The Pavement

I adore this very short film . For so many reasons than it seems difficult to define each in fair manner. The first virtue is the storytelling, just impecable source for haunting story. The second - the details. And the go back as pray for new - new- new chance.

Not the last, the details , giving new meaning to a story beginning as sketch.

An impressive film, indeed, about adultery, self defence and honor crowned by the only reasonable gesture in that context.

So, admirable little gem, the voice from off, the white - black image, the construction of atmosphere, the return to classic noir film being precious virtues.

So, Bravo !

A thrilling art in both of its sections (poetry & film).

"The pavement; the pavement; the night; those eyes; the glass; the red; the smoke; those lips; her touch; the breeze; the pavement. Wait. Go back."

This line of dialogue opens the film and is delivered with faded in/out clips of everything being spoken about. At the "go back" we do indeed jump back to the start of the dialogue and to the starting point for this short scene to which we are witness. Each successive time we do this, the dialogue and the scene changes a little bit – almost like it is coming more into focus for whomever it is that is narrating it for us. This simple idea is quite effective because, although the noir-delivery and the specifics of the scene are not too different, the constant resetting of the scene is delivered with a very good pace – with the clips and the narration speeding up as the viewer starts to pay more attention, and contributes towards drawing the viewer in. The film also knows when to slow down and when to linger, so that the significance of the line or clip can be allowed to sink in – not just on the viewer but mainly on the narrator himself.

The black and white images cover up the fact that some of the effects are not the absolute best, but generally it looks crisp and clean; personally I would have liked a bit less light in this noir as it is maybe too crisp for my taste, but it still works. For me it does so because of how well paced the rhythm of delivery is – both in terms of the images, the dialogue, but also the knowledge/understanding of both narrator and viewer. It is only 4 minutes long but it uses this time very well, leaving me feeling satisfied thanks to the effectiveness of the story-telling rather than the detail of the story itself.