Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (5,663)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = agricultural futures

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 2327 KiB  
Article
Assessment of 3-Cyanobenzoic Acid as a Possible Herbicide Candidate: Effects on Maize Growth and Photosynthesis
by Luiz Henryque Escher Grizza, Isabela de Carvalho Contesoto, Ana Paula da Silva Mendonça, Amanda Castro Comar, Ana Paula Boromelo, Ana Paula Ferro, Rodrigo Polimeni Constantin, Wanderley Dantas dos Santos, Rogério Marchiosi and Osvaldo Ferrarese-Filho
Plants 2025, 14(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010001 (registering DOI) - 24 Dec 2024
Abstract
Chemical weed control is a significant agricultural concern, and reliance on a limited range of herbicide action modes has increased resistant weed species, many of which use C4 metabolism. As a result, the identification of novel herbicidal agents with low toxicity targeting C4 [...] Read more.
Chemical weed control is a significant agricultural concern, and reliance on a limited range of herbicide action modes has increased resistant weed species, many of which use C4 metabolism. As a result, the identification of novel herbicidal agents with low toxicity targeting C4 plants becomes imperative. An assessment was conducted on the impact of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on the growth and photosynthetic processes of maize (Zea mays), a representative C4 plant, cultivated hydroponically over 14 days. The results showed a significant reduction in plant growth and notable disruptions in gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence due to the application of 3-cyanobenzoic acid, indicating compromised photosynthetic activity. Parameters such as the chlorophyll index, net assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), maximum effective photochemical efficiency (Fv′/Fm′), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), quantum yield of photosystem II photochemistry (ϕPSII), and electron transport rate through PSII (ETR) all decreased. The A/PAR curve revealed reductions in the maximum net assimilation rate (Amax) and apparent quantum yield (ϕ), alongside an increased light compensation point (LCP). Moreover, 3-cyanobenzoic acid significantly decreased the carboxylation rates of RuBisCo (Vcmax) and PEPCase (Vpmax), electron transport rate (J), and mesophilic conductance (gm). Overall, 3-cyanobenzoic acid induced substantial changes in plant growth, carboxylative processes, and photochemical activities. The treated plants also exhibited heightened susceptibility to intense light conditions, indicating a significant and potentially adverse impact on their physiological functions. These findings suggest that 3-cyanobenzoic acid or its analogs could be promising for future research targeting photosynthesis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Chemical Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Hydroponically grown maize plants treated with 3-cyanobenzoic acid for 14 days: 0 mM (<b>A</b>), 0.5 mM (<b>B</b>), and 1.0 mM (<b>C</b>). Scale bars represent 10 cm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on hydroponically grown maize plants for 14 days. Parameters measured include (<b>A</b>) chlorophyll content (SPAD index), (<b>B</b>) maximum quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>), (<b>C</b>) net assimilation (<span class="html-italic">A</span>), (<b>D</b>) stomatal conductance (<span class="html-italic">g</span><sub>s</sub>), (<b>E</b>) intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub>), (<b>F</b>) maximum efficiency of PSII (F<sub>v′</sub>/F<sub>m′</sub>), (<b>G</b>) non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), and (<b>H</b>) photochemical quenching (q<sub>P</sub>). Means values (n = 16–22 ± SEM) significantly different from the control are marked with * <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01, according to Dunnett’s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on hydroponically grown maize plants for 14 days on quantum yield of photosystem II photochemistry (ϕ<sub>PSII</sub>) (<b>A</b>) and electron transport rate through PSII (ETR) (<b>B</b>). Means (n = 22 ± SEM) marked with * or ** are statistically different from the control according to Dunnett’s test at 5% and 1% significance levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average net assimilation (<span class="html-italic">A</span>) curves in response to varying photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for maize plants grown hydroponically with 3-cyanobenzoic acid for 14 days. The initial linear region of the graph is magnified for clarity. Data are presented as mean values (n = 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on hydroponically grown maize plants after 14 days, focusing on parameters derived from the <span class="html-italic">A</span>/PAR curve: (<b>A</b>) net assimilation (<span class="html-italic">A</span><sub>max</sub>), (<b>B</b>) apparent quantum yield (ϕ), (<b>C</b>) light compensation point (LCP), and (<b>D</b>) dark respiration rate (<span class="html-italic">R</span><sub>D)</sub>. Means values (n = 3–4 ± SEM) significantly different from the control are marked with, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01, according to Dunnett’s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Average net assimilation (<span class="html-italic">A</span>) curves in response to varying intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub>) forma maize plants grown hydroponically with 3-cyanobenzoic acid for 14 days. Data are presented as mean values (n = 4–6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effects of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on maize plants grown hydroponically for 14 days, focusing on parameters derived from the <span class="html-italic">A</span>/<span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub> curve: (<b>A</b>) maximum carboxylation rate of RuBisCo (V<sub>cmax</sub>), (<b>B</b>) maximum carboxylation rate of PEPCase (V<sub>pmax</sub>), (<b>C</b>) rate of photosynthetic electron transport (<span class="html-italic">J</span>), and (<b>D</b>) mesophyll conductance (<span class="html-italic">g</span><sub>m</sub>). Means values (n = 4–6 ± SEM) significantly different from the control are marked with * <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01, according to Dunnett’s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Chlorophyll <span class="html-italic">a</span> fluorescence OJIP transient curves in maize plants grown hydroponically with 3-cyanobenzoic acid for 14 days. The OJIP curve represents key fluorescence intensities: the minimal fluorescence when all PSII reaction centers are open (O step), the intensity at 0.002 s (J step), the intensity at 0.03 s (I step), and the maximal fluorescence when all PSII reaction centers are closed (P step, at 0.3 s). Data are presented as means (n = 18 ± SEM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effects of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on specific energy flux parameters in hydroponically grown maize plants after 14 days of treatment. Parameters include: absorption flux per reaction center (ABS/RC), energy trapping per reaction center (TR<sub>0</sub>/RC), electron transport per reaction center (ET<sub>0</sub>/RC), energy dissipation per reaction center (DI<sub>0</sub>/RC), reaction center density per cross-sectional area (RC/CS), quantum yield of primary PSII photochemistry (TR<sub>0</sub>/ABS), efficiency with which a trapped electron is transferred from Q<sub>A</sub> to Q<sub>B</sub> (ET<sub>0</sub>/TR<sub>0</sub>), quantum yield of electron transport from Q<sub>A</sub> to Q<sub>B</sub> (ET<sub>0</sub>/ABS), and performance indices (PI<sub>ABS</sub> and PI<sub>Total</sub>). Data are presented as means (n = 18 ± SEM). Mean value significantly different from the control is marked with * <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, according to Dunnett’s test.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 1087 KiB  
Review
Challenges and Solutions for Small Dairy Farms in the U.S.: A Review
by Syed H. Jafri, K. M. Mehedi Adnan, Stefan Baimbill Johnson, Anzalin Ali Talukder, Mark Yu and Edward Osei
Agriculture 2024, 14(12), 2369; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122369 - 23 Dec 2024
Abstract
Small-sized dairy farms (SSDFs) are integral to the agricultural landscape, providing economic, social, and environmental benefits to rural communities. However, they face growing challenges, including market volatility, rising production costs, labor shortages, and complex regulatory demands. This review synthesizes the current literature on [...] Read more.
Small-sized dairy farms (SSDFs) are integral to the agricultural landscape, providing economic, social, and environmental benefits to rural communities. However, they face growing challenges, including market volatility, rising production costs, labor shortages, and complex regulatory demands. This review synthesizes the current literature on the economic and environmental obstacles confronting SSDFs and explores strategies to enhance their sustainability and competitiveness. Key barriers include limited access to capital, high feed and energy expenses, and difficulties in adopting new technologies due to financial constraints. SSDFs also struggle to compete with larger farms benefiting from economies of scale and increased market power. Potential solutions include strengthening cooperative models, implementing diversification strategies, and leveraging policy support for targeted financial assistance and technology adoption. Case studies of successful SSDFs show that transitioning to organic production, adopting climate-smart techniques, and focusing on niche markets can significantly improve profitability and resilience. This review emphasizes the need for tailored policy frameworks, innovative financial models, and collaboration among stakeholders to support SSDFs. Future research should prioritize understanding SSDF-specific financial dynamics, assessing the cost-effectiveness of technology adoption, and developing strategies to enhance market access and long-term sustainability in the U.S. dairy sector. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Economics, Policies and Rural Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>U.S. dairy operations (by size) trend. Source: USDA, Economic Research Services data, 2024 [<a href="#B4-agriculture-14-02369" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Per head milk production trend in the U.S. Source: USDA, Economic Research Services data, 2024 [<a href="#B4-agriculture-14-02369" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Total milk production trend in the U.S. Source: USDA, Economic Research Services data, 2024 [<a href="#B4-agriculture-14-02369" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Framework for resilient small-scale dairy operations in the U.S.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 3713 KiB  
Article
Pollution Problems in the Economic Agricultural Sector: Evaluating the Impact on Natural Resources and Solutions for Improvement
by Lubov Moldavan, Olena Pimenowa, Piotr Prus and Sergiusz Pimenow
Sustainability 2024, 16(24), 11294; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411294 - 23 Dec 2024
Abstract
In the face of modern global challenges and the growing impacts of anthropogenic activity, the issue of agricultural pollution of natural resources has become a critical issue, especially in countries experiencing ecological and social crises. Ukraine, as one of Europe’s largest agricultural producers, [...] Read more.
In the face of modern global challenges and the growing impacts of anthropogenic activity, the issue of agricultural pollution of natural resources has become a critical issue, especially in countries experiencing ecological and social crises. Ukraine, as one of Europe’s largest agricultural producers, faces unique challenges stemming from the legacy of radiation contamination following the Chornobyl nuclear disaster, intensive land use, and the environmental consequences of military conflict. Our study focuses on analyzing the sources of agricultural pollution, including chemical runoff, pesticides, herbicides, heavy metals, and nutrient leaching, as well as their impacts on the sustainability of agroecosystems, food security, and human well-being. The methodology is based on a systematic analysis of scientific research, agrochemical surveys, monitoring reports, and documents from governmental and non-governmental organizations. The assessment of natural resources was conducted using an integrated approach combining quantitative and qualitative pollution indicators. The results reveal an increasing threat to natural resources in Ukraine due to outdated technologies, radiation contamination, and military activities. Special attention is given to the need for a transition to agroecological farming methods and bioremediation for restoring contaminated lands and water resources. The study contributes to the development of sustainable approaches to managing natural resources and strategic measures to minimize agricultural pollution. The Ukrainian context underscores the relevance of research in countries with transitional economies and unique environmental challenges, making the findings significant for international scientific agendas and environmental policy. Future research perspectives include developing innovative technologies to prevent pollution and enhance the sustainability of agroecosystems to ecological challenges, as well as creating international resource management models based on Ukraine’s experience. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pollution Prevention, Mitigation and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Content of mobile Pb compounds in Ukrainian soils. Source: [<a href="#B16-sustainability-16-11294" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Content of mobile forms of Cd in Ukrainian soils. Source: [<a href="#B16-sustainability-16-11294" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Types of impacts on soil from hostilities and their consequences. Source: Developed by the authors with the use of [<a href="#B21-sustainability-16-11294" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B22-sustainability-16-11294" class="html-bibr">22</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Conventional anthropo-ecological risk assessment based on the total density of radiation contamination of the territory (conventional units). Source: [<a href="#B27-sustainability-16-11294" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Environmental status of the main river basins of Ukraine by pollutant content. Source: [<a href="#B47-sustainability-16-11294" class="html-bibr">47</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Annual average NO<sub>3</sub> concentrations in groundwater for the reporting period in EU countries. Source: [<a href="#B49-sustainability-16-11294" class="html-bibr">49</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions depending on the plowing depth in 24 h. Source: compiled by the author.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2829 KiB  
Review
Monitoring and Prediction of Land Surface Phenology Using Satellite Earth Observations—A Brief Review
by Mateo Gašparović, Ivan Pilaš, Dorijan Radočaj and Dino Dobrinić
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(24), 12020; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142412020 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 372
Abstract
Monitoring and predicting land surface phenology (LSP) are essential for understanding ecosystem dynamics, climate change impacts, and forest and agricultural productivity. Satellite Earth observation (EO) missions have played a crucial role in the advancement of LSP research, enabling global and continuous monitoring of [...] Read more.
Monitoring and predicting land surface phenology (LSP) are essential for understanding ecosystem dynamics, climate change impacts, and forest and agricultural productivity. Satellite Earth observation (EO) missions have played a crucial role in the advancement of LSP research, enabling global and continuous monitoring of vegetation cycles. This review provides a brief overview of key EO satellite missions, including the advanced very-high resolution radiometer (AVHRR), moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS), and the Landsat program, which have played an important role in capturing LSP dynamics at various spatial and temporal scales. Recent advancements in machine learning techniques have further enhanced LSP prediction capabilities, offering promising approaches for short-term prediction of vegetation phenology and cropland suitability assessment. Data cubes, which organize multidimensional EO data, provide an innovative framework for enhancing LSP analyses by integrating diverse data sources and simplifying data access and processing. This brief review highlights the potential of satellite-based monitoring, machine learning models, and data cube infrastructure for advancing LSP research and provides insights into current trends, challenges, and future directions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The number of land surface phenology indexed in Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) based on various global open Earth observation satellite missions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The number of cropland suitability studies indexed in Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) based on topic search of “vegetation phenology” and “machine learning”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The number of cropland suitability studies indexed in Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) based on topic search of “cropland suitability” or “agricultural land suitability”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Visual representation of the Earth observation data cube.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Time series values of soil moisture calculated in Euro DC using S1 backscatter data.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 5031 KiB  
Article
A Case of One Step Forward and Two Steps Back? An Examination of Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management Using a Simple Agroecosystem Dynamics Model
by Srinadh Kodali, Chris Flores-Lopez, Isabelle Lobdell, Branson Kim, James C. Russell, Lane Michna and Benjamin L. Turner
Systems 2024, 12(12), 587; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12120587 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 282
Abstract
Global herbicide-resistant weed populations continue rising due to selection pressures exerted by herbicides. Despite this, herbicides continue to be farmers’ preferred weed-control method due to cost and efficiency relative to physical or biological methods. However, weeds developing resistance to herbicides not only challenges [...] Read more.
Global herbicide-resistant weed populations continue rising due to selection pressures exerted by herbicides. Despite this, herbicides continue to be farmers’ preferred weed-control method due to cost and efficiency relative to physical or biological methods. However, weeds developing resistance to herbicides not only challenges crop production but also threatens ecosystem services by disrupting biodiversity, reducing soil health, and impacting water quality. Our objective was to develop a simulation model that captures the feedback between weed population dynamics, agricultural management, profitability, and farmer decision-making processes that interact in unique ways to reinforce herbicide resistance in weeds. After calibration to observed data and evaluation by subject matter experts, we tested alternative agronomic, mechanical, or intensive management strategies to evaluate their impact on weed population dynamics. Results indicated that standalone practices enhanced farm profitability in the short term but lead to substantial adverse ecological outcomes in the long term, indicated by elevated herbicide resistance (e.g., harm to non-target species, disrupting natural ecosystem functions). The most management-intensive test yielded the greatest weed control and farm profit, albeit with elevated residual resistant seed bank levels. We discuss these findings in both developed and developing-nation contexts. Future work requires greater connectivity of farm management and genetic-resistance models that currently remain disconnected mechanistically. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Systems Practice in Social Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Evolution of weed resistance and herbicide use over time: (<b>a</b>) global cases of resistance (data from Heap 2021 [<a href="#B5-systems-12-00587" class="html-bibr">5</a>]); (<b>b</b>) total pesticide use and the fraction of total applied as herbicide (dashed line); (<b>c</b>) the percentage of planted cropland acres in the United States treated with herbicide (data from Fernandez-Cornejo et al., 2014 [<a href="#B14-systems-12-00587" class="html-bibr">14</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Conceptual model illustrating the development of weed resistance to herbicide: (<b>time 1</b>) At time 1, treatment is applied that kills the majority of weeds present, but due to environmental forces that thwart application effectiveness (e.g., weather that disrupts proper application timing, lack for coverage, “drift” application, inherent weed resistance), (<b>time 2</b>) surviving weeds pass on resistant traits to seeds in the seed bank, which accumulate. (<b>time 3</b>) When farmers experience severe enough reductions in crop yield or quality, they may be led to “switch” herbicides. (<b>time 4</b>) Unfortunately, added selection pressure may lead to new pathways to resistant weed offspring, compounding the problem.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Conceptual causal loop diagram of the dynamic hypothesis (DH). Variables are connected via causal links to form feedback loops. Links with an ‘S’ sign on the arrowhead indicate same or positive polarity (the variable at the tail pushes the variable at the head in the same direction), while an ‘O‘ sign indicates opposite or negative polarity (the variable at the tail pushes the variable at the head in the opposite direction). Feedback loops are labeled ‘R’ for positive or reinforcing feedback, while those labeled ‘B’ indicate negative or balancing feedback. For example, when crop harvest increases, so does crop revenues; when farm profit increases, pressure on the farmer decreases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Agronomic test results, illustrating fraction of weed seed bank with resistance (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>g</b>), mean farm earnings (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>h</b>), and total number of switches (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>) (+/−1 standard deviation) in chemical herbicide treatment under pre-emergence (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), crop competition, (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>), and chemical herbicide diversification (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) strategies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mechanical test results, illustrating the mean fraction of weed seed with resistance, (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>g</b>), mean farm earnings (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>h</b>), and total number of switches (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>) (+/−1 standard deviation) due to weed management via seed crusher (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), combine cleaning (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>), and mowing, burning, and chaff removal (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) strategies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Educational and integrated test results, illustrating the mean fraction of weed seed with resistance (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>), mean farm earnings (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>), and total number of switches (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) (+/−1 standard deviation) under conditions of reduced management perception and decision-making delays (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and the integrated “many little hammers” test comprising five unique treatment combinations used simultaneously over time (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Synthesis of forces influencing weed pressure on farmers and the subsequent seed bank accumulation. Links with an “S” sign on the arrowhead indicate same or positive polarity (the variable at the tail pushes the variable at the head in the same direction) while an “O “sign indicates opposite or negative polarity (the variable at the tail pushes the variable at the head in the opposite direction). Feedback loops are labeled “R” for positive or reinforcing feedback, while those labeled “B” indicate negative or balancing feedback. For example, when weed pressure increases, so will herbicide treatments (the short-term “fix”), which in turn will reduce the subsequent weed pressure, but will increase selection pressure for resistant weed varieties, the fraction of weed seed expressing resistant traits, and the weed population resistant to herbicides (which is a case of a “fix that backfires”). A longer-term solution, interference in resource capture and reproducibility of weeds, becomes harder and harder to implement as the weed population resistant to herbicides drives up the percent soil cover and frequency of weed presence. This “shifts the burden” of management back to the short-term reliance on herbicide treatment in an attempt to curtail weed pressure, reinforcing the unintended side effects to weed resistance.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Conceptual stock-flow diagram of the weed-herbicide-resistance model. The notations “R” represent positive or reinforcing feedback processes while “B” represents negative or balancing feedback processes.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Model adequacy test results: exclusion of feedback responsible for erosion of effective chemical effectiveness (i.e., chemical switching and reduction in kill rate with subsequent weed resistance) such that effectiveness remained static at its initial condition (90% effective; <b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); (<b>c</b>) extreme conditions tests for the weed seed per unit of biomass and its effect on yield losses; (<b>d</b>) extreme conditions test for reduction in mean weed seed bank time or reduction in chemical half-life and their effects on fraction of weed seed resistance.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Model calibration results illustrating (<b>a</b>) similar model predicted behavior patterns to observed trends in farm net returns per acre [<a href="#B37-systems-12-00587" class="html-bibr">37</a>]; (<b>b</b>) fraction of weeds with resistance [<a href="#B40-systems-12-00587" class="html-bibr">40</a>]; (<b>c</b>) mean pounds pesticide applied per unit area [<a href="#B15-systems-12-00587" class="html-bibr">15</a>]; (<b>d</b>) herbicide cost per volume applied [<a href="#B37-systems-12-00587" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 4247 KiB  
Article
Temporal Vine Water Status Modeling Through Machine Learning Ensemble Technique and Sentinel-2 Multispectral Images Under Semi-Arid Conditions
by Vincenzo Giannico, Simone Pietro Garofalo, Luca Brillante, Pietro Sciusco, Mario Elia, Giuseppe Lopriore, Salvatore Camposeo, Raffaele Lafortezza, Giovanni Sanesi and Gaetano Alessandro Vivaldi
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4784; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244784 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 176
Abstract
New challenges will be experienced by the agriculture sector in the near future, especially due to the effects of climate change. For example, rising temperatures could result in increased evapotranspiration demand, causing difficulties in the management of irrigation practices. Generally, an important predictor [...] Read more.
New challenges will be experienced by the agriculture sector in the near future, especially due to the effects of climate change. For example, rising temperatures could result in increased evapotranspiration demand, causing difficulties in the management of irrigation practices. Generally, an important predictor of plant water status to be taken into account for irrigation monitoring and management is the stem water potential. However, it requires a huge amount of time-consuming fieldwork, particularly when an adequate data amount is necessary to fully investigate the spatial and temporal variability of large areas under monitoring. In this study, the integration of machine learning and satellite remote sensing (Sentinel-2) was investigated to obtain a model able to predict the stem water potential in viticulture using multispectral imagery. Vine water status data were acquired within a Montepulciano vineyard in the south of Italy (Puglia region), under semi-arid conditions; data were acquired over two years during the irrigation seasons. Different machine learning algorithms (lasso, ridge, elastic net, and random forest) were compared using vegetation indices and spectral bands as predictors in two independent analyses. The results show that it is possible to remotely estimate vine water status with random forest from vegetation indices (R2 = 0.72). Integrating machine learning techniques and satellite remote sensing could help farmers and technicians manage and plan irrigation, avoiding or reducing fieldwork. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the experimental vineyard in Italy (<b>a</b>), Sentinel-2 image of the plots where stem water potential values were acquired in 2019 and 2020 within the vineyard. Per each plot the reflectance value of the pixels was averaged (<b>b</b>), and Google Earth image of the vineyard (<b>c</b>). Google Earth Pro© and Sentinel-2 images©.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Workflow of the methodology used for predicting vine stem water potential (SWP) using Sentinel-2 data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Monthly trend of average temperature, amount of rainfall, and reference evapotranspiration calculated following the equation proposed by Hargreaves–Samani [<a href="#B44-remotesensing-16-04784" class="html-bibr">44</a>] for the two years of the experiment around the area of the vineyard.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Boxplot of stem water potential during the different phenological phases in the two years of the experiment (according to Lorenz et al. [<a href="#B45-remotesensing-16-04784" class="html-bibr">45</a>]); whiskers indicate maximum and minimum values, and the horizontal line within the boxplot represents the median.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatterplot of the predicted and the observed values (validation dataset) of stem water potential (ΨSTEM; MPa).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Optimization of random forest parameters for the models with S-2 bands (<b>a</b>) and the calculated VIs as predictors (<b>b</b>) (min node size; mtry and splitting rule).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Results of permutation procedure to assess variable importance of the models with S-2 bands (<b>a</b>) and the calculated VIs (<b>b</b>) as predictors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Daily rainfall in the area of the experiment and stem water potential in 2019 (<b>a</b>) and 2020 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Predictive maps of the vineyard stem water potential (ΨSTEM) produced by applying the RF-based model trained with vegetation indices as predictors to Sentinel-2 images. Maps are referred to 18 August 2019 (<b>a</b>) and 20 August 2019 (<b>b</b>). The 95% confidence intervals for ΨSTEM predictions ranged from −1.77 to −0.19 MPa; the plot of the 95% confidence interval for the RF model predictions (test set) is reported in <a href="#app1-remotesensing-16-04784" class="html-app">Supplementary Material</a> (<a href="#app1-remotesensing-16-04784" class="html-app">Figure S2</a>).</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 10017 KiB  
Article
Estimation of Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agricultural Sources and Characterization of Spatial and Temporal Changes in Anhui Province (China)
by Zhou Ye, Yujuan Sun, Xianglin Zhang and Youzhi Yao
Atmosphere 2024, 15(12), 1538; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121538 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 173
Abstract
To evaluate the estimation and spatiotemporal variation characteristics of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural sources in Anhui Province, the nitrous oxide emissions generated during crop cultivation and manure management were assessed based on the recommended methods in the “Guidelines for Provincial Greenhouse Gas [...] Read more.
To evaluate the estimation and spatiotemporal variation characteristics of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural sources in Anhui Province, the nitrous oxide emissions generated during crop cultivation and manure management were assessed based on the recommended methods in the “Guidelines for Provincial Greenhouse Gas Inventories” and official statistical data. The results showed that the overall emission of nitrous oxide from agricultural land showed a downward trend, reaching a valley value in 2019 with an emission of 2.83 × 104 tons. The annual average emissions of nitrous oxide from agricultural land and manure management account for 80.98% and 19.02% of the total annual average emissions of nitrous oxide from agricultural activities in Anhui Province, respectively. Both agricultural land emissions and livestock manure management show a trend of nitrous oxide emissions decreasing from the northern region of Anhui > central region of Anhui > southern region of Anhui. In this paper, we explored and discussed the intrinsic driving factors behind the spatiotemporal changes in nitrous oxide emissions, and analyzed the potential for future emission reductions. It is suggested that the emissions of nitrous oxide from agricultural sources can be reduced through measures such as reasonable nitrogen application, adjustment of aquaculture structures, and the improvement of manure treatment methods, providing a theoretical reference for the estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural sources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Air Quality)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Changes in the number of farmed animals: (<b>a</b>) for non-dairy cows (×10<sup>3</sup>), (<b>b</b>) for poultry (×10<sup>5</sup>), (<b>c</b>) for sheep (×10<sup>3</sup>), and (<b>d</b>) for pigs (×10<sup>5</sup>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mechanism diagram of nitrous oxide-emissions from agricultural sources [<a href="#B21-atmosphere-15-01538" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Historical changes in nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural activities in Anhui Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Annual emissions of nitrous oxide from agricultural land in Anhui Province.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Annual emissions of nitrous oxide from animal fecal management.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Statistical chart of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural land at some prefecture-level cities in Anhui Province (<b>a</b>) and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock and poultry manure management (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Contribution of animal manure management (<b>a</b>) and agricultural land (<b>b</b>) to nitrous oxide emissions in some prefecture-level cities of Anhui Province in 2014 and 2022.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7057 KiB  
Review
Sustainable Agriculture Through Agricultural Waste Management: A Comprehensive Review of Composting’s Impact on Soil Health in Moroccan Agricultural Ecosystems
by Majda Oueld Lhaj, Rachid Moussadek, Abdelmjid Zouahri, Hatim Sanad, Laila Saafadi, Meriem Mdarhri Alaoui and Latifa Mouhir
Agriculture 2024, 14(12), 2356; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122356 - 21 Dec 2024
Viewed by 587
Abstract
Agricultural activities generate substantial quantities of waste, which are often relegated to landfills or incineration. However, these residues can be effectively valorized through composting, which transforms them into valuable organic fertilizers (OF). Composting agricultural waste (AW) mitigates environmental impacts and offers significant benefits [...] Read more.
Agricultural activities generate substantial quantities of waste, which are often relegated to landfills or incineration. However, these residues can be effectively valorized through composting, which transforms them into valuable organic fertilizers (OF). Composting agricultural waste (AW) mitigates environmental impacts and offers significant benefits in enhancing soil fertility and productivity. This practice is particularly beneficial in regions with low soil fertility and degraded land, where compost can improve soil health and productivity. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the literature on the valorization of AW through composting, focusing on its environmental, agricultural, and economic impacts on soil health, especially in Morocco’s agricultural ecosystems. It synthesizes findings from studies published over the past two decades to offer critical insights and recommendations for optimizing composting practices. By systematically evaluating, this review highlights composting as a pivotal strategy for enhancing soil health, reducing environmental impact, and promoting sustainable AW management. Future research is essential to explore opportunities for optimizing the composting process, including content enhancement and processing duration. In summary, the composting process can be seen as an effective and sustainable solution that fits within the principles of circular economy (CE) and that requires careful evaluation and ongoing monitoring. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Spatial distribution of chosen publication on the topic of composting across the world.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Visual network representation of keywords derived from VOSviewer analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Density visualization map illustrating the distribution of keywords generated by VOSviewer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Visualization of temporal analysis of keyword patterns in VOSviewer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Illustration of compost impact on soil and environmental parameters.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 8016 KiB  
Article
Revealing Climate-Induced Patterns in Crop Yields and the Water-Energy-Food-Carbon Nexus: Insights from the Pearl River Basin
by Changxin Ye, Ze Yuan, Xiaohong Chen, Ruida Zhong and Lie Huang
Water 2024, 16(24), 3693; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243693 - 21 Dec 2024
Viewed by 298
Abstract
In the context of growing concerns over food security and climate change, research on sustainable agricultural development increasingly emphasizes the interconnections within agricultural systems. This study developed a regionally integrated optimization and prediction agricultural model to systematically analyze the impacts of climate change [...] Read more.
In the context of growing concerns over food security and climate change, research on sustainable agricultural development increasingly emphasizes the interconnections within agricultural systems. This study developed a regionally integrated optimization and prediction agricultural model to systematically analyze the impacts of climate change on agricultural systems and their feedback mechanisms from a water-energy-food-carbon (WEFC) nexus perspective. Applied to the Pearl River Basin, the model evaluates future trends in grain yield, water use, energy consumption, and carbon emissions under various climate scenarios throughout this century. The results indicate that rising temperatures significantly reduce crop yields, particularly in the western basin, increasing the environmental footprint per unit of grain produced. However, the CO2 fertilization effect substantially offsets these negative impacts. Under the SSP585 scenario, CO2 concentrations rising from 599.77 ppm to 1135.21 ppm by the century’s end led to a shift in crop yield trends from negative (Z = −7.03) to positive (Z = 11.01). This also reduces water, energy, and carbon footprints by 12.82%, 10.62%, and 10.59%, respectively. These findings highlight the critical importance of adaptive management strategies, including precision irrigation, optimized fertilizer use, and climate-resilient practices, to ensure sustainable agricultural production. Despite these insights, the model has limitations. Future research should incorporate uncertainty analysis, diverse adaptation pathways, and advanced technologies such as machine learning and remote sensing to improve predictive accuracy and applicability. This study offers valuable guidance for mitigating the adverse impacts of climate change on the WEFC nexus, supporting sustainable agricultural practices and science-based policy development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Water-Land-Plant System Engineering)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Overview of IOPAM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Performance of the calibrated AquaCrop model in simulating rice and maize yields in the Pearl River Basin: (<b>a</b>) simulation accuracy of IOPAM, (<b>b</b>) spatial distribution of error metrics, and (<b>c</b>) planting and growth duration variability of three crops.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of machine learning models in predicting sowing dates and SHAP analysis of key features for rice and maize in the Pearl River Basin: (<b>a</b>) model performance comparison and (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) the impact of different features on sowing date predictions for various crops.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Baseline precipitation and projected change rates under different SSP scenarios. The periods are defined as follows: the 2030s represent the average values from 2020 to 2040, the 2050s represent the average values from 2040 to 2060, the 2070s represent the average values from 2060 to 2080, and the 2090s represent the average values from 2080 to 2100.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Projected trends of yield, irrigation, energy use, and GHG emissions under different CO<sub>2</sub> concentration scenarios for the Pearl River Basin. This figure compares the projections of these key variables under ISIMIP3b CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and default CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in AquaCrop across different SSP scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of WEFC nexus trends for three crops under different SSP scenarios. This figure is based on CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations from the ISIMIP3b dataset. The trends are represented using the Zc values from the Mann–Kendall test, indicating the significance and direction of the trends from 2000 to 2100.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 17376 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Future Drought Risk and Wheat Meteorological Disaster in Ningxia (Northwest China) Based on CMIP6 and SPEI
by Xinlong Li, Junli Tan, Xina Wang, Qian Shang, Hao Li and Xuefang Li
Agronomy 2024, 14(12), 3051; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14123051 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 278
Abstract
In arid areas, droughts caused by climate change seriously impact wheat production. Therefore, research on spatial and temporal variability of dry and hot wind events and drought risk under different development patterns of future climate can provide a reference for wheat cultivation planning [...] Read more.
In arid areas, droughts caused by climate change seriously impact wheat production. Therefore, research on spatial and temporal variability of dry and hot wind events and drought risk under different development patterns of future climate can provide a reference for wheat cultivation planning in the study area. Based on meteorological data under three scenarios of the CMIP6 (Sixth International Coupled Model Comparison Program) shared socio-economic path (SSP), we introduced wheat dry hot wind discrimination criteria and calculated the Standardized Precipitation–Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI). Future temperature changes within the Ningxia Province were consistent, increasing at a rate of 0.037, 0.15 and 0.45 °C·(10 a−1) under SSP126, 245 and 585 scenarios, respectively. Simultaneously, average annual precipitation would increase by 17.77, 38.73 and 32.12 mm, respectively. Dry hot wind frequency differed spatially, being higher in northern Ningxia and western Ningxia, and lower in southern Ningxia and eastern Ningxia. During the wheat growing period, there is an obvious increasing drought risk trend under the SSP585 model in May, and the possibility of drought risk in the middle period was highest under the SSP126 model. In June, SPEI was generally higher than in May, and the risk of alternating drought and flood was greater under the SSP585 model, while near-medium drought risk was lower under the SSP126 and SSP245 models. The influence of DHW (dry and hot wind) on wheat yield will increase with the increase of warming level. However, when DHW occurs, effective irrigation can mitigate the harm. Irrigation water can be sourced from various channels, including rainfall, diversion, and groundwater. These results provide scientific reference for sustainable agricultural production, drought risk and wheat meteorological disaster forecast in inland arid areas affected by climate change. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location, agro-ecological area distribution and DEM elevation of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Monthly average temperature, precipitation and evaporation of each test site in the study area under SSP126, 245 and 585 models. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>L</b>) represent 12 test sites in Guyuan, Haiyuan, Huianbao, Huinong, Litong, Shizuishan, Tongxin, Xiji, Yanchi, Yinchuan, Zhongning and Zhongwei, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Monthly average temperature, precipitation and evaporation of each test site in the study area under SSP126, 245 and 585 models. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>L</b>) represent 12 test sites in Guyuan, Haiyuan, Huianbao, Huinong, Litong, Shizuishan, Tongxin, Xiji, Yanchi, Yinchuan, Zhongning and Zhongwei, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Future DHW days during wheat growth period under SSP126, 245 and 585 models were studied at 12 representative test sites. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>L</b>) represent 12 test sites in Guyuan, Haiyuan, Huianbao, Huinong, Litong, Shizuishan, Tongxin, Xiji, Yanchi, Yinchuan, Zhongning and Zhongwei, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Future DHW days during wheat growth period under SSP126, 245 and 585 models were studied at 12 representative test sites. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>L</b>) represent 12 test sites in Guyuan, Haiyuan, Huianbao, Huinong, Litong, Shizuishan, Tongxin, Xiji, Yanchi, Yinchuan, Zhongning and Zhongwei, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The variation trend of future DHW days in wheat growing period under SSP126, 245 and 585 models at each test site. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>L</b>) represent 12 test sites in Guyuan, Haiyuan, Huianbao, Huinong, Litong, Shizuishan, Tongxin, Xiji, Yanchi, Yinchuan, Zhongning and Zhongwei, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The variation trend of future DHW days in wheat growing period under SSP126, 245 and 585 models in the study area. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) represent the short-, medium- and long-term DHW average annual number of days under SSP126 model; (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) are under SSP245 model; (<b>G</b>–<b>I</b>) are under SSP585 model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes of SPEI index in May under three future climate models. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>L</b>) represent 12 test sites in Guyuan, Haiyuan, Huianbao, Huinong, Litong, Shizuishan, Tongxin, Xiji, Yanchi, Yinchuan, Zhongning and Zhongwei, respectively. The above, middle and below figures show the changes of SPEI values in May, June and July, respectively. The blue, green and red lines represent the changes of the SPEI index under SSP126, SSP245 and SSP585 scenarios respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Changes of SPEI index in June under three future climate models. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>L</b>) represent 12 test sites in Guyuan, Haiyuan, Huianbao, Huinong, Litong, Shizuishan, Tongxin, Xiji, Yanchi, Yinchuan, Zhongning and Zhongwei, respectively. The above, middle and below figures show the changes of SPEI values in May, June and July, respectively. The blue, green and red lines represent the changes of the SPEI index under SSP126, SSP245 and SSP585 scenarios respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Changes of SPEI index in July under three future climate models. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>L</b>) represent 12 test sites in Guyuan, Haiyuan, Huianbao, Huinong, Litong, Shizuishan, Tongxin, Xiji, Yanchi, Yinchuan, Zhongning and Zhongwei, respectively. The above, middle and below figures show the changes of SPEI values in May, June and July, respectively. The blue, green and red lines represent the changes of the SPEI index under SSP126, SSP245 and SSP585 scenarios respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The SPEI index of May in the near to mid future under three climate change models in the study area. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) represent the average annual distribution of SPEI index in the near- to middle- and long-term under the SSP126 model; (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) represent the average annual distribution of SPEI index in the near- and long-term under the SSP245 model, respectively; and (<b>G</b>–<b>I</b>) represent the average annual distribution of SPEI index under the SSP585 model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The SPEI index of June in the near- to mid-future under three climate change models in the study area. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) represent the average annual distribution of SPEI index in the near- to middle- and long-term under the SSP126 model; (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) represent the average annual distribution of SPEI index in the near- and long-term under the SSP245 model, respectively; and (<b>G</b>–<b>I</b>) represent the average annual distribution of SPEI index under the SSP585 model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The SPEI index of July in the near- to mid-future under three climate change models in the study area. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) represent the average annual distribution of SPEI index in the near- to middle- and long-term under the SSP126 model; (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) represent the average annual distribution of SPEI index in the near- and long-term under the SSP245 model, respectively; and (<b>G</b>–<b>I</b>) represent the average annual distribution of SPEI index under the SSP585 model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Pearson correlation analysis of SPEI index in May, June and July, DHW quantity in wheat growth period and four simulation results of wheat. Note: (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) represent the three development modes of SSP126, 245 and 585. * and ** indicating significant differences at the <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>SPEI classification frequency. Note: SPEI ≤ −2.00 extreme drought, −1.50 &lt; SPEI ≤ −2.00 severe drought, −1.00 &lt; SPEI ≤ −1.50 moderate drought, −0.50 &lt; SPEI ≤ −1.00 mild drought, −0.50 ≤ SPEI ≤ 0.50 normal, 0.50 &lt; SPEI ≤ 1.00 wet, 1.00 &lt; SPEI ≤ 1.50 moderately wet, SPEI &gt; 1.50 Extremely wet.</p>
Full article ">
45 pages, 2240 KiB  
Review
Microalgal Bioeconomy: A Green Economy Approach Towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals
by Nilay Kumar Sarker and Prasad Kaparaju
Sustainability 2024, 16(24), 11218; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411218 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 333
Abstract
This article delves into the role of microalgae in advancing a green economy, thereby contributing to the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Microalgae, as sustainable resources, offer multifaceted benefits across various sectors, including aquaculture, agriculture, food and feed, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, wastewater treatment, [...] Read more.
This article delves into the role of microalgae in advancing a green economy, thereby contributing to the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Microalgae, as sustainable resources, offer multifaceted benefits across various sectors, including aquaculture, agriculture, food and feed, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, wastewater treatment, and carbon sequestration. This review highlights the versatility of microalgae in producing biofuels, high-value bioactive compounds, and bioremediation processes. It examines the technical viability and environmental sustainability of microalgae cultivation, emphasizing its low carbon footprint and resource efficiency. This article also explores the integration of microalgae into existing industrial processes, illustrating their potential to mitigate climate change, promote biodiversity, and enhance resource circularity. Challenges such as scalability, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory frameworks are discussed alongside the prospects for technological innovations and policy support to bolster the microalgae industry. By harnessing the potential of microalgae, this article underscores a pathway towards a more sustainable and greener future, aligning with the global agenda for sustainable development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy: The Path to a Low-Carbon Economy)
32 pages, 2477 KiB  
Review
Polyphenols and Microbiota Modulation: Insights from Swine and Other Animal Models for Human Therapeutic Strategies
by Andrei Cristian Anghel, Ionelia Țăranu, Alina Orțan, Simona Marcu Spinu, Mihaela Dragoi Cudalbeanu, Petronela Mihaela Rosu and Narcisa Elena Băbeanu
Molecules 2024, 29(24), 6026; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29246026 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 541
Abstract
High consumption of ultra-processed foods, rich in sugar and unhealthy fats, has been linked to the onset of numerous chronic diseases. Consequently, there has been a growing shift towards a fiber-rich diet, abundant in fruits, vegetables, seeds, and nuts, to enhance longevity and [...] Read more.
High consumption of ultra-processed foods, rich in sugar and unhealthy fats, has been linked to the onset of numerous chronic diseases. Consequently, there has been a growing shift towards a fiber-rich diet, abundant in fruits, vegetables, seeds, and nuts, to enhance longevity and quality of life. The primary bioactive components in these plant-based foods are polyphenols, which exert significant effects on modulating the gastrointestinal microbiota through their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. This modulation has preventive effects on neurodegenerative, metabolic, and cardiovascular diseases, and even cancer. The antimicrobial properties of polyphenols against pathogenic bacteria have significantly reduced the need for antibiotics, thereby lowering the risk of antibiotic resistance. This paper advances the field by offering novel insights into the beneficial effects of polyphenols, both directly through the metabolites produced during digestion and indirectly through changes in the host’s gastrointestinal microbiota, uniquely emphasizing swine as a model highly relevant to human health, a topic that, to our knowledge, has not been thoroughly explored in previous reviews. This review also addresses aspects related to both other animal models (mice, rabbits, and rats), and humans, providing guidelines for future research into the benefits of polyphenol consumption. By linking agricultural and biomedical perspectives, it proposes strategies for utilizing these bioactive compounds as therapeutic agents in both veterinary and human health sciences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Phenolic and Polyphenolic Compounds, Volume III)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagram of the article selection process cited in this review.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Beneficial effects of polyphenols in mice, rabbits, rats, and humans.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Hydrolysis of isoflavones into daidzein.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Metabolization of lignans into enterolignans.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Metabolization of resveratrol into lunularin.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 4090 KiB  
Article
Living Lab for the Diffusion of Enabling Technologies in Agriculture: The Case of Sicily in the Mediterranean Context
by Giuseppe Timpanaro, Vera Teresa Foti, Giulio Cascone, Manuela Trovato, Alessandro Grasso and Gabriella Vindigni
Agriculture 2024, 14(12), 2347; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122347 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 212
Abstract
Enabling technologies (KETs) offer transformative potential for agriculture by addressing major challenges such as climate change, resource efficiency, and sustainable development across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. However, KET adoption is often limited by high R&D requirements, rapid innovation cycles, investment costs, and [...] Read more.
Enabling technologies (KETs) offer transformative potential for agriculture by addressing major challenges such as climate change, resource efficiency, and sustainable development across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. However, KET adoption is often limited by high R&D requirements, rapid innovation cycles, investment costs, and cultural or training barriers, especially among small agricultural businesses. Sicily’s agricultural sector, already strained by pandemic-related economic setbacks and inflationary pressures, faces additional barriers in adopting these technologies. To investigate these adoption challenges and develop viable solutions, the ARIA Living Lab (Agritech Research Innovation Environment) was established within the PNRR framework. A qualitative approach was used, involving documentary analysis and data from stakeholders across Sicilian agriculture. This approach enabled an in-depth exploration of sector-specific needs, infrastructure, and socio-economic factors influencing KET adoption. The analysis highlighted that adoption barriers differ significantly across sectors (citrus, olive, and wine), with public incentives and digital infrastructure playing key roles. However, a persistent lack of technical skills among farmers reduces the effectiveness of these innovations. The findings suggest that an integrated approach—combining targeted incentives, training, and enhanced infrastructure—is essential for a sustainable transition to KETs. Future research should examine collaborative efforts between farms and tech providers and evaluate the impact of public policies in promoting the widespread, informed adoption of enabling technologies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Areas of innovation in which investments have been made in Sicily and the incidence (%) in the whole of Italy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Types of stakeholders involved in ARIA Living Lab activities (2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Moments from the Living Lab ARIA activities (2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Stakeholders involved in the ARIA Living Lab by origin (2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Innovations introduced in agriculture in the last three years, by main type (2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Type of enabling technology known to the stakeholders involved in the ARIA Living Lab (2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Perceived usefulness of enabling technology adoption in agriculture by ARIA Living Lab stakeholders (2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Perceived risks of enabling technology adoption in agriculture by ARIA Living Lab stakeholders (2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Cause and effect analysis in the Ishikawa diagram on the adoption of enabling technologies in agriculture (2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Causal map on the adoption of KETs in agriculture in Sicily (2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Evaluation of the relative importance of business model canvas items for three key sectors of Sicilian agriculture: citrus, wine, and olive growing (2024).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2355 KiB  
Article
Transforming Soil: Climate-Smart Amendments Boost Soil Physical and Hydrological Properties
by Anoop Valiya Veettil, Atikur Rahman, Ripendra Awal, Ali Fares, Nigus Demelash Melaku, Binita Thapa, Almoutaz Elhassan and Selamawit Woldesenbet
Soil Syst. 2024, 8(4), 134; https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8040134 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 300
Abstract
A field study was conducted to investigate the effects of selected climate-smart agriculture practices on soil bulk density (ρ), porosity (β), hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), and nutrient dynamics in southeast Texas. Treatment combinations of two types of [...] Read more.
A field study was conducted to investigate the effects of selected climate-smart agriculture practices on soil bulk density (ρ), porosity (β), hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), and nutrient dynamics in southeast Texas. Treatment combinations of two types of organic manure (chicken and dairy) with three rates (0, 224, and 448 kg N ha−1) and two levels of biochar (2500 and 5000 kg ha−1) were used in a factorial randomized block design. Bulk density and porosity measurements were conducted on undisturbed soil core samples collected from the topsoil (0–10 cm) of a field cultivated with sweet corn. Ksat was calculated from the steady-state infiltration measured using the Tension Infiltrometer (TI). The ANOVA results indicated that the manure application rates, and biochar levels significantly affected the soil properties. Compared to the control, β increased by 15% and 29% for the recommended and double recommended manure rates. Similarly, hydraulic conductivity increased by 25% in the double-recommended rate plots compared to the control. Also, we applied the concept of non-parametric elasticity to understand the sensitivity of soil physical and chemical properties to Ksat. ρ and β are critical physical properties that are highly sensitive to Ksat. Among soil nutrients, Boron showed the highest sensitivity to Ksat. Hydraulic conductivity can be enhanced by employing selected climate-smart practices and improving water management. Future directions for this study focus on scaling these findings to diverse cropping systems and soil types while integrating long-term assessments to evaluate the cumulative effects of climate-smart practices on soil health, crop productivity, and ecosystem sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Soil Management and Conservation: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The experimental plots are located at Prairie View A&amp;M University, Waller County, Texas. The plots’ layout includes representations of treatment types and treatment rates. The green plots represent the organic amendment with chicken manure, the blue represents dairy, and the white are control plots without any amendments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Box plot showing the distribution of (<b>a</b>) bulk density (g cm<sup>−3</sup>), (<b>b</b>) porosity (%), and (<b>c</b>) hydraulic conductivity (<span class="html-italic">K<sub>sat</sub></span>; cm hr<sup>−1</sup>) with the replications (blocks), manure type, application rates, and biochar levels. Type 1: Chicken, Type 2: Dairy, Rate 1: Control, Rate 2: Recommended, Rate 3: Double-recommended, Biochar 1: Level 1, Biochar 2: Level 2. The box represents the Inter Quartile Range (IQR). The lower edge of the box represents the 25th percentile, the upper edge of the box represents the 75th percentile, and the line inside the box represents the median (50th percentile) of the data. Lines extending from the box show the range of the data, excluding outliers, and the individual dots indicate the outliers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of (<b>a</b>) manure rates and (<b>b</b>) biochar levels on bulk density, BD (g cm<sup>−3</sup>). (<b>c</b>) Interaction between manure types and rates on bulk density (g cm<sup>−3</sup>). The <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis label represents the ‘type’ first and ‘rate’ second. For example, 2.3, 2 is the type, and 3 is the rate. Note: The same letter in the figure indicates no significant difference among means by least significant difference (LSD) comparison of means at α = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effect of (<b>a</b>) manure rates and (<b>b</b>) biochar levels on porosity (%). (<b>c</b>) Interaction between manure rates and biochar levels on porosity. The <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis label represents the ‘rate’ first and ‘biochar level’ second. The same letter in the figure indicates no significant difference among means by least significant difference (LSD) comparison of means at α = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of (<b>a</b>) replications and (<b>b</b>) manure rates, and (<b>c</b>) biochar levels on saturated hydraulic conductivity (<span class="html-italic">K<sub>sat</sub></span>). The same letter in the figure indicates no significant difference among means by least significant difference (LSD) comparison of means at α = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The correlation matrix shows the Pearson correlation between all the soil physical and chemical parameters. Pearson correlation values are only visible if the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value is less than 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sensitivity of hydraulic conductivity with the selected soil’s physical and chemical parameters.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3640 KiB  
Article
Growth Parameters, Yield and Grain Quality of Different Winter Wheat Cultivars Using Strip Tillage in Relation to the Intensity of Post-Harvest Soil Cultivation
by Marcin Różewicz, Jerzy Grabiński and Marta Wyzińska
Agriculture 2024, 14(12), 2345; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122345 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 199
Abstract
The research has been undertaken to determine whether it is worthwhile to do a post-tillage on stubble before applying strip-till or whether tillage operations such as tillage and stubble ploughing should be performed. Therefore, ploughed tillage + strip tillage (PT), stubble discing + [...] Read more.
The research has been undertaken to determine whether it is worthwhile to do a post-tillage on stubble before applying strip-till or whether tillage operations such as tillage and stubble ploughing should be performed. Therefore, ploughed tillage + strip tillage (PT), stubble discing + strip tillage (SD) and strip tillage (ST) operations were evaluated on three genetically distant winter wheat cultivars, including Formacja, Metronom and Desamo. A three-year field experiment was conducted from 2018 to 2021 at the Agricultural Experimental Station Kepa-Osiny in Pulawy, Poland. The experiment design was a split-block design with four repetitions of every treatment. The results showed that the cultivars differed in dry matter growth. However, no differences were found between the cultivar and post-harvest tillage method in terms of dry matter, plant height, and flag leaf area. Grain yield per ear was the main factor of yield variation across the cultivar and tillage systems. The extent of tillage only in the case of previously performed ploughing had an effect on the thousand grain weight. On the other hand, the omission of post-harvest tillage (ST) had a positive effect on the sedimentation index value. In terms of wheat grain yield, plough tillage (PT) proved to be the most advantageous, while reducing the intensity of tillage caused a systematic decrease in yield by 6% in the SD treatment and 9% in the ST treatment, respectively. Other quality parameters (gluten quantity, gluten index, falling number) did not depend on the applied tillage range. The response of cultivars to the applied cultivation methods was generally similar. Due to the beneficial effect of reducing the scope of cultivation on the environment, a small reduction in yield and no negative impact on the quality characteristics of grain, it is recommended to use strip-till cultivation without prior post-harvest cultivation. The results provide new insights into the growth of different winter wheat cultivars and the postharvest tillage applied, and they can be used in the future to validate existing wheat growth models. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Characteristics of treatments using different post-harvest cultivation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Characteristics of the cultivars used in the research.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Plan of the applied experiment and combination of factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Characteristics of the physicochemical properties of soil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Agricultural technology and fertilisation used in the conducted research.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop