Cave Women on Mars

We are our of dumb 1950s films so we have to make more. This guy is out doing Corman, with a new film every year.

This isn't science fiction, it's camp masquerading as farce. Nothing whatsoever to DO with science fiction: bad fantasy at best. Just made for bashing on Mystery Science Theater 3000. Might even qualify for cheap satire. But sci-fi??? It's annoying enough that some databases and bookstores lump science fiction, fantasy and horror together as if they were similar. They're NOT. Science fiction requires that a real scientific idea, theory, principle or a reasonable extrapolation from same be at the heart of the plot; in short, it can be improbable, fine, but not impossible. This film is so far from meeting that criterion it's absurd. Can anyone who's read the likes of Isaac Asimov, Ben Bova, Ray Bradbury, Arthur C. Clarke, Frank Herbert, Gregory Benford, Robert J. Sawyer, or Joe Haldeman put this garbage in the same category?? Oh, hell no. Skip this film if you're looking for sci-fi -- that's the best advice you can get. But if you want cheesy camp in a ridiculous 1950s-throwback style, maybe this is for you after all ...

It does make me want to convert my basement into a movie studio, too. I have some old cell phones lying around I could use as cameras. Raid my parents garage for props.

The acting and dialog are painful and the plot is... a plot, I guess.

I tend to enjoy the old crappy movies but I couldn't watch this for long so maybe it gets better

This series of movies is not a parody they are a homage to the fifties cheap movies.

These movies are self aware of this to the extreme people giving them low ratings just don't get it.

There is a tread that runs through them.

This and all Mihm movies are a farce they are purposely cheap looking and over acted. But unlike say an Ed Wood film this movie is self-aware and has an understanding that like most 50s sci fi films the science put forth is ridiculous. The fact that a reviewer calls this a farce not realizing that is exactly that says more about the reviewer then the movie. I have made this same comment about Mihm movies before and a response to my comment are that I must have been part of the film in some way and no thats not it at all. I do enjoy them and my only gripe with bad reviews is that the typical bad review always rips it for doing the exact thing it is intending. Ripping a movie for fulfilling its intent makes no sense. If you think it is bad fine but complaining it's bad and not realizing it's supposed to be bad is your fault. One last point Plan 9 was produced with a production company (a bad one) but had difficulty finding a distribution deal and took private financing and is considered by many to be worst film ever made but was intended as a real sci fi/ horror movie was produced for the equivalent in 2019 of $450,000. This was intended to make fun of movies like Plan 9 and was made in 2009 for $10000. If that in it self doesn't give you at least a grudging respect for this movie and all Mihm movies you have a fundamental lack of understanding of sarcasm and parody.