safety, especially for the lower concentrations (LC50 = 0.83 mg/mL, 24 h). The utilization of the spent PH material supports the viability of psychobiotic strains (up to 9.26 ± 0.54 log CFU/mL). Based on the conducted survey, 63.7% (n = 107) of respondents mainly prefer traditional instead of imported herbs. The respondents were skeptical about zero-waste edibles; 51.2% (n = 86) would not try them, and a bit more than half were not familiar with zero-waste culture (57.7%; n = 97). Only 8.3% (n = 14) followed a flexitarian diet as a dietary pattern. Conclusions: The use of underutilized traditional plants and their spent material could potentially contribute to the acceptance of a zero-waste culture in Serbia. Reinventing the use of neglected traditional plants and addressing ways for spent material valorization could contribute to the acceptance of a zero-waste strategy and encourage healthier eating behavior. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Optimal Diets)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Inhibition rates of SH-SY5Y cells treated with PH after 24h; C-cell growth control. * A significant difference in means between all samples and C-control according to the Dunnett tests (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Assessment of PH cytotoxicity in vitro using human embryonic fibroblast MRC-5 cells. <sup>#</sup>* significant difference between samples and GC (growth control) according to the Dunnett test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05); <sup>#</sup> increased cell viability; * decreased cell viability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Assessment of PH toxicity in vitro in brine shrimps model. * A significant difference in means between samples according to HSD test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 1699 KiB  
Review
Bioactive Compounds from Spirulina spp.—Nutritional Value, Extraction, and Application in Food Industry
by Blaženko Marjanović, Maja Benković, Tamara Jurina, Tea Sokač Cvetnić, Davor Valinger, Jasenka Gajdoš Kljusurić and Ana Jurinjak Tušek
Separations 2024, 11(9), 257; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11090257 - 30 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4605
Abstract
The surging popularity of plant-based diets and the growing emphasis on clean-label products have intensified interest in Spirulina within the food industry. As more people adopt vegetarian, vegan, or flexitarian lifestyles, demand for plant-based protein sources has escalated. Spirulina’s high protein content [...] Read more.
The surging popularity of plant-based diets and the growing emphasis on clean-label products have intensified interest in Spirulina within the food industry. As more people adopt vegetarian, vegan, or flexitarian lifestyles, demand for plant-based protein sources has escalated. Spirulina’s high protein content and complete amino acid profile make it an ideal candidate to meet this demand. However, incorporating Spirulina into food products is not without its challenges. Its strong, earthy, or fishy taste can be off-putting to consumers and difficult to mask in food formulations. Furthermore, isolating Spirulina’s bioactive compounds while preserving their integrity is complex, especially considering the heat sensitivity of many of these components. Traditional extraction methods often employ high temperatures, which can degrade these valuable compounds. Consequently, there is a growing preference for non-thermal extraction techniques. This paper provides an overview of recent advancements in Spirulina cultivation, bioactive extraction, and their application in food products. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The average amounts of the most important groups of nutrients in <span class="html-italic">Spirulina</span>. (<b>b</b>) Differences in nutrient status among the various species of <span class="html-italic">Spirulina</span>, including <span class="html-italic">Spirulina platensis</span>, <span class="html-italic">Spirulina maxima</span>, <span class="html-italic">Spirulina pacifica</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Spirulina fusiformis</span> [<a href="#B7-separations-11-00257" class="html-bibr">7</a>,<a href="#B37-separations-11-00257" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B56-separations-11-00257" class="html-bibr">56</a>,<a href="#B57-separations-11-00257" class="html-bibr">57</a>,<a href="#B58-separations-11-00257" class="html-bibr">58</a>,<a href="#B59-separations-11-00257" class="html-bibr">59</a>,<a href="#B60-separations-11-00257" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-separations-11-00257" class="html-bibr">61</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Advantages of using the most-used non-thermal extraction methods for extracting the bioactive form of <span class="html-italic">Spirulina</span>.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 1055 KiB  
Review
Olfactory and Gustatory Perception among Plant-Based vs. Omnivorous Dieters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Yunfan Mo, Stephanie C. McLeod, Jessica C. McCormack, Sze Ying Leong, Tamlin S. Conner, Indrawati Oey and Mei Peng
Sustainability 2024, 16(14), 6241; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146241 - 22 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1636
Abstract
Driven by heightened awareness of environmental sustainability, personal health, and animal welfare, there has been a rapid surge in adoption of plant-based diets (PBDs) by global consumers. Despite the important implications of potential links between PBDs and chemosensory (e.g., olfactory and gustatory) perception, [...] Read more.
Driven by heightened awareness of environmental sustainability, personal health, and animal welfare, there has been a rapid surge in adoption of plant-based diets (PBDs) by global consumers. Despite the important implications of potential links between PBDs and chemosensory (e.g., olfactory and gustatory) perception, the empirical evidence has yet to be comprehensively reviewed. This systematic review aims to synthesise existing data comparing olfactory and gustatory perceptions among individuals following plant-based (including vegan, vegetarian, and flexitarian) and omnivorous diets. Seven databases produced 1038 publications for screening against the pre-registered criteria. Eleven studies were included in this review, with three focusing on olfaction and eight on gustation. Of these, three gustatory studies provided sufficient data for meta-analysis, revealing little difference between plant-based and omnivore dieters on an overall level. The PBD group exhibited a significantly lower threshold (i.e., higher sensitivity) to sweetness compared to the omnivore group (ES = −0.336, 95% CI between −0.630 and −0.042, p < 0.05). Additionally, olfactory studies indicated that PBD followers perceived meat-related odours to be less pleasant compared to omnivores. Overall, this review points to a sensory–diet relationship, highlighting the potential role of sensory perception in sustainable plant-based dietary behaviours. The findings also encourage food manufacturers to consider potential chemosensory alterations among plant-based consumers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Health, Well-Being and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PRISMA flow diagram of the selection process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Forest plot of taste threshold measure between plant-based and omnivorous groups [<a href="#B50-sustainability-16-06241" class="html-bibr">50</a>,<a href="#B52-sustainability-16-06241" class="html-bibr">52</a>,<a href="#B55-sustainability-16-06241" class="html-bibr">55</a>]. Each square shows the effect size of a study and its 95% CI. The size of the squares indicates the weight of each study. The diamond represents the overall effect size and 95% CI.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 1085 KiB  
Article
Development and Characterization of Hybrid Burgers Made from Pork and Multi-Ingredient Plant Mixtures and Protected with Lactic Acid Bacteria
by Krzysztof Dasiewicz, Iwona Szymanska, Dominika Opat and Elzbieta Hac-Szymanczuk
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(14), 6272; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146272 - 18 Jul 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 818
Abstract
Hybrid (meat–plant) products can be a sustainable response to the increased interest in flexitarianism. Their development requires designing appropriate composition and functional properties and ensuring microbiological safety. This study aimed to determine the influence of using various multi-ingredient plant mixtures and pork in [...] Read more.
Hybrid (meat–plant) products can be a sustainable response to the increased interest in flexitarianism. Their development requires designing appropriate composition and functional properties and ensuring microbiological safety. This study aimed to determine the influence of using various multi-ingredient plant mixtures and pork in different proportions and two recipe variants on the characteristics of baked burgers. Additionally, the impact of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) application on the microbiological quality of raw hybrid/plant burgers was assessed. All products were analyzed in terms of basic chemical composition (NIR spectroscopy) and physicochemical and textural properties (instrumental methods). The raw plant and hybrid burgers met the microbiological requirements. The baked burgers did not significantly differ in terms of their chemical composition, except for the fiber found in plant/hybrid samples. Moreover, the reformulation of burgers had no effect on their cooking yield or water activity. As the content of plant parts increased, the baked burgers were darker (lower L*) and had a more tender texture (lower shear force and penetration force). Overall, the multi-ingredient plant mixtures showed great potential in the development of high-quality hybrid burgers. However, the texture formed can, importantly, determine final consumer acceptance. Therefore, research should be continued, especially in terms of comprehensive textural and sensory analyses. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Browning Index of the surface of meat, hybrid, and plant burgers. For the denomination of hybrid burger samples, see <a href="#applsci-14-06272-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>. Different lowercase letters above columns for the same recipe variant indicate significant differences (grouping variable: sample type) (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). Different uppercase letters above columns for the same sample type indicate significant differences (grouping variable: recipe variant) (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Shear force (<b>a</b>) and penetration force (<b>b</b>) of meat, hybrid, and plant burgers. For the denomination of hybrid burger samples, see <a href="#applsci-14-06272-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>. Different lowercase letters above columns for the same recipe variant indicate significant differences (grouping variable: sample type) (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). Different uppercase letters above columns for the same sample type indicate significant differences (grouping variable: recipe variant) (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2011 KiB  
Article
Dietary Habits and Race Day Strategies among Flexitarian, Vegetarian, and Vegan Recreational Endurance Runners: A Cross-Sectional Investigation from The NURMI Study (Step 2)
by Derrick R. Tanous, Mohamad Motevalli, Claus Leitzmann, Gerold Wirnitzer, Thomas Rosemann, Beat Knechtle and Katharina Wirnitzer
Nutrients 2024, 16(11), 1647; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111647 - 27 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1499
Abstract
Many of today’s recreational runners have changed their diet from omnivorous to vegetarian or vegan for reasons like better sport performance, animal ethics, positive health, eco-aspects, or male infertility. Others have constructed the flexitarian diet due to current trends in sustainable eating. The [...] Read more.
Many of today’s recreational runners have changed their diet from omnivorous to vegetarian or vegan for reasons like better sport performance, animal ethics, positive health, eco-aspects, or male infertility. Others have constructed the flexitarian diet due to current trends in sustainable eating. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the dietary habits and race day strategies of recreational endurance runners following current sustainable dietary trends. Recreational endurance runners (18+ years) were invited to complete the standardized online survey on socio-demography/anthropometry, motivations, running/racing history, food frequency, and race day dietary strategy. Chi-squared tests and Wilcoxon tests were used for the statistical analysis. In total, 289 participants submitted the survey; 146 subjects following flexitarian (n = 34), vegetarian (n = 50), or vegan (n = 62) diets were included in the final sample. Significant differences were found across the diet types: BMI (p = 0.018), fruit/vegetable consumption (p < 0.001), and the dietary motive of performance (p = 0.045). The findings suggest that the flexitarian diet may be appropriate for health- and environmentally conscious populations living in a meat-centered society and lacking social support to eat completely vegetarian/vegan. Following a plant-based diet is perceived as easy for health-conscious, athletic populations, and the vegan diet does not require a particularly effortful/complex race day strategy for endurance runners. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Enrolment in the study flowchart, including dietary categories. BMI—body mass index. HM—half-marathon; M—marathon; 10 KM—10 km.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Food frequency consumption across diet-type subgroups displayed by forest plot with 95% confidence interval.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Body weight fluctuations across dietary subgroups: diet vs. training.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Box plots of race day macronutrient intake by dietary subgroups (flexitarian, vegetarian, vegan).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2613 KiB  
Article
Assessing Performance of Contemporary Plant-Based Diets against the UK Dietary Guidelines: Findings from the Feeding the Future (FEED) Study
by Izabella Lawson, Caroline Wood, Nandana Syam, Holly Rippin, Selina Dagless, Kremlin Wickramasinghe, Birdem Amoutzopoulos, Toni Steer, Timothy J. Key and Keren Papier
Nutrients 2024, 16(9), 1336; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16091336 - 29 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4564
Abstract
Uncertainty remains about the composition of contemporary plant-based diets and whether they provide recommended nutrient intakes. We established Feeding the Future (FEED), an up-to-date online cohort of UK adults following different plant-based diets and diets containing meat and fish. We recruited 6342 participants [...] Read more.
Uncertainty remains about the composition of contemporary plant-based diets and whether they provide recommended nutrient intakes. We established Feeding the Future (FEED), an up-to-date online cohort of UK adults following different plant-based diets and diets containing meat and fish. We recruited 6342 participants aged 18–99 [omnivores (1562), flexitarians (1349), pescatarians (568), vegetarians (1292), and vegans (1571)] between February 2022 and December 2023, and measured diet using a food frequency questionnaire and free text. We compared personal characteristics and dietary intakes between diet groups and assessed compliance with dietary guidelines. Most participants met UK dietary recommendations for fruit and vegetables, sodium, and protein, although protein intakes were lowest among vegetarians and vegans. Omnivores did not meet the fibre recommendation and only vegans met the saturated fat recommendation. All diet groups exceeded the free sugars recommendation. Higher proportions of vegetarians and vegans were below the estimated average requirements (EARs) for zinc, iodine, selenium, and, in vegans, vitamins A and B12, whereas calcium intakes were similar across the diet groups. People following plant-based diets showed good compliance with most dietary targets, and their risk for inadequate intakes of certain nutrients might be mitigated by improved dietary choices and/or food fortification. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition Methodology & Assessment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Mean body mass index (BMI) by age and diet group. Exclusions: 304 participants with missing values for height and weight, 100 participants who preferred not to state their gender.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Daily dietary intakes in relation to UK dietary guidelines. Diet groups: O = omnivores, F = flexitarians, P = pescatarians, V = vegetarians, Ve = vegans; Black squares represent mean daily intakes and black lines represent standard errors; Reference lines represent the UK dietary recommendations for adults and reference nutrient intake (RNI) values for protein (green line = min, orange line = max).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Daily micronutrient intakes in relation to UK Reference Nutrient Intakes (RNIs). Diet groups: O = omnivores, F = flexitarians, P = pescatarians, V = vegetarians, Ve = vegans; black squares represent mean daily intakes and black lines represent standard errors; intakes of vitamin A, iron, selenium, and zinc are presented separately by women (grey circles, grey standard error lines) and men (black squares, black standard error lines); reference lines represent the UK RNI for adults (green line) and sex-specific RNI targets for women (pink line) and men (blue line).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 1932 KiB  
Article
Effects of Different Nutritional Patterns and Physical Activity on Body Composition: A Gender and Age Group Comparative Study
by Mauro Lombardo, Alessandra Feraco, Elisabetta Camajani, Stefania Gorini, Rocky Strollo, Andrea Armani, Elvira Padua and Massimiliano Caprio
Foods 2024, 13(4), 529; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13040529 - 8 Feb 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3036
Abstract
This cross-sectional study analyses differences in dietary habits, taste preferences, variety of protein sources and body composition (BC) profiles among individuals following omnivorous, flexitarian, lacto-ovo-vegetarian and pescatarian diets. Furthermore, it assesses the correlations between these dietary patterns and various sports, classified by exercise [...] Read more.
This cross-sectional study analyses differences in dietary habits, taste preferences, variety of protein sources and body composition (BC) profiles among individuals following omnivorous, flexitarian, lacto-ovo-vegetarian and pescatarian diets. Furthermore, it assesses the correlations between these dietary patterns and various sports, classified by exercise intensity, in relation to BC parameters. The study analysed the eating habits and BC data of 1342 participants aged 18–65 years, classified into four diet groups based on their 7-day food diaries and questionnaire responses. Our analysis revealed gender- and age-related differences in weekly food consumption and protein source variety, with men generally consuming more meat, processed meat and fish than women, especially in younger age groups. Differences in dairy and soy consumption were also noted between age groups, while legume and soy preferences showed no gender disparity across all ages. Among non-sporting individuals, vegetarians exhibited lower fat mass (FM%) compared to other diets, while among athletes, vegetarians and pescatarians in in endurance and strength sports, respectively, displayed lower FM%, with flexitarians and omnivores in endurance sports showing higher FM%. Non-athletic omnivores and vegetarians demonstrated a greater proportion of body protein, while among athletes, those engaged in strength training exhibited a higher body protein content across all dietary groups compared to those in endurance training. Among non-athletic groups, vegetarians exhibited the lowest FM/FFM (fat mass/fat-free mass) ratio, while among athletes, vegetarians in endurance sports and participants in strength training across other diets showed lower FM/FFM ratios. The results emphasise the complex interaction between diet, BC and lifestyle choices, revealing how different combinations of diet and sport are associated with optimised BC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Choice, Nutrition, and Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dietary Patterns and Gender Disparity in Protein Source Diversity. The bar graph represents the mean number of different protein sources consumed on a weekly basis, segmented by diet type (Flexitarian, Omnivorous, Pescatarian, Vegetarian) and gender (males in light blue, females in light red). Error bars indicate standard deviation from the mean. Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The dietary intake information was self-reported and categorized according to the predominant dietary patterns. ‘M’ denotes males and ‘F’ represents females. Independent <span class="html-italic">t</span>-tests were conducted to compare the mean number of protein sources between genders within each dietary category, resulting in non-significant <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values. An ANOVA was performed to compare the mean number of protein sources across the four dietary patterns, yielding a highly significant <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value (&lt;0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Consumption Patterns of Food Items Across Different Diets. This heatmap shows the percentage of affirmative (‘Yes’) responses for the consumption of various food items across four diet types. Data presented reflect the proportion of participants who reported consuming each food item, with percentages calculated based on affirmative responses. Dietary adjustments were applied prior to analysis: for Pescatarians and Vegetarians, meat and processed meat consumption was set to zero; for Vegetarians, fish consumption was also set to zero. Chi-squared tests for independence were performed to evaluate the significance of differences in consumption across diet types. Significant differences were found for cow’s milk (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001), vegetable drinks (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001), fresh cheeses (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001), meat (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001), red meat (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001), processed meat (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001), fish (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001), eggs (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001) and tofu (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001). No significant differences were observed for low-fat white yogurt (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.104), legumes (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.855), cooked vegetables (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.482), raw vegetables (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.290), fruits (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.826), cereals (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.557), whole grains (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.211), nuts (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.228) and dark chocolate (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.770).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dietary Preferences by Gender: A Comparative Analysis Across Diets. This heatmap illustrates the percentage-point differences in affirmative response rates to various food items between males and females across four dietary patterns: Flexitarian, Omnivorous, Pescatarian, and Vegetarian. Statistical significance was assessed using two-proportion z-tests for each food item across diets. <span class="html-italic">p</span> values: Cow’s milk: 0.95; Vegetable drinks (e.g., soy milk): 0.126; Low-fat white yogurt: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.951; Fresh cheeses: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.91; Meat: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.0002; Red Meat: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.002; Processed Meat (e.g., prosciutto): <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.0004; Fish: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.562; Eggs: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.009 Legumes: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.921; Cooked vegetables: <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.00001; Raw vegetables: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.1326; Fruits: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.9423; Cereals (e.g., spelt, barley): <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.8124 Whole grains: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.0009; Nuts: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.326; Tofu: <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.58; Dark chocolate (at least 70%): <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.1233.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Associations Between Dietary Patterns, Athletic Engagement, and Body Composition Metrics. This heatmap illustrates the impact of various diets and sports activities on body composition, specifically focusing on averages of FM percentage (FM%), body protein content, and FM/FFM ratio. Differences across dietary (Flexitarian, Omnivorous, Pescatarian, Vegetarian) and sport (endurance, skill, strength training, team, no sport) categories are highlighted, with colour gradients representing the magnitude of each metric. The normality of data was tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test, revealing a mix of normal and non-normal distributions across different groupings. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Significant differences across groups were found—FM% (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001), FM/FFM Ratio (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001) and Body Protein (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.0016).</p>
Full article ">
2 pages, 167 KiB  
Abstract
Development and Testing of a Short Scale to Estimate the Importance of Economic, Social and Environmental Sustainability of Fermented Plant-Based Foods
by Jean-Paul C. Garin, Federico J. A. Perez-Cueto and Inês Magalhães
Proceedings 2023, 91(1), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091295 - 7 Feb 2024
Viewed by 691
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The social and economic attitudinal dimensions of sustainability are difficult to estimate and are often overlooked in consumer research. To date, few scales can be used to assess in a combined manner the importance given by consumers to social, economic [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The social and economic attitudinal dimensions of sustainability are difficult to estimate and are often overlooked in consumer research. To date, few scales can be used to assess in a combined manner the importance given by consumers to social, economic and environmental sustainability. In the frame of the EU-funded HealthFerm Project, a scale to estimate the relative importance of three dimensions of sustainability was necessary. Therefore, the objective was to develop and test a short scale that would englobe all the keywords that are present in the definition of sustainable development and that would assess the importance of each dimension in the eyes of consumers. Methods: A test-retest reliability study with a sample of volunteers (n = 15) who agreed to fill out the questionnaires twice. Cronbach’s alpha was used to evaluate internal consistency. A paired samples t-test was used to evaluate the repeatability of the scale. Results: Of the 15 respondents, seven were women (46.7%); the mean age was 23.5 years (s.d.: 2.4); 66.7% lived in an urban area and 33.3% in a suburban area; 53.3% had a higher education; 46.7% of the sample described their economic situation as neither easy nor difficult. Regarding their diet, 26.7% were flexitarian, 66.7% omnivore and 6.7% pescetarian. There was no difference (paired samples t-test; p-value > 0.05) between the two time points, indicating that the scale is reliable. Furthermore, the scale showed very good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.98). Conclusion: The short scale can be used to evaluate how important the different dimensions of sustainability of fermented plant-based foods are to consumers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023)
Back to TopTop