14
Metascore
25 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 50New York Daily NewsJack MathewsNew York Daily NewsJack MathewsThe special effects work fine for minor acts of magic, but the climactic aerial dragon fight is lame, and most of the performances are at the level of high school plays.
- 50Philadelphia InquirerSteven ReaPhiladelphia InquirerSteven ReaMuch of the dialogue is the silliest sort of fantasy mush, and a good deal of the picture appears to have been shot while the lighting guys were out to lunch.
- 50Boston GlobeBoston GlobeA mildly entertaining but tepid extravaganza more suited to television than the big screen.
- 25San Francisco ChronicleMick LaSalleSan Francisco ChronicleMick LaSalleThe audience has already checked out, long before the formulaic finish.
- 20Film.comGemma FilesFilm.comGemma FilesGood intentions, bad writing.
- 10L.A. WeeklyPaul MalcolmL.A. WeeklyPaul MalcolmA cheap "Star Wars" rip-off with swords instead of light sabers.
- 10SalonAndrew O'HehirSalonAndrew O'HehirThis fantasy crap, fake-o effects and all, betrays princes of dice, masters of graph and wielders of bong.
- 10The New York TimesDana StevensThe New York TimesDana StevensTake this as a warning: it's not much fun.
- 0Village VoiceDennis LimVillage VoiceDennis LimAt once laboriously expository and defiantly incomprehensible.
- 0New York PostLou LumenickNew York PostLou LumenickTacky-looking, incoherent, badly acted and hopelessly directed disaster is easily the dullest adventure film of 2000.