ali_farahmand_m

Farzad Motamen made his film - his own film. This may seem a little strange to a filmmaker with a career of more than fifteen feature films, but it is perfectly normal for someone who does not like a significant number of his films. over the years, Motamen has become even more bitter, making a film that is extremely bitter, and at the same time, has increased his laughter - after all, one has to fit in somehow! "All Through the Night" is about all those years in filmmaking; The years when ideals slowly faded and disappeared. The failure of the Girl to reach the "master" in the "Bright Nights" was not so bitter that the creators of the Film did not achieve their ideals. "All Through the Night" is a hadith of the soul; It is a film that could not have come into being without the passing of bitter moments, without the disappearance of the people of a generation, and without going astray.

What has happened to the "Blockbusters" of the recent decade? There is no doubt that above all other options, the audience should be entertained; but to what extent is it worth to provide absurd entertainment aimlessly and without any story? "Mad Max: Fury Road" is as frivolous as 1920's "Slapstick" comedies; except that these comedies are assessed justifiable as they have been made at the emergence of cinema. However, such idiot-ism that hitting and banging the whole 2 hours is strange in 2015. "Mad Max" is story-less and there is no plan to involve the audience in events by drama. Too amateur illustrations that are tried to seem professional and rigorous! So what is the role of mis-en-scene? On what basis has it been arranged that do not help the story promote? "Mad Max: Fury Road" does not have necessary standards for being a movie at all; and this is the outcome of "Cinephilia" attitude that grabs "Cine- academia" aspects of the movie and presents inane scenes. Scenes that stems in illiteracy of the movie maker. The movie characters are infirm and unproductive. When a newcomer who has not meet previous versions of "Mad Max" watch this one, asks who is "Max"?, Why does not he talk in order to help the back-story enhance the narration? Who is the "Bad Man" of the movie? What has changed him into such a blood-thirsty monster? What is the purpose of the story? What is the relationship between "Water poverty" and the movie narration? And more important: Has George Miller thought of anything other than burning, shooting and Rock music? "Cinema" is a medium to "state" through scenes. "Mad Max: Fury Road" may gross a lot and receive many awards, but it is a pre-movie and a disaster and if it is placed in 10-best-movies list of many critics is because of the discreet charm of "Cinephilia".