Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Next Article in Journal
The Bactericidal Activity of a Novel Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus Isolate Effectively Controls Foodborne Pathogens Campylobacter jejuni and Listeria monocytogenes
Previous Article in Journal
AI Fairness in Data Management and Analytics: A Review on Challenges, Methodologies and Applications
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 18
10.3390/app131810256
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Fast Approach to Optimize Tread Pattern Shape for Tire Noise Reduction

by
Bin Zhu
1,
Debin Hu
1,2,
Fagen Liao
2,
Jiali Chen
1,
Benlong Su
1,3,
Jian Wu
1,3 and
Youshan Wang
1,*
1
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
2
Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310008, China
3
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(18), 10256; https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810256
Submission received: 17 August 2023 / Revised: 4 September 2023 / Accepted: 8 September 2023 / Published: 13 September 2023
Browse Figures
Figure 1
<p>Mechanism of tire noise generation.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>An example of shape generation process by basis vector method. (<b>a</b>) Original shape and basis vectors, (<b>b</b>) synthetic shape at different weighting factors. I, II, III are three shape change vectors.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of tread pattern shape optimization.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Tire noise test in a semi-anechoic chamber. (<b>a</b>) Front view; (<b>b</b>) side view; (<b>c</b>) the test tire; (<b>d</b>) experimental setup in semi-anechoic chamber.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Pattern shape and pitch arrangement of test tire. (<b>a</b>) Pattern geometry of different pitches; (<b>b</b>) pitch sequence around the tire. A, B, C, and D represent four different pitches.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Measured 1/3-octave-band sound pressure levels at various velocities.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>Simulation results of tire footprint profile. (<b>a</b>) Process of calculating excitation force of pattern; (<b>b</b>) footprint of 225/60 R18 at a velocity of 60 km/h on drum; (<b>c</b>) footprint of 205/60 R16 at a velocity of 80 km/h on a flat surface.</p> "> Figure 8
<p>Comparison of predicted and measured 1/3-octave sound pressure (dB(A)) at a velocity of 60 km/h.</p> "> Figure 9
<p>Schematic diagram of pass-by noise experiment.</p> "> Figure 10
<p>Pass-by noise experiment and prediction results of different tread patterns.</p> "> Figure 11
<p>Basis vector shapes for tread pattern optimization. Tread ribs are highlighted by different colors.</p> "> Figure 12
<p>The shapes of the leading edge are described by the parabola equation.</p> "> Figure 13
<p>The objective function of noise optimization.</p> "> Figure 14
<p>Results of pattern shape optimization at different times and at a velocity of 60 km/h.</p> "> Figure 15
<p>Optimized tread pattern images at various weighting factors.</p> "> Figure 16
<p>Results of leading-edge optimization at different times and at a velocity of 60 km/h.</p> "> Figure 17
<p>The optimized shape of the leading edges at a velocity of 60 km/h.</p> ">
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Impact force induced by tread pattern is one of the major mechanisms of tire noise; thus, how to reduce tire impact noise has been an important issue in regard to tire technology. In this paper, the mechanism of tire–pavement interaction noise is briefly described, and a prediction model for pattern noise is proposed. The prediction model was validated with indoor semi-anechoic chamber and pass-by noise experiments. Then, an optimization method for the tread pattern was proposed by using the basis vector method, and the synthetic pattern shape was generated through a linear combination of basis shape vectors. Finally, a novel multi-objective function was proposed, aimed at minimizing the impact noise generated by the tire pattern, and the weight factors of the basis vectors were optimized with a genetic algorithm. The method proposed in this paper can be used to evaluate or improve pattern performance and reduce trial and error in the pattern design stage.

1. Introduction

In the context of modern urbanization, an intricate transportation network serves as a symbol of progress. Convenient transportation options have greatly enriched people’s daily lives. However, noise from the road traffic network spreads throughout the city and seriously affects people’s work, lives, and physical and mental health. According to estimates from Environment Australia, road traffic contributes to over 70% of environmental noise pollution. Tire noise serves as a major contributor to vehicle noise and is a significant source of urban noise pollution, especially at speeds exceeding 50 km/h. According to statistics presented in [1], tire–pavement noise accounts for 75% to 90% of the total noise generated by passenger cars. In recent years, with the development of electric vehicles, people have higher requirements regarding the comfort and silence of vehicles. In the development of low-noise cars, tires are the most important because tire noise accounts for a large part of the total noise [2]. In particular, tire labels institutionalized in the EU show that tire noise is important because it can amplify overall noise levels [3,4].
Tire noise, or tire–pavement interaction noise, is a complex phenomenon influenced by a range of factors [5], such as tread materials, tire structures [6], vehicle dynamics, road conditions, etc. Tire noise is generated by various mechanisms, which can be categorized into two main groups [7]: aero-acoustic and vibration-induced noise. In the former, the sound pressure fluctuation is caused by aerodynamic noise sources, such as aerodynamic effects. In the latter, the sound pressure fluctuation is caused by the vibration of the structure and the interaction with the surrounding air. In general, tire vibrations are regarded as the primary mechanism for generating tire–pavement noise over low- and mid-frequency ranges. These vibrations are induced by time-varying contact forces resulting from the road roughness and tread pattern. Two primary sources of noise can be identified: The first is related to tread pattern grooves and is known as the air pump mechanism, which arises from the variation in groove volume within the contact patch. The second is related to tread blocks and is known as the vibration mechanism, which is caused by the impact and release of tread blocks entering and leaving the contact patch. For the pattern impact mechanism, the local vibration is dominant in the attachment portion of the contact area between the tread and road surface. Evaluating and predicting tire noise has always been a challenge. Indoor and outdoor tire noise experiments, including the pass-by noise experiment, have been considered the most direct methods for investigating tire noise. However, the evaluation of tire noise through experiments is not only costly and time-consuming but also fails to provide sufficient information to the designer at the design stage [8]. In such situations, there is a preference to predict tire noise through efficient numerical analysis methods during the design stage. Analytical approaches or numerical techniques, such as the Finite Element Method [9], boundary element method [10], or computational fluid dynamics method, have become the primary means for tire noise prediction. To achieve an accurate simulation of tire noise, complex tread pattern modeling is necessary, and the simulation calculation takes a long time [11]. The tread model needs to be rebuilt every time the tread pattern is modified, which greatly increases the modeling cost.
The potential health benefits of noise abatement can be found in the literature [12]. In general, tire-noise-reduction strategies can be separated into three categories [13]: noise control at the noise source, along the transmission path, and at the receiver. To mitigate tire noise, numerous attempts have been made to reduce tire–pavement interaction noise at the source and to ensure a lasting effect [14,15,16,17,18], including the implementation of noise barriers or shields and quiet pavement [19,20]. The former reduces noise mainly through sound absorption and sound insulation, and the latter mainly reduces noise by reducing the reflection and propagation of sound on the pavement, as well as by reducing the generation of sound. Compared with noise barriers or shields, quiet pavement might not be a viable option to mitigate traffic noise because the pavement can wear out and become louder with time [14]. Furthermore, the construction and maintenance costs of pavement are also quite expensive. Thus, controlling tire–pavement interaction noise at its source, i.e., quiet tires, can be a more economical and effective approach. In the tire industry, a number of design concepts to reduce tire noise have been considered [21,22,23], including tire tread [24], tread pattern, tire cavity [25], tire structure, and rims [26]. However, sound-absorbing materials attached inside the tire cavity to reduce the cavity resonance noise might be the most successful so far. Among all of the strategies for reducing tire noise, the tread pattern is considered to be the easiest to modify [27]. In the literature [28], two approaches have been proposed to reduce the tire noise related to the tread pattern. One is meant to disperse tire noise energy over a broad frequency range, which can be achieved by using variable pitches and randomly arranging them around the tire [16,29,30]. The second method reduces the exciting force caused by the discontinuity of the tread block in the direction of tire rotation. In this case, engineers have to modify the pattern’s geometric design. Nevertheless, the automatic generation of a pattern that fulfills the performance requirements poses a significant challenge.
The mathematical representation of the tread pattern is challenging due to its complex structure. In [31], a method was developed to parameterize the pattern geometry, involving over 11 parameters to describe the pattern in detail. Recently, researchers have explored the interaction between the optimal tire profile and tread pattern design by employing the basis vector method [32]. An advantage of the basis vector method lies in its capability to effectively describe complex geometric structures using only a few parameters. Another advantage of this method is that the design engineers can incorporate their design ideas into the basis vector shape [33]. The capability to predict and reduce tread pattern noise will help improve tread pattern design. The contribution of this study is the development of a new optimization method related to tread patterns for tire noise reduction.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews the mechanism of tire noise, and a pattern impact noise prediction model based on pitch noise theory [34] is established. Section 3 describes the details of the synthesis method of pattern shape based on the basis vector method. Section 4 outlines the optimization process based on the genetic algorithm. The prediction method is verified by semi-anechoic chamber and pass-by noise experiments. Then, the optimization results of the tread pattern and leading edge are discussed in Section 5. Section 6 concludes the paper.

2. Tire–Pavement Interaction Noise

2.1. Mechanism of Tire Pattern Noise

When a patterned tire rolls on a flat surface, the impact and release of the tread blocks on the pavement cause the vibration of the tire belt and tread surface, generating noise. Due to the high damping of the rubber material, these vibrational waves primarily remain concentrated near the impact area and do not propagate far. Consequently, acoustic sources located near the contact path are then amplified by the tire–pavement geometry, resulting in far-field noise, as shown in Figure 1. Finally, it is transmitted to the human ear through the air, resulting in perceptible noise.
Tire noise is generated by various mechanisms, including tire surface vibration and the noise associated with aerodynamics, which are discussed in [35]. In general, tire surface vibration can be explained by the excitation force, transfer function, and acoustic field. The former is primarily affected by the tread pattern design, while the transfer function is related to tire structure, material, and boundary conditions. The transfer function can be mathematically represented as follows:
H i j ( f ) = X i j ( f ) F i j ( f )
where Hij(f) is the vibration response transfer function in the frequency domain, being related to the tire structural design and material composition. Fij(f) and Xij(f) are the inputs of the exciting force and the response of vibration, respectively. Generally, Xij(f) can be the displacement, velocity, or acceleration of the vibration. For a patterned tire, Fij is mainly influenced by the tread pattern geometry and distribution on the tread. If we ignore the transfer characteristics of tires, that is, Hij is constant, and Equation (1) can be simplified as:
X p i j F p i j = c o n s t
where [Xp] and [Fp] are the vibration response of the tread surface and exciting force on the tread pattern. Equation (2) shows that the vibration response of the tread surface is directly proportional to the input force.

2.2. Prediction Model of Tire Pattern Noise

Tire pattern noise is mainly generated by the interaction between the tread pattern and the road surface. The leading and trailing edges play a significant role in tread noise generation. At the leading edge, noise is mainly generated due to the impact between the tread blocks and road surface when the blocks enter the contact patch, and the vibrations are excited by time-varying impact forces. The vibration wave does not propagate very far because of tread rubber’s high damping property. For the trailing edge, the noise generation mechanism is similar to that at the leading edge. These patterns located in the contact area cause minimal vibration due to their strong adhesion to the road surface. In this study, the vibration caused by the adhesion between these blocks and the road surface is negligible.
As described in Section 2.1, the relationship between sound pressure and impact force can be expressed as [36]:
p ∝ a ∝ F
where a is the acceleration of the tread element, and it relates to the tread impact force at the leading edge, which is necessary for predicting tire noise. Here, the impact force (forcing function) is derived from the discrete impact of each tread element on the pavement. These repeated impacts induce vibrations, which propagate through the air and surrounding structure, resulting in noise. However, accurately calculating the impact force for an actual commercial patterned tire is a significant challenge. Therefore, it is assumed that a pulse is generated when the tread blocks make contact with the road surface. On the contrary, no force is generated by the tread voids or grooves. Accordingly, the force function can be described as follows:
F ( x , y ) = γ ( x , y ) δ ( x , y )
where γ ( x , y ) is the amplitude of the exciting force on the tire tread surface, represented by x, y, and it is related to the tire structure, material, etc. δ is the Dirac delta function, which is written as:
δ ( x , y ) = 0   for   groove 1   for   block
Integrating Equation (4) along the meridian direction of the tire tread, the impact force between the tire and road surface during rolling can be expressed as:
F ( φ ) = ∫ l e a d i n g γ ( x , φ ) ⋅ δ ( x , φ ) d x   for   all   φ = 0 … 2 π
The spectrum of sound pressure in the frequency domain can be expressed as:
F ( t ) = a 0 2 + ∑ n = 1 ∞ ( a n cos n ω t + b n sin n ω t )
where   ω = 2 π / T is the frequency, T is the cycle of rotation, and a n and b n can be expressed by:
a n = 2 T ∑ i = 1 N F ( t ) cos n ω t i b n = 2 T ∑ i = 1 N F ( t ) sin n ω t i
c n = a n 2 + b n 2
where cn is the amplitude for the n-th harmonics calculated using the Fourier transform of the exciting force in Equation (7).

3. Basis Vector Method for Shape Generation

During the early stage of low-noise tire pattern design, tire designers often resort to trial and error to refine the design schemes, which is very time-consuming. Optimization is a highly effective approach for mitigating tire noise and can be considered a viable method. Various structural optimization methods, such as size, shape, and topology optimization, are available for consideration. Because of a tire’s complex geometric structure, which includes ribs, lugs, sipes, and other elements, it is difficult to represent the tread pattern shape mathematically. This study aims to propose a valuable means of designing a tread pattern. The basis vector method [32,37] may be suitable because the optimized shape could be determined by finding the best possible combination of basis vectors. When using the basis vector method, it is necessary to use several slightly different shapes, called basis vectors. The synthetic shape is generated in terms of a linear combination of vectors as follows [33,37]:
G = G 0 + ∑ i = 1 n w i ( G i − G 0 )
where G and G0 are the synthetic and original shapes, respectively, Gi is the i-th basis vector, and wi is the weighting factor. Different shapes and their weighting factors are illustrated in Figure 2b.
As illustrated in Figure 2, the principle of the basis vector method is elucidated. Figure 2a shows the original shape and the basis vector. As the initial shape is a rectangle, base shape I is generated by offsetting the upper edge by 1/2 in the lateral direction, and base shape II is generated by offsetting the left node of the upper boundary along the lateral direction. By reducing the upper-end edge of the shape by one-half along the symmetry axis, base shape III is generated.
Subsequently, the coordinates of the four shapes are arranged in the same order, represented by vectors G0, G1, G2, and G3. G0 is the original vector, while G1, G2, and G3 are the three basis vectors. To generate a new shape, each coordinate of the shape change vector, G1 − G0, G2 − G0, and G3 − G0, is multiplied by a weighting factor: w1, w2, and w3. The new node coordinate vector is then determined as follows:
G = G 0 + w 1 ( G 1 − G 0 ) + w 2 ( G 2 − G 0 ) + w 3 ( G 3 − G 0 )
By changing the design variables w1, w2, and w3, the corresponding node coordinates of the new shape can be calculated directly using Equation (11). Considering that the design variables w1, w2, and w3 are continuous, the number of shapes can be imagined to be infinite. In general, the process of basis vector generation involves the following three steps:
(1)
Create a basis vector Gi based on the original design shape G0.
(2)
Evaluate the correlation between the two shape change vectors vi and vj. Once the base vector is determined, the MAC (Modal Assurance Criterion) value should be calculated [37]:
M A C ( v i , v j ) = ( v i T v j ) 2 ( v i T v j ) ( v i T v j )
where vi is the shape change vectors of two shapes: vi = Gi − G0. The MAC represents a normalized vector dot product with values between 0 and 1. If the MAC = 1, this indicates no correlation between the two vectors. If the MAC = 0, this means that there is a proportional relation, vi = Kvj, between the shape change vectors vi and vj, which suggests that the basis vector needs further modification.
(3)
To obtain a linear combination of vectors, the synthetic shape is derived from Equation (11).

4. Genetic Optimization Algorithm

The genetic algorithm [38] is used to obtain the weighting factors of the basis vector. According to [39], the genetic algorithm is a widely popular search and optimization method for resolving highly intricate problems, which has the capability of producing good-quality solutions. This section presents a novel approach for applying the genetic algorithm to determine the optimal geometry of one tire pitch for low-impact noise. Figure 3 illustrates a flowchart detailing the implementation of the genetic algorithm throughout this study.
Once an initial population of genomes is generated, the genetic evolution of the genome population undergoes a series that includes fitness tests, selection, reproduction, crossover, and mutation [40]. In the optimization algorithm, the optimization results are significantly affected by the objective function. Typically, the optimization problem is defined as follows:
M i n i m i z e : F ( X ) = ( f 1 ( X ) , f 1 ( X ) , … , f n ( x ) ) T S u b j e c t   t o :   g j ( X ) ≤ g j 0     j = 1 , 2 , … , m X i L ≤ X i ≤ X i U     i = 1 , 2 , … , n X = X 1 , X 2 , … , X n
where Fi(X) and gi(X) are the objective and constraint functions. X i L and X i U are the lower and upper bound, respectively, of each design variable. During the pattern design stage, the objective function may be defined as the contact pressure variance, pattern stiffness, or another relevant factor. Generally, F and g can be computed using the Finite Element Method (FEM). However, the direct application of numerical optimization with the FEM demands multiple analyses. The objective function is calculated using the method described in Section 2.

5. Results and Conclusions

5.1. Semi-Anechoic Chamber Noise Experiment

To evaluate the prediction results of tire noise, a tire noise experiment was conducted in a semi-anechoic chamber following the measurement standard GB/T 23789-2016 [41]. The test parameters could be controlled in this chamber, minimizing the impact of external factors on the results. Before testing, the tire was mounted to the rim and was left in the laboratory for over one hour. Then, the tire was installed on the test equipment for the experiment. The M2 microphone was positioned at a distance of 1 m from the tire center and 0.2 m above the ground, as shown in Figure 4b.
In this experiment, a radial passage car tire with a size of 225/60R18 was selected. The testing conditions were an internal tire pressure of 230 kPa and a vertical load of 4640 N. The geometric shape of each pitch is illustrated in Figure 5a. There were four pitches, and the pitch length and pitch numbers are listed in Table 1.
After the test, the tire noise data from microphone M2 were collected under various rolling speed conditions: 60 km/h, 80 km/h, 100 km/h, and 120 km/h; then, the 1/3-octave-band sound pressure levels (dB(A)) were calculated [42].
Figure 6 illustrates the 1/3-octave-band sound pressure level (dB(A)). There is a significant correlation with velocity when the frequency is over 800 Hz. The tire noise mainly comes from the tread block impact, contact area block slip, and pump noise due to the grooves. With the increase in speed, the impact force increases, which results in a higher noise emission. When the frequency is below 800 Hz, the tire noise is mainly caused by structural vibration, including of the carcass cavity and sidewall; this is related to the tire vibration characteristics and exciting force, and there is no obvious correlation between tire velocity and tire noise.

5.2. The Validation of the Tire Noise Prediction Method

In this research, to calculate the tire noise accurately, the footprint profile was calculated using FE software ABAQUS 6.14. The simplified tread pattern was modeled, which has sufficient accuracy in analyzing the tire’s steady state [43]. The tire reinforcement was modeled by the rebar layer, the rubber material was modeled as incompressible hyperelasticity, and the Yeoh constitutive model was used in this simulation. The tire three-dimensional model was generated with symmetrical model generation technology, and the load and inflation pressure are consistent with those of the noise test.
Figure 7b shows the footprint profile of a 225/60 R18 tire at a speed of 60 km/h. In this study, the leading edge of the footprint profile was used. We assume that each pattern element produces a unit pulse, resulting in a weight function that remains constant along the tread meridian direction. Thus, the γ can be simplified to 1.0. The excitation force was obtained by moving the leading edge along the tread pattern, resulting in a total of 2048 data points. The predicted and measured 1/3-octave sound pressure levels (dB(A)) are shown in Figure 8.
It is clear from Figure 8 that the predicted result is in good agreement with the measured noise for frequencies over 800 Hz. In this range, the tire/road noise is primarily determined by the local deformations occurring at the leading and trailing edges of the tire’s footprint; these local deformations arise due to the impact of tread blocks during tire rotation. In contrast to the urban road traffic noise experiment [44], and to further validate the correlation between the experiment results and our prediction of external noise, our study followed the pass-by noise testing process outlined in ECE R117 [45]. During this test, the vehicle was driven along a designated test track following the centerline denoted as C-C in Figure 9, and two target microphones were placed on both sides of the track to measure the noise levels. These microphones were placed in the middle of the track 7.5 m away from the vehicle’s centerline at a height of 1.2 m. Subsequently, the maximum sound pressure level was recorded while the test vehicle was coasting. To obtain the final result for a reference speed, we conducted a linear regression analysis. If the discrepancy between the measurements from the left and right microphones exceeded 1 dB (a), the test result was deemed invalid and necessitated retesting. Finally, the sound pressure level (dB(A)) at a velocity of 80 km/h was calculated.
Four different tread patterns, denoted as A, B, C, and D, were selected for the experiment, while the tire size and structural design of 205/60 R16 were kept the same. Figure 7c shows the contact patch at a speed of 80 km/h. The evaluation results of the pass-by noise experiment are presented in Figure 10 where the predicted results are compared with the measured results. In this analysis, the predicted results were calculated using the 1/3-octave dB(A) range from 800–2000 Hz, which specifically covers the pattern impact noise range. The predicted values agree well with the test noise in terms of overall trends. This level of agreement is highly advantageous, as it facilitates the initial evaluation of pattern design. While the specific values may not match perfectly, this is mainly due to the test results of the pass-by noise experiment being influenced by environmental factors [46], road conditions, and the motion state of vehicles [47]. It is important to note that these measurement outcomes are a culmination of the combination of various mechanisms. In addition, our prediction model does not consider the radiation characteristics [48,49,50] of noise. This could be a plausible explanation for why the predicted value exceeds the observed test value. Nevertheless, the overall trend alignment demonstrates the effectiveness of the prediction model. In order to improve the prediction accuracy, the spatial noise radiation characteristics of the tire and the acoustic interaction between the tread pattern and tire body should be considered.

5.3. GA Optimization of Tread Pattern

5.3.1. Computational Condition

The proposed designs of the basis vector shapes are presented in Figure 11. Constraint conditions for the optimization process are listed in Table 2, which involve the weighting factors of Base 1, Base 2, Base 3, and Base 4. The design variables for the i-th shape are defined as wi.
In general, the leading edge can be defined by a straight line, two arcs [31], or a hyperelliptic equation [51]. For simplicity, the leading edge is described by the parabolic equation:
x 2 = − 2 p y   ( p > 0 )
where x and y are the coordinate values along the tread meridian and longitudinal direction, the parameter p can be obtained from the right-end point of the leading edge, and the maximum width is FW. Figure 12 shows the leading edges of different Yc values. In the process of shape optimization, we set the leading edge to have Yc = 25 mm and FW = 190.5 mm.

5.3.2. The Objective Function

The objective function plays a crucial role in determining the optimization result. According to the literature [52], any reduction in Hij(f) can reduce the radiated noise. An exciting force between the tread pattern and the road that is around its mean value will lead to similar acoustic pressure variations inside the vehicle. According to the literature [28,42,53], a simple measure to quantify this change is the standard deviation; the standard deviation of the tread impact force function is considered to be a measure of the sound pressure level inside the vehicle:
F ˜ S T D = ∫ 0 2 π ( F ˜ ( φ ) − F ˜ m e a n ) 2
where Fmean is the average value of the exciting force. Furthermore, during the collision, the tread block impacts the road and pulsive noise is generated due to the deformation of the tread surface in the radial direction. Acoustic sources located near the contact path are then amplified by the tire–pavement geometry, resulting in far-field noise, which is then perceived by humans. The sound pressure level (SPL) experienced by pedestrians is important [54]. Here, we define the 1/3-octave sound pressure level curve, as shown in Figure 13.
fs and fe are the start and end frequencies, and S is the difference between the area of the original curve and that of the optimized curve. The objective function can be defined as:
F ˜ s p l = max ( S )
When taking both objectives into account, the problem transforms into a multi-objective optimization problem. Generally, two methods can be used to solve multi-objective optimization problems: the Pareto method and the scalarization method [55]. In this study, NSGA-II was applied [56].

5.3.3. Computational Results

Based on the optimization method proposed above, the experimental tire pattern was optimized.
Figure 14 shows the original and optimized results where the noise has been significantly reduced in the target frequency range. It can be seen from the results that the tread pattern shape optimization is effective at reducing noise above 500 Hz. The low-frequency component of the pattern impact is mainly transmitted to the interior of the vehicle through the suspension system, which causes the vibration of the vehicle structures. In this paper, only pattern noise was considered, and low-frequency components were reduced by modifying the objective function.
The reduced values at each target frequency are 6.4 dB(A), 9.22 dB(A), 9.08 dB(A), 7.79 dB(A), and 6.55 dB(A), and the maximum reduction rate is 12.1% at the frequency of 1250 Hz. These specific values may differ from those of the experiment. This is mainly because the acoustic radiation characteristics and the coupling effect between the pattern blocks and tire body are not considered in our prediction model. However, these values can provide us with a reference to improve our design sketch in the pattern design stage.
In terms of optimization time, it takes only 5.5 s to obtain the first optimization solution and only 76 s to produce the final result. Different from regression methods, which include the support vector machine (SVM), relevance vector machine (RVM), ANN [57], and convolutional neural network (CNN) [58] (the RVM, ANN, and CNN take 66,297, 32,428, and 205,694 s for data training [59]), the optimization method proposed in this paper does not need to collect and train data. In addition, there are fewer parameters for pattern parameterization [31]. Last but not least, engineers’ design ideas can be integrated into the design of basis vector shapes.
The optimized pattern shapes are shown in Figure 15. The standard deviations of the exciting force of the original and optimized patterns are 2.62, 2.03, 2.00, and 1.99. The optimized pattern has lower variance and a better Sound Quality Preference Index [53]. Compared with other methods presented in the literature [31], the proposed method, which is based on the linear combination of the basis vector shapes, has fewer optimization parameters when needing to change the pattern shape.

5.4. Optimization of Footprint Leading Edge

5.4.1. The Process for Optimization of Leading Edge

The tire–pavement noise is influenced not only by the exciting force from the tread pattern but also significantly by the shape of the leading edge [22]. In the stage of pattern design, a well-designed pattern should exhibit superior performance over various footprint contours, which is a challenging task. Once the pattern design scheme is determined, the most suitable contact patch should be determined.
The contact patch can be controlled by the tire structure [60]. In this subsection, we further discuss the optimization of the leading edge to reduce pattern noise. The leading edge is described in the same way as in Section 5.3.1 where the equation coefficients are determined by the Yc coordinate on the right end. In the optimization process, the leading edge where Yc = −25 mm was selected as the original design scheme. The design variable was the y coordinate on the right end of the leading edge, which ranges from −50 mm to 0 mm.

5.4.2. Result of Optimization of Leading Edge

Figure 16 shows the 1/3-octave result of the optimized leading edges where a result similar to that of the pattern optimization was obtained. The reduced values at each target frequency are 5.19 dB(A), 4.40 dB(A), 4.88 dB(A), 4.56 dB(A), and 3.01 dB(A) within the optimized target frequency of 800–2000 Hz. The maximum reduction rate is 7.02% at the frequency of 800 Hz. Under similar time conditions, the pattern shape optimization has a higher reduction effect and takes less time.
The optimized shape of the leading edge is shown in Figure 17. It can be seen from the results that the leading edge has a significant effect on pattern noise, as reported in the literature [31], and the change in footprint shape may have an impact on other tire properties. This suggests that for a certain tread pattern, the leading edge should maintain minimal change under various conditions for a better tire noise performance.

6. Conclusions

This paper aimed to contribute to reducing tire pattern impact noise. The tire pattern noise prediction method was introduced and validated through indoor anechoic chambers and pass-by noise experiments. Then, the pattern shape optimization method was proposed, and the pattern shape was generated using the basis vector method. Finally, the potential of leading edge and pattern shape optimization to reduce pattern noise was discussed.
The main conclusions of this work are summarized below:
1.
A predictive model for tire–pavement interaction noise was developed, and noise experiments were conducted in a semi-anechoic chamber by measuring pass-by noise. The prediction results are in good agreement with the experiment results above 800 Hz.
2.
The basis vector method was applied to generate complex tire pattern structures. The new pattern shape was synthesized with linear weighting parameters among these base shapes, and it was found that the optimization parameters can be reduced by this method.
3.
The novel multi-objective function that was proposed aims to minimize the impact noise generated by the tire pattern. The optimization parameters were obtained using a genetic algorithm. This method can be used to improve the design scheme at the pattern design stage.
4.
Noise can be reduced through optimization of the pattern shape or leading edge, but changing the pattern may be a better choice when considering other performance factors.
In summary, the tire noise prediction and optimization method proposed in this paper offers the potential to effectively reduce noise, minimize trial and error costs in the early stage of pattern design, and significantly enhance development efficiency. However, low noise is a tire design criterion that may conflict with other objectives [61], such as wet traction, handling, hydroplaning, or safety. For example, when considering the wet skid performance of a tire, the water flow characteristics around a tire are largely influenced by lateral grooves [62]. The model proposed in [63] can be used to determine the parameters of the tread pattern, such as the width and angle of the lateral groove, for better wet skid performance. By keeping these parameters with minimal changes in each base shape vector, the optimization tread pattern can combine maximum safety with the lowest noise level.
In addition, compared to traditional fuel vehicles, electric vehicles (Evs) have lower engine noise and lower inlet and exhaust noise, and the tire–pavement interaction noise is the main source of vehicle noise at higher velocities [64]. The motion states of Evs (i.e., the constant speed state, the acceleration state, and the deceleration state) have a significant influence on vehicle noise [47]. When considering the optimization of Ev noise, several crucial steps must be followed. Firstly, it is essential to accurately determine the real leading edge through experiments or Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations at various motion states. Secondly, the obtained real leading edge should be used in the optimization process, as demonstrated in Figure 3. Subsequently, the objective function for reducing electric vehicle noise should be established by Equations (15) and (16) at each motion state. Finally, the optimization process of Ev noise can be carried out by employing the method proposed in this research.

Author Contributions

Methodology, B.Z.; data curation, D.H. and F.L.; software, B.Z. and J.C.; writing—review and editing, B.Z., B.S. and J.W.; funding acquisition, Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52075119) and the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51790502).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to G. J. Kim and Zhibo Cui for their help and suggestions in the implementation of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gibbs, D.C.; Iwasaki, R.; Bernhard, R.; Bledsoe, J.; Carlson, D.; Corbisier, C.; Fults, K.; Hearne, T., Jr.; McMullen, K.; Newcomb, D. Quiet Pavement Systems in Europe; Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
  2. Lelong, J. Vehicle noise emission: Evaluation of tyre/road and motor-noise contributions. In Proceedings of the 1999 International Congress on Noise Control Engineering(Inter Noise 99), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 6–8 December 1999; pp. 203–208. [Google Scholar]
  3. Klein, A.; Marquis-Favre, C.; Weber, R.; Trollé, A. Spectral and modulation indices for annoyance-relevant features of urban road single-vehicle pass-by noises. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2015, 137, 1238–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kumar, A.; Mondal, P.; Vijay, P.; Bhangale, U.; Tyagi, D. Comparative study of sound absorption coefficients on different types of road surfaces using non-destructive method as per ISO 13472-2: 2010. Phys. Sci. Int. J. 2011, 1, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kropp, W.; Larsson, K.; Barrelet, S. The influence of belt and tread band stiffness on the tire noise generation mechanisms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103, 2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, T. Influencing parameters on tire–pavement interaction noise: Review, experiments, and design considerations. Designs 2018, 2, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, B.; Wang, Y.-S. Tire Noise Prediction through 2D Tread Pattern Design. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2437, 012069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cho, J.-R.; Lee, H.-W.; Jeong, W.-B. Numerical simulation of radiation noise of 3-D smooth tire using the rebound excitation force at the bending front. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2017, 31, 3371–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, Y.; Feng, X.; Fuqiang, Z.; Xiang, D. Simulation of rolling noise based on the mixed Lagrangian-Eulerian method. Tire Sci. Technol. 2016, 44, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, G.; Zhou, H.; Mao, Z.; Gao, L. Boundary element analysis of rolling tire noise. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Transportation, Mechanical, and Electrical Engineering, TMEE 2011, Changchun, China, 16–18 December 2011; pp. 1970–1973. [Google Scholar]
  11. Saraswat, A.; Oorath, R.; Patel, C.; Ghosh, A.; Goyal, S.; Thomas, J.; George, J.; Nair, S.; Issac, R. Tyre-Road Interaction Noise Prediction: A Simulation-Based Approach. In Proceedings of the SAE 12th International Styrian Noise, Vibration and Harshness Congress: The European Automotive Noise Conference, SNVH 2022, Graz, Austria, 22–24 June 2022. [Google Scholar]
  12. Commission, E.; Environment, D.-G.F.; Kantor, E.; Klebba, M.; Richer, C.; Kubota, U.; Zeisl, Y.; Dittrich, M.; Blanes Guardia, N.; Fons Estevez, J.; et al. Assessment of Potential Health Benefits of Noise Abatement Measures in the EU—Phenomena Project—Executive Summary; Publications Office: Luxembourg, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chin, W.; See, K.; Ng, Y.; Gan, J.; Lim, S.; Energy; Environment, P.I. Technologies for Indoor Noise Attenuation: A Short Review. Prog. Energy Environ. 2019, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, T. Literature review of tire-pavement interaction noise and reduction approaches. J. Vibroeng. 2018, 20, 2424–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, X.-h.; Guo, B.; Yang, H.-y. Application of tread patterns noise-reduction based on fuzzy genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of Fuzzy Information and Engineering Volume 2; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 1141–1148. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, E.-Y.; Hwang, S.-W.; Lee, S.-K. Image-based approach to optimize the tyre pitch sequence for a reduction in the air-pumping noise based on a genetic algorithm. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 2012, 226, 1171–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, E.-Y.; Hwang, S.-W.; Kim, B.-H.; Lee, S.-K. Reduction of Air-pumping Noise based on a Genetic Algorithm. Trans. Korean Soc. Noise Vib. Eng. 2012, 22, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Becker, M.; Ginoux, N.; Martin, S.; Róka, Z. Tire Noise Optimization Problem: A Mixed Integer Linear Program Approach. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1809.05058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sandberg, U. Tyre/Road Noise: Myths and Realities; Statens väg-och transportforskningsinstitut: Linköping, Sweden, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ling, S.; Yu, F.; Sun, D.; Sun, G.; Xu, L. A comprehensive review of tire-pavement noise: Generation mechanism, measurement methods, and quiet asphalt pavement. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 287, 125056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, J.; Xia, Q.; Zhou, H.-C.; Wang, G.-L. Noise reduction mechanism of truck radial tire based on modified carcass string contour design. Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban)/J. Jilin Univ. (Eng. Technol. Ed.) 2021, 51, 1198–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Iwao, K.; Yamazaki, I. A study on the mechanism of tire/road noise. JSAE Rev. 1996, 17, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, G.; Wang, L.; Zhu, K.; Jian, Y.; Bo, L. Multi-coupled biomimetics for tire noise reduction. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 2023, 09544070231173184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yoon, B.; Kim, J.; Kang, C.; Oh, M.K.; Hong, U.; Suhr, J. Experimental and numerical investigation on the effect of material models of tire tread composites in rolling tire noise via coupled acoustic-structural finite element analysis. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2023, 32, 501–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mohamed, Z.; Wang, X.; Jazar, R. A survey of wheel tyre cavity resonance noise. Int. J. Veh. Noise Vib. 2013, 9, 276–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mohamed, Z.; Wang, X. A study of tyre cavity resonance and noise reduction using inner trim. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2015, 50, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pope, J.; Reynolds, W.C. Tire Noise Generation: The Roles of Tire and Road; SAE Technical Paper; SAE: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1976; ISSN 0148-7191. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, G.; Cho, S.; Kim, N. Prediction of the tread pattern noise of the quasi-static state rolling tyre. In Proceedings of the 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering, Nice, France, 27–31 August 2000. [Google Scholar]
  29. Williams, T.A. Tire Tread Pattern Noise Reduction through the Application of Pitch Sequencing; SAE Technical Paper; SAE: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1995; ISSN 0148-7191. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ejsmont, J. Tire/road noise simulation for optimization of the tread pattern. In Proceedings of the Internoise 2000, 29th international Congress on Noise Control Engineering, Nice, France, 27–31 August 2000. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mundl, R.; Fischer, M.; Strache, W.; Wiese, K.; Wies, B.; Zinken, K.-H. Virtual pattern optimization based on performance prediction tools. Tire Sci. Technol. 2008, 36, 192–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tanaka, Y.; Ohishi, K. Unified Approach to Optimization of Tread Pattern Shape and Cross-Sectional Contour of Tires. Tire Sci. Technol. 2010, 38, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fukushima, J.; Kobayashi, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Otsubo, Y.; Kurumatani, K. Development of Shape Optimization Technique Based on The Basis Vector Method; SAE Technical Paper; SAE: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1995; ISSN 0148-7191. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nakajima, Y. Theory on pitch noise and its application. J. Vib. Acoust. Trans. ASME 2003, 125, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Heckl, M. Tyre noise generation. Wear 1986, 113, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tsujiuchi, N.; Masuda, A.; Seki, H.; Takahashi, H. Developing evaluation model of Tire pattern impact noise. In Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Hamburg, Germany, 21–24 August 2016; pp. 1315–1325. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, X. Shape optimum design by basis vector method considering partial shape dependence. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cho, J.R.; Lee, J.H.; Jeong, K.M.; Kim, K.W. Optimum design of run-flat tire insert rubber by genetic algorithm. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2012, 52, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Albadr, M.A.; Tiun, S.; Ayob, M.; Al-Dhief, F. Genetic algorithm based on natural selection theory for optimization problems. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sampson, J.R. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems (John H. Holland). Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 1976, 18, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. GB/T 32789-2016; Tire noise test method drum method. China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Federation: Beijing, China, 2016.
  42. Liao, Z.; Gan, Z.; Hu, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, B.; Zhang, J. Comparative study of two typical one-third octave algorithms in substation noise analysis. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Korunović, N.; Trajanović, M.; Stojković, M.; Vitković, N.; Trifunović, M.; Milovanović, J. Detailed vs. simplified tread tire model for steady-state rolling analysis. Stroj. Časopis Teor. Praksu Stroj. 2012, 54, 153–160. [Google Scholar]
  44. Moreno, R.; Bianco, F.; Carpita, S.; Monticelli, A.; Fredianelli, L.; Licitra, G. Adjusted Controlled Pass-By (CPB) Method for Urban Road Traffic Noise Assessment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. No E R. 117. Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Tyres with Regard to Rolling Sound Emissions and to Adhesion on Wet Surfaces and/or to Rolling Resistance; E/ECE/324/Rev. 2/Add. 116/Rev. 2−E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev. 2/Add. 116/Rev. 2: 2011; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  46. Yum, K.; Hong, K.; Bolton, J.S. Influence of Tire Size and Shape on Sound Radiation from a Tire in the Mid-Frequency Region; SAE Transactions: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 1801–1807. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lan, Z.; Yuan, M.; Shao, S.; Li, F. Noise emission models of electric vehicles considering speed, acceleration, and motion state. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oshino, Y.; Tachibana, H. Noise source identification on rolling tires by sound intensity measurement. J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. (E) 1991, 12, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vasilyev, A. About the approaches to mathematical description and calculation of tire road noise radiation. Akustika 2019, 32, 97–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wright, C.; Koopmann, G. A technique to predict the acoustic radiation characteristics of an automobile tire. Tire Sci. Technol. 1986, 14, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hallonborg, U. Super ellipse as tyre-ground contact area. J. Terramechanics 1996, 33, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Richards, E.; Stimpson, G. On the Prediction of Impact Noise, Part IX: The noise from punch presses. J. Sound Vib. 1985, 103, 43–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bekke, D.; Wijnant, Y.; De Boer, A.; Bezemer-Krijnen, M. Tyre tread pattern noise optimization by a coupled source-human perception model. In Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Melbourne, Australia, 16–19 November 2014; pp. 6173–6180. [Google Scholar]
  54. Leupolz, M.; Gauterin, F. Vehicle Impact on Tire Road Noise and Validation of an Algorithm to Virtually Change Tires. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. De Weck, O.L. Multiobjective optimization: History and promise. In Proceedings of the Invited Keynote Paper, GL2-2, The Third China-Japan-Korea Joint Symposium on Optimization of Structural and Mechanical Systems, Kanazawa, Japan, 30 October–2 November 2004; p. 34. [Google Scholar]
  56. Blank, J.; Deb, K. Pymoo: Multi-objective optimization in python. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 89497–89509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Spies, L.; Li, T.; Burdisso, R.; Sandu, C. An artificial neural network (ANN) approach to model Tire-Pavement interaction noise (TPIN) based on tire noise separation. Appl. Acoust. 2023, 206, 109294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lee, S.-K.; Lee, H.; Back, J.; An, K.; Yoon, Y.; Yum, K.; Kim, S.; Hwang, S.-U. Prediction of tire pattern noise in early design stage based on convolutional neural network. Appl. Acoust. 2021, 172, 107617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mohammadi, S.; Ohadi, A.; Irannejad-Parizi, M. A comprehensive study on statistical prediction and reduction of tire/road noise. J. Vib. Control 2022, 28, 2487–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Y.; Cui, Z.; Wu, J.; Su, B.; Zhao, J. An improved method of using equilibrium profile to design radial tires. J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf. 2015, 9, JAMDSM0018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mohammadi, S.; Ohadi, A. A novel approach to design quiet tires, based on multi-objective minimization of generated noise. Appl. Acoust. 2021, 175, 107825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, H.; Jiang, Z.; Jiang, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, G.; Qian, H. Optimization of tire tread pattern based on flow characteristics to improve hydroplaning resistance. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 2020, 234, 2961–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, X.; Cao, Q.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Huang, X. Evaluation of vehicle braking performance on wet pavement surface using an integrated tire-vehicle modeling approach. Transport Res. Rec. 2019, 2673, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cesbron, J.; Bianchetti, S.; Pallas, M.-A.; Le Bellec, A.; Gary, V.; Klein, P. Road surface influence on electric vehicle noise emission at urban speed. Noise Mapp. 2021, 8, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 13 10256 g001
Figure 1. Mechanism of tire noise generation.
Figure 1. Mechanism of tire noise generation.
Applsci 13 10256 g001
Applsci 13 10256 g002
Figure 2. An example of shape generation process by basis vector method. (a) Original shape and basis vectors, (b) synthetic shape at different weighting factors. I, II, III are three shape change vectors.
Figure 2. An example of shape generation process by basis vector method. (a) Original shape and basis vectors, (b) synthetic shape at different weighting factors. I, II, III are three shape change vectors.
Applsci 13 10256 g002
Applsci 13 10256 g003
Figure 3. Flowchart of tread pattern shape optimization.
Figure 3. Flowchart of tread pattern shape optimization.
Applsci 13 10256 g003
Applsci 13 10256 g004
Figure 4. Tire noise test in a semi-anechoic chamber. (a) Front view; (b) side view; (c) the test tire; (d) experimental setup in semi-anechoic chamber.
Figure 4. Tire noise test in a semi-anechoic chamber. (a) Front view; (b) side view; (c) the test tire; (d) experimental setup in semi-anechoic chamber.
Applsci 13 10256 g004
Applsci 13 10256 g005
Figure 5. Pattern shape and pitch arrangement of test tire. (a) Pattern geometry of different pitches; (b) pitch sequence around the tire. A, B, C, and D represent four different pitches.
Figure 5. Pattern shape and pitch arrangement of test tire. (a) Pattern geometry of different pitches; (b) pitch sequence around the tire. A, B, C, and D represent four different pitches.
Applsci 13 10256 g005
Applsci 13 10256 g006
Figure 6. Measured 1/3-octave-band sound pressure levels at various velocities.
Figure 6. Measured 1/3-octave-band sound pressure levels at various velocities.
Applsci 13 10256 g006
Applsci 13 10256 g007
Figure 7. Simulation results of tire footprint profile. (a) Process of calculating excitation force of pattern; (b) footprint of 225/60 R18 at a velocity of 60 km/h on drum; (c) footprint of 205/60 R16 at a velocity of 80 km/h on a flat surface.
Figure 7. Simulation results of tire footprint profile. (a) Process of calculating excitation force of pattern; (b) footprint of 225/60 R18 at a velocity of 60 km/h on drum; (c) footprint of 205/60 R16 at a velocity of 80 km/h on a flat surface.
Applsci 13 10256 g007
Applsci 13 10256 g008
Figure 8. Comparison of predicted and measured 1/3-octave sound pressure (dB(A)) at a velocity of 60 km/h.
Figure 8. Comparison of predicted and measured 1/3-octave sound pressure (dB(A)) at a velocity of 60 km/h.
Applsci 13 10256 g008
Applsci 13 10256 g009
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of pass-by noise experiment.
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of pass-by noise experiment.
Applsci 13 10256 g009
Applsci 13 10256 g010
Figure 10. Pass-by noise experiment and prediction results of different tread patterns.
Figure 10. Pass-by noise experiment and prediction results of different tread patterns.
Applsci 13 10256 g010
Applsci 13 10256 g011
Figure 11. Basis vector shapes for tread pattern optimization. Tread ribs are highlighted by different colors.
Figure 11. Basis vector shapes for tread pattern optimization. Tread ribs are highlighted by different colors.
Applsci 13 10256 g011
Applsci 13 10256 g012
Figure 12. The shapes of the leading edge are described by the parabola equation.
Figure 12. The shapes of the leading edge are described by the parabola equation.
Applsci 13 10256 g012
Applsci 13 10256 g013
Figure 13. The objective function of noise optimization.
Figure 13. The objective function of noise optimization.
Applsci 13 10256 g013
Applsci 13 10256 g014
Figure 14. Results of pattern shape optimization at different times and at a velocity of 60 km/h.
Figure 14. Results of pattern shape optimization at different times and at a velocity of 60 km/h.
Applsci 13 10256 g014
Applsci 13 10256 g015
Figure 15. Optimized tread pattern images at various weighting factors.
Figure 15. Optimized tread pattern images at various weighting factors.
Applsci 13 10256 g015
Applsci 13 10256 g016
Figure 16. Results of leading-edge optimization at different times and at a velocity of 60 km/h.
Figure 16. Results of leading-edge optimization at different times and at a velocity of 60 km/h.
Applsci 13 10256 g016
Applsci 13 10256 g017
Figure 17. The optimized shape of the leading edges at a velocity of 60 km/h.
Figure 17. The optimized shape of the leading edges at a velocity of 60 km/h.
Applsci 13 10256 g017
Table 1. Parameters of pitch sequence.
Table 1. Parameters of pitch sequence.
Pitch TypePitch Len. (mm)Pitch No.Pitch Sequence
A45.2310DCDDC AABBC ABDDC ABCDB AABAA BDDCD BDCBC CAACB D
B51.8510
C58.4710
D65.0811
Table 2. Constraint conditions.
Table 2. Constraint conditions.
Design variableBase 1Base 2Base 3Base 4
Range of design variables (wi)−0.4~2.0−0.5~4.0−2.0~2.0−0.8~1.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, B.; Hu, D.; Liao, F.; Chen, J.; Su, B.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y. A Fast Approach to Optimize Tread Pattern Shape for Tire Noise Reduction. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10256. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810256

AMA Style

Zhu B, Hu D, Liao F, Chen J, Su B, Wu J, Wang Y. A Fast Approach to Optimize Tread Pattern Shape for Tire Noise Reduction. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(18):10256. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810256

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Bin, Debin Hu, Fagen Liao, Jiali Chen, Benlong Su, Jian Wu, and Youshan Wang. 2023. "A Fast Approach to Optimize Tread Pattern Shape for Tire Noise Reduction" Applied Sciences 13, no. 18: 10256. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810256

APA Style

Zhu, B., Hu, D., Liao, F., Chen, J., Su, B., Wu, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). A Fast Approach to Optimize Tread Pattern Shape for Tire Noise Reduction. Applied Sciences, 13(18), 10256. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810256

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop