Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (72)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = SysML

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 5449 KiB  
Article
Formononetin Exerts Neuroprotection in Parkinson’s Disease via the Activation of the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway
by Xiaotong Wang, Nianxin Kang, Ying Liu and Guojie Xu
Molecules 2024, 29(22), 5364; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29225364 - 14 Nov 2024
Viewed by 299
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disease for which no effective treatment currently exists. In this study, we identified formononetin (FMN), a neuroprotective component found in herbal medicines such as Astragalus membranaceus and Glycyrrhiza uralensis, as a potential agent targeting multiple [...] Read more.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disease for which no effective treatment currently exists. In this study, we identified formononetin (FMN), a neuroprotective component found in herbal medicines such as Astragalus membranaceus and Glycyrrhiza uralensis, as a potential agent targeting multiple pathways involved in PD. To investigate the anti-PD effects of FMN, we employed Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) PD models, specifically the transgenic strain NL5901 and the MPP(+)-induced strain BZ555, to investigate the effects of FMN on the key pathological features of PD, including dyskinesia, dopamine neuron damage, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation. The MPP(+)-induced SH-SY5Y cell PD model was utilized to evaluate the effects of FMN on cell viability, ROS accumulation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. The signaling pathway induced by FMN was analyzed using transcriptomic techniques and subsequently validated in vitro. Our results indicate that FMN significantly reduced ROS accumulation and improved both dopaminergic neuron vitality and dyskinesia in the C. elegans PD models. In the cell PD model, FMN significantly reduced ROS accumulation and enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and cell viability. A transcriptomic analysis suggested that the effects of FMN are associated with Nrf2 activation. Furthermore, ML385, a specific Nrf2 inhibitor, blocked the beneficial effects of FMN in vitro, indicating that FMN ameliorates dyskinesia and protects dopaminergic neurons through Nrf2 signaling pathway activation. In addition, the effects of FMN on ameliorating dyskinesia and protecting dopamine neurons were comparable to those of the Nrf2 agonist of sulforaphane (SFN) in vivo. The results of this study confirm that FMN exerts significant anti-PD effects primarily through the Nrf2 signaling pathway. These findings provide crucial insights for the development of anti-PD therapies. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Bioinformatics-based target prediction suggests a potential role for FMN in alleviating Parkinson’s disease (PD). (<b>A</b>) An illustration of the chemical structure of FMN. (<b>B</b>) A Venn diagram illustrating the overlap between PD-related proteins and FMN targets, created using VENNY (version 2.1, <a href="https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html" target="_blank">https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html</a>, accessed on 15 March 2024). (<b>C</b>) An interactive network visualization of PD-related proteins and FMN targets. (<b>D</b>) A Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) network of shared targets, revealing complex interconnections and potential pathways influenced by FMN in PD. The PPI network was constructed using the String database (version 12.0, <a href="http://string-db.org/" target="_blank">http://string-db.org/</a>, accessed on 15 March 2024), identifying 24 nodes and 50 edges. Differently colored nodes represent hub genes. (<b>E</b>) A Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of FMN’s potential targets in PD, highlighting the presynaptic membrane receptor response to oxygen-containing signals in red. The column color indicates significance, and its length reflects the number of genes enriched in the function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>FMN alleviated the key pathological features of PD in the MPP(+)-induced <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span> model. (<b>A</b>) Experimental procedure: <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span> at L4 were treated with 4 mM MPP(+) (MPP) or 100 to 300 μM FMN (MPP + FMN) for 4 days at 20 °C, with an untreated group serving as the control (Ctrl). (<b>B</b>–<b>D</b>) The effects of FMN on dopamine neuron impairment and motor function in MPP(+)-induced <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span> BZ555. (<b>B</b>) Representative fluorescent images illustrating the effect of FMN on GFP-labeled dopamine neurons (green) in the head region. Scale bar = 100 μm <span class="html-italic">(n</span> = 15; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>C</b>) The quantification of fluorescence in dopamine neurons. (<b>D</b>) Motor function was assessed through a thrashing rate analysis (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 15; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>E</b>–<b>G</b>) The effects of 200 μM FMN on ROS and the expression of ROS-related genes in MPP(+)-induced <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span> N2, shown by (<b>E</b>) representative fluorescence images and (<b>F</b>) the quantification of ROS fluorescence (green). Scale bar = 300 μm (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 15; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>G</b>) The expression levels of ROS-related genes quantified by qRT-PCR (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3), where <span class="html-italic">N</span> = the number of independent experiments and <span class="html-italic">n</span> = the number of nematodes in each independent experiment. An asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between the Model and Ctrl groups. A hash mark (#) indicates significant differences between the FMN and Model groups. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, # <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and ### <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>FMN demonstrates neuroprotective effects in MPP(+)-induced SH-SY5Y cells. (<b>A</b>) The experimental procedure for treating SH-SY5Y cells with FMN. (<b>B</b>) An assessment of FMN toxicity in SH-SY5Y cells (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3, <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>C</b>) The effects of varying concentrations of FMN on the viability of SH-SY5Y cells exposed to MPP(+) (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>D</b>) Representative fluorescent images illustrating the effects of FMN (5 μM) on the ROS levels and mitochondrial membrane potential (JC-1) in MPP(+)-exposed SH-SY5Y cells. (<b>E</b>) The quantification of ROS fluorescence in SH-SY5Y cells (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 7; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>F</b>) The quantification of JC-1 dye in SH-SY5Y cells (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 13; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). <span class="html-italic">N</span> = the number of independent experiments; <span class="html-italic">n</span> = the number of nematodes in each independent experiment. In (<b>B</b>), an asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between the FMN and Ctrl groups, while in (<b>C</b>–<b>F</b>), an asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between the Model and Ctrl groups. A hash mark (#) indicates significant differences between the FMN and Model groups. Ns indicates no significant difference between the Model and Ctrl groups. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001, # <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and ### <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The proposed mechanism for FMN’s anti-PD effects through the activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway. (<b>A</b>) A volcano plot of the DEGs identified from the transcriptome analysis following FMN treatment. The DEGs related to the Nrf2 signaling pathway that were upregulated by FMN are highlighted with a red frame. Transcriptome data were downloaded and analyzed using an online ITCM database (<a href="http://itcm.biotcm.net/" target="_blank">http://itcm.biotcm.net/</a>, analyzed on 6 August 2023). (<b>B</b>) A PPI network and (<b>C</b>) the relative expression profiles of Nrf2-associated genes among the DEGs identified from the FMN-treated sample transcriptome data. (<b>D</b>) A disease-related enrichment analysis of the DEGs derived from the transcriptome data of the FMN-treated samples, with relevance to PD highlighted in red. An asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between the Model and Ctrl groups; * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The Nrf2-specific inhibitor (ML385) blocks the beneficial effects of FMN in MPP(+)-treated SH-SY5Y cells. (<b>A</b>) A Western blot analysis of nuclear-translocated Nrf2 protein. (<b>B</b>) The quantification of nuclear-translocated Nrf2 protein (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>C</b>) Representative fluorescence images of ROS and JC-1 staining in SH-SY5Y cells exposed to MPP(+). (<b>D</b>) The quantification of ROS fluorescence in MPP(+)-treated SH-SY5Y cells (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>E</b>) The quantification of JC-1 fluorescence in SH-SY5Y cells exposed to MPP(+) (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 15; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>F</b>) The viability of SH-SY5Y cells exposed to MPP(+) (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). <span class="html-italic">N</span> represents the number of independent experiments, and <span class="html-italic">n</span> represents the number of samples per experiment. In (<b>B</b>), an asterisk (*) denotes significant differences between the FMN and Ctrl groups, while in (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>), an asterisk (*) denotes significant differences between the Model and Ctrl groups. A hash mark (#) indicates significant differences between the FMN and Model groups or between the FMN+ML385 and FMN groups. Ns indicates no significant difference between the Model and Ctrl groups. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001, # <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, and ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>FMN exhibits anti-PD effects comparable to the antioxidant SFN in <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span>. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) The effects of FMN on the impairment of dopamine neuron damage and motor ability in MPP(+)-induced <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span> BZ555. (<b>A</b>) Representative fluorescent images showing the effect on GFP-labeled dopamine neurons (green) in the head region of nematodes. Scale bar = 100 μm. (<b>B</b>) The quantification of dopamine neuron fluorescence (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 15; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>C</b>) Motor ability measured through a thrashing rate analysis (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 15; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). (<b>D</b>) The experimental procedure for NL5901 worms: <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span> at L4 were treated with 200 μM FMN or SFN for 4 days at 20 °C, with untreated worms serving as the control (Ctrl). (<b>F</b>,<b>G</b>) The effects of FMN or SFN on α-synuclein aggregation and motor ability in <span class="html-italic">C. elegans</span> NL5901. (<b>E</b>) Representative fluorescent images showing the effect of FMN on GFP-labeled α-synuclein (green) in the body wall muscle cells of nematodes. Scale bar = 300 μm. (<b>F</b>) The quantification of α-synulein fluorescence. <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 15; <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3. (<b>G</b>) Motor ability measured through a thrashing rate analysis (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 15: <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 3). <span class="html-italic">N</span> = the number of independent experiments, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = number of nematodes per independent experiment. In (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>), an asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference between the FMN and Ctrl groups, while a hash mark (#) indicates a significant difference between any two of the Model, FMN, and SFN groups. In (<b>F</b>,<b>G</b>), an asterisk (*) denotes a significant difference between the FMN group or SFN group and the Model group. Ns indicates no significant difference between the FMN and SFN groups. *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and ### <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A summary of the effect of FMN on PD. FMN mitigates MPP(+)-induced oxidative stress and protects dopaminergic neurons via Nrf2 activation in a Parkinson’s disease model. MPP(+) increases ROS production, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and the accumulation of α-synuclein, which further exacerbates neuronal damage. By activating the Nrf2 pathway, FMN helps to mitigate oxidative stress, reduce mitochondrial damage, and protect dopaminergic neurons, potentially delaying or preventing PD progression (created with Biorender, <a href="https://app.biorender.com/" target="_blank">https://app.biorender.com/</a>, accessed on 10 August 2024). The black arrows indicate the known mechanisms by which MPP induces the PD model, while the red arrows and lines represent the mechanism of FMN, which exerts neuroprotective effects by activating Nrf2 to inhibit oxidative stress.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 26175 KiB  
Article
X-RMTV: An Integrated Approach for Requirement Modeling, Traceability Management, and Verification in MBSE
by Pengfei Gu, Yuteng Zhang, Zhen Chen, Chun Zhao, Kunyu Xie, Zhuoyi Wu and Lin Zhang
Systems 2024, 12(10), 443; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100443 - 20 Oct 2024
Viewed by 915
Abstract
Formal requirements modeling and traceability management are essential for effectively implementing Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE). However, few studies have explored the integration of requirement modeling, traceability management, and verification within MBSE-based systems engineering methodologies. Moreover, the predominant modeling language for MBSE, SysML, lacks [...] Read more.
Formal requirements modeling and traceability management are essential for effectively implementing Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE). However, few studies have explored the integration of requirement modeling, traceability management, and verification within MBSE-based systems engineering methodologies. Moreover, the predominant modeling language for MBSE, SysML, lacks sufficient capabilities for requirement description and traceability management and for depicting physical attributes and executable capabilities, making it challenging to verify functional and non-functional requirements collaboratively. This paper proposes an integrated approach for requirement modeling, traceability management, and verification, building on the previously proposed integrated modeling and the simulation language called X language. Our contributions primarily include defining the ReqXL specification for MBSE-oriented requirement modeling based on X language, proposing an algorithm for automatically generating requirement traces, and an integrated framework for requirements modeling, traceability management, and verification was developed by combining the X language with ReqXL. These functionalities were customized on the self-developed integrated modeling and simulation platform, XLab, which is specifically tailored for the X language. Furthermore, we showcase the efficacy and promise of our approach through a case study involving the design of an aircraft electrical system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Model-Based Systems Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The relationship between ReqXL and existing elements of the X language.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Specified patterns for expressing different types of requirements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>ReqXL metamodel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>ReqXL grammar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Integrated framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Requirement models based on ReqXL’s graphical and text views.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Overall process for generating requirement traceability Links.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Integrated platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Modeling stakeholder needs and their sources based on ReqXL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Problem domain with the aircraft electrical system considered as a black box: (<b>a</b>) Stakeholder needs; (<b>b</b>) System context; (<b>c</b>) Use case scenarios; (<b>d</b>) Use cases; (<b>e</b>) Measurements of effectiveness.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Modeling the relationships between stakeholder needs and functional models based on ReqXL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Problem domain with the aircraft electrical system considered as a white box: (<b>a</b>) Functional analysis; (<b>b</b>) Logical architecture definition; (<b>c</b>) Logical subsystems communication; (<b>d</b>) Logical architecture text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Modeling the system requirements, component requirements and the relationships between system requirements, component requirements, and functional models based on ReqXL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Graphical and textual models for the radar: (<b>a</b>) Definition diagram for the radar; (<b>b</b>) State machine diagram for the radar; (<b>c</b>) Text for the radar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Simulation results of sim_rudder,sim_radar and sim_fuse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Modeling the relationships between component requirements, designed system and simulation test cases based on ReqXL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Graphical and textual models for the battery: (<b>a</b>) Definition diagram for the battery; (<b>b</b>) State machine diagram for the battery; (<b>c</b>) Text for the battery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Simulation results of sim_battery.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Modeling the relationships between component requirements CR.1 and CR.2, designed system and simulation test cases based on ReqXL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>The traces model for SN.1.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 4239 KiB  
Article
Early Design Stage Evaluation of All Electric Aircraft Power Systems Focusing on Long-Term Behavior
by Melanie Hoffmann, David Inkermann, Christoph Knieke, Fanke Zeng, Tobias Kopp, Michael Terörde and Michael Kurrat
Energies 2024, 17(18), 4653; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184653 - 18 Sep 2024
Viewed by 852
Abstract
In the aircraft industry, there is a shift towards more and all-electric power systems resulting in great research efforts on single components like batteries. At the same time there is an increasing need to investigate and evaluate the long-term behavior of the whole [...] Read more.
In the aircraft industry, there is a shift towards more and all-electric power systems resulting in great research efforts on single components like batteries. At the same time there is an increasing need to investigate and evaluate the long-term behavior of the whole electric power system to ensure safe and sustainable aircraft operation. Focusing on this challenge, the objective of this article is to propose a framework for electric power system assessment in the early design stages. In particular, the focus is on identifying and handling uncertainties regarding failure behavior and degradation, both on the component and system level. The evaluation of different power system topologies is based on the integration of Model-Based Systems Engineering and robust design methods. In this context, another central aspect is the definition of system and component requirements derived from the flight mission profile. SysML diagrams are used to define use cases and possible system topologies. Sensitivity of degradation effects are evaluated using robust design methods. The application of the framework and these methods is illustrated using a short-range aircraft with an all-electric power system. The results highlight the applicability of the framework to cope with the uncertainties that occur in the early design stages and point out fields of further research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reliable and Safe Electric Vehicle Powertrain Design and Optimization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Causes of uncertainties in power system engineering involving new technologies and system architectures, based on [<a href="#B10-energies-17-04653" class="html-bibr">10</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Basic architecture, subsystems and components of a battery-based electric propulsion system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Classification of selected types of SysML diagrams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Requirement diagram for AEA systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Algorithm for preliminary sizing of battery-based propulsion systems based on and simplified from Anker and Noland [<a href="#B20-energies-17-04653" class="html-bibr">20</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Methodology flow chart for early design stage power system development and model-based evaluation of long-term behavior.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Evaluation method based on [<a href="#B43-energies-17-04653" class="html-bibr">43</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Use case diagram with different use cases and phase of the flight and charging process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mission profile based on [<a href="#B16-energies-17-04653" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B21-energies-17-04653" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Block definition diagram (BDD) of the electric power system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Different topologies that were developed and evaluated with (<b>a</b>) Topology 1: Basic Configuration; (<b>b</b>) Topology 2: Basic Topology with Connector between Strings; (<b>c</b>) Topology 3: Basic Topology with Connector and Additional Bus Bar Switch; (<b>d</b>) Topology 4: Basic Topology with Individual Battery Converters; (<b>e</b>) Topology 5: Basic Topology with Ten Batteries.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Aircraft layout for cable length calculation.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3962 KiB  
Article
Dynamic Fault Tree Generation and Quantitative Analysis of System Reliability for Embedded Systems Based on SysML Models
by Changyong Chu, Weikang Yang and Yajun Chen
Sensors 2024, 24(18), 6021; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24186021 - 18 Sep 2024
Viewed by 843
Abstract
As embedded systems become increasingly complex, traditional reliability analysis methods based on text alone are no longer adequate for meeting the requirements of rapid and accurate quantitative analysis of system reliability. This article proposes a method for automatically generating and quantitatively analyzing dynamic [...] Read more.
As embedded systems become increasingly complex, traditional reliability analysis methods based on text alone are no longer adequate for meeting the requirements of rapid and accurate quantitative analysis of system reliability. This article proposes a method for automatically generating and quantitatively analyzing dynamic fault trees based on an improved system model with consideration for temporal characteristics and redundancy. Firstly, an “anti-semantic” approach is employed to automatically explore the generation of fault modes and effects analysis (FMEA) from SysML models. The evaluation results are used to promptly modify the system design to meet requirements. Secondly, the Profile extension mechanism is used to expand the SysML block definition diagram, enabling it to describe fault semantics. This is combined with SysML activity diagrams to generate dynamic fault trees using traversal algorithms. Subsequently, parametric diagrams are employed to represent the operational rules of logic gates in the fault tree. The quantitative analysis of dynamic fault trees based on probabilistic models is conducted within the internal block diagram of SysML. Finally, through the design and simulation of the power battery management system, the failure probability of the top event was obtained to be 0.11981. This verifies that the design of the battery management system meets safety requirements and demonstrates the feasibility of the method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI-Assisted Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The automatic Dynamic Fault Trees Generation and quantitative analysis approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Extension method for stereotype of spare parts and stereotype “Substitutes for”: (<b>a</b>) stereotype of spare parts; (<b>b</b>) stereotype “Substitutes for”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Profile extension for “temporal nature”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Dynamic fault tree generation steps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Parametric diagram of dynamic logic gate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>System structure diagram of battery management system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>SysML block definition diagram for the battery management system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Activity diagram for the battery management system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Visualized fault tree for the battery management system.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 3020 KiB  
Article
Text-to-Model Transformation: Natural Language-Based Model Generation Framework
by Aditya Akundi, Joshua Ontiveros and Sergio Luna
Systems 2024, 12(9), 369; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090369 - 14 Sep 2024
Viewed by 936
Abstract
System modeling language (SysML) diagrams generated manually by system modelers can sometimes be prone to errors, which are time-consuming and introduce subjectivity. Natural language processing (NLP) techniques and tools to create SysML diagrams can aid in improving software and systems design processes. Though [...] Read more.
System modeling language (SysML) diagrams generated manually by system modelers can sometimes be prone to errors, which are time-consuming and introduce subjectivity. Natural language processing (NLP) techniques and tools to create SysML diagrams can aid in improving software and systems design processes. Though NLP effectively extracts and analyzes raw text data, such as text-based requirement documents, to assist in design specification, natural language, inherent complexity, and variability pose challenges in accurately interpreting the data. In this paper, we explore the integration of NLP with SysML to automate the generation of system models from input textual requirements. We propose a model generation framework leveraging Python and the spaCy NLP library to process text input and generate class/block definition diagrams using PlantUML for visual representation. The intent of this framework is to aid in reducing the manual effort in creating SysML v1.6 diagrams—class/block definition diagrams in this case. We evaluate the effectiveness of the framework using precision and recall measures. The contribution of this paper to the systems modeling domain is two-fold. First, a review and analysis of natural language processing techniques for the automated generation of SysML diagrams are provided. Second, a framework to automatically extract textual relationships tailored for generating a class diagram/block diagram that contains the classes/blocks, their relationships, methods, and attributes is presented. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Proposed model generation framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Illustration of dependency visualizer use.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representation of PlantUML syntax.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A set of requirements for a hypothetical UAV surveillance scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>An instance of a user interface prompt to enable the selection of appropriate classes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>An instance of a user interface prompt to enable the selection of appropriate methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Generated class diagram using the framework for the UAV requirement specification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Class diagram generated for Text 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Class diagram generated for Text 2.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 9936 KiB  
Article
Integration of EMU Overall Design Model Based on Ontology–Knowledge Collaboration
by Baomin Wang, Tingli Huang, Lujie Zhou, Lin Guan and Keyan Wan
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(17), 7828; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177828 - 4 Sep 2024
Viewed by 606
Abstract
The whole train design of an Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) involves multiple domains and scenarios, thus requiring comprehensive consideration of various factors during the design process. Traditional design methods often utilize text-based approaches to model systems; however, such documentation-based designs often suffer from [...] Read more.
The whole train design of an Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) involves multiple domains and scenarios, thus requiring comprehensive consideration of various factors during the design process. Traditional design methods often utilize text-based approaches to model systems; however, such documentation-based designs often suffer from semantic heterogeneity, inconsistent data sources, and also struggle to provide a more intuitive overview of the overall design process. To address these issues, this paper proposes a method based on ontology–knowledge collaborative drive to achieve integration of the overall EMU design. Firstly, we employ the System Modeling Language (SysML) to construct the Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) model of the EMU, establishing functional and physical architecture element models, with the EMU MBSE model serving as input. Subsequently, in the requirement model, architecture model, and traceability model, we utilize top-level ontology to construct the EMU ontology framework in a top-down manner. Lastly, leveraging the Neo4j database, we employ a knowledge graph (KG) approach to fill domain knowledge into each model in a bottom-up manner, thereby realizing the ontology–knowledge collaborative drive for the overall EMU design construction. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated using the EMU Passenger Information System (PIS) and Traction transformer System (TS) as examples. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Transportation and Future Mobility)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Technological Roadmap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Process of Requirement Model Design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The conversion process from requirement to ontology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Stakeholders.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Partial diagram of requirements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Requirements ontology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Requirements ontology visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Conversion between ReqIF model and ontology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The meta-modeling language GOPPRR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The standard four-layer model system of MOF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Conversion rules between the core content of GOPPRR and the ontology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Functional meta-model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>EMU architecture KG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Traceability Matrix.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Conversion rules between the traceability matrix and the ontology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Semantic integration of EMU PIS system requirements, architecture, and traceability relationship model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Description and construction of the requirements, architecture, and traceability relationship models of the EMU PIS system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>PIS requirements KG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Semantic integration of requirements, architecture, and traceability relationship model for the TS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>KG of requirements for the TS.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 3780 KiB  
Article
Open-Source Data Formalization through Model-Based Systems Engineering for Concurrent Preliminary Design of CubeSats
by Giacomo Luccisano, Sophia Salas Cordero, Thibault Gateau and Nicole Viola
Aerospace 2024, 11(9), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11090702 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 665
Abstract
Market trends in the space sector suggest a notable increase in satellite operations and market value for the coming decade. In parallel, there has been a shift in the industrial and academic sectors from traditional Document-Based System Engineering to Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) [...] Read more.
Market trends in the space sector suggest a notable increase in satellite operations and market value for the coming decade. In parallel, there has been a shift in the industrial and academic sectors from traditional Document-Based System Engineering to Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) combined with Concurrent engineering (CE) practices. Due to growing demands, the drivers behind this change have been the need for quicker and more cost-effective design processes. A key challenge in this transition remains to determine how to effectively formalize and exchange data during all design stages and across all discipline-specific tools; as representing systems through models can be a complex endeavor. For instance, during the Preliminary design (PD) phase, the integration of system models with external mathematical models for simulations, analyses, and system budgeting is crucial. The introduction of CubeSats and their standard has partly addressed the question of standardization and has aided in reducing overall development time and costs in the space sector. Nevertheless, questions about how to successfully exchange data endure. This paper focuses on formalizing a CubeSat model for use across various stages of the PD phase. The entire process is conducted with the exclusive use of open-source tools, to facilitate the transparency of data integration across the PD phases, and the overall life cycle of a CubeSat. The paper has two primary outcomes: (i) developing a generic CubeSat model using Systems modeling language (SysML) that includes data storage and visualization through the application of Unified modeling language (UML) stereotypes, streamlining in parallel information exchange for integration with various simulation and analysis tools; (ii) creating an end-to-end use case scenario within the Nanostar software suite (NSS), an open-source framework designed to streamline data exchange across different software during CE sessions. A case study from a theoretical academic space mission concept is presented as the illustration of how to utilize the proposed formalization, and it serves as well as a preliminary validation of the proposed formalization. The proposed formalization positions the CubeSat SysML model as the central data source throughout the design process. It also supports automated trade-off analyses by combining the benefits of SysML with effective data instantiating across all PD study phases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Space Systems Preliminary Design)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Proposed Framework Formalization Steps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>System UML stereotypes definition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Orbit and Propagation Losses UML stereotypes definition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Ground station UML stereotype.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Operating mode UML stereotype.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Payload BDD example.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>TWC output power and data budgets. (<b>a</b>) TWC power budget. (<b>b</b>) TWC data budget.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Example of requirement list output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Example of payload relationship graph. Connections are derived from the BDD in <a href="#aerospace-11-00702-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Data flow scheme of an application of the proposed formalization.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Example of UML class and object with inherited attributes and operations.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Example of UML generalization.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>UML stereotype examples. (<b>a</b>) Stereotype definition example. (<b>b</b>) Stereotype application example.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>TWC system-level Block definition diagram implemented in SysML.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 10171 KiB  
Article
Multidisciplinary Reliability Design Optimization Modeling Based on SysML
by Qiang Zhang, Jihong Liu and Xu Chen
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(17), 7558; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177558 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 896
Abstract
Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) supports the system-level design of complex products effectively. Currently, system design and optimization for complex products are two distinct processes that must be executed using different software or platforms, involving intricate data conversion processes. Applying multidisciplinary optimization to validate [...] Read more.
Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) supports the system-level design of complex products effectively. Currently, system design and optimization for complex products are two distinct processes that must be executed using different software or platforms, involving intricate data conversion processes. Applying multidisciplinary optimization to validate system optimization often necessitates remodeling the optimization objects, which is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and highly error-prone. A critical activity in systems engineering is identifying the optimal design solution for the entire system. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) and reliability analysis are essential methods for achieving this. This paper proposes a SysML-based multidisciplinary reliability design optimization modeling method. First, by analyzing the definitions and mathematical models of multidisciplinary reliability design optimization, the SysML extension mechanism is employed to represent the optimization model based on SysML. Next, model transformation techniques are used to convert the SysML optimization model generated in the first stage into an XML description model readable by optimization solvers. Finally, the proposed method’s effectiveness is validated through an engineering case study of an in-vehicle environmental control integration system. The results demonstrate that this method fully utilizes SysML to express MDO problems, enhancing the efficiency of design optimization for complex systems. Engineers and system designers working on complex, multidisciplinary projects can particularly benefit from these advancements, as they simplify the integration of design and optimization processes, facilitating more reliable and efficient product development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The relationship between system design and system optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Structural information of the multidisciplinary optimization object model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variable type expansion in the value property.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Optimization variable metamodel definitions (The * represents multiplicity, where 0..* indicates zero to an infinite number of instances, while 1..* signifies one or more instances. The same notation is used in Figures 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 12.).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Optimization constraint metamodel definition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Extended definition of equation constraints and inequality constraints.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Optimization objective extension model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Optimization problem domain graphical element model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>XML-based translation mechanism.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Extraction rule metamodel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>SysML element extension metamodel (partial).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>SysML optimization metamodel extension.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Structural composition of air conditioning subsystem.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Structural composition of integrated air supply subsystem.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Air conditioning subsystem optimization model information.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Integrated air supply subsystem optimization model information.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Integrated air supply subsystem optimization objective constraint block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Optimization problems for in-vehicle environmental control integration system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>XML file obtained from SysML optimization model transformation.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 4246 KiB  
Article
An OOSEM-Based Design Pattern for the Development of AUV Controllers
by Cao Duc Sang, Ngo Van He, Ngo Van Hien and Nguyen Trong Khuyen
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(8), 1342; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081342 - 7 Aug 2024
Viewed by 837
Abstract
This article introduces a new design pattern that provides an optimal solution for the systematic development of AUV controllers. In this study, a hybrid control model is designed on the basis of the OOSEM (Object-Oriented Systems Engineering Method), combined with MDA (Model-Driven Architecture) [...] Read more.
This article introduces a new design pattern that provides an optimal solution for the systematic development of AUV controllers. In this study, a hybrid control model is designed on the basis of the OOSEM (Object-Oriented Systems Engineering Method), combined with MDA (Model-Driven Architecture) concepts, real-time UML/SysML (Unified Modeling Language/Systems Modeling Language), and the UKF (unscented Kalman filter) algorithm. This hybrid model enables the implementation of the control elements of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), which are considered HDSs (hybrid dynamic systems), and it can be adapted for reuse for most standard AUV platforms. To achieve this goal, a dynamic AUV model is integrated with the specializations of the OOSEM/MDA, in which an analysis model is clarified via a use-case model definition and then combined with HA (hybrid automata) to precisely define the control requirements. Next, the designed model is tailored via real-time UML/SysML to obtain the core control blocks, which describe the behaviors and structures of the control parts in detail. This design model is then transformed into an implementation model with the assistance of round-trip engineering to conveniently realize a controller for AUVs. Based on this new model, a feasible AUV controller for low-cost, turtle-shaped AUVs is implemented, and it is utilized to perform planar trajectory tracking. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A block definition diagram realized in SysML to represent the above-mentioned three AUV sub-systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The main use-case model capturing the core requirements of an AUV controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The state machine of the use-case “<span class="html-italic">Track a desired trajectory</span>”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A supplemented FBD for capturing the internal continuous evolution of the control parts of an AUV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A design pattern depicting control capsules for the developed AUV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Structures of control capsules for the developed AUV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The local state machine in the <span class="html-italic">discrete part</span> capsule in HA evolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The local state machine in the <span class="html-italic">IGCB</span> capsule for HA evolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>T-AUV real model and trial cruises.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>T-AUV approached and followed the triangle- (<b>a</b>) and rectangle-shaped (<b>b</b>) trajectories.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 4419 KiB  
Article
Engineering Systems with Standards and Digital Models: Development of a 15288-SysML Grid
by Kevin MacG. Adams, Irfan Ibrahim and Steven Krahn
Systems 2024, 12(8), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12080276 - 31 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1335
Abstract
The paradigm shift that has spurred the fourth industrial revolution, in what is termed Industry 4.0, has ushered in the need to adopt digital technologies throughout the worldwide industrial base to support system design efforts. The adoption of digital technologies with a [...] Read more.
The paradigm shift that has spurred the fourth industrial revolution, in what is termed Industry 4.0, has ushered in the need to adopt digital technologies throughout the worldwide industrial base to support system design efforts. The adoption of digital technologies with a digital enterprise and the creation of cyber–physical systems are central tenets of Industry 4.0 and directly support profitable business models, improvements in efficiency, and ensure durable quality for the modern industrial base. However, the techniques for engineering systems require new, improved, digital life cycle process models if Industry 4.0—and the goals for its integrated systems—are to be realized. The development of a technique that improves the life cycles for systems within the digital enterprise is required. The 15288-SysML Grid described herein supports the Industry 4.0 paradigm and its associated digital enterprise. This is accomplished through (1) the application of a modern life cycle process model (i.e., the adapted diamond); (2) the utilization of international standards for systems; and (3) the adoption of the four fundamental aspects of system design supported by model-based systems engineering (MBSE) and the systems modeling language (SysML). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Systems Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>DoD digital engineering framework [<a href="#B10-systems-12-00276" class="html-bibr">10</a>] (p. 11).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>NASA’s digital transformation strategic framework [<a href="#B8-systems-12-00276" class="html-bibr">8</a>] (p. 5).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Impacts of the digital transformation [<a href="#B11-systems-12-00276" class="html-bibr">11</a>] (p. 31).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Vee life cycle process model with associated stages (based upon [<a href="#B29-systems-12-00276" class="html-bibr">29</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><span class="html-italic">Boeing Diamond</span>© life cycle model (adapted from [<a href="#B30-systems-12-00276" class="html-bibr">30</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Physical design and delivery elements of the <span class="html-italic">Boeing Diamond</span>© lower Vee.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Virtual modeling and simulation elements of the <span class="html-italic">Boeing Diamond</span>© upper Vee.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Upper and lower Vee relationships in the <span class="html-italic">Boeing Diamond</span>©.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>ISO/IEC/IEEE Standard 15288 processes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Interrelationships between ISO/IEC/IEEE standards and 15288 technical processes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Interrelationships between ISO/IEC/IEEE standards and 15288 management processes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Articulated diamond life cycle process model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Intersection of MBSE with digital twins, physical twins, and the notional system life cycles stages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Nine SysML diagram types (based upon a figure in [<a href="#B41-systems-12-00276" class="html-bibr">41</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 8777 KiB  
Article
Development of a Body Weight Support System Employing Model-Based System Engineering Methodology
by Alberto E. Loaiza, Jose I. Garcia and Jose T. Buitrago
Technologies 2024, 12(8), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12080118 - 23 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1796
Abstract
Partial body weight support systems have proven to be a vital tool in performing physical therapy for patients with lower limb disabilities to improve gait. Developing this type of equipment requires rigorous design process that obtains a robust system, allowing physiotherapy exercises to [...] Read more.
Partial body weight support systems have proven to be a vital tool in performing physical therapy for patients with lower limb disabilities to improve gait. Developing this type of equipment requires rigorous design process that obtains a robust system, allowing physiotherapy exercises to be performed safely and efficiently. With this in mind, a “Model-Based Systems Engineering” design process using SysML improves communication between different areas, thereby increasing the synergy of interdisciplinary workgroups and positively impacting the development process of cyber-physical systems. The proposed development process presents a work sequence that defines a clear path in the design process, allowing traceability in the development phase. This also ensures the observability of elements related to a part that has suffered a failure. This methodology reduces the integration complexity between subsystems that compose the partial body weight support system because is possible to have a hierarchical and functional system vision at each design stage. The standard allowed requirements to be established graphically, making it possible to observe their system dependencies and who satisfied them. Consequently, the Partial Weight Support System was implemented through with a clear design route obtained by the MBSE methodology. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flux diagram of the global development of the BWS in SysML form. (<b>A</b>) General requirements diagram. (<b>B</b>) System layout diagram. (<b>C</b>) Use Case Diagram. (<b>D</b>) Pack diagram. (<b>E</b>) General structure of the system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flux diagram of the BWS mechanism development in SysML form. (<b>A</b>) Mechanism requirements diagram. (<b>B</b>) Mechanism layout diagram. (<b>C</b>) Mechanism transmission system. (<b>D</b>) Mechanism architecture. (<b>E</b>) Internal block diagram of the mechanism. (<b>F</b>) Mechanism parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flux diagram of the BWS chassis development in SysML form. (<b>A</b>) Chassis requirements diagram. (<b>B</b>) Chassis layout diagram. (<b>C</b>) Chassis CAD model. (<b>D</b>) Proof cases for the chassis. (<b>E</b>) Final model of the chassis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flux diagram of the BWS power system development in SysML form. (<b>A</b>) Power system requirements diagram. (<b>B</b>) Power system layout diagram. (<b>C</b>) Power system use cases. (<b>D</b>) BWS power system circuit. (<b>E</b>) Power system internal block diagram. (<b>F</b>) Power system sequence diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Flux diagram of the BWS control system development in SysML form. (<b>A</b>) Control system requirements diagram. (<b>B</b>) Control system layout diagram. (<b>C</b>) Control system use cases. (<b>D</b>) Control system configuration. (<b>E</b>) Control system internal block diagram. (<b>F</b>) Control system sequence diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flux diagram of the BWS controller development in SysML form. (<b>A</b>) Controller requirements diagram. (<b>B</b>) Controller layout diagram. (<b>C</b>) Typical control loop. (<b>D</b>) Model simulation of the typical control loop.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>BWS system implementation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison between the BWS system chassis and the implemented one.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 9993 KiB  
Article
Architecture Preliminary Design and Trade-Off Optimization of Stratospheric Airship Based on MBSE
by Weihao Lyu, Yanchu Yang, Jinggang Miao, Shenghong Cao and Lingsen Kong
Aerospace 2024, 11(7), 582; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11070582 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 841
Abstract
System architecture design is crucial for forward design in aerostat system engineering, yet a comprehensive research framework has been lacking. This paper presents a new method for stratospheric airship architecture preliminary design and optimization trade-off, grounded in Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) theory. Firstly, [...] Read more.
System architecture design is crucial for forward design in aerostat system engineering, yet a comprehensive research framework has been lacking. This paper presents a new method for stratospheric airship architecture preliminary design and optimization trade-off, grounded in Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) theory. Firstly, a requirement analysis for a stratospheric airship is conducted using SysML, leading to the analysis and acquisition of the airship’s mission architecture design. Additionally, a multidisciplinary coupling simulation platform is developed with MATLAB, and the architecture preliminary design’s Pareto front is derived using the NSGA-II algorithm. Finally, based on the Pareto optimization set, the TOPSIS algorithm is applied to derive the optimal architecture preliminary design scheme for the airship. The optimization results validate the accuracy of the architecture preliminary design obtained from the requirement analysis, the reliability of the multidisciplinary coupling simulation platform, and the feasibility of the optimization algorithms. This comprehensive study spans the requirement analysis to the optimal architecture scheme, providing theoretical reference and design guidance for the forward design of airship systems engineering. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The basic technical route and flow of forward design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Stratospheric airship basic use cases and functional division.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Activity diagram for overall mission phase activity diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Activity diagram for Mission Fly.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sequence diagram for Mission Fly.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Airship architecture design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Description of airship internal relationships.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Relationship of architecture, subject models, and three equilibria.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic diagram of the shape parameters of the airship.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The analysis for any cell of the solar array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The integration of different models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Total solution process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>NAGS-II solution process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Flowchart of optimization and trade-off.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Ternary graph of Pareto frontier for airship.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Binary graphs of Pareto frontier for airship: (<b>a</b>) is the CDV–mtotal binary graph, (<b>b</b>) is the mtotal–SdV binary graph, (<b>c</b>) is the SdV–CDV binary graph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Analysis of Spearman correlation coefficient: (<b>a</b>) is the area–volume ratio, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>d</mi> <mi>V</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, correlation coefficient, (<b>b</b>) is the total mass, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>l</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, correlation coefficient, (<b>c</b>) is the drag coefficient, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>V</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, correlation coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Comparison with the lowest drag coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Comparison with the lowest total mass.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Comparison with the lowest area–volume ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Binary graph of cost, C, and reliability, R.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>The final shape of the airship.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4865 KiB  
Article
Impact Assessment of Nematode Infestation on Soybean Crop Production Using Aerial Multispectral Imagery and Machine Learning
by Pius Jjagwe, Abhilash K. Chandel and David B. Langston
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(13), 5482; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135482 - 24 Jun 2024
Viewed by 978
Abstract
Accurate and prompt estimation of geospatial soybean yield (SY) is critical for the producers to determine key factors influencing crop growth for improved precision management decisions. This study aims to quantify the impacts of soybean cyst nematode (SCN) infestation on soybean production and [...] Read more.
Accurate and prompt estimation of geospatial soybean yield (SY) is critical for the producers to determine key factors influencing crop growth for improved precision management decisions. This study aims to quantify the impacts of soybean cyst nematode (SCN) infestation on soybean production and the yield of susceptible and resistant seed varieties. Susceptible varieties showed lower yield and crop vigor recovery, and high SCN population (20 to 1080) compared to resistant varieties (SCN populations: 0 to 340). High-resolution (1.3 cm/pixel) aerial multispectral imagery showed the blue band reflectance (r = 0.58) and Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI, r = −0.6) have the best correlation with the SCN populations. While GDNVI, Green Chlorophyll Index (GCI), and Normalized Difference Red Edge Index (NDRE) were the best differentiators of plant vigor and had the highest correlation with SY (r = 0.59–0.75). Reflectance (REF) and VIs were then used for SY estimation using two statistical and four machine learning (ML) models at 10 different train–test data split ratios (50:50–95:5). The ML models and train–test data split ratio had significant impacts on SY estimation accuracy. Random forest (RF) was the best and consistently performing model (r: 0.84–0.97, rRMSE: 8.72–20%), while a higher train–test split ratio lowered the performances of the ML models. The 95:5 train–test ratio showed the best performance across all the models, which may be a suitable ratio for modeling over smaller or medium-sized datasets. Such insights derived using high spatial resolution data can be utilized to implement precision crop protective operations for enhanced soybean yield and productivity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Characterization of the experimental area at Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center in Suffolk, VA. (<b>b</b>) Soybean experimental plots imaged using the aerial multispectral platform. (<b>c</b>) RGB natural color composition with study area bordered in red.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart showing soybean cyst nematode and crop vigor evaluation; and estimation of soybean yield using aerial multispectral imagery and statistical and machine learning models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Aerial imagery-derived (<b>a</b>) RGB true color composite; and sample vegetation index maps for (<b>b</b>) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and (<b>c</b>) Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Presentation of contrasting differences in (<b>a</b>) 7 July vigor; (<b>b</b>) 21 July vigor; (<b>c</b>) yield; (<b>d</b>) vigor recovery; (<b>e</b>) soybean cyst nematode population; and (<b>f</b>) aerial imagery-derived normalized difference red edge index for resistant and susceptible soybean varieties under different fungicide treatments (A to I).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) PCA biplot analysis to observe variability and collinearity of the 24 vegetation indices and five reflectance features; (<b>b</b>) correlation of vegetation indices derived from aerial multispectral imagery with yield, and (<b>c</b>) final features selected as inputs after dimensionality reduction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The Pearson correlation (r) and relative root mean square error (rRMSE) for measured and estimated soybean yields with REFs+VIs as an input group for models validated over (<b>a</b>) the train dataset at 95:5, (<b>b</b>) test dataset at 50:50, and (<b>c</b>) entire dataset at 95:5 splits.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Plots showing performances of six soybean yield estimation models through the (<b>a</b>) Pearson correlation (r) and (<b>b</b>) relative root mean square error (rRMSE) at ten train–test data split ratios and two input groups (REFs, REFs+VIs) when validated over entire, test and train datasets.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2188 KiB  
Article
Recommendations for the Model-Based Systems Engineering Modeling Process Based on the SysML Model and Domain Knowledge
by Jia Zhang and Shuqun Yang
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 4010; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14104010 - 8 May 2024
Viewed by 1617
Abstract
Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) is a modeling approach used in industry to support the formalization, analysis, design, checking and verification of systems. In MBSE modeling, domain knowledge is the basis of the modeling. However, modeling does not happen overnight; it requires systematic training [...] Read more.
Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) is a modeling approach used in industry to support the formalization, analysis, design, checking and verification of systems. In MBSE modeling, domain knowledge is the basis of the modeling. However, modeling does not happen overnight; it requires systematic training and a significant investment of resources. Unfortunately, many domain experts lack the expertise required for modeling, even though they know the domain well. The question arises about how to provide system modelers with domain knowledge at the right time to support the efficient completion of modeling. Since MBSE research that integrates AI is just beginning to take off, no public dataset is available. In this paper, aerospace SysML models are constructed based on spacecraft-related domain knowledge to form SysML model data. The validation rules are studied to validate the SysML model data, and combined with the concept of the recommended system, a recommendation method for the MBSE modeling process based on the knowledge and SysML model is proposed. A GLOVE language model is pre-trained by using domain knowledge and general knowledge; the model data are also used to fine-tune the GLOVE language model combined with the pre-training to recommend some domain development processes. The recommendation list is manually quality-verified and fed into the pre-training phase, while new requirement texts are continuously added in the fine-tuning phase, resulting in a more relevant and accurate recommendation list. Experiments show that the incremental recommender system can not only effectively recommend SysML models, but also improve the quality and efficiency of MBSE development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>SERC digital engineering roadmap [<a href="#B19-applsci-14-04010" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>SysML model example.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A technology roadmap for text and model-based one-time recommendation methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Testing with spacecraft as an example. (<b>a</b>) Creating the spacecraft block. (<b>b</b>) On this basis, the recommended items were selected according to <a href="#applsci-14-04010-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a> and added to the model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>SysML model constructed based on recommendations.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 815 KiB  
Article
Enhancing Safety in IoT Systems: A Model-Based Assessment of a Smart Irrigation System Using Fault Tree Analysis
by Alhassan Abdulhamid, Md Mokhlesur Rahman, Sohag Kabir and Ibrahim Ghafir
Electronics 2024, 13(6), 1156; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13061156 - 21 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1663
Abstract
The agricultural industry has the potential to undergo a revolutionary transformation with the use of Internet of Things (IoT) technology. Crop monitoring can be improved, waste reduced, and efficiency increased. However, there are risks associated with system failures that can lead to significant [...] Read more.
The agricultural industry has the potential to undergo a revolutionary transformation with the use of Internet of Things (IoT) technology. Crop monitoring can be improved, waste reduced, and efficiency increased. However, there are risks associated with system failures that can lead to significant losses and food insecurity. Therefore, a proactive approach is necessary to ensure the effective safety assessment of new IoT systems before deployment. It is crucial to identify potential causes of failure and their severity from the conceptual design phase of the IoT system within smart agricultural ecosystems. This will help prevent such risks and ensure the safety of the system. This study examines the failure behaviour of IoT-based Smart Irrigation Systems (SIS) to identify potential causes of failure. This study proposes a comprehensive Model-Based Safety Analysis (MBSA) framework to model the failure behaviour of SIS and generate analysable safety artefacts of the system using System Modelling Language (SysML). The MBSA approach provides meticulousness to the analysis, supports model reuse, and makes the development of a Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) model easier, thereby reducing the inherent limitations of informal system analysis. The FTA model identifies component failures and their propagation, providing a detailed understanding of how individual component failures can lead to the overall failure of the SIS. This study offers valuable insights into the interconnectedness of various component failures by evaluating the SIS failure behaviour through the FTA model. This study generates multiple minimal cut sets, which provide actionable insights into designing dependable IoT-based SIS. This analysis identifies potential weak points in the design and provides a foundation for safety risk mitigation strategies. This study emphasises the significance of a systematic and model-driven approach to improving the dependability of IoT systems in agriculture, ensuring sustainable and safe implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Electronics for Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Example of a Petri Net model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of a fault tree.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>SysML Diagrams.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Proposed MBSA framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Architecture of an IoT-based Smart Irrigation System.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Block definition diagram model of an IoT-based Smart Irrigation System.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Internal block diagram model of an IoT-based Smart Irrigation System.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Example of failure annotation, (<b>a</b>) failure annotation of a temperature sensor and (<b>b</b>) failure annotation of a power source.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mapping of component state machine diagram to component fault tree for (<b>a</b>) a temperature sensor and (<b>b</b>) a power source.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Fault tree generated for IoT-enabled SIS.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop