Após superar seu passado traumático, uma jovem está entre várias testemunhas que veem um homem mortalmente agredido e não intervém, elas são como alvo de alguém, ou algo, em busca de vinganç... Ler tudoApós superar seu passado traumático, uma jovem está entre várias testemunhas que veem um homem mortalmente agredido e não intervém, elas são como alvo de alguém, ou algo, em busca de vingança.Após superar seu passado traumático, uma jovem está entre várias testemunhas que veem um homem mortalmente agredido e não intervém, elas são como alvo de alguém, ou algo, em busca de vingança.
Avaliações em destaque
Honestly I liked this one, the subject was interesting and it was different but... the last act when everything is reveal just destroyed what happened before and turned the film from a good " you reap what you sow" concept to a petty revenge film.
Too bad without this it would have been a 7/10, but because of this I'm force to go with a 5.
Too bad without this it would have been a 7/10, but because of this I'm force to go with a 5.
Started off reasonably well but gradually descended into farce with some truly dreadful acting with no suspense, zero scares or anything remotely new or interesting to see and utilizing some of the writing of Final Destination rather than come up with something fresh and new it plays out like a made for tv wet Sunday afternoon movie.
Writer and director Jeffrey Reddick wrote the Final Destination series - they say we all have one book in us all so I guess that was his but this one is a dud!
Writer and director Jeffrey Reddick wrote the Final Destination series - they say we all have one book in us all so I guess that was his but this one is a dud!
The underlying premise of writer/director Jeffrey Reddick's Good Samaritan a.k.a. Don't Look Back is really worthy of a decent film. Examining the guilt, responsibilities, or otherwise, of non - intervening witnesses to crimes, who prefer to film the events they see, on their phones, rather than render any assistance. In fact the opening credit sequence, intercut with various real life (I think) examples of this relatively modern social occurrence is the best in the film and hits home pretty hard.
The problems begin to occur soon after we encounter the story proper. Home invasion survivor of an incident that saw her father murdered, Caitlin Kramer is one of a number of people, who witness a man being beaten to death in a park. Though still traumatised by the after effects of the home invasion, Caitlin is able to borrow a phone from a bystander who filmed the attack and call the police. Later Caitlin feels she has to investigate, when some of the other witnesses begin to suffer gruesome deaths.
Reddick seems to have issues deciding what exact form his movie should take. A slasher film such as The Final Destination movies, a franchise he helped create? Or some sort of psychological thriller with mildly supernatural and religious undertones? Either way, what he ends up delivering isn't particularly gripping and involving. Things aren't helped by Kortney Bell's pretty ordinary performance as Caitlin, whose character isn't drawn particularly sympathetically either. In a wildly inconsistent role we viewers are constantly expected to believe she is capable of frequently alternating between lamb and lion dependent on narrative demands. One minute a wimpy onlooker, the next minute a plucky investigator intent on showering others with unwanted assistance. Skyler Hart as her boyfriend Josh Bowman, is actually drawn more realistically and sensibly. But of course she never takes his advice.
Similarly because the film is drawn from Caitlin's perspective, we frustratingly never really find out whether the many hallucinations we see, courtesy of a series of telegraphed jump shocks, are part of her diagnosed psychosis, or a creepy, supernatural element. The story is also requiring of the old standby of poor police work. (A vagrant assailant is fully caught beating a guy to death on camera and on TV and is never picked up by the cops until the storyline says it has to happen now?? A character just walks in to an un (police) guarded hospital room, where a murder suspect is being kept, because a twist ending was required??
Good Samaritan is that sort of film. Based on a potentially worthy concept, it aims for atmosphere and originality, but sadly settles for cliches and cheap, loud thrills. It's 3.7 IMDB rating is a strong indicator of its entertainment value.
The problems begin to occur soon after we encounter the story proper. Home invasion survivor of an incident that saw her father murdered, Caitlin Kramer is one of a number of people, who witness a man being beaten to death in a park. Though still traumatised by the after effects of the home invasion, Caitlin is able to borrow a phone from a bystander who filmed the attack and call the police. Later Caitlin feels she has to investigate, when some of the other witnesses begin to suffer gruesome deaths.
Reddick seems to have issues deciding what exact form his movie should take. A slasher film such as The Final Destination movies, a franchise he helped create? Or some sort of psychological thriller with mildly supernatural and religious undertones? Either way, what he ends up delivering isn't particularly gripping and involving. Things aren't helped by Kortney Bell's pretty ordinary performance as Caitlin, whose character isn't drawn particularly sympathetically either. In a wildly inconsistent role we viewers are constantly expected to believe she is capable of frequently alternating between lamb and lion dependent on narrative demands. One minute a wimpy onlooker, the next minute a plucky investigator intent on showering others with unwanted assistance. Skyler Hart as her boyfriend Josh Bowman, is actually drawn more realistically and sensibly. But of course she never takes his advice.
Similarly because the film is drawn from Caitlin's perspective, we frustratingly never really find out whether the many hallucinations we see, courtesy of a series of telegraphed jump shocks, are part of her diagnosed psychosis, or a creepy, supernatural element. The story is also requiring of the old standby of poor police work. (A vagrant assailant is fully caught beating a guy to death on camera and on TV and is never picked up by the cops until the storyline says it has to happen now?? A character just walks in to an un (police) guarded hospital room, where a murder suspect is being kept, because a twist ending was required??
Good Samaritan is that sort of film. Based on a potentially worthy concept, it aims for atmosphere and originality, but sadly settles for cliches and cheap, loud thrills. It's 3.7 IMDB rating is a strong indicator of its entertainment value.
This film highlights some pertinent issues, such as the fact that we do not help others when they are in situations of difficulty, even violence. Our morbid interest in the violence that happens to others. around us. how to overcome mourning. Strange dreams and events surround Caitlin, our heroine, hallucinations of all kinds that make her unreliable in the eyes of the authorities. Another multiracial couple is fashionable, but nothing against it. some similarities, of tenuous ideas with final Destination, here or there. There is a twist in the film but very poorly designed. As in the thrillers of lifetime, a terrible disappointment. No spoilers, Thriller is watchable although only once. promising start that degrades the end of time, both the script and the performance of the actors, the direction is average.NOT AN HORROR MOVIE AT ALL a Thriller.
Although topic is perfect, the way it is all presented, meaning story and actors is so bad. Like people exercising movie recording. Too fake, boring, amateur. Not good.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesJeremy Holm (Detective Boyd) was a frequent actor on Primetime: What Would You Do? (2009), a hidden camera show where staged scenarios are acted out in public in order to see who steps in to help. This is uncannily similar to the plot/theme of this movie.
- Trilhas sonorasHost
written by Jammes Luckett
performed by Thrillharmonik
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Don't Look Back?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Don't Look Back
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 30.780
- Tempo de duração1 hora 30 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Good Samaritan (2020) officially released in India in English?
Responda