Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = drilling and anchoring robot

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 7134 KiB  
Article
Research on Obstacle-Avoidance Trajectory Planning for Drill and Anchor Materials Handling by a Mechanical Arm on a Coal Mine Drilling and Anchoring Robot
by Siya Sun, Sirui Mao, Xusheng Xue, Chuanwei Wang, Hongwei Ma, Yifeng Guo, Haining Yuan and Hao Su
Sensors 2024, 24(21), 6866; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24216866 - 25 Oct 2024
Viewed by 731
Abstract
At present, China’s coal mine permanent tunneling support commonly uses mechanized drilling and anchoring equipment; there are low support efficiency, labor intensity, and other issues. In order to further improve the support efficiency and liberate productivity, this paper further researches the trajectory planning [...] Read more.
At present, China’s coal mine permanent tunneling support commonly uses mechanized drilling and anchoring equipment; there are low support efficiency, labor intensity, and other issues. In order to further improve the support efficiency and liberate productivity, this paper further researches the trajectory planning of the drilling and anchoring materials of the robotic arm for the drilling machine “grasping–carrying–loading–unloading” on the basis of the drilling and anchoring robotic system designed by the team in the previous stage. Firstly, the kinematic model of the robotic arm with material was established by improving the D-H parameter method. Then, the working space of the robotic arm with the material was analyzed using the Monte Carlo method. The singular bit-shaped region of the robotic arm was restricted, and obstacles were removed from the working space. The inverse kinematics was utilized to solve the feasible domain of the robotic arm with material. Secondly, in order to avoid blind searching, the guidance of the Bi-RRT algorithm was improved by adding the target guidance factor, and the two-way tree connection strategy for determining the feasible domain was combined with the Bi-RRT algorithm’s feasible domain judgment bi-directional tree connection strategy to improve the convergence speed of the Bi-RRT algorithm. Then, in order to adapt to the dynamic environment and avoid the global planning algorithm from falling into the local minima, on the basis of the above planning methods, an improved Bi-RRT trajectory planning algorithm incorporating the artificial potential field was proposed, which takes the planned paths as the guiding potential field of the artificial potential field to make full use of the global information and avoid falling into the local minimization. Finally, a simulation environment was built in a ROS environment to compare and analyze the planning effect of different algorithms. The simulation results showed that the improved Bi-RRT trajectory planning algorithm incorporating the artificial potential field improved the optimization speed by 69.8% and shortened the trajectory length by 46.6% compared with the traditional RRT algorithm. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Structure of anchor drilling robot system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overall structure of anchor drilling robot arm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of a mechanical arm with material.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Coordinate diagram of connecting rod of the cooperative manipulator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Drawing of connecting rod coordinate system of conveyor arm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simplified model of obstacles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Collision of connecting rod with obstacle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The collision between rods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Different singular bit patterns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Feasible domain of the robotic arm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Connection Judgment Strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Goal Oriented Strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Trajectory simplification strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Add Target Points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Based on the flow chart of the fusion algorithm of improved artificial potential field and Bi-RRT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Improved artificial potential field simulation diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Different algorithm planning effect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Grabbing the drilling rods and loading them into the drilling rig.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Remove the drill rod from the drilling rig and bring it back to the material depot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Clamping and loading of medical rolls into top plate drill holes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Grabbing anchor rods for loading into the drilling rig.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 12301 KiB  
Article
High-Precision Drilling by Anchor-Drilling Robot Based on Hybrid Visual Servo Control in Coal Mine
by Mengyu Lei, Xuhui Zhang, Wenjuan Yang, Jicheng Wan, Zheng Dong, Chao Zhang and Guangming Zhang
Mathematics 2024, 12(13), 2059; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12132059 - 1 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1021
Abstract
Rock bolting is a commonly used method for stabilizing the surrounding rock in coal-mine roadways. It involves installing rock bolts after drilling, which penetrate unstable rock layers, binding loose rocks together, enhancing the stability of the surrounding rock, and controlling its deformation. Although [...] Read more.
Rock bolting is a commonly used method for stabilizing the surrounding rock in coal-mine roadways. It involves installing rock bolts after drilling, which penetrate unstable rock layers, binding loose rocks together, enhancing the stability of the surrounding rock, and controlling its deformation. Although recent progress in drilling and anchoring equipment has significantly enhanced the efficiency of roof support in coal mines and improved safety measures, how to deal with drilling rigs’ misalignment with the through-hole center remains a big issue, which may potentially compromise the quality of drilling and consequently affect the effectiveness of bolt support or even result in failure. To address this challenge, this article presents a robotic teleoperation system alongside a hybrid visual servo control strategy. Addressing the demand for high precision and efficiency in aligning the drilling rigs with the center of the drilling hole, a hybrid control strategy is introduced combining position-based and image-based visual servo control. The former facilitates an effective approach to the target area, while the latter ensures high-precision alignment with the center of the drilling hole. The robot teleoperation system employs the binocular vision measurement system to accurately determine the position and orientation of the drilling-hole center, which serves as the designated target position for the drilling rig. Leveraging the displacement and angle sensor information installed on each joint of the manipulator, the system utilizes the kinematic model of the manipulator to compute the spatial position of the end-effector. It dynamically adjusts the spatial pose of the end-effector in real time, aligning it with the target position relative to its current location. Additionally, it utilizes monocular vision information to fine-tune the movement speed and direction of the end-effector, ensuring rapid and precise alignment with the target drilling-hole center. Experimental results demonstrate that this method can control the maximum alignment error within 7 mm, significantly enhancing the alignment accuracy compared to manual control. Compared with the manual control method, the average error of this method is reduced by 41.2%, and the average duration is reduced by 4.3 s. This study paves a new path for high-precision drilling and anchoring of tunnel roofs, thereby improving the quality and efficiency of roof support while mitigating the challenges associated with significant errors and compromised safety during manual control processes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The current main process for rock bolt support.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Structural diagram of an anchor-drilling robot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Structure of hybrid visual servo control method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic diagram of the manipulator and joint coordinates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Binocular vision positioning model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Experimental platform for visual positioning of drilling hole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Positioning results of the drilling-hole center based on different methods. (<b>a</b>) Positioning results along the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis based on different methods; (<b>b</b>) positioning results along the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis based on different methods; (<b>c</b>) positioning results along the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis based on different methods; (<b>d</b>) the distance between the position results of the drilling-hole center obtained by different methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Verification results of the proposed method for the alignment between the drilling rig and drilling hole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The time consumption and the position error between the proposed method and the manual operation.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 7819 KiB  
Article
Research on the Deviation Correction Control of a Tracked Drilling and Anchoring Robot in a Tunnel Environment
by Chuanwei Wang, Hongwei Ma, Xusheng Xue, Qinghua Mao, Jinquan Song, Rongquan Wang and Qi Liu
Actuators 2024, 13(6), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/act13060221 - 13 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 916
Abstract
In response to the challenges of multiple personnel, heavy support tasks, and high labor intensity in coal mine tunnel drilling and anchoring operations, this study proposes a novel tracked drilling and anchoring robot. The robot is required to maintain alignment with the centerline [...] Read more.
In response to the challenges of multiple personnel, heavy support tasks, and high labor intensity in coal mine tunnel drilling and anchoring operations, this study proposes a novel tracked drilling and anchoring robot. The robot is required to maintain alignment with the centerline of the tunnel during operation. However, owing to the effects of skidding and slipping between the track mechanism and the floor, the precise control of a drilling and anchoring robot in tunnel environments is difficult to achieve. Through an analysis of the body and track mechanisms of the drilling and anchoring robot, a kinematic model reflecting the pose, steering radius, steering curvature, and angular velocity of the drive wheel of the drilling and anchoring robot was established. This facilitated the determination of speed control requirements for the track mechanism under varying driving conditions. Mathematical models were developed to describe the relationships between a tracked drilling and anchoring robot and several key factors in tunnel environments, including the minimum steering space required by the robot, the minimum relative steering radius, the steering angle, and the lateral distance to the sidewalls. Based on these models, deviation-correction control strategies were formulated for the robot, and deviation-correction path planning was completed. In addition, a PID motion controller was developed for the robot, and trajectory-tracking control simulation experiments were conducted. The experimental results indicate that the tracked drilling and anchoring robot achieves precise control of trajectory tracking, with a tracking error of less than 0.004 m in the x-direction from the tunnel centerline and less than 0.001 m in the y-direction. Considering the influence of skidding, the deviation correction control performance test experiments of the tracked drilling and anchoring robot at dy = 0.5 m away from the tunnel centerline were completed. In the experiments, the tracked drilling and anchoring robot exhibited a significant difference in speed between the two sides of the tracks with a track skid rate of 0.22. Although the real-time tracking maximum error in the y-direction from the tunnel centerline was 0.13 m, the final error was 0.003 m, meeting the requirements for position deviation control of the drilling and anchoring robot in tunnel environments. These research findings provide a theoretical basis and technical support for the intelligent control of tracked mobile devices in coal mine tunnels, with significant theoretical and engineering implications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Robots: Design, Control and Application—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Composition of drilling and anchoring robot. 1. Left track mechanism, 2. main frame, 3. right track mechanism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The 3D model of the track mechanism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The geometric configuration of the tracked drilling and anchoring robot’s differential drive system in the xy plane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The relationship curve between the robot’s steering curvature <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>κ</mi> </semantics></math>, velocity <span class="html-italic">v</span>, and the speeds of the left track <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">L</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and right track <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">L</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 0, 10, 20, 30).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The relationship graph between the robot’s turning radius <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ρ</mi> </semantics></math>, driving speed <span class="html-italic">v</span>, slippage ratio <span class="html-italic">i</span>, and the speeds of the left track <span class="html-italic">v<sub>L</sub></span> and right track <span class="html-italic">v<sub>R</sub></span>: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">i</span> = 0, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">i</span> = 0.3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>The relationship graph between the robot’s turning radius <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ρ</mi> </semantics></math>, driving speed <span class="html-italic">v</span>, slippage ratio <span class="html-italic">i</span>, and the speeds of the left track <span class="html-italic">v<sub>L</sub></span> and right track <span class="html-italic">v<sub>R</sub></span>: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">i</span> = 0, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">i</span> = 0.3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Analysis of the steering space drilling and anchoring robot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Relationship between the maximum steering angle of the robot and the distance to the sidewall: (<b>a</b>) analysis graph of robot steering capability, (<b>b</b>) robot steering angle <span class="html-italic">θ</span> vs. sidewall distance <span class="html-italic">Y<sub>R</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Relationship between robot steering angle and distances from points <span class="html-italic">A</span>, <span class="html-italic">B</span>, <span class="html-italic">C</span>, and <span class="html-italic">D</span> to the sidewall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Path planning for robot correction in a tunnel environment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The robot path tracking PID kinematic controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Block diagram of the robot control system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Simulink simulation model of the robot path tracking control system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Robot path tracking control simulation under different PID parameters: (<b>a</b>) path tracking simulation under different PID parameters; (<b>b</b>) x-y path tracking error under different PID parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Path tracking control simulation of the robot PID {0.1, 0.01, 0}: (<b>a</b>) path tracking simulation (<span class="html-italic">dy</span> = 0.1), (<b>b</b>) x-y path tracking error (<span class="html-italic">dy</span> = 0.1), (<b>c</b>) path tracking simulation ((<span class="html-italic">dy</span> = 0.5), (<b>d</b>) x-y path tracking error ((<span class="html-italic">dy</span> = 0.5).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Drilling and anchoring robot test platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Curve plot of robot steering correction control: (<b>a</b>) drive wheel speed curve, (<b>b</b>) displacement curve, (<b>c</b>) real-time error y-direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Schematic diagram of the installation position of the ultrasonic sensors (1 ultrasonic sensor <span class="html-italic">US<sub>R</sub></span><sub>1</sub>, 2 ultrasonic sensor <span class="html-italic">US<sub>R</sub></span><sub>2</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Curves of the displacement variation of the four corner points of the drilling and anchoring robot. (<b>a</b>) A, B, C, and D real-time displacement curves; (<b>b</b>) curves of the distance variation between points A, B, C, D and the sidewall.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 21072 KiB  
Article
Research on the Anchor-Rod Recognition and Positioning Method of a Coal-Mine Roadway Based on Image Enhancement and Multiattention Mechanism Fusion-Improved YOLOv7 Model
by Xusheng Xue, Jianing Yue, Xingyun Yang, Qinghua Mao, Yihan Qin, Enqiao Zhang and Chuanwei Wang
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 1703; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051703 - 20 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1038
Abstract
A drill-anchor robot is an essential means of efficient drilling and anchoring in coal-mine roadways. It is significant to calculate the position of the drill-anchor robot based on the positioning information of the supported anchor rod to improve tunneling efficiency. Therefore, identifying and [...] Read more.
A drill-anchor robot is an essential means of efficient drilling and anchoring in coal-mine roadways. It is significant to calculate the position of the drill-anchor robot based on the positioning information of the supported anchor rod to improve tunneling efficiency. Therefore, identifying and positioning the supported anchor rod has become a critical problem that needs to be solved urgently. Aiming at the problem that the target in the image is blurred and cannot be accurately identified due to the low and uneven illumination environment, we proposed an improved YOLOv7 (the seventh version of the You Only Look Once) model based on the fusion of image enhancement and multiattention mechanism, and the self-made dataset is used for testing and training. Aiming at the problem that the traditional positioning method cannot guarantee accuracy and efficiency simultaneously, an anchor-rod positioning method using depth image and RGB image alignment combined with least squares linear fitting is proposed, and the positioning accuracy is improved by processing the depth map. The results show that the improved model improves the mAP by 5.7% compared with YOLOv7 and can accurately identify the target. Through the positioning method proposed in this paper, the error between the positioning coordinate and the measurement coordinate of the target point on each axis does not exceed 11 mm, which has high positioning accuracy and improves the positioning accuracy and robustness of the anchor rod in the coal-mine roadway. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Principle of the anchor-rod identification and positioning method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>YOLOv7 + CLAHE + BiFormer + CBAM fusion model structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>CLAHE algorithm flow chart. The red circle in the figure shows the part before and after the algorithm processing as a comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>BiFormer attention mechanism structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>CBAM structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Part of the supported anchor-rod dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Multivision sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Coordinate transformation relationship.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Depth map alignment effect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Depth map denoising effect. The black box in the figure is ROI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Positioning model diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Coal-mine roadway simulation experiment environment and platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Experimental principle and flow chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of experimental results. (<b>a</b>) YOLOv7. (<b>b</b>) CLAHE + YOLOv7. (<b>c</b>) CLAHE + CBAM + YOLOv7. (<b>d</b>) CLAHE + BiFormer + YOLOv7. (<b>e</b>) CLAHE + BiFormer + CBAM + YOLOv7.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) Network detection effect. (<b>b</b>) Depth rendering after denoising the positioning experimental verification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Fitting straight-line diagram. (<b>a</b>) The first row of anchor rods. (<b>b</b>) The second row of anchor rods. (<b>c</b>) The third row of anchor rods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Coordinate error curve.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 6087 KiB  
Article
Locating Anchor Drilling Holes Based on Binocular Vision in Coal Mine Roadways
by Mengyu Lei, Xuhui Zhang, Zheng Dong, Jicheng Wan, Chao Zhang and Guangming Zhang
Mathematics 2023, 11(20), 4365; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11204365 - 20 Oct 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 1325
Abstract
The implementation of roof bolt support within a coal mine roadway has the capacity to bolster the stability of the encompassing rock strata and thereby mitigate the potential for accidents. To enhance the automation of support operations, this paper introduces a binocular vision [...] Read more.
The implementation of roof bolt support within a coal mine roadway has the capacity to bolster the stability of the encompassing rock strata and thereby mitigate the potential for accidents. To enhance the automation of support operations, this paper introduces a binocular vision positioning method for drilling holes, which relies on the adaptive adjustment of parameters. Through the establishment of a predictive model, the correlation between the radius of the target circular hole in the image and the shooting distance is ascertained. Based on the structural model of the anchor drilling robot and the related sensing data, the shooting distance range is defined. Exploiting the geometric constraints inherent to adjacent anchor holes, the precise identification of anchor holes is detected by a Hough transformer with an adaptive parameter-adjusted method. On this basis, the matching of the anchor hole contour is realized by using linear slope and geometric constraints, and the spatial coordinates of the anchor hole center in the camera coordinate system are determined based on the binocular vision positioning principle. The outcomes of the experiments reveal that the method attains a positioning accuracy of 95.2%, with an absolute error of around 1.52 mm. When compared with manual operation, this technique distinctly enhances drilling accuracy and augments support efficiency. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Anchor drilling robot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Algorithm flowchart for extracting the three-dimensional (3D) spatial information of a drilling hole center using binocular vision system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Image pairs before stereo rectify.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Image pairs after stereo rectify.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Example of image segmentation: (<b>a</b>) original image; (<b>b</b>) preprocessing image; (<b>c</b>) Canny-detected image; and (<b>d</b>) straight line and region of interest (ROI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Variation in the radius with distance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Model of binocular camera.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Simulation experiment of identifying and locating the drilling holes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Contour fitting of the drilling hole: (<b>a</b>) based on Hough circle detection; (<b>b</b>) based on the proposed method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The variation in spatial coordinates of the same drilling hole every 100 mm interval.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 9820 KiB  
Article
Improved Rapid-Expanding-Random-Tree-Based Trajectory Planning on Drill ARM of Anchor Drilling Robots
by Xuhui Zhang, Mengyao Huang, Mengyu Lei, Hao Tian, Xin Chen and Chenhui Tian
Machines 2023, 11(9), 858; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11090858 - 27 Aug 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1451
Abstract
Permanent highway support in deep coal mines now depends on the anchor drilling robot’s drill arm. The drilling arm’s trajectory planning using the conventional RRT (rapid-expanding random tree) algorithm is inefficient and has crooked, rough paths. To improve the accuracy of path planning, [...] Read more.
Permanent highway support in deep coal mines now depends on the anchor drilling robot’s drill arm. The drilling arm’s trajectory planning using the conventional RRT (rapid-expanding random tree) algorithm is inefficient and has crooked, rough paths. To improve the accuracy of path planning, we propose an improved RRT algorithm. Firstly, the kinematic model of the drill arm of the drill and anchor robot was established, and the improved DH solution parameters and the positive solution of the drill arm kinematics were solved. The end effector’s attainable working space was calculated using the Monte Carlo approach. Additionally, to address the problem of the slow running speed of the RRT algorithm, an artificial potential field factor was introduced to construct virtual force fields at obstacle and target points and calculate the potential field map for the entire reachable workspace to improve the speed of the sampling points close to the target point. At the same time, the greedy approach and the three-time B-sample curve-fitting method were used simultaneously to remove unnecessary points and carry out smooth path processing in order to improve the quality of the drill arm trajectory. This was carried out in order to solve the issue of rough pathways generated by the RRT algorithm. Finally, 50 time-sampling comparison experiments were conducted on 2D and 3D maps. The experimental results showed that the improved RRT algorithm improved the average sampling speed by 20% and reduced the average path length by 14% compared with the RRT algorithm, which verified the feasibility and effectiveness of this improved RRT algorithm. The improved RRT algorithm generates more efficient and smoother paths, which can improve the intelligence of the support process by integrating and automating drilling and anchoring and providing reliable support for coal mine intelligence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Robotics, Mechatronics and Intelligent Machines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Basic structure diagram of the anchor drilling robot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Basic structure diagram of drilling arm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Overall program.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Drilling arm link coordinate system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Three-dimensional diagram of drill arm reachable workspace.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Projection of the workspace. (<b>a</b>) XOY-plane projection; (<b>b</b>) XOZ-plane projection; (<b>c</b>) YOZ-plane projection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>RRT algorithm schematic diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>RRT algorithm—step diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Force analysis of end effector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Greedy algorithm removes path redundancy points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Cubic B-spline fitting diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Three-dimensional space map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Three-dimensional potential field maps. (<b>a</b>) Gravitational potential field; (<b>b</b>) repulsive potential field; (<b>c</b>) combined potential field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Three-dimensional RRT algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Improved RRT algorithm for 3D map. (<b>a</b>) Original route map; (<b>b</b>) greedy algorithm; (<b>c</b>) triple B-splines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Three-dimensional parameter comparison chart. (<b>a</b>) Three-dimensional running time comparison diagram; (<b>b</b>) three-dimensional path length comparison diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Two-dimensional map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Two-dimensional potential field map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Two-dimensional RRT algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Improved RRT algorithm for two-dimensional map. (<b>a</b>) Original route map; (<b>b</b>) greedy algorithm; (<b>c</b>) triple B-splines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Two-dimensional parameter comparison chart. (<b>a</b>) Two-dimensional running time comparison diagram; (<b>b</b>) two-dimensional path length comparison diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Anchor drilling robot prototype platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>RRT algorithm trajectory.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Improved RRT algorithm trajectory.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Data analysis. (<b>a</b>) Time comparison chart; (<b>b</b>) path comparison chart.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 33562 KiB  
Technical Note
Tracking of a Fluorescent Dye in a Freshwater Lake with an Unmanned Surface Vehicle and an Unmanned Aircraft System
by Craig Powers, Regina Hanlon and David G. Schmale
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(1), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010081 - 9 Jan 2018
Cited by 39 | Viewed by 8825
Abstract
Recent catastrophic events in our oceans, including the spill of toxic oil from the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and the rapid dispersion of radioactive particulates from the meltdown of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, underscore the need for new tools [...] Read more.
Recent catastrophic events in our oceans, including the spill of toxic oil from the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and the rapid dispersion of radioactive particulates from the meltdown of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, underscore the need for new tools and technologies to rapidly respond to hazardous agents. Our understanding of the movement and aerosolization of hazardous agents from natural aquatic systems can be expanded upon and used in prevention and tracking. New technologies with coordinated unmanned robotic systems could lead to faster identification and mitigation of hazardous agents in lakes, rivers, and oceans. In this study, we released a fluorescent dye (fluorescein) into a freshwater lake from an anchored floating platform. A fluorometer (fluorescence sensor) was mounted underneath an unmanned surface vehicle (USV, unmanned boat) and was used to detect and track the released dye in situ in real-time. An unmanned aircraft system (UAS) was used to visualize the dye and direct the USV to sample different areas of the dye plume. Image processing tools were used to map concentration profiles of the dye plume from aerial images acquired from the UAS, and these were associated with concentration measurements collected from the sensors onboard the USV. The results of this project have the potential to transform monitoring strategies for hazardous agents, enabling timely and accurate exposure assessment and response in affected areas. Fast response is essential in reacting to the introduction of hazardous agents, in order to quickly predict and contain their spread. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs))
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Site for study was a small cove in Claytor Lake, VA, USA. A kayak (<b>A</b>) was used to anchor a small float (<b>B</b>) near the center of the cove. A small fluorescein puck was placed in a mesh bag to create the plume. The unmanned surface vehicle (USV) (<b>C</b>) was equipped with an onboard fluorometer and was used to conduct a series of slow transects through the dye plume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Clearpath Robotics M200 Kingfisher with the Turner C6 multisensor in the upright and stowed configuration (<b>A</b>,1) and deployed for taking dye measurements near the water surface (<b>B</b>,2). The C6 sensor array can use up to six sensors to simultaneously take environmental measurements such as turbidity and fluorescence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Red, green and blue (RGB) channel levels after adjustment of raw fluorescein plume images taken from the unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to increase color contrast of plume structure (<b>A</b>); creating an enhanced color rendering of the fluorescein plume revealing concentration structures not seen in the raw images (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fluorescein concentration profile as recorded by the Turner C6 equipped USV. Concentration is increasing from location 1 to 2 and then decreasing as the USV traverses the dye plume for a single transect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Heatmap of fluorescein concentration profile using a color matching technique. White represents areas of the highest concentrations (12 ppm) with black representing the lowest concentration (1 ppm). The path of the USV is represented by the white curved line (points 1 to 9) with the plume generation float seen as the black rectangular object in the plume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Fluorescein concentration profile from the Turner C6 sensor (Blue) onboard the USV, and an estimated concentration profile from the heat map for the same plume transect. Points 1 to 9 represent the midpoint of each concentration level from the heatmap as the USV performed the transect.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop