Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Physiological Responses of Tree Fruits to Environmental and Management Factors

A special issue of Plants (ISSN 2223-7747).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 February 2021) | Viewed by 59147

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 4 ingresso H, 90128 Palermo, Italy
Interests: water relations; carbon partitioning; deficit irrigation; fruit quality and production systems of tree crops
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,
Today, climatic changes and the sustainability of management practices are two major priorities for tree fruit scientists and growers. In the last few decades, plant molecular techniques have represented, and continue to represent, a very powerful tool. Together, plant molecular biology and biochemistry have boosted advances in basic tree physiology and fruit production. On the other hand, the tremendous advances in sensors (proximal and remote), as well as the application of information, communication, and artificial intelligence technologies to several smart solutions, have opened the doors to a wide array of precision operations for the sustainable management of tree fruits, promising a significant increase in production efficiency.

Nevertheless, trees respond to external stimuli by adjusting several physiological processes. All those physiological adjustments have small or large direct or indirect effects on tree growth and fruit production. Hence, to understand why trees grow and produce differently under various environmental and management regimes, we need to acquire a full comprehension of these complex mechanisms and processes and their modulation in response to external factors.

Today, our understanding of whole-tree functioning as the integration of multiple physiological processes is suffering from, on one side, a knowledge gap with respect to advanced information on basic molecular mechanisms, and on the other side, the potential application of smart technologies for precise orchard management. Such a gap can be filled by fostering studies on applied physiological processes related to tree growth and fruit production modifications mediated by environmental and management factors.

This Special Issue seeks to stimulate and collect these kind of studies keeping in mind that whole-tree fruit physiology must represent the basis for sustainable fruit production in a changing environment. All improvements in orchard and vineyard management systems have been, and will continue to be, achieved through advances in tree fruit physiology, from basic molecular processes to integrated whole-tree mechanisms affecting growth and fruit production.

Dr. Riccardo Lo Bianco
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Plants is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • branch autonomy
  • carbohydrate metabolism
  • carbon partitioning
  • crop load
  • drought
  • fruit development
  • fruit quality
  • fruit tree growth
  • light interception
  • net assimilation
  • nutrient use efficiency
  • root growth and architecture
  • source–sink relations
  • yield efficiency
  • water deficit
  • water relations
  • water-use efficiency
  • whole-tree physiology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (14 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

27 pages, 14927 KiB  
Article
‘Honeycrisp’ Bitter Pit Response to Rootstock and Region under Eastern New York Climatic Conditions
by Daniel J. Donahue, Gemma Reig Córdoba, Sarah E. Elone, Anna E. Wallis and Michael R. Basedow
Plants 2021, 10(5), 983; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050983 - 14 May 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2482
Abstract
There are still unknown factors at play in the causation of bitter pit in ‘Honeycrisp’ as well as in other apple varieties. To investigate some of these factors, we conducted a survey of 34 ‘Honeycrisp’ orchard blocks distributed across two disparate production regions [...] Read more.
There are still unknown factors at play in the causation of bitter pit in ‘Honeycrisp’ as well as in other apple varieties. To investigate some of these factors, we conducted a survey of 34 ‘Honeycrisp’ orchard blocks distributed across two disparate production regions in eastern New York State, representing a variety of rootstocks, over three growing seasons. Weather, soil, horticultural traits, fruit quality traits, pick timing, leaf and peel minerals were evaluated for their impact on bitter pit (BP) incidence; factors were further evaluated for their interaction with region and rootstock. ‘Honeycrisp’ trees on B.9 rootstock were smaller but with comparable terminal shoot growth when compared to those on M.26 and M.9 rootstocks. B.9 fruits, which had similar fruit size to M.26 and M.9 and had good fruit quality at harvest and after storage, were much less likely to express bitter pit symptoms compared to M.9 and M.26 rootstocks. Not all traits evaluated individually correlated significatively with bitter pit incidence after a period in storage. Depending on rootstock and region, the correlation could be significant in one situation, with no correlation at all in another. In this study, peel Mg/Ca ratio and peel Ca correlated with BP for all three rootstocks, with the strongest correlations associated with the M.9 clones. These same traits correlated with BP for both regions. Pick timing had a significant influence on BP incidence following storage, with later picks offering better bitter pit storage performance. While excessively large fruits, those in the 48 and 56 count size categories, were found to be highly susceptible to BP regardless of rootstock, B.9 BP fruit susceptibility for smaller sizes was found to be size neutral. A PLSR prediction model for each rootstock and each region showed that different variables correlated to BP depending on the situation. Thus, the results could suggest that in addition to the variables considered in this study, there are other less studied factors that can influence the expression of BP symptoms. We strongly suggest that rootstock BP performance be considered a critical parameter when planning a commercial ‘Honeycrisp’ orchard and be evaluated in rootstock breeding and development programs prior to wide commercial release. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the study domain in Eastern New York State, USA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Region effect on ‘Honeycrisp’ bitter pit incidence after 120 days of refrigerated storage with all rootstocks and years combined (<b>A</b>), in 2016 with all rootstocks combined (<b>B</b>), in 2017 with all rootstocks combined (<b>C</b>), and in 2018 with all rootstocks combined. JMP Fit XY Platform, Analysis of Means of Proportions of the binomial dataset, alpha = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Rootstock effect on ‘Honeycrisp’ bitter pit incidence (<b>A</b>) and on ‘Honeycrisp’ bitter pit severity (<b>B</b>) after 120 days of refrigerated storage with all years and both regions combined (A). JMP Fit XY Platform, Analysis of Means of Proportions of the binomial dataset, alpha = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Rootstock effect on ‘Honeycrisp’ bitter pit incidence after 120 days of refrigerated storage in 2016 (<b>A</b>), in 2017 (<b>B</b>), and in 2018 (<b>C</b>) with both regions combined. JMP Fit XY Platform, Analysis of Means of Proportions of the binomial dataset, alpha = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Pick timing effect on ‘Honeycrisp’ bitter pit incidence at harvest (<b>A</b>) and after 120 days of refrigerated storage (<b>B</b>) with all rootstocks and years combined. JMP Fit XY Platform, Analysis of Means of Proportions of the binomial dataset, alpha = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Pick timing effect on CV ‘Honeycrisp’ orchards (<b>A</b>) and HV ‘Honeycrisp’ orchards (<b>B</b>), bitter pit incidence after 120 days of refrigerated storage with all years combined. JMP Fit XY Platform, Analysis of Means of Proportions of the binomial dataset, alpha = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Pick timing effect on B.9 (<b>A</b>), M.26 (<b>B</b>), and M.9 Clone (<b>C</b>) ‘Honeycrisp’ orchards bitter pit incidence after 120 days of refrigerated storage with all years and regions combined. JMP Fit XY Platform, Analysis of Means of Proportions of the binomial dataset, alpha = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Picking time effect at harvest on ‘Honeycrisp’ fruit weight (<b>A</b>) and flesh firmness (<b>B</b>) with all rootstocks and years combined. As expected, fruit size increased with each subsequent pick, and fruit firmness decreased. JMP Fit XY Platform, Analysis of Means of Proportions of the binomial dataset, alpha = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>‘Honeycrisp’ bitter pit incidence after 120 days storage by count size category, all rootstocks, regions, and years (<b>A</b>), and by B.9 (<b>B</b>), M.26 (<b>C</b>) and M.9 clone (<b>D</b>) all regions and all years. JMP Fit XY Platform, Analysis of Means of Proportions of the binomial dataset, alpha = 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Results obtained from the partial least square (PLS) analysis between BP incidence at 120 DAH and the rest of variables evaluated all three years and all rootstocks together for CV. (<b>A</b>) Important X variables in the PLS model, (<b>B</b>) correlation loading plot, and (<b>C</b>) observed values versus PLSR-predicted values for BP. Abbreviations: ALTS: average length terminal shoot; DD1: degree days accumulated from 1st of January to harvest date; DD2: degree days accumulated from 60 days post-bloom; FD: fruit diameter; FF1: flesh firmness at harvest; FF2: flesh firmness after storage; FW: fruit weight; L: length; SSC1: soluble solids content at harvest; SSC2: soluble solids content after storage; SM1: average soil moisture 12 weeks prior to harvest; SM2: average soil moisture from 1st of January to harvest date; TA1: titratable acidity at harvest; TA2: titratable acidity after storage; TCSA: trunk cross-sectional area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Results obtained from the partial least square (PLS) analysis between BP incidence at 120 DAH and the rest of variables evaluated all three years and all rootstocks together for HV. (<b>A</b>) Important X variables in the PLS model, (<b>B</b>) correlation loading plot, and (<b>C</b>) observed values versus PLSR-predicted values for BP. Abbreviations: ATS: average length terminal shoot; DD1: degree days accumulated from 1st of January to harvest date; DD2: degree days accumulated from 60 days post-bloom; FD: fruit diameter; FF1: flesh firmness at harvest; FF2: flesh firmness after storage; FW: fruit weight; L: length; SSC1: soluble solids content at harvest; SSC2: soluble solids content after storage; SM1: average soil moisture 12 weeks prior to harvest; SM2: average soil moisture from 1st of January to harvest date; TA1: titratable acidity at harvest; TA2: titratable acidity after storage; TCSA: trunk cross-sectional area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Results obtained from the partial least square (PLS) analysis between BP incidence at 120 DAH and the rest of variables evaluated all three years together for B.9 rootstock in HV and CV. (<b>A</b>) Important X variables in the PLS model, (<b>B</b>) correlation loading plot, and (<b>C</b>) observed values versus PLSR-predicted values for BP. Abbreviations: ALTS: average length terminal shoot; DD1: degree days accumulated from 1st of January to harvest date; DD2: degree days accumulated from 60 days post-bloom; FD: fruit diameter; FF1: flesh firmness at harvest; FF2: flesh firmness after storage; FW: fruit weight; L: length; SSC1: soluble solids content at harvest; SSC2: soluble solids content after storage; SM1: average soil moisture 12 weeks prior to harvest; SM2: average soil moisture from 1st of January to harvest date; TA1: titratable acidity at harvest; TA2: titratable acidity after storage; TCSA: trunk cross-sectional area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Results obtained from the partial least square (PLS) analysis between BP incidence at 120 DAH and the rest of variables evaluated all three years together for M.26 rootstock in HV and CV. (<b>A</b>) Important X variables in the PLS model, (<b>B</b>) correlation loading plot, and (<b>C</b>) observed values versus PLSR-predicted values for BP. Abbreviations: ALTS: average length terminal shoot; DD1: degree days accumulated from 1st of January to harvest date; DD2: degree days accumulated from 60 days post-bloom; FD: fruit diameter; FF1: flesh firmness at harvest; FF2: flesh firmness after storage; FW: fruit weight; L: length; SSC1: soluble solids content at harvest; SSC2: soluble solids content after storage; SM1: average soil moisture 12 weeks prior to harvest; SM2: average soil moisture from 1st of January to harvest date; TA1: titratable acidity at harvest; TA2: titratable acidity after storage; TCSA: trunk cross-sectional area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Results obtained from the partial least square (PLS) analysis between BP incidence at 120 DAH and the rest of variables evaluated all three years together for M.9 clone rootstocks in HV and CV. (<b>A</b>) Important X variables in the PLS model, (<b>B</b>) correlation loading plot, and (<b>C</b>) observed values versus PLSR-predicted values for BP. Abbreviations: ALTS: average length terminal shoot; DD1: degree days accumulated from 1st of January to harvest date; DD2: degree days accumulated from 60 days post-bloom; FD: fruit diameter; FF1: flesh firmness at harvest; FF2: flesh firmness after storage; FW: fruit weight; L: length; SSC1: soluble solids content at harvest; SSC2: soluble solids content after storage; SM1: average soil moisture 12 weeks prior to harvest; SM2: average soil moisture from 1st of January to harvest date; TA1: titratable acidity at harvest; TA2: titratable acidity after storage; TCSA: trunk cross-sectional area.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 1673 KiB  
Article
Soil and Regulated Deficit Irrigation Affect Growth, Yield and Quality of ‘Nero d’Avola’ Grapes in a Semi-Arid Environment
by Maria Gabriella Barbagallo, Giuseppe Vesco, Rosario Di Lorenzo, Riccardo Lo Bianco and Antonino Pisciotta
Plants 2021, 10(4), 641; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040641 - 28 Mar 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3040
Abstract
The present work studied the effect of two consecutive years of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) compared to rain fed management on the vegetative growth, yield, and quality of ‘Nero d’Avola’ grapes. The trial was conducted separately in two soils (vertisol and entisol) located [...] Read more.
The present work studied the effect of two consecutive years of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) compared to rain fed management on the vegetative growth, yield, and quality of ‘Nero d’Avola’ grapes. The trial was conducted separately in two soils (vertisol and entisol) located at the top and bottom hillside of the same vineyard. Vertisol was characterized by greater depth, organic matter, exchangeable K2O, and total N than entisol. RDI was based on an irrigation volume at 25% of estimated crop evapotranspiration (ETc) up to end of veraison and 10% of estimated ETc up to 15 days before harvest. Predawn water potential (PDWP) was used as indicator of plant water status and irrigation timing. No difference in irrigation management was evident between vertisol and entisol. Under Mediterranean climate conditions, RDI was able to enhance grape yield and vegetative growth, especially in vertisol, but it reduced berry titratable acidity and total anthocyanins. ‘Nero d’Avola’ showed to adapt to drought conditions in the open field. Both soil type and irrigation regimes may provide opportunities to obtain different ‘Nero d’Avola’ wine quality and boost typicality. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Seasonal variation (DOY, day of the year) in predawn leaf water potential (PDWP) of ‘Nero d’Avola’ grapevines grown in two soils (entisol and vertisol) under rain-fed and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) treatments in 2005 (<b>A</b>) and 2006 (<b>B</b>). Bars show rainfall and irrigation events. Cumulative ET<sub>0</sub> is shown from pea size phenological stage (DOY 160) to ten days before harvest (DOY 245). In 2006, the irrigation started at the end of July (DOY 206). Error bars indicate standard errors (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 12). Dashed horizontal lines indicate the PDWP threshold values for irrigation. When present, different letters indicate significant differences among treatments for a specific date (Tukey’s multiple range test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Variation of soil water content (%) over the season in two soils (vertisol and entisol) (<b>A</b>) and irrigation treatments (regulated deficit irrigation (RDI), and rain-fed) (<b>B</b>). Error bars indicate standard errors (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 24); DOY, day of the year. When present, asterisks indicate significant differences between means (Tukey’s test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variation in stem water potential (SWP) of ‘Nero d’Avola’ grapevines grown in two soils (entisol and vertisol) under rain-fed and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) treatments in 2005 (<b>A</b>) and 2006 (<b>B</b>). In 2006, the irrigation started at the end of July (DOY 206). Error bars indicate standard errors (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 12). When present, different letters indicate significant differences among treatments for a specific date (Tukey’s multiple range test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationships between stomatal conductance (g<sub>s</sub>) and predawn leaf water potential (PDWP) of ‘Nero d’Avola’ vines grown in two soils (entisol and vertisol) under rain-fed conditions in 2005 (<b>A</b>) and 2006 (<b>B</b>), and under regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) in 2005 (<b>C</b>) and 2006 (<b>D</b>). Each point is the mean of four measurements. Data from the two soil types were similar (<span class="html-italic">t</span>-test of coefficients, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) and pooled together for each year and irrigation treatment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationships between stem water potential (SWP) and stomatal conductance (g<sub>s</sub>) of ‘Nero d’Avola’ vines grown in two soils (entisol and vertisol) under rain-fed conditions in 2005 (<b>A</b>) and 2006 (<b>B</b>), and under regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) in 2005 (<b>C</b>) and 2006 (<b>D</b>). Each point is the mean of four measurements. Data from the two soil types were similar (<span class="html-italic">t</span>-test of coefficients, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) and pooled together for each year and irrigation treatment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Difference in total leaf area from pea size to harvest (average of two years) for ‘Nero d’Avola’ vines grown in two soils (entisol and vertisol) and under rain-fed and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) treatments.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 694 KiB  
Article
Modelling Soluble Solids Content Accumulation in ‘Braeburn’ Apples
by Konni Biegert, Daniel Stöckeler, Roy J. McCormick and Peter Braun
Plants 2021, 10(2), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020302 - 5 Feb 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3161
Abstract
Optical sensor data can be used to determine changes in anthocyanins, chlorophyll and soluble solids content (SSC) in apple production. In this study, visible and near-infrared spectra (729 to 975 nm) were transformed to SSC values by advanced multivariate calibration models i.e., partial [...] Read more.
Optical sensor data can be used to determine changes in anthocyanins, chlorophyll and soluble solids content (SSC) in apple production. In this study, visible and near-infrared spectra (729 to 975 nm) were transformed to SSC values by advanced multivariate calibration models i.e., partial least square regression (PLSR) in order to test the substitution of destructive chemical analyses through non-destructive optical measurements. Spectral field scans were carried out from 2016 to 2018 on marked ‘Braeburn’ apples in Southwest Germany. The study combines an in-depth statistical analyses of longitudinal SSC values with horticultural knowledge to set guidelines for further applied use of SSC predictions in the orchard to gain insights into apple carbohydrate physiology. The PLSR models were investigated with respect to sample size, seasonal variation, laboratory errors and the explanatory power of PLSR models when applied to independent samples. As a result of Monte Carlo simulations, PLSR modelled SSC only depended to a minor extent on the absolute number and accuracy of the wet chemistry laboratory calibration measurements. The comparison between non-destructive SSC determinations in the orchard with standard destructive lab testing at harvest on an independent sample showed mean differences of 0.5% SSC over all study years. SSC modelling with longitudinal linear mixed-effect models linked high crop loads to lower SSC values at harvest and higher SSC values for fruit from the top part of a tree. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Soluble solids content (SSC) accumulation derived from the yearly calibrated (<a href="#sec2dot1dot1-plants-10-00302" class="html-sec">Section 2.1.1</a>) partial least squares regression models (<b>a</b>) and fruit diameter growth (<b>b</b>) for the three study years and all treatments are shown. Mean values per measurement day are plotted as solid line, single values as grey dots and +/−standard deviations as black vertical bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Regressions between laboratory measured and modelled % SSC. The calibration model was trained on 2016–2018 data. This model was thereafter evaluated with an independent validation data set for all years together and separately. Regression lines are plotted for each validation data set and adjusted prediction <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi>R</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </semantics></math> is displayed.Diagnostic plots</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) in % soluble solids content (SSC) based on 2016, 2017 and 2018 partial least squares regression (PLSR) models to test the effect of reduced calibration sample sets. For each setting, 500 Monte Carlo simulation runs were performed. Mean and standard deviation for each point are shown and 500 observations in each calibration data set and 100 observations in each validation data set used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) in % soluble solids content (SSC) based on 2016, 2017 and 2018 partial least squares regression (PLSR) models to test for nonsystematic laboratory errors during wet chemistry analyses. For each setting, 500 Monte Carlo simulation runs were performed. Mean and standard deviation for each point are shown and 500 observations in each calibration data set and 100 observations in each validation data set used.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3634 KiB  
Article
Detecting Mild Water Stress in Olive with Multiple Plant-Based Continuous Sensors
by Giulia Marino, Alessio Scalisi, Paula Guzmán-Delgado, Tiziano Caruso, Francesco Paolo Marra and Riccardo Lo Bianco
Plants 2021, 10(1), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010131 - 11 Jan 2021
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 3995
Abstract
A comprehensive characterization of water stress is needed for the development of automated irrigation protocols aiming to increase olive orchard environmental and economical sustainability. The main aim of this study is to determine whether a combination of continuous leaf turgor, fruit growth, and [...] Read more.
A comprehensive characterization of water stress is needed for the development of automated irrigation protocols aiming to increase olive orchard environmental and economical sustainability. The main aim of this study is to determine whether a combination of continuous leaf turgor, fruit growth, and sap flow responses improves the detection of mild water stress in two olive cultivars characterized by different responses to water stress. The sensitivity of the tested indicators to mild stress depended on the main mechanisms that each cultivar uses to cope with water deficit. One cultivar showed pronounced day to day changes in leaf turgor and fruit relative growth rate in response to water withholding. The other cultivar reduced daily sap flows and showed a pronounced tendency to reach very low values of leaf turgor. Based on these responses, the sensitivity of the selected indicators is discussed in relation to drought response mechanisms, such as stomatal closure, osmotic adjustment, and tissue elasticity. The analysis of the daily dynamics of the monitored parameters highlights the limitation of using non-continuous measurements in drought stress studies, suggesting that the time of the day when data is collected has a great influence on the results and consequent interpretations, particularly when different genotypes are compared. Overall, the results highlight the need to tailor plant-based water management protocols on genotype-specific physiological responses to water deficit and encourage the use of combinations of plant-based continuously monitoring sensors to establish a solid base for irrigation management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Example of the stress phases based on the inversion of the leaf patch clamp probe (LPCP) output pressure (<span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p</sub>) reading, with the green area showing the phase 1 or no stress (no inversion of the <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p</sub> curve, <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p</sub> equal to the inverse of turgor pressure); the yellow area indicating phase 2 or stress onset (half-inversion of the <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p</sub> curves or semi-inversion) and the red area showing phase 3 or high stress (full inversion of the <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p</sub> curve). Dark blue vertical lines indicate midnight and light blue dashed vertical lines indicate midday.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Seasonal trend of vapor pressure deficit (VPD, hourly mean) and total daily rain (from hourly values) from 1 August to 26 September 2015, obtained from data of the meteorological station in Sciacca, Sicily, Italy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Weekly midday stem water potential (Ψ<sub>stem</sub>) measured for the olive cultivars Olivo di Mandanici (OM) and Nocellara del Belice (NB). Vertical black bars represent standard errors of the mean (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 9); asterisks indicate significant differences between means (Tukey’s test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time course of the hourly standardized leaf patch clamp pressure (LPCP) probe output pressure (<span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p</sub>) for the olive cultivars Olivo di Mandanici (<b>a</b>) and Nocellara del Belice (<b>b</b>). Green, yellow and red dots represent daily stress phases based on exploratory data analysis of the diurnal shape of the LPCP probe outputs: phase 1 or no stress (no inversion of the <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p</sub> curve); phase 2 or stress onset (half-inversion of the Pp curves), and phase 3 or high stress (full inversion of the <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p</sub> curve). The horizontal dotted lines are the z-score of −1 and +1, representing the thresholds within which 68.27% of the results fall. Red arrows highlight the variability of the <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p</sub> values between irrigation events discussed in the text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Time course of the hourly fruit relative growth rate (RGR) for the olive cultivars Olivo di Mandanici (<b>a</b>) and Nocellara del Belice (<b>b</b>). Red arrows indicate the trends of RGR peaks between consecutive irrigation events discussed in the text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Time course of the hourly sap flow rate (<span class="html-italic">Q</span>) for the olive cultivars Olivo di Mandanici (<b>a</b>) and Nocellara del Belice (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Relationships between midday stem water potential (Ψ<sub>stem</sub>) and the daily minimum leaf patch clamp pressure (LPCP) probe outputs value (<span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p-min</sub>, z-scores, panel <b>a</b>), difference between daily minimum and maximum relative growth rate (RGR<sub>range</sub>, panel <b>b</b>), and the daily average of hourly sap flow rate (<span class="html-italic">Q</span><sub>ave</sub>, panel <b>c</b>) in the olive cultivars Olivo di Mandanici (OM, solid lines) and Nocellara del Belice (NB, dashed line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Hourly trends of (<b>a</b>) sap flow rate (<span class="html-italic">Q</span>), (<b>b</b>) standardized leaf patch clamp probe outputs (1 − <span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>p</sub>) and (<b>c</b>) fruit relative growth rate (RGR) for the olive cultivars Nocellara del Belice (NB) and Olivo di Mandanici (OM) between two consecutive irrigation events, from 15 to 21 August. T1, T2 T3, and T4 represent key timeframes described in the text.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4492 KiB  
Article
Red and Blue Netting Alters Leaf Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Apple Trees
by Richard M. Bastías, Pasquale Losciale, Camilla Chieco and Luca Corelli-Grappadelli
Plants 2021, 10(1), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010127 - 9 Jan 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3502
Abstract
There is little information about the role of red and blue light on leaf morphology and physiology in fruit trees, and more studies have been developed in herbaceous plants grown under controlled light conditions. The objective of this research was to evaluate the [...] Read more.
There is little information about the role of red and blue light on leaf morphology and physiology in fruit trees, and more studies have been developed in herbaceous plants grown under controlled light conditions. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of red and blue screens on morpho-anatomy and gas exchange in apple leaves grown under ambient sunlight conditions. Apple trees cv. Fuji were covered by 40% red and blue nets, leaving trees with 20% white net as control. Light relations (photosynthetic photon flux density, PPFD; red to far-red light ratio, R/FR and blue to red light ratio, B/R), morpho-anatomical features of the leaf (palisade to spongy mesophyll ratio, P/S, and stomata density, SD) and leaf gas exchange (net photosynthesis rate, An; stomatal conductance, gs; transpiration rate, E; and intrinsic water use efficiency, IWUE) were evaluated. Red and blue nets reduced 27% PPFD, reducing by 20% SD and 25% P/S compared to control, but without negative effects on An and gs. Blue net increased gs 21%, leading to the highest E and lowest IWUE by increment of B/R light proportion. These findings demonstrate the potential use of red and blue nets for differential modulation of apple leaf gas exchange through sunlight management under field conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) The influence of red and blue netting on total photosynthetic photon flux density, PPFD, (<b>B</b>) red to far-red light ratio, R/FR, (<b>C</b>) phytochrome photoequilibrium, Ф<sub>c</sub>, (<b>D</b>) blue to red light ratio, B/R under solar ambient conditions; 2 h BSN: Two hours before of solar noon; SN: solar noon; 2 h ASN: Two hours after solar noon. Columns with different letters are statistically significant by the LSD Fischer test; <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spectral irradiance pattern measured in apple trees grown under blue, red and white control nets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Scanning electron micrograph of stomata characteristics in apple leaves under white (control), (<b>b</b>) red and (<b>c</b>) blue colored nets. Magnification 503×. White Bars = 100 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Leaf cross-section of ‘Fuji’ mature apple leaves grown under white (control), (<b>b</b>) red and (<b>c</b>) blue nets. Magnification 40×. Bars = 100 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Daily course of photosynthetic photon flux density, PPFD, (<b>B</b>) stomatal conductance, <span class="html-italic">g</span><sub>s</sub>, (<b>C</b>) photosynthesis rate, A<sub>n</sub> and transpiration rate, E (<b>D</b>) in ‘Fuji’ apple leaves grown under red (□), blue (■) and white control (○) nets. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 12 leaves measured under ambient light conditions on two summer days. *; **: significant and highly significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Daily course of intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, C<sub>i</sub>; (<b>B</b>); instantaneous carboxylation efficiency, A<sub>n</sub>/C<sub>i</sub>; (<b>C</b>) water use efficiency, WUE; and intrinsic water use efficiency, IWUE (<b>D</b>) in ‘Fuji’ apple leaves grown under red (□), blue (■) and white control (○) nets. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 12 leaves measured under ambient light conditions on two summer days. *: Significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Daily course of leaf water potential in ‘Fuji’ apple potted trees grown under blue (■), red (□), and white control (○) nets. Each value represents the mean ± standard error (SE) of 5–10 leaves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The response of photosynthesis rate (An) to stomatal conductance (<span class="html-italic">g</span><sub>s</sub>) variations in ‘Fuji’ apple leaves grown in red (□), blue (■) and white control (○) nets measured under ambient light conditions before solar noon (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) and after solar noon (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>), respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Detail of ‘Fuji’ apple trees grown under white control, (<b>b</b>) red and (<b>c</b>) blue colored nets.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 7091 KiB  
Article
Russeting in Apple is Initiated after Exposure to Moisture Ends: Molecular and Biochemical Evidence
by Jannis Straube, Yun-Hao Chen, Bishnu P. Khanal, Alain Shumbusho, Viktoria Zeisler-Diehl, Kiran Suresh, Lukas Schreiber, Moritz Knoche and Thomas Debener
Plants 2021, 10(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010065 - 30 Dec 2020
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 4483
Abstract
Exposure of the fruit surface to moisture during early development is causal in russeting of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Moisture exposure results in formation of microcracks and decreased cuticle thickness. Periderm differentiation begins in the hypodermis, but only after discontinuation of [...] Read more.
Exposure of the fruit surface to moisture during early development is causal in russeting of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Moisture exposure results in formation of microcracks and decreased cuticle thickness. Periderm differentiation begins in the hypodermis, but only after discontinuation of moisture exposure. Expressions of selected genes involved in cutin, wax and suberin synthesis were quantified, as were the wax, cutin and suberin compositions. Experiments were conducted in two phases. In Phase I (31 days after full bloom) the fruit surface was exposed to moisture for 6 or 12 d. Phase II was after moisture exposure had been discontinued. Unexposed areas on the same fruit served as unexposed controls. During Phase I, cutin and wax synthesis genes were down-regulated only in the moisture-exposed patches. During Phase II, suberin synthesis genes were up-regulated only in the moisture-exposed patches. The expressions of cutin and wax genes in the moisture-exposed patches increased slightly during Phase II, but the levels of expression were much lower than in the control patches. Amounts and compositions of cutin, wax and suberin were consistent with the gene expressions. Thus, moisture-induced russet is a two-step process: moisture exposure reduces cutin and wax synthesis, moisture removal triggers suberin synthesis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Time courses of expression of genes related to cutin and wax synthesis (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and to suberin and lignin synthesis (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) of apple fruit skin during (Phase I) of exposure to moisture and after exposure was discontinued (Phase II). During Phase I, a patch of the fruit skin was exposed to moisture for 6 d beginning at 31 days after full bloom (DAFB) (wet). During the subsequent Phase II, moisture was removed, and the patch was exposed to the atmosphere (dry). Moisture-exposed patches of the fruit skin are referred to as wet/dry, unexposed control patches as dry/dry. The end of moisture exposure is indicated by the vertical dashed line. The expression values are means ± SE of three independent biological replicates comprising ten fruit each. The ‘*’ indicates significant differences between dry/dry and wet/dry at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Time courses of expression of genes related to cutin and wax synthesis (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and to suberin and lignin synthesis (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) of apple fruit skin during (Phase I) of exposure to moisture and after exposure to moisture was discontinued (Phase II). During Phase I, a patch of the fruit skin was exposed to moisture for 12 d beginning at 31 days after full bloom (DAFB) (wet). During the subsequent Phase II, moisture was removed, and the patch was exposed to the atmosphere (dry). Moisture-exposed patches of the fruit skin are referred to as wet/dry, unexposed control patches as dry/dry. The end of moisture exposure is indicated by the vertical dashed line. The expression values are means ± SE of three independent biological replicates comprising ten fruit each. The ‘*’ indicates significant differences between dry/dry and wet/dry at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Time course of expression of genes related to cutin and wax synthesis (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and to suberin and lignin synthesis (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) of apple fruit skin during moisture exposure (Phase I) and after exposure to moisture was discontinued (Phase II). During Phase I, a patch of the fruit skin was exposed to moisture for 12 d beginning at 66 days after full bloom (DAFB) (wet). During the subsequent Phase II, moisture was removed, and the patch was exposed to the atmosphere (dry). Moisture-exposed patches of the fruit skin are referred to as wet/dry, unexposed control patches as dry/dry. The end of moisture exposure is indicated by the vertical dashed line. The expression values are means ± SE of three to five independent biological replicates comprising ten fruit each. The ‘*’ indicates significant differences between dry/dry and wet/dry at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time course of expression of genes related to cutin and wax synthesis (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and to suberin and lignin synthesis (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) of apple fruit skin during exposure to moisture (Phase I) and after exposure to moisture was discontinued (Phase II). During Phase I, a patch of the fruit skin was exposed to moisture for 12 d beginning at 93 days after full bloom (DAFB) (wet). During the subsequent Phase II, moisture was removed, and the patch was exposed to the atmosphere (dry). Moisture exposed patches of fruit skin are referred to as wet/dry, unexposed control patches as dry/dry. The end of the moisture exposure is indicated by the vertical dashed line. The expression values are means ± SE of three independent biological replicates comprising ten fruit each. The ‘*’ indicates significant differences between dry/dry and wet/dry at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Macroscopic view of unexposed control patches (<b>a</b>,<b>g</b>) and moisture exposed (<b>b</b>,<b>h</b>) skin patches of apple fruit. Cross-sections of epidermal skin samples (ES) of control patches (<b>c</b>,<b>i</b>) and of the composite skins of moisture-exposed patches comprising epidermal plus peridermal sections (ES+PS) (<b>d</b>) or peridermal section only (PS) (<b>j</b>). Cross-sections of isolated cuticular membranes (CM) (<b>e</b>,<b>k</b>) and cuticular plus periderm membranes (CM+PM) (<b>f</b>) or periderm membranes only (PM) (<b>l</b>). The moisture treatment was applied as a two-phase experiment. During Phase I, a patch of the fruit skin was exposed to moisture for 12 d beginning at 31 days after full bloom (DAFB) (wet). During the subsequent Phase II moisture was removed, and the patch was exposed to the atmosphere (dry) (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>j</b>,<b>l</b>). A portion of the unexposed surface on the same fruit served as control (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>k</b>). Micrographs were taken 8 d (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) and 113 d (<b>g</b>–<b>l</b>) after moisture exposure was discontinued. Images in (<b>c</b>–<b>f</b>) and (<b>i</b>–<b>l</b>) were taken under incident fluorescent light (U-MWB) after staining with Fluorol Yellow 088. The scale bar in (<b>a</b>) equals 10 mm and is representative for all surface views (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>). The scale bar in (<b>c</b>) equals 50 µm and is representative for all cross-sections of the composite (<b>c</b>–<b>f</b>, <b>i</b>–<b>l</b>). The dotted circles in (<b>b</b>) and (<b>h</b>) mark the original footprint of the tube that was mounted on the fruit surface to enable moisture exposure, the dotted circles in (<b>a</b>) and (<b>g</b>) are unexposed control patches on the same fruit. For details of the moisture treatment, see Materials and Methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cutin and suberin monomers in patches of apple fruit skin that were exposed to moisture for 6 d (<b>a</b>) and 12 d (<b>b</b>) (Phase I, wet). During the subsequent Phase II, the moisture exposure was discontinued (dry) and the cutin and suberin compositions of the patches analyzed after 8 d (<b>c</b>) and 113 d (<b>d</b>) after moisture exposure was discontinued. Unexposed patches of the fruit skin that remained dry throughout, served as controls (dry/dry). Data represent means ± SE of two to three replicates comprising cuticles of five fruit each. Significance of differences between dry/dry and wet/dry at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 are indicated by ‘*’ (Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Composition of the periderm of the bark of the trunk (BP) of a ‘Pinova’ apple tree. (<b>a</b>) Constituents of the suberin and (<b>b</b>) constituents of the wax. The BP represents a pure periderm without any remnants of a cuticle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Wax constituents in patches of apple fruit skin that had been exposed to moisture for 6 d (<b>a</b>) and for 12 d (<b>b</b>) (Phase I, wet). During the subsequent Phase II, the moisture exposure was discontinued (dry) and the cutin and suberin compositions of the patches analyzed after 8 d (<b>c</b>) and 113 d (<b>d</b>). Unexposed patches of the fruit skin served as controls (dry/dry). Data represent means ± SE of two or three replicates comprising cuticles of five fruit each. Significance of differences between dry/dry and wet/dry at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 is indicated by ‘*’ (Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Total mass of cutin (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), wax (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) and suberin (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) in patches of the apple fruit skin during exposure to moisture (Phase I) and after exposure to moisture had been discontinued (Phase II). During Phase I, a patch of the skin was exposed to moisture for 6 d (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>) or 12 d (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>) beginning at 31 days after full bloom (DAFB) (wet). During the subsequent Phase II, the exposure to moisture was discontinued and the patch exposed to the atmosphere (dry). Moisture exposed patches of fruit skin are referred to as wet/dry, unexposed control patches as dry/dry. The end of the moisture exposure period is indicated by the vertical dashed line. The data represent the means ± SE of two or three samples comprising five fruits each. Significance of differences between dry/dry and wet/dry at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 is indicated by ‘*’ (Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Schematic of the process of russeting at the phenotypic, transcriptional and metabolic level during exposure of apple fruit skin patches to moisture (Phase I) and following discontinuation of exposure (Phase II).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 1581 KiB  
Article
Gibberellic Acid Modifies the Transcript Abundance of ABA Pathway Orthologs and Modulates Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium) Fruit Ripening in Early- and Mid-Season Varieties
by Nathalie Kuhn, Claudio Ponce, Macarena Arellano, Alson Time, Boris Sagredo, José Manuel Donoso and Lee A. Meisel
Plants 2020, 9(12), 1796; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121796 - 18 Dec 2020
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 3764
Abstract
Several phytohormones modulate ripening in non-climacteric fruits, which is triggered by abscisic acid (ABA). Gibberellins (GAs) are present during the onset of ripening in sweet cherry fruits, and exogenous gibberellic acid (GA3) application delays ripening, though this effect is variety-dependent. Although [...] Read more.
Several phytohormones modulate ripening in non-climacteric fruits, which is triggered by abscisic acid (ABA). Gibberellins (GAs) are present during the onset of ripening in sweet cherry fruits, and exogenous gibberellic acid (GA3) application delays ripening, though this effect is variety-dependent. Although an ABA accumulation delay has been reported following GA3 treatment, the mechanism by which GA modulates this process has not been investigated at the molecular level in sweet cherry. Therefore, the aim of this work is to analyze the effect of GA3 on the fruit ripening process and the transcript levels of ABA pathway orthologs in two varieties having different maturity time phenotypes. The early-season variety had a rapid transition from yellow to pink fruit color, whereas pink color initiation took longer in the mid-season variety. GA3 increased the proportion of lighter colored fruits at ripeness in both varieties, but it produced a delay in IAD—a ripening index—only in the mid-season variety. This delay was accompanied by an increased transcript abundance of PavPP2Cs, which are putative negative regulators of the ABA pathway. On the other hand, the early-season variety had increased expression of PavCYP707A2—a putative ABA catabolic gene–, and reduced transcript levels of PavPP2Cs and SnRK2s after the GA3 treatment. Together these results show that GA modulates fruit ripening, exerting its action in part by interacting with the ABA pathway in sweet cherry. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Fruit growth and growth rate curves of early-season variety, Glenred (<b>A</b>) and mid-season variety, Lapins (<b>B</b>). A color scale is included based on fruit phenology (<a href="#app1-plants-09-01796" class="html-app">Tables S1 and S2</a>). Growth resumption prior to fruit color change is indicated with a dotted blue line, 20 fruits from Lapins and Glenred were randomly selected for measurements. Data as ± SEM. DAFB, days after full bloom.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effect of exogenous gibberellic acid (GA<sub>3</sub>) on fruit growth of early-season variety, Glenred (<b>A</b>) and mid-season variety, Lapins (<b>B</b>) 20 fruits from control and GA<sub>3</sub> trees of Lapins and Glenred were randomly selected for measurements. Data as ± SEM ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 was conducted; “*” denotes statistical differences between GA<sub>3</sub>-treated and control fruits. DAFB, days after full bloom.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of GA<sub>3</sub> on color distribution and index of absorbance difference (IAD) at harvest of early-season variety, Glenred (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and mid-season variety, Lapins (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>). 20 fruits from control and GA<sub>3</sub> trees of Lapins and Glenred were randomly selected for nondestructive IAD measurements in the field and 25 fruits for color distribution assessment at harvest. Data as ± SEM ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 was conducted; “*” denotes statistical differences between GA<sub>3</sub>-treated and control fruits CTIFL (Centre Technique Interprofessionnel des Fruits et Légumes) color chart was used in (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>), where 1 is the lightest color, and 4 is the darkest color, respectively (<a href="#app1-plants-09-01796" class="html-app">Figure S3</a>). DAFB, days after full bloom.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effect of GA<sub>3</sub> on transcript abundance relative to <span class="html-italic">PavCAC</span> of <span class="html-italic">PavNCED1</span> and <span class="html-italic">PavCYP707A2</span> sweet cherry orthologs, 5 days after the treatment (T5). Fruits from control and GA<sub>3</sub> trees of (<b>A</b>) early-season variety Glenred and (<b>B</b>) mid-season variety Lapins, were randomly selected and pooled for the RT–qPCR analyses. Data as +SEM. Relative transcript abundance was set to 1.0 at T0, where T0 is the sampling performed immediately before GA<sub>3</sub> application ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 was conducted; “*” denotes statistical differences between GA<sub>3</sub>-treated and control fruits for a gene.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of GA<sub>3</sub> on transcript abundance relative to <span class="html-italic">PavCAC</span> of <span class="html-italic">PavPP2C</span> and <span class="html-italic">PavSnRK2</span> sweet cherry orthologs, 5 days after the treatment (T5). Fruits from control and GA<sub>3</sub> trees of (<b>A</b>) early-season variety Glenred and (<b>B</b>) mid-season variety Lapins were randomly selected and pooled for the RT–qPCR analyses. Data as +SEM. Relative transcript abundance was set to 1.0 at T0, where T0 is the sampling performed immediately before GA<sub>3</sub> application ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 was conducted; “*” denotes statistical differences between GA<sub>3</sub>-treated and control fruits for a gene.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2109 KiB  
Article
Correction of Potassium Fertigation Rate of Apple Tree (Malus domestica Borkh.) in Central Russia during the Growing Season
by Andrei I. Kuzin, Natalia Ya. Kashirskaya, Anna M. Kochkina and Alexey V. Kushner
Plants 2020, 9(10), 1366; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101366 - 15 Oct 2020
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 3694
Abstract
The proper use of potassium fertilizer can stimulate a significant yield increase. However, the application of excessively high rates of potassium can reduce the availability of soil calcium for apple trees. The potassium fertigation rate must meet the apple tree’s requirements so that [...] Read more.
The proper use of potassium fertilizer can stimulate a significant yield increase. However, the application of excessively high rates of potassium can reduce the availability of soil calcium for apple trees. The potassium fertigation rate must meet the apple tree’s requirements so that the applied fertilizers can be absorbed by the roots as much as possible. Crop load in apple orchards sometimes varies significantly in different years. The potassium content in apple fruits is relatively high, and the maximum requirement for this nutrient occurs when fruits grow and ripen. Different crop loads at that time mean the various demands of trees and need for changing application rates for this nutrient. The investigation was carried out in the experimental orchard of I.V. Michurin Federal Scientific Centre (Michurinsk, Russia) in 2016 and 2017 (52.885131, 40.465613). We studied seasonal changes of potassium and calcium contents in soil, fruits, and leaves and their relationship with yield during the research. We paid much attention to the potassium rate shift on its content in leaves and fruits and cultivars “Lobo” and “Zhigulevskoye” yield. If the potassium application rate changes according to the actual crop load, it stimulates the yield growth or (if the crop load was relatively low) the reduction of the rate did not lower the productivity. Moreover, we studied the relationship between potassium and calcium nutrition. The decrease in potassium fertigation rate increased the availability of soil calcium. It was the reason for fruit calcium concentration enlargement and mitigation of the K/Ca ratio. We also specified some parameters for soil–leaf diagnosis for potassium nutrition during the growing season. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Seasonal changes of the soil exchangeable potassium content, cv. “Zhigulevskoye” plots: (<b>a</b>) 2016 and (<b>b</b>) 2017 (only G1 unchangeable K rates).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Seasonal changes of the soil exchangeable potassium content, cv. “Lobo” plots: (<b>a</b>) 2016 and (<b>b</b>) 2017 (only G1 unchangeable K rates).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dynamic changes of correlation coefficients between the potassium leaf status and yield in growing season 2016: (<b>a</b>) cv. “Zhigulevskoye”; (<b>b</b>) cv. “Lobo”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Dynamic changes of correlation coefficients between the potassium leaf status and yield in growing season 2017: (<b>a</b>) cv. “Zhigulevskoye”; (<b>b</b>) cv. “Lobo”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Dynamic changes of correlation coefficients between the leaf calcium status and potassium fertigation rates during the growing season of 2016: (<b>a</b>) cv. “Zhigulevskoye”; (<b>b</b>) cv. “Lobo”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Dynamic changes of correlation coefficients between the leaf calcium status and potassium fertigation rates during the growing season of 2017. (<b>a</b>) cv. “Zhigulevskoye”; (<b>b</b>) cv. “Lobo”.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1670 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Environmental Features on the Morphometric Variation in Mauritia flexuosa L.f. Fruits and Seeds
by Nilo L. Sander, Carolina J. da Silva, Aline V. M. Duarte, Bruno W. Zago, Carla Galbiati, Iris G. Viana, Joari C. de Arruda, Juliana E. Dardengo, Juliana P. Poletine, Marcelo H. Siqueira Leite, Marta H. S. de Souza, Robson F. de Oliveira, Thallita S. Guimarães, Valvenarg P. da Silva and Marco A. A. Barelli
Plants 2020, 9(10), 1304; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101304 - 2 Oct 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2657
Abstract
The environmental heterogeneity may reflect the different morphological and phenotypic traits of individuals belonging to a single species. We used 14 morphological traits of Mauritia flexuosa L.f. to understanding the relation between environment and phenotypic traits. Twenty-five fruits were collected from each of [...] Read more.
The environmental heterogeneity may reflect the different morphological and phenotypic traits of individuals belonging to a single species. We used 14 morphological traits of Mauritia flexuosa L.f. to understanding the relation between environment and phenotypic traits. Twenty-five fruits were collected from each of the 10 individuals sampled in each study site: Chapada dos Guimarães (CG), Vila Bela da Santíssima Trindade (VB), and Alta Floresta (AF). We analyzed the genetic divergence, using the standardized Euclidean distance, the sequential method of Tocher, unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA), and the projection of the distances onto 2D plane, and calculated the relative importance of the traits evaluated. The analysis showed the partition of individuals into three main groups: Two groups comprising the majority of individuals. Fresh fruit weight, pulp rate, fresh pulp weight, and moisture rate were the traits that most helped explaining the difference between materials. The results shown in the current study evidenced the influence of these three different environments on the biometric traits of M. flexuosa. Such influence has led to the formation of Alta Floresta and Vila Bela da Santíssima Trindade individuals in different groups, whereas the Chapada dos Guimarães individuals were able to permeate the two other groups, although they showed stronger tendency to group with individuals from Vila Bela da Santíssima Trindade. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dendrogram representing the dissimilarity pattern among the 30 buriti (<span class="html-italic">M. flexuosa</span>) individuals obtained through the unweighted pair group method, the arithmetic mean (UPGMA) was based on the standardized Euclidean distance estimated from 14 quantitative traits of the buriti fruits and seeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Projection of distances in 2D by taking into consideration the 30 buriti (<span class="html-italic">M. flexuosa</span>) individuals, based on the standardized Euclidean distance estimated from 14 quantitative traits of buriti fruits and seeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatter plot of 30 buriti (<span class="html-italic">M. flexuosa</span>) individuals based on the two traits that showed the greatest relative dissimilarity (S.j′) contribution, analyzed according to Singh [<a href="#B10-plants-09-01304" class="html-bibr">10</a>] criteria.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Biomes in Mato Grosso State and the locations of the study sites in the respective counties. (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatıstica - IBGE).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 8504 KiB  
Article
Russeting in Apple Is Initiated After Exposure to Moisture Ends—I. Histological Evidence
by Yun-Hao Chen, Jannis Straube, Bishnu P. Khanal, Moritz Knoche and Thomas Debener
Plants 2020, 9(10), 1293; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101293 - 30 Sep 2020
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 3628
Abstract
Russeting (periderm formation) is a critical fruit-surface disorder in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). The first symptom of insipient russeting is cuticular microcracking. Humid and rainy weather increases russeting. The aim was to determine the ontogeny of moisture-induced russeting in ‘Pinova’ apple. [...] Read more.
Russeting (periderm formation) is a critical fruit-surface disorder in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). The first symptom of insipient russeting is cuticular microcracking. Humid and rainy weather increases russeting. The aim was to determine the ontogeny of moisture-induced russeting in ‘Pinova’ apple. We recorded the effects of duration of exposure to water and the stage of fruit development at exposure on microcracking, periderm formation and cuticle deposition. Early on (21 or 31 days after full bloom; DAFB) short periods (2 to 12 d) of moisture exposure induced cuticular microcracking—but not later on (66 or 93 DAFB). A periderm was not formed during moisture exposure but 4 d after exposure ended. A periderm was formed in the hypodermis beneath a microcrack. Russeting frequency and severity were low for up to 4 d of moisture exposure but increased after 6 d. Cuticle thickness was not affected by moisture for up to 8 d but decreased for longer exposures. Cuticular ridge thickness decreased around a microcrack. In general, moisture did not affect cuticular strain release. We conclude that a hypodermal periderm forms after termination of moisture exposure and after microcrack formation. Reduced cuticle deposition may cause moisture-induced microcracking and, thus, russeting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effects of mounting tubes on the fruit surface without and with added moisture for 12 d, on the formation of periderm 8 d after removal of the tubes. (<b>a</b>) control that had a tube without water mounted for 12 d. (<b>b</b>) control without tube. (<b>c</b>) moisture treatment that had a tube containing water mounted for 12 d. The experiment comprised two phases: Phase I consisted of mounting the tube without or with water and Phase II marks the period after termination of moisture treatment. Micrographs taken under transmitted white light (upper) or incident fluorescent light (lower) (filter module U-MWB) following staining with Fluorol Yellow 088. The scale bar in (<b>a</b>) is 50 µm long and representative of all images in the composite (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Time course of moisture-induced microcracking. Microcracking of the cuticle was indexed by quantifying the percentage of treated area infiltrated with acridine orange. The experiment comprised two phases: The first period of moisture exposure (Phase I) and the second period after termination of moisture exposure (Phase II). The end of Phase I and the beginning of Phase II is indicated by the dashed vertical line. The moisture treatment is referred to as ‘wet/dry’ and the control as ‘dry/dry.’ Data symbols present means ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 to 20).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of moisture exposure for 6 d (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>i</b>) or for 12 d (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>j</b>) on the time course of periderm development established at 0 d (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), 1 d (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), 2 d (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), 3 d (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) or 4 d (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>) after termination of moisture exposure. The experiment comprised two phases: Phase I of moisture exposure and Phase II after termination of moisture exposure. Micrographs taken under transmitted white light (upper) or incident fluorescent light (lower) (filter module U-MWB) following staining with Fluorol Yellow 088. The scale bar in (<b>a</b>) is 50 µm long and representative of all images in the composite (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effect of moisture exposure for 2 d (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), 4 d (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), 6 d (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), 8 d (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), 12 d (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>) or 16 d (<b>k</b>,<b>l</b>) on periderm formation. The experiment comprised two phases: Phase I—time of moisture exposure and Phase II—time after termination of moisture exposure. Phase I was recorded immediately after termination of moisture exposure (0 d) (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>k</b>). Phase II was recorded 4 d after termination of moisture exposure (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>j</b>,<b>l</b>). Micrographs taken under transmitted white light (upper) or incident fluorescent light (lower) (filter module U-MWB) after being stained with Fluorol Yellow 088. The scale bar in (<b>a</b>) is 50 μm long and representative of all images in the composite (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of duration of moisture exposure (Phase I) on the frequency of russeted fruit (<b>a</b>) and the percentage of the moisture-exposed area that is russeted at maturity (156 days after full bloom; DAFB) (<b>b</b>). Fruits were exposed to moisture starting from 31 DAFB for 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 or 16 d. Data represent means ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 9–31).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Macrographs (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and micrographs (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) of mature (156 days after full bloom; DAFB) ‘Pinova’ apple fruit following exposure to surface moisture for 12 d at 31 DAFB (wet). Fruit without moisture-exposure, served as controls (dry). Micrographs represent cross-sections of the fruit skin in the moisture-exposed region and the dry region. Micrographs were taken under transmitted white light (upper) or incident fluorescent light (lower) (filter module U-MWB) after being stained with Fluorol Yellow 088. The area enclosed by the dotted circle represents the footprint of the moisture-treated patch of skin that subsequently developed russet. Scale bar in (<b>a</b>) and (<b>b</b>) is 2 cm long and that in (<b>c</b>) and (<b>d</b>) is 50 μm long.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of a 12 d moisture exposure (wet; Phase I) on periderm development in the skin of apple fruit. Cross-sections were prepared 8 d after termination of moisture exposure (dry; Phase II). The fruit surface was exposed to moisture starting at 31 days after full bloom (DAFB) (<b>a</b>) or 66 DAFB (<b>b</b>) or 93 DAFB (<b>c</b>). Cross-sections were prepared from the moisture-treated surface of the fruit. Images were taken under transmitted white light (upper) or incident fluorescent light (lower) (filter module U-MWB) after being stained with Fluorol Yellow 088. The scale bar in (<b>a</b>) is 50 μm long and representative of all images in the composite (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effect of moisture exposure on the thickness of the cuticle above the anticlinal cell walls (ridge) (<b>a</b>) and above the periclinal cell walls (lamella) (<b>b</b>) of the apple fruit skin. In Phase I, the fruit was exposed to moisture for 12 d. Phase II began following termination of moisture exposure (indicated by the dotted vertical line) and the surface remained dry thereafter (wet/dry). Fruit surface without moisture exposure served as control (dry/dry). *** indicate significant difference between ‘dry/dry’ and ‘wet/dry’ treatment at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001. Data represent means ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Thickness of the cuticle above the anticlinal cell walls (ridge) as affected by the distance from a moisture induced microcrack. Microcracks were induced by 12 d of moisture exposure. Thickness was measured on cross-sections of the fruit skin prepared from fruit sampled on the day of termination of moisture exposure (0 d) (<b>a</b>) and 4 d (<b>b</b>) and 8 d (<b>c</b>) after moisture termination (during Phase II). The distance ‘0’ represents the center of the microcrack. Thickness was measured in both directions from the microcrack. The dashed line is the grand mean thickness of all cuticle ridges within the micrograph. The arrows indicate the mean width of the microcrack. Data represent means ± SE of 14 to 19 microcracks on a total of six fruits.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effect of 12 d of moisture exposure (Phase I) on the elastic strain of the cuticular membrane (CM). Strain was quantified as the strain release during excision and isolation of the CM (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <b>a</b>) and following wax extraction of the CM (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <b>b</b>) and the sum of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>i</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> plus <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>; <b>c</b>). Phase I represents the period of moisture exposure (wet). Phase II represents the period after moisture termination (dry). The dotted line indicates the end of Phase I and the beginning of Phase II. * indicates a significant difference between dry/dry and wet/dry treatment at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. Data represent means ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 8 to 20).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2665 KiB  
Article
Gaining Insight into Exclusive and Common Transcriptomic Features Linked to Drought and Salinity Responses across Fruit Tree Crops
by Jubina Benny, Annalisa Marchese, Antonio Giovino, Francesco Paolo Marra, Anna Perrone, Tiziano Caruso and Federico Martinelli
Plants 2020, 9(9), 1059; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091059 - 19 Aug 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3585
Abstract
The present study aimed at identifying and mapping key genes expressed in root tissues involved in drought and salinity tolerance/resistance conserved among different fruit tree species. Twenty-six RNA-Seq samples were analyzed from six published studies in five plant species (Olea europaea, Vitis [...] Read more.
The present study aimed at identifying and mapping key genes expressed in root tissues involved in drought and salinity tolerance/resistance conserved among different fruit tree species. Twenty-six RNA-Seq samples were analyzed from six published studies in five plant species (Olea europaea, Vitis riparia Michx, Prunus mahaleb, Prunus persica, Phoenix dactylifera). This meta-analysis used a bioinformatic pipeline identifying 750 genes that were commonly modulated in three salinity studies and 683 genes that were commonly regulated among three drought studies, implying their conserved role in resistance/tolerance/response to these environmental stresses. A comparison was done on the genes that were in common among both salinity and drought resulted in 82 genes, of which 39 were commonly regulated with the same trend of expression (23 were upregulated and 16 were downregulated). Gene set enrichment and pathway analysis pointed out that pathways encoding regulation of defense response, drug transmembrane transport, and metal ion binding are general key molecular responses to these two abiotic stress responses. Furthermore, hormonal molecular crosstalk plays an essential role in the fine-tuning of plant responses to drought and salinity. Drought and salinity induced a different molecular “hormonal fingerprint”. Dehydration stress specifically enhanced multiple genes responsive to abscisic acid, gibberellin, brassinosteroids, and the ethylene-activated signaling pathway. Salt stress mostly repressed genes encoding for key enzymes in signaling proteins in auxin-, gibberellin-(gibberellin 2 oxidase 8), and abscisic acid-related pathways (aldehyde oxidase 4, abscisic acid-responsive element-binding protein 3). Abiotic stress-related genes were mapped into the chromosome to identify molecular markers usable for the improvement of these complex quantitative traits. This meta-analysis identified genes that serve as potential targets to develop cultivars with enhanced drought and salinity resistance and/or tolerance across different fruit tree crops in a biotechnological sustainable way. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Drought- and salinity-regulated genes involved in hormone-related categories commonly regulated in the studies are shown. Genes were identified as <span class="html-italic">Arabidopsis</span> orthologs of each gene of the analyzed plant species. Red and green indicate the up- and down-regulated genes in drought, whereas blue and yellow indicate the up- and down-regulated genes in salinity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Drought/salinity-regulated genes involved in abiotic stress-related categories commonly regulated in all eight studies are indicated. Genes were identified as <span class="html-italic">Arabidopsis thaliana</span> orthologs of each gene of the analyzed plant species. Red indicates up-regulation and green indicates down-regulation in response to drought stress, whereas blue and yellow indicate up- and down-regulated genes in salinity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Protein–protein interaction network analysis predicted for genes commonly regulated in (<b>a</b>) three of three drought studies, and (<b>b</b>) three of three salinity studies; (<b>c</b>) genes commonly regulated in six of six studies of both drought and salinity based on <span class="html-italic">Arabidopsis</span> knowledgebase. Proteins encoded by genes having a high degree of betweenness are shown in red (up-regulated) and green (down-regulated).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Main gene regulatory networks in common between responses to drought and salinity. Key genes involved in hormonal signaling, transduction signal, transcription regulation, and defense responses identified by the meta-analysis are indicated together with physiological effects. Upregulated genes are shown in red, while downregulated genes are shown in green.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Workflow of the meta-analysis of the six transcriptomic studies related to drought and salinity stress in root tissue. Functional and statistical data analysis are indicated.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3303 KiB  
Article
Russeting in ‘Apple’ Mango: Triggers and Mechanisms
by Thomas O. Athoo, Andreas Winkler and Moritz Knoche
Plants 2020, 9(7), 898; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9070898 - 16 Jul 2020
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 10680
Abstract
Russeting is an important surface disorder of many fruitcrop species. The mango cultivar ‘Apple’ is especially susceptible to russeting. Russeting compromises both fruit appearance and postharvest performance. The objective was to identify factors, mechanisms, and consequences of russeting in ‘Apple’ mango. Russeting was [...] Read more.
Russeting is an important surface disorder of many fruitcrop species. The mango cultivar ‘Apple’ is especially susceptible to russeting. Russeting compromises both fruit appearance and postharvest performance. The objective was to identify factors, mechanisms, and consequences of russeting in ‘Apple’ mango. Russeting was quantified on excised peels using image analysis and a categorical rating scheme. Water vapour loss was determined gravimetrically. The percentage of the skin area exhibiting russet increased during development. Russet began at lenticels then spread across the surface, ultimately forming a network of rough, brown patches over the skin. Cross-sections revealed stacks of phellem cells, typical of a periderm. Russet was more severe on the dorsal surface of the fruit than on the ventral and more for fruit in the upper part of the canopy than in the lower. Russet differed markedly across orchards sites of different climates. Russet was positively correlated with altitude, the number of rainy days, and the number of cold nights but negatively correlated with minimum, maximum, and mean daily temperatures, dew point temperature, and heat sum. Russeted fruit had higher transpiration rates than non-russeted fruits and higher skin permeance to water vapour. Russet in ‘Apple’ mango is due to periderm formation that is initiated at lenticels. Growing conditions conducive for surface wetness exacerbate russeting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Macroscope view of mature ‘Apple’ mango without (<b>a, score 0</b>), moderate (<b>b, score 2</b>), and extreme (<b>c, score 4</b>) russet symptoms. (<b>d</b>): Plot of russeting (rating score) against percentage area affected by russet (image analysis). Each fruit was rated visually prior to image analysis. The number of observations was 18.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Change in fruit surface area (cm<sup>2</sup>) and rate of surface expansion (<b>a</b> and <b>a inset</b>) with time (days after full bloom, DAFB). Percent of skin with russet in developing fruit (<b>b</b>) calculated from a defined area of the fruit cheek. The same fruit was photographed at 100, 156, and 216 DAFB (see arrows). Pictorial representation of russet progression in a developing ‘Apple’ mango fruit (<b>c1</b>–<b>c3</b>). Scale bar is 10 mm. Data represent means ± SE of 19 replicates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Microscopic view of ‘Apple’ mango skin infiltrated with acridine orange dye when viewed with a binocular microscope under natural (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>k</b>,<b>m</b>) or fluorescent light (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>j</b>,<b>l</b>,<b>n</b>). The scale bars refer to the corresponding pairs of images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cross-sectional microscope images of a non-russeted (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and russeted (<b>c</b>–<b>j</b>) skin of ‘Apple’ mango viewed under incident white (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>i</b>) or fluorescent light (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>j</b>) following staining with fluorol yellow dye. Scale bar is 50 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationship between climatic variables and average russeting (rating score) determined for the cumulative period of fruit maturity at ten locations in Kenya. The ten locations were: Garissa (1), Chepsigot (2), Malindi (3), Mumbuni (4), Yeemulwa (5), Kaiti (6), Kasafari (7), Kambirwa (8), Thika (9), and Machakos (10) situated at different altitudes. (<b>a</b>) The climatic variables include: rainfall amount (<b>b</b>), days with rainfall (<b>c</b>), relative humidity (<b>d</b>), minimum, maximum, and mean daily temperatures (<b>e</b>, <b>f</b>, and <b>g</b>, respectively). Cold nights (<b>h</b>) correspond to the number of days when the minimum temperature fell below the base temperature of 16 °C. Heat sum (<b>i</b>) was calculated based on a base temperature of 16 °C. Russeting was quantified using a five-score rating scheme: score 0: 0% of the fruit surface area russeted; score 1: 1–10% russeted area; score 2: 11–25% russeted area; score 3: 26–50% russeted area; and score 4: 51–100% russeted area. Data points represent means of 210 fruit per site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Time course of transpiration by whole fruits with extreme (&gt;50%) (russeted) and with minimal (&lt;25%) russet (not russeted) (<b>a</b>) and through epidermal sections (ES) excised from the cheek of mature ‘Apple’ mango fruit with and without russeting (<b>b</b>). Permeance of water vapour diffusion through the ES (<b>b inset</b>) was calculated under conditions of steady state water loss. Data represent means ± SE of a minimum of 10 replicates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Photograph of ‘Apple’ mango and sketch illustrating the nomenclature used to describe regions of the fruit surface [<a href="#B41-plants-09-00898" class="html-bibr">41</a>].</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 910 KiB  
Article
Biochemical Analysis of Organic Acids and Soluble Sugars in Wild and Cultivated Pomegranate Germplasm Based in Pakistan
by Muhammad Nafees, Muhammad Jafar Jaskani, Ishtiaq Ahmad, Maryam, Irfan Ashraf, Ambreen Maqsood, Sunny Ahmar, Muhammad Azam, Sajjad Hussain, Asma Hanif and Jen-Tsung Chen
Plants 2020, 9(4), 493; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040493 - 11 Apr 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4464
Abstract
Pomegranate is famous for its health benefiting chemical and biochemical constituent compounds. The present study was undertaken to characterize pomegranate germplasm for its various fruit traits, acids, and sugar profiling through high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Among 11 detected acids and 8 [...] Read more.
Pomegranate is famous for its health benefiting chemical and biochemical constituent compounds. The present study was undertaken to characterize pomegranate germplasm for its various fruit traits, acids, and sugar profiling through high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Among 11 detected acids and 8 sugars, citric acid and fructose were predominant in 18 domestic and 5 wild genotypes, respectively. Fruit weight, aril weight and wood portion index (WPI) were ranged from 15.82% to 24.42%, 10.99% to 113.78%, and 2.39% to 17.25%, respectively. Genotypes were grouped as sweet, sweet–sour, sour–sweet, and sour based on citric acid contents. Lactic acid and pyruvic acid showed the highest correlation (r = 0.92), however, sour and sweet genotypes had strong association for acids and sugars, respectively. Straddling of dendrogram showed the flow of genetic material in a cultivated location with wild and cultivated pomegranates grouped in different classes, however, wild and sour landraces grouped in the same class with 71% similarity of traits. Based on the observations of the current study, it was concluded that selected wild and arid zones (Multan, Bahawalpur) genotypes are poor in nutrients (acid and sugars) quality, however, genotypes of Rahim-Yar-Khan, Muzafar Garh, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have a better composition of sugars and acids. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pomegranate landraces association with fruit traits in a principal component analysis (PCA) biplot. Fru; fructose, Glu; glucose, Mal: maltose, Mel: melezitose, Man: mannose, <span class="html-small-caps">d</span>-Xy: <span class="html-small-caps">d</span>-xylose, <span class="html-small-caps">d</span>-Ar: <span class="html-small-caps">d</span>-arabinose, <span class="html-small-caps">d</span>-Ga: <span class="html-small-caps">d</span>-galactose, Cit-A: citric acid, Ma-A: malic acid, Su-A: succinic acid, Ta-A: tartaric acid, Ox-A: oxalic acid, Oxc-A: Oxaloacetic acid, La-A: lactic acid, Ma-A: malonic acid, Mm-A: methylmalonic acid, Pt-A: pyruvic acid, Fu-A: fumaric acid, SI: sourness index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) dendrogram of pomegranate landraces for organic acids and sugars.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3057 KiB  
Article
Water Deficit Affects the Growth and Leaf Metabolite Composition of Young Loquat Plants
by Giovanni Gugliuzza, Giuseppe Talluto, Federico Martinelli, Vittorio Farina and Riccardo Lo Bianco
Plants 2020, 9(2), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020274 - 19 Feb 2020
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4416
Abstract
Water scarcity in the Mediterranean area is very common and understanding responses to drought is important for loquat management and production. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drought on the growth and metabolism of loquat. Ninety two-year-old plants [...] Read more.
Water scarcity in the Mediterranean area is very common and understanding responses to drought is important for loquat management and production. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drought on the growth and metabolism of loquat. Ninety two-year-old plants of ‘Marchetto’ loquat grafted on quince were grown in the greenhouse in 12-liter pots and three irrigation regimes were imposed starting on 11 May and lasting until 27 July, 2013. One-third of the plants was irrigated with 100% of the water consumed (well watered, WW), a second group of plants was irrigated with 66% of the water supplied to the WW plants (mild drought, MD), and a third group was irrigated with 33% of the water supplied to the WW plants (severe drought, SD). Minimum water potential levels of −2.0 MPa were recorded in SD plants at the end of May. Photosynthetic rates were reduced according to water supply (WW > MD > SD), especially during the morning hours. By the end of the trial, severe drought reduced all growth parameters and particularly leaf growth. Drought induced early accumulation of sorbitol in leaves, whereas other carbohydrates were not affected. Of over 100 leaf metabolites investigated, 9 (squalene, pelargonic acid, glucose-1-phosphate, palatinol, capric acid, aconitic acid, xylitol, lauric acid, and alanine) were found to be useful to discriminate between the three irrigation groups, suggesting their involvement in loquat metabolism under drought conditions. Loquat behaved as a moderately drought-tolerant species (limited stem water potential and growth reductions) and the accumulation of sorbitol in favor of sucrose in mildly-stressed plants may be considered an early protective mechanism against leaf dehydration and a potential biochemical marker for precise irrigation management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Stem water potential in loquat plants under well-watered conditions (WW), mild-drought (MD), and severe drought (SD) during the four months of the trial. Error bars represent standard errors of means. When present, different letters indicate significant differences among drought treatments for a specific date (Tukey’s multiple range test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Daily trends of photosynthetic rate (PS) and stomatal conductance (g<sub>s</sub>) in loquat plants under well-watered conditions (WW), mild drought (MD) and severe drought (SD) on 29 May ((<b>A</b>) and (<b>C</b>)) and 26 July ((<b>B</b>) and (<b>D</b>)). Error bars represent standard errors of means. Significance level from analysis of variance: n.s., non-significant; **, significant at P &lt; 0.001. When present, different letters indicate significant differences among irrigation treatments for a specific date (Tukey’s multiple range test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photosynthetic rates (PS) (<b>A</b>) and stomatal conductance (g<sub>s,</sub>) (<b>B</b>) in loquat plants under well-watered conditions (WW), mild drought (MD) and severe drought (SD) during the four months of drought. Significance level from analysis of variance: n.s., non-significant; **, significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001. Error bars represent standard errors of means.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) Sorbitol, (<b>B</b>) sucrose, (<b>C</b>) glucose, and (<b>D</b>) fructose content in leaves of loquat plants under well-watered conditions (WW), mild drought (MD), and severe drought (SD) during the four months of drought. Error bars represent standard errors of means. When present, different letters indicate significant differences among drought treatments for a specific date (Tukey’s multiple range test, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Canonical score plot from linear discriminant analysis of metabolites detected in leaves of loquat plants under well-watered conditions (WW), mild drought (MD) and severe drought (SD) during the four months of trial.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop