Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Jeremy J. Sykes, Bernadette Pérez, Leroy Castanon, Diana Prince, Ernest Pierce, Molly Dougherty, Ryan Cleary, Jennifer Woods, Manny Cazz, Jessica Beck, Noël VanBrocklin, and Zamra Dollskin in Witchcraft 15: Blood Rose (2016)

User reviews

Witchcraft 15: Blood Rose

3 reviews
3/10

Witchcraft 15 Blood Rose: Hard to believe this is one of the better Witchcraft movies

Witchcraft returns along with the usual characters and this time *Shock* they haven't been recast since the last film. I guess however that's easy to do considering they made three in the same year.

This picks up from where the last film left off and that's something they haven't done thus far. It works in its favour and even though the movie is your usual mix of excess nudity, awful sfx and terrible story it is still one of the better movies in the franchise.

I still do not understand how this franchise has lasted, 16 movies starting all the way back in 1988! I scoff at the quality of the films but the length of time they've survived is admirable.

If you like the other films you'll like this, otherwise steer clear.

The Good:

Follows on directly from part 14

The Bad:

Some awful cinematography

Just plain terrible in every aspect as usual

Things I Learnt From This Movie:

I think these movies were secretly made for horny teenagers
  • Platypuschow
  • Feb 26, 2018
  • Permalink
1/10

Endlessly bad

  • Leofwine_draca
  • Jan 11, 2018
  • Permalink

Better Than the Previous Film

Witchcraft 15: Blood Rose (2016)

** (out of 4)

After the events from the previous film, Rose (Molly Dougherty) has come to terms with her having special powers. Pretty soon Sharon (Noel VanBrocklin) is using Rose's powers for her own deadly needs.

Director David Palmieri returns for this fifteenth (!!!!) entry in the incredibly long-running series. This film here picks up right where the previous one left off so it really does feel as if you're watching an extremely long film and especially when you watch them back-to-back like I did. With that said, all of the "bad" things that were in part fourteen (as well as the rest of the series) are on hand here but at the same time I found this one to be slightly more entertaining.

As you'd expect, going in expecting some sort of high art isn't the right thing to do. The film is pretty much like the rest as there's a plot dealing with witches and there's some nudity, sex and violence thrown in as well. What makes this film a bit better than the previous entry is the fact that there's a bit more sleaze going on this time. There's a lot more nudity, a lesbian scene and this here certainly helps keep the running time moving. I also give the director a lot of credit for making this film fit in well with the previous entries. This actually looks and feels like the previous movies and I appreciated that.

With that said, there's still a lot of bad things here. This includes some of the performances, which actually appear worse here than in the previous movie. I'm not exactly sure how that happened but it did. The CGI effects are incredibly cheap and bad looking. The plot doesn't have a lot going for it and some of the dialogue drags on when it's not needed.
  • Michael_Elliott
  • Jul 17, 2017
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.