Radiation Detection—CD/DVD, Glass, and Emerging Materials for Radon Exposure Assessment
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Periodic vs. Real-Time Radon Monitoring Methods
3.1. Non-Traditional Innovations in Monitoring
3.2. Traditional Methods
3.3. Comparative Advantages
4. CD and DVD Optical Methods for Radon Detection
4.1. Mechanism of Radon Detection Using CDs and DVDs
4.2. Comparative Efficiency of CDs and DVDs as Radon Detectors
4.3. Application and Case Studies Using CD/DVD Methods
5. Glass-Based Radon Detection
5.1. Mechanisms and Effectiveness
5.2. Performance and Application of Glass-Based Radon Detectors
5.3. Application and Case Studies
6. Incorporating Novel Materials: Nanotechnology and Polymers in Radon Detection
6.1. Polymers in Radon Detection
6.2. Comparative Analysis of Novel Material vs. Traditional Techniques
7. Economic Feasibility and Practical Applications of CDs, DVDs, and Glass-Based Radon Detection
Affordability and Accessibility
8. Technological Integration: IoT and AI in Radon Monitoring
Machine Learning for Enhanced Detection Accuracy
9. Environmental and Ecological Impact of Non-Traditional Radon Detection Methods
Green Building Applications
10. Health Risk Modeling and Predictive Analysis Using Non-Traditional Methods
11. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bahnamiri, S.B.; Hakimabad, S.H.M.; Najafabadi, R.I. Comparison of Radon (222Rn) and Thoron (220Rn) Gamma Dosimetry in the Environment Using the ORNL Mathematical Phantom. J. Biomed. Phys. Eng. 2012, 2, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
- Maier, A.; Bailey, T.; Hinrichs, A.; Lerchl, S.; Newman, R.T.; Fournier, C.; Vandevoorde, C. Experimental Setups for In Vitro Studies on Radon Exposure in Mammalian Cells—A Critical Overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.-K.; Seo, S.; Jin, Y.W. Health Effects of Radon Exposure. Yonsei Med. J. 2019, 60, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lantz, P.M.; Mendez, D.; Philbert, M.A. Radon, Smoking, and Lung Cancer: The Need to Refocus Radon Control Policy. Am. J. Public Health 2013, 103, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birk, M.; Žagar, T.; Tomšič, S.; Lokar, K.; Mihor, A.; Bric, N.; Mlakar, M.; Zadnik, V. Impact of Indoor Radon Exposure on Lung Cancer Incidence in Slovenia. Cancers 2024, 16, 1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nilsson, R.; Tong, J. Opinion on Reconsideration of Lung Cancer Risk from Domestic Radon Exposure. Radiat. Med. Prot. 2020, 1, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorenzo-Gonzalez, M.; Ruano-Ravina, A.; Torres-Duran, M.; Kelsey, K.T.; Provencio, M.; Parente-Lamelas, I.; Piñeiro-Lamas, M.; Varela-Lema, L.; Perez-Rios, M.; Fernandez-Villar, A.; et al. Lung Cancer Risk and Residential Radon Exposure: A Pooling of Case-Control Studies in Northwestern Spain. Environ. Res. 2020, 189, 109968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pressyanov, D. Use of Polycarbonate Materials of High Radon Absorption Ability for Measuring Radon. Rom. J. Phys. 2013, 58, S221–S229. [Google Scholar]
- El-Taher, A. An Overview of Instrumentation for Measuring Radon in Environmental Studies. J. Rad. Nucl. Appl. 2018, 3, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramola, R.C.; Gusain, G.S.; Prasad, G. Retrospective Assessment of Indoor Radon Exposure by Measurements of Embedded 210Po Activity in Glass Objects. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 9123–9127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Ahlawat, W.; Kumar, R.; Dilbaghi, N. Graphene, Carbon Nanotubes, Zinc Oxide and Gold as Elite Nanomaterials for Fabrication of Biosensors for Healthcare. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 70, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baskaran, M. Radon Measurement Techniques. In Radon: A Tracer for Geological, Geophysical and Geochemical Studies; Baskaran, M., Ed.; Springer Geochemistry; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 15–35. ISBN 978-3-319-21329-3. [Google Scholar]
- Hamad, H.T.; Karim, M.S.; Kadhim, N.F. Comparison of Three Techniques for Measuring Radon Gas. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1879, 032052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sand, J.; Ihantola, S.; Peräjärvi, K.; Toivonen, H.; Toivonen, J. Optical Detection of Radon Decay in Air. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franci, D.; Aureli, T.; Cardellini, F. An alternative calibration of CR-39 detectors for radon detection beyond the saturation limit. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2016, 172, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, M.; Deng, H.; Tian, G.; Song, C.; Liu, H.; Shen, Y.; Lv, C. A Novel Detection of Radon Based on Its Decay Product Inducing Conformational Changes of an Aptamer Probe. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 936, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chambers, S.D.; Griffiths, A.D.; Williams, A.G.; Sisoutham, O.; Morosh, V.; Röttger, S.; Mertes, F.; Röttger, A. Portable Two-Filter Dual-Flow-Loop 222Rn Detector: Stand-Alone Monitor and Calibration Transfer Device. Adv. Geosci. 2022, 57, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pressyanov, D.S. Retrospective Measurements of Thoron and Radon by CDs/DVDs: A Model Approach. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2012, 149, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pressyanov, D.; Dimitrov, D.; Dimitrova, I. Energy-Efficient Reconstructions and Indoor Radon: The Impact Assessed by CDs/DVDs. J. Environ. Radioact. 2015, 143, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitrov, D.; Pressyanov, D. The CD/DVD method as a tool for the health physics service and ventilation diagnostics in underground mines. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2018, 181, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pressyanov, D.; Dimitrova, I.; Mitev, K.; Georgiev, S.; Dimitrov, D. Identifying Radon Priority Areas and Dwellings with Radon Exceedances in Bulgaria Using Stored CD/DVDs. J. Environ. Radioact. 2019, 196, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pressyanov, D.; Mitev, K.; Georgiev, S.; Dimitrova, I. Optimization of Etching Conditions of CDs/DVDs Used as Detectors for 222Rn. Radiat. Meas. 2015, 83, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pressyanov, D.; Quindos Poncela, L.S.; Georgiev, S.; Dimitrova, I.; Mitev, K.; Sainz, C.; Fuente, I.; Rabago, D. Testing and Calibration of CDs as Radon Detectors at Highly Variable Radon Concentrations and Temperatures. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadad, K.; Sarshough, S.; Faghihi, R.; Taheri, M. Application of Polystyrene Films for Indoor Radon Dosimetry as SSNTD. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2013, 74, 23–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pressyanov, D.S. Measuring Radioactive Noble Gases by Absorption in Polycarbonates and Other Organics: From Radon Indoors to Nuclear Safety. AIP Conf. Proc. 2013, 1544, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagarde, F.; Falk, R.; Almrén, K.; Nyberg, F.; Svensson, H.; Pershagen, G. Glass-Based Radon-Exposure Assessment and Lung Cancer Risk. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2002, 12, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.; Zhuo, W.; Fan, D.; Yi, Y.; Chen, B. Effects of Atmospheric Parameters on Radon Measurements Using Alpha-Track Detectors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2014, 85, 022101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giammanco, S.; Immè, G.; Mangano, G.; Morelli, D.; Neri, M. Comparison between Different Methodologies for Detecting Radon in Soil along an Active Fault: The Case of the Pernicana Fault System, Mt. Etna (Italy). Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2009, 67, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahaffey, J.A.; Parkhurst, M.A.; James, A.C.; Cross, F.T.; Alavanja, M.C.; Boice, J.D.; Ezrine, S.; Henderson, P.; Brownson, R.C. Estimating Past Exposure to Indoor Radon from Household Glass. Health Phys. 1993, 64, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLaughlin, J.P. The Application of Techniques to Retrospectively Assess Radon Exposure Retrospectively. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 1998, 78, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahlobo, M.; Nsibande, M.; Farid, S.M. Indoor 222Rn Measurements in Swaziland with the Solid State Nuclear Track Detector. J. Environ. Radioact. 1995, 27, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramnani, P.; Saucedo, N.; Mulchandani, A. Carbon Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for Label-Free Sensing of Environmental Pollutants. Chemosphere 2016, 143, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Li, J.; Shi, K.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, X.; Xiong, Z.; Zou, X.; Wang, Y. Graphene Coated by Polydopamine/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Modified Electrode for Highly Selective Detection of Dopamine and Uric Acid in the Presence of Ascorbic Acid. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 770, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adhikari, B.-R.; Govindhan, M.; Chen, A. Carbon Nanomaterials Based Electrochemical Sensors/Biosensors for the Sensitive Detection of Pharmaceutical and Biological Compounds. Sensors 2015, 15, 22490–22508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Zheng, J. High-Index {hk0} Facets Platinum Concave Nanocubes Loaded on Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite for Highly Sensitive Simultaneous Detection of Dopamine and Uric Acid. Talanta 2020, 207, 120296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kholopo, M.; Rathebe, P.C. Radon Exposure Assessment in Occupational and Environmental Settings: An Overview of Instruments and Methods. Sensors 2024, 24, 2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blanco-Novoa, Ó.; Fernández-Caramés, T.; Fraga-Lamas, P.; Castedo, L. A Cost-Effective IoT System for Monitoring Indoor Radon Gas Concentration. Sensors 2018, 18, 2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blengini, G.; Busto, M.; Fantoni, M.; Fino, D. Eco-Efficient Waste Glass Recycling: Integrated Waste Management and Green Product Development through LCA. Waste Manag. 2012, 32, 1000–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Detection Method | Category | Advantages | Limitations | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alpha Track Detectors | Periodic Monitoring | Relatively affordable, straightforward chemical processing for track reading | Limited to long-term, post-exposure analysis only; requires lab setup for processing | [12] |
Charcoal Canisters | Periodic Monitoring | Short-term, simple, cost-effective | Susceptible to environmental factors; requires analysis after exposure period | [13] |
Continuous Radon Monitors (CRMs) | Real-Time Monitoring | Real-time data acquisition, accurate, commonly used in professional settings | Higher costs; requires professional handling and calibration | [9] |
Electret Ion Chambers | Periodic Monitoring | Short- and long-term, cost-effective | Requires special equipment for analysis | [13] |
CD-/DVD-Based Detection | Periodic Monitoring | Extremely low cost due to the widespread CD/DVD availability, allows for DIY and scalable monitoring | Requires more complex post-exposure electrochemical etching; not widely adopted yet | [14] |
Glass-Based Detection | Periodic Monitoring | Highly sensitive, for long-term monitoring, suitable for historical exposure assessment | Affected by environmental factors (temperature, pressure); requires specialized processing for track reading | [15] |
Aptamer-Based Detection | Real-Time Monitoring | Highly sensitive, non-radioactive | Complexity in design and application | [16] |
Optical Detection Methods | Real-Time Monitoring | Rapid, real-time detection | Requires optical systems and calibration | [14] |
Two-Filter Dual-Flow-Loop Monitors | Real-Time Monitoring | Continuous, highly accurate, portable | Complex and costly, requires specialized calibration | [17] |
Criteria | CDs | DVDs | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Material Thickness | Single-layer polycarbonate | Multilayer polycarbonate | [20] |
Alpha Track Depth Detection | 69–80 µm (shallow depth) | Up to 120 µm (deeper detection) | [18] |
Detection Sensitivity (Radon Concentration Range) | Reliable for 20–200 Bq/m3 | Effective for 20–600 Bq/m3 | [19] |
Minimum Detection Limit | ~20 Bq/m3 | ~15 Bq/m3 | [21] |
Etching Process Sensitivity | Moderate, optimized etching needed | High sensitivity due to multilayer structure | [22] |
Performance in High Concentrations | May saturate at >400 Bq/m3 | Reliable in concentrations > 500 Bq/m3 | [23] |
Environmental Condition Sensitivity | Minor variability in efficiency under stable conditions | Better adaptability to temperature/humidity changes | [24] |
Cost | Low (widely available, affordable) | Low (slightly higher than CDs) | [21] |
Application | Suitable for general radon mapping, mining, homes, and workplaces | Optimized for high-radon environments such as industrial settings | [20] |
Long-Term Retrospective Measurement Capacity | Effective for extended measurements (months), reliable for long-term retrospective measurement | Suitable for both short-term and long-term measurements | [25] |
Feature | Nanomaterial (Graphene, CNTs) | Polymers (Functionalized Sensors) | Non-Traditional Techniques (CD, DVD, Glass) |
---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity | High sensitivity due to large surface area and electron mobility [11] | Moderate to high sensitivity; selective binding to radon decay particles [33] | Lower sensitivity; relies on physical adsorption or etching by radon progeny |
Response Time | Real-time detection with rapid electronic transfer [32] | Near real-time, fast response based on selective chemical interactions | Delayed detection; post-exposure analysis required |
Portability | Portable devices with continuous monitoring capabilities [34] | Portable and adaptable to different environmental conditions [33] | Limited portability; typically requires fixed systems |
Selectivity | High selectivity with functionalized surfaces and nanocomposites [35] | Selective binding of radon decay products through chemical engineering | Lower selectivity; relies on physical interaction with radon progeny |
Environmental Adaptability | Effective in various environments; durable materials with minimal interference | Highly adaptable to diverse environmental conditions (temperature and humidity) | Affected by environmental factors like humidity and temperature |
Cost | Moderate to high due to advanced materials and fabrication costs | Moderate; potentially cost-effective in mass production | Generally low-cost methods with limited precision and functionality |
Maintenance and Calibration | Requires periodic calibration; high-precision electronics | Requires maintenance for surface coating and functional materials | Requires maintenance for surface coating and functional materials |
Scalability | High scalability for industrial applications and large-scale monitoring | Highly scalable, especially in environmental monitoring systems | Limited scalability due to size and post-processing requirements |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rathebe, P.C.; Kholopo, M. Radiation Detection—CD/DVD, Glass, and Emerging Materials for Radon Exposure Assessment. Sensors 2024, 24, 7674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237674
Rathebe PC, Kholopo M. Radiation Detection—CD/DVD, Glass, and Emerging Materials for Radon Exposure Assessment. Sensors. 2024; 24(23):7674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237674
Chicago/Turabian StyleRathebe, Phoka C., and Mota Kholopo. 2024. "Radiation Detection—CD/DVD, Glass, and Emerging Materials for Radon Exposure Assessment" Sensors 24, no. 23: 7674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237674
APA StyleRathebe, P. C., & Kholopo, M. (2024). Radiation Detection—CD/DVD, Glass, and Emerging Materials for Radon Exposure Assessment. Sensors, 24(23), 7674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237674