Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Degidi’s chamber

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 5366 KiB  
Case Report
Management of Vestibular Bone Fenestration with Periosteal Inhibition (PI) Technique During Alveolar Socket Preservation: A Case Report
by Andrea Grassi, Maria Eleonora Bizzoca, Lucia De Biasi, Rossella Padula, Ciro Annicchiarico, Gabriele Cervino, Lorenzo Lo Muzio and Filiberto Mastrangelo
Medicina 2024, 60(12), 1912; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60121912 - 21 Nov 2024
Viewed by 279
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The purpose of this case report is to examine the management of vestibular bone fenestration during alveolar socket preservation using the Periosteal Inhibition (PI) approach. Here, for the first time, the PI technique, which has been shown to be successful [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The purpose of this case report is to examine the management of vestibular bone fenestration during alveolar socket preservation using the Periosteal Inhibition (PI) approach. Here, for the first time, the PI technique, which has been shown to be successful in maintaining intact cortical bone, is examined in the context of a bone defect. Materials and Methods: After an atraumatic extraction of a damaged tooth, a vestibular bone fenestration was discovered in the 62-year-old male patient. To shield the defect, a non-resorbable PTFE membrane (OSSEO GUARD by Zimmer Biomet) was positioned between the mucosa and the fenestration site. A resorbable porcine gelatin sponge (SPONGOSTANTM) was used to achieve hemostasis, and a 5/0 PGCL absorbable suture was used to close the wound. A CBCT scan was performed, and a dental implant was inserted after 4 months. Results: After 4 months, the case demonstrated positive results, with full cortical remodeling and preservation of the original bone proportions. The fenestration completely healed, proving that the PI approach works even in the presence of bone flaws in cortical bone that is still intact. Conclusions: This is the first case report that shows that vestibular bone fenestration can be successfully treated with the PI approach. It has now been demonstrated that the procedure, which hitherto needed an undamaged cortical bone to work, can help bone abnormalities to repair completely. These results imply that the PI technique is a flexible and useful approach that provides predictable results in dental surgery for treating different types of alveolar bone abnormalities. Its use might be expanded with more study to include bone dehiscence treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Soft and Hard Tissue Management Around Dental Implants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>CBCT images of the patient before the surgery: (<b>a</b>) frontal section, (<b>b</b>) transversal section, and (<b>c</b>) sagittal section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Preoperative sites, (<b>b</b>) alveolar socket, (<b>c</b>) fenestration in the vestibular bone, (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) ptfe OSSEOGUARD membrane from Zimmer Biomet in place, and (<b>f</b>) SPONGOSTAN and sling suture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Tissue healing after 1 month: (<b>a</b>) occlusal view and (<b>b</b>) buccal view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>CBCT images at 4 months after the surgery: (<b>a</b>) frontal section, (<b>b</b>) transversal section, and (<b>c</b>) sagittal section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Second surgical step: (<b>a</b>) incision for the envelope flap, (<b>b</b>) individualizing the membrane, (<b>c</b>) removing the membrane, (<b>d</b>) site preparation for the implant, (<b>e</b>) implant inserted, and (<b>f</b>) healing screw in place.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Third surgical step: (<b>a</b>) Curvomax abutment occlusal view and (<b>b</b>) Curvomax abutment sagittal view. Perfect soft-tissue healing can be observed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Fourth surgical step: (<b>a</b>) prosthetic rehabilitation occlusal view and (<b>b</b>) prosthetic rehabilitation—sagittal view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Final endoral RX.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) CBCT images before the surgery (sagittal section) and (<b>b</b>) CBCT images after 4 months (sagittal section).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Tissue healing after 4 months (occlusal view).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) CBCT pictures after a year (sagittal section) and (<b>b</b>) CBCT pictures after a year (coronal section).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop