Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 647 KiB  
Article
Anchor-Based Method for Inter-Domain Mobility Management in Software-Defined Networking
by Akichy Adon Jean Rodrigue Kanda, Amanvon Ferdinand Atta, Zacrada Françoise Odile Trey, Michel Babri and Ahmed Dooguy Kora
Algorithms 2024, 17(12), 566; https://doi.org/10.3390/a17120566 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 609
Abstract
Recently, there has been an explosive growth in wireless devices capable of connecting to the Internet and utilizing various services anytime, anywhere, often while on the move. In the realm of the Internet, such devices are called mobile nodes. When these devices are [...] Read more.
Recently, there has been an explosive growth in wireless devices capable of connecting to the Internet and utilizing various services anytime, anywhere, often while on the move. In the realm of the Internet, such devices are called mobile nodes. When these devices are in motion or traverse different domains while communicating, effective mobility management becomes essential to ensure the continuity of their services. Software-defined networking (SDN), a new paradigm in networking, offers numerous possibilities for addressing the challenges of mobility management. By decoupling the control and data planes, SDN enables greater flexibility and adaptability, making them a powerful framework for solving mobility-related issues. However, communication can still be momentarily disrupted due to frequent changes in IP addresses, a drop in radio signals, or configuration issues associated with gateways. Therefore, this paper introduces Routage Inter-domains in SDN (RI-SDN), a novel anchor-based routing method designed for inter-domain mobility in SDN architectures. The method identifies a suitable anchor domain, a critical intermediary domain that contributes to reducing delays during data transfer because it is the closest domain (i.e., node) to the destination. Once the anchor domain is identified, the best routing path is determined as the route with the smallest metric, incorporating elements such as bandwidth, flow operations, and the number of domain hops. Simulation results demonstrate significant improvements in data transfer delay and handover latency compared to existing methods. By leveraging SDN’s potential, RI-SDN presents a robust and innovative solution for real-world scenarios requiring reliable mobility management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Algorithms for Multidisciplinary Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Algorithm for anchor domain selection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Algorithm for route selection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Basic architecture, from [<a href="#B19-algorithms-17-00566" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Basic simplified architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Adjacency matrix.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Architecture with routes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Architecture 2 × 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Architecture 3 × 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Architecture 3 × 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Architecture 3 × 5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Data transfer delay.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Handover latency.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2179 KiB  
Article
A Service-Efficient Proxy Mobile IPv6 Extension for IoT Domain
by Habib Ullah Khan, Anwar Hussain, Shah Nazir, Farhad Ali, Muhammad Zubair Khan and Inam Ullah
Information 2023, 14(8), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/info14080459 - 14 Aug 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2355
Abstract
The upcoming generation of communications can provide richer mobility, high data rate, reliable security, better quality of services, and supporting mobility requirements in the Internet of Things (IoT) environment. Integrating modern communication with IoT demands more secure, scalable, and resource-efficient mobility solutions for [...] Read more.
The upcoming generation of communications can provide richer mobility, high data rate, reliable security, better quality of services, and supporting mobility requirements in the Internet of Things (IoT) environment. Integrating modern communication with IoT demands more secure, scalable, and resource-efficient mobility solutions for better business opportunities. In a massive 6G-enabled IoT environment, modern mobility solutions such as proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) have the potential to provide enhanced mobility and resource efficiency. For supporting richer mobility, a cost-effective and resource-efficient mobility solution is required in a massive 6G-enabled IoT environment. The main objective of the presented study is to provide a resource-friendly mobility solution for supporting the effective integration of future communication in the massive IoT domain. In that context, a location-based, resource-efficient PMIPv6 extension protocol is proposed to provide resource efficiency in terms of required signaling, packet loss, and handover latency. To compare and analyze the proposed model’s effectiveness, mathematical equations are derived for the existing as well as for the proposed solution, and such equations are implemented. Based on the comparison among existing and proposed solutions, the results show that the proposed location-based service-oriented proxy mobile IPv6 extension is resource efficient for supporting mobility in 6G-enabled IoT. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Working and signaling procedure of Loc-PMIPv6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparing signaling among proposed and non-location-based extensions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Signaling comparison among proposed and location-based extensions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Signaling comparison among proposed and non-location-based schemes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Signaling comparison among proposed and location-based schemes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparing handover latency among processed and non-location-based schemes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparing handover latency among processed and location-based schemes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Buffering comparison among processed and non-location-based schemes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparing buffering among processed and location-based schemes.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4028 KiB  
Article
A Novel Handover Mechanism of PMIPv6 for the Support of Multi-Homing Based on Virtual Interface
by Indumathi Lakshmi Krishnan, Fadi Al-Turjman, Ramesh Sekaran, Rizwan Patan and Ching-Hsien Hsu
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11743; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111743 - 24 Oct 2021
Viewed by 2154
Abstract
The Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is a network-based accessibility managing protocol. Because of PMIPv6’s network-based approach, it accumulates the following additional benefits, such as discovery, efficiency. Nonetheless, PMIPv6 has inadequate sustenance for multi-homing mechanisms, since every mobility session must be handled through a [...] Read more.
The Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is a network-based accessibility managing protocol. Because of PMIPv6’s network-based approach, it accumulates the following additional benefits, such as discovery, efficiency. Nonetheless, PMIPv6 has inadequate sustenance for multi-homing mechanisms, since every mobility session must be handled through a different binding cache entry (BCE) at a local mobility anchor (LMA) according to the PMIPv6 specification, and thus PMIPv6 merely permits concurrent admittance for the mobile node (MN) which is present in the multi-homing concept. Consequently, when a multi-homed MN interface is detached from its admittance network, the LMA removes its moving part from the BCE, and the current flows connected with the apart interface are not transmitted to the multi-homed MN, even if a more multi-homed MN interface is still linked to another access network. A superior multi-homing support proposal is proposed to afford flawless mobility among the interfaces for a multi-homed MN to address this problem. The projected method can shift an application from a disconnected interface of a multi-home MN to an attached interface using the PMIPv6 fields of Auxiliary Advertisement of Neighbor Detection (AAND). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Network’s general multi-homing configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Virtual interface maintained for different technologies of access.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Limitation of Single virtual Interface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>PMIPv6/AAND—Handover Initiate Message Format [<a href="#B9-sustainability-13-11743" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>PMIPv6/ AAND—Handover Acknowledgement Message Format [<a href="#B9-sustainability-13-11743" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>PMIPv6/AAND—Architecture with Multiple Virtual Interface Technology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Topology 1—Multi-Homing of PMIPv6/AAND.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Topology 2—Multi-Homing of PMIPv6/AAND.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Topology 3—Multi-Homing of PMIPv6/AAND.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>PMIPv6/AAND signal flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>PMIPv6/AAND—Simulation Topology [<a href="#B9-sustainability-13-11743" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>PMIPv6/AAND—support for Multiple Virtual Interface [<a href="#B9-sustainability-13-11743" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>MIPv6—Handover Simulation Result [<a href="#B9-sustainability-13-11743" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>PMIPv6-Handover Simulation Result [<a href="#B9-sustainability-13-11743" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>PMIPv6/F-PMIPv6—Handover Simulation result [<a href="#B9-sustainability-13-11743" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>PMIPv6/SAND—Handover Simulation result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>PMIPv6/AAND—Handover Simulation Result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>PMIPv6/AAND—Handover comparative analysis (based on packet transfer).</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 715 KiB  
Article
An Efficient Group-Based Control Signalling within Proxy Mobile IPv6 Protocol
by Safwan M. Ghaleb, Shamala Subramaniam, Mukhtar Ghaleb and Ali Mohamed E. Ejmaa
Computers 2019, 8(4), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/computers8040075 - 4 Oct 2019
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5043
Abstract
Providing a seamless handover in the Internet of Thing (IoT) applications with minimal efforts is a big challenge in mobility management protocols. Several research efforts have been attempted to maintain the connectivity of nodes while performing mobility-related signalling, in order to enhance the [...] Read more.
Providing a seamless handover in the Internet of Thing (IoT) applications with minimal efforts is a big challenge in mobility management protocols. Several research efforts have been attempted to maintain the connectivity of nodes while performing mobility-related signalling, in order to enhance the system performance. However, these studies still fall short at the presence of short-term continuous movements of mobile nodes within the same network, which is a requirement in several applications. In this paper, we propose an efficient group-based handoff scheme for the Mobile Nodes (MNs) in order to reduce the nodes handover during their roaming. This scheme is named Enhanced Cluster Sensor Proxy Mobile IPv6 (E-CSPMIPv6). E-CSPMIPv6 introduces a fast handover scheme by implementing two mechanisms. In the first mechanism, we cluster mobile nodes that are moving as a group in order to register them at a prior time of their actual handoff. In the second mechanism, we manipulate the mobility-related signalling of the MNs triggering their handover signalling simultaneously. The efficiency of the proposed scheme is validated through extensive simulation experiments and numerical analyses in comparison to the state-of-the-art mobility management protocols under different scenarios and operation conditions. The results demonstrate that the E-CSPMIPv6 scheme significantly improves the overall system performance, by reducing handover delay, signalling cost and end-to-end delay. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The MN’ expectation scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Message flow diagram for E-CSPMIPv6 scheme based on CN-MN mechanism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The message flow diagram for E-CSPMIPv6 scheme based on CR-MN mechanism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Example of diamond interchange road.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>System Architecture of E-CSPMIPv6 scheme in localised domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Overlapping area within the E-CSPMIPv6 infrastructure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect the inter-cluster operation on the TC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The overall TC of inter-cluster operation for CR-MN mechanism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Simulation scenario [<a href="#B12-computers-08-00075" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Performance of signalling cost vs. the number of MNs (CN-MN mechanism).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Performance of signalling cost vs. the number of MNs (CR-MN mechanism).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Performance of handoff latency vs. the number of MNs (CN-MN mechanism).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Performance of Handoff latency vs. the number of MNs (CR-MN mechanism).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Performance of end-to-end delay vs. the number of MNs.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 813 KiB  
Article
A Velocity-Aware Handover Trigger in Two-Tier Heterogeneous Networks
by Asmae Ait Mansour, Nourddine Enneya and Mohamed Ouadou
Future Internet 2018, 10(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi10010009 - 15 Jan 2018
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 6288
Abstract
The unexpected change in user equipment (UE) velocity is recognized as the primary explanation for poor handover quality. In order to resolve this issue, while limiting ping-pong (PP) events we carefully and dynamically optimized handover parameters for each UE unit according to its [...] Read more.
The unexpected change in user equipment (UE) velocity is recognized as the primary explanation for poor handover quality. In order to resolve this issue, while limiting ping-pong (PP) events we carefully and dynamically optimized handover parameters for each UE unit according to its velocity and the coverage area of the access point (AP). In order to recognize any variations in velocity, we applied Allan variance (AVAR) to the received signal strength (RSS) from the serving AP. To assess our approach, it was essential to configure a heterogeneous network context (LTE-WiFi) and interconnect Media-Independent Handover (MIH) and Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) for seamless handover. Reproduction demonstrated that our approach does not only result in a gain in relatively accurate velocity but in addition reduces the number of PP and handover failures (HOFs). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Principle of sub-sampling by Allan variance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The Allan variance (AVAR) of the received signal strength (RSS) for the user equipment (UE) leaving the access point (AP) area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The AVAR of the RSS for the UE entering the AP area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flow chart for handover decision-based velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Operation procedure of the proposed IEEE 802.21 MIH functionality assisted by PMIPv6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Heterogeneous network topology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Handover failure (HOF) rate according to velocity. The confidence interval is 95%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Packet loss rate according to velocity. The confidence interval is 95%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Handover delay according to velocity. The confidence interval is 95%.</p>
Full article ">
773 KiB  
Article
Sensor Proxy Mobile IPv6 (SPMIPv6)—A Novel Scheme for Mobility Supported IP-WSNs
by Md. Motaharul Islam and Eui-Nam Huh
Sensors 2011, 11(2), 1865-1887; https://doi.org/10.3390/s110201865 - 1 Feb 2011
Cited by 77 | Viewed by 15446
Abstract
IP based Wireless Sensor Networks (IP-WSNs) are gaining importance for their broad range of applications in health-care, home automation, environmental monitoring, industrial control, vehicle telematics and agricultural monitoring. In all these applications, mobility in the sensor network with special attention to energy efficiency [...] Read more.
IP based Wireless Sensor Networks (IP-WSNs) are gaining importance for their broad range of applications in health-care, home automation, environmental monitoring, industrial control, vehicle telematics and agricultural monitoring. In all these applications, mobility in the sensor network with special attention to energy efficiency is a major issue to be addressed. Host-based mobility management protocols are not suitable for IP-WSNs because of their energy inefficiency, so network based mobility management protocols can be an alternative for the mobility supported IP-WSNs. In this paper we propose a network based mobility supported IP-WSN protocol called Sensor Proxy Mobile IPv6 (SPMIPv6). We present its architecture, message formats and also evaluate its performance considering signaling cost, mobility cost and energy consumption. Our analysis shows that with respect to the number of IP-WSN nodes, the proposed scheme reduces the signaling cost by 60% and 56%, as well as the mobility cost by 62% and 57%, compared to MIPv6 and PMIPv6, respectively. The simulation results also show that in terms of the number of hops, SPMIPv6 decreases the signaling cost by 56% and 53% as well as mobility cost by 60% and 67% as compared to MIPv6 and PMIPv6 respectively. It also indicates that proposed scheme reduces the level of energy consumption significantly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures


<p>Sensor Proxy Mobile IPv6 Architecture.</p>
Full article ">
<p>Operational Architecture of SPMIPv6.</p>
Full article ">
<p>Mobility scenario in SPMIPv6-based patient care unit.</p>
Full article ">
<p><b>(a)</b> Sequence diagram in PMIPv6. <b>(b)</b> Sequence diagram in SPMIPv6.</p>
Full article ">
<p><b>(a)</b> SPMIPv6 PBU Message Format. <b>(b)</b> SPMIPv6 PBA Message Format.</p>
Full article ">
<p><b>(a)</b> SPMIPv6 Router Solicitation (RS) Message Format. <b>(b)</b> SPMIPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) Message Format.</p>
Full article ">
<p>Type Classification and State diagram of a six-sublayer PAN area model.</p>
Full article ">
<p>Analytical model for the performances analysis of SPMIPv6.</p>
Full article ">
<p>Number of IP-WSN nodes <span class="html-italic">vs.</span> Signaling Cost.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop