User reviews

The story is actually a great idea but the acting is horribly executed. The actors must have worked for a hot meal. This whole movie looks like it was done by high schoolers on a $500 budget. Glad i didn't have to pay to see and sorry I wasted the time to watch.

Yes.. The other reviews are pretty much spot on.. Acting is horrible.. They try but the script and dialogues are terrible. Set design looks like someone's basement.. For a plane that looks that big when taking off, the inside is so noticeably incorrect.. Production values are so low you will have to see through.. But with some drunken friends.. Kelsey Grammer can do better. Thomas Jane did the best he could.. (see him in The Expanse for some fine acting).. Denise Richards.. well what can you do...whole movie looks like it was filmed with an iPhone.. Soundtrack from the 80s.. . Lol.. Luckily it's only 1hr 22min.. Good luck through the first 10 minutes!

I love Kelsey Grammer. But this movie is so odd. After seeing the Drew Gooden review, I decided to watch it. I loved the parts when they said the title of the movie "money plane, money plane and money plane." But this is awful. If you like movies that are awkward and uncomfortable, then you'll love this. It's not even trying to be ironic. It's just that lame. There are plenty of talented people who get their scripts denied. So to this movie got not only greenlit but actually made makes me have no faith in Hollywood. Fire who greenlit this movie.

This movie makes attack of the killer tomatoes a masterpiece

Seriously the acting of every single actor is soooo bad that i cannot help imagine them as po*nstars gathered to make a movie.

I hope everyone involved in this movie stops working in film for the rest of their existence.

One of the worst movie I ever watched 🤣

If you want to waste one and half hour be my guest

Dont bother !! Shocking acting. Poor ol Frasier, he was ok, but has obviously at the low point in his career to accept this weak story line... Shocker...

Ha Ha Ha!!!

Such a nice surprise to find a face value 2nd rate flick that doesn't try to be a an oscar worthy creation. Was splendid to see Kelsey Grammar. The rest of the cast are well fit for their roles.

Bottom line, I had low expectations for this movie and was surprisingly entertained throughout.

Peace!

I genuinely don't know what to rate MONEY PLANE. It's horrendously acted, edited, and directed. The budget was clearly little more than a nickel and a fossilized wad of gum, and the writing is high school level, complete with the most baldfaced expositional dialogue I've ever heard. And yet, I was laughing from start to finish-- I cannot tell if this movie is just incompetent or if it's a case where the filmmakers are trolling the audience.

It's basically a comedy: four incredibly incompetent criminals are blackmailed into pulling a heist on the Money Plane, where elite criminals gamble and carouse. Now, the main characters are not MEANT to seem incompetent-- the movie wants them to seem like badasses, but they are so out of their league that it's funny. And what can I say of our villain, The Rumble? The man was made for memes.

It's not "Good," but it is entertaining. Would recommend this with a group of friends.

In today's times I'll just about watch anything out of boredom. But, this is simply an insult to the viewers intelligence. The acting is terrible, the story line lame. I have seen home movies with better production, direction and story lines. YouTube is an better option. In fact, watching a turned off TV is more enjoyable than this rubbish.

Really it is the worst. Sets awful (spots the wheels on the steps) acting awful. Cheap cheap all round. Not seen as bad a movie for ages. Half way through it just became , what else can we spot thats awful. I think even the hench men were recycled !

Kelsey Grammar as a bad guy? Should've been the warning. Most of the first thirty minutes played out like a soap opera, and maybe because they have a soap star in it (Denise Richards, what happened to you??). Some dark humor unfolds on the money plane which broke up the monotony of a slow film. Predictable otherwise. I kept hoping for Samuel L. Jackson and snakes to appear and spoiler alert they don't.

Is it just me or was the trailer better than the movie?

Do not be fooled by the presence of Grammar or Jane -- this movie is C-tier 'entertainment', through the through. The lead "sports entertainment" wrestler and now budding actor, is as wooden as an oak tree (parried by amateurishly unseasoned / ridiculously overacting cohorts); the plot is derr-dumb stupid; the seasoned "with" actors are merely serviceable (strictly in the context of such a rubbishy project); and the overall product is little more than an exercise in pay cheque accrual. Meaningless, uninspired rubbish.

The "streaming" era and the various platforms' esurience for content, has spawned an utter glut of substandard films from substandard 'creative talent', that reach a far larger audience than they should otherwise ever merit. This film as an exemplar of thus lowering of the bar. 3/10

Clearly this film is B-grade, low budget - of which I'm sure most of the budget went to Kelsey Grammer and Denise Richards, written in part and directed by actor turned newb filmmaker, Andrew Lawrence. There were a total of 4 writers, for a story that was fairly decent and actually funny (not sure if it was meant to be). The acting by almost everyone including WWE's "Edge" wrestler turned actor Adam Copeland, was terrible. If felt unauthentic, forced and very amateurish. I'm sure the blame falls mostly on Lawrence's inexperience in directing his cast properly. A pro tip to all new filmmakers: you don't need a constant annoying and overbearing score throughout the entire 82 mins of film - of which was mostly louder than the dialogue. The poor pacing and annoying editing made it feel like a 2+ hour film. The sets were so cheese and phony - add the bad score and acting, is why I classified this as a 5th grade drama class production. I get that all filmmakers have to start somewhere, but attaching some popular names to a film, isn't as good as having just decent actors, a better set, and an assistant seasoned director that can teach you something along the way. I'd rather stumble on a non-big-name film and be impressed, than watch one because of popular actors attached, and laugh and cringe throughout the film. Nevertheless, still a fun bored-lazy Sunday popcorn flick from a newb filmmaker. It's a generous 5/10 from me.

This was by far the worst movie I have seen this summer. Who thought this was a good idea?

I've never been in a plane like this (I travel economy) but was able to grasp and connect with the plot and its mood.

It's a movie in a classic action-heist style that yet finds its own features to exhibit with its setups and payoffs, raising the stakes and providing action thrills despite not affording the most expensive special effects.

There are various reversals throughout the movie which keep it interesting until it meets its destination, so it makes for an enjoyable ride and even some of its mildly wacky absurdities infuse it with fun.

I think this movie relies on a mission to have a good time with the some underlying meaning it, so I can recommend it.

This is a fun flick. It's pure popcorn gold. The Lawrence brothers along with most of the other actors do a good job. Joey Lawrence is phenomenal in this.

..... it's a pretty bad movie! Poor production values and too much unnecessary gory violence.

Don't waste your time or money. Even if you watch for free don't waste your time. Utter rubbish. Story weak,acting just as bad.