Investigating the Rhizosphere Fungal Communities of Healthy and Root-Rot-Infected Lycium barbarum in the Tsaidam Basin, China
<p>(<b>A</b>) represents the sampling sites of <span class="html-italic">L. barbarum</span>; (<b>B</b>) depicts leaves exhibiting wilted conditions; (<b>C</b>) illustrates the stems in contact with the ground, which have been excavated to inspect for swelling; (<b>D</b>) contrasts the root systems of healthy plants (H) with those of infected plants (D); (<b>E</b>) shows the post-fruiting performance of the infected plants; and (<b>F</b>) displays the outcomes of the healthy plants.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>The analysis of soil physicochemical properties, where (<b>A</b>) is total nitrogen (TN), (<b>B</b>) is total potassium (TK), (<b>C</b>) is total phosphorus (TP), (<b>D</b>) is soil organic matter (SOM), (<b>E</b>) is alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen (AN), (<b>F</b>) is available phosphorus (AP), (<b>G</b>) is available potassium (AK), and (<b>H</b>) is pH values. Letters indicate significant differences among different soil samples by ANOVA at <span class="html-italic">p</span> * < 0.05, <span class="html-italic">p</span> ** < 0.01 vs. H group (n = 17 in each group). H is healthy samples; D is diseased samples.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) The OTU distribution Venn diagram; (<b>B</b>) The saturation of rarefaction curves; (<b>C</b>) The Observed Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs); (<b>D</b>) The Chao1 richness index; (<b>E</b>) Simpson’s diversity index; (<b>F</b>) The Shannon-Wiener diversity index. Utilizing Illumina sequencing technology, Venn diagram is at a 97% sequence similarity threshold, and the OTU distribution Venn diagram shows that the D group harbored 830 unique OTUs, accounting for 32.07% of the total, while the H group had 1112 unique OTUs, comprising 42.97% of the total. Only 646 OTUs were shared between the two groups, representing 24.96% of the total. These data clearly indicate a higher fungal richness in the H group compared to the D group. The rarity curve saturation in (<b>B</b>) suggests that the sequencing depth was sufficient to capture the full spectrum of fungal community diversity in the rhizospheric soil. Consequently, these findings are deemed to accurately represent the actual state of the fungal communities and are suitable for further analysis. (<b>C</b>–<b>F</b>) illustrate the alpha diversity of the soil fungal communities within each sample, evaluated by multiple metrics, including the number of observed OTUs, the Chao1 richness index, the Simpson diversity index, and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index. Notably, significant differences were found between the D and H groups for all indices, with the H soils exhibiting a higher level of diversity than the D soils. * indicate significant differences among different soil samples by ANOVA at <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05, ** indicate significant differences among different soil samples by ANOVA at <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>): Variation in microbial abundance at the phylum and genus levels; (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>): H and D microbes with differential abundance at the phylum and genus levels. (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>) collectively illustrate the composition and relative abundance of the fungal community in the rhizospheric soil of wolfberry. (<b>A</b>) reveals the distribution of over nine distinct fungal phyla, with Ascomycota being the predominant group, averaging a 74.78% abundance, followed by Zygomycota, Basidiomycota, and Chytridiomycota. (<b>C</b>) discloses significant differences in the fungal communities between healthy (H) and root-rot (D) samples, where the abundance of Ascomycota increased by 10.43% in the D samples, while the abundance of Basidiomycota and Glomeromycota significantly decreased. (<b>B</b>,<b>D</b>) further analyze the distribution of fungal genera, with 332 genera exhibiting significant changes under different treatments; a higher abundance of <span class="html-italic">Plectosphaerella</span>, <span class="html-italic">Mortierella</span>, <span class="html-italic">Kotlabaea</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Neonectria</span> was observed in healthy samples, whereas the abundance of <span class="html-italic">Embellisia</span> and <span class="html-italic">Alternaria</span> significantly increased in D samples. These findings indicate that root rot significantly alters the structure of the fungal community in the rhizospheric soil, exerting a substantial impact on agricultural production. ** indicate significant differences among different soil samples by ANOVA at <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Relative abundances of fungal classes in rhizosphere soil samples. NMDS analysis (<b>A</b>), coupled with LEfSe analysis (<b>B</b>), has elucidated significant distinctions in the fungal communities of the rhizosphere soil between healthy (H) and root-rot infected (D) in <span class="html-italic">L. barbarum</span> plants. The NMDS analysis revealed a notable differentiation in the fungal community structure between the two groups, with a stress value of 0.17, indicating statistically significant results. The fungal communities in the healthy plants exhibited greater consistency, whereas those in the infected plants were more dispersed. The LEfSe analysis further revealed significant differences in the relative abundance and distribution of fungi at the phylum, class, family, and genus levels between the H and D soil samples. Notably, the H samples registered higher LDA scores for Basidiomycota, Glomeromycota, Eurotiomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Chytridiomycetes, and Glomeromycetes, whereas the D samples were enriched with Dothideomycetes, Cucurbitariaceae, and Pleosporaceae. At the genus level, the H samples were characterized by the highest LDA scores for <span class="html-italic">Phoma</span>, <span class="html-italic">Bionectria</span>, <span class="html-italic">Neonectria</span>, <span class="html-italic">Plectosphaerella</span>, <span class="html-italic">Verticillium</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Glomus</span>, while the D samples were distinguished by the prominence of <span class="html-italic">Pyrenochaeta</span>, <span class="html-italic">Didymella</span>, <span class="html-italic">Alternaria</span>, <span class="html-italic">Embellisia</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Phaeomycocentrospora</span>.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>RDA of chemical properties and fungal communities in rhizosphere soils. RDA collectively elucidates the influence of soil chemical properties on the fungal community structure in the rhizosphere soil of <span class="html-italic">L. barbarum</span>. The RDA revealed that chemical attributes such as total nitrogen (TN), soil organic matter (SOM), and total phosphorus (TP) significantly affect the relative abundance of fungal genera, with TN emerging as a predominant influencing factor, positively correlating with the microbial communities associated with healthy plants. Conversely, pH exerted a pivotal impact on the distribution of fungi in the rhizosphere of diseased plants.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>The predicted trophic mode and subguilds bar graph by FUNguild (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and Network diagram of fungal taxonomic trophic model interactions by cytoscape (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>). In (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), we have evaluated the functional roles of soil fungi in both healthy and root-rot infected <span class="html-italic">L. barbarum</span> plants, categorizing the fungi into eight trophic modes and sixty-eight subgroups. C and D are Network diagrams drawn according to trophic mode in the H and D groups, where node represents trophic mode classification, node size represents OTU data values, Fn 1, Fn 2, Fn 3, etc. are abbreviations for OTU, blue lines represent two OTU with positive relationships, and red lines represent negative relationships between two OTU, through the analysis conducted via FUNGuild. The study revealed that 80.4% of the nutritional modes were understood in the healthy plants, while 79.9% were predicted in the infected ones. Notably, the pathotrophic (P) and saprotrophic (Sa) nutritional types exhibited significant positive and negative interactions, respectively, in both the healthy (H) and infected (D) plants. Pathogens were more prevalent in the infected plants, whereas the healthy plants predominantly harbored mutualistic and saprotrophic fungi.</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Site
2.2. Sample Processing
2.3. Determination of Soil Physicochemical Properties
2.4. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and ITS2 Sequencing
2.5. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Chemical Properties of Soil
3.2. The Number of OTUs and Alpha Diversity of Fungi
3.3. Community Composition and Relative Abundance of Fungi
3.4. NMDS and LEfSe of Fungal Community Composition
3.5. Effects of Soil Chemical Properties on Fungal Community Structure
3.6. Functions of Soil Fungi Associated with the Changes in Community Structure
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
References
- Skenderidis, P.; Mitsagga, C.; Giavasis, I.; Petrotos, K.; Lampakis, D.; Leontopoulos, S. The in vitro antimicrobial activity assessment of ultrasound assisted Lycium barbarum fruit extracts and pomegranate fruit peels. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 2017–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, H.; Lee, D.H.; Jeong, D.; Jang, J.; Son, Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, H. Study on Betaine and Growth Characteristics of Lycium chinense Mill. in Different Cultivation Environments in South Korea. Plants 2024, 13, 2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, C.; Chen, Z.; Liao, W.; Zhang, R.; Chen, G.; Ma, L.; Yu, H. The Medicinal Species of the Lycium Genus (Goji berries) in East Asia: A Review of Its Effect on Cell Signal Transduction Pathways. Plants 2024, 13, 1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, C.; An, Y.; Du, Z.; Gao, H.; Su, J.; Xu, C. Differences in Soil Microbial Communities between Healthy and Diseased Lycium barbarum cv. Ningqi-5 Plants with Root Rot. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; He, K.; Zhang, T.; Tang, D.; Li, R.; Jia, S. Physiological responses of Goji berry (Lycium barbarum L.) to saline-alkaline soil from Qinghai region, China. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amagase, H.; Farnsworth, N.R. A review of botanical characteristics, phytochemistry, clinical relevance in efficacy and safety of Lycium barbarum fruit (goji). Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1702–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Li, N.; Gao, Q.; Wang, J.; Chen, S.; Xing, R. Effects of root rot on microbial communities associated with goji berry (Lycium barbarum) in the Qaidam Basin, China. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2023, 167, 853–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uwaremwe, C.; Yue, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, Z.; et al. Molecular identification and pathogenicity of Fusarium and Alternaria species associated with root rot disease of wolfberry in Gansu and Ningxia provinces, China. Plant Pathol. 2020, 70, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, M.; Wang, D.; Zhang, P.; Na, L.; Yin, H. Microbial metabolic traits drive the differential contribution of microbial necromass to soil organic carbon between the rhizosphere of absorptive roots and transport roots. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2024, 197, 109529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.H.; Zheng, G. Soil nematode community structure in the rhizosphere of Lycium barbarum. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016, 27, 1647–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashida, M.; Mujawara, L.; Shahzade, T.; Almeelbi, T.; Iqbal, M.; Oves, M. Bacteria and fungi can contribute to nutrients bioavailability and aggregate formation in degraded soils. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 183, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taheri, A.; Hamel, C.; Gan, Y. Pyrosequencing reveals the impact of foliar fungicide application to chickpea on root fungal communities of durum wheat in subsequent year. Fungal Ecol. 2015, 15, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monkai, J.; Purahong, W.; Nawaz, A.; Wubet, T.; Hyde, K.; Goldberg, S.; Mortimer, P.; Xu, J.; Harrison, R. Conversion of rainforest to rubber plantations impacts the rhizosphere soil mycobiome and alters soil biological activity. Land. Degrad. Dev. 2022, 33, 3411–3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Hu, L.; Xu, D.; Zhu, X.; Mo, H. Quality Changes and Fungal Microbiota Dynamics in Stored Jujube Fruits: Insights from High-Throughput Sequencing for Food Preservation. Foods 2024, 13, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, M.; Sun, H.; Dai, H.; Xu, Z. Characterization of Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria for Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis) Development and Soil Nutrient Enrichment. Plants 2024, 13, 2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Li, J.; Qi, Y.; Guo, W.; Li, X.; Li, M. Effects of naked barley root rot on rhizosphere soil microorganisms and enzyme activity. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2017, 37, 5640–5649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santoyo, G. How plants recruit their microbiome? New insights into beneficial interactions. J. Adv. Res. 2022, 40, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Chen, H.; Sun, H.; Yang, F. In the Qaidam Basin, Soil Nutrients Directly or Indirectly Affect Desert Ecosystem Stability under Drought Stress through Plant Nutrients. Plants 2024, 13, 1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Zheng, J. Adaptive strategies based on shrub leaf-stem anatomy and their environmental interpretations in the eastern Qaidam Basin. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qiu, L.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, J.; Yin, X. Effects of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) onsoil properties in the loessial gully region of the loess plateau, China. Plant Soil. 2010, 332, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zheng, Q.; Liu, J.; Pei, S.; Yang, Z.; Chen, R.; Ma, L.; Niu, J.; Tian, T. Bacterial–fungal interactions and response to heavy metal contamination of soil in agricultural areas. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1395154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, F.; Chu, C.; Xu, Z. Effects of different fertilizer formulas on the growth of loquat rootstocks and stem lignification. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Fang, F.; Wei, J.; Wu, X.; Cui, R.; Li, G.; Zheng, F.; Tan, D. Humic acid fertilizer improved soil properties and soil microbial diversity of continuous cropping peanut: A three-year experiment. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Ji, S.; Duan, G.; Fan, G.; Li, J.; Wang, Z. Staining methods on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Lycium barbarum roots and the relationship between colonization rate and soil factors. J. J. Shandong Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2024, 59, 12–22. [Google Scholar]
- Pei, G.; Zhu, Y.; Wen, J.; Pei, Y.; Li, H. Vinegar residue supported nanoscale zero-valent iron: Remediation of hexavalent chromium in soil. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 256, 113407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karlsson, I.; Friberg, H.; Steinberg, C.; Persson, P. Fungicide effects on fungal community composition in the wheat phyllosphere. PLoS ONE. 2014, 9, e111786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, P.; He, Y.; Mu, Y.; Lv, X.; Zhuang, L. Bacterial diversity and community structure in the rhizosphere of four Ferula species. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhary, P.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Khatri, S.; Dalal, R.; Kopittke, P.; Sharma, S. Delineating the soil physicochemical and microbiological factors conferring disease suppression in organic farms. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 289, 127880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callahan, B.; McMurdie, P.; Rosen, M.; Han, A.; Johnson, A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.; Dillon, M. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, N.; Song, Z.; Bates, S.; Branco, S.; Tedersoo, L.; Menke, J.; Schilling, J.; Kennedy, P. FUNGuild: An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 2016, 20, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Vries, F.; Griffiths, R.; Bailey, M. Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought than fungal networks. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amand, J.; Fehlmann, T.; Backes, C.; Keller, A. DynaVenn: Web-based computation of the most significant overlap between ordered sets. BMC Bioinform. 2019, 20, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Xiong, W.; Zhang, R.; Huan, X.; Wang, D.; Shen, Q. Continuous application of different organic additives can suppress tomato disease by inducing the healthy rhizospheric microbiota through alterations to the bulk soil microflora. Plant Soil. 2018, 423, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, W.; Gong, J.; Peng, W.; Luan, W.; Liu, Y.; Huang, H.; Mei, X.; Min, Y.; Zhu, S. Alleviating soil acidification to suppress Panax notoginseng soil-borne disease by modifying soil properties and the microbiome. Plant Soil 2024, 502, 653–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, H.; Shen, J.; Riaz, M.; Jiang, C.; Zu, C.; Jiang, C.; Liu, B. Effects of Biochar and Straw Amendment on Soil Fertility and Microbial Communities in Paddy Soils. Plants 2024, 13, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Hu, J.; Wei, X.; Huang, K.; Li, C.; Yang, G. Deciphering core microbiota in rhizosphere soil and roots of healthy and Rhizoctonia solani-infected potato plants from various locations. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1386417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, D.; Jing, T.; Chen, Y.; Wang, F.; Qi, D.; Feng, R.; Xie, J.; Li, H. Deciphering microbial diversity associated with Fusarium wilt-diseased and disease-free banana rhizosphere soil. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Que, Y.; Yu, D.; Wang, H. The influence of rhizosphere soil fungal diversity and complex community structure on wheat root rot disease. PeerJ 2021, 9, e12601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huusko, K.; Manninen, O.H.; Myrsky, E.; Stark, S. Soil fungal and bacterial communities reflect differently tundra vegetation state transitions and soil physico-chemical properties. New Phytol. 2024, 243, 407–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiao, N.; Song, X.; Song, R.; Yin, D.; Deng, X. Diversity and structure of the microbial community in rhizosphere soil of Fritillaria ussuriensis at different health levels. PeerJ 2022, 10, e12778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Mao, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Gu, M.; Tang, Q.; Song, S.; Huang, W.; Wang, B.; et al. Structures and biodiversity of fungal communities in rhizosphere soil of root rot diseased garlic. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2020, 36, 145–153. [Google Scholar]
- Song, X.; Tan, J.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X. Illumina high-throughput sequencing reveals fungal community composition and diversity in root rot of Coptis chinensis in rhizosphere soil. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2018, 49, 5396–5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Chen, T.; Cai, L.; Li, Z.; Fang, F.; Jin, S. Research on soil enzyme activity and fungal community structure in rhizosphere soil of Actinidia chinensis Planch with root rot. South China Fruits 2024, 53, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, W.; Chen, J.; Liao, X.; Chen, X.; Huang, L.; Huang, J.; Huang, R.; Zhong, S.; Zhang, X. Biodiversity, Distribution and Functional Differences of Fungi in Four Species of Corals from the South China Sea, Elucidated by High-Throughput Sequencing Technology. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Guo, H.; Duan, G.; Wang, Z.; Fan, G.; Li, J. Role and mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in enhancing plant stress resistance and soil Improvement: A review. China Powder Sci. Technol. 2024, 30, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, C. Study on the Resistance Mechanism of Nine Astragalus Root and Rot and Compre Adsurgens Varieties to Yellow Stunt Hensive Evaluation for Germplasm Characteristics. Ph.D. Thesis, Lanzhou University in China, Lanzhou, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, D.; Niu, B.; Yin, Y.; Hua, Z.; Jia, S.; Gao, M. Isolation, identification and growth characteristics of garlic root rot pathogen Alternaria embellisia DS55-6F. Soil Fertil. Sci. China 2022, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Yin, M.; Duan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wan, H.; Kang, Y.; Qi, G.; Jia, Q. Enhancing water and soil resources utilization via wolfberry–alfalfa intercropping. Plants 2024, 13, 2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Dong, Y.; Feng, G.; Yao, Q.; Liu, C.; Zhu, H. Differences of soil fungal community structure and driving factors between healthy and mismanaging tea plantations in Heshan of southern China. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2024, 64, 1417–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, F.; Yu, W.; You, Z. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer applications on fungal community and functional groups in tea plantation soil. Acta Tea Sin. 2021, 62, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Wang, N.; Zhang, J.; Hu, Y.; Cai, D.; Guo, J.; Wu, D.; Sun, G. Soil Physicochemical properties and the rhizosphere soil fungal community in a mulberry (Morus alba L.)/alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) intercropping system. Forests 2019, 10, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Location | Abbreviation | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude (m) | Sample Size (Number) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nuomuhong farm, Zongjia town, Dulan county | XY | 36.39127 | 96.458381 | 2768.33 | 12 |
NY | 36.436204 | 96.484412 | 2752.84 | 12 | |
NSI | 36.440156 | 96.313511 | 2718.31 | 12 | |
NW | 36.4289 | 96.267501 | 2719.58 | 12 | |
NS | 36.440189 | 96.354075 | 2736.39 | 12 | |
NE | 36.448763 | 96.475582 | 2718.97 | 6 | |
Dagele township, Golmud city | KP | 36.437893 | 95.717555 | 2733.58 | 12 |
Guolemude town, Golmud city | GEM | 36.417216 | 94.304577 | 2767.54 | 12 |
Huaitoutala town, Delingha city | WSJ | 37.338021 | 96.695822 | 2812.01 | 12 |
Total | 102 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Duan, G.; Fan, G.; Li, J.; Liu, M.; Qi, Y. Investigating the Rhizosphere Fungal Communities of Healthy and Root-Rot-Infected Lycium barbarum in the Tsaidam Basin, China. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122447
Duan G, Fan G, Li J, Liu M, Qi Y. Investigating the Rhizosphere Fungal Communities of Healthy and Root-Rot-Infected Lycium barbarum in the Tsaidam Basin, China. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(12):2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122447
Chicago/Turabian StyleDuan, Guozhen, Guanghui Fan, Jianling Li, Min Liu, and Youchao Qi. 2024. "Investigating the Rhizosphere Fungal Communities of Healthy and Root-Rot-Infected Lycium barbarum in the Tsaidam Basin, China" Microorganisms 12, no. 12: 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122447
APA StyleDuan, G., Fan, G., Li, J., Liu, M., & Qi, Y. (2024). Investigating the Rhizosphere Fungal Communities of Healthy and Root-Rot-Infected Lycium barbarum in the Tsaidam Basin, China. Microorganisms, 12(12), 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122447