Estimating Dynamic Cellular Morphological Properties via the Combination of the RTCA System and a Hough-Transform-Based Algorithm
<p>The framework of the digital image process. (<b>a</b>) Image preprocessing includes gray transformation, median filter, contrast manipulation, and canny edge detection; (<b>b</b>) Hough transform (HT) demonstrates the transformation between image space and parameter space; and (<b>c</b>) post-processing includes removing excessive lines and integrating intersecting lines.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Two kinds of detection before and after post-processing. The red circles represent excessive lines for marking cells, and the blue circles represent lines with points of intersection.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Changes in morphology and biomarkers in the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β)-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) process of A549 cells. (<b>a</b>) Schematic treatment points of experimental design. After serum starvation for 24 h, cells were treated with TGF-β (10 ng/mL), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (100 and 500 ng/mL), and cigarette smoke extract (CSE) (1% and 2%) for 48 h. (<b>b</b>) Representative images (original magnification 200×). Red arrows indicate a part of the typical cell shape (cobblestone type) in the control group, and blue arrows indicate a part of the fibroblast type of A549 cells after stimulation by TGF-β. (<b>c</b>) Representative bands and quantitative analysis of EMT markers (fibronectin, E-cadherin, and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). The expressions were detected by Western blot. GAPDH was used as the loading control. *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 vs. the control group, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3.</p> "> Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Changes in morphology and biomarkers in the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β)-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) process of A549 cells. (<b>a</b>) Schematic treatment points of experimental design. After serum starvation for 24 h, cells were treated with TGF-β (10 ng/mL), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (100 and 500 ng/mL), and cigarette smoke extract (CSE) (1% and 2%) for 48 h. (<b>b</b>) Representative images (original magnification 200×). Red arrows indicate a part of the typical cell shape (cobblestone type) in the control group, and blue arrows indicate a part of the fibroblast type of A549 cells after stimulation by TGF-β. (<b>c</b>) Representative bands and quantitative analysis of EMT markers (fibronectin, E-cadherin, and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). The expressions were detected by Western blot. GAPDH was used as the loading control. *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 vs. the control group, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Real-time detection cell index of A549 with different treatments in the xCELLigence real-time cell analysis (RTCA) single-plate (SP) (RTCA SP) system. (<b>a</b>) A549 cells were treated with TGF-β and LPS (100 and 500 ng/mL). The serum starvation step for 24 h starts from the blue vertical line to the black vertical line in the timeline. The time interval between the black and red vertical lines represents administration for 48 h, and the black vertical line is the time to normalize the cell index. Representative curves of the normalized cell index. (<b>b</b>) The representative interval slope of the TGF-β and LPS groups. (<b>c</b>) A549 cells were treated with TGF-β and CSE (1% and 2%). The conditions were the same as above. (<b>d</b>) The representative interval slope of the TGF-β and CSE groups. For the LPS experiment, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 9; for the CSE experiment, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6. *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01, * <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05 vs. control group. ### <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 24–48 h groups vs. 0–24 h groups. &&& <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001 vs. TGF-β group in different time intervals.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Morphological analysis of A549 cells using image processing techniques. The original pictures were obtained by optical microscope (200× magnification). (<b>a</b>) Representative images of A549 cells in the control and TGF-β groups from days 0 to 3. (<b>b</b>) Representative images of A549 cells in LPS (100 and 500 ng/mL) and CSE (1% and 2%) groups on days 2 and 3 (green: cell length; red: start point; yellow: end point).</p> "> Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Morphological analysis of A549 cells using image processing techniques. The original pictures were obtained by optical microscope (200× magnification). (<b>a</b>) Representative images of A549 cells in the control and TGF-β groups from days 0 to 3. (<b>b</b>) Representative images of A549 cells in LPS (100 and 500 ng/mL) and CSE (1% and 2%) groups on days 2 and 3 (green: cell length; red: start point; yellow: end point).</p> "> Figure 6
<p>The quantification of the length and quantity of detected lines. (<b>a</b>) A scatter dot plot of the length of the detected lines between the control and TGF-β groups. Pie charts represent the percentages of different length levels on day 2: 20–25, 25–30, 30–40, and >40 pixels. (<b>b</b>) A scatter dot plot comparing the six different groups (control; TGF-β; LPS 100 ng/mL and 500 ng/mL; 1% and 2% CSE groups) on day 2. (<b>c</b>) A scatter dot comparing the six different treatments on day 3. (<b>d</b>) A line graph focused on the number of lines detected from day 0 to 3 in the six groups. <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3. *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 vs. control group in different time points. ### <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001, ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01, # <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05 Day 1 vs. Day 2. <span>$</span><span>$</span> <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01, <span>$</span> <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05 Day 2 vs. Day 3. &&& <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001 vs. TGF-β group in different time points.</p> "> Figure 6 Cont.
<p>The quantification of the length and quantity of detected lines. (<b>a</b>) A scatter dot plot of the length of the detected lines between the control and TGF-β groups. Pie charts represent the percentages of different length levels on day 2: 20–25, 25–30, 30–40, and >40 pixels. (<b>b</b>) A scatter dot plot comparing the six different groups (control; TGF-β; LPS 100 ng/mL and 500 ng/mL; 1% and 2% CSE groups) on day 2. (<b>c</b>) A scatter dot comparing the six different treatments on day 3. (<b>d</b>) A line graph focused on the number of lines detected from day 0 to 3 in the six groups. <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3. *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01 vs. control group in different time points. ### <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001, ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01, # <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05 Day 1 vs. Day 2. <span>$</span><span>$</span> <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.01, <span>$</span> <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.05 Day 2 vs. Day 3. &&& <span class="html-italic">p</span> < 0.001 vs. TGF-β group in different time points.</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Reagents
2.2. Cell Culture
2.3. Cell Index Assay in xCELLigence RTCA Single-Plate (SP) System
2.4. Western Blot Analysis
2.5. Detection of Morphological Parameters
2.5.1. Image Preprocessing
2.5.2. Hough Transform (HT)
2.5.3. Post-Processing
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Phenotypic Changes in the TGF-β-Induced EMT Process in A549 Cells
3.2. Real-Time Detection of Cell Index in A549 by xCELLigence RTCA SP System
3.3. Morphological Changes of A549 Cells Detected by Image Processing Techniques
3.4. Quantification of Cells’ Parameters using Image Processing Techniques
4. Discussion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hilsenbeck, O.; Schwarzfischer, M.; Skylaki, S.; Schauberger, B.; Hoppe, P.S.; Loeffler, D.; Kokkaliaris, K.D.; Hastreiter, S.; Skylaki, E.; Filipczyk, A.; et al. Software tools for single-cell tracking and quantification of cellular and molecular properties. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 703–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xie, L.; Law, B.K.; Chytil, A.M.; Brown, K.A.; Aakre, M.E.; Moses, H.L. Activation of the Erk pathway is required for TGF-β1-induced EMT in vitro. Neoplasia 2004, 6, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardner, M.; Meyer-schaller, N.; Christofori, G.; Beerenwinkel, N. Inferring signalling dynamics by integrating interventional with observational data. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, i577–i585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hay, E.D. An overview of epithelio-mesenchymal transformation. Cells Tissues Organs 1995, 154, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nieto, M.A. The Ins and Outs of the Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Health and Disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27, 347–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Thiery, J.P.; Acloque, H.; Huang, R.Y.J.; Nieto, M.A. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease. Cell 2009, 139, 871–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vogelmann, R.; Giehl, K.; Adler, G.; Wedlich, D.; Menke, A. TGFβ-induced downregulation of E-cadherin-based cell-cell adhesion depends on PI3-kinase and PTEN. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 4901–4912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osborne, L.D.; Li, G.Z.; How, T.; Brien, E.T.O.; Blobe, G.C. TGF-βregulates LARG and GEF-H1 during EMT to affect stiffening response to force and cell invasion. Mol. Biol. Cell 2014, 25, 3528–3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno-bueno, G.; Peinado, H.; Molina, P.; Olmeda, D.; Cubillo, E.; Santos, V.; Palacios, J.; Portillo, F.; Cano, A. The morphological and molecular features of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 1591–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Star, A.; Kubala, L.; Lincová, E.; Pernicová, Z.; Kozubík, A.; Sou, K. Dynamic Monitoring of Cellular Remodeling Induced by the Transforming Growth Factor-β1. Biol. Proced. Online 2009, 11, 316–324. [Google Scholar]
- Roshan, M.; Ada, M. Dynamic assessment of cell viability, proliferation and migration using real time cell analyzer system (RTCA). Cytotechnology 2015, 67, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yan, G.; Du, Q.; Wei, X.; Miozzi, J.; Kang, C.; Wang, J.; Han, X.; Pan, J.; Xie, H.; Chen, J.; et al. Application of real-time cell electronic analysis system in modern pharmaceutical evaluation and analysis. Molecules 2018, 23, 3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, M.; Fu, H.; Cheng, H.; Cao, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Mou, X.; Zhang, X. A dynamic real-time method for monitoring epithelial barrier function in vitro. Anal. Biochem. 2012, 425, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Witzel, F.; Fritsche-Guenther, R.; Lehmann, N.; Sieber, A.; Blüthgen, N. Analysis of impedance-based cellular growth assays. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 2705–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abassi, Y.A.; Jackson, J.A.; Zhu, J.; Connell, J.O.; Wang, X.; Xu, X. Label-free, real-time monitoring of Ig E-mediated mast cell activation on microelectronic cell sensor arrays. J. Immunol. Methods 2004, 292, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Şener, L.T.; Albeniz, G.; Dinç, B.; Albeniz, I. iCELLigence real-time cell analysis system for examining the cytotoxicity of drugs to cancer cell lines. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017, 14, 1866–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yan, G.; Zhu, Z.; Jin, L.; Chen, J.; Xie, H.; Miozzi, J.; Lei, F.; Wei, X.; Pan, J. Study on the quality evaluation of compound Danshen preparations based on the Xcelligence real-time cell-based assay and pharmacodynamic authentication. Molecules 2018, 23, 2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatalakshmi, B.; Thilagavathi, K. Automatic red blood cell counting using hough transform. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Conference on Information & Communication Technologies (ICT), Thuckalay, Tamil Nadu, India, 11–12 April 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Bewes, J.M.; Suchowerska, N.; McKenzie, D.R. Automated cell colony counting and analysis using the circular Hough image transform algorithm (CHiTA). Phys. Med. Biol. 2008, 53, 5991–6008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duda, R.O.; Hart, P.E. Use of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Commun. ACM 1972, 15, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matas, J. Robust Detection of Lines Using the Progressive Probabilistic Hough Transform. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 2000, 78, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Shin, B.; Klette, R. Closed form line-segment extraction using the Hough transform. Pattern Recognit. 2015, 48, 4012–4023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, A.; Donnell, R.A.O.; Powell, R.M.; Sanders, M.W.; Holgate, S.T.; Djukanovi, R.; Davies, D.E. Autocrine Ligands for the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mediate Interleukin-8 Release from Bronchial Epithelial Cells in Response to Cigarette Smoke. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2002, 27, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Comer, D.M.; Elborn, J.S.; Ennis, M. Inflammatory and cytotoxic effects of acrolein, nicotine, acetylaldehyde and cigarette smoke extract on human nasal epithelial cells. BMC Pulm. Med. 2014, 14, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pratt, W.K. Digital Image Processing, 3rd ed.; A Wiley-Interscience Publication: Los Altos, CA, USA, 2001; Volume 5, ISBN 0471374075. [Google Scholar]
- Canny, J. A Computational Approach to Edge Detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1986, PAMI-8, 679–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, R.Y.; Guilford, P. Early events in cell adhesion and polarity during epithelial- mesenchymal transition. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 4417–4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaw, S.Y.; Majeed, A.A.; Dalley, A.J.; Chan, A.; Stein, S.; Farah, C.S. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) biomarkers—E-cadherin, beta-catenin, APC and Vimentin—in oral squamous cell carcinogenesis and transformation. Oral Oncol. 2012, 48, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Duan, J.; Liu, X.; Guo, S. Platelets drive smooth muscle metaplasia and fibrogenesis in endometriosis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 428, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubchak, S.C.; Runyan, C.E.; Kreisberg, J.I.; Schnaper, H.W. Cytoskeletal Rearrangement and Signal Transduction in TGF-β1–Stimulated Mesangial Cell Collagen Accumulation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2003, 14, 1969–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oft, M.; Heider, K.; Beug, H. TGF β signaling is necessary for carcinoma cell invasiveness and metastasis. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8, 1243–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marlina, S.; Shu, M.; Abubakar, S.; Zandi, K. Development of a Real-Time Cell Analysing (RTCA) method as a fast and accurate screen for the selection of chikungunya virus replication inhibitors. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valcourt, U.; Kowanetz, M.; Niimi, H.; Heldin, C. TGF-βand the Smad Signaling Pathway Support Transcriptomic Reprogramming during Epithelial- Mesenchymal Cell Transition. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16, 1987–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lamouille, S.; Derynck, R. Cell size and invasion in TGF-β–induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition is regulated by activation of the mTOR pathway. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gonzalez, D.M.; Medici, D. Signaling mechanisms of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Sci. Signal. 2014, 7, re8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, D.; Liu, J. LPS promotes epithelial—mesenchymal transition and activation of TLR4/JNK signaling. Tumor Biol. 2014, 35, 10429–10435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, T.A.O.; Chen, Z.; Fang, L. Curcumin inhibits LPS-induced EMT through downregulation of NF-κB-Snail signaling in breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 29, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, B.; Guan, Y.; Shen, H.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, J.; Dong, X. Akt/PKB signaling regulates cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary epithelial- mesenchymal transition. Lung Cancer 2018, 122, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J.; Chen, H. Cigarette smoke extract exposure induces EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR-mutated NSCLC via mediating Src activation and EMT. Lung Cancer 2016, 93, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, L.; Ye, Y.; Dhar, R.; Deng, J.; Tang, H. Estimating Dynamic Cellular Morphological Properties via the Combination of the RTCA System and a Hough-Transform-Based Algorithm. Cells 2019, 8, 1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101287
Zhang L, Ye Y, Dhar R, Deng J, Tang H. Estimating Dynamic Cellular Morphological Properties via the Combination of the RTCA System and a Hough-Transform-Based Algorithm. Cells. 2019; 8(10):1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101287
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Lejun, Yang Ye, Rana Dhar, Jinsong Deng, and Huifang Tang. 2019. "Estimating Dynamic Cellular Morphological Properties via the Combination of the RTCA System and a Hough-Transform-Based Algorithm" Cells 8, no. 10: 1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101287
APA StyleZhang, L., Ye, Y., Dhar, R., Deng, J., & Tang, H. (2019). Estimating Dynamic Cellular Morphological Properties via the Combination of the RTCA System and a Hough-Transform-Based Algorithm. Cells, 8(10), 1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101287