Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Next Article in Journal
Haptic Technology: Exploring Its Underexplored Clinical Applications—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Increased Risk of Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Autoantibodies After COVID-19 Pandemic and Vaccination: A Spanish Multicenter Collaborative Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Supernatants from Newly Isolated Lacticaseibacillus paracasei P4 Ameliorate Adipocyte Metabolism in Differentiated 3T3-L1 Cells
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Interplay of Uterine Health and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review

by
Dina Šišljagić
1,2,
Senka Blažetić
3,*,
Marija Heffer
4,
Mihaela Vranješ Delać
5 and
Andrijana Muller
1,2
1
Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetric, University Hospital Center Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
2
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
3
Department of Biology, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
4
Department of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
5
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2024, 12(12), 2801; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122801
Submission received: 18 October 2024 / Revised: 9 December 2024 / Accepted: 9 December 2024 / Published: 10 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Obesity)

Abstract

:
Uterine physiology encompasses the intricate processes governing the structure, function, and regulation of the uterus, a pivotal organ within the female reproductive system. The escalating prevalence of obesity has emerged as a significant global health issue, profoundly impacting various facets of well-being, including female reproductive health. These effects extend to uterine structure and function, influencing reproductive health outcomes in women. They encompass alterations in uterine morphology, disruptions in hormonal signaling, and inflammatory processes. Insulin and leptin, pivotal hormones regulating metabolism, energy balance, and reproductive function, play crucial roles in this context. Insulin chiefly governs glucose metabolism and storage, while leptin regulates appetite and energy expenditure. However, in obesity, resistance to both insulin and leptin can develop, impacting uterine function. Inflammation and oxidative stress further exacerbate the development of uterine dysfunction in obesity. Chronic low-grade inflammation and heightened oxidative stress, characteristic of obesity, contribute to metabolic disruptions and tissue damage, including within the uterus. Obesity significantly disrupts menstrual cycles, fertility, and pregnancy outcomes in women. The accumulation of excess adipose tissue disrupts hormonal equilibrium, disturbs ovarian function, and fosters metabolic irregularities, all of which detrimentally impact reproductive health.

Graphical Abstract">
Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The uterus is a dynamic and complex organ central to female reproductive health. While its primary function is in reproduction, its roles extend beyond this, impacting overall health and disease states related to endocrine [1,2], immune [3,4,5], cardiovascular [6,7,8], neurological [9,10,11], and metabolic systems [12,13]. Understanding these roles is crucial for comprehensive women’s health care, influencing treatment strategies and improving quality of life. Further research into these non-reproductive roles will continue to illuminate the uterus’s full impact on overall health. Obesity, defined by an excessive accumulation of body fat, typically measured by a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher, is a chronic complex disease and one of the major factors impairing health. According to the WHO, in 2022, one in eight people in the world were living with obesity [14]. The rising prevalence of obesity poses significant challenges to female reproductive health. It impacts menstrual regularity, fertility, and pregnancy outcomes and increases the risk of reproductive cancers [15,16].
Pandey (2010) further emphasizes the association between obesity and gynecological issues, such as polycystic ovary syndrome and endometrial polyps [17]. Brown (2010) discusses the genetic contribution to obesity and its implications for reproduction. These studies collectively underscore the urgent need for interventions to address the growing burden of obesity on female reproductive health [18].
Insulin and leptin resistance are critical metabolic disturbances with profound implications for uterine function and female reproductive health. They contribute to a range of reproductive disorders, from menstrual irregularities and infertility to pregnancy complications [19,20] and increased cancer risk [21,22]. Addressing these resistances through lifestyle interventions, medical treatment, and ongoing research is essential for improving reproductive health outcomes. Understanding the mechanisms by which these resistances affect the uterus can help in developing targeted therapies and preventive strategies for women affected by these conditions.
The connection between obesity and uterine health is vital to understanding and managing various reproductive health issues. Overall, the research in this area can lead to better prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies, ultimately improving women’s health and quality of life.

2. Impact of Obesity on Uterine Reproductive and Immune Functions

2.1. Effects of Obesity on Uterine Structure

The uterus, positioned within the pelvic cavity between the bladder and rectum, is a hollow, muscular organ. Comprising three primary layers—the endometrium (inner lining), myometrium (middle muscular layer), and perimetrium (outer layer)—it undergoes shape variations throughout a woman’s life. These changes manifest during puberty, menstruation, pregnancy, and menopause [23,24]. Obesity affects uterine structure and function through a combination of hormonal imbalances [25], chronic inflammation [26], and metabolic disturbances [27]. These effects can lead to a range of reproductive health issues, including endometrial hyperplasia, irregular menstrual cycles [28], increased risk of uterine fibroids [29], endometrial cancer [30], and pregnancy complications [31].
The relationship between estrogen and obesity is bidirectional. Increased adipose tissue in obesity leads to higher levels of circulating estrogen synthesized and metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily of enzymes, specifically aromatase CYP19A1. This prolonged estrogen exposure, without the balancing effect of progesterone, can cause the endometrial lining to thicken excessively, resulting in endometrial hyperplasia [24,32]. This condition can lead to abnormal uterine bleeding and increase the risk of endometrial cancer [33]. Deficiency of estrogen leads to excessive fat accumulation and impairs adipocyte function; on the other hand, adipose tissue of obese individuals is characterized by altered expression of estrogen receptors and key enzymes involved in their synthesis [34]. Additionally, obesity is associated with increased androgen levels, likely mediated by insulin resistance, which may also have implications for uterine health [35]. This relationship will be further explored in Section 3.
Obesity-related hormonal imbalances, particularly elevated estrogen levels, are thought to contribute to the development and growth of uterine fibroids (uterine leiomyomas). These are benign tumor changes that originate from the smooth muscle layer of the uterus. Leiomyoma growth is a consequence of hormonal action that acts through their estrogen and progesterone receptors [36,37]. Fibroids can affect uterine structure and function by causing abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, and infertility, depending on their size and location [29].

2.2. Obesity and Uterine Reproductive Function

The uterus plays a crucial role in the menstrual cycle, as it is central to the preparation for a possible pregnancy each month. A complex interplay of hormones, mainly estrogen and progesterone, produced by the ovaries, governs the menstrual cycle in all phases—menstrual, follicular, ovulatory, and luteal. The uterus prepares for potential pregnancy by thickening the endometrial lining each month during the proliferative phase of the menstrual (uterine) cycle in response to hormonal changes, mainly estrogen and progesterone. If fertilization does not occur, the endometrial lining sheds, leading to menstrual bleeding. The uterus contracts to expel this lining, which can cause cramping. Chronic exposure to elevated levels of estrogen due to increased adipose tissue can lead to endometrial hyperplasia, characterized by abnormal thickening of the endometrial lining [38,39,40]. Endometrial hyperplasia is a risk factor for endometrial cancer, particularly in postmenopausal women [41,42]. Conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), characterized by irregular menstrual cycles, ovarian dysfunction, and hyperandrogenism, are more prevalent in women with obesity and can further impair fertility [43,44,45]. Also, evidence shows that excessive weight can negatively impact reproductive health by altering endometrial gene expression and reducing endometrial receptivity [46]. The uterus must be free of abnormalities, like scarring or fibroids, to support a full-term pregnancy. Obese women more frequently experience prolonged pregnancies, and they have a higher chance of needing interventions during labor and delivery, such as cesarean section, due to factors such as macrosomia, labor dystocia, and inadequate uterine contractions [47,48,49,50]. Studies on uterine contractility in obese women have shown mixed results. Some studies indicated differences in contraction of myometrial strips from obese women, who contracted less frequently and with less force than those from nonobese women [51], while other studies reported no differences in contraction strength and frequency [52,53]. Also, the typically higher cholesterol levels in obese women alter myometrial myocyte cell membranes, particularly the caveolae, which inhibits oxytocin receptor function and increases K+ channel activity, resulting in preventing the uterus from contracting [54], while dysfunctional labor patterns and increased oxytocin use in obese women may not be attributed to differences in oxytocin expression [55]. A high-fat diet accumulates big fat droplets in the stromal layers of the uterus, ovary, and oviducts, with the consequence of altering their histological integrity, and in women, changes like hyperproliferative uterus, vacuolated ovarian tissue, and thickened oviduct walls occur [56]. Maternal obesity in humans and in high-fat diet (HFD) mice is associated with impaired uterine vascular remodeling at the maternal side of the placental–uterine interface, characterized by the presence of smooth muscle layers around arteries and narrower arterial conduits [57,58,59,60].

2.3. Obesity and Uterine Immune Function

Inflammation and oxidative stress play significant roles in uterine dysfunction associated with obesity by affecting endometrial health, reducing fertility, and increasing the risk of pregnancy complications [61]. Obesity is characterized by chronic low-grade inflammation, marked by elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-6, and CRP [62]. Systemic inflammation in obesity can also affect the uterus through circulation, as pro-inflammatory cytokines can cross the blood-uterine barrier and exert direct effects on uterine tissue [63]. Inflammation alters the gene expression and cellular signaling within the endometrium, impairing its ability to prepare for and support implantation [64]. Chronic inflammation may also interfere with endometrial receptivity, crucial for successful embryo implantation. Besides that, it is also linked to negatively impacting egg quality and embryo implantation in the uterus, raising the risk of miscarriage [65]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines can negatively alter the expression of adhesion molecules and cytokines involved in embryo implantation, potentially leading to implantation failure and infertility [66]. Chronic inflammation in the endometrium may also contribute to the development of endometrial disorders such as endometriosis and endometrial hyperplasia, which are associated with infertility and an increased risk of endometrial cancer [67]. Even excessive inflammation can be detrimental; insufficient immune activity may also impair uterine function and embryo invasion, underscoring the need for a delicate balance [68]. A controlled immune response is critical for processes such as endometrial remodeling during the menstrual cycle (especially during the proliferative phase of the uterine cycle) and supporting embryo implantation [69]. Uterine natural killer (uNK) cells in the endometrium have a crucial role in implantation and healthy pregnancy by producing cytokines and growth factors that promote uterine blood vessel growth and support embryo development [70]. Oxidative stress in the uterus can manipulate the immune system by both activating the inflammatory pathways and causing the immune cells, like macrophages, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells, to change their behavior [61,71]. Obesity often leads to an imbalance between the production of ROS and the body’s antioxidant defenses, resulting in oxidative stress. High levels of ROS can damage endometrial cells and impair uterine function [72]. Oxidative stress can disrupt the delicate processes of ovulation, implantation, and early embryo development by damaging the endometrial lining and cellular components, including lipids, proteins, and DNA, leading to cellular dysfunction and tissue damage in the uterus by inhibition of myometrial contraction, which contributes to dysfunctional labor [72,73]. Recent studies indicate a possible association between obesity and the endometrial microbiome [74], which is also part of the immune response. In obese mothers, myometrial arteries exhibit deficits in endothelial cell calcium signaling, and the eNOS system is modified to both contractile and relaxation responses [75].

3. Insulin Resistance and Uterine Health

3.1. Insulin Signaling in the Uterus

Insulin signaling within the uterus is one of the major factors controlling cellular metabolism and development, as well as the processes of cellular growth. Insulin and insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2 (IGF1 and IGF2) bind to their own receptors, resulting in the activation of two important pathways, PI3K-Akt and Ras-MAPK, important in regulating gene expression and the regulation of epithelial cell proliferation [76]. Insulin receptors are expressed in the endometrium, and aberrant insulin signaling may disrupt cellular proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis processes [77]. Dysregulated insulin signaling may lead to abnormal endometrial growth and remodeling, contributing to conditions such as endometrial hyperplasia and dysfunctional uterine bleeding [78,79]. Endometrial proliferation and implantation in mice is regulated by insulin signaling, and insulin receptor and IGF1R are important for embryo implantation, while uterine receptivity is unaffected by insulin receptor ablation [76].

3.2. Mechanisms Linking Insulin Resistance and Uterine Dysfunction

Insulin resistance contributes to uterine dysfunction through several mechanisms: hormonal imbalance (increased androgens), direct impairment of endometrial cell function, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and altered progesterone signaling. These factors together disrupt the normal uterine environment, leading to menstrual irregularities, impaired fertility, and an increased risk of pregnancy complications. Insulin resistance can directly affect endometrial function by altering insulin signaling pathways in uterine tissue. The processes of angiogenesis and endometrial repair are not only strongly estrogen- and progesterone-dependent but also involve NO, platelets, immune cells, and numerous growth factors [80,81]. IR occurs in decrease of NO production, which leads to increase in the shear stress on endothelial cells because of diffuse vasoconstriction. Mutual action of IR, decreased NO and hyperglycemia generate the release of inflammatory cytokines and free radical formation, which leads to endothelial damage, surrounding tissue hypoxia, and possible cellular apoptosis [82]. Elevated insulin levels in vivo modulate apoptosis via the PI3K-Akt pathway, decrease receptors for bovine serum albumin 2 (BMP2), a key decidual marker, impair estrogen and progesterone signaling, further damage endometrial stromal cells, and enhance mitochondrial transmembrane potential, thereby disrupting endometrial decidualization [83]. Resistance-induced hyperinsulinemia can also stimulate the production of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) [84], which may promote endometrial cell proliferation and increase the risk of endometrial cancer. Chronic inflammation alters the expression of genes involved in uterine receptivity and cellular function [85], further reducing the likelihood of successful implantation and increasing the risk of uterine dysfunction. Mechanisms of oxidative stress affect endometrial cell health, causing DNA damage, cell death, and an impaired response to hormonal signals [86], all of which are crucial for a functional and receptive endometrium. Inflammatory mediators, such as TNF-α and IL-6, can disrupt normal endometrial function, impair embryo implantation, and increase the risk of pregnancy complications [87]. The vascular changes allow different factors to leave the blood and form plaques in the blood vessel tunica intima layer. This thickening of the blood vessels leads to increased vascular resistance, together with chronic low-grade inflammation, and leads to atherosclerosis [82,88,89]. Insulin resistance can also affect how the uterus responds to progesterone, the hormone critical for maintaining a healthy endometrial lining during the second half of the menstrual cycle [90]. This can disrupt the menstrual cycle and lead to issues like endometrial hyperplasia or irregular shedding of the uterine lining. A common feature of obesity and conditions like PCOS is closely linked to uterine dysfunction [91]. Women with PCOS often experience insulin resistance, which is strongly linked to anovulation and thickened, dysfunctional endometrial lining, leading to fertility problems. Insulin-mediated glucose transporter factor-4 (GLUT4) facilitates glucose transport to endometrial glandular tissue. Fornes et al. demonstrated reduced levels of GLUT4, insulin pathway proteins, and their phosphorylation in the endometrial tissues of PCOS patients, indicating the presence of localized insulin resistance in the endometrium of these patients [92]. Reduced glucose transport function would cause glucose deficiency in the endometrial cells, which would affect the normal growth of the endometrial cells and lead to embryo implantation failure or increased risk of miscarriage.
Impaired endometrial receptivity in patients with PCOS in humans may be the reason endometrial stromal cells and excess TNF-α negatively affect insulin sensitivity and lead to abnormal energy metabolism by decreasing lipocalin signaling and blocking GLUT-4 membrane transport [93].

3.3. Role of Hyperinsulinemia in Uterine Pathology

In insulin resistance, the body compensates by producing more insulin, creating the state of hyperinsulinemia. Hyperinsulinemia plays a central role in the development of endometrial pathology and menstrual irregularities through its effects on estrogen production, androgen levels, and insulin-like growth factors. Elevated insulin levels stimulate the ovaries to produce excess androgens (male hormones like testosterone), which can disrupt the normal hormonal balance needed for healthy reproductive function. High androgen levels can alter the endometrial environment, leading to irregular menstrual cycles, poor endometrial receptivity, and difficulty with embryo implantation [94], which precedes the process of decidualization dependent on the steroid hormone progesterone acting through the nuclear progesterone receptor (PR) that works through insulin receptor substrate 2 (IRS2) expression [90]. Insulin acts as a growth factor in the endometrium, stimulating the proliferation of endometrial cells [95]. Hyperinsulinemia, a common feature of conditions such as PCOS and hyperinsulinemia type A, has been linked to endometrial dysfunction (hyperplasia [96] and endometrial cancer), menstrual irregularities [92,93], and infertility [97]. These findings suggest a potential role of hyperinsulinemia in the pathophysiology of endometrial pathology and menstrual irregularities. Insulin influences estrogen metabolism by increasing ovarian androgen production and decreasing the liver’s production of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) [98]. This results in higher circulating levels of free estrogen. Since estrogen stimulates the growth of the endometrial lining, chronic exposure to high estrogen levels without the counterbalance of progesterone (which normally happens in anovulatory cycles) can lead to endometrial thickening and hyperplasia. In addition to influencing estrogen, insulin itself acts as a growth-promoting hormone. In the endometrium, this promotes cellular growth and increases the risk of abnormal tissue development [99]. Combined with estrogen’s effects, hyperinsulinemia accelerates endometrial growth, increasing the risk of abnormal pathology, including hyperplasia and possibly even endometrial cancer.

3.4. Pregnancy Complications and Fertility Treatments in Insulin-Resistant Individuals

Insulin resistance significantly impacts fertility and pregnancy outcomes. In individuals with IR, metabolic, hormonal, and inflammatory disturbances can affect ovulation, endometrial receptivity, and fetal development, leading to challenges in fertility treatments and increased pregnancy complications. Wells (1960) noted that insulin administration in pregnant diabetic rats improved fertility and maternal mortality, although fetal mortality remained higher [100]. Seely (2003) suggested that insulin resistance may play a role in pregnancy-induced hypertension, highlighting the need for interventions to reduce insulin resistance and potentially mitigate these risks [101]. Women with IR may require ovulation induction drugs like clomiphene citrate or letrozole to stimulate ovulation [102]. However, insulin resistance can make these treatments less effective, often requiring higher doses or additional medications to achieve successful ovulation. Medications like metformin (an insulin-sensitizer) are frequently used in fertility treatments for women with IR. Metformin helps reduce insulin levels, improve ovulation, and enhance the effectiveness of ovulation induction therapies. In women with PCOS, metformin is often prescribed to regulate cycles and improve pregnancy rates [103,104,105]. Despite ovulation induction, many insulin-resistant individuals experience implantation failure due to the disrupted uterine environment [106]. Insulin-sensitization treatments can improve outcomes, but this remains a significant challenge for fertility treatments. Insulin resistance and associated metabolic disturbances may impact the success rates of IVF treatments. Women with insulin resistance may have lower ovarian reserve, reduced oocyte quality, and decreased embryo implantation rates compared to non-insulin-resistant individuals. However, addressing insulin resistance prior to IVF may improve outcomes [107]. During pregnancy, insulin resistance increases the risk of complications such as miscarriage, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, fetal growth abnormalities, and preterm birth. Malaza et al. reported more adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes compared to those with gestational diabetes. These complications include cesarean section, preterm birth, congenital anomalies, pre-eclampsia, neonatal hypoglycemia, macrosomia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, stillbirth, low Apgar score, large for gestational age infants, induction of labor, respiratory distress syndrome, and miscarriages [108]. This aligns with findings from the International Prospective Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study group [109]. Insulin, as an anabolic hormone, plays a key role in regulating fetal growth. Maternal hyperglycemia leads to fetal hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, which stimulates anabolism and the development of muscle, adipose, and connective tissue. These processes contribute to increased storage of fetal fat and protein, resulting in macrosomia [110]. Careful management and monitoring throughout fertility treatments and pregnancy are essential to optimize outcomes for both the mother and baby. Standard therapy for gestational diabetes requiring insulin therapy [111,112] has shown better maternal and newborn outcomes compared to diet, oral anti-diabetic drugs, or insulin analogues, with a lower incidence of macrosomia [113]. In the management of diabetes during pregnancy, metformin monotherapy is effective in maintaining glycemic control [114] and is specifically recommended for patients with prediabetes or a BMI of 35 kg/m2 [115].

4. Leptin Resistance and Uterine Health

Leptin resistance is a condition in which the body becomes less responsive to the hormone leptin, despite having elevated leptin levels. Leptin, primarily produced by fat cells, plays a key role in regulating energy balance, appetite, and reproductive functions. In the context of uterine function, leptin resistance has significant implications for reproductive health, particularly in individuals with obesity or metabolic disorders.

4.1. Leptin Signaling in the Uterus

Leptin, a hormone secreted by adipose (fat) tissue, serves as a key regulator of energy balance and reproduction, specifically by preparing the endometrium for implantation by influencing factors like angiogenesis (formation of new blood vessels) and cytokine regulation [116]. Leptin affects the uterus through the leptin receptors (Ob-R), belonging to the class I cytokine receptor family, that are expressed in the uterine epithelium, stroma, myometrium, and endometrial glands [117]. The presence of leptin receptors suggests that the uterus is responsive to leptin signaling, which can modulate various cellular processes involved in uterine function. When leptin attaches to Ob-R, it activates the JAK-STAT signaling pathway that promotes gene expression related to growth, differentiation, and inflammatory processes required for the maintenance of the uterine lining and for the embedding of the embryo [118]. Leptin signaling is essential for coordinating energy balance with reproductive function, particularly in the uterus. It regulates the menstrual cycle, enhances endometrial receptivity, supports implantation, and ensures proper pregnancy maintenance. Leptin signaling can also activate the MAPK pathway, influencing cell growth and survival in the uterine tissues. This pathway is important for controlling the structural integrity of the endometrium during the menstrual cycle and early pregnancy [119]. Another significant pathway affected by leptin is the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase PI3K-Akt pathway, which is involved in cellular metabolism and survival [120] by regulating the metabolic demands of uterine cells and ensuring proper nutrient supply during pregnancy. Both mentioned pathways regulate the promotion of endometrial growth and regeneration [21]. Leptin resistance reduces the ability of the endometrium to respond to these signals, potentially leading to implantation failure and infertility [121]. Understanding and managing leptin signaling pathways is crucial for improving reproductive health and addressing fertility issues linked to metabolic imbalances.

4.2. Disruption of Leptin Signaling in Obesity and Uterine Health

In a healthy physiological state, leptin plays an essential role in regulating reproductive processes like regulation of the menstrual cycle and endometrial receptivity. Different studies indicated significant variations in serum leptin during the female menstrual cycle, but results are not uniform. Many previous studies have shown conflicting results related to the leptin levels during the menstrual cycle. Some researchers noted that the leptin concentration increases gradually from the first phase, reaching the highest concentration in the luteal phase [122,123], while others noted a highest concentration in the pre-ovulatory phase [124]. The disruption in leptin signaling, particularly leptin resistance seen in metabolic disorders like obesity, has profound consequences for uterine health and overall reproductive function, leading to significant reproductive dysfunctions, including infertility, poor pregnancy outcomes, and uterine pathologies [125]. Leptin is involved in the regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis, influencing the secretion of hormones such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). These hormones are critical for ovulation and the maintenance of a regular menstrual cycle. It also modulates the immune environment in the uterus to support early pregnancy [126]. Leptin resistance reduces the ability of leptin receptors (Ob-R) in the endometrium to respond to the hormone [116,127]. This impairs the regulatory function of leptin on cellular proliferation, immune defense, and the development of blood vessels within the uterine cavity structure, leading to a situation where the endometrium does not adequately react to hormonal stimuli towards its readiness for embryo attachment [64]. When this signaling is impaired, the uterine lining is less capable of supporting the attachment and growth of an embryo, leading to implantation failure and reduced fertility [128]. Leptin promotes the development of new blood vessels in the endometrium through its regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [129]. In obesity, disrupted leptin signaling compromises this process, leading to poor uterine vascularization and a suboptimal environment for embryo implantation [130,131]. The impaired leptin signaling in obesity disrupts normal ovarian function and further contributes to infertility in PCOS patients [132]. Leptin resistance reduces the uterus’s ability to support early pregnancy by compromising endometrial receptivity and placental development [133]. As a result, women with obesity and leptin resistance face a higher risk of early pregnancy loss. Addressing leptin resistance through weight management, lifestyle changes, and pharmacological interventions can help improve reproductive health and enhance fertility in individuals with obesity.

4.3. Potential Therapeutic Targets to Restore Leptin Sensitivity in the Context of Obesity

Restoring leptin sensitivity in obesity is a complex challenge, as leptin resistance often involves multiple pathways and factors. Correia (2007) and Santoro (2015) both highlight the potential of restoring leptin sensitivity as a treatment target, with Santoro emphasizing the need for new therapeutic tools [134,135]. GLP-1 receptors are widely distributed throughout the reproductive system, and both preclinical models and some clinical studies suggest that GLP-1 plays a key role in linking the reproductive and metabolic systems. GLP-1 also appears to have anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects in the gonads and endometrium, particularly in conditions like obesity, diabetes, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) [136]. Sáinz (2015) suggests that anti-inflammatory drugs or bioactive food components could help overcome leptin resistance [137], while Salazar (2019) underscores the importance of addressing leptin resistance in the context of type 2 diabetes [138]. These studies collectively underscore the need for further research to identify and develop effective therapeutic targets for restoring leptin sensitivity in obesity. Based on the in vitro studies, there are some potential therapeutic targets and strategies. Enhancing leptin signaling through the JAK2/STAT3 pathway can potentially restore sensitivity. This involves targeting molecules that modulate the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) proteins [139]. Also, suppressing Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) proteins, especially SOCS3, which inhibit leptin signaling, could help restore leptin sensitivity [140]. Targeting inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6) or signaling pathways (e.g., NF-κB) could reduce leptin resistance [141]. Improving insulin sensitivity can often help with leptin resistance. The gut microbiota plays a role in systemic inflammation and metabolic processes. Probiotics or prebiotics might help in restoring leptin sensitivity by influencing gut health [142]. Certain dietary components and bioactive compounds have been shown to modulate leptin signaling and improve leptin sensitivity. Omega-3 fatty acids, found in fish oil and certain plant sources, have anti-inflammatory properties and may enhance leptin signaling [143]. Polyphenols, such as resveratrol found in red grapes and berries, have been shown to enhance insulin sensitivity and modulate leptin signaling pathways. They achieve this by suppressing leptin expression in adipocytes, reducing hyperleptinemia, and alleviating leptin resistance [144]. Pharmacological leptin sensitizers include small molecules that produce modest weight loss when used alone but significantly amplify the anorectic effects of exogenous leptin. Examples include meta-chlorophenylpiperazine, a serotonin receptor agonist and reuptake inhibitor; metformin, a widely used anti-diabetic medication; and betulinic acid, which likely enhances leptin sensitivity through PTP1B inhibition [145,146,147]. Each of these strategies has its own set of challenges and potential benefits. Along with dietary manipulations to restore leptin sensitivity, exercise also decreases body weight and leptinemia and improves leptin sensitivity by activating leptin sensitive neurons in the VMH and increasing pSTAT3 in the VTA. This effect seems to be independent of fat mass loss [148,149]. Research is ongoing to better understand how these various factors interact and how best to target them therapeutically.

5. Future Directions and Conclusions

The relationship between uterine health and obesity is complex and deeply intertwined. Obesity influences uterine function through metabolic, hormonal, and inflammatory pathways. Obesity leads to insulin resistance and an imbalance in circulating adipokines, characterized by increased levels of leptin and decreased levels of adiponectin. Such changes can disrupt the normal physiological function of the uterus. In addition, such changes create an environment for chronic inflammation that has been associated with several conditions of the uterus, including endometrial hyperplasia, fibroids, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Additionally, obesity-induced hormonal imbalances, such as elevated estrogen levels, can affect the uterine lining, increasing the risk of conditions like endometrial cancer.
The impact of obesity on uterine health is further compounded by alterations in the uterine microbiome and epigenetic modifications that may influence long-term uterine function and fertility. Obesity also affects uterine blood flow, contributing to pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia. These factors together contribute not only to poor fertility and pregnancy outcomes but also to the enhanced risk of reproductive disorders and cancers.
This would be beneficial in targeted therapies and prevention strategies to improve uterine health among obese individuals. As obesity is an important source of metabolic and hormonal disruption, addressing these problems could have the potential to improve reproductive health outcomes and reduce the burden of obesity-related uterine disorders.

Author Contributions

D.Š., S.B. and A.M., Conceptualization, D.Š. and S.B. writing—original draft preparation, D.Š., S.B., A.M., M.V.D. and M.H.; writing—review and editing, A.M. and M.H., supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Riddick, D.H.; Daly, D.C.; Walters, C.A. The Uterus as an Endocrine Compartment. Clin. Perinatol. 1983, 10, 627–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kelleher, A.M.; DeMayo, F.J.; Spencer, T.E. Uterine Glands: Developmental Biology and Functional Roles in Pregnancy. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 1424–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Feyaerts, D.; Joosten, I.; van der Molen, R.G. A Pregnancy to Remember: Trained Immunity of the Uterine Mucosae. Mucosal Immunol. 2021, 14, 539–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tur-Kaspa, I.; Gleicher, N. Immunology of the Uterus. In The Uterus: Pathology, Diagnosis, and Management; Altchek, A., Deligdisch, L., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 27–38. ISBN 978-1-4613-9086-2. [Google Scholar]
  5. Agostinis, C.; Mangogna, A.; Bossi, F.; Ricci, G.; Kishore, U.; Bulla, R. Uterine Immunity and Microbiota: A Shifting Paradigm. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Smith, R.; Imtiaz, M.; Banney, D.; Paul, J.W.; Young, R.C. Why the Heart Is like an Orchestra and the Uterus Is like a Soccer Crowd. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prefumo, F.; Sharma, R.; Brecker, S.J.D.; Gaze, D.C.; Collinson, P.O.; Thilaganathan, B. Maternal Cardiac Function in Early Pregnancies with High Uterine Artery Resistance. Ultrasound Obs. Gynecol. 2007, 29, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Uteroplacental Blood Flow, Cardiac Function, and Pregnancy Outcome in Women With Congenital Heart Disease|Circulation. Available online: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002810 (accessed on 9 October 2024).
  9. Uterus Plays a Role in Brain Function, Animal Study Shows. Available online: https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/uterus-plays-role-brain-function-animal-study-shows (accessed on 9 October 2024).
  10. Koebele, S.V.; Bernaud, V.E.; Northup-Smith, S.N.; Willeman, M.N.; Strouse, I.M.; Bulen, H.L.; Schrier, A.R.; Newbern, J.M.; DeNardo, D.F.; Mayer, L.P.; et al. Gynecological Surgery in Adulthood Imparts Cognitive and Brain Changes in Rats: A Focus on Hysterectomy at Short-, Moderate-, and Long-Term Intervals after Surgery. Horm. Behav. 2023, 155, 105411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Koebele, S.V.; Palmer, J.M.; Hadder, B.; Melikian, R.; Fox, C.; Strouse, I.M.; DeNardo, D.F.; George, C.; Daunis, E.; Nimer, A.; et al. Hysterectomy Uniquely Impacts Spatial Memory in a Rat Model: A Role for the Nonpregnant Uterus in Cognitive Processes. Endocrinology 2019, 160, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Olusi, A.M.; Rabiu, K.A.; Oduola-Owoo, B.B.; Rasheed, M.W.; Oduola-Owoo, L.T.; Windapo, O.B. Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome and Uterine Leiomyoma: A Case Control Study. Niger. Health J. 2024, 24, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Salcedo, A.C.; Shehata, H.; Berry, A.; Riba, C. Insulin Resistance and Other Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease amongst Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. J. Metab. Health 2022, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Obesity and Overweight. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  15. Zheng, L.; Yang, L.; Guo, Z.; Yao, N.; Zhang, S.; Pu, P. Obesity and Its Impact on Female Reproductive Health: Unraveling the Connections. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 14, 1326546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Schon, S.B.; Cabre, H.E.; Redman, L.M. The Impact of Obesity on Reproductive Health and Metabolism in Reproductive-Age Females. Fertil. Steril. 2024, 122, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pandey, S.; Bhattacharya, S. Impact of Obesity on Gynecology. Womens Health 2010, 6, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Brown, K.; Apuzzio, J.; Weiss, G. Maternal Obesity and Associated Reproductive Consequences. Womens Health 2010, 6, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Thong, E.P.; Codner, E.; Laven, J.S.E.; Teede, H. Diabetes: A Metabolic and Reproductive Disorder in Women. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 134–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Metwally, M.; Li, T.C.; Ledger, W.L. The Impact of Obesity on Female Reproductive Function. Obes. Rev. 2007, 8, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak, A.; Lukaszuk, A.; Janicka-Kośnik, M.; Wdowiak, A.; Jakiel, G. Role of Leptin and Adiponectin in Endometrial Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sidorkiewicz, I.; Jóźwik, M.; Niemira, M.; Krętowski, A. Insulin Resistance and Endometrial Cancer: Emerging Role for microRNA. Cancers 2020, 12, 2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ameer, M.A.; Fagan, S.E.; Sosa-Stanley, J.N.; Peterson, D.C. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis: Uterus. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gasner, A.; Aatsha, P.A. Physiology, Uterus. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ylli, D.; Sidhu, S.; Parikh, T.; Burman, K.D. Endocrine Changes in Obesity. In Endotext [Internet]; MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth, MA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  26. Parisi, F.; Milazzo, R.; Savasi, V.M.; Cetin, I. Maternal Low-Grade Chronic Inflammation and Intrauterine Programming of Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yong, W.; Wang, J.; Leng, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, H. Role of Obesity in Female Reproduction. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2023, 20, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Itriyeva, K. The Effects of Obesity on the Menstrual Cycle. Curr. Probl. Pediatr. Adolesc. Health Care 2022, 52, 101241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Qin, H.; Lin, Z.; Vásquez, E.; Luan, X.; Guo, F.; Xu, L. Association between Obesity and the Risk of Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2021, 75, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Harvey, S.V.; Wentzensen, N.; Bertrand, K.; Black, A.; Brinton, L.A.; Chen, C.; Costas, L.; Dal Maso, L.; De Vivo, I.; Du, M.; et al. Associations of Life Course Obesity with Endometrial Cancer in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2). Int. J. Epidemiol. 2023, 52, 1086–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Obesity in Pregnancy: Risks and Management|AAFP. Available online: https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2018/0501/p559.html (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  32. Mooney, S.S.; Sumithran, P. Does Weight Loss in Women with Obesity Induce Regression of Endometrial Hyperplasia? A Systematic Review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2023, 288, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Overweight and Obesity|Cancer Australia. Available online: https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/cancer-types/endometrial-cancer/awareness/lifestyle/overweight-and-obesity (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  34. Kuryłowicz, A. Estrogens in Adipose Tissue Physiology and Obesity-Related Dysfunction. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ding, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, S.; Chen, X.; Liang, W.; Xie, Q. Resistance to the Insulin and Elevated Level of Androgen: A Major Cause of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 741764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Borahay, M.A.; Asoglu, M.R.; Mas, A.; Adam, S.; Kilic, G.S.; Al-Hendy, A. Estrogen Receptors and Signaling in Fibroids: Role in Pathobiology and Therapeutic Implications. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 24, 1235–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ali, M.; Ciebiera, M.; Vafaei, S.; Alkhrait, S.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chiang, Y.-F.; Huang, K.-C.; Feduniw, S.; Hsia, S.-M.; Al-Hendy, A. Progesterone Signaling and Uterine Fibroid Pathogenesis; Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutics. Cells 2023, 12, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barboza, I.C.; Depes, D.D.B.; Vianna, I.; Patriarca, M.T.; Arruda, R.M.; Martins, J.A.; Lopes, R.G.C. Analysis of Endometrial Thickness Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasonography in Obese Patients. Einstein 2014, 12, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lu, L.; Risch, H.; Irwin, M.L.; Mayne, S.T.; Cartmel, B.; Schwartz, P.; Rutherford, T.; Yu, H. Long-Term Overweight and Weight Gain in Early Adulthood in Association with Risk of Endometrial Cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 129, 1237–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Viola, A.S.; Gouveia, D.; Andrade, L.; Aldrighi, J.M.; Viola, C.F.M.; Bahamondes, L. Prevalence of Endometrial Cancer and Hyperplasia in Non-Symptomatic Overweight and Obese Women. Aust. N. Z. J. Obs. Gynaecol. 2008, 48, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, L.; Wei, W.; Cai, M. A Review of the Risk Factors Associated with Endometrial Hyperplasia During Perimenopause. IJWH 2024, 16, 1475–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Endometrial Hyperplasia—An Overview|ScienceDirect Topics. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/endometrial-hyperplasia (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  43. Singh, S.; Pal, N.; Shubham, S.; Sarma, D.K.; Verma, V.; Marotta, F.; Kumar, M. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Etiology, Current Management, and Future Therapeutics. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hajam, Y.A.; Rather, H.A.; Neelam; Kumar, R.; Basheer, M.; Reshi, M.S. A Review on Critical Appraisal and Pathogenesis of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Endocr. Metab. Sci. 2024, 14, 100162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Barber, T.M.; Franks, S. Obesity and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Clin. Endocrinol. 2021, 95, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gonnella, F.; Konstantinidou, F.; Donato, M.; Gatta, D.M.P.; Peserico, A.; Barboni, B.; Stuppia, L.; Nothnick, W.B.; Gatta, V. The Molecular Link between Obesity and the Endometrial Environment: A Starting Point for Female Infertility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bjorklund, J.; Wiberg-Itzel, E.; Wallstrom, T. Is There an Increased Risk of Cesarean Section in Obese Women after Induction of Labor? A Retrospective Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kissler, K.; Hurt, K.J. The Pathophysiology of Labor Dystocia: Theme with Variations. Reprod. Sci. 2023, 30, 729–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bogaerts, A.; Witters, I.; Van den Bergh, B.R.H.; Jans, G.; Devlieger, R. Obesity in Pregnancy: Altered Onset and Progression of Labour. Midwifery 2013, 29, 1303–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Azaïs, H.; Leroy, A.; Ghesquiere, L.; Deruelle, P.; Hanssens, S. Effects of Adipokines and Obesity on Uterine Contractility. Cytokine Growth Factor. Rev. 2017, 34, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, J.; Bricker, L.; Wray, S.; Quenby, S. Poor Uterine Contractility in Obese Women. BJOG 2007, 114, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Higgins, C.A.; Martin, W.; Anderson, L.; Blanks, A.M.; Norman, J.E.; McConnachie, A.; Nelson, S.M. Maternal Obesity and Its Relationship with Spontaneous and Oxytocin-Induced Contractility of Human Myometrium in Vitro. Reprod. Sci. 2010, 17, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chin, J.R.; Henry, E.; Holmgren, C.M.; Varner, M.W.; Branch, D.W. Maternal Obesity and Contraction Strength in the First Stage of Labor. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2012, 207, 129.e1–129.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Carvajal, J.A.; Oporto, J.I. The Myometrium in Pregnant Women with Obesity. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2021, 19, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Grotegut, C.A.; Gunatilake, R.P.; Feng, L.; Heine, R.P.; Murtha, A.P. The Influence of Maternal Body Mass Index on Myometrial Oxytocin Receptor Expression in Pregnancy. Reprod. Sci. 2013, 20, 1471–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gao, X.; Li, Y.; Ma, Z.; Jing, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ding, Z. Obesity Induces Morphological and Functional Changes in Female Reproductive System through Increases in NF-κB and MAPK Signaling in Mice. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2021, 19, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Baltayeva, J.; Konwar, C.; Castellana, B.; Mara, D.L.; Christians, J.K.; Beristain, A.G. Obesogenic Diet Exposure Alters Uterine Natural Killer Cell Biology and Impairs Vasculature Remodeling in Mice†. Biol. Reprod. 2020, 102, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hayes, E.K.; Tessier, D.R.; Percival, M.E.; Holloway, A.C.; Petrik, J.J.; Gruslin, A.; Raha, S. Trophoblast Invasion and Blood Vessel Remodeling Are Altered in a Rat Model of Lifelong Maternal Obesity. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 21, 648–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Perdu, S.; Castellana, B.; Kim, Y.; Chan, K.; DeLuca, L.; Beristain, A.G. Maternal Obesity Drives Functional Alterations in Uterine NK Cells. JCI Insight 2016, 1, e85560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Roberts, K.A.; Riley, S.C.; Reynolds, R.M.; Barr, S.; Evans, M.; Statham, A.; Hor, K.; Jabbour, H.N.; Norman, J.E.; Denison, F.C. Placental Structure and Inflammation in Pregnancies Associated with Obesity. Placenta 2011, 32, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jiménez-Osorio, A.S.; Carreón-Torres, E.; Correa-Solís, E.; Ángel-García, J.; Arias-Rico, J.; Jiménez-Garza, O.; Morales-Castillejos, L.; Díaz-Zuleta, H.A.; Baltazar-Tellez, R.M.; Sánchez-Padilla, M.L.; et al. Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Induced by Obesity, Gestational Diabetes, and Preeclampsia in Pregnancy: Role of High-Density Lipoproteins as Vectors for Bioactive Compounds. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Khanna, D.; Khanna, S.; Khanna, P.; Kahar, P.; Patel, B.M. Obesity: A Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation and Its Markers. Cureus 2022, 14, e22711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. St-Germain, L.E.; Castellana, B.; Baltayeva, J.; Beristain, A.G. Maternal Obesity and the Uterine Immune Cell Landscape: The Shaping Role of Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Blanco-Breindel, M.F.; Singh, M.; Kahn, J. Endometrial Receptivity. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zavatta, A.; Parisi, F.; Mandò, C.; Scaccabarozzi, C.; Savasi, V.M.; Cetin, I. Role of Inflammaging on the Reproductive Function and Pregnancy. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2023, 64, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Salamun, V.; Bokal, E.V.; Maver, A.; Papler, T.B. Transcriptome Study of Receptive Endometrium in Overweight and Obese Women Shows Important Expression Differences in Immune Response and Inflammatory Pathways in Women Who Do Not Conceive. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0261873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ye, J.; Peng, H.; Huang, X.; Qi, X. The Association between Endometriosis and Risk of Endometrial Cancer and Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. BMC Womens Health 2022, 22, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wu, H.-M.; Chen, L.-H.; Hsu, L.-T.; Lai, C.-H. Immune Tolerance of Embryo Implantation and Pregnancy: The Role of Human Decidual Stromal Cell- and Embryonic-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ma, H.; Cai, S.; Yang, L.; Wang, L.; Ding, J.; Li, L.; Li, H.; Huang, C.; Diao, L. How Do Pre-Pregnancy Endometrial Macrophages Contribute to Pregnancy? J. Reprod. Immunol. 2022, 154, 103736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lédée, N.; Petitbarat, M.; Prat-Ellenberg, L.; Dray, G.; Vaucoret, V.; Kazhalawi, A.; Rodriguez-Pozo, A.; Habeichi, N.; Ruoso, L.; Cassuto, N.G.; et al. The Next Frontier in ART: Harnessing the Uterine Immune Profile for Improved Performance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sharma, S. Natural Killer Cells and Regulatory T Cells in Early Pregnancy Loss. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2014, 58, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lu, J.; Wang, Z.; Cao, J.; Chen, Y.; Dong, Y. A Novel and Compact Review on the Role of Oxidative Stress in Female Reproduction. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2018, 16, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kaltsas, A.; Zikopoulos, A.; Moustakli, E.; Zachariou, A.; Tsirka, G.; Tsiampali, C.; Palapela, N.; Sofikitis, N.; Dimitriadis, F. The Silent Threat to Women’s Fertility: Uncovering the Devastating Effects of Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. King, S.; Osei, F.; Marsh, C. Prevalence of Pathogenic Microbes within the Endometrium in Normal Weight vs. Obese Women with Infertility. Reprod. Med. 2024, 5, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Prendergast, C.; Wray, S. Human Myometrial Artery Function and Endothelial Cell Calcium Signalling Are Reduced by Obesity: Can This Contribute to Poor Labour Outcomes? Acta Physiol. 2019, 227, e13341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sekulovski, N.; Whorton, A.E.; Shi, M.; Hayashi, K.; MacLean, J.A. Insulin Signaling Is an Essential Regulator of Endometrial Proliferation and Implantation in Mice. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chen, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, B.; Zeng, X.; Zeng, X.; Cai, S.; Ye, Q.; Yang, G.; Ye, C.; Shang, L.; et al. Uterine Insulin Sensitivity Defects Induced Embryo Implantation Loss Associated with Mitochondrial Dysfunction-Triggered Oxidative Stress. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 2021, 6655685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jain, V.; Chodankar, R.R.; Maybin, J.A.; Critchley, H.O.D. Uterine Bleeding: How Understanding Endometrial Physiology Underpins Menstrual Health. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022, 18, 290–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Singh, G.; Cue, L.; Puckett, Y. Endometrial Hyperplasia. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  80. Chodankar, R.; Critchley, H.O.D. Biomarkers in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding†. Biol. Reprod. 2019, 101, 1155–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ciarmela, P.; Islam, M.S.; Reis, F.M.; Gray, P.C.; Bloise, E.; Petraglia, F.; Vale, W.; Castellucci, M. Growth Factors and Myometrium: Biological Effects in Uterine Fibroid and Possible Clinical Implications. Hum. Reprod. Update 2011, 17, 772–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ormazabal, V.; Nair, S.; Elfeky, O.; Aguayo, C.; Salomon, C.; Zuñiga, F.A. Association between Insulin Resistance and the Development of Cardiovascular Disease. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, C.; Yang, C.; Li, N.; Liu, X.; He, J.; Chen, X.; Ding, Y.; Tong, C.; Peng, C.; Yin, H.; et al. Elevated Insulin Levels Compromise Endometrial Decidualization in Mice with Decrease in Uterine Apoptosis in Early-Stage Pregnancy. Arch. Toxicol. 2019, 93, 3601–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Friedrich, N.; Thuesen, B.; Jørgensen, T.; Juul, A.; Spielhagen, C.; Wallaschofksi, H.; Linneberg, A. The Association Between IGF-I and Insulin Resistance. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 768–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cicinelli, E.; Vitagliano, A.; Loizzi, V.; De Ziegler, D.; Fanelli, M.; Bettocchi, S.; Nardelli, C.; Trojano, G.; Cicinelli, R.; Minervini, C.F.; et al. Altered Gene Expression Encoding Cytochines, Grow Factors and Cell Cycle Regulators in the Endometrium of Women with Chronic Endometritis. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Didziokaite, G.; Biliute, G.; Gudaite, J.; Kvedariene, V. Oxidative Stress as a Potential Underlying Cause of Minimal and Mild Endometriosis-Related Infertility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kwon, M.J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, K.J.; Ko, E.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Ryu, C.S.; Ha, Y.H.; Kim, Y.R.; Kim, N.K. Genetic Association between Inflammatory-Related Polymorphism in STAT3, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and Idiopathic Recurrent Implantation Failure. Genes 2023, 14, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Do, H.D.; Lohsoonthorn, V.; Jiamjarasrangsi, W.; Lertmaharit, S.; Williams, M.A. Prevalence of Insulin Resistance and Its Relationship with Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors among Thai Adults over 35 Years Old. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2010, 89, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. De Boer, I.H.; Katz, R.; Chonchol, M.B.; Fried, L.F.; Ix, J.H.; Kestenbaum, B.; Mukamal, K.J.; Peralta, C.A.; Siscovick, D.S. Insulin Resistance, Cystatin C, and Mortality Among Older Adults. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 1355–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Neff, A.M.; Yu, J.; Taylor, R.N.; Bagchi, I.C.; Bagchi, M.K. Insulin Signaling Via Progesterone-Regulated Insulin Receptor Substrate 2 Is Critical for Human Uterine Decidualization. Endocrinology 2019, 161, bqz021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Barber, T.M.; Hanson, P.; Weickert, M.O.; Franks, S. Obesity and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Implications for Pathogenesis and Novel Management Strategies. Clin. Med. Insights Reprod. Health 2019, 13, 1179558119874042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Fornes, R.; Ormazabal, P.; Rosas, C.; Gabler, F.; Vantman, D.; Romero, C.; Vega, M. Changes in the Expression of Insulin Signaling Pathway Molecules in Endometria from Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Women with or without Hyperinsulinemia. Mol. Med. 2010, 16, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Oróstica, L.; García, P.; Vera, C.; García, V.; Romero, C.; Vega, M. Effect of TNF-α on Molecules Related to the Insulin Action in Endometrial Cells Exposed to Hyperandrogenic and Hyperinsulinic Conditions Characteristics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Reprod. Sci. 2018, 25, 1000–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yusuf, A.N.M.; Amri, M.F.; Ugusman, A.; Hamid, A.A.; Wahab, N.A.; Mokhtar, M.H. Hyperandrogenism and Its Possible Effects on Endometrial Receptivity: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Dai, C.; Li, N.; Song, G.; Yang, Y.; Ning, X. Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Regulates Growth of Endometrial Carcinoma through PI3k Signaling Pathway in Insulin-Resistant Type 2 Diabetes. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 3329–3336. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Shan, W.; Ning, C.; Luo, X.; Zhou, Q.; Gu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, X. Hyperinsulinemia Is Associated with Endometrial Hyperplasia and Disordered Proliferative Endometrium: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 132, 606–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Giudice, L.C. Endometrium in PCOS: Implantation and Predisposition to Endocrine CA. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 20, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Xing, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, H.; He, B. Effect of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Mechanisms, Manifestations, Genetics, and Treatment. Int. J. Womens Health 2022, 14, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yu, K.; Huang, Z.-Y.; Xu, X.-L.; Li, J.; Fu, X.-W.; Deng, S.-L. Estrogen Receptor Function: Impact on the Human Endometrium. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 827724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Eriksson, U.J.; Swenne, I. Diabetes in Pregnancy: Fetal Macrosomia, Hyperinsulinism, and 1slet Hyperplasia in the Offspring of Rats Subjected to Temporary Protein-Energy Malnutrition Early in Life. Pediatr. Res. 1993, 34, 791–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Seely, E.W.; Solomon, C.G. Insulin Resistance and Its Potential Role in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 2393–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Franik, S.; Le, Q.-K.; Kremer, J.A.; Kiesel, L.; Farquhar, C. Aromatase Inhibitors (Letrozole) for Ovulation Induction in Infertile Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022, 2022, CD010287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Johnson, N.P. Metformin Use in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Ann. Transl. Med. 2014, 2, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Elnashar, A.M. The Role of Metformin in Ovulation Induction: Current Status. Middle East. Fertil. Soc. J. 2011, 16, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Attia, G.M.; Almouteri, M.M.; Alnakhli, F.T. Role of Metformin in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)-Related Infertility. Cureus 2023, 15, e44493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Lei, R.; Chen, S.; Li, W. Advances in the Study of the Correlation between Insulin Resistance and Infertility. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1288326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, X.; Kwak-Kim, J.; Wu, L. Insulin Resistance Adversely Affect IVF Outcomes in Lean Women Without PCOS. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 734638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Malaza, N.; Masete, M.; Adam, S.; Dias, S.; Nyawo, T.; Pheiffer, C. A Systematic Review to Compare Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Pregestational Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. Off. Organ. Int. Fed. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2002, 78, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ornoy, A.; Becker, M.; Weinstein-Fudim, L.; Ergaz, Z. Diabetes during Pregnancy: A Maternal Disease Complicating the Course of Pregnancy with Long-Term Deleterious Effects on the Offspring. A Clinical Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Affres, H.; Senat, M.-V.; Letourneau, A.; Deruelle, P.; Coustols-Valat, M.; Bouchghoul, H.; Bouyer, J. Glyburide Therapy for Gestational Diabetes: Glycaemic Control, Maternal Hypoglycaemia, and Treatment Failure. Diabetes Metab. 2021, 47, 101210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Balsells, M.; García-Patterson, A.; Solà, I.; Roqué, M.; Gich, I.; Corcoy, R. Glibenclamide, Metformin, and Insulin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMJ 2015, 350, h102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Subiabre, M.; Silva, L.; Toledo, F.; Paublo, M.; López, M.A.; Boric, M.P.; Sobrevia, L. Insulin Therapy and Its Consequences for the Mother, Foetus, and Newborn in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 2949–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Priya, G.; Kalra, S. Metformin in the Management of Diabetes during Pregnancy and Lactation. Drugs Context 2018, 7, 212523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Aroda, V.R.; Ratner, R.E. Metformin and Type 2 Diabetes Prevention. Diabetes Spectr. 2018, 31, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Jafari-Gharabaghlou, D.; Vaghari-Tabari, M.; Oghbaei, H.; Lotz, L.; Zarezadeh, R.; Rastgar Rezaei, Y.; Ranjkesh, M.; Nouri, M.; Fattahi, A.; Nikanfar, S.; et al. Role of Adipokines in Embryo Implantation. Endocr. Connect. 2021, 10, R267–R278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. González, R.R.; Caballero-Campo, P.; Jasper, M.; Mercader, A.; Devoto, L.; Pellicer, A.; Simon, C. Leptin and Leptin Receptor Are Expressed in the Human Endometrium and Endometrial Leptin Secretion Is Regulated by the Human Blastocyst. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 4883–4888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Malik, M.; Britten, J.; DeAngelis, A.; Catherino, W.H. Cross-Talk between Janus Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription Pathway and Transforming Growth Factor Beta Pathways and Increased collagen1A1 Production in Uterine Leiomyoma Cells. F&S Sci. 2020, 1, 206–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Makieva, S.; Giacomini, E.; Ottolina, J.; Sanchez, A.M.; Papaleo, E.; Viganò, P. Inside the Endometrial Cell Signaling Subway: Mind the Gap(s). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Garcia-Galiano, D.; Borges, B.C.; Allen, S.J.; Elias, C.F. PI3K Signaling in Leptin Receptor Cells: Role in Growth and Reproduction. J. Neuroendocr. 2019, 31, e12685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Massimiani, M.; Lacconi, V.; La Civita, F.; Ticconi, C.; Rago, R.; Campagnolo, L. Molecular Signaling Regulating Endometrium–Blastocyst Crosstalk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Asimakopoulos, B.; Milousis, A.; Gioka, T.; Kabouromiti, G.; Gianisslis, G.; Troussa, A.; Simopoulou, M.; Katergari, S.; Tripsianis, G.; Nikolettos, N. Serum Pattern of Circulating Adipokines throughout the Physiological Menstrual Cycle. Endocr. J. 2009, 56, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ajala, O.M.; Ogunro, P.S.; Elusanmi, G.F.; Ogunyemi, O.E.; Bolarinde, A.A. Changes in Serum Leptin during Phases of Menstrual Cycle of Fertile Women: Relationship to Age Groups and Fertility. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 11, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Ahrens, K.; Mumford, S.L.; Schliep, K.C.; Kissell, K.A.; Perkins, N.J.; Wactawski-Wende, J.; Schisterman, E.F. Serum Leptin Levels and Reproductive Function during the Menstrual Cycle. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2014, 210, 248.e1–248.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Elias, C.F.; Purohit, D. Leptin Signaling and Circuits in Puberty and Fertility. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 70, 841–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Briffa, J.F.; McAinch, A.J.; Romano, T.; Wlodek, M.E.; Hryciw, D.H. Leptin in Pregnancy and Development: A Contributor to Adulthood Disease? Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metabolism. 2015, 308, pp. E335–E350. Available online: https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajpendo.00312.2014 (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  127. Kim, T.H.; Bae, N.; Kim, T.; Hsu, A.L.; Hunter, M.I.; Shin, J.-H.; Jeong, J.-W. Leptin Stimulates Endometriosis Development in Mouse Models. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Teh, W.-T.; McBain, J.; Rogers, P. What Is the Contribution of Embryo-Endometrial Asynchrony to Implantation Failure? J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016, 33, 1419–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Curtis, G.H.; Reeve, R.E.; Crespi, E.J. Leptin Signaling Promotes Blood Vessel Formation in the Xenopus Tail during the Embryo-Larval Transition. Dev. Biol. 2024, 512, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zenclussen, A.C.; Hämmerling, G.J. Cellular Regulation of the Uterine Microenvironment That Enables Embryo Implantation. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Obradovic, M.; Sudar-Milovanovic, E.; Soskic, S.; Essack, M.; Arya, S.; Stewart, A.J.; Gojobori, T.; Isenovic, E.R. Leptin and Obesity: Role and Clinical Implication. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 585887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Sharma, Y.; Galvão, A.M. Maternal Obesity and Ovarian Failure: Is Leptin the Culprit? Anim. Reprod. 2023, 19, e20230007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Muhammad, T.; Wan, Y.; Lv, Y.; Li, H.; Naushad, W.; Chan, W.-Y.; Lu, G.; Chen, Z.-J.; Liu, H. Maternal Obesity: A Potential Disruptor of Female Fertility and Current Interventions to Reduce Associated Risks. Obes. Rev. 2023, 24, e13603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Santoro, A.; Mattace Raso, G.; Meli, R. Drug Targeting of Leptin Resistance. Life Sci. 2015, 140, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Correia, M.L.G.; Haynes, W.G. Lessons from Leptin’s Molecular Biology: Potential Therapeutic Actions of Recombinant Leptin and Leptin-Related Compounds. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Jensterle, M.; Janez, A.; Fliers, E.; DeVries, J.H.; Vrtacnik-Bokal, E.; Siegelaar, S.E. The Role of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 in Reproduction: From Physiology to Therapeutic Perspective. Hum. Reprod. Update 2019, 25, 504–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Sáinz, N.; González-Navarro, C.J.; Martínez, J.A.; Moreno-Aliaga, M.J. Leptin Signaling as a Therapeutic Target of Obesity. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 2015, 19, 893–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Salazar, J.; Chávez-Castillo, M.; Rojas, J.; Ortega, A.; Nava, M.; Pérez, J.; Rojas, M.; Espinoza, C.; Chacin, M.; Herazo, Y.; et al. Is “Leptin Resistance” Another Key Resistance to Manage Type 2 Diabetes? Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2020, 16, 733–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Su, H.; Jiang, L.; Carter-Su, C.; Rui, L. Glucose Enhances Leptin Signaling through Modulation of AMPK Activity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Pedroso, J.A.B.; Silveira, M.A.; Lima, L.B.; Furigo, I.C.; Zampieri, T.T.; Ramos-Lobo, A.M.; Buonfiglio, D.C.; Teixeira, P.D.S.; Frazão, R.; Donato, J., Jr. Changes in Leptin Signaling by SOCS3 Modulate Fasting-Induced Hyperphagia and Weight Regain in Mice. Endocrinology 2016, 157, 3901–3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Pérez-Pérez, A.; Sánchez-Jiménez, F.; Vilariño-García, T.; Sánchez-Margalet, V. Role of Leptin in Inflammation and Vice Versa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Cerdó, T.; García-Santos, J.A.; Bermúdez, M.G.; Campoy, C. The Role of Probiotics and Prebiotics in the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity. Nutrients 2019, 11, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Calder, P.C. Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Inflammatory Processes. Nutrients 2010, 2, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Franco, J.G.; Dias-Rocha, C.P.; Fernandes, T.P.; Albuquerque Maia, L.; Lisboa, P.C.; Moura, E.G.; Pazos-Moura, C.C.; Trevenzoli, I.H. Resveratrol Treatment Rescues Hyperleptinemia and Improves Hypothalamic Leptin Signaling Programmed by Maternal High-Fat Diet in Rats. Eur. J. Nutr. 2016, 55, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Yan, C.; Yang, Y.; Saito, K.; Xu, P.; Wang, C.; Hinton, A.O., Jr.; Yan, X.; Wu, Q.; Tong, Q.; Elmquist, J.K.; et al. Meta-Chlorophenylpiperazine Enhances Leptin Sensitivity in Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 172, 3510–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Kim, Y.-W.; Kim, J.-Y.; Park, Y.-H.; Park, S.-Y.; Won, K.-C.; Choi, K.-H.; Huh, J.-Y.; Moon, K.-H. Metformin Restores Leptin Sensitivity in High-Fat–Fed Obese Rats With Leptin Resistance. Diabetes 2006, 55, 716–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Choi, Y.-J.; Park, S.-Y.; Kim, J.-Y.; Won, K.-C.; Kim, B.-R.; Son, J.-K.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, Y.-W. Combined Treatment of Betulinic Acid, a PTP1B Inhibitor, with Orthosiphon Stamineus Extract Decreases Body Weight in High-Fat–Fed Mice. J. Med. Food 2013, 16, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Shapiro, A.; Cheng, K.-Y.; Gao, Y.; Seo, D.; Anton, S.; Carter, C.S.; Zhang, Y.; Tumer, N.; Scarpace, P.J. The Act of Voluntary Wheel Running Reverses Dietary Hyperphagia and Increases Leptin Signaling in Ventral Tegmental Area of Aged Obese Rats. Gerontology 2010, 57, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kang, S.; Kim, K.B.; Shin, K.O. Exercise Training Improve Leptin Sensitivity in Peripheral Tissue of Obese Rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 435, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Šišljagić, D.; Blažetić, S.; Heffer, M.; Vranješ Delać, M.; Muller, A. The Interplay of Uterine Health and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2801. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122801

AMA Style

Šišljagić D, Blažetić S, Heffer M, Vranješ Delać M, Muller A. The Interplay of Uterine Health and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review. Biomedicines. 2024; 12(12):2801. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122801

Chicago/Turabian Style

Šišljagić, Dina, Senka Blažetić, Marija Heffer, Mihaela Vranješ Delać, and Andrijana Muller. 2024. "The Interplay of Uterine Health and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review" Biomedicines 12, no. 12: 2801. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122801

APA Style

Šišljagić, D., Blažetić, S., Heffer, M., Vranješ Delać, M., & Muller, A. (2024). The Interplay of Uterine Health and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review. Biomedicines, 12(12), 2801. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122801

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop