User reviews

You can't expect great things from Seduction Cinema, and films like this are the reason why. I would say that I don't know why I bothered watching this; but the reason why is clearly Misty Mundae and the high probability of plenty of lesbian action. The film delivers on both of these points, but it's also unbelievably boring and the plot is one of the most stupid I've seen in a Seduction Cinema flick; and that's really saying something. It has something do with Dracula (in this case, a hot lesbian) and a descendant of Van Helsing (a disgusting dimwit). The plot also has something to do with a phonesex line, and plenty of lesbian sex finds its way in also. The women are hot, but the sex scenes aren't. The film is extremely amateurish all round, and it doesn't have charm which means it's more a piece of crap than an enjoyable piece of crap. Despite all its shortcomings, this is actually not the worst film I've seen by Seduction Cinema; Lust for Dracula was slightly more rubbish. Even so, I don't recommend this flick; if you want to see modern softcore lesbians, see Dr Jekyll and Mistress Hyde or Sin Sisters instead.

Well, as far as the genre goes, this really isn't the worst one to watch out there but it of course is still being a ridicules and very amateur like made movie with some soft-core lesbian porn moments in it.

These movies are often made as an excuse to deliver a movie with a couple of sex sequences in it, with some story hanging around it, trying to make it all seem connected. It rarely ever does work out though and the sex sequences in this movie also seem to be come very random. It has nothing to do really with the movie and the story that it is telling.

Not that there is much story to tell though. In this movie Dracoola is being brought back to life again and it's up to Wally Van Helsing again to put her back into her grave. The same cast and crew made "Vampire Seduction" before, which also focused on the blood sucking lesbian count. The story is being told very poorly throughout the movie and the movie itself actually seems like it got shot by a couple of friends with a camcorder who decided to make a Dracula movie that they happened to made up as they went along with it. All of the sex sequences seem like they were put in later to please the fans of the genre. This is always so annoying, since it completely takes out the pace of the movie and distracts from the story that it is trying to tell. The sequences are overlong and they just show absolutely nothing but that is of course what soft-core porn is all about. Lovers of the genre shall probably not complain.

The movie is still being fun to watch though if you're kind of into the genre. The movie definitely has its camp value and of course the film-makers made no attempt to ever made this movie look like a serious or even just great one.

Still bad and silly but hardly the worst that the genre has to offer.

4/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

This sequel to "the Vampire's Seduction" is far from superior. The people who are usually good are good, but the newcomers (so to speak) aren't anything spectacular. The story is very boring and hard to pay attention to. Zach Snygg is funny, as is John Fedele and Tina Krause. Misty Mundae is hotter than ever (especially in the black Friday the 13th tank top), and AJ Khan and Darian Caine's sex scene is a laugh riot. But that's pretty much all it has going for it. I have seen much better from Seduction Cinema, but on the other hand I have seen much WORSE from them as well. Not for all tastes, but if you like your soft-core lesbian horror spoofs, then it's at least worth renting. This DVD contains a bonus featurette, which is actually just a super chopped-up, music-less version of the bathtub sex scene from the Factory 2000 film, "Slaughtered Lesbos 2: Satan's Hostages". Sad that I should know that right off-hand, but...um, yeah...

This is one you need to see if you have seen the others you will love this one. Enjoy ,cheers