Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,843)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GPR

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 6020 KiB  
Article
Numerical Simulation Study on the Impact of Blind Zones in Ground Penetrating Radar
by Wentian Wang, Wei Du, Siyuan Cheng and Jia Zhuo
Sensors 2025, 25(4), 1252; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25041252 - 18 Feb 2025
Abstract
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is an effective geophysical method for rapid and non-destructive detection. Directional borehole radar is the application of GPR in a borehole, which can determine the depth, orientation, and distance of the target from the borehole. The borehole radar azimuth recognition [...] Read more.
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is an effective geophysical method for rapid and non-destructive detection. Directional borehole radar is the application of GPR in a borehole, which can determine the depth, orientation, and distance of the target from the borehole. The borehole radar azimuth recognition algorithm is based on the assumption of far-field plane waves. Therefore, in the near-field area where the target is closer to the borehole, the electromagnetic waves reflected by the target cannot be regarded as plane waves but will have a certain curvature. The plane wave assumption is not valid in this area, so the azimuth recognition algorithm will have significant errors, forming blind zones for directional borehole radar detection. This article uses the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) algorithm to numerically simulate how blind zones affect directional borehole radar systems, identify the impact patterns, and minimize them. After calculation and numerical simulation verification, it has been found that when the center frequency of the antenna is 1 GHz, within 2 m of the target from the borehole, there is a significant error in azimuth recognition, which can be defined as the near-field region. Similarly, through numerical simulation verification, the optimal antenna center frequency is between 600 MHz and 1100 MHz. Oil-based mud is superior to water-based mud. The optimal antenna center frequency decreases as the target distance increases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Directional borehole sonde with one transmitting and four receiving antennas forming a uniform circular array (UCA), located in a water-filled borehole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of a uniform linear array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of ray distribution in the near−field blind zone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The relationship between distance and azimuth identification error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The relationship between the target’s location and the error in location identification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Model diagram of the impact of different antenna center frequencies on the received signal of directional borehole radar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The impact of the antenna center frequency, ranging from 100 MHz to 800 MHz, on the received signal of a directional borehole radar. (<b>a</b>) Received signal at an antenna center frequency of 100 MHz; (<b>b</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 100 MHz; (<b>c</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 200 MHz; (<b>d</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 200 MHz; (<b>e</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 300 MHz; (<b>f</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 300 MHz; (<b>g</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 400 MHz; (<b>h</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 400 MHz; (<b>i</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 500 MHz; (<b>j</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 500 MHz; (<b>k</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 600 MHz; (<b>l</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 600 MHz; (<b>m</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 700 MHz; (<b>n</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 700 MHz; (<b>o</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 800 MHz; (<b>p</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 800 MHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The impact of the antenna center frequency, ranging from 900 MHz to 1600 MHz, on the received signal of a directional borehole radar. (<b>a</b>) Received signal at an antenna center frequency of 900 MHz; (<b>b</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 900 MHz; (<b>c</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1000 MHz; (<b>d</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1000 MHz; (<b>e</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1100 MHz; (<b>f</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1100 MHz; (<b>g</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1200 MHz; (<b>h</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1200 MHz; (<b>i</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1300 MHz; (<b>j</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1300 MHz; (<b>k</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1400 MHz; (<b>l</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1400 MHz; (<b>m</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1500 MHz; (<b>n</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1500 MHz; (<b>o</b>) received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1600 MHz; (<b>p</b>) local amplification of the received signal at an antenna center frequency of 1600 MHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Signal reception diagram of east-facing receiving antennas at various frequencies. (<b>a</b>) Global map; (<b>b</b>) local enlarged view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>When the target is located in the blind zone, the influence of the relative permittivity of the fluid in the borehole, ranging from 3 to 7, on the received signal of the directional borehole radar. (<b>a</b>) The received signal has a relative permittivity of 3 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>b</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 3 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>c</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 3.5 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>d</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 3.5 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>e</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 4 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>f</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 4 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>g</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 4.5 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>h</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 4.5 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>i</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 5 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>j</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 5 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>k</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 5.5 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>l</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 5.5 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>m</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 6 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>n</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 6 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>o</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 7 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>p</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 7 for the fluid in the borehole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>When the target is located in the blind zones, the influence of the relative permittivity of the fluid in the borehole, ranging from 8 to 40, on the received signal of the directional borehole radar. (<b>a</b>) The received signal has a relative permittivity of 8 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>b</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 8 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>c</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 9 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>d</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 9 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>e</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 10 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>f</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 10 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>g</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 15 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>h</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 15 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>i</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 20 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>j</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 20 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>k</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 25 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>l</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 25 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>m</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 30 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>n</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 30 for the fluid in the borehole; (<b>o</b>) the received signal has a relative permittivity of 40 for the fluid inside the borehole; (<b>p</b>) local amplification diagram of the received signal with a relative permittivity of 40 for the fluid in the borehole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Numerical simulation results of the cause of resonance when the relative permittivity of the fluid in the borehole is 80. There are (<b>a</b>) “borehole, probe tube, and target” conditions; (<b>b</b>) local magnification of “borehole, probe tube, and target” conditions; (<b>c</b>) “no borehole, no probe tube, but with target” conditions; (<b>d</b>) local magnification of “no borehole, no probe tube, but with target” conditions; (<b>e</b>) “with a wellbore and a probe tube, but no target” conditions; (<b>f</b>) local magnification of “with a wellbore and a probe tube, but no target” conditions; (<b>g</b>) “with a borehole, no probe tube, and no target” conditions; (<b>h</b>) local magnification of “with a borehole, no probe tube, and no target” conditions; (<b>i</b>) “with a borehole but no probe tube, there is a target” conditions; (<b>j</b>) local magnification of “with a borehole but no probe tube, there is a target” conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Model diagram of the influence of target distance on the received signal of directional borehole radar.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>When the target distances are 2.25 m and 1.75 m, the directional borehole radar receives signals. (<b>a</b>) When the target distance is 2.25 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 300 MHz. (<b>b</b>) When the target distance is 2.25 m, the antenna center frequency is 300 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>c</b>) When the target distance is 2.25 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 600 MHz. (<b>d</b>) When the target distance is 2.25 m, the antenna center frequency is 600 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>e</b>) When the target distance is 2.25 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 900 MHz. (<b>f</b>) When the target distance is 2.25 m, the antenna center frequency is 900 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>g</b>) When the target distance is 1.75 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 300 MHz. (<b>h</b>) When the target distance is 1.75 m, the antenna center frequency is 300 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>i</b>) When the target distance is 1.75 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 600 MHz. (<b>j</b>) When the target distance is 1.75 m, the antenna center frequency is 600 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>k</b>) When the target distance is 1.75 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 900 MHz. (<b>l</b>) When the target distance is 1.75 m, the antenna center frequency is 900 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>When the target distances are 1.25 m and 0.75 m, the directional borehole radar receives signals. (<b>a</b>) When the target distance is 1.25 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 300 MHz. (<b>b</b>) When the target distance is 1.25 m, the antenna center frequency is 300 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>c</b>) When the target distance is 1.25 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 600 MHz. (<b>d</b>) When the target distance is 1.25 m, the antenna center frequency is 600 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>e</b>) When the target distance is 1.25 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 900 MHz. (<b>f</b>) When the target distance is 1.25 m, the antenna center frequency is 900 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>g</b>) When the target distance is 0.75 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 300 MHz. (<b>h</b>) When the target distance is 0.75 m, the antenna center frequency is 300 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>i</b>) When the target distance is 0.75 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 600 MHz. (<b>j</b>) When the target distance is 0.75 m, the antenna center frequency is 600 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>k</b>) When the target distance is 0.75 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 900 MHz. (<b>l</b>) When the target distance is 0.75 m, the antenna center frequency is 900 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>When the target distances are 0.25 m, the directional borehole radar receives signals. (<b>a</b>) When the target distance is 0.25 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 300 MHz. (<b>b</b>) When the target distance is 0.25 m, the antenna center frequency is 300 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>c</b>) When the target distance is 0.25 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 600 MHz. (<b>d</b>) When the target distance is 0.25 m, the antenna center frequency is 600 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified. (<b>e</b>) When the target distance is 0.25 m, the antenna receives a signal with a center frequency of 900 MHz. (<b>f</b>) When the target distance is 0.25 m, the antenna center frequency is 900 MHz, and the received signal is locally amplified.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 4172 KiB  
Article
Data-Driven Identification of Early Cancer-Associated Genes via Penalized Trans-Dimensional Hidden Markov Models
by Saeedeh Hajebi Khaniki and Farhad Shokoohi
Biomolecules 2025, 15(2), 294; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15020294 - 16 Feb 2025
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant worldwide health problem due to its high prevalence, mortality rates, and frequent diagnosis at advanced stages. While diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have evolved, the underlying mechanisms driving CRC initiation and progression are not yet fully understood. Early [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant worldwide health problem due to its high prevalence, mortality rates, and frequent diagnosis at advanced stages. While diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have evolved, the underlying mechanisms driving CRC initiation and progression are not yet fully understood. Early detection is critical for improving patient survival, as initial cancer stages often exhibit epigenetic changes—such as DNA methylation—that regulate gene expression and tumor progression. Identifying DNA methylation patterns and key survival-related genes in CRC could thus enhance diagnostic accuracy and extend patient lifespans. In this study, we apply two of our recently developed methods for identifying differential methylation and analyzing survival using a sparse, finite mixture of accelerated failure time regression models, focusing on key genes and pathways in CRC datasets. Our approach outperforms two other leading methods, yielding robust findings and identifying novel differentially methylated cytosines. We found that CRC patient survival time follows a two-component mixture regression model, where genes CDH11, EPB41L3, and DOCK2 are active in the more aggressive form of CRC, whereas TMEM215, PPP1R14A, GPR158, and NAPSB are active in the less aggressive form. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Fitted density of overall survival time in CRC patients (empty circles are observed survival times of CRC patients).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A flowchart of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Proportion of missing values in (<b>a</b>) CRC and (<b>b</b>) ACF datasets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Volcano plot of predicted methylation of hypo-methylated DMCs (blue) and hyper-methylated DMCs (red) using <tt>DMCTHM</tt>. (<b>a</b>) CRC vs. adjacent normal colon samples. (<b>b</b>) ACF vs. normal crypt samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Genomic locations of identified hyper- (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and hypo-methylated (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) DMCs in CRC (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) and ACF (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) datasets using <tt>DMCTHM</tt> (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>) and <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Differentially methylated gene distribution via <tt>DMCTHM</tt> and <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Venn diagram of commonly identified DMGs in CRC and ACF datasets using <tt>DMCTHM</tt>, <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test, and GEO datasets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Gene set enrichment analysis of overlapped DMGs in CRC/ACF datasets identified by <tt>DMCTHM</tt> and <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test: (<b>a</b>) Gene Ontology; (<b>b</b>) KEGG Pathway.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Gene set enrichment analysis of overlapped DMGs in CRC/ACF datasets identified by <tt>DMCTHM</tt> and <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test: (<b>a</b>) Gene Ontology; (<b>b</b>) KEGG Pathway.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Posterior probabilities of patients belonging to Component 1, with <span class="html-italic">Alive</span> and <span class="html-italic">Dead</span> patients separated.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 6918 KiB  
Review
G-Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Signaling and Pharmacology in Metabolism: Physiology, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Potential
by Yun Yeong Cho, Soyeon Kim, Pankyung Kim, Min Jeong Jo, Song-E Park, Yiju Choi, Su Myung Jung and Hye Jin Kang
Biomolecules 2025, 15(2), 291; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15020291 - 15 Feb 2025
Abstract
G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest family of integral membrane proteins, enable cells to sense and appropriately respond to the environment through mediating extracellular signaling to intercellular messenger molecules. GPCRs’ pairing with a diverse array of G protein subunits and related downstream secondary [...] Read more.
G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest family of integral membrane proteins, enable cells to sense and appropriately respond to the environment through mediating extracellular signaling to intercellular messenger molecules. GPCRs’ pairing with a diverse array of G protein subunits and related downstream secondary messengers, combined with their ligand versatility-from conventional peptide hormone to numerous bioactive metabolites, allow GPCRs to comprehensively regulate metabolism and physiology. Consequently, GPCRs have garnered significant attention for their therapeutic potential in metabolic diseases. This review focuses on six GPCRs, GPR40, GPR120, GLP-1R, and ß-adrenergic receptors (ADRB1, ADRB2, and ADRB3), with GLP-1R recognized as a prominent regulator of system-level metabolism, while the roles of GPR40, GPR120 and ß-adrenergic receptors in central carbon metabolism and energy homeostasis are increasingly appreciated. Here, we discuss their physiological functions in metabolism, the current pharmacological landscape, and the intricacies of their signaling pathways via G protein and ß-arrestin activation. Additionally, we discuss the limitations of existing GPCR-targeted strategies for treating metabolic diseases and offer insights into future perspectives for advancing GPCR pharmacology. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of key GPCRs involved in the regulation of metabolic functions and diseases. ADRB1 in cardiac muscle regulates glucose metabolism. ADRB2, ADRB3, and GPR120 regulate brown adipose function. GPR40 and GLP-1R in the pancreas regulate insulin homeostasis; GPR120 in the intestine activates GIP secretion. Metabolic diseases can be treated by pharmacologically targeting these GPCRs. GIP, gastric inhibitory polypeptide. The figure was created using BioRender (<a href="http://biorender.com/" target="_blank">http://biorender.com/</a>accessed on 21 January 2025).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>mRNA expression of GPCRs in metabolic organs; (<b>A</b>–<b>F</b>) Normalized TPM values of Gpr40, Gpr120, Glp1r, Adrb1, Adrb2, and Adrb3 expressed in organs that can contribute significantly to maintaining metabolic homeostasis. Data was processed from RNA expression data of Human Protein Atlas (v24.proteinatlas.org, accessed on 13 January 2025) [<a href="#B61-biomolecules-15-00291" class="html-bibr">61</a>].</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 13790 KiB  
Article
A Non-Destructive Search for Holocaust-Era Mass Graves Using Ground Penetrating Radar in the Vidzgiris Forest, Alytus, Lithuania
by Philip Reeder and Harry Jol
NDT 2025, 3(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/ndt3010005 - 14 Feb 2025
Abstract
The non-destructive geophysical testing method ground penetrating radar (GPR), along with satellite image and air photo assessment, a review of the existing literature sources, and Holocaust survivor testimony, was used to document the location of potential mass graves in Alytus, Lithuania. In World [...] Read more.
The non-destructive geophysical testing method ground penetrating radar (GPR), along with satellite image and air photo assessment, a review of the existing literature sources, and Holocaust survivor testimony, was used to document the location of potential mass graves in Alytus, Lithuania. In World War II, six million Jews were murdered, as were as many as five million other victims of Nazi Germany’s orchestrated persecution. In the summer of 1941, 8030 Jews (4.70 percent of Lithuania’s Jewish population) lived in Alytus County, where the town of Alytus is located. It is estimated that over 8000 Jews were murdered in Alytus County, including nearly the entire Jewish population of the town of Alytus. The murder of Jews from Alytus County accounts for approximately 4.2% of the total number of Lithuanian Jews killed in the Holocaust. Survivor testimony indicates that several thousand Jews from both the town and county were murdered and buried in the Vidzgiris Forest about 1000 m from the town center. In 2022, field reconnaissance at locations in the forest, which appeared to be disturbed in a 1944 German Luftwaffe air photograph, indicated that these disturbances were associated with natural geomorphic processes and not the Holocaust. Analysis of GPR data that was collected using a pulseEKKO Pro 500-megahertz groundpenetrating radar (GPR) system in 2022 in the vicinity of monuments erected in the forest to memorialize mass graves indicates that no mass graves were directly associated with these monuments. The 1944 air photograph contained two roads that traversed through and abruptly ended in the forest, which was the impetus for detailed field reconnaissance in that area. A segment of a 150 m long linear surface feature found in the forest was assessed using GPR, and based on the profile that was generated, it was determined that this feature is possibly a segment of a much more extensive mass grave. Testimony of a Holocaust survivor stated that as many as three burial trenches exist in this portion of the forest. Additional research using non-destructive GPR technology, air photograph and satellite image assessment, and the existing literature and testimony-based data are required for the Vidzgiris Forest to better define these and other potential mass graves and other Holocaust-related features. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The location of Alytus, Lithuania.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Part of the research team collecting GPR data in the summer of 2022 near one of the nine pyramid-shaped monuments in the Vidzgiris Forest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The location of the seven GPR grids that were established as part of this project, placed on a 2022 Google Earth satellite image. The red-colored grids contain data anomalies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>GPR grid 4 location looking longitudinally down a potential trench (<b>left</b>) and actively collecting GPR and topographic data along this grid (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Base map image for Storyteller for Lithuania with the Alytus area indicated within the blue rectangle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A Storyteller image zoomed in on Alytus showing the 1944 air photographs where coverage exists. German air photo coverage ends just east of the central portion of the city of Alytus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of locations on the 2018 satellite image (<b>A</b>) and the 1944 air photo (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>GPR grid 1 (<b>A</b>) data slice (depth from 0.75 to 0.80 m) with anomalous features in the red box and (<b>B</b>) cross-sectional profile data with anomalous features in the blue rectangle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>GPR grid 5 (<b>A</b>) data slice (depth from 0.45 to 0.50 m) with anomalous features in the red rectangle and (<b>B</b>) cross-sectional profile data with anomalous features in the blue rectangle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>GPR grid 5 (<b>A</b>) data slice (depth from 1.55 to 1.60 m) with anomalous features in the red box and (<b>B</b>) cross-sectional profile data with anomalous features in the blue rectangle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>GPR grid 4 (<b>A</b>) data slice (depth from 0.45 to 0.50 m) with anomalous features in the yellow rectangle and (<b>B</b>) cross-sectional profile data with anomalous features in the yellow box.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>GPR grid 4 (<b>A</b>) data slice (depth from 1.75 to 1.80 m) with anomalous features in the white box and (<b>B</b>) cross-sectional profile data with anomalous features in the white rectangle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The area of Vidzgiris Forest that potentially contains trenches that hold the remains of Jews murdered and buried in the forest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The remains of two cement objects in the Vidzgiris Forest that may be the remains of a gate near the feature that is interpreted to be a possible burial trench.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>ESRI Storyteller image with the 1944 air photo overlain on a 2018 satellite image, with the roads that extend east from the forest road, and the area that contains the three potential burial trenches and the GPR grid over the main trench, highlighted.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 9886 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Daily Runoff Forecasting with Global Rainfall Products in Algeria
by Rayane Bounab, Hamouda Boutaghane, Tayeb Boulmaiz and Yves Tramblay
Atmosphere 2025, 16(2), 213; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16020213 - 13 Feb 2025
Abstract
Rainfall–runoff models are crucial tools for managing water resources. The absence of reliable rainfall data in many regions of the world is a major limitation for these models, notably in many African countries, although some recent global rainfall products can effectively monitor rainfall [...] Read more.
Rainfall–runoff models are crucial tools for managing water resources. The absence of reliable rainfall data in many regions of the world is a major limitation for these models, notably in many African countries, although some recent global rainfall products can effectively monitor rainfall from space. In Algeria, to identify a relevant modeling approach using this new source of rainfall information, the present research aims to (i) compare a conceptual model (GR4J) and seven machine learning algorithms (FFNN, ELM, LSTM, LSTM2, GRU, SVM, and GPR) and (ii) compare different types of precipitation inputs, including four satellite products (CHIRPS, SM2RAIN, GPM, and PERSIANN), one reanalysis product (ERA5), and observed precipitation, to assess which combination of models and precipitation data provides the optimal performance for river discharge simulation. The results show that the ELM, FFNN, and LSTM algorithms give the best performance (NSE > 0.6) for river runoff simulation and provide reliable alternatives compared to a conceptual hydrological model. The SM2RAIN-ASCAT and ERA5 rainfall products are as efficient as observed precipitation in this data-scarce context. Consequently, this work is the first step towards the implementation of these tools for the operational monitoring of surface water resources in Algeria. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Meteorology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The method used for rainfall–runoff simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Impact of time lag between rainfall and runoff on hydrological forecast accuracy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>KGE coefficient between simulated flow and observed flow of the different rainfall products for the different models. (<b>A</b>) is during calibration and (<b>B</b>) is during validation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Nash scores for each rainfall input in combination with the different hydrological models in calibration (<b>A</b>) and validation (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Time series of observed and forecast runoff in the Aissi basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Time series of observed and forecast runoff in the Boukdir basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Time series of observed and forecast runoff in the Aissi Isser.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Time series of observed and forecast runoff in the Malah basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Time series of observed and forecast runoff in the Zddine basin.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Taylor diagrams for the different rainfall inputs.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 3678 KiB  
Article
The Simultaneous Deletion of pH-Sensing Receptors GPR4 and OGR1 (GPR68) Ameliorates Colitis with Additive Effects on Multiple Parameters of Inflammation
by Federica Foti, Cordelia Schuler, Pedro A. Ruiz, Leonie Perren, Ermanno Malagola, Cheryl de Vallière, Klaus Seuwen, Martin Hausmann and Gerhard Rogler
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(4), 1552; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041552 - 12 Feb 2025
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPRs), including pro-inflammatory GPR4 and ovarian cancer GPR1 (OGR1/GPR68), are involved in the pH sensing of the extracellular space and have been implicated in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Previous data show that a loss of GPR4 or OGR1 independently is [...] Read more.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPRs), including pro-inflammatory GPR4 and ovarian cancer GPR1 (OGR1/GPR68), are involved in the pH sensing of the extracellular space and have been implicated in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Previous data show that a loss of GPR4 or OGR1 independently is associated with reduced intestinal inflammation in mouse models of experimental colitis. In the present manuscript, we investigated the impact of the simultaneous loss of GPR4 and OGR1 in animal models of IBD. To study the effects of combined loss of Gpr4 Ogr1 in IBD we used the well-established acute dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) and spontaneous Il10−/− murine colitis models. Disease severity was assessed using multiple clinical scores (e.g., body weight loss, disease activity score, murine endoscopic index of colitis severity (MEICS) and histological analyses). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), Western blot, and flow cytometry were used to investigate changes in pro-inflammatory cytokines expression and immune cells infiltration. We found that a combined loss of GPR4 and OGR1 significantly reduces colon inflammation in IBD relative to single deficiencies as evidenced by reduced body weight loss, disease score, CD4/CD8 ratio, and Il1β, Il6, and Tnf in the colon. Similarly, in the II10 deficiency model, the inflammation was significantly ameliorated upon the simultaneous deletion of GPR4 and OGR1, evidenced by a reduction in the MEICS score, colon length, Tnf and Il1β measurements, and a decrease in the number of macrophages in the colon, as compared to single deletions. Importantly, hydroxyproline levels were decreased close to baseline in Il10−/− × Gpr4−/− × Ogr1−/− mice. Our findings demonstrate that the simultaneous loss of GRP4 and OGR1 functions exerts an additive effect on multiple parameters associated with colonic inflammation. These results further reinforce the hypothesis that chronic inflammatory acidosis is a driver of fibrosis and is dependent on GPR4 and OGR1 signaling. The inhibition of both GPR4 and OGR1 by pH-sensing receptor modulators may constitute as a potential therapeutic option for IBD, as both pH-sensing receptors appear to sustain inflammation by acting on complementary pro-inflammatory pathways. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The absence of both GPR4 and OGR1 additively reduces inflammation in DSS-induced colitis. (<b>A</b>) Body weight, ±SEM. (<b>B</b>) Clinical disease activity score, ±SEM. (<b>C</b>) MEICS, ±SD, and exemplary pictures of colonoscopy from each group. (<b>D</b>) Spleen weight, ±SD. (<b>E</b>) Colon length, ±SD, and exemplary pictures of colons from each group. Non-parametric distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons test, Kruskal–Wallis test, two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values and <span class="html-italic">n</span> as indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>The absence of both GPR4 and OGR1 additively reduces inflammation in DSS-induced colitis. (<b>A</b>) Body weight, ±SEM. (<b>B</b>) Clinical disease activity score, ±SEM. (<b>C</b>) MEICS, ±SD, and exemplary pictures of colonoscopy from each group. (<b>D</b>) Spleen weight, ±SD. (<b>E</b>) Colon length, ±SD, and exemplary pictures of colons from each group. Non-parametric distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons test, Kruskal–Wallis test, two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values and <span class="html-italic">n</span> as indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Decreased histological score in <span class="html-italic">Gpr4</span><sup>−/−</sup> × <span class="html-italic">Ogr1</span><sup>−/−</sup> compared with WT mice upon acute DSS-induced colitis. (<b>A</b>) Exemplary microscopic pictures of HE-stained colons. (<b>B</b>) Histological score, non-parametric distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons test, Kruskal–Wallis test, two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli. ±SD, <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values, and <span class="html-italic">n</span> as indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Decreased F4/80<sup>+</sup> and CD4/CD8 in <span class="html-italic">Gpr4</span><sup>−/−</sup> × <span class="html-italic">Ogr1</span><sup>−/−</sup> compared with WT mice upon acute DSS-induced colitis. Immunoassay, (<b>A</b>) MCP-1, and (<b>B</b>) CCL3 in whole colon tissue, ±SEM each. (<b>C</b>) IHC, F4/80, ±SD. Flow cytometry for (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>) CD3, ±SD, and (F) CD4/CD8, ±SD. (D) Unpaired <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test. (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) Non-parametric distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) Normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons test, Kruskal–Wallis test, two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values and <span class="html-italic">n</span> as indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Decreased F4/80<sup>+</sup> and CD4/CD8 in <span class="html-italic">Gpr4</span><sup>−/−</sup> × <span class="html-italic">Ogr1</span><sup>−/−</sup> compared with WT mice upon acute DSS-induced colitis. Immunoassay, (<b>A</b>) MCP-1, and (<b>B</b>) CCL3 in whole colon tissue, ±SEM each. (<b>C</b>) IHC, F4/80, ±SD. Flow cytometry for (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>) CD3, ±SD, and (F) CD4/CD8, ±SD. (D) Unpaired <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test. (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) Non-parametric distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) Normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons test, Kruskal–Wallis test, two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values and <span class="html-italic">n</span> as indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>GPR4 and OGR1 deficiency additively reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines in acute DSS-induced colitis. (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">Il1β.</span> qPCR, ±SD; immunoassay, ±SEM; and WB, ±SD, in whole colon tissue each. (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">Il6</span>. qPCR, ±SD and immunoassay, ±SEM, in whole colon tissue and serum as indicated. (<b>C</b>) KC, (<b>D</b>) G-CSF, (<b>E</b>) CCL4, and (<b>F</b>) IL1α in serum or whole colon tissue as indicated, ±SEM. (<b>G</b>) qPCR, <span class="html-italic">Tnf</span>, ±SD. (<b>A</b>–<b>G</b>) One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons test, Kruskal–Wallis test, two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values and <span class="html-italic">n</span> as indicated. Non-parametric distribution, except IL-6 whole colon tissue, KC serum, and G-CSF serum, which showed normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The absence of both GPR4 and OGR1 reduces inflammation upon spontaneous colitis. (<b>A</b>) Body weight, ±SEM. (<b>B</b>) MEICS, ±SD. (<b>C</b>) Spleen weight. (<b>D</b>) Colon length, ±SD, and exemplary pictures of colons from each group. (<b>E</b>) Exemplary microscopic pictures of HE-stained colons and histological score. Non-parametric distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons test, Kruskal–Wallis test, two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values and n as indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The absence of both GPR4 and OGR1 reduces CD4/CD8 ratio and macrophages upon spontaneous colitis. Flow cytometry for CD4/CD8 in (<b>A</b>) spleen, and (<b>B</b>) whole colon tissue. (<b>C</b>) qPCR, pro-inflammatory <span class="html-italic">Tnf</span>, <span class="html-italic">Il1β</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Il6</span> in whole colon tissue and lymph nodes as indicated. (<b>D</b>) qPCR, monocyte-attracting <span class="html-italic">Ccl3</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Ccl4</span>. (<b>E</b>) Flow cytometry for F4/80<sup>+</sup> in whole colon tissue and qPCR, <span class="html-italic">Ccl2</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Il1α</span> mainly produced by monocytes. Non-parametric distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test) except for (<b>B</b>), (<b>D</b>) lymph nodes, (<b>E</b>) <span class="html-italic">Ccl2</span> lymph nodes. ±SD, one-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons test, Kruskal–Wallis test, two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values and <span class="html-italic">n</span> as indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Decreased fibrosis in <span class="html-italic">Gpr4</span><sup>−/−</sup> × <span class="html-italic">Ogr1</span><sup>−/−</sup> compared with WT mice upon spontaneous colitis. (<b>A</b>) Sirius red staining and collagen layer thickness. (<b>B</b>) Hydroxyproline assay. (<b>C</b>) qPCR, <span class="html-italic">Col3a1</span>. Normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test), one-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons test, Kruskal–Wallis test, two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli, ±SD, <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values, and <span class="html-italic">n</span> as indicated.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 8926 KiB  
Article
Research on Damage Detection Methods for Concrete Beams Based on Ground Penetrating Radar and Convolutional Neural Networks
by Ning Liu, Ya Ge, Xin Bai, Zi Zhang, Yuhao Shangguan and Yan Li
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 1882; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041882 - 12 Feb 2025
Abstract
Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is a mature and important research method in the field of structural non-destructive testing. However, when the detection target scale is small and the amount of data collected is limited, it poses a serious challenge for this research method. [...] Read more.
Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is a mature and important research method in the field of structural non-destructive testing. However, when the detection target scale is small and the amount of data collected is limited, it poses a serious challenge for this research method. In order to verify the applicability of typical one-dimensional radar signals combined with convolutional neural networks (CNN) in the non-destructive testing of concrete structures, this study created concrete specimens with embedded defects (voids, non-dense solids, and cracks) commonly found in concrete structures in a laboratory setting. High-frequency GPR equipment is used for data acquisition, A-scan data corresponding to different defects is extracted as a training set, and appropriate labeling is carried out. The extracted original radar signals were taken as the input of the CNN model. At the same time, in order to improve the sensitivity of the CNN models to specific damage types, the spectrums of A-scan are also used as part of the training datasets of the CNN models. In this paper, two CNN models with different dimensions are used to train the datasets and evaluate the classification results; one is the traditional one-dimensional CNN model, and the other is the classical two-dimensional CNN architecture AlexNet. In addition, the finite difference time domain (FDTD) model of three-dimensional complex media is established by gprMax, and the propagation characteristics of GPR in concrete media are simulated. The results of applying this method to both simulated and experimental data show that combining the A-scan data of ground penetrating radar and their spectrums as input with the CNN model can effectively identify different types of damage and defects inside the concrete structure. Compared with the one-dimensional CNN model, AlexNet has obvious advantages in extracting complex signal features and processing high-dimensional data. The feasibility of this method in the research field of damage detection of concrete structures has been verified. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ground Penetrating Radar: Data, Imaging, and Signal Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagram of the GPR detection concrete distress principle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Process of the one-dimensional convolution layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Process of the two-dimensional convolution layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Process of the pooling layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The diagram is one-dimensional.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The diagram is two-dimensional.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) H_B0: reinforced concrete beam; (<b>b</b>) H_BF1: 40 mm diameter PVC pipe and 60 mm side length of non-confined solid; (<b>c</b>) H_BF2: 25 mm diameter PVC pipe and 30 mm side length plastic foam.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A heterogeneous numerical model of concrete.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Models of concrete beams with defects: (<b>a</b>) H_B0; (<b>b</b>) H_BF1; (<b>c</b>) H_BF2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Concrete surface line tracks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The setting of prefabricated defects in concrete beams: (<b>a</b>) non-dense material, void, and (<b>b</b>) cracks generated during the experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) GSSI GPR equipment and (<b>b</b>) measurement process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Radar profile features of different defects (Figure (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) are simulation results, while Figure (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are experiment results).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of (<b>a</b>) simulated A-scan and (<b>b</b>) spectrum of simulated A-scan for three different defect types; (<b>c</b>) experimental A-scan and (<b>d</b>) spectrum of experimental A-scan for three different defect types.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The fitting curves of the training process of two kinds of convolutional networks for (<b>a</b>) the one-dimensional CNN and (<b>b</b>) the two-dimensional CNN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Classification results of one-dimensional CNN model for simulated data for (<b>a</b>) the A-scan and (<b>b</b>) the spectrum of the A-scan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Classification results of two-dimensional CNN model for simulated data for (<b>a</b>) the A-scan and (<b>b</b>) the spectrum of the A-scan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Classification results of one-dimensional CNN model for experimental data for (<b>a</b>) the A-scan and (<b>b</b>) the spectrum of the A-scan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Classification results of two-dimensional CNN model for experimental data for (<b>a</b>) the A-scan and (<b>b</b>) the spectrum of the A-scan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Classification results of two-dimensional CNN model for merged data for (<b>a</b>) the A-scan and (<b>b</b>) the spectrum of the A-scan.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Accuracy values for training on experimental and simulated data using (<b>a</b>) the one-dimensional CNN model and (<b>b</b>) the two-dimensional CNN model.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 8809 KiB  
Article
An Integrated Study of Highway Pavement Subsidence Using Ground-Based Geophysical and Satellite Methods
by Michael Frid, Amit Helman, Dror Sharf, Vladi Frid, Wafa Elias and Dan G. Blumberg
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 1758; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041758 - 9 Feb 2025
Abstract
This study investigates highway pavement subsidence along Road 431, Israel, using an integrated geophysical framework that combines Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR), Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT). These methods address the limitations of standalone techniques by correlating surface subsidence [...] Read more.
This study investigates highway pavement subsidence along Road 431, Israel, using an integrated geophysical framework that combines Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR), Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT). These methods address the limitations of standalone techniques by correlating surface subsidence patterns with subsurface anomalies. InSAR identified surface subsidence rates of up to −2.7 cm/year, pinpointing subsidence hotspots, while GPR detected disintegrated fill layers and air voids, and ERT revealed resistivity anomalies at depths of 50–100 m linked to karstic cavities and water infiltration. Validation through borehole drilling confirmed structural heterogeneity, specifically identifying karstic voids in limestone layers and weathered chalk layers that align with the geophysical findings. The findings highlight the complex interplay of geological and hydrological processes driving ground instability, exacerbated by groundwater fluctuations. This study demonstrates the novelty of combining surface and subsurface monitoring methods, offering a detailed diagnostic framework for understanding and mitigating geotechnical risks in transportation infrastructure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Technology for Road Surface Detection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A workflow chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) The general location of the significant subsidence event studied is marked with a yellow star on the Israeli map (Google Earth). (<b>b</b>) Detailed view of Road 431 and the study area, spanning between Modi’in in the east and Ramla in the west. The map integrates satellite imagery and a geological map, highlighting sedimentary formations such as the Bina Formation (green polygons with “Kub” geo-code), the Menuha Formation (brown polygons coded as “Kub”, representing predominantly limestone and dolomite), and Quaternary deposits (in white and gray). Alluvial clays predominantly underlie the terrain. Modified from [<a href="#B29-applsci-15-01758" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Updated night-time orthophoto of the study area following the major subsidence event.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Subsurface layer interpretation with references to drilling logs, SPT values, and the water table. Note typical SPT values for the filling layer—14–35, clay layer—4–8, and marl layer 44–50.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The PSI network shows coherence connections, where the red lines represent low coherence and the blue lines represent high coherence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The network of interferograms for PSI processing shows connections based on 12-day temporal and 181 m spatial baselines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The 2023 subsidence location is marked by a yellow star, highlighting the affected area. Green lines represent the 200 m (500 and 250 MHz) GPR measurement profiles overlaid on a satellite image of the region for spatial context and visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The 2023 subsidence location is marked by a yellow star, indicating the affected area. Light blue lines represent the 527 m ERT measurement profiles overlaid on a satellite image of the region for enhanced spatial understanding.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Coherence map of the study area with the road axis marked in red and the study area highlighted in blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The displacement velocity map along Road 431 shows variations in surface subsidence, with the road axis marked in red. The yellow, red, and purple points exhibit vertical displacement of 0–1.5 cm, 1.5–2.5 cm, and 2.5–3.5 cm per year, respectively; the study area is highlighted in blue. The yellow boxes are the different sections A–D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The distribution of coherent points in the study area highlights the eastern side, where coherence is maintained, and the representative points are selected for focused analysis at 30 m intervals. The yellow, red, and purple points exhibit vertical displacement of 0–1.5 cm, 1.5–2.5 cm, and 2.5–3.5 cm per year, respectively. The blue box is the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Time-series displacement trends for four representative points (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) along Road 431, showing subsidence rates derived from PSI analysis. The blue line indicates the fitted subsidence trend, while the red line represents the zero-displacement baseline.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>An example of radargram recorded in the zone out of the subsidence region. The green line delineates the 2 m-thick soil layer underlying the road structure, while the blue line marks the soil-to-bedrock transition at approximately 4–5 m. A pink line indicates the relatively homogeneous bedrock layer at a depth of 8–9 m, with minor density variations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The results of the L1 measurement line along the southern edge of the northern lane. The radargram reveals structural details, including the water transfer pipe (orange) and the central subsidence area (blue). The lower figure uses color-coded interpretations to clarify subsurface layers: asphalt (green), granular fill (blue), additional fill (pink), and clay soil (red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Measurement line 5L, identifying air voids concentrated in the center of a 70 m subsidence area, which aligns with water flow paths and fine particle displacement. The colored lines on the right side mean the same as the black lines on the left, corresponding to them from the top of the figure toward the bottom.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Lines L3 and L7 reveal a disintegrated fill layer in the southern lane, extending 2 m deep, compared to a more intact structure in the northern lane, with a depth of 1.7 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>A spatial cross-section of the subsidence area across all lanes, illustrating a “winged” depression pattern. The asymmetry, with the western wing elevated above the eastern wing, indicates localized water trapping east of the tilt.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>The GPR findings are synthesized on a map, showing the subsidence area (blue), water channel (yellow), and core subsidence zone with air voids (white).</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>The inversion results for four ERT lines.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1110 KiB  
Article
Cholesin mRNA Expression in Human Intestinal, Liver, and Adipose Tissues
by Hannah Gilliam-Vigh, Malte P. Suppli, Sebastian M. N. Heimbürger, Asger B. Lund, Filip K. Knop and Anne-Marie Ellegaard
Nutrients 2025, 17(4), 619; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17040619 - 8 Feb 2025
Abstract
Objective: Cholesin is a recently discovered gut-derived hormone secreted by enterocytes upon dietary cholesterol uptake via the transmembrane sterol transporter Niemann–Pick disease C1-like intracellular cholesterol transporter 1 (NPC1L1). In the liver, cholesin activates G protein-coupled receptor 146 (GPR146), causing reduced cholesterol synthesis. In [...] Read more.
Objective: Cholesin is a recently discovered gut-derived hormone secreted by enterocytes upon dietary cholesterol uptake via the transmembrane sterol transporter Niemann–Pick disease C1-like intracellular cholesterol transporter 1 (NPC1L1). In the liver, cholesin activates G protein-coupled receptor 146 (GPR146), causing reduced cholesterol synthesis. In this exploratory, hypothesis-generating study based on post hoc analysis, human data on the cholesin system are presented. Methods: Mucosal biopsies were collected throughout the intestinal tract from 12 individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and 12 healthy, matched controls. Upper small intestinal mucosal biopsies were collected from 20 individuals before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. Liver biopsies were collected from 12 men with obesity and 15 matched controls without obesity. Subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue biopsies were collected from 20 men with type 1 diabetes (T1D). All biopsies underwent full mRNA sequencing. Results: Cholesin mRNA expression was observed throughout the intestinal tracts of the individuals with T2D and the controls, in the livers of men with and without obesity, and in adipose tissue of men with T1D. NPC1L1 mRNA expression was robust throughout the small intestines but negligible in the large intestines of both individuals with and without T2D. RYGB surgery induced the expression of NPC1L1 mRNA in the upper small intestine. GPR146 mRNA was expressed in the livers of men, both with and without obesity, and in the adipose tissue of men with T1D, but not in the intestines. Conclusions: Our results suggest a role of the cholesin system in human physiology, but whether it is perturbed in metabolic diseases remains unknown. Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT03044860, NCT03093298, NCT02337660, NCT03734718. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Lipids and Metabolic Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>mRNA expression levels of NPC1L1 in the intestine, in the intestine before and after RYGB, in the liver, and in adipose tissue. mRNA expressions of NPC1L1 in mucosal biopsies sampled throughout the small intestine (white background/light blue background (light blue indicates sections of the intestine where the exact locations of the biopsies were taken with considerable uncertainty)) and the large intestine (grey background) in 12 individuals with type 2 diabetes (blue) and in 12 age- and body-mass-index-matched healthy controls (grey) (<b>A</b>); in small intestinal mucosal samples from 19 individuals collected after RYGB in the alimentary limb (yellow), biliopancreatic limb (orange), common channel (red), and before RYGB (grey) (<b>B</b>); in transcutaneously sampled liver biopsies from 12 men with obesity (green) and 15 lean controls (grey) (<b>C</b>); in subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies from 20 men with type 1 diabetes (grey) (<b>D</b>). Dots are individual data points; boxes represent inter-quartile ranges, and whiskers extend from the 25th percentile to the smallest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range below it and from the 75th percentile to the largest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range above it (encompassing data points not deemed outliers). Statistical significance is represented as follows: ** for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, * for <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. For non-significant results (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≥ 0.05), the <span class="html-italic">p</span> values are not displayed. Abbreviations: Asc., ascending; Desc., descending; NPC1L1, Niemann–Pick disease C1-like intracellular cholesterol transporter 1; Post AL, postsurgery alimentary limb; Post BL, postsurgery biliopancreatic limb; Post CC, postsurgery common channel; Pre, presurgery; RPKM, reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads; Trans., transverse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>mRNA expression levels of cholesin in the intestine, in the intestine before and after RYGB, in the liver, and in the adipose tissue. mRNA expression of cholesin in mucosal biopsies sampled throughout the small intestine (white background/light blue background (light blue indicates sections of the intestine where the exact locations of the biopsies were taken with considerable uncertainty)) and the large intestine (grey background) in 12 individuals with type 2 diabetes (blue) and in 12 age- and body-mass-index-matched healthy controls (grey) (<b>A</b>); in small intestinal mucosal samples from 19 individuals collected after RYGB in the alimentary limb (yellow), biliopancreatic limb (orange), common channel (red), and before RYGB (grey) (<b>B</b>); in transcutaneously sampled liver biopsies from 12 men with obesity (green) and 15 lean controls (grey) (<b>C</b>); in subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies from 20 men with type 1 diabetes (grey) (<b>D</b>). Dots are individual data points; boxes represent inter-quartile ranges, and whiskers extend from the 25th percentile to the smallest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range below it and from the 75th percentile to the largest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range above it (encompassing data points not deemed outliers). Abbreviations: Asc., ascending; Desc., descending; Post AL, postsurgery alimentary limb; Post BL, postsurgery biliopancreatic limb; Post CC, postsurgery common channel; Pre, presurgery; RPKM, reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads; Trans., transverse.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>mRNA expression levels of GPR146 in the intestine, in the intestine before and after RYGB, in the liver, and in the adipose tissue. mRNA expression of GPR146 in mucosal biopsies sampled throughout the small intestine (white background/light blue background (light blue indicates sections of the intestine where the exact locations of the biopsies were taken with considerable uncertainty)) and the large intestine (grey background) in 12 individuals with type 2 diabetes (blue) and in 12 age- and body-mass-index-matched healthy controls (grey) (<b>A</b>); in small intestinal mucosal samples from 19 individuals collected after RYGB in the alimentary limb (yellow), biliopancreatic limb (orange), common channel (red), and before RYGB (grey) (<b>B</b>); in transcutaneous liver biopsies from 12 men with obesity (green) and 15 lean controls (grey) (<b>C</b>); in subcutaneously sampled adipose tissue biopsies from 20 men with type 1 diabetes (grey) (<b>D</b>). Dots are individual data points; boxes represent inter-quartile ranges, and whiskers extend from the 25th percentile to the smallest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range below it and from the 75th percentile to the largest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range above it (encompassing data points not deemed outliers). Abbreviations: Asc., ascending; Desc., descending; GPR146, G protein-coupled receptor 146; Post AL, postsurgery alimentary limb; Post BL, postsurgery biliopancreatic limb; Post CC, postsurgery common channel; Pre, presurgery; RPKM, reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads; Trans., transverse.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 4232 KiB  
Article
Data-Driven Machine-Learning-Based Seismic Response Prediction and Damage Classification for an Unreinforced Masonry Building
by Nagavinothini Ravichandran, Butsawan Bidorn, Oya Mercan and Balamurugan Paneerselvam
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 1686; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041686 - 7 Feb 2025
Abstract
Unreinforced masonry buildings are highly vulnerable to earthquake damage due to their limited ability to withstand lateral loads, compared to other structures. Therefore, a detailed assessment of the seismic response and resultant damage associated with such buildings becomes necessary. The present study employs [...] Read more.
Unreinforced masonry buildings are highly vulnerable to earthquake damage due to their limited ability to withstand lateral loads, compared to other structures. Therefore, a detailed assessment of the seismic response and resultant damage associated with such buildings becomes necessary. The present study employs machine learning models to effectively predict the seismic response and classify the damage level for a benchmark unreinforced masonry building. In this regard, eight regression-based models, namely, Linear Regression (LR), Stepwise Linear Regression (SLR), Ridge Regression (RR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Neural Networks (NN), were used to predict the building’s responses. Additionally, eight classification-based models, namely, Naïve Bayes (NB), Discriminant Analysis (DA), K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Adaptive Boosting (AB), DT, RF, SVM, and NN, were explored for the purpose of categorizing the damage states of the building. The material properties of the masonry and the earthquake intensity were considered as the input parameters. The results from the regression models indicate that the GPR model efficiently predicts the seismic response with larger coefficients of determination and smaller root mean square error values than other models. Among the classification-based models, the RF, AB, and NN models effectively classify the damage states with accuracy levels of 92.9%, 91.1%, and 92.6%, respectively. In conclusion, the overall performance of the non-parametric models, such as GPR, NN, and RF, was found to be better than that of the parametric models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Seismic Design and Evaluation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Methodology of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Typical URM building with reinforced concrete slab in India.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Plan of the benchmark URM building [<a href="#B30-applsci-15-01686" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-applsci-15-01686" class="html-bibr">31</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) FE model of the benchmark URM building; (<b>b</b>) normal stress–strain curve; and (<b>c</b>) shear stress–strain curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation of PGA for the selected ground-motion records with (<b>a</b>) moment magnitude; and (<b>b</b>) epicentral distance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Limit-states definition of the URM building.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Distribution of the damage states in the developed database.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Actual response and predicted response by the regression models: (<b>a</b>) LR, (<b>b</b>) SLR, (<b>c</b>) RR, (<b>d</b>) DT, (<b>e</b>) RF, (<b>f</b>) SVM, (<b>g</b>) GPR, and (<b>h</b>) NN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of results of training and test sets of regression models: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> values and (<b>b</b>) RMSE values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Percentage variations for the (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and (<b>b</b>) RMSE values of the training and test sets of the regression models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Confusion matrices for the classification models in terms of damage state identification: (<b>a</b>) NB, (<b>b</b>) DA, (<b>c</b>) KNN, (<b>d</b>) DT, (<b>e</b>) RF, (<b>f</b>) AB, (<b>g</b>) SVM, and (<b>h</b>) NN.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of results of the classification models: (<b>a</b>) accuracy, (<b>b</b>) F1 score, (<b>c</b>) precision, and (<b>d</b>) recall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Relative importance of input parameters affecting the Random Forest classification model.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 1924 KiB  
Article
Deep Learning-Based Ground-Penetrating Radar Inversion for Tree Roots in Heterogeneous Soil
by Xibei Li, Xi Cheng, Yunjie Zhao, Binbin Xiang and Taihong Zhang
Sensors 2025, 25(3), 947; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25030947 - 5 Feb 2025
Abstract
Tree roots are vital for tree ecosystems; accurate root detection helps analyze the health of trees and supports the effective management of resources such as fertilizers, water and pesticides. In this paper, a deep learning-based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) inversion method is proposed to [...] Read more.
Tree roots are vital for tree ecosystems; accurate root detection helps analyze the health of trees and supports the effective management of resources such as fertilizers, water and pesticides. In this paper, a deep learning-based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) inversion method is proposed to simultaneously image the spatial distribution of permittivity for subsurface tree roots and layered heterogeneous soils in real time. Additionally, a GPR simulation data set and a measured data set are built in this study, which were used to train inversion models and validate the effectiveness of GPR inversion methods.The introduced GPR inversion model is a pyramid convolutional network with vision transformer and edge inversion auxiliary task (PyViTENet), which combines pyramidal convolution and vision transformer to improve the diversity and accuracy of data feature extraction. Furthermore, by adding the task of edge inversion of the permittivity distribution of underground materials, the model focuses more on the details of heterogeneous structures. The experimental results show that, for the case of buried scatterers in layered heterogeneous soil, the PyViTENet performs better than other deep learning methods on the simulation data set. It can more accurately invert the permittivity of scatterers and the soil stratification. The most notable advantage of PyViTENet is that it can accurately capture the heterogeneous structural details of the soil within the layer since the soil around the tree roots in the real scene is layered soil and each layer of soil is also heterogeneous due to factors such as humidity, proportion of different soil particles, etc.In order to further verify the effectiveness of the proposed inversion method, this study applied the PyViTENet to GPR measured data through transfer learning for reconstructing the permittivity, shape, and position information of scatterers in the actual scene. The proposed model shows good generalization ability and accuracy, and provides a basis for non-destructive detection of underground scatterers and their surrounding medium. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Radar Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The structure of the GPR inversion model PyViTENet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The structure of PyConvFEB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The structure of the ViTFEB module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>GPR model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Soil texture classification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Inversion results. (<b>a</b>) Preprocessed B-scans. (<b>b</b>) Ground truths of the relative permittivity distribution of underground material. (<b>c</b>–<b>i</b>) Predicted relative permittivity distributions from (<b>c</b>) FWI, (<b>d</b>) U-Net, (<b>e</b>) GPRInvNet, (<b>f</b>) DMRF-UNet, (<b>g</b>) TransUNet, (<b>h</b>) EDMFEBs and (<b>i</b>) PyViTENet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>An enlarged view of the inversion results on the detailed structure within the soil obtained by different inversion methods. The right side of the figure is a magnified view of the inversion results corresponding to the red area on the left side. The different colors represent the same values as in <a href="#sensors-25-00947-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Results of ablation experiment. (<b>a</b>) Ground truths. (<b>b</b>) The main inversion task using PyConvFEBs only. (<b>c</b>) The main inversion task using PyConvFEBs and ViTFEB. (<b>d</b>) The main inversion task using PyConvFEBs and the edge inversion auxiliary task (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>). (<b>e</b>) The main inversion task using PyConvFEBs and the edge inversion auxiliary task (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>). (<b>f</b>) PyViTENet (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>). (<b>g</b>) PyViTENet (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>). The different colors represent the same values as in <a href="#sensors-25-00947-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The experimental site of the real dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of the inversion results of each method on the real dataset. (<b>a</b>) Preprocessed B-scans. (<b>b</b>) Ground truths of the relative permittivity distribution of underground material. (<b>c</b>–<b>i</b>) Predicted relative permittivity distributions from (<b>c</b>) FWI, (<b>d</b>) U-Net, (<b>e</b>) GPRInvNet, (<b>f</b>) DMRF-UNet, (<b>g</b>) TransUNet, (<b>h</b>) EDMFEBs and (<b>i</b>) PyViTENet.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 4306 KiB  
Article
Adaptive Variational Mode Decomposition and Principal Component Analysis-Based Denoising Scheme for Borehole Radar Data
by Ding Yang, Cheng Guo, Raffaele Persico, Yajie Liu, Handing Liu, Changjin Bai, Chao Lian and Qing Zhao
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(3), 525; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030525 - 3 Feb 2025
Abstract
To address the significant impact of noise on the target detection performance of borehole radar (BHR), a key type of ground-penetrating radar (GPR), a denoising scheme based on the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) for adaptive variational mode decomposition (VMD) and multiscale principal component [...] Read more.
To address the significant impact of noise on the target detection performance of borehole radar (BHR), a key type of ground-penetrating radar (GPR), a denoising scheme based on the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) for adaptive variational mode decomposition (VMD) and multiscale principal component analysis (MSPCA) is proposed. This study initially conducts the modal decomposition of BHR data using an improved adaptive VMD method based on the WOA; it then automatically selects modes meeting specific frequency band standards. The correlation coefficients between these modes and the original signal are computed, discarding weakly correlated modes before signal reconstruction. Finally, MSPCA further suppresses noise, yielding denoised BHR data. Simulations show that the proposed scheme increases the signal-to-noise ratio by 17.964 dB or higher, surpassing the more established denoising techniques of robust principal component analysis (RPCA), MSPCA, and empirical mode decomposition (EMD), and obtains the most favorable results in terms of the RMSE and MSE metrics. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed scheme more effectively suppresses vertical and random noise signals in BHR data. Both the numerical simulations and experimental results confirm the effectiveness of this scheme in noise reduction for BHR data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) Technologies and Applications)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Processing workflow of the proposed scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Experimental configuration for acquisition of target Bscan data through BHR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>BHR-simulated Bscan data results. (<b>a</b>) Noise-free BHR-simulated Bscan data. (<b>b</b>) Noise-added Bscan data, −5.826 dB SNR. The denoised result for (<b>c</b>) RNMF-only, (<b>d</b>) RPCA-only, (<b>e</b>) MSPCA-only, (<b>f</b>) EMD-only, (<b>g</b>) the proposed adaptive VMD method, and (<b>h</b>) the proposed scheme (adaptive VMD + MSPCA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparisons of SNR, RMSE, and MSE are provided for various methods, including RNMF-only [<a href="#B31-remotesensing-17-00525" class="html-bibr">31</a>], RPCA-only [<a href="#B33-remotesensing-17-00525" class="html-bibr">33</a>], MSPCA-only [<a href="#B42-remotesensing-17-00525" class="html-bibr">42</a>], EMD-only [<a href="#B51-remotesensing-17-00525" class="html-bibr">51</a>], the proposed adaptive VMD method, and the proposed scheme (adaptive VMD + MSPCA) under numerical simulation data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Original noise-free BHR simulation data for the 160th Ascan. (<b>b</b>) Noise-added Ascan data. The denoised result for (<b>c</b>) RNMF-only, (<b>d</b>) RPCA-only, (<b>e</b>) MSPCA-only, (<b>f</b>) EMD-only, (<b>g</b>) the proposed adaptive VMD method, and (<b>h</b>) the proposed scheme (adaptive VMD + MSPCA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Output (<b>a</b>) SNR, (<b>b</b>) MSE, and (<b>c</b>) RMSE of the input noisy data with varied SNRs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>BHR-simulated Bscan data results. (<b>a</b>) Noise-free BHR-simulated Bscan data. (<b>b</b>) Noise-added Bscan data, −7.63 dB SNR. The denoised result for (<b>c</b>) RNMF-only, (<b>d</b>) RPCA-only, (<b>e</b>) MSPCA-only, (<b>f</b>) EMD-only, (<b>g</b>) the proposed adaptive VMD method, and (<b>h</b>) the proposed scheme (adaptive VMD + MSPCA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparisons of SNR, RMSE, and MSE are provided for various methods, including RNMF-only [<a href="#B31-remotesensing-17-00525" class="html-bibr">31</a>], RPCA-only [<a href="#B33-remotesensing-17-00525" class="html-bibr">33</a>], MSPCA-only [<a href="#B42-remotesensing-17-00525" class="html-bibr">42</a>], EMD-only [<a href="#B51-remotesensing-17-00525" class="html-bibr">51</a>], the proposed adaptive VMD method, and the proposed scheme (adaptive VMD + MSPCA), under numerical simulation data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Original noise-free BHR simulation data for the 160th Ascan. (<b>b</b>) Noise-added Ascan data. The denoised result for (<b>c</b>) RNMF-only, (<b>d</b>) RPCA-only, (<b>e</b>) MSPCA-only, (<b>f</b>) EMD-only, (<b>g</b>) the proposed adaptive VMD method, and (<b>h</b>) the proposed scheme (adaptive VMD + MSPCA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Output (<b>a</b>) SNR, (<b>b</b>) MSE, and (<b>c</b>) RMSE of the input noisy data with varied SNR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Complete structural diagram of the BHR system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>BHR experiment Bscan data results. (<b>a</b>) Bscan data processed through basic methods. The denoised result for (<b>b</b>) RNMF-only, (<b>c</b>) RPCA-only, (<b>d</b>) MSPCA-only, (<b>e</b>) EMD-only, (<b>f</b>) the proposed adaptive VMD method, and (<b>g</b>) the proposed scheme (adaptive VMD + MSPCA).</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 8483 KiB  
Article
Inlet Passage Hydraulic Performance Optimization of Coastal Drainage Pump System Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
by Tao Jiang, Weigang Lu, Linguang Lu, Lei Xu, Wang Xi, Jianfeng Liu and Ye Zhu
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(2), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13020274 - 31 Jan 2025
Abstract
The axial-flow pump system has been widely applied to coastal drainage pump stations, but the hydraulic performance optimization based on the contraction angles of the inlet passage has not been studied. This paper combined the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method, machine learning (ML) [...] Read more.
The axial-flow pump system has been widely applied to coastal drainage pump stations, but the hydraulic performance optimization based on the contraction angles of the inlet passage has not been studied. This paper combined the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method, machine learning (ML) algorithms and genetic algorithm (GA) to find the optimal contraction angles of the inlet passage. The 125 sets of comprehensive objective function were obtained by the CFD method. Three contraction angles and comprehensive objective function values were regressed by three ML algorithms. After hyperparameter optimization, the Gaussian process regression (GPR) model had the highest R2 = 0.958 in the test set and had the strongest generalization ability among the three models. The impact degree of the three contraction angles on the objective function of the GPR model was investigated by the Sobol sensitivity analysis method; the results indicated that the order of impact degree from high to low was θ3>θ2>θ1. The optimal objective function values of the GPR model and corresponding contraction angles were searched through GA; the maximum objective function value was 0.963 and corresponding contraction angles were θ1=13.34°, θ2=28.36° and θ3=3.64°, respectively. The results of this study can provide reference for the optimization of inlet passages in coastal drainage pump systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Components of pump system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Model dimension of inlet passage and axial pump (unit: mm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Model perspective drawing of inlet passage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Boundary conditions and grid generation of calculation domains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Relationship between hydraulic loss and grid number.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Grid distribution of computational domains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Photo of model test rig.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Photo of flow state of inlet passage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Contraction angles and comprehensive objective function values of inlet passage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Relationship between predicted response and actual response of different regression models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Relationship between predicted response and actual response of different regression models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p><span class="html-italic">R</span><sup>2</sup> values of different regression models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Global sensitivity coefficient of three contraction angles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Variation in three constraint angles and objective function values with generations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Values of various hydraulic performance indicators of original scheme and optimal scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Location of control planes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Flow state on plane 1 of inlet passage of original scheme and optimal scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Turbulent dissipation rate on plane 1 of inlet passage of original scheme and optimal scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Velocity distribution on plane 2 of inlet passage of original scheme and optimal scheme.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 4617 KiB  
Review
A Review of Advanced Soil Moisture Monitoring Techniques for Slope Stability Assessment
by Yongsheng Yao, Jiabin Fan and Jue Li
Water 2025, 17(3), 390; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17030390 - 31 Jan 2025
Abstract
Slope failures caused by changes in soil moisture content have become a growing global concern, resulting in significant loss of life and economic damage. To ensure the stability of slopes, it is necessary to accurately monitor the moisture content and understand the complex [...] Read more.
Slope failures caused by changes in soil moisture content have become a growing global concern, resulting in significant loss of life and economic damage. To ensure the stability of slopes, it is necessary to accurately monitor the moisture content and understand the complex interactions between soil, water, and slope behavior. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of advanced soil moisture detection techniques for unsaturated soil slopes, including point-scale measurements and geophysical methods. It first introduces the fundamental concepts of the soil–water characteristic curve (SWCC) and its influence on the shear strength and stability of unsaturated soil slopes. It then delves into the working principles and applications of various point-scale measurement techniques, such as time-domain reflectometry (TDR), frequency-domain reflectometry (FDR), and neutron probe methods. Additionally, this paper explores the use of geophysiDear Editor: The author has checked that the name and affiliation are accuratecal methods, including ground-penetrating radar (GPR), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), and electromagnetic induction (EMI), for the non-invasive assessment of soil moisture conditions and slope stability monitoring. This review highlights the advantages of integrating multiple geophysical techniques, combined with traditional geotechnical and hydrological measurements, to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the subsurface conditions and their influence on slope stability. Several case studies are presented to demonstrate the successful application of this integrated approach in various slope monitoring scenarios. The continued advancement in these areas will contribute to the development of more accurate, reliable, and widely adopted solutions for the assessment and management of slope stability risks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Typical water retention curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Infiltration rates of different soils.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>TDR system schematic.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationship between soil dielectric constant and moisture content.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>FDR simplified model and testing principle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Different types of GPR devices and their schematics: (<b>a</b>) air-coupled GPR; (<b>b</b>) ground-coupled GPR; (<b>c</b>) borehole-coupled GPR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ERT working principle diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>EMI schematic diagram.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 1562 KiB  
Article
Improved Confidence-Interval Estimations Using Uncertainty Measure and Weighted Feature Decisions for Cuff-Less Blood-Pressure Measurements
by Soojeong Lee, Mugahed A. Al-antari and Gyanendra Prasad Joshi
Bioengineering 2025, 12(2), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12020131 - 30 Jan 2025
Abstract
This paper presents a method to improve confidence-interval (CI) estimation using individual uncertainty measures and weighted feature decisions for cuff-less blood-pressure (BP) measurement. We obtained uncertainty using Gaussian process regression (GPR). The CI obtained from the GPR model is computed using the distribution [...] Read more.
This paper presents a method to improve confidence-interval (CI) estimation using individual uncertainty measures and weighted feature decisions for cuff-less blood-pressure (BP) measurement. We obtained uncertainty using Gaussian process regression (GPR). The CI obtained from the GPR model is computed using the distribution of BP estimates, which provides relatively wide CIs. Thus, we proposed a method to obtain improved CIs for individual subjects by applying bootstrap and uncertainty methods using the cuff-less BP estimates of each subject obtained through GPR. This study also introduced a novel method to estimate cuff-less BP with high fidelity by determining highly weighted features using weighted feature decisions. The standard deviation of the proposed method’s mean error is 2.94 mmHg and 1.50 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and (DBP), respectively. The mean absolute error results were obtained by weighted feature determination combining GPR and gradient boosting algorithms (GBA) for SBP (1.46 mmHg) and DBP (0.69 mmHg). The study confirmed that the BP estimates were within the CI based on the test samples of almost all subjects. The weighted feature decisions combining GPR and GBA were more accurate and reliable for cuff-less BP estimation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The lock diagram of proposed WFD based on GPR for cuff-less BP and CI estimations, where (<b>a</b>) is data collection, (<b>b</b>) denotes a dual-step preprocessing, (<b>c</b>) is multiple feature extraction sets, (<b>d</b>) presents after-processing, (<b>e</b>) denotes WFD process, and (<b>f</b>) presents uncertainty estimation using bootstrap and uncertainty algorithms for individual subject.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>SQI algorithm for detecting bad PPG/ECG signals [<a href="#B30-bioengineering-12-00131" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The features on each waveform of the PPGs and ECGs for cuff-less BP and CI estimations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Bland–Altman plots for the proposed WFD combining GPR and GBA methodology represent very little difference from the referenced SBP (<b>a</b>) and DBP (<b>b</b>); the RF algorithm comparing its performance using reference ABP (mmHg) with respect to the SD of ME for SBP (<b>c</b>) and DBP (<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Panel (<b>a</b>) shows the CI estimation using the proposed WFD based on the combined GPR and GBA to represent the uncertainty of SBP estimation in cuff-less BP estimation (the 3000 to 3500 sample). Panel (<b>b</b>) shows the CI estimation using the proposed WFD based on the combined GPR and GBA to represent the uncertainty of DBP in cuff-less BP estimation (the 3000 to 3500 sample).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Panel (<b>a</b>) denotes the individual CI estimated using the bootstrap and uncertainty methods based on GPR, representing the uncertainty of SBP estimation from cuff-less BP estimates for one example subject (1 to 10 samples). Panel (<b>b</b>) denotes the individual CI estimated using the bootstrap and uncertainty methods based on GPR, representing the uncertainty of DBP estimation from cuff-less BP estimates for one example subject (1 to 10 samples). Panel (<b>c</b>) presents the CI individual estimated using the bootstrap and uncertainty methods based on GPR, representing the uncertainty of SBP estimation from cuff-less BP estimates for another example subject (1 to 10 samples). Panel (<b>d</b>) presents the individual CI estimated using the bootstrap and uncertainty methods based on GPR, representing the uncertainty of DBP estimation from cuff-less BP estimates for another example subject (1 to 10 samples).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop