Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (827)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = geostationary

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 6426 KiB  
Article
Unveiling Illumination Variations During a Lunar Eclipse: Multi-Wavelength Spaceborne Observations of the January 21, 2019 Event
by Min Shu, Tianyi Xu, Wei Cai, Shibo Wen, Hengyue Jiao and Yunzhao Wu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(22), 4181; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224181 - 9 Nov 2024
Viewed by 345
Abstract
Space-based observations of the total lunar eclipse on 21 January 2019 were conducted using the geostationary Earth-orbiting satellite Gaofen-4 (GF-4). This study represents a pioneering effort to address the observational gap in full-disk lunar eclipse photometry from space. With its high resolution and [...] Read more.
Space-based observations of the total lunar eclipse on 21 January 2019 were conducted using the geostationary Earth-orbiting satellite Gaofen-4 (GF-4). This study represents a pioneering effort to address the observational gap in full-disk lunar eclipse photometry from space. With its high resolution and ability to capture the entire lunar disk, GF-4 enabled both quantitative and qualitative analyses of the variations in lunar brightness, as well as spectra and color changes, across two spatial dimensions, from the whole lunar disk to resolved regions. Our results indicate that before the totality phase of the lunar eclipse, the irradiance of the Moon diminishes to below approximately 0.19% of that of the uneclipsed Moon. Additionally, we observed an increase in lunar brightness at the initial entry into the penumbra. This phenomenon is attributed to the opposition effect, providing scientific evidence for this unexpected behavior. To investigate detailed spectral variations, specific calibration sites, including the Chang’E-3 landing site, MS-2 in Mare Serenitatis, and the Apollo 16 highlands, were analyzed. Notably, the red-to-blue ratio dropped below 1 near the umbra, contradicting the common perception that the Moon appears red during lunar eclipses. The red/blue ratio images reveal that as the Moon enters Earth’s umbra, it does not simply turn red; instead, a blue-banded ring appears at the boundary due to ozone absorption and the lunar surface composition. These findings significantly enhance our understanding of atmospheric effects on lunar eclipses and provide crucial reference information for the future modeling of lunar eclipse radiation, promoting the integration of remote sensing science with astronomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laser and Optical Remote Sensing for Planetary Exploration)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The effects of removing bad pixels and bad columns for GF-4 B2. (<b>a</b>) Before bad pixels removal; (<b>b</b>) After bad pixels removal; (<b>c</b>) before bad columns removal; (<b>d</b>) after bad columns removal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>GF-4 B4 image mosaic (<b>Top</b>) and true color image mosaic (red: B4; green: B3; and blue: B2) (<b>Bottom</b>) before and after flat-field correction ((<b>Left</b>): before; (<b>Right</b>): after). The non-uniformity problems between the two stripe areas are significantly resolved.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An overview of lunar radiation images obtained with a 30 ms exposure time during the lunar eclipse on 21 January 2019, presented in true color (red: B4; green: B3; and blue: B2). A 2% linear stretch was applied to these images for display enhancement to improve visibility.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Disk-integrated irradiance at the standard distances during the lunar eclipse on 21 January 2019, measured by GF-4 across spectral bands B2–B5. Six sets of double-dotted lines depict each stage of the eclipse, denoted as P1–P4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Three sites in GF-4 color mosaic images captured at 02:30 UTC. (1) CE-3, (2) MS-2, and (3) Apollo-16 highlands. Due to the influence of observational geometry and fact that Site (3) is located in highlands, the brightness observed at site (3) is significantly higher than that of other sites. Consequently, a 2% linear stretch was specifically applied to Site (3) to enhance image contrast.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The radiance spectra variation of CE-3 (<b>Top</b>), MS-2 (<b>Middle</b>) and Apollo 16 highlands (<b>Bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Ratio of eclipsed irradiance to uneclipsed irradiance at corresponding phase angles over time, utilizing the lunar photometric model for GF-4 B2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Ratio images (654 nm/491 nm) from GF-4 data captured at 03:30 UTC, 03:40 UTC, 03:50 UTC, and 04:10 UTC on 21 January 2019.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 533 KiB  
Article
Statistical Analysis of LEO and GEO Satellite Anomalies and Space Radiation
by Jeimmy Nataly Buitrago-Leiva, Mohamed El Khayati Ramouz, Adriano Camps and Joan A. Ruiz-de-Azua
Aerospace 2024, 11(11), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11110924 - 8 Nov 2024
Viewed by 385
Abstract
Exposure to space radiation substantially degrades satellite systems, provoking severe partial or, in some extreme cases, total failures. Electrostatic discharges (ESD), single event latch-up (SEL), and single event upsets (SEU) are among the most frequent causes of those reported satellite anomalies. The impact [...] Read more.
Exposure to space radiation substantially degrades satellite systems, provoking severe partial or, in some extreme cases, total failures. Electrostatic discharges (ESD), single event latch-up (SEL), and single event upsets (SEU) are among the most frequent causes of those reported satellite anomalies. The impact of space radiation dose on satellite equipment has been studied in-depth. This study conducts a statistical analysis to explore the relationships between low-Earth orbit (LEO) and geostationary orbit (GEO) satellite anomalies and particle concentrations, solar and geomagnetic activity in the period 2010–2022. Through a monthly and daily timescale analysis, the present work explores the temporal response of space disturbances on satellite systems and the periods when satellites are vulnerable to those disturbances. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Astronautics & Space Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Radiation particles and their effects on satellite systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Anomaly selection criteria and their categorization per subsystem. F1, F2, F3 F4, and F5 corresponds to the filters described in <a href="#sec3dot1-aerospace-11-00924" class="html-sec">Section 3.1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>LEO/GEO satellites’ anomalies and solar and geomagnetic activity correlation (2010–2022). Sunspot number and CME speed index are used to quantify solar activity, whereas Kp and Dst indices are used to quantify geomagnetic activity. Despite using a monthly timescale for analysis, this figure is plotted by grouping four months for visual simplicity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationship between LEO anomalies and the average SSN, Kp, CME speed, and Dst indices of the month the anomaly occurred and the previous three months, respectively (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>). Relationship between GEO anomalies and the average SSN, Kp, CME speed, and Dst indices of the month the anomaly occurred and the previous three months, respectively (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>). Note: M-1,2,3 indicate the months before the anomalous event, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationship between LEO (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and GEO (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) anomalies and number of days per month with Kp-index ≥ 5 and Dst index ≤−16 of the month the anomaly occurred and the prior three months, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Monthly LEO/GEO anomaly rate correlation with the average SSN, Kp, CME speed, and Dst indices, computed for every month by averaging the 13 samples throughout the study period (2010–2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Assessment of solar and geomagnetic indicators during seven days (anomaly day + 6 prior days), for those days (anomaly day, D) with LEO and GEO anomalies ≥ 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Proton, electron, and X-ray flux time series comparison between days with no reported anomalies (see <a href="#aerospace-11-00924-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>) and those selected days with <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mi>D</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> ≥ 3 during a seven-day window (see <a href="#aerospace-11-00924-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>). Given that one or a few days can have significantly higher particle concentrations than others, logarithmic charts are employed to respond to the large value ranges. Before the log() application, proton (P), electron (E), and X-ray flux (X) were in protons/(cm·day·sr), electrons/(cm·day·sr), and W/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Orbital inclination classification for LEO and GEO satellites whose anomalies were selected for the analysis. The satellites failures percentage in each orbit inclination range is normalized by dividing the total number of satellites failed by active satellites in that range from 2010 to 2022 according to Seradata [<a href="#B38-aerospace-11-00924" class="html-bibr">38</a>].</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 6344 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Fengyun-4B Satellite Temperature Profile Products Using Radiosonde Observations and ERA5 Reanalysis over Eastern Tibetan Plateau
by Yuhao Wang, Xiaofei Wu, Haoxin Zhang, Hong-Li Ren and Kaiqing Yang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(22), 4155; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224155 - 7 Nov 2024
Viewed by 433
Abstract
The latest-generation geostationary meteorological satellite, Fengyun-4B (FY-4B), equipped with the Geostationary Interferometric Infrared Sounder (GIIRS), offers high-spatiotemporal-resolution three-dimensional temperature structures. Its deployment serves as a critical complement to atmospheric temperature profile (ATP) observation in the Tibetan Plateau (TP). Based on radiosonde observation (RAOB) [...] Read more.
The latest-generation geostationary meteorological satellite, Fengyun-4B (FY-4B), equipped with the Geostationary Interferometric Infrared Sounder (GIIRS), offers high-spatiotemporal-resolution three-dimensional temperature structures. Its deployment serves as a critical complement to atmospheric temperature profile (ATP) observation in the Tibetan Plateau (TP). Based on radiosonde observation (RAOB) and the fifth-generation ECMWF global climate atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5), this study validates the availability and representativeness of FY-4B/GIIRS ATP products in the eastern TP region. Due to the issue of satellite zenith, this study focuses solely on examining the eastern TP region. Under a clear sky, FY-4B/GIIRS ATP exhibits good consistency with RAOB compared to cloudy conditions, with an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.57 K. FY-4B/GIIRS tends to underestimate temperatures in the lower layers while overestimating temperatures in the upper layers. The bias varies across seasons. Except for summer, the horizontal and vertical bias distribution patterns are similar, though there are slight differences in values. Despite the presence of bias, FY-4B/GIIRS ATP maintains a good consistency with observations and reanalysis data, indicating commendable product quality. These results demonstrate that it can play a vital role in augmenting the ATP observation network limited by sparse radiosonde stations in the eastern TP, offering crucial data support for numerical weather prediction, weather monitoring, and related meteorological research in this region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Distribution map of the nine RAOB stations (red triangles) over the TP. (<b>b</b>) The FY-4B/GIIRS observation pixels (blue dots) for the Garze station in the MW method at 12 UTC on 17 January 2023. The color shading represents the elevation (units, m), and the red line in (<b>a</b>) indicates the border of the TP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>RMSE (green bars) and the number of effective data (orange bars) for the IDW and the MW method at nine RAOB stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The percentages of the FY-4B/GIIRS ATP products quality flags during clear sky (green bars) and cloudy sky (orange bars).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The average ATP observed by FY-4B/GIIRS (blue line) and RAOB (orange line) and the average bias of FY-4B/GIIRS referring to RAOB (cyan line with triangles) for (<b>a</b>–<b>i</b>) 00 UTC and (<b>j</b>–<b>r</b>) 12 UTC. The light cyan shading accompanied with the bias line indicates one standard variation of the bias.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatter plot of FY-4B/GIIRS ATP versus the RAOB ATP (black dashed line represents the 1:1 line, red line represents regression line). (<b>a</b>–<b>i</b>) represent nine RAOB stations arranged in order of elevation from lowest to highest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-04155-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>, but for ERA5 ATP versus the RAOB ATP. (<b>a</b>–<b>i</b>) represent nine RAOB stations arranged in order of elevation from lowest to highest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Satellite zenith angle (shaded, degree) of FY-4B/GIIRS at 11:00 UTC on 17 January 2024 and the annual mean troposphere temperature (<b>b</b>) before and (<b>c</b>) after filtering based on the satellite zenith angle of 60° as the red line shown in (<b>b</b>). The black line in (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) indicates the TP region. Points A and B in (<b>b</b>) are the intersection points of the contour line of 60° and the borderline of the TP region in (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The spatial distribution of annual mean temperature bias between FY-4B/GIIRS and ERA5 ATP: (<b>a</b>) horizontal distribution of troposphere (600–100 hPa) averaged bias and (<b>b</b>) vertical distribution of regional averaged bias for the blue box in (<b>a</b>). The shading in (<b>b</b>) indicates one STD range of the bias.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scatter plot of seasonal average FY-4B/GIIRS ATP versus ERA5 ATP for each of the four seasons among the eastern TP, the black dashed line represents the 1:1 line, and the red line represents the regression line. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) correspond to winter, spring, summer, and autumn, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The horizontal distribution of annual mean troposphere (600–100 hPa) averaged temperature bias between FY-4B/GIIRS and ERA5 ATP. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) correspond to winter, spring, summer, and autumn, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The vertical distribution of annual mean regional averaged temperature bias between FY-4B/GIIRS and ERA5 ATP for the blue box in <a href="#remotesensing-16-04155-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>a. The shading indicates one STD range of the bias. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) correspond to winter, spring, summer, and autumn, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2978 KiB  
Article
Considerations for a Micromirror Array Optimized for Compressive Sensing (VIS to MIR) in Space Applications
by Ulrike Dauderstädt, Peter Dürr, Detlef Kunze, Sara Francés González, Donato Borrelli, Lorenzo Palombi, Valentina Raimondi and Michael Wagner
J. Imaging 2024, 10(11), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10110282 - 5 Nov 2024
Viewed by 510
Abstract
Earth observation (EO) is crucial for addressing environmental and societal challenges, but it struggles with revisit times and spatial resolution. The EU-funded SURPRISE project aims to improve EO capabilities by studying space instrumentation using compressive sensing (CS) implemented through spatial light modulators (SLMs) [...] Read more.
Earth observation (EO) is crucial for addressing environmental and societal challenges, but it struggles with revisit times and spatial resolution. The EU-funded SURPRISE project aims to improve EO capabilities by studying space instrumentation using compressive sensing (CS) implemented through spatial light modulators (SLMs) based on micromirror arrays (MMAs) to improve the ground sampling distance. In the SURPRISE project, we studied the development of an MMA that meets the requirements of a CS-based geostationary instrument working in the visible (VIS) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectral ranges. This paper describes the optical simulation procedure and the results obtained for analyzing the performance of such an MMA with the goal of identifying a mirror design that would allow the device to meet the optical requirements of this specific application. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Compressive sensing principle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic illustration of the optical principle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mirror actuation modes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mirror deflection vs. addressing voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>On-axis illumination–angles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagonal vs. orthogonal mirror.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Airy disks for different wavelengths (amplitude, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mi>Airy</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>). The mirror size in this example is <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>20</mn> <mo> </mo> <mo>μ</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, as indicated by the gridlines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Optical signal flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Intensity in the Fourier plane, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>, for one pixel in the ‘ON’ state surrounded by pixels in the ‘OFF’ state with the configurations from <a href="#jimaging-10-00282-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a>. The red circles indicate the area seen via the collimator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Efficiency for ‘ON’ and ‘OFF’ pixels, minimum and maximum mirror size (<a href="#jimaging-10-00282-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a>), all parameters in <a href="#jimaging-10-00282-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Intensity, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> in collimator plane for ‘OFF’ pixel with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mi>min</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, diagonal mirror.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Dependency on deflection angle, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>30</mn> <mo> </mo> <mrow> <mo>μ</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>, diagonal mirrors, all parameters in <a href="#jimaging-10-00282-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Dependency on mirror size, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mi>collect</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>δ</mi> </semantics></math> adjusted for <span class="html-italic">p</span>, diagonal mirrors, all parameters in <a href="#jimaging-10-00282-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Dependency on the mirror size, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.35</mn> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mi>collect</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> adjusted for <span class="html-italic">p</span>, diagonal mirrors, all parameters in <a href="#jimaging-10-00282-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Dependency on <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mi>collect</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>30</mn> <mo> </mo> <mrow> <mo>μ</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>, diagonal mirrors, all parameters in <a href="#jimaging-10-00282-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Dependency on mirror size, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>collect</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6.17</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, diagonal mirrors, all parameters in <a href="#jimaging-10-00282-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Diffraction efficiency for different micropixel sizes, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mi>collect</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mrow> <mn>2.35</mn> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Efficiencies for modified system specifications (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>G</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>) as in <a href="#jimaging-10-00282-t005" class="html-table">Table 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 1471 KiB  
Review
Overview of Space-Based Laser Communication Missions and Payloads: Insights from the Autonomous Laser Inter-Satellite Gigabit Network (ALIGN)
by Othman I. Younus, Amna Riaz, Richard Binns, Eamon Scullion, Robert Wicks, Jethro Vernon, Chris Graham, David Bramall, Jurgen Schmoll and Cyril Bourgenot
Aerospace 2024, 11(11), 907; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11110907 - 5 Nov 2024
Viewed by 609
Abstract
This paper examines the growing adoption of laser communication (lasercom) in space missions and payloads for identifying emerging trends and key technology drivers of future optical communications satellite systems. It also presents a comprehensive overview of commercially available and custom-designed lasercom terminals, outlining [...] Read more.
This paper examines the growing adoption of laser communication (lasercom) in space missions and payloads for identifying emerging trends and key technology drivers of future optical communications satellite systems. It also presents a comprehensive overview of commercially available and custom-designed lasercom terminals, outlining their characteristics and specifications to meet the evolving demands of global satellite networks. The analysis explores the technical considerations and challenges associated with integrating lasercom terminals into LEO constellations and the Inter-satellite communications service provision in LEO due to their power, size, and weight constraints. By analyzing advancements in CubeSat lasercom technology designed to cater for the emergence of future mega constellations of interacting small satellites, the paper underscores its promising role in establishing high-performance satellite communication networks for future space exploration and data transmission. In addition, a brief overview of our ALIGN planned mission is provided, which highlights the main key operational features in terms of PAT and link budget analysis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Space Telescopes & Payloads)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Architecture of satellite communication systems via different communication link types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Histogram of link types in satellite communication systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Current design of FOCUS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mission concept in space.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 10136 KiB  
Article
The Combination Application of FY-4 Satellite Products on Typhoon Saola Forecast on the Sea
by Chun Yang, Bingying Shi and Jinzhong Min
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 4105; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16214105 - 2 Nov 2024
Viewed by 591
Abstract
Satellite data play an irreplaceable role in global observation data systems. Effective comprehensive application of satellite products will inevitably improve numerical weather prediction. FengYun-4 (FY-4) series satellites can provide not only radiance data but also retrieval data with high temporal and spatial resolutions. [...] Read more.
Satellite data play an irreplaceable role in global observation data systems. Effective comprehensive application of satellite products will inevitably improve numerical weather prediction. FengYun-4 (FY-4) series satellites can provide not only radiance data but also retrieval data with high temporal and spatial resolutions. To evaluate the potential benefits of the combination application of FY-4 Advanced Geostationary Radiance Imager (AGRI) products on Typhoon Saola analysis and forecast, two group of experiments are set up with the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF). Compared with the benchmark experiment, whose sea surface temperature (SST) is from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis data, the SST replacement experiments with FY-4 A/B SST products significantly improve the track and precipitation forecast, especially with the FY-4B SST product. Based on the above results, AGRI clear-sky and all-sky assimilations with FY-4B SST are implemented with a self-constructed AGRI assimilation module. The results show that the AGRI all-sky assimilation experiment can obtain better analyses and forecasts. Furthermore, it is proven that the combination application of AGRI radiance and SST products is beneficial for typhoon prediction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The weighting function of channels 9-14 of FY-4A AGRI with RTTOV and the U.S. standard atmospheric profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) The evolution of the best track, (<b>b</b>) the central sea level pressure (units: hPa) and maximum wind (units: knot) for Typhoon Saola from 0000 UTC 22 August to 1200 UTC 3 September 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Initial SST (units: K) from (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">CON</span>, (<b>b</b>) SSTA, and (<b>c</b>) SSTB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The predicted (<b>a</b>) track, (<b>b</b>) track errors (units: km), (<b>c</b>) CSLP errors (units: hPa), and (<b>d</b>) MW errors (units: knot) in <span class="html-italic">CON</span> (light blue lines), SSTA (red lines), and SSTB (light green lines) are compared to the JMA best track estimates (blue lines) from 0600 UTC 30 August to 1200 UTC 2 September 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Time series of the U and V components of average steering flow (units: m/s) from 0600 UTC 30 August to 1200 UTC 2 September 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The 24 h accumulated precipitation (units: mm) from 1200 UTC 1 September to 1200 UTC 2 September 2023 of (<b>a</b>) the Micaps observation; (<b>b</b>) the interpolated Micaps observation with a horizontal resolution of 0.5° × 0.5°; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">CON</span>; (<b>d</b>) SSTA; and (<b>e</b>) SSTB. The dots with different colors in (<b>a</b>) represent different accumulated precipitation, as shown in the color bar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Performance diagram for the 24 h accumulated precipitation for the <span class="html-italic">CON</span> (light blue), SSTA (red), and SSTB (light green) with a threshold of (<b>a</b>) 0.01 mm; (<b>b</b>) 10 mm; (<b>c</b>) 25 mm; (<b>d</b>) 50 mm; and (<b>e</b>) 75 mm from 1200 UTC 1 September to 1200 UTC 2 September 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) The AGRI observed brightness temperature (units: K) distributions at channel 9 after QC in (<b>a</b>) CLR and (<b>b</b>) ALL valid at 1500 UTC 30 August 2023. (<b>c</b>) The counts of assimilated AGRI observations at channel 9 in ALL and CLR with different cloud mask types every 3 hr from 0900 UTC 30 August to 1500 UTC 30 August 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The IPs (units: %) over <span class="html-italic">CON</span> of individual experiments every 3 h from 0900 UTC 30 August to 1500 UTC 30 August 2023 in (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">CTTs</span> and (<b>b</b>) agreements on sky conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The predicted (<b>a</b>) track, (<b>b</b>) track errors (units: km), (<b>c</b>) CSLP errors (units: hPa), and (<b>d</b>) MW errors (units: knot) in <span class="html-italic">CON</span> (light blue lines), SSTB (light green lines), CLR (light yellow lines), ALL (orange lines), CLR + SSTB (light red lines), and ALL + SSTB (brown lines) are compared to the JMA best track estimates (blue lines) from 1800 UTC 30 August to 1200 UTC 2 September 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The (<b>a</b>) U and (<b>b</b>) V components of steering flows (units: m/s) from 700 to 200 hPa with an interval of 50 hPa in individual experiments at 0600 UTC 1 September 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-04105-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a> but for (<b>a</b>) the interpolated Micaps observation with a horizontal resolution of 0.5° × 0.5°; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">CON</span>; (<b>c</b>) CLR; (<b>d</b>) ALL; (<b>e</b>) SSTB; (<b>f</b>) CLR + SSTB; and (<b>g</b>) ALL + SSTB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-04105-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a> but for <span class="html-italic">CON</span> (light blue), SSTB (light green), CLR (light yellow), ALL (orange), CLR + SSTB (light red), and ALL + SSTB (brown) with a threshold of (<b>a</b>) 0.01 mm; (<b>b</b>) 10 mm; (<b>c</b>) 25 mm; (<b>d</b>) 50 mm; and (<b>e</b>) 75 mm.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 7524 KiB  
Article
A Study on Typhoon Center Localization Based on an Improved Spatio-Temporally Consistent Scale-Invariant Feature Transform and Brightness Temperature Perturbations
by Chaoyu Yan, Jie Guang, Zhengqiang Li, Gerrit de Leeuw and Zhenting Chen
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 4070; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16214070 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 595
Abstract
Extreme weather events like typhoons have become more frequent due to global climate change. Current typhoon monitoring methods include manual monitoring, mathematical morphological methods, and artificial intelligence. Manual monitoring is accurate but labor-intensive, while AI offers convenience but requires accuracy improvements. Mathematical morphology [...] Read more.
Extreme weather events like typhoons have become more frequent due to global climate change. Current typhoon monitoring methods include manual monitoring, mathematical morphological methods, and artificial intelligence. Manual monitoring is accurate but labor-intensive, while AI offers convenience but requires accuracy improvements. Mathematical morphology methods, such as brightness temperature perturbation (BTP) and a spatio-temporally consistent (STC) Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), remain mainstream for typhoon positioning. This paper enhances BTP and STC SIFT methods for application to Fengyun 4A (FY-4A) Advanced Geosynchronous Radiation Imager (AGRI) L1 data, incorporating parallax correction for more accurate surface longitude and latitude positioning. The applicability of these methods for different typhoon intensities and monitoring time resolutions is analyzed. Automated monitoring with one-hour observation intervals in the northwest Pacific region demonstrates high positioning accuracy, reaching 25 km or better when compared to best path data from the China Meteorological Administration (CMA). For 1 h remote sensing observations, BTP is more accurate for typhoons at or above typhoon intensity, while STC SIFT is more accurate for weaker typhoons. In the current era of a high temporal resolution of typhoon monitoring using geostationary satellites, the method presented in this paper can serve the national meteorological industry for typhoon monitoring, which is beneficial to national pre-disaster prevention work as well as global meteorological research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The yellow rectangular box represents the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Typhoon automatic center positioning process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Parallax correction geometry relationship model [<a href="#B32-remotesensing-16-04070" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The application of the typhoon detection algorithm to identify the typhoon cloud system over the northwest Pacific using FY-4A AGRI level 1 data on 6 November 2019, at 02:00 Beijing time (typhoon HL). (<b>a</b>) The initial data after projection conversion pre-processing, (<b>b</b>) the spatial distribution of the BT over the study area (unit: K), (<b>c</b>) the binarized image of the BT spatial distribution, and (<b>d</b>) further processing that shows the locations of candidate target cloud systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>The application of the typhoon detection algorithm to identify the typhoon cloud system over the northwest Pacific using FY-4A AGRI level 1 data on 6 November 2019, at 02:00 Beijing time (typhoon HL). (<b>a</b>) The initial data after projection conversion pre-processing, (<b>b</b>) the spatial distribution of the BT over the study area (unit: K), (<b>c</b>) the binarized image of the BT spatial distribution, and (<b>d</b>) further processing that shows the locations of candidate target cloud systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The BT distribution of the typhoon cloud system using FY-4A AGRI level 1 data on 6 November 2019, at 02:00 Beijing time: the BT distribution of the target cloud system before (<b>a</b>) and after (<b>b</b>) parallax correction. (<b>c</b>) and (<b>d</b>) show details of the typhoon eye area before and after parallax correction, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results from the BTP typhoon localization algorithm applied to FY-4A AGRI level 1 data over the northwest Pacific on 6 November 2019, at 02:00 Beijing time (typhoon HL): (<b>a</b>) the longitudinal BT gradient near the typhoon eye area (unit: km); (<b>b</b>) latitudinal BT gradient near the typhoon eye area; (<b>c</b>) spatial distribution of BT divergence (unit: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mo>·</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>7</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>); (<b>d</b>) spatial distribution of the BT curl (unit: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mo>·</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>7</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>); (<b>e</b>) spatial distribution of BTP. The location of the typhoon as determined from the BTP distribution is indicated with a red + and the location of the typhoon center provided by CMA is indicated with a blue star.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Results from the BTP typhoon localization algorithm applied to FY-4A AGRI level 1 data over the northwest Pacific on 6 November 2019, at 02:00 Beijing time (typhoon HL): (<b>a</b>) the longitudinal BT gradient near the typhoon eye area (unit: km); (<b>b</b>) latitudinal BT gradient near the typhoon eye area; (<b>c</b>) spatial distribution of BT divergence (unit: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mo>·</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>7</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>); (<b>d</b>) spatial distribution of the BT curl (unit: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mo>·</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>×</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>7</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>); (<b>e</b>) spatial distribution of BTP. The location of the typhoon as determined from the BTP distribution is indicated with a red + and the location of the typhoon center provided by CMA is indicated with a blue star.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Typhoon center localization with the STC SIFT feature method using FY-4A AGRI level 1 data on 6 November 2019, at 02:00 Beijing time (typhoon HL): (<b>a</b>) feature point distributions in the extracted historical image (<b>left</b>) and the current image (<b>right</b>); (<b>b</b>) results of matching the remaining feature points after STC filtering and rotation uniform distribution filtering; (<b>c</b>) the comparison of the final positioning result (red +) with the typhoon center location provided by CMA (blue star).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The comparison of the optimal paths of SD, HMN, HL, and HK determined using two typhoon localization methods, with the best path provided by CMA. The left column shows results from the BTP typhoon localization method and the right column shows results from the STC SIFT feature typhoon localization method for typhoons SD (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), HNM (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), HL (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), and HK (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>). The average accuracy, from comparison with the CMA path, is indicated in each figure. The region outlined by blue lines delineates the portion of the typhoon characterized by lower intensity (before developing into typhoon intensity, TY). <a href="#remotesensing-16-04070-t004" class="html-table">Table 4</a> presents the typhoon localization accuracy for the blue-outlined area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The error analysis of different typhoon localization methods under various typhoon intensities. Panel (<b>a</b>) illustrates the error analysis for STC SIFT at different typhoon intensities; panel (<b>b</b>) shows the error analysis for BTP typhoon localization under varying intensities; and panel (<b>c</b>) depicts the error analysis for BTP localization without parallax correction across different typhoon intensities. The orange line represents the median error, while the green dashed line indicates the mean error. The top and bottom edges of each box correspond to the upper and lower quartiles of the error distribution, and the whiskers denote the maximum and minimum error values.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 13089 KiB  
Article
Development of Vertical Radar Reflectivity Profiles Based on Lightning Density Using the Geostationary Lightning Mapper Dataset in the Subtropical Region of Brazil
by Tiago Bentes Mandú, Laurizio Emanuel Ribeiro Alves, Éder Paulo Vendrasco and Thiago Souza Biscaro
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(20), 3767; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203767 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 523
Abstract
The study aims to develop vertical radar reflectivity profiles based on lightning density data from the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) on the GOES-16 satellite in the subtropical region of Brazil. The primary objective is to improve the assimilation of lightning data in numerical [...] Read more.
The study aims to develop vertical radar reflectivity profiles based on lightning density data from the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) on the GOES-16 satellite in the subtropical region of Brazil. The primary objective is to improve the assimilation of lightning data in numerical weather prediction models. The methodology involves the analysis of polarimetric radar data from Chapecó-SC and Jaraguari-MS, spanning from January 2019 to December 2023, and their correlation with lightning data from the GLM. Radar reflectivity profiles were created for different lightning density classes, categorized into six classes based on geometric progression. Results show a significant relationship between lightning activity and radar reflectivity, with distinct profiles for convective and stratiform events. These findings demonstrate the potential of using GLM data to enhance short-term weather forecasting, particularly for severe weather events. The study concludes that the integration of GLM data into weather models can lead to more accurate predictions of intense precipitation events, contributing to better preparedness and response strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Extreme Weather Events: Monitoring and Modeling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagram illustrating the relationship between a single GLM pixel and the corresponding 9 × 9 radar grid points used for data matching.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Decision tree schematic illustrating the logic used to determine if a reflectivity bin is classified as convective or stratiform. Source: <a href="https://vlab.noaa.gov/web/wdtd/-/convective-stratiform-precipitation-separation-csps-algorithm" target="_blank">https://vlab.noaa.gov/web/wdtd/-/convective-stratiform-precipitation-separation-csps-algorithm</a> (accessed on 26 August 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Vertical radar reflectivity profiles based on lightning density classes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Percentage of data used for composing the average profile by lightning density class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Number of radar profiles by height level and lightning density class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sum of stratiform vertical profiles by lightning density class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Sum of convective vertical profiles by lightning density class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Vertically Integrated Liquid (VIL) for stratiform and convective profiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Map of streamlines at different atmospheric levels (1000, 850, 500, and 250 hPa), Mean Sea Level Pressure (MSLP), and Geopotential Height (GH) on 29 November 2020, at 12:00 UTC over South America.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Map of the brightness temperature from Band 13 of the GOES-16 satellite on 29 November 2020, at 12 UTC over South America.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Map of the thermodynamic indices CAPE and LI on 29 November 2020, at 12 UTC over South America.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Map of the CAPPI composition (dBZ) at 3 km, 5 km, and 7 km from the Chapecó-SC radar and Lightning Density (UNIT) on 29 November 2020, at 12 UTC over South America.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 12939 KiB  
Article
Dust Monitoring and Three-Dimensional Transport Characteristics of Dust Aerosol in Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei
by Siqin Zhang, Jianjun Wu, Jiaqi Yao, Xuefeng Quan, Haoran Zhai, Qingkai Lu, Haobin Xia, Mengran Wang and Jinquan Guo
Atmosphere 2024, 15(10), 1212; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15101212 - 10 Oct 2024
Viewed by 512
Abstract
Global dust events have become more frequent due to climate change and increased human activity, significantly impacting air quality and human health. Previous studies have mainly focused on determining atmospheric dust pollution levels through atmospheric parameter simulations or AOD values obtained from satellite [...] Read more.
Global dust events have become more frequent due to climate change and increased human activity, significantly impacting air quality and human health. Previous studies have mainly focused on determining atmospheric dust pollution levels through atmospheric parameter simulations or AOD values obtained from satellite remote sensing. However, research on the quantitative description of dust intensity and its cross-regional transport characteristics still faces numerous challenges. Therefore, this study utilized Fengyun-4A (FY-4A) satellite Advanced Geostationary Radiation Imager (AGRI) imagery, Cloud-Aerosol Lidar, and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) lidar, and other auxiliary data, to conduct three-dimensional spatiotemporal monitoring and a cross-regional transport analysis of two typical dust events in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region of China using four dust intensity indices Infrared Channel Shortwave Dust (Icsd), Dust Detection Index (DDI), dust value (DV), and Dust Strength Index (DSI)) and the HYSPLIT model. We found that among the four indices, DDI was the most suitable for studying dust in the BTH region, with a detection accuracy (POCD) of >88% at all times and reaching a maximum of 96.14%. Both the 2021 and 2023 dust events originated from large-scale deforestation in southern Mongolia and the border area of Inner Mongolia, with dust plumes distributed between 2 and 12 km being transported across regions to the BTH area. Further, when dust aerosols are primarily concentrated below 4 km and PM10 concentrations consistently exceed 600 µg/m3, large dust storms are more likely to occur in the BTH region. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the sources, transport pathways, and environmental impacts of dust aerosols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Aerosols)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Administrative map. (<b>a</b>) National 1 km DEM elevation map. (<b>b</b>) PM<sub>10</sub> monitoring station distribution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. (<b>c</b>) Bar chart of dust source management project construction in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region (2015–2019).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Technical flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Histogram of frequency distribution for thin clouds, thick clouds, and dust under four dust intensity indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Dust identification results in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region. AGRI true-color images for 15 March 2021, UTC 03:00–06:00 (<b>a<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>a<sub>4</sub></b>), and DDI distribution maps (<b>b<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>b<sub>4</sub></b>); AGRI true-color images for 22 March 2023, UTC 03:00–06:00 (<b>c<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>c<sub>4</sub></b>), and DDI distribution maps (<b>d<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>d<sub>4</sub></b>); DDI violin and boxplot statistics for 15 March 2021, and 22 March 2023, UTC 03:00–06:00 (<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>HYSPLIT backward trajectory simulations and FY-4A true-color images for the two dust events: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Beijing backward trajectory simulation for 15 March 2021; (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) Beijing backward trajectory simulation for 22 March 2023; (<b>c</b>) an FY-4A true-color image for 15 March 2021, at UTC 04:00; (<b>f</b>) an FY-4A true-color image for 22 March 2023, at UTC 04:00.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Vertical distribution characteristics of aerosols and hourly changes in PM<sub>10</sub> concentration in the BTH and Inner Mongolia regions: 15 March 2021, BTH and Inner Mongolia regions (<b>a<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>a<sub>3</sub></b>, <b>b<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>b<sub>3</sub></b>); 21 March 2023, BTH and Inner Mongolia regions (<b>c<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>c<sub>3</sub></b>, <b>d<sub>1</sub></b>–<b>d<sub>3</sub></b>).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 7177 KiB  
Article
Neural Network-Based Estimation of Near-Surface Air Temperature in All-Weather Conditions Using FY-4A AGRI Data over China
by Hai-Lei Liu, Min-Zheng Duan, Xiao-Qing Zhou, Sheng-Lan Zhang, Xiao-Bo Deng and Mao-Lin Zhang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3612; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193612 - 27 Sep 2024
Viewed by 412
Abstract
Near-surface air temperature (Ta) estimation by geostationary meteorological satellites is mainly carried out under clear-sky conditions. In this study, we propose an all-weather Ta estimation method utilizing FY-4A Advanced Geostationary Radiation Imager (AGRI) and the Global Forecast System (GFS), [...] Read more.
Near-surface air temperature (Ta) estimation by geostationary meteorological satellites is mainly carried out under clear-sky conditions. In this study, we propose an all-weather Ta estimation method utilizing FY-4A Advanced Geostationary Radiation Imager (AGRI) and the Global Forecast System (GFS), along with additional auxiliary data. The method includes two neural-network-based Ta estimation models for clear and cloudy skies, respectively. For clear skies, AGRI LST was utilized to estimate the Ta (Ta,clear), whereas cloud top temperature and cloud top height were employed to estimate the Ta for cloudy skies (Ta,cloudy). The estimated Ta was validated using the 2020 data from 1211 stations in China, and the RMSE values of the Ta,clear and Ta,cloudy were 1.80 °C and 1.72 °C, while the correlation coefficients were 0.99 and 0.986, respectively. The performance of the all-weather Ta estimation model showed clear temporal and spatial variation characteristics, with higher accuracy in summer (RMSE = 1.53 °C) and lower accuracy in winter (RMSE = 1.88 °C). The accuracy in southeastern China was substantially better than in western and northern China. In addition, the dependence of the accuracy of the Ta estimation model for LST, CTT, CTH, elevation, and air temperature were analyzed. The global sensitivity analysis shows that AGRI and GFS data are the most important factors for accurate Ta estimation. The AGRI-estimated Ta showed higher accuracy compared to the ERA5-Land data. The proposed models demonstrated potential for Ta estimation under all-weather conditions and are adaptable to other geostationary satellites. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geolocation of the stations used in this study over China. The sites of training and validation data for the near-surface air temperature (<span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span>) estimation model are marked in blue and red colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of all-weather <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> estimation model incorporating multi-source data integration and neural networks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Two-dimensional histogram of AGRI-derived <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> under clear sky (<span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,clear</sub></span>) (<b>a</b>) and <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> under cloudy sky (<span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,cloudy</sub></span>) (<b>b</b>) versus in situ <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> at meteorological stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Histogram of <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> differences between the AGRI-estimated <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,clear</sub></span> (red) and <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,cloudy</sub></span> (blue) versus in situ <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial patterns of R (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), RMSE (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), and bias (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) for the AGRI-derived <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,clear</sub></span> (<b>left</b>) and <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,cloudy</sub></span> (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The monthly variation in RMSE for AGRI-derived (<b>a</b>) and GFS (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,clear</sub></span> and <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,cloudy</sub></span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Time series of in situ and AGRI-derived all-weather <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> at 3 h intervals at four stations in 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of the spatial pattern of GFS (first column), the ERA5−Land (second column) and AGRI-estimated all−weather <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> (third column) at 12:00 UTC on 15 January, April, July, and October 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparisons of ERA5−Land and AGRI <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> with in situ <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> at 12:00 UTC, 15 January (<b>a</b>), April (<b>b</b>), July (<b>c</b>), and October (<b>d</b>) 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of the spatial pattern of all-weather <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> estimated by GFS (<b>a</b>), ERA5-Land (<b>b</b>), and AGRI (<b>c</b>) over Sichuan province at 12:00 UTC on 15 July 2020. The elevation distribution map of Sichuan Province (<b>d</b>) is also presented.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Normalized total sensitivity indexes for predictors of <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,clear</sub></span> (<b>a</b>) and <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,cloud</sub></span> (<b>b</b>) estimation models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Dependence of the RMSE (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and bias (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) of the AGRI <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> estimation models on elevation and <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a</sub></span> for clear and cloudy conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Dependence of the RMSE on LST and CTT for <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,clear</sub></span> (<b>a</b>) and <span class="html-italic">T<sub>a,cloudy</sub></span> (<b>b</b>) models.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 4527 KiB  
Article
Observation of Post-Sunset Equatorial Plasma Bubbles with BDS Geostationary Satellites over South China
by Guanyi Ma, Jinghua Li, Jiangtao Fan, Qingtao Wan, Takashi Maruyama, Liang Dong, Yang Gao, Le Zhang and Dong Wang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(18), 3521; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183521 - 23 Sep 2024
Viewed by 493
Abstract
An equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) is characterized by ionospheric irregularities which disturb radio waves by causing phase and amplitude scintillations or even signal loss. It is becoming increasingly important in space weather to assure the reliability of radio systems in both space and [...] Read more.
An equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) is characterized by ionospheric irregularities which disturb radio waves by causing phase and amplitude scintillations or even signal loss. It is becoming increasingly important in space weather to assure the reliability of radio systems in both space and on the ground. This paper presents a newly established GNSS ionospheric observation network (GION) around the north equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) crest in south China, which has a longitudinal coverage of ∼30° from 94°E to 124°E. The measurement with signals from geostationary earth orbit (GEO) satellites of the BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) is capable of separating the temporal and spatial variations of the ionosphere. A temporal fluctuation of TEC (TFT) parameter is proposed to characterize EPBs. The longitude of the EPBs’ generation can be located with TFT variations in the time–longitude dimension. It is found that the post-sunset EPBs have a high degree of longitudinal variability. They generally show a quasiperiodic feature, indicating their association with atmospheric gravity wave activities. Wave-like structures with different scale sizes can co-exist in the same night. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>IPPs at a shell height of 400 km observed by the GION receivers of the BDS, GPS, and GAL at 11:30 UT on 23 February 2024. A cutoff angle of 30° is applied. The asterisk in magnenta shows the GNSS receiver’s position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>EPBs detected on 6 October 2023. (<b>a</b>) vTEC, (<b>b</b>) TFTg and (<b>c</b>) ROTIg in the left are from observation by BDG 2. (<b>d</b>) vTEC, (<b>e</b>) TFTg and (<b>f</b>) ROTIg in the right are from observation by BDG 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>EPBs observed on 8 September 2023. (<b>a</b>) TFTg, (<b>b</b>) ROTIg and (<b>c</b>) ROTIi as a function of longitude and time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>EPBs observed on 6 October 2023. (<b>a</b>) TFTg, (<b>b</b>) ROTIg and (<b>c</b>) ROTIi as a function of longitude and time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>EPBs observed on 23 February 2024. (<b>a</b>) TFTg, (<b>b</b>) ROTIg and (<b>c</b>) ROTIi as a function of longitude and time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Longitude Coverage of EPBs’ Daily Occurrence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Daily number of EPB generations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Monthly generation rate of EPBs in 5 belts in the range of [97.5°E, 122.5°E].</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5222 KiB  
Article
Impact of Assimilating Geostationary Interferometric Infrared Sounder Observations from Long- and Middle-Wave Bands on Weather Forecasts with a Locally Cloud-Resolving Global Model
by Zhipeng Xian, Jiang Zhu, Shian-Jiann Lin, Zhi Liang, Xi Chen and Keyi Chen
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(18), 3458; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183458 - 18 Sep 2024
Viewed by 492
Abstract
The Geostationary Interferometric InfraRed Sounder (GIIRS) provides a novel opportunity to acquire high-spatiotemporal-resolution atmospheric information. Previous studies have demonstrated the positive impacts of assimilating GIIRS radiances from either long-wave temperature or middle-wave water vapor bands on modeling high-impact weather processes. However, the impact [...] Read more.
The Geostationary Interferometric InfraRed Sounder (GIIRS) provides a novel opportunity to acquire high-spatiotemporal-resolution atmospheric information. Previous studies have demonstrated the positive impacts of assimilating GIIRS radiances from either long-wave temperature or middle-wave water vapor bands on modeling high-impact weather processes. However, the impact of assimilating both bands on forecast skill has been less investigated, primarily due to the non-identical geolocations for both bands. In this study, a locally cloud-resolving global model is utilized to assess the impact of assimilating GIIRS observations from both long-wave and middle-wave bands. The findings indicate that the GIIRS observations exhibit distinct inter-channel error correlations. Proper inflation of these errors can compensate for inaccuracies arising from the treatment of the geolocation of the two bands, leading to a significant enhancement in the usage of GIIRS observations from both bands. The assimilation of GIIRS observations not only markedly reduces the normalized departure standard deviations for most channels of independent instruments, but also improves the atmospheric states, especially for temperature forecasting, with a maximum reduction of 42% in the root-mean-square error in the lower troposphere. These improvements contribute to better performance in predicting heavy rainfall. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The geolocation of the long-wave (red) and middle-wave (blue) bands of the GIIRS observations (the numbers in the boxes indicate the pixel order).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The brightness temperatures (blue) and weighting function peaks (red) for long-wave (<b>a</b>) and middle-wave (<b>b</b>) bands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The time series of the OMBs for channels 7 (<b>a</b>), 27 (<b>b</b>), 87 (<b>c</b>), 262 (<b>d</b>), 347 (<b>e</b>), and 1174 (<b>f</b>) from 0000 UTC 1 June 2021 to 0000 UTC 15 July 2021 at 6 h intervals (the format of the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis label: hour/day; black line: without any bias corrections; red line: with FOR bias correction; blue line: with variational bias correction).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The averaged OMBs of each FOV at 0000 UTC (blue), 0600 UTC (red), 1200 UTC (brown), and 1800 UTC (yellow) analysis time for channels 7 (<b>a</b>), 27 (<b>b</b>), 87 (<b>c</b>), 262 (<b>d</b>), 347 (<b>e</b>), and 1174 (<b>f</b>) from 0000 UTC 1 June 2021 to 0000 UTC 15 July 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Observation error correlation matrix for GIIRS as diagnosed by the Desroziers method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The resolution (interval: 4 km) of the C768 SD3 global model (the contour labeled with 4 indicates the study region).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The ACCs of the 500 hPa geopotential height over Asia (<b>a</b>), southern hemisphere (<b>b</b>), northern hemisphere (<b>c</b>), global (<b>d</b>), and China (<b>e</b>), as well as the 24 h (<b>f</b>), 48 h (<b>g</b>), 72 h (<b>h</b>), 96 h (<b>i</b>), and 120 h (<b>j</b>) accumulated precipitation forecasts over China in the C768 SD3 model (orange), initialized with NCEP analyses, compared to NCEP-GFS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Normalized change in the standard deviation of OMBs for the ATMS (<b>a</b>), CrIS’s long-wave temperature channels (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>), and water vapor channels (<b>d</b>) over China in the GIIRS_INF1 (blue), GIIRS_INF2 (red), and GIIRS_INF3 (green) experiments (the zero line indicates the CONTROL experiment).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Normalized change in the RMS errors versus the radiosonde measurements of specific humidity ((<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>); unit: 10<sup>−2</sup> mg kg<sup>−1</sup>), virtual temperature ((<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>); unit: K), and zonal wind ((<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>); unit: m s<sup>−1</sup>) in day-2 (left) and day-4 (right) forecasts in the GIIRS_INF1 (blue), GIIRS_INF2 (red), and GIIRS_INF3 (green) experiments. Error bars give the 95% confident range.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The ETSs of the accumulated precipitation on day 2 (<b>a</b>) and day 4 (<b>b</b>) in the CONTROL (yellow), GIIRS_INF1 (blue), GIIRS_INF2 (red), and GIIRS_INF3 (green) experiments.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 6198 KiB  
Article
The China Coastal Front from Himawari-8 AHI SST Data—Part 2: South China Sea
by Igor M. Belkin, Shang-Shang Lou, Yi-Tao Zang and Wen-Bin Yin
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(18), 3415; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183415 - 14 Sep 2024
Viewed by 441
Abstract
High-resolution (2 km) high-frequency (hourly) SST data from 2015 to 2021 provided by the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard the Japanese Himawari-8 geostationary satellite were used to study spatial and temporal variability of the China Coastal Front (CCF) in the South China Sea. [...] Read more.
High-resolution (2 km) high-frequency (hourly) SST data from 2015 to 2021 provided by the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard the Japanese Himawari-8 geostationary satellite were used to study spatial and temporal variability of the China Coastal Front (CCF) in the South China Sea. The SST data were processed with the Belkin and O’Reilly (2009) algorithm to generate monthly maps of the CCF’s intensity (defined as SST gradient magnitude GM) and frontal frequency (FF). The horizontal structure of the CCF was investigated from cross-frontal distributions of SST along 11 fixed lines that allowed us to determine inshore and offshore boundaries of the CCF and calculate the CCF’s strength (defined as total cross-frontal step of SST). Combined with the results of Part 1 of this study, where the CCF was documented in the East China Sea, the new results reported in this paper allowed the CCF to be traced from the Yangtze Bank to Hainan Island. The CCF is continuous in winter, when its intensity peaks at 0.15 °C/km (based on monthly data). In summer, when the Guangdong Coastal Current reverses and flows eastward, the CCF’s intensity is reduced to 0.05 °C/km or less, especially off western Guangdong, where the CCF vanishes almost completely. Owing to its breadth (50–100 km, up to 200 km in the Taiwan Strait), the CCF is a very strong front, especially in winter, when the total SST step across the CCF peaks at 9 °C in the Taiwan Strait. The CCF’s strength decreases westward to 6 °C off eastern Guangdong, 5 °C off western Guangdong, and 2 °C off Hainan Island, all in mid-winter. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Long-term (2015–2021) mean monthly SST (°C) in the northern South China Sea.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Histograms of long-term (2015–2021) mean monthly SST gradient magnitude GM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Long-term (2015–2021) mean monthly gradient magnitude GM of SST. Color scales of GM are adjusted monthly using the respective monthly histograms of GM (<a href="#remotesensing-16-03415-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Long-term (2015–2021) mean monthly frontal frequency FF at GM ≥ 0.1 °C/km.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Bathymetry of the northern South China Sea and locations of 11 fixed lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Long-term (2015–2021) mean monthly distributions of SST along 11 meridional and zonal lines across the northern South China Sea in January–June. The SST curve numbers in the plot legends correspond to the fixed line numbers in <a href="#remotesensing-16-03415-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Long-term (2015–2021) mean monthly distributions of SST along 11 meridional and zonal lines across the northern South China Sea in July–December. The SST curve numbers in the plot legends correspond to the fixed line numbers in <a href="#remotesensing-16-03415-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 4362 KiB  
Article
Himawari-8 Sea Surface Temperature Products from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology
by Pallavi Govekar, Christopher Griffin, Owen Embury, Jonathan Mittaz, Helen Mary Beggs and Christopher J. Merchant
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(18), 3381; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183381 - 11 Sep 2024
Viewed by 845
Abstract
As a contribution to the Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS), the Bureau of Meteorology introduces new reprocessed Himawari-8 satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperature (SST) products. The Radiative Transfer Model and a Bayesian cloud clearing method is used to retrieve SSTs every 10 min from [...] Read more.
As a contribution to the Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS), the Bureau of Meteorology introduces new reprocessed Himawari-8 satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperature (SST) products. The Radiative Transfer Model and a Bayesian cloud clearing method is used to retrieve SSTs every 10 min from the geostationary satellite Himawari-8. An empirical Sensor Specific Error Statistics (SSES) model, introduced herein, is applied to calculate bias and standard deviation for the retrieved SSTs. The SST retrieval and compositing method, along with validation results, are discussed. The monthly statistics for comparisons of Himawari-8 Level 2 Product (L2P) skin SST against in situ SST quality monitoring (iQuam) in situ SST datasets, adjusted for thermal stratification, showed a mean bias of −0.2/−0.1 K and a standard deviation of 0.4–0.7 K for daytime/night-time after bias correction, where satellite zenith angles were less than 60° and the quality level was greater than 2. For ease of use, these native resolution SST data have been composited using a method introduced herein that retains retrieved measurements, to hourly, 4-hourly and daily SST products, and projected onto the rectangular IMOS 0.02 degree grid. On average, 4-hourly products cover ≈10% more of the IMOS domain, while one-night composites cover ≈25% more of the IMOS domain than a typical 1 h composite. All available Himawari-8 data have been reprocessed for the September 2015–December 2022 period. The 10 min temporal resolution of the newly developed Himawari-8 SST data enables a daily composite with enhanced spatial coverage, effectively filling in SST gaps caused by transient clouds occlusion. Anticipated benefits of the new Himawari-8 products include enhanced data quality for applications like IMOS OceanCurrent and investigations into marine thermal stress, marine heatwaves, and ocean upwelling in near-coastal regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) SST, (<b>b</b>) probability of a pixel being clear, (<b>c</b>) sensitivity, and (<b>d</b>) assigned quality levels for one random L2P on 15 December 2020, 20:00:00 UTC, for all quality levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="monospace">sses</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi mathvariant="monospace">bias</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="monospace">sses</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi mathvariant="monospace">standard</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi mathvariant="monospace">deviation</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="monospace">sses</mi> <mo>_</mo> <mi mathvariant="monospace">count</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> for one random L2P on 15th December 2020, 20:00:00 UTC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Full disk spatial coverage Himawari-8 L2P validation against drifting buoys and tropical moorings, September 2015–December 2022, showing the impact of bias correction on day (<b>top</b>) and night (<b>bottom</b>) retrievals, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mi> <mi>SST</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Left—hand panels show variables before bias correction, and right—hand panels after bias correction have been applied to the SST values. The grey region indicates pixels with no data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-03381-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>, for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mi> <mi>SST</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-03381-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>, for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> <mi>zSST</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Annual and diurnal performance of full disk Himawari-8 L2P validation against drifting buoys and tropical moorings for September 2015–December 2022 for (<b>a</b>) northern and (<b>b</b>) southern part of the disk. The colour indicates mean bias, when bias-corrected SST is compared with drifting buoys and tropical moorings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-03381-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. Here, the colour indicates standard deviation, when bias-corrected SST compared with drifting buoys and tropical moorings for (<b>a</b>) northern and (<b>b</b>) southern part of the disk.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-03381-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. Here, the colour indicates <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>z</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, when bias-corrected SST is compared with drifting buoys and tropical moorings for (<b>a</b>) northern and (<b>b</b>) southern part of the disk.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Full disk Himawari-8 L2P skin SST validation against drifting buoys and tropical moorings, 30-day running statistics, September 2015–December 2022, (<b>a</b>) uncorrected mean, (<b>b</b>) bias-corrected mean, (<b>c</b>) uncorrected standard deviation, and (<b>d</b>) bias-corrected standard deviation, for QL ≥ 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Full disk Himawari-8 L2P skin SST validation against drifting buoys and tropical moorings, 30-day running statistics, September 2015–December 2022, (<b>a</b>) uncorrected mean, (<b>b</b>) bias-corrected mean, (<b>c</b>) uncorrected standard deviation, and (<b>d</b>) bias-corrected standard deviation, for QL ≥ 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Composite SSTs for (<b>a</b>) 1 h, (<b>b</b>) 4 h and (<b>c</b>) 1 night on the IMOS domain for 15 December 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Monthly statistics for validation of 1-hour L3C skin SST against drifting buoys and tropical moorings for September 2015–December 2022 on the IMOS domain, uncorrected (<b>a</b>) mean and (<b>c</b>) standard deviation, bias-corrected (<b>b</b>) mean and (<b>d</b>) standard deviation, for QL ≥ 3. Daytime validations are shown in blue, and night-time validations in orange.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Monthly statistics for validation of 1-hour L3C skin SST against drifting buoys and tropical moorings for September 2015–December 2022 on the IMOS domain, uncorrected (<b>a</b>) mean and (<b>c</b>) standard deviation, bias-corrected (<b>b</b>) mean and (<b>d</b>) standard deviation, for QL ≥ 3. Daytime validations are shown in blue, and night-time validations in orange.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-03381-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a>, for L3C-4hour SSTs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>Same as <a href="#remotesensing-16-03381-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a>, for L3C-4hour SSTs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Monthly statistics for 1-day Night L3C skin SST validation against drifting buoys and tropical moorings for September 2015–December 2022 for the IMOS domain (<b>a</b>) mean, (<b>b</b>) standard deviation, for QL ≥ 3. The brown line denotes uncorrected data, whereas the cyan line corresponds to bias−corrected data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>SST data coverage from (<b>a</b>) MultiSensor and (<b>b</b>) GeoPolar MultiSensor L3S SST product on the IMOS domain for 15th December 2020.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 12898 KiB  
Article
The Reconstruction of FY-4A and FY-4B Cloudless Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation and Full-Coverage Particulate Matter Products Reveals the Influence of Meteorological Factors in Pollution Events
by Zhihao Song, Lin Zhao, Qia Ye, Yuxiang Ren, Ruming Chen and Bin Chen
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(18), 3363; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183363 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 580
Abstract
By utilizing top-of-atmosphere radiation (TOAR) data from China’s new generation of geostationary satellites (FY-4A and FY-4B) along with interpretable machine learning models, near-surface particulate matter concentrations in China were estimated, achieving hourly temporal resolution, 4 km spatial resolution, and 100% spatial coverage. First, [...] Read more.
By utilizing top-of-atmosphere radiation (TOAR) data from China’s new generation of geostationary satellites (FY-4A and FY-4B) along with interpretable machine learning models, near-surface particulate matter concentrations in China were estimated, achieving hourly temporal resolution, 4 km spatial resolution, and 100% spatial coverage. First, the cloudless TOAR data were matched and modeled with the solar radiation products from the ERA5 dataset to construct and estimate a fully covered TOAR dataset under assumed clear-sky conditions, which increased coverage from 20–30% to 100%. Subsequently, this dataset was applied to estimate particulate matter. The analysis demonstrated that the fully covered TOAR dataset (R2 = 0.83) performed better than the original cloudless dataset (R2 = 0.76). Additionally, using feature importance scores and SHAP values, the impact of meteorological factors and air mass trajectories on the increase in PM10 and PM2.5 during dust events were investigated. The analysis of haze events indicated that the main meteorological factors driving changes in particulate matter included air pressure, temperature, and boundary layer height. The particulate matter concentration products obtained using fully covered TOAR data exhibit high coverage and high spatiotemporal resolution. Combined with data-driven interpretable machine learning, they can effectively reveal the influencing factors of particulate matter in China. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area. The region covered in this study includes the entire territory of China. The green dots represent air quality monitoring stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Performance of the TOAR data estimation model. The dark dotted line represents the error line, the light dotted line represents the 1:1 line, and the solid red line represents the linear regression fitting line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Full coverage TOAR: particulate matter estimation model based on sample cross-validation results. The dark dotted line represents the error line, the light dotted line represents the 1:1 line, and the solid red line represents the linear regression fitting line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Full coverage TOAR: particulate matter estimation model based on spatial validation results. The dark dotted line represents the error line, the light dotted line represents the 1:1 line, and the solid red line represents the linear regression fitting line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The annual average distribution of the particulate matter estimation results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations during the development of the dust storm event. (<b>Left</b>) Distribution of PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations. (<b>Right</b>) Distribution of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Interpretation of the dust transport model for ΔPM<sub>10</sub> and ΔPM<sub>2.5</sub>.The solid red line represents the linear regression fitting line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>SHAP importance scores of variables impacting ΔPM<sub>10</sub> and ΔPM<sub>2.5</sub> during dust storm processes. The variables shown in the figure include the following: lat: latitude, lon: longitude, height: air mass height, pressures: the air pressure at the height of the air mass, TM: temperatures, SP: surface pressures, WS: wind speeds, RH: relative humidities, BLH: boundary layer heights, SOR: surface solar radiation, LUCC: land use and land cover, HEIGHT: altitude, and RK: population density.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Distribution of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations during the development of the haze event. <b>Left</b>: Distribution of PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations. <b>Right</b>: Distribution of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>SHAP importance scores of various variables affecting ΔPM<sub>10</sub> and ΔPM<sub>2.5</sub> during haze weather.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop