Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (151)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = FY3D

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 5197 KiB  
Article
Genome-Wide Association Studies for Lactation Performance in Buffaloes
by Wangchang Li, Henggang Li, Chunyan Yang, Haiying Zheng, Anqin Duan, Liqing Huang, Chao Feng, Xiaogan Yang and Jianghua Shang
Genes 2025, 16(2), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16020163 - 27 Jan 2025
Viewed by 510
Abstract
Background: Buffaloes are considered an indispensable genetic resource for dairy production. However, improvements in lactation performance have been relatively limited. Advances in sequencing technology, combined with genome-wide association studies, have facilitated the breeding of high-quality buffalo. Methods: We conducted an integrated [...] Read more.
Background: Buffaloes are considered an indispensable genetic resource for dairy production. However, improvements in lactation performance have been relatively limited. Advances in sequencing technology, combined with genome-wide association studies, have facilitated the breeding of high-quality buffalo. Methods: We conducted an integrated analysis of genomic sequencing data from 120 water buffalo, the high-quality water buffalo genome assembly designated as UOA_WB_1, and milk production traits, including 305-day milk yield (MY), peak milk yield (PM), total protein yield (PY), protein percentage (PP), fat percentage (FP), and total milk fat yield (FY). Results: The results identified 56 significant SNPs, and based on these markers, 54 candidate genes were selected. These candidate genes were significantly enriched in lactation-related pathways, such as the cAMP signaling pathway (ABCC4), TGF-β signaling pathway (LEFTY2), Wnt signaling pathway (CAMK2D), and metabolic pathways (DGAT1). Conclusions: These candidate genes (e.g., ABCC4, LEFTY2, CAMK2D, DGAT1) provide a substantial theoretical foundation for molecular breeding to enhance milk production in buffaloes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Correlation analysis of various lactation traits. MY, milk yield; PM, peak milk yield; PY, protein yield; FY, fat yield; PP, protein percentage; FP, fat percentage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The sample clustering obtained from PCA through three two-dimensional scatter plots, namely scatter (<b>A</b>), scatter (<b>B</b>), and scatter (<b>C</b>); scree plot (<b>D</b>). The percentage of variance explained by each PC is noted in parentheses. In the scatter plots, colored circles represent four different groups: DB, MB, NB, and ZB correspond to 1 DB, 42 MBs, 31 NBs, and 46 ZBs, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The line graph illustrating the cross-validation error rate is depicted, with the number of sample clusters delineated along the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis and the corresponding cross-validation error rate indicated on the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Genetic bar chart illustration for K-means clustering with varying numbers of clusters (K = 2 to 9).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Association analysis with milk production-related traits in water buffalo was conducted using the GLM-Q approach. The traits investigated include MY (<b>A</b>), PM (<b>B</b>), PY (<b>C</b>), FY (<b>D</b>), PP (<b>E</b>), and FP (<b>F</b>). The Manhattan plot on the left, created using the qqman package, illustrates the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values for SNP markers across 25 chromosomes (comprising 24 autosomes and 1 X chromosome). The blue line delineating the Manhattan plot signifies the significance threshold, determined by 0.05/N (number of SNP). Markers that surpass this threshold are deemed significant. The plot on the right is a Q-Q plot, where the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis denotes the observed values of the markers, and the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis represents the expected values, which have been transformed into the −10 log scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>GO and KEGG analysis of candidate genes. (<b>A</b>) GO bar plot diagram showing the top 20 enriched GO terms. GO categories, including cellular component, biological process, and molecular function. (<b>B</b>) The enrichment circle diagram shows the KEGG analysis of the top 20 pathways. Four circles from the outside to the inside. First circle: the classification of enrichment; outside the circle is the scale of the number of genes. Different colors represent different categories. Second circle: number and <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values of the classification in the background genes. The more genes, the longer the bars; the smaller the value, the redder the color. Third circle: bar chart of the total number of candidate genes. Fourth circle: rich factor value of each classification (number of candidate genes in this classification divided by the number of background genes). Each cell of the background helper line represents 0.1, and the color coding signifies the statistical significance of the corresponding enrichment.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 9783 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Spatial Dynamic Error on the Assimilation of Soil Moisture Retrieval Products
by Xuesong Bai, Zhengkun Qin, Juan Li, Shupeng Zhang and Lili Wang
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(2), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17020239 - 10 Jan 2025
Viewed by 657
Abstract
Soil moisture is a key factor affecting the exchange of heat and water between the land and the atmosphere. Land data assimilation (LDA) methods that leverage the strengths of both models and observations can generate more accurate initial conditions. However, soil moisture exhibits [...] Read more.
Soil moisture is a key factor affecting the exchange of heat and water between the land and the atmosphere. Land data assimilation (LDA) methods that leverage the strengths of both models and observations can generate more accurate initial conditions. However, soil moisture exhibits significant spatial heterogeneity, implying strong local characteristics for both observational and background errors. To elucidate the impact of error localization on LDA, we constructed a land data assimilation system (LDAS) suitable for the Common Land Model (CoLM), based on the simplified extended Kalman filter (SEKF) method. Through practical assimilation experiments using soil moisture retrieval products from the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) and Fenyun-3D (FY3D) satellites, we investigated the influence of spatial static and dynamic observational and background errors on LDA. The results indicate that by incorporating dynamic errors that account for the spatial heterogeneity of soil, LDAS can adaptively absorb observational information, thereby significantly enhancing assimilation impact and subsequent model forecast accuracy. Compared to experiments applying static errors, dynamic errors increased the spatial correlation coefficients by 17.4% and reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) by 11.2%. The results clearly demonstrate that for soil variable assimilation studies with strong spatial heterogeneity, progressively refined dynamic error estimation is a crucial direction for improving land surface assimilation performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>∂</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>SM<sub>2</sub>/<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>∂</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>SM<sub>n</sub> characteristics with respect to size of perturbation in different layers are shown. The black line represents <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfenced open="|" close="|" separators="|"> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">H</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">H</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and the red line represents <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">H</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>+</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">H</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>/2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spatial distribution STDs of the difference between (<b>a</b>) in situ and CoLM simulated soil moisture from June to August 2022, and (<b>b</b>) the STDs across different vegetation types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The average RMSE (<b>left</b>) and bias (<b>right</b>) between FY3D (<b>first line</b>) and SMAP (<b>second line</b>) soil moisture compared to that of the in situ results at different altitudes during the ascending (<b>top</b>) and descending orbits (<b>middle</b>), and the difference between ascending and descending orbits (<b>bottom</b>, ascending–descending orbits).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The average RMSE (<b>left</b>) and bias (<b>right</b>) between FY3D and SMAP soil moisture compared to that of in situ results for different vegetation types during the ascending (<b>top</b>), and descending orbits (<b>middle</b>), and the difference between ascending and descending orbits (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The spatial distribution of soil moisture on 3 June 2022 for SMAP (<b>left</b>) and FY3D (<b>right</b>). Black rectangles illustrate the areas with significant differences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The spatial distribution of the difference between the soil moisture of SMAP (<b>a</b>) or FY3D (<b>b</b>) and the background field on 3 June 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The spatial distribution of the difference between the soil moisture of SMAP (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and FY3D (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) with changeOB (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and singleOB (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) analysis fields on 3 June 2022. Spatial distribution of the |O-A| difference between the singleOB and changeOB experiments (singleOB–changeOB) for the retrieved soil moisture of the SMAP (<b>e</b>) and FY3D (<b>f</b>) satellites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>The spatial distribution of the difference between the soil moisture of SMAP (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and FY3D (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) with changeOB (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and singleOB (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) analysis fields on 3 June 2022. Spatial distribution of the |O-A| difference between the singleOB and changeOB experiments (singleOB–changeOB) for the retrieved soil moisture of the SMAP (<b>e</b>) and FY3D (<b>f</b>) satellites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of the analysis increments of the changeOB (<b>a</b>) and singleOB (<b>b</b>) experiments at 0000 UTC on 3 June 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distribution of the first-layer soil moisture for the changeOB (<b>a</b>) and singleOB (<b>b</b>) experiments and GLDAS (<b>c</b>) at 0000 UTC on 3 June 2022. Black rectangles illustrate areas with significant differences. The black dots marked as A, B, C, and D in the figure respectively represent the locations of the stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of the differences between changeOB (<b>a</b>) and singleOB (<b>b</b>) compared to GLDAS. Black rectangles illustrate areas with significant differences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The daily variation in the first-layer soil moisture over time from 1 June to 2 July 2022 under different vegetation types. The small chart in the lower right corner displays the background error (B) and the observation errors of FY3D (R_f) and SMAP (R_s) for the singleOB (red) and changeOB (blue) experiments at that point. The black solid line represents the control experiment, the red solid line represents the singleOB experiment, the blue solid line represents the changeOB experiment, the green solid line represents in situ data, the black dots represent FY3D, and the red dots represent SMAP. AWS represents in situ observations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The temporal variation in spatial correlation coefficients (<b>left</b>) and RMSE (<b>right</b>) among the CTL (black solid line), singleOB (red solid line), and changeOB (blue solid line) experiments and the GLDAS first-layer (<b>top</b>), second-layer (<b>middle</b>), and third-layer (<b>bottom</b>) soil moisture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Probability density distribution of correlation coefficient differences between assimilation and control experiments with in situ data (<b>a</b>). Histogram of correlation coefficient differences in different vegetation types (<b>b</b>). Blue and green represent the singleOB and changeOB experiments, respectively. The number in the top-left corner represents the mean value.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2294 KiB  
Article
Tenofovir and Doravirine Are Potential Reverse-Transcriptase Analogs in Combination with the New Reverse-Transcriptase Translocation Inhibitor (Islatravir) Among Treatment-Experienced Patients in Cameroon: Designing Future Treatment Strategies for Low- and Middle-Income Countries
by Alex Durand Nka, Yagai Bouba, Wilfried Rooker Tsapi Lontsi, Davy-Hyacinte Gouissi Anguechia, Georges Teto, Aude christelle Ka’e, Ezechiel Ngoufack Jagni Semengue, Collins Ambe Chenwi, Désiré Takou, Lum Forgwei, Tatiana Anim-Keng Tekoh, Aurelie Minelle Kengni Ngueko, Bernadette Bomgning Fokou, Jeremiah Efakika Gabisa, Michel Carlos Tommo Tchouaket, Willy Leroi TognaPabo, Derrick Tambe Ayuk Ngwese, Jacky Njiki Bikoi, Daniele Armenia, Vittorio Colizzi, Marcel Yotebieng, Nicaise Ndembi, Maria-Mercedes Santoro, Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein, Carlo-Federico Perno, Alexis Ndjolo and Joseph Fokamadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Viruses 2025, 17(1), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17010069 - 6 Jan 2025
Viewed by 838
Abstract
Islatravir (ISL) is a novel antiretroviral that inhibits HIV-1 reverse transcriptase translocation. The M184V mutation, known to reduce ISL’s viral susceptibility in vitro, could arise from prolonged exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) (3TC). This study evaluated the predictive efficacy of ISL [...] Read more.
Islatravir (ISL) is a novel antiretroviral that inhibits HIV-1 reverse transcriptase translocation. The M184V mutation, known to reduce ISL’s viral susceptibility in vitro, could arise from prolonged exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) (3TC). This study evaluated the predictive efficacy of ISL and identified potentially active antiretrovirals in combination among treatment-experienced patients in Cameroon, where NRTIs (3TC) have been the backbone of ART for decades now. Although ISL is a long-acting antiretroviral, it will provide other therapeutic options in combination with other reverse transcriptase inhibitors that remain effective. We analyzed 1170 HIV-1 sequences from patients failing first-, second-, and third-line ART using the CIRCB Antiviral Resistance Evaluation (CIRCB-CARE) database. Drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were interpreted using Stanford HIVdb.v9, and covariation patterns between M184V and major NRTI/NNRTI DRMs were assessed. The study population, with a median age of 40 years, showed a high prevalence of resistance to NRTIs (77.4%) and NNRTIs (49.2%). The most frequent NRTI DRMs were M184V/I (83.3%), M41L (25.0%), and T215FY (36.8%), while common NNRTI DRMs included K103NS (53.3%), Y181CIV (27.7%), and G190ASE (22.2%). In first-line ART failure, M184V significantly covaried with K70R, L74I, and M41L for NRTIs and K103N and G190A for NNRTIs. In second-line failure, the covariation with M184V extended to T215Y, M41L, and D67N for NRTIs and G190A, K103N, and K103S for NNRTIs. No significant covariation with M184V was observed in third-line treatment failures. Based on these covariations and on the effect of these mutations on available anti-HIV drugs, TDF (partial efficacy) and Doravirine (fully active) were identified as potentially suitable candidates in combination with ISL among patients failing the first, second, and third lines, and could serve as a valuable therapeutic option in LMICs facing similar treatment challenges. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Phylogenetic tree of the 1170 viral subtype distribution among HIV-1 infected patients failing ART, inferred using Nextstrain software version 3.10.0 [<a href="#B26-viruses-17-00069" class="html-bibr">26</a>] (<a href="https://clades.nextstrain.org" target="_blank">https://clades.nextstrain.org</a>, accessed on 8 February 2024).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) NRTI and (<b>b</b>) NNRTI major drug resistance mutations’ prevalence through the treatment lines, with the overall prevalence in grey.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Predictive antiretroviral susceptibility in Cameroon, derived from mutation prevalences. blue NRTIs; green NNRTIs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Clusters of correlated mutations in first-line ART. (<b>b</b>) Clusters of correlated mutations in second-line ART. (<b>c</b>) Clusters of correlated mutations in third-line ART. Dendrogram obtained from average linkage hierarchical agglomerative clustering, showing clusters of RT mutations. The length of branches reflects distances between mutations in the original distance matrix. Bootstrap values, indicating the significance of clusters (≥0.2), are reported in the boxes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Clusters of correlated mutations in first-line ART. (<b>b</b>) Clusters of correlated mutations in second-line ART. (<b>c</b>) Clusters of correlated mutations in third-line ART. Dendrogram obtained from average linkage hierarchical agglomerative clustering, showing clusters of RT mutations. The length of branches reflects distances between mutations in the original distance matrix. Bootstrap values, indicating the significance of clusters (≥0.2), are reported in the boxes.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 7398 KiB  
Article
Inter-Calibration and Limb Correction of FY-3D/E MWTS for Long-Term Gridded Microwave Brightness Temperature Dataset
by Xinlu Xia, Mingjian Zeng, Xiaochun Luo, Xiao Shi, Rongsheng Jiang, Xinyi Yuan, Xiaozhuo Sang, Fei Tang and Xu Xu
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010158 - 5 Jan 2025
Viewed by 488
Abstract
The Microwave Temperature Sounder-3 (MWTS-3) onboard the Chinese FengYun-3E (FY-3E) satellite is the third generation of Chinese microwave temperature sounder. Based on MWTS-2, the number of MWTS-3 channels has been increased from 13 to 17, which can observe the atmospheric temperature and water [...] Read more.
The Microwave Temperature Sounder-3 (MWTS-3) onboard the Chinese FengYun-3E (FY-3E) satellite is the third generation of Chinese microwave temperature sounder. Based on MWTS-2, the number of MWTS-3 channels has been increased from 13 to 17, which can observe the atmospheric temperature and water vapor profiles from the surface to the lower stratosphere. In this study, two generations of MWTSs onboard FY-3D/3E were inter-calibrated by the Double Difference (DD) method to eliminate bias. The results showed that the biases of tropospheric channels were stable (within 1 K) and the biases of stratospheric channels were relatively large (over 2 K). In addition, the weighting functions of all MWTS channels varied with fields of view (FOVs) due to different optical paths, causing the brightness temperature (TB) observations to display strong scan-dependent features, i.e., the limb effect. This work used a limb correction method to remove scan-dependent patterns so that the underlying weather signals could be uncovered. After inter-calibration and limb correction, this work converted the TB observations from MWTS-2/3 onto a global gridded dataset at 0.5° × 0.5° latitudinal and longitudinal resolutions using a method of nested interpolation. Based on this research, more long-term FengYun series satellite climate datasets can be established in the future. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Weighting functions (WFs) of FY-3E MWTS-3 channels 1–17 (including 13 channels same as MWTS-2 shown in black curves), calculated using Radiative Transfer for TOVS (RTTOV) with the U.S. standard atmosphere profile at nadir.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Monthly mean local equator-crossing times of FY-3D and FY-3E calculated from nadir observations on ascending (solid curves) and descending (dashed curves) nodes from January 2019 to June 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Weighting functions of MWTS-3 channel 7 at different scan angles of FOVs 1 (black), 15 (blue), 30 (green), and 45 (red) calculated by RTTOV using the U.S. standard atmosphere, 1976 (COESA 1976) profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>MWTS-3 channel 7 TBs observed on the ascending nodes on 1 January 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Ascending nodes from FY-3D (blue curve) and FY-3E (red curve) swaths on 1 January 2023 shown under a north-polar stereographic projection. (<b>b</b>) All SNO points between FY-3D and FY-3E from March 2022 to June 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>DD bias for all channels between MWTS-2 and MWTS-3 (mean value and standard deviation are indicated by black curves). Channel numbers in the figure are all from MWTS-3. (<b>a</b>) channels 3, 4, 5; (<b>b</b>) channels 7, 9, 10; (<b>c</b>) channels 11, 12, 13; (<b>d</b>) channels 14, 15, 16, 17.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Inter-sensor DD bias (blue solid curve) with standard deviation (red dashed curve) of MWTS channels between FY-3D and FY-3E.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flowchart of inter-calibration between MWTS-2 and MWTS-3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>MWTS-3 channel 7 mean TBs averaged at every scan position and in every 2° latitudinal band over global ocean. Data are from January 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Limb-corrected values of MWTS-3 channel 7 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>[</mo> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">b</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mrow> <mi>Ch</mi> <mn>7</mn> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi> </mrow> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo> </mo> <mo>-</mo> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">T</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">b</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>LC</mi> </mrow> </mrow> <mrow> <mrow> <mi>Ch</mi> <mn>7</mn> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi> </mrow> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> TBs (black contour lines at 2 K intervals) as a function of scan position and latitude at 2° intervals, as well as scan variations in the global mean TBs of channel 3, 7, 10, and 12 before (solid-colored curves) and after (dashed colored curves) the limb correction. MWTS-3 observations are collected from January 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>MWTS-3 channel 7 TBs observed on the ascending nodes on 15 January 2023 (<b>a</b>) before and (<b>b</b>) after the limb correction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Global distributions of gridded MWTS-3 channel-7 TB after nested interpolation on 15 January 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Flowchart for establishing multi-satellite MWTS gridded dataset.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 12806 KiB  
Article
Axial Compressive Behavior of Outer Square Inner Circular Spontaneous Combustion Coal Gangue Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Steel Tubular Stub Column
by Jinli Wang, Chunyuan Wang, Zhe Gao, Haoyan Wei, Zhengping Hu and Weiwei Wang
Buildings 2024, 14(12), 4064; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14124064 - 21 Dec 2024
Viewed by 440
Abstract
Utilizing crushed spontaneous combustion coal gangue as a coarse aggregate in concrete preparation effectively reduces reliance on natural resources and mitigates environmental pollution; however, the suboptimal workability of spontaneous combustion coal gangue coarse aggregate concrete (SCG-CAC) limits its engineering applications. To address this [...] Read more.
Utilizing crushed spontaneous combustion coal gangue as a coarse aggregate in concrete preparation effectively reduces reliance on natural resources and mitigates environmental pollution; however, the suboptimal workability of spontaneous combustion coal gangue coarse aggregate concrete (SCG-CAC) limits its engineering applications. To address this issue, this study places SCGCAC at the center of a CFDST (Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Steel Tubular) stub column. Through finite element modeling validated for reliability, this study examines the structural mechanical response to axial loading, along with the effects of various parameters. The analysis encompasses parameters such as the strength of the core SCGCAC (fc,i), the strength of the sandwiched concrete (fc,o), the yield strength of the outer steel tube (fy,o), the yield strength of the inner steel tube (fy,i), the width-to-thickness ratio (B/to), the diameter-to-thickness ratio of the inner tube (D/ti), and the diameter-to-width ratio of the outer tube (D/B). Results show that this structural configuration significantly enhances the core SCGCAC ultimate bearing capacity, and increases in D/ti, fc,i, fc,o, fy,i, and B/to all lead to an increase in the peak load. Particularly, when D/ti increases from 28.57 to 80, the peak load increases by 42.72%. However, changes in fy,o and D/B have no significant effect on the peak load. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable and Low-Carbon Building Materials and Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The SCGCA-CFDST stub column.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The constitutive behavior of concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The constitutive behavior of the steel tube.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Typical finite element model diagram. (<b>a</b>) Selection of element types for each part of typical finite element model. (<b>b</b>) Boundary conditions of typical finite element models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison between empirical data and computational simulation outcomes in [<a href="#B20-buildings-14-04064" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-buildings-14-04064" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of the load–strain curves obtained from experimental tests and those generated through simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Comparison of the load–strain curves obtained from experimental tests and those generated through simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Load–strain curves of typical SCGCA-CFST specimen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Longitudinal stress distribution of core SCGCAC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Longitudinal stress distribution of sandwiched concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Mises stress distribution of inner and outer steel tubes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Mises stress distribution in the middle section of inner steel tube.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The outer steel tube’s middle stress distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Mechanical action between inner steel tube and core coal gangue concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Interaction between inner steel tube and sandwiched concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Interaction between external steel tube and sandwiched concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Effect of strength of different core SCG-CAC on <span class="html-italic">N-ε</span> curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Effect of different sandwiched concrete strength on <span class="html-italic">N-ε</span> curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Effect of different yield strength of outer steel tubes on <span class="html-italic">N-ε</span> curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Effect of different yield strength of inner steel tubes on <span class="html-italic">N-ε</span> curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Effect of different diameter–thickness ratio of inner steel tube on <span class="html-italic">N-ε</span> curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Effect of different width–thickness ratios of outer steel tubes on <span class="html-italic">N-ε</span> curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Effect of different diameter–width ratios of inner and outer steel tubes on <span class="html-italic">N-ε</span> curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Comparison of predicted results with experimental and finite element results in [<a href="#B20-buildings-14-04064" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-buildings-14-04064" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 8899 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Satellite-Derived Atmospheric Temperature and Humidity Profiles and Their Application as Precursors to Severe Convective Precipitation
by Zhaokai Song, Weihua Bai, Yuanjie Zhang, Yuqi Wang, Xiaoze Xu and Jialing Xin
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4638; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244638 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 772
Abstract
This study evaluated the reliability of satellite-derived atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles derived from occultations of Fengyun-3D (FY-3D), the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate-2 (COSMIC-2), the Meteorological Operational Satellite program (METOP), and the microwave observations of NOAA Polar Orbital Environmental [...] Read more.
This study evaluated the reliability of satellite-derived atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles derived from occultations of Fengyun-3D (FY-3D), the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate-2 (COSMIC-2), the Meteorological Operational Satellite program (METOP), and the microwave observations of NOAA Polar Orbital Environmental Satellites (POES) using various conventional sounding datasets from 2020 to 2021. Satellite-derived profiles were also used to explore the precursors of severe convective precipitations in terms of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) characteristics and convective parameters. It was found that the satellite-derived temperature profiles exhibited high accuracy, with RMSEs from 0.75 K to 2.68 K, generally increasing with the latitude and decreasing with the altitude. Among these satellite-derived profile sources, the COSMIC-2-derived temperature profiles showed the highest accuracy in the middle- and low-latitude regions, while the METOP series had the best performance in high-latitude regions. Comparatively, the satellite-derived relative humidity profiles had lower accuracy, with RMSEs from 13.72% to 24.73%, basically increasing with latitude. The METOP-derived humidity profiles were overall the most reliable among the different data sources. The ABL temperature and humidity structures from these satellite-derived profiles showed different characteristics between severe precipitation and non-precipitation regions and could reflect the evolution of ABL characteristics during a severe convective precipitation event. Furthermore, some convective parameters calculated from the satellite-derived profiles showed significant and rapid changes before the severe precipitation, indicating the feasibility of using satellite-derived temperature and humidity profiles as precursors to severe convective precipitation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Profile examples of the three occultation datasets: (<b>a</b>) COSMIC-2, (<b>b</b>) METOP, (<b>c</b>) FY-3D. The orange points represent the original profile data, while the red points indicate the profile data interpolated to fixed pressure levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of all datasets at one certain hour (12:00 UTC, 4 January 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Global horizontal distribution of each satellite profile dataset in July 2021: (<b>a</b>) FY-3D, (<b>b</b>) COSMIC-2, (<b>c</b>) METOP, and (<b>d</b>) POES.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Vertical distribution of each satellite profile dataset in July 2021: (<b>a</b>) COSMIC-2, (<b>b</b>) METOP, and (<b>c</b>) FY-3D. The vertical axis represents pressure, while the horizontal axis indicates the total number of observations within different pressure ranges over an entire month.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Density estimation scatter plot of RMSE/MBE calculated from satellite-derived temperature profiles and matching sounding profiles as a function of distance. The horizontal axis represents the distance between the satellite profiles and the matched sounding profiles. The horizontal axis represents the RMSE (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and MBE (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) between the four types of satellite profiles and matching sounding profiles, with units in Kelvin (K).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Density estimation scatter plot of RMSE/MBE calculated from satellite-derived humidity profiles and matching sounding profiles as a function of distance. The horizontal axis represents the distance between the satellite profiles and the matched sounding profiles. The horizontal axis represents the RMSE (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and MBE (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) between the four types of satellite profiles and matching sounding profiles, with units in %.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison between four types of satellite-derived temperature profiles: (<b>a</b>) FY-3D, (<b>b</b>) POES, (<b>c</b>) METOP, (<b>d</b>) COSMIC-2 and radiosonde profiles at various latitude regions and altitudes. Solid lines represent the mean bias error (MBE, unit: K), dashed lines represent the root mean square error (RMSE, unit: K), the vertical axis represents the pressure levels (unit: hPa), and the three colors represent the low-, mid-, and high-latitude regions, respectively, while the black vertical dashed line indicates the zero value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison between four types of satellite-derived humidity profiles: (<b>a</b>) FY-3D, (<b>b</b>) POES, (<b>c</b>) METOP, (<b>d</b>) COSMIC-2 and radiosonde profiles at various latitude regions and altitudes. Solid lines represent the mean bias error (MBE, unit: %), dashed lines represent the root mean square error (RMSE, unit: %), the vertical axis represents the pressure levels (unit: hPa), and the three colors represent the low-, mid-, and high-latitude regions, respectively, while the black vertical dashed line indicates the zero value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Kernel density estimation plots for the four types of satellite-derived temperature profiles: (<b>a1</b>–<b>c1</b>) POES, (<b>a2</b>–<b>c2</b>) FY-3D, (<b>a3</b>–<b>c3</b>) METOP, (<b>a4</b>,<b>b4</b>) COSMIC-2 and radiosonde profiles. Both the horizontal and vertical axes represent temperature (unit: Kelvin). The bold <b>R</b> represents the results obtained through a significance test at the 0.05 level. The straight line has a slope of 1, and the shading of the fill reflects the data probability in different areas. Results are presented from left to right for low-, mid-, and high-latitude regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Kernel density estimation plots for the four types of satellite-derived humidity profiles: (<b>a1</b>–<b>c1</b>) POES, (<b>a2</b>–<b>c2</b>) FY-3D, (<b>a3</b>–<b>c3</b>) METOP, (<b>a4</b>,<b>b4</b>) COSMIC-2 and radiosonde profiles. Both the horizontal and vertical axes represent relative humidity (unit: %). The bold <b>R</b> represents the results obtained through a significance test at the 0.05 level. Results are presented from left to right for low-, mid-, and high-latitude regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The precipitation rate variation for the selected area from 00:00 to 22:00 on July 20 is shown in (<b>a</b>–<b>l</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>POES-derived temperature and humidity profiles in the precipitation area (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and non-precipitation area (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) at 03:00 UTC on 20 July 2021. Corresponding precipitation rates (<b>g</b>) are given in mm/h. The red stars indicate the locations of the profile observations. Left to right in (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represent the dewpoint temperature profiles (K) and temperature profiles (K), potential temperature profiles (K), and specific humidity profiles (g/kg).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Precipitation rates (mm/h) in the selected precipitation area (rectangular box in the figure), showing (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) the period before precipitation, (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) during precipitation, and (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) after precipitation. Different colored stars represent the profile observation locations from different datasets. The red stars indicate the locations of the profile observations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Temperature and humidity profiles in the selected area showing (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) before precipitation, (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) during precipitation, and (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) after precipitation. The numerical values in the top right corner indicate the average precipitation rate in the area, in mm/h. From left to right in (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) represents the dewpoint temperature profiles (K) and temperature profiles (K), potential temperature profiles (K), and specific humidity profiles (g/kg).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The average precipitation rate (mm/h) of the selected area varies with time (<b>a</b>) and the error bars of convective parameters during the precipitation process: (<b>b</b>) MUCAPE (J/kg), (<b>c</b>) MUCIN (J/kg), (<b>d</b>) LCL (km), (<b>e</b>) LFC (km), (<b>f</b>) K_index (K), (<b>g</b>) Lift (K), (<b>h</b>) Si (K), (<b>i</b>) lapse_rate (K/km), (<b>j</b>) Static_stability (K/hPa), (<b>k</b>) Moist_static_energy (J/kg), (<b>l</b>) RH. Each blue box represents the interquartile range, with the upper edge corresponding to the 75th percentile, the line inside the box indicating the 50th percentile, and the lower edge representing the 25th percentile. The red dots represent the mean value of the data, while the red crosses represent outliers.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 1862 KiB  
Article
Thymidine Analogue Mutations with M184V Significantly Decrease Phenotypic Susceptibility of HIV-1 Subtype C Reverse Transcriptase to Islatravir
by Hyeonah Byun, Maria Antonia Papathanasopoulos, Kim Steegen and Adriaan Erasmus Basson
Viruses 2024, 16(12), 1888; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16121888 - 6 Dec 2024
Viewed by 997
Abstract
Islatravir (ISL) is the first-in-class nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTtI) with novel modes of action. Data on ISL resistance are currently limited, particularly to HIV-1 non-B subtypes. This study aimed to assess prevalent nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-resistant mutations in HIV-1 subtype [...] Read more.
Islatravir (ISL) is the first-in-class nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTtI) with novel modes of action. Data on ISL resistance are currently limited, particularly to HIV-1 non-B subtypes. This study aimed to assess prevalent nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-resistant mutations in HIV-1 subtype C for their phenotypic resistance to ISL. Prevalent single and combinations of NRTI-resistant mutations were selected from a routine HIV-1 genotypic drug resistance testing database and introduced into HIV-1 subtype C-like pseudoviruses, which were then tested for ISL susceptibility. Single NRTI-resistant mutations were susceptible or showed only a low level of resistance to ISL. This included thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs, i.e., M41L, D67N, K70R, T215FY, and K219EQ) and non-TAMs (i.e., A62V, K65R, K70ET, L74IV, A114S, Y115F, and M184V). Combinations of M184V with one or more additional NRTI-resistant mutations generally displayed reduced ISL susceptibilities. This was more prominent for combinations that included M184V+TAMs, and particularly M184V+TAM-2 mutations. Combinations that included M184V+K65R did not impact significantly on ISL susceptibility. Our study suggests that ISL would be effective in treating people living with HIV (PLWH) failing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/lamivudine (3TC) or TDF/emtricitabine (FTC)-containing regimens, but would be less effective in PLH failing zidovudine (AZT) with 3TC or FTC-containing regimens. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Variation in IC<sub>50</sub> and fold-change of ISL against wild-type PSV. (<b>A</b>) Multiple independent in vitro assays (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 41) were conducted to determine the IC<sub>50</sub> of ISL against the wild-type HIV-1 subtype C virus (i.e., p8.9MJ4). The mean IC<sub>50</sub> = 8.32 nM ± 4.99 nM (median IC<sub>50</sub> = 7.27 nM, IQR 4.16–12.88). (<b>B</b>) Each IC<sub>50</sub> value was divided by the mean IC<sub>50</sub> value to determine the fold-change (FC). The mean FC was, therefore, 1.0 ± 0.6 FC (median FC = 0.87, IQR 0.54–1.55). Technical cut-off (TCO): obtained from the 99th percentile of the IC<sub>50</sub> values. (<b>C</b>) Multiple independent in vitro assays (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 13) were conducted to determine the IC<sub>50</sub> value of ISL against the wild-type HIV-1 subtype B virus (i.e., p8.9NSX). The mean IC<sub>50</sub> concentration was shown to be 7.91 nM ± 5.51 nM (median IC<sub>50</sub> = 5.90 nM, IQR 2.58–13.32). (<b>D</b>) Each IC<sub>50</sub> value was divided by the mean IC<sub>50</sub> value to obtain a mean FC value of 1 (median FC = 0.74, IQR 0.33–1.68).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Fold-change in IC<sub>50</sub> of single mutants in subtype C PSVs compared to the wild-type PSV. Following the in vitro phenotypic activity assays, the IC<sub>50</sub> values for each mutant was compared against the mean IC<sub>50</sub> of the MJ4 wild-type PSV, allowing the determination of fold changes. The 99th percentile of variation in the wild-type IC<sub>50</sub> value, calculated to be 2.2 (TCO), served as the threshold for categorizing mutants as either susceptible or having a decreased susceptibility to ISL. Among the single mutants, M41L, K65R, D67N, K70E/R/T, L74I, A114S, Y115F, T215F, and K219E/Q demonstrated susceptibility to ISL. In contrast, A62V, L74V, and T215Y exhibited potential low-level resistance, and M184V exhibited potential-low- to low-level resistance. Susceptible (<span class="html-italic">n</span>), potential-low-level resistance (<span class="html-italic">n</span>), low-level resistance (<span class="html-italic">n</span>), intermediate resistance (<span class="html-italic">n</span>), and high-level resistance (<span class="html-italic">n</span>). Data are shown as median bar graphs with the IQR as error bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Single mutant L74V in wild-type HIV-1 subtype B and C laboratory-adapted strains. A phenotypic activity assay was conducted to determine whether ISL had similar potencies against the single mutant L74V in different wild-type strains and subtypes of HIV-1. IC<sub>50</sub> values are expressed as median fold-change differences to the IC<sub>50</sub> of the relevant control subtype, with the IQR as error bars. The TCO for each subtype is indicated on the graph by a dotted line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>IC<sub>50</sub> values of L74V in laboratory-adapted PSVs and inter-subtype Kruskal–Wallis test. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed to introduce the L74V mutant into the wild-type p8.9NSX and p8.9MJ4, and laboratory-adapted strains. (<b>A</b>) Median IC<sub>50</sub> values of the L74V mutation in laboratory-adapted strains show that the LTNP5 PSV has the highest median IC<sub>50</sub> of 9.76 nM (IQR 6.27–9.98). DS9 had the lowest median IC<sub>50</sub> of 2.31 nM (IQR 1.78–4.20). Data are shown as median bar graphs with the IQR. (<b>B</b>) Inter-subtype non-parametric statistical analysis was performed using a Kruskal–Wallis multiple comparisons test. The grid shows the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values of the comparisons in IC<sub>50</sub> values. No significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05) were observed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Fold-change in IC<sub>50</sub> of mutation combinations in subtype C PSVs compared to the wild-type MJ4 PSV. Following the in vitro phenotypic activity assays, the IC<sub>50</sub> value for each mutant was compared against the mean IC<sub>50</sub> of the MJ4 wild-type PSV, allowing for the determination of fold changes. The 99th percentile of variation in the wild-type IC<sub>50</sub> value, calculated to be 2.2 (TCO), served as the threshold for categorizing mutants as either susceptible or resistant to ISL. It was observed that the combination of NRTI mutations generally increased resistance to ISL. The A114S/M184V mutation combination showed a very high level of resistance to ISL. Its IC<sub>50</sub> value was greater than the highest ISL concentration tested, and consequently, its FC value was &gt; 60. Susceptible (<span class="html-italic">n</span>), potential-low-level resistance (<span class="html-italic">n</span>), low-level resistance (<span class="html-italic">n</span>), intermediate resistance (<span class="html-italic">n</span>), and high-level resistance (<span class="html-italic">n</span>). Data are shown as median bar graphs with the IQR as error bars.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 2100 KiB  
Communication
Biocontrol Potential of Streptomyces Strain FY4 Against Heterobasidion Root Rot Pathogen In Vitro
by Yilin Li, Xuehai Li, Li Geng, Shijie Li, Ziwen Gao, Lin Huang, Lu-Min Vaario and Hui Sun
Forests 2024, 15(12), 2124; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122124 - 1 Dec 2024
Viewed by 882
Abstract
Root and butt rot, caused by Heterobasidion species, poses a significant threat to coniferous forests in the Northern Hemisphere. Innovative and effective strategies are crucial to enhance the control of this disease. This study aimed at identifying a Streptomyces strain, FY4, and evaluating [...] Read more.
Root and butt rot, caused by Heterobasidion species, poses a significant threat to coniferous forests in the Northern Hemisphere. Innovative and effective strategies are crucial to enhance the control of this disease. This study aimed at identifying a Streptomyces strain, FY4, and evaluating its biocontrol potential against H. annosum and H. parviporum. Strain FY4 was identified as Streptomyces blastmyceticus based on morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics, supported by a multigene phylogenetic analysis using the 16S rRNA, atpD, rpoB, and trpB genes. In vitro dual-culture experiments showed that S. blastmyceticus exhibited antagonistic activity against both H. annosum and H. parviporum, with an inhibition zone diameter exceeding 15 mm. Moreover, the fermentation broth of S. blastmyceticus FY4 displayed significant inhibitory effects on the mycelial growth and spore germination of both Heterobasidion species. At a 10% concentration, the fermentation broth inhibited the mycelial growth by over 90% and reduced the spore germination rate by more than 60%. Additionally, the fermentation broth exhibited significant inhibitory effects on the mycelial growth of four common pathogenic fungi—Phytophthora cinnamomi, P. sojae, Rhizoctonia solani, and Verticillium dahlia, with an inhibition rate over 50%. These findings suggest that S. blastmyceticus FY4 produces antifungal substances capable of effectively suppressing infection of Heterobasidion species in conifers. Consequently, strain FY4 holds great promise as a biological control agent for managing root and butt rot caused by these pathogens, as well as potential for controlling other fungal diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Colony morphological characteristics of strain FY4 on different media. (<b>a</b>) Gauze’s Medium No. 1; (<b>b</b>) Czapek’s Medium; (<b>c</b>) glucose aspartate agar medium; (<b>d</b>) ISP1 medium; (<b>e</b>) ISP2 medium; (<b>f</b>) ISP3 medium; (<b>g</b>) ISP4 medium; (<b>h</b>) ISP5 medium.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Maximum-likelihood tree obtained from the combined 16s rRNA, <span class="html-italic">atpD</span>, <span class="html-italic">rpoB</span>, and <span class="html-italic">trpB</span> genes of strain FY4. <span class="html-italic">Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv</span> was used as the outgroup. Numbers at the branches indicate the percentage of replicate trees in which associated taxa clustered in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Inhibitory effect of strain FY4 mycelium and fermentation broth against <span class="html-italic">Heterobasidion</span> spp. (<b>a</b>) Strain FY4 mycelium against <span class="html-italic">Heterobasidion</span> spp. in Petri dishes after 7 days (n = 3). (<b>b</b>) Inhibition zone diameter of strain FY4 mycelium on mycelium growth of <span class="html-italic">H. annosum</span> and <span class="html-italic">H. parviporum</span> (n = 3). (<b>c</b>) Inhibition rate of strain FY4 fermentation broth on mycelial growth of <span class="html-italic">Heterobasidion</span> spp. over 10 days (n = 3). (<b>d</b>) Growth of <span class="html-italic">Heterobasidion</span> spp. on medium containing strain FY4 broth. CK: Control.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Inhibition rate of strain FY4 fermentation broth on <span class="html-italic">Heterobasidion</span> spore germination and on mycelial growth of <span class="html-italic">Phytophthora cinnamomi</span>, <span class="html-italic">P. sojae</span>, <span class="html-italic">Rhizoctonia solani</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Verticillium dahlia</span>. (<b>a</b>) Inhibition rate of strain FY4 fermentation broth on <span class="html-italic">Heterobasidion</span> spore germination (n = 3). The lowercase letters of the same color indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0. 05) between different treatments. (<b>b</b>) Linear regression fitting of inhibition rate of strain FY4 fermentation broth on the mycelial growth of <span class="html-italic">P. cinnamomi</span> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.98), <span class="html-italic">P. sojae</span> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.844), <span class="html-italic">R. solani</span> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.89), and <span class="html-italic">V. dahliae</span> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.71) (n = 3).</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 9852 KiB  
Article
A Case Study on the Impact of Boundary Layer Turbulence on Convective Clouds in the Eastern Margin of the Tibetan Plateau
by Ting Wang, Maoshan Li, Yonghao Jiang, Yuchen Liu, Ming Gong, Shaoyang Wang, Peng Sun, Yaoming Ma and Fanglin Sun
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4376; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234376 - 23 Nov 2024
Viewed by 566
Abstract
In this study, we utilized ECMWF Reanalysis of the Global Climate at Atmospheric Resolution 5 (ERA5) data, FengYun-4B satellite (FY-4B) data, a Wind3D 6000 Three-Dimensional Scanning Laser Wind Radar, and raindrop spectrum data to analyze the circulation background, convective cloud changes, boundary layer [...] Read more.
In this study, we utilized ECMWF Reanalysis of the Global Climate at Atmospheric Resolution 5 (ERA5) data, FengYun-4B satellite (FY-4B) data, a Wind3D 6000 Three-Dimensional Scanning Laser Wind Radar, and raindrop spectrum data to analyze the circulation background, convective cloud changes, boundary layer wind field variations, and precipitation drop size spectrum characteristics of a severe convective rainfall process that occurred on 3 April 2024 in the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. The findings indicated the following: (1) The rain belt of this precipitation event showed a southwest–northeast trend. During the vigorous development of convection, the rainfall intensity and total precipitation at the station increased, with a wider raindrop spectrum, and the raindrop spectrum of this precipitation process was unimodal. (2) On 3 April, the interaction between the eastward movement of the plateau trough at 500 hPa and the upper-level jet stream at 200 hPa in the eastern Tibetan Plateau and the Sichuan Basin area, along with the necessary conditions for precipitation, such as energy and moisture, led to severe convective rainfall. (3) This intense convective precipitation process was caused by the vigorous convective clouds that developed in the eastern part of the Tibetan Plateau. As these clouds developed and moved eastward out of the plateau, they precipitated with increased turbulence intensity at the station, leading to the generation of intense convective activities at the site. (4) One hour before the precipitation, there were significant increases in horizontal wind speed, vertical air velocity, and turbulence intensity within the boundary layer, and there were also significant changes in the horizontal wind direction. The results obtained can provide important theoretical references for the prediction of severe convective rainfall and the performance of numerical simulations thereon. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The topography of the study area and location of the observation point. Height unit: m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>GPM precipitation map. Unit: mm. (<b>a</b>) is the cumulative precipitation distribution for 3 April. The red triangles in the map show station locations. (<b>b</b>) shows the precipitation distribution from 02:30 to 04:00, (<b>c</b>) shows the precipitation distribution from 04:00 to 07:00, and (<b>d</b>) shows the precipitation distribution from 07:00 to 12:30.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>GPM precipitation map. Unit: mm. (<b>a</b>) is the cumulative precipitation distribution for 3 April. The red triangles in the map show station locations. (<b>b</b>) shows the precipitation distribution from 02:30 to 04:00, (<b>c</b>) shows the precipitation distribution from 04:00 to 07:00, and (<b>d</b>) shows the precipitation distribution from 07:00 to 12:30.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The distribution of raindrop spectral concentrations (unit: m<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>−1</sup>), rain intensity (unit: mm/h), and precipitation at Emei Mountain on 3 April. (<b>a</b>) shows the concentration distribution of raindrop spectra and Gamma simulation at the Emei Mountain station on 3 April, (<b>b</b>) shows the hour-by-hour concentration distribution of raindrop spectra at the Emei Mountain station on 3 April, (<b>c</b>) shows the hour-by-hour average and maximum rainfall intensity, and (<b>d</b>) shows the hour-by-hour precipitation as a percentage of the total precipitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>The distribution of raindrop spectral concentrations (unit: m<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>−1</sup>), rain intensity (unit: mm/h), and precipitation at Emei Mountain on 3 April. (<b>a</b>) shows the concentration distribution of raindrop spectra and Gamma simulation at the Emei Mountain station on 3 April, (<b>b</b>) shows the hour-by-hour concentration distribution of raindrop spectra at the Emei Mountain station on 3 April, (<b>c</b>) shows the hour-by-hour average and maximum rainfall intensity, and (<b>d</b>) shows the hour-by-hour precipitation as a percentage of the total precipitation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Geopotential height maps at 200 hPa, 500 hPa, and 700 hPa at 20:00 on 2 April and 08:00 on 3 April. Units: dagpm. (<b>a</b>) is the geopotential height map at 200 hPa at 20:00, (<b>b</b>) is the geopotential height map at 200 hPa at 08:00, (<b>c</b>) is the geopotential height map at 500 hPa at 20:00, (<b>d</b>) is the geopotential height map at 500 hPa at 08:00, (<b>e</b>) is the geopotential height map at 700 hPa at 20:00, and (<b>f</b>) is the geopotential height map at 700 hPa at 08:00.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Divergence map at 200 hPa and vorticity map at 700 hPa at 20:00 on 2 April. Units: 10<sup>−4</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. (<b>a</b>) is the vorticity map at 700 hPa at 20:00 and (<b>b</b>) is the divergence map at 200 hPa at 20:00.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The vertically integrated water vapor flux divergence maps (units: 10<sup>−5</sup>∙kg/(m<sup>2</sup>∙s)) and horizontal water vapor flux maps (units: kg/(m∙s)) at 20:00 on 2 April and 08:00 on 3 April. (<b>a</b>) is the water vapor flux divergence map at 20:00, (<b>b</b>) is the water vapor flux map at 20:00, (<b>c</b>) is the water vapor flux divergence map at 08:00, and (<b>d</b>) is the water vapor flux map at 08:00.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>The vertically integrated water vapor flux divergence maps (units: 10<sup>−5</sup>∙kg/(m<sup>2</sup>∙s)) and horizontal water vapor flux maps (units: kg/(m∙s)) at 20:00 on 2 April and 08:00 on 3 April. (<b>a</b>) is the water vapor flux divergence map at 20:00, (<b>b</b>) is the water vapor flux map at 20:00, (<b>c</b>) is the water vapor flux divergence map at 08:00, and (<b>d</b>) is the water vapor flux map at 08:00.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cloud type maps from FY-4B data on 3 April. (<b>a</b>) is at 02:00, (<b>b</b>) is at 05:00, (<b>c</b>) is at 07:00, and (<b>d</b>) is at 10:00. The red triangles in the figures indicate the station’s location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cloud top height maps from FY-4B data on 3 April (units: m). (<b>a</b>) is at 02:00, (<b>b</b>) is at 05:00, (<b>c</b>) is at 07:00, and (<b>d</b>) is at 10:00. The red triangles in the figures indicate the station’s location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Cloud top height maps from FY-4B data on 3 April (units: m). (<b>a</b>) is at 02:00, (<b>b</b>) is at 05:00, (<b>c</b>) is at 07:00, and (<b>d</b>) is at 10:00. The red triangles in the figures indicate the station’s location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Cloud top brightness temperature maps from FY-4B data on 3 April (units: K). (<b>a</b>) is at 05:00, (<b>b</b>) is at 06:00, (<b>c</b>) is at 07:00, and (<b>d</b>) is at 08:00. The black triangles in the figures indicate the station’s location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Cloud top brightness temperature maps from FY-4B data on 3 April (units: K). (<b>a</b>) is at 05:00, (<b>b</b>) is at 06:00, (<b>c</b>) is at 07:00, and (<b>d</b>) is at 08:00. The black triangles in the figures indicate the station’s location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The time–height variation diagrams of wind speed, wind direction, and vertical velocity at the Emei Mountain Station from 00:00 to 03:00 and 12:00 to 16:00 on 3 April. Units: m/s. (<b>a</b>) is the wind speed and direction map from 00:00 to 03:00, (<b>b</b>) is the vertical velocity map from 00:00 to 03:00, (<b>c</b>) is the wind speed and direction map from 12:00 to 16:00, and (<b>d</b>) is the vertical velocity map from 12:00 to 16:00.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The time–height variation diagrams of turbulence intensity at the Emei Mountain Station from 00:00 to 03:00 and 12:00 to 16:00 on 3 April, and the cloud top height map obtained by the FY-4B satellite at 03:00 on 3 April. (<b>a</b>) is the turbulence intensity map from 00:00 to 03:00, (<b>b</b>) is the turbulence intensity map from 12:00 to 16:00, and (<b>c</b>) is the cloud top height map.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 6494 KiB  
Article
Reconstruction of Fine-Spatial-Resolution FY-3D-Based Vegetation Indices to Achieve Farmland-Scale Winter Wheat Yield Estimation via Fusion with Sentinel-2 Data
by Xijia Zhou, Tao Wang, Wei Zheng, Mingwei Zhang and Yuanyuan Wang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(22), 4143; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224143 - 6 Nov 2024
Viewed by 906
Abstract
The spatial resolution (250–1000 m) of the FY-3D MERSI is too coarse for agricultural monitoring at the farmland scale (20–30 m). To achieve the winter wheat yield (WWY) at the farmland scale, based on FY-3D, a method framework is developed in this work. [...] Read more.
The spatial resolution (250–1000 m) of the FY-3D MERSI is too coarse for agricultural monitoring at the farmland scale (20–30 m). To achieve the winter wheat yield (WWY) at the farmland scale, based on FY-3D, a method framework is developed in this work. The enhanced deep convolutional spatiotemporal fusion network (EDCSTFN) was used to perform a spatiotemporal fusion on the 10 day interval FY-3D and Sentinel-2 vegetation indices (VIs), which were compared with the enhanced spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (ESTARFM). In addition, a BP neural network was built to calculate the farmland-scale WWY based on the fused VIs, and the Aqua MODIS gross primary productivity product was used as ancillary data for WWY estimation. The results reveal that both the EDCSTFN and ESTARFM achieve satisfactory precision in the fusion of the Sentinel-2 and FY-3D VIs; however, when the period of spatiotemporal data fusion is relatively long, the EDCSTFN can achieve greater precision than ESTARFM. Finally, the WWY estimation results based on the fused VIs show remarkable correlations with the WWY data at the county scale and provide abundant spatial distribution details about the WWY, displaying great potential for accurate farmland-scale WWY estimations based on reconstructed fine-spatial-temporal-resolution FY-3D data. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the study region: (<b>a</b>) location of the Weihe Plain; (<b>b</b>) FY-3D false colour composite image for 3 May 2020; and (<b>c</b>) locations of the county-scale WWY data points used in the WWY estimation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of the 10 day interval VI imagery reconstruction and farmland-scale WWY estimation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of farmland-scale WWY estimation: (<b>a</b>) Y estimation model based on the cumulative GPP; and (<b>b</b>) farmland-scale Y estimation model based on multiple parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Results of the consistency analysis of the Sentinel-2 and FY-3D VIs: (<b>a</b>) R<sup>2</sup> values between the aggregated Sentinel-2 VI imagery and the FY-3D VI imagery at an SR of 250 m; and (<b>b</b>) average deviations and RMSE values of the fitting results between the aggregated Sentinel-2 VI imagery and FY-3D VI imagery. The error line in (<b>b</b>) denotes the RMSE of the fitting results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>EVI at each WW growing stage from 2020 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Y estimation model based on the cumulative GPP for the main WW growing period and the Y estimation precision evaluation results in 2020 and 2021. The dotted lines in the figures denote the fitted linear functions, which are close to the diagonal solid lines, indicating that the systematic deviation in the Y estimation results is small. (<b>a</b>) Linear regression model between the cumulative GPP data for the main WW growing period and the county-scale WWY from 2014 to 2018, (<b>b</b>) linear regression results between the WWY estimation results from 2020 based on the cumulative GPP and county-scale Y statistical data, and (<b>c</b>) linear regression results between the WWY estimation results in 2021 based on the cumulative GPP and county-scale Y statistical data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>WWY estimation results for 2020 to 2022 based on the MODIS cumulative GPP data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Farmland-scale WWY estimation results for the Weihe Plain from 2020 to 2022 based on multiple parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Linear regression results between the farmland-scale WWY estimation results and the Y statistical data in 2020 and 2021. The dotted lines in the figures denote the fitted linear functions, which are close to the diagonal solid lines, indicating that the systematic deviation of the Y estimation results is small.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 5140 KiB  
Article
Distribution-Based Approach for Efficient Storage and Indexing of Massive Infrared Hyperspectral Sounding Data
by Han Li, Mingjian Gu, Guang Shi, Yong Hu and Mengzhen Xie
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 4088; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16214088 - 1 Nov 2024
Viewed by 856
Abstract
Hyperspectral infrared atmospheric sounding data, characterized by their high vertical resolution, play a crucial role in capturing three-dimensional atmospheric spatial information. The hyperspectral infrared atmospheric detectors HIRAS/HIRAS-II, mounted on the FY3D/EF satellite, have established an initial global coverage network for atmospheric sounding. The [...] Read more.
Hyperspectral infrared atmospheric sounding data, characterized by their high vertical resolution, play a crucial role in capturing three-dimensional atmospheric spatial information. The hyperspectral infrared atmospheric detectors HIRAS/HIRAS-II, mounted on the FY3D/EF satellite, have established an initial global coverage network for atmospheric sounding. The collaborative observation approach involving multiple satellites will improve both the coverage and responsiveness of data acquisition, thereby enhancing the overall quality and reliability of the data. In response to the increasing number of channels, the rapid growth of data volume, and the specific requirements of multi-satellite joint observation applications with infrared hyperspectral sounding data, this paper introduces an efficient storage and indexing method for infrared hyperspectral sounding data within a distributed architecture for the first time. The proposed approach, built on the Kubernetes cloud platform, utilizes the Google S2 discrete grid spatial indexing algorithm to establish a grid-based hierarchical model for unified metadata-embedded documents. Additionally, it optimizes the rowkey design using the BPDS model, thereby enabling the distributed storage of data in HBase. The experimental results demonstrate that the query efficiency of the Google S2 grid-based embedded document model is superior to that of the traditional flat model, achieving a query time that is only 35.6% of the latter for a dataset of 5 million records. Additionally, this method exhibits better data distribution characteristics within the global grid compared to the H3 algorithm. Leveraging the BPDS model, the HBase distributed storage system adeptly balances the node load and counteracts the detrimental effects caused by the accumulation of time-series remote sensing images. This architecture significantly enhances both storage and query efficiency, thus laying a robust foundation for forthcoming distributed computing. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of ground field-of-view arrangement for the HIRAS series detector [<a href="#B36-remotesensing-16-04088" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B37-remotesensing-16-04088" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The system architecture for the efficient storage and indexing of hyperspectral infrared sounding data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A schematic diagram of the design structure of rowkeys.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The table structure of infrared hyperspectral sounding data in HBase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Collections on MongoDB cluster.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The relationship between coding level and grid resolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of loading times by various index methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of storage structure in MongoDB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Grid-based heatmap visualization of different methods: (<b>a</b>) Google S2 algorithm; (<b>b</b>) H3 algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The histogram of pixels of grids in different methods: (<b>a</b>) Google S2 algorithm; (<b>b</b>) H3 algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Query time and storage time are utilized as comparative metrics to assess performance by different methods: (<b>a</b>) storage time and (<b>b</b>) query time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Distribution of regions in different models: (<b>a</b>) DP model, (<b>b</b>) FP model, and (<b>c</b>) BPDS model.</p>
Full article ">
35 pages, 7235 KiB  
Article
Change in Fractional Vegetation Cover and Its Prediction during the Growing Season Based on Machine Learning in Southwest China
by Xiehui Li, Yuting Liu and Lei Wang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3623; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193623 - 28 Sep 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1012
Abstract
Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is a crucial indicator for measuring the growth of surface vegetation. The changes and predictions of FVC significantly impact biodiversity conservation, ecosystem health and stability, and climate change response and prediction. Southwest China (SWC) is characterized by complex topography, [...] Read more.
Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is a crucial indicator for measuring the growth of surface vegetation. The changes and predictions of FVC significantly impact biodiversity conservation, ecosystem health and stability, and climate change response and prediction. Southwest China (SWC) is characterized by complex topography, diverse climate types, and rich vegetation types. This study first analyzed the spatiotemporal variation of FVC at various timescales in SWC from 2000 to 2020 using FVC values derived from pixel dichotomy model. Next, we constructed four machine learning models—light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), support vector regression (SVR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and ridge regression (RR)—along with a weighted average heterogeneous ensemble model (WAHEM) to predict growing-season FVC in SWC from 2000 to 2023. Finally, the performance of the different ML models was comprehensively evaluated using tenfold cross-validation and multiple performance metrics. The results indicated that the overall FVC in SWC predominantly increased from 2000 to 2020. Over the 21 years, the FVC spatial distribution in SWC generally showed a high east and low west pattern, with extremely low FVC in the western plateau of Tibet and higher FVC in parts of eastern Sichuan, Chongqing, Guizhou, and Yunnan. The determination coefficient R2 scores from tenfold cross-validation for the four ML models indicated that LightGBM had the strongest predictive ability whereas RR had the weakest. WAHEM and LightGBM models performed the best overall in the training, validation, and test sets, with RR performing the worst. The predicted spatial change trends were consistent with the MODIS-MOD13A3-FVC and FY3D-MERSI-FVC, although the predicted FVC values were slightly higher but closer to the MODIS-MOD13A3-FVC. The feature importance scores from the LightGBM model indicated that digital elevation model (DEM) had the most significant influence on FVC among the six input features. In contrast, soil surface water retention capacity (SSWRC) was the most influential climate factor. The results of this study provided valuable insights and references for monitoring and predicting the vegetation cover in regions with complex topography, diverse climate types, and rich vegetation. Additionally, they offered guidance for selecting remote sensing products for vegetation cover and optimizing different ML models. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location (<b>a</b>), elevation distribution (<b>b</b>) and the average NDVI values for 2020 (<b>c</b>) in Southwest China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Density scatter plots of the annual average FVC during 2000–2020 between the FVC dataset calculated in this study and the published GLASS FVC product. (<b>a</b>) 2000, (<b>b</b>) 2007, (<b>c</b>) 2014, (<b>d</b>) 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution of FVC across different timescales from 2000 to 2020 in southwest China. (<b>a</b>) Annual, (<b>b</b>) growing season, (<b>c</b>) spring, (<b>d</b>) summer, (<b>e</b>) autumn, and (<b>f</b>) winter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial change trend of FVC across different timescales from 2000 to 2020 in southwest China. (<b>a</b>) Annual, (<b>b</b>) growing season, (<b>c</b>) spring, (<b>d</b>) summer, (<b>e</b>) autumn, and (<b>f</b>) winter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial variation of FVC classification in growing season from 2000 to 2020. (<b>a</b>) 2000, (<b>b</b>) 2007, (<b>c</b>) 2014, (<b>d</b>) 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The area ratio changes in FVC classification during the growing season from 2000 to 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><span class="html-italic">R</span><sup>2</sup> score from tenfold cross-validation for various models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distribution of FVC predicted by different ML models and retrieved calculation from satellite products during the growing seasons from 2021 to 2023. (<b>a</b>) LightGBM-2021, (<b>b</b>) LightGBM-2022, (<b>c</b>) LightGBM-2023, (<b>d</b>) SVR-2021, (<b>e</b>) SVR-2022, (<b>f</b>) SVR-2023, (<b>g</b>) KNN-2021, (<b>h</b>) KNN-2022, (<b>i</b>) KNN-2023, (<b>j</b>) RR-2021, (<b>k</b>) RR-2022, (<b>l</b>) RR-2023, (<b>m</b>) WAHEM-2021, (<b>n</b>) WAHEM-2022, (<b>o</b>) WAHEM-2023, (<b>p</b>) MOD13A3-2021, (<b>q</b>) MOD13A3-2022, (<b>r</b>) MOD13A3-2023, (<b>s</b>) FY3D-MERSI-2021, (<b>t</b>) FY3D-MERSI-2022, (<b>u</b>) FY3D-MERSI-2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of FVC changes derived from different ML model predictions and satellite product calculations across various regions during the growing seasons from 2021 to 2023. (<b>a</b>) SWC, (<b>b</b>) Sichuan, (<b>c</b>) Chongqing, (<b>d</b>) Guizhou, (<b>e</b>) Yunnan, and (<b>f</b>) Tibet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Feature importance scores in the LightGBM model.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 9876 KiB  
Article
Estimation of Leaf Area Index across Biomes and Growth Stages Combining Multiple Vegetation Indices
by Fangyi Lv, Kaimin Sun, Wenzhuo Li, Shunxia Miao and Xiuqing Hu
Sensors 2024, 24(18), 6106; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24186106 - 21 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1454
Abstract
The leaf area index (LAI) is a key indicator of vegetation canopy structure and growth status, crucial for global ecological environment research. The Moderate Resolution Spectral Imager-II (MERSI-II) aboard Fengyun-3D (FY-3D) covers the globe twice daily, providing a reliable data source for large-scale [...] Read more.
The leaf area index (LAI) is a key indicator of vegetation canopy structure and growth status, crucial for global ecological environment research. The Moderate Resolution Spectral Imager-II (MERSI-II) aboard Fengyun-3D (FY-3D) covers the globe twice daily, providing a reliable data source for large-scale and high-frequency LAI estimation. VI-based LAI estimation is effective, but species and growth status impacts on the sensitivity of the VI–LAI relationship are rarely considered, especially for MERSI-II. This study analyzed the VI–LAI relationship for eight biomes in China with contrasting leaf structures and canopy architectures. The LAI was estimated by adaptively combining multiple VIs and validated using MODIS, GLASS, and ground measurements. Results show that (1) species and growth stages significantly affect VI–LAI sensitivity. For example, the EVI is optimal for broadleaf crops in winter, while the RDVI is best for evergreen needleleaf forests in summer. (2) Combining vegetation indices can significantly optimize sensitivity. The accuracy of multi-VI-based LAI retrieval is notably higher than using a single VI for the entire year. (3) MERSI-II shows good spatial–temporal consistency with MODIS and GLASS and is more sensitive to vegetation growth fluctuation. Direct validation with ground-truth data also demonstrates that the uncertainty of retrievals is acceptable (R2 = 0.808, RMSE = 0.642). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Land cover map of the study area using MODIS MCD12Q1 product in 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart for MERSI-II LAI estimation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Time-series curves of VIs and LAI for grasses/cereal crops.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time-series curves of VIs and LAI for broadleaf crops.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Time-series curves of VIs and LAI for savannahs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Time-series curves of VIs and LAI for deciduous broadleaf forests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>VI–LAI density scatter plot of grasses/cereal crops: (<b>a</b>) DVI–LAI; (<b>b</b>) EVI–LAI; (<b>c</b>) MSR-LAI; (<b>d</b>) NDVI–LAI; (<b>e</b>) OSAVI–LAI; (<b>f</b>) RDVI–LAI; (<b>g</b>) RVI–LAI; (<b>h</b>) SAVI–LAI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>VI–LAI density scatter plot of grasses/cereal crops: (<b>a</b>) DVI–LAI; (<b>b</b>) EVI–LAI; (<b>c</b>) MSR-LAI; (<b>d</b>) NDVI–LAI; (<b>e</b>) OSAVI–LAI; (<b>f</b>) RDVI–LAI; (<b>g</b>) RVI–LAI; (<b>h</b>) SAVI–LAI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Optimal VIs for MERSI-II LAI estimation across different biomes and growth stages. Biomes 1–8 correspond to grasses/cereal crops, shrubs, broadleaf crops, savanna, EBF, DBF, ENF, and ENF, respectively. The seven colors represent seven different input parameters, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Estimation results of different methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of spatial distributions of LAI differences between MERSI-II, Aqua MODIS and GLASS in mainland China in 2020: (<b>a</b>) MERSI-II LAI minus MODIS LAI; (<b>b</b>) STD of the LAI differences between MERSI-II and MODIS; (<b>c</b>) MERSI-II LAI minus GLASS LAI; (<b>d</b>) STD of the LAI differences between MERSI-II and GLASS. No-data pixels in white color are observations contaminated by cloud, shadow, aerosol, etc. Gray pixels are non-vegetation areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Bar chart for the proportion of different categories of LAI differences under each biome: (<b>a</b>) MERSI-II LAI minus MODIS LAI; (<b>b</b>) MERSI-II LAI minus GLASS LAI. Biomes 1–8 are grasses/cereal crops, shrubs, broadleaf crops, savanna, EBF, DBF, ENF, and ENF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Bar chart for the proportion of different biomes under each category of LAI difference: (<b>a</b>) MERSI-II LAI minus MODIS LAI; (<b>b</b>) MERSI-II LAI minus GLASS LAI. Biomes 1–8 are grasses/cereal crops, shrubs, broadleaf crops, savanna, EBF, DBF, ENF and ENF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Time series of MERSI, GLASS and MODIS (2020). The red circle indicates large fluctuations in MODIS LAI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison between ground-truth data and FY-3D MERSI-II LAI. Biome 1 is grasses/cereal crops, Biome 2 is shrubs, Biome 4 is savanna, Biome 5 is evergreen broadleaf forests, and Biome 8 is deciduous needleleaf forests.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4008 KiB  
Article
Phenotypic and Genetic Analyses of Mastitis, Endometritis, and Ketosis on Milk Production and Reproduction Traits in Chinese Holstein Cattle
by Xiaoli Ren, Haibo Lu, Yachun Wang, Lei Yan, Changlei Liu, Chu Chu, Zhuo Yang, Xiangnan Bao, Mei Yu, Zhen Zhang and Shujun Zhang
Animals 2024, 14(16), 2372; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162372 - 15 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1067
Abstract
Mastitis (MAS), endometritis (MET), and ketosis (KET) are prevalent diseases in dairy cows that result in substantial economic losses for the dairy farming industry. This study gathered 26,014 records of the health and sickness of dairy cows and 99,102 data of reproduction from [...] Read more.
Mastitis (MAS), endometritis (MET), and ketosis (KET) are prevalent diseases in dairy cows that result in substantial economic losses for the dairy farming industry. This study gathered 26,014 records of the health and sickness of dairy cows and 99,102 data of reproduction from 13 Holstein dairy farms in Central China; the milk protein and milk fat content from 56,640 milk samples, as well as the pedigree data of 37,836 dairy cows were obtained. The logistic regression method was used to analyze the variations in the prevalence rates of MAS, MET, and KET among various parities; the mixed linear model was used to examine the effects of the three diseases on milk production, milk quality, and reproductive traits. DMU software (version 5.2) utilized the DMUAI module in conjunction with the single-trait and two-trait animal model, as well as best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), to estimate the genetic parameters for the three diseases, milk production, milk quality, and reproductive traits in dairy cows. The primary findings of the investigation comprised the following: (1) The prevalence rates of MAS, MET, and KET in dairy farms were 20.04%, 10.68%, and 7.33%, respectively. (2) MAS and MET had a substantial impact (p < 0.01) on milk production, resulting in significant decreases of 112 kg and 372 kg in 305-d Milk Yield (305-d MY), 4 kg and 12 kg in 305-d Protein Yield (305-d PY), and 6 kg and 16 kg in 305-d Fat Yield (305-d FY). As a result of their excessive 305-d MY, some cows were diagnosed with KET due to glucose metabolism disorder. The 305-d MY of cows with KET was significantly higher than that of healthy cows (205 kg, p < 0.01). (3) All three diseases resulted in an increase in the Interval from Calving to First Service (CTFS, 0.60–1.50 d), Interval from First Service to Conception (FSTC, 0.20–16.20 d), Calving Interval (CI, 4.00–7.00 d), and Number of Services (NUMS, 0.07–0.35). (4) The heritabilities of cows with MAS, MET, and KET were found to be low, with values of 0.09, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively. The genetic correlation between these traits ranged from 0.14 to 0.44. This study offers valuable insights on the prevention and control of the three diseases, as well as feeding management and genetic breeding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Advances in Cattle Breeding, Genetics and Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The prevalence rates and odds ratios (ORs) of mastitis in different parities, compared to the first parity. The MAS Rate represents the mastitis prevalence rate. “**” represents no and highly significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The prevalence rates and odds ratios (ORs) of endometritis in different parities, compared to the first parity. The MET Rate represents the endometritis prevalence rate. NS and “**”, respectively, represent no and highly significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p &gt;</span> 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The prevalence rates and odds ratios (ORs) of ketosis in different parities, compared to the first parity. The KET Rate represents the ketosis prevalence rate. “**” represents no and highly significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The effects of mastitis, endometritis, and ketosis on milk production in dairy cows. (<b>a</b>) 305-d MY represents 305-d Milk Yield, (<b>b</b>) 305-d PY represents 305-d Protein Yield, and (<b>c</b>) 305-d FY represents 305-d Fat Yield. MAS represents mastitis, MET represents endometritis, and KET represents ketosis. LSM represents the least squares means. NS and “**”, respectively, represent no and highly significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p &gt;</span> 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>The effects of mastitis, endometritis, and ketosis on milk production in dairy cows. (<b>a</b>) 305-d MY represents 305-d Milk Yield, (<b>b</b>) 305-d PY represents 305-d Protein Yield, and (<b>c</b>) 305-d FY represents 305-d Fat Yield. MAS represents mastitis, MET represents endometritis, and KET represents ketosis. LSM represents the least squares means. NS and “**”, respectively, represent no and highly significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p &gt;</span> 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The effects of mastitis, endometritis, and ketosis on milk composition in dairy cows. (<b>a</b>) ASCS represents the Average Somatic Cell Score (SCS) in lactation, (<b>b</b>) ADSCC represents the Average Differential Somatic Cell Count (DSCC) in lactation, (<b>c</b>) APROPER represents the Average Protein Percentage in lactation, and (<b>d</b>) AFATPER represents the Average Fat Percentage in Lactation. MAS represents mastitis, MET represents endometritis, and KET represents ketosis. LSM represents the least squares means. NS and “**”, respectively, represent no and highly significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p &gt;</span> 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>The effects of mastitis, endometritis, and ketosis on milk composition in dairy cows. (<b>a</b>) ASCS represents the Average Somatic Cell Score (SCS) in lactation, (<b>b</b>) ADSCC represents the Average Differential Somatic Cell Count (DSCC) in lactation, (<b>c</b>) APROPER represents the Average Protein Percentage in lactation, and (<b>d</b>) AFATPER represents the Average Fat Percentage in Lactation. MAS represents mastitis, MET represents endometritis, and KET represents ketosis. LSM represents the least squares means. NS and “**”, respectively, represent no and highly significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p &gt;</span> 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The effects of mastitis, endometritis, and ketosis on reproductive performance in dairy cows. (<b>a</b>) CTFS represents the Interval from Calving to First Service, (<b>b</b>) FSTC represents the Interval from First Service to Conception, (<b>c</b>) NUMS represents the Number of Services, and (<b>d</b>) CI represents Calving Interval. MAS represents mastitis, MET represents endometritis, and KET represents ketosis. LSM represents the least squares means. NS and “**”, respectively, represent no and highly significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p &gt;</span> 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The heritability and genetic correlation of mastitis, endometritis, ketosis, milk yield, milk composition, and reproduction traits in dairy cattle. MAS represents mastitis, MET represents endometritis, KET represents ketosis, 305-d MY represents 305-d Milk Yield, 305-d PY represents 305-d Protein Yield, 305-d FY represents 305-d Fat Yield, ASCS represents the Average Somatic Cell Score (SCS) in lactation, ADSCC represents the Average Differential Somatic Cell Count (DSCC) in lactation, APROPER represents the Average Protein Percentage in lactation, AFATPER represents the Average Fat Percentage in lactation, CTFS represents the Interval from Calving to First Service, FSTC represents the Interval from First Service to Conception, NUMS represents the Number of Services, and CI represents the Calving Interval. Corrg, in the lower triangles, represents genetic correlation. H, in the diagonal, represents heritability. NS, “*”, and “**”, respectively, represent no, significant, and highly significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p &gt;</span> 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The phenotypic correlation of mastitis, endometritis, ketosis, milk yield, milk composition, and reproduction traits in dairy cattle. Corrp represents phenotypic correlation. NS, “*”, and “**”, respectively, represent no, significant, and highly significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p &gt;</span> 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p &lt;</span> 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01). The trait meanings are the same as in <a href="#animals-14-02372-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 23818 KiB  
Article
Effects of Assimilating Ground-Based Microwave Radiometer and FY-3D MWTS-2/MWHS-2 Data in Precipitation Forecasting
by Bingli Wang, Wei Cheng, Yansong Bao, Shudong Wang, George P. Petropoulos, Shuiyong Fan, Jiajia Mao, Ziqi Jin and Zihui Yang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(14), 2682; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142682 - 22 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1005
Abstract
This study investigates the impacts of the joint assimilation of ground-based microwave radiometer (MWR) and FY-3D microwave sounder (MWTS-2/MWHS-2) observations on the analyses and forecasts for precipitation forecast. Based on the weather research and forecasting data assimilation (WRFDA) system, four experiments are conducted [...] Read more.
This study investigates the impacts of the joint assimilation of ground-based microwave radiometer (MWR) and FY-3D microwave sounder (MWTS-2/MWHS-2) observations on the analyses and forecasts for precipitation forecast. Based on the weather research and forecasting data assimilation (WRFDA) system, four experiments are conducted in this study, concerning a heavy precipitation event in Beijing on 2 July 2021, and 10-day batch experiments were also conducted. The key study findings include the following: (1) Both ground-based microwave radiometer and MWTS-2/MWHS-2 data contribute to improvements in the initial fields of the model, leading to appropriate adjustments in the thermal structure of the model. (2) The forecast fields of the experiments assimilating ground-based microwave radiometer and MWTS-2/MWHS-2 data show temperature and humidity performances closer to the true fields compared with the control experiment. (3) Separate assimilation of two types of microwave radiometer data can improve precipitation forecasts, while joint assimilation provides the most accurate forecasts among all the experiments. In the single-case, compared with the control experiment, the individual and combined assimilation of MWR and MWTS-2/MWHS-2 improves the six-hour cumulative precipitation threat score (TS) at the 25 mm level by 57.1%, 28.9%, and 38.2%, respectively. The combined assimilation also improves the scores at the 50 mm level by 54.4%, whereas individual assimilations show a decrease in performance. In the batch experiments, the MWR_FY experiment’s TS of 24 h precipitation forecast improves 28.5% at 10 mm and 330% at 25 mm based on the CTRL. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of ground microwave radiometer stations, located in Beijing, China: Haidian (Station ID 54399), Yanqing (Station ID 54406), Huairou (Station ID 54419), Pinggu (Station ID 54424), Nanjiao (Station ID 54511), and Xiayunling (Station ID 54597).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Probability distribution function of deviations in ground-based microwave radiometer temperature data before and after preprocessing for stations (<b>a</b>) 54511, (<b>b</b>) 54597, (<b>c</b>) 54419, (<b>d</b>) 54424, (<b>e</b>) 54511, and (<b>f</b>) 54597. The red “u” and “o” represent the error mean and error standard deviation of all samples before QC and BC. The blue “u” and “o” represent the error mean and error standard deviation of all samples after QC and BC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Probability distribution function of observation-minus-background (OMB) for (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>) without bias correction, (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>) OMB with bias correction, and (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) OMA with bias correction of (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) MWTS-2 ch7, (<b>d</b>–<b>e</b>) MWHS-2 ch11, respectively. “ME” represents the mean, “STD” represents the standard deviation, and “RMSE” represents the root-mean-square error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cloud distribution after cloud matching (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and true cloud distribution from the moderate resolution spectral imager (MERSI) (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) at 1800 UTC on 1 July (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and 0600 UTC on 2 July (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Brightness temperature distribution in MWTS-2 channel 11 under clear-sky conditions (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and retrieval temperature distribution at 500 hPa latitude (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) at 1800 UTC on 1 July (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and 0600 UTC on 2 July (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution of cumulative precipitation in Beijing on 2 July 2021 (<b>a</b>) from 1800 UTC to 0000 UTC; (<b>b</b>) from 1800 UTC to 2100 UTC; (<b>c</b>) from 2100 UTC to 0000 UTC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simulated area in ARW-WRF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Assimilation flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>MWR, retrieval, and clear-sky observations at (<b>a</b>) 850 hPa and (<b>b</b>) 500 hPa in Beijing at 0600 UTC on 2 July 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Temperature and humidity profiles for the MWR, along with its adjacent MWTS-2/WMHS-2 cloud area retrievals from sites 54399, 54419, and 54597 at 0600 UTC on 2 July 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Vertical cross-sections of the specific humidity increments after the first data assimilation along 40°N from (<b>a</b>) CTRL, (<b>b</b>) MWR, (<b>c</b>) FY, and (<b>d</b>) MWR_FY.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Specific humidity increments after the first data assimilation at 500 hPa and 850 hPa altitude from (<b>a</b>) CTRL, (<b>b</b>) MWR, (<b>c</b>) FY, and (<b>d</b>) MWR_FY, with the black mark indicating the location of the ground-based microwave radiometer station.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Temperature and wind superposition at 500 hPa forecast field from (<b>a</b>) GFS, (<b>b</b>) CTRL, (<b>c</b>) MWR, (<b>d</b>) FY, and (<b>e</b>) MWR_FY at 0000 UTC on 3 July 2021. The shadow represents the temperature distribution and the dashed line represents the temperature isotherm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Vertical cross-sections of relative humidity (shadow), temperature (red lines), and wind field (vectors) along 40°N from (<b>a</b>) GFS, (<b>b</b>) CTRL, (<b>c</b>) MWR, (<b>d</b>) FY, and (<b>e</b>) MWR_FY at 0000 UTC on 3 July 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Distribution of precipitation forecasts for the 6 h (from 1800 UTC on 2 July to 0000 UTC on 3 July), the first 3 h (from 1800 UTC to 2100 UTC on 2 July), and the last 3 h (from 2100 UTC on 2 July to 0000 UTC on 3 July) from OBS (actual observation), the CTRL, the MWR, the FY, and the MWR_FY experiments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Threat score (TS) for (<b>a</b>) 6 h rainfall forecast, (<b>b</b>) the first 3 h rainfall forecast, and (<b>c</b>) the last 3 h rainfall forecast from all four experiments at different rainfall thresholds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>RMSE/bias profiles for 12 h and 24 h temperature (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and relative humidity (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) forecast fields.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Threat score (TS) for (<b>a</b>) 24 h rainfall forecast, (<b>b</b>) the first 12 h rainfall forecast, and (<b>c</b>) the last 12 h rainfall forecast from all four experiments of 10-days at different rainfall thresholds.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop