Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = astrionics

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 7002 KiB  
Article
Passive Electro-Optical Tracking of Resident Space Objects for Distributed Satellite Systems Autonomous Navigation
by Khaja Faisal Hussain, Kathiravan Thangavel, Alessandro Gardi and Roberto Sabatini
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(6), 1714; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061714 - 22 Mar 2023
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3418 | Correction
Abstract
Autonomous navigation (AN) and manoeuvring are increasingly important in distributed satellite systems (DSS) in order to avoid potential collisions with space debris and other resident space objects (RSO). In order to accomplish collision avoidance manoeuvres, tracking and characterization of RSO is crucial. At [...] Read more.
Autonomous navigation (AN) and manoeuvring are increasingly important in distributed satellite systems (DSS) in order to avoid potential collisions with space debris and other resident space objects (RSO). In order to accomplish collision avoidance manoeuvres, tracking and characterization of RSO is crucial. At present, RSO are tracked and catalogued using ground-based observations, but space-based space surveillance (SBSS) represents a valid alternative (or complementary asset) due to its ability to offer enhanced performances in terms of sensor resolution, tracking accuracy, and weather independence. This paper proposes a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for DSS AN and manoeuvring, specifically addressing RSO tracking and collision avoidance requirements as an integral part of the overall system design. More specifically, a DSS architecture employing hyperspectral sensors for Earth observation is considered, and passive electro-optical sensors are used, in conjunction with suitable mathematical algorithms, to accomplish autonomous RSO tracking and classification. Simulation case studies are performed to investigate the tracking and system collision avoidance capabilities in both space-based and ground-based tracking scenarios. Results corroborate the effectiveness of the proposed AN technique and highlight its potential to supplement either conventional (ground-based) or SBSS tracking methods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autonomous Space Navigation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Space environment statistics by ESA; (<b>b</b>) Space debris population estimation by ESA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Various SBSS missions during their respective timelines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simplified conceptual illustration for ground-based scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Multi sensor RSO tracking for space-based scenario, (<b>b</b>) Multi sensor RSO tracking for ground-based scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Proposed DSS constellation with 4 orbital planes (not to scale); (<b>b</b>) Simplified DSS system architecture for a single orbital plane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Inter-Satellite links between the DSS assets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) HyperScout-2; (<b>b</b>) MAI-SS star tracker, Adcole Maryland Aerospace [<a href="#B89-remotesensing-15-01714" class="html-bibr">89</a>,<a href="#B90-remotesensing-15-01714" class="html-bibr">90</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>AN system architecture for SBSS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Ground-based surveillance scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>AN system architecture for ground-based tracking scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Uncertainty volumes around the tracked RSO in space-based scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Uncertainty volumes around the tracked RSO in ground-based scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Change in thrust control angles in time (SBSS scenario).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Change in thrust control angles over time (ground-based scenario).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Change in semimajor axis from initial to final trajectory (SBSS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Change in semimajor axis from initial to final trajectory (ground-based scenario).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 7975 KiB  
Article
Trusted Autonomous Operations of Distributed Satellite Systems Using Optical Sensors
by Kathiravan Thangavel, Dario Spiller, Roberto Sabatini, Stefania Amici, Nicolas Longepe, Pablo Servidia, Pier Marzocca, Haytham Fayek and Luigi Ansalone
Sensors 2023, 23(6), 3344; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063344 - 22 Mar 2023
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3625
Abstract
Recent developments in Distributed Satellite Systems (DSS) have undoubtedly increased mission value due to the ability to reconfigure the spacecraft cluster/formation and incrementally add new or update older satellites in the formation. These features provide inherent benefits, such as increased mission effectiveness, multi-mission [...] Read more.
Recent developments in Distributed Satellite Systems (DSS) have undoubtedly increased mission value due to the ability to reconfigure the spacecraft cluster/formation and incrementally add new or update older satellites in the formation. These features provide inherent benefits, such as increased mission effectiveness, multi-mission capabilities, design flexibility, and so on. Trusted Autonomous Satellite Operation (TASO) are possible owing to the predictive and reactive integrity features offered by Artificial Intelligence (AI), including both on-board satellites and in the ground control segments. To effectively monitor and manage time-critical events such as disaster relief missions, the DSS must be able to reconfigure autonomously. To achieve TASO, the DSS should have reconfiguration capability within the architecture and spacecraft should communicate with each other through an Inter-Satellite Link (ISL). Recent advances in AI, sensing, and computing technologies have resulted in the development of new promising concepts for the safe and efficient operation of the DSS. The combination of these technologies enables trusted autonomy in intelligent DSS (iDSS) operations, allowing for a more responsive and resilient approach to Space Mission Management (SMM) in terms of data collection and processing, especially when using state-of-the-art optical sensors. This research looks into the potential applications of iDSS by proposing a constellation of satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) for near-real-time wildfire management. For spacecraft to continuously monitor Areas of Interest (AOI) in a dynamically changing environment, satellite missions must have extensive coverage, revisit intervals, and reconfiguration capability that iDSS can offer. Our recent work demonstrated the feasibility of AI-based data processing using state-of-the-art on-board astrionics hardware accelerators. Based on these initial results, AI-based software has been successively developed for wildfire detection on-board iDSS satellites. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed iDSS architecture, simulation case studies are performed considering different geographic locations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Classification of satellite systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Current state-of-the-art DSS operations; (<b>b</b>) DSS operation with ISL, i.e., iDSS. Adapted from [<a href="#B3-sensors-23-03344" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>ISL classification [<a href="#B31-sensors-23-03344" class="html-bibr">31</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Link distance against data rates for optical and RF ISL systems. Adapted from [<a href="#B36-sensors-23-03344" class="html-bibr">36</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) ISL relationship between the orbits and the ground station; (<b>b</b>) proposed iDSS constellation with ISL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>An instance of the proposed EO constellation illustration with inter-orbital plane ISL and ground link.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Wildfire segmentation map of the hyperspectral imagery over Australia [<a href="#B56-sensors-23-03344" class="html-bibr">56</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>An illustrative view of iDSS reconfiguration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Satellite Field of View: (<b>a</b>) nadir pointing; (<b>b</b>) reconfiguration at the entry; (<b>c</b>) reconfiguration at the exit [<a href="#B35-sensors-23-03344" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Australia: (<b>a</b>) system-wide access status; (<b>b</b>) system-wide access status with reconfiguration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Africa: (<b>a</b>) system-wide access status; (<b>b</b>) system-wide access status with reconfiguration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Italy: (<b>a</b>) system-wide access status; (<b>b</b>) system-wide access status with reconfiguration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>USA: (<b>a</b>) system-wide access status; (<b>b</b>) system-wide access status with reconfiguration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Australia satellite access duration with reconfiguration and its orbit.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 6671 KiB  
Article
A Distributed Satellite System for Multibaseline AT-InSAR: Constellation of Formations for Maritime Domain Awareness Using Autonomous Orbit Control
by Kathiravan Thangavel, Pablo Servidia, Roberto Sabatini, Pier Marzocca, Haytham Fayek, Santiago Husain Cerruti, Martin España and Dario Spiller
Aerospace 2023, 10(2), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10020176 - 14 Feb 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3591
Abstract
Space-based Earth Observation (EO) systems have undergone a continuous evolution in the twenty-first century. With the help of space-based Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA), specially Automatic Identification Systems (AIS), their applicability across the world’s waterways, among others, has grown substantially. This research work explores [...] Read more.
Space-based Earth Observation (EO) systems have undergone a continuous evolution in the twenty-first century. With the help of space-based Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA), specially Automatic Identification Systems (AIS), their applicability across the world’s waterways, among others, has grown substantially. This research work explores the potential applicability of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Distributed Satellite Systems (DSS) for the MDA operation. A robust multi-baseline Along-Track Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (AT-InSAR) Formation Flying concept is proposed to combine several along-track baseline observations effectively for single-pass interferometry. Simulation results are presented to support the feasibility of implementing this acquisition mode with autonomous orbit control, using low-thrust actuation suitable for electric propulsion. To improve repeatability, a constellation of this formation concept is also proposed to combine the benefits of the DSS. An MDA application is considered as a hypothetical mission to be solved by this combined approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Avionics and Astrionics Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A possible satellite system classification, with SAR satellite implementation examples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Inter-Satellite Link (ISL) topologies within the DSS, adapted from [<a href="#B22-aerospace-10-00176" class="html-bibr">22</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chief-deputy classification (<b>a</b>) leader-follower, (<b>b</b>) pendulum, (<b>c</b>) cartwheel, (<b>d</b>) helix configuration, (<b>e</b>) same-ground track.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A simplified SAR classification. Solid lines are definitive classification and dashed line are the possible combination.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>AT-InSAR baseline difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Example of relative eccentricity <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>δ</mi> <mrow> <msub> <munder accentunder="true"> <mi>e</mi> <mo>_</mo> </munder> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (in red) and relative inclination <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>δ</mi> <mrow> <msub> <munder accentunder="true"> <mi>i</mi> <mo>_</mo> </munder> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (in green) vectors of two followers <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>) Simulation of a Robust Multibaseline AT-InSAR formation for follower 1. (<b>a</b>) Shows the components of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <munder accentunder="true"> <mi>e</mi> <mo>_</mo> </munder> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <munder accentunder="true"> <mi>i</mi> <mo>_</mo> </munder> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) shows the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <msubsup> <munder accentunder="true"> <mi>r</mi> <mo>_</mo> </munder> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and (<b>c</b>) shows the along track separation between follower 1 and the chief. (<b>B</b>) Simulation of a Robust Multibaseline AT-InSAR formation for follower 2. (<b>a</b>) Shows the components of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <munder accentunder="true"> <mi>e</mi> <mo>_</mo> </munder> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <munder accentunder="true"> <mi>i</mi> <mo>_</mo> </munder> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) shows the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <msubsup> <munder accentunder="true"> <mi>r</mi> <mo>_</mo> </munder> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and (<b>c</b>) shows the along track separation between follower 2 and the chief.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Control acceleration for the follower 1—chief formation, where red is the Radial, green is the Transverse, and blue is the Normal component.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Safe condition evaluation for follower 1—chief formation. 5. Constellation of Formations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>A constellation of two formations with three satellites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Control acceleration results with chief/follower mass ratio <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Control acceleration results with chief/follower mass ratio <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>DeltaV on a formation reconfiguration as a function of the mass ratio <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>β</mi> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 4487 KiB  
Article
Autonomous Satellite Wildfire Detection Using Hyperspectral Imagery and Neural Networks: A Case Study on Australian Wildfire
by Kathiravan Thangavel, Dario Spiller, Roberto Sabatini, Stefania Amici, Sarathchandrakumar Thottuchirayil Sasidharan, Haytham Fayek and Pier Marzocca
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(3), 720; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030720 - 26 Jan 2023
Cited by 64 | Viewed by 11433
Abstract
One of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals is climate action (SDG-13), and wildfire is among the catastrophic events that both impact climate change and are aggravated by it. In Australia and other countries, large-scale wildfires have dramatically grown in frequency and [...] Read more.
One of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals is climate action (SDG-13), and wildfire is among the catastrophic events that both impact climate change and are aggravated by it. In Australia and other countries, large-scale wildfires have dramatically grown in frequency and size in recent years. These fires threaten the world’s forests and urban woods, cause enormous environmental and property damage, and quite often result in fatalities. As a result of their increasing frequency, there is an ongoing debate over how to handle catastrophic wildfires and mitigate their social, economic, and environmental repercussions. Effective prevention, early warning, and response strategies must be well-planned and carefully coordinated to minimise harmful consequences to people and the environment. Rapid advancements in remote sensing technologies such as ground-based, aerial surveillance vehicle-based, and satellite-based systems have been used for efficient wildfire surveillance. This study focuses on the application of space-borne technology for very accurate fire detection under challenging conditions. Due to the significant advances in artificial intelligence (AI) techniques in recent years, numerous studies have previously been conducted to examine how AI might be applied in various situations. As a result of its special physical and operational requirements, spaceflight has emerged as one of the most challenging application fields. This work contains a feasibility study as well as a model and scenario prototype for a satellite AI system. With the intention of swiftly generating alerts and enabling immediate actions, the detection of wildfires has been studied with reference to the Australian events that occurred in December 2019. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed, trained, and used from the ground up to detect wildfires while also adjusting their complexity to meet onboard implementation requirements for trusted autonomous satellite operations (TASO). The capability of a 1-dimensional convolution neural network (1-DCNN) to classify wildfires is demonstrated in this research and the results are assessed against those reported in the literature. In order to enable autonomous onboard data processing, various hardware accelerators were considered and evaluated for onboard implementation. The trained model was then implemented in the following: Intel Movidius NCS-2 and Nvidia Jetson Nano and Nvidia Jetson TX2. Using the selected onboard hardware, the developed model was then put into practice and analysis was carried out. The results were positive and in favour of using the technology that has been proposed for onboard data processing to enable TASO on future missions. The findings indicate that data processing onboard can be very beneficial in disaster management and climate change mitigation by facilitating the generation of timely alerts for users and by enabling rapid and appropriate responses. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Fire detection methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Levels of processing from data to services [<a href="#B46-remotesensing-15-00720" class="html-bibr">46</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The RGB PRISMA composite image with labelled points defined for the five classes. Pixels within the white rectangles are used for the test, the others for training and validation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Multi-class classification CNN model [<a href="#B18-remotesensing-15-00720" class="html-bibr">18</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Block schematic for the Movidius Stick implementation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Block diagram for the optimisation and implementation with Intel OpenVino.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>High-level representation of the Keras model to IR model conversion through the TF saved model and model optimiser.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Deployment procedure on NCS2 where the pre-processed data and IR model is fed to the inference engine and the results are acquired.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Conversion of a Keras model to a TF SavedModel through the various stages in the process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Inferencing procedure in Nvidia Jetson TX2 in which additional steps (green) were employed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Segmentation map obtained from the trained model.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop