Due spie finiscono per essere inseguite dalla CIA, dal KGB e da un gruppo di anarchici dopo che una missione fallita ha invocato un patto non scritto «cadavere per un cadavere».Due spie finiscono per essere inseguite dalla CIA, dal KGB e da un gruppo di anarchici dopo che una missione fallita ha invocato un patto non scritto «cadavere per un cadavere».Due spie finiscono per essere inseguite dalla CIA, dal KGB e da un gruppo di anarchici dopo che una missione fallita ha invocato un patto non scritto «cadavere per un cadavere».
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Revolutionary
- (as Pierre Oudry)
- Seely
- (as Jeffrey Wickham)
Recensioni in evidenza
They play a mismatched spy pair who are forced to bond when sold down the river by their various agencies and thereafter chase after some micro-dots. The two still appear to have a kind of improvisational energy, but the material they are dished up to deal with, wouldn't pass muster in an average Get Smart episode. I have to say that I'm surprised the usually very competent direction of Irvin Kershner seems to have gone completely walkabout during the making of this feature. Poorly choreographed and lit action and slapstick scenes! It's difficult to believe this is the same bloke who helmed The Empire Strikes Back 6 years later. SPYS is also lumbered with a terribly annoying musical soundtrack.
In terms of laughs most discerning viewers should find any of the Roger Moore Bond entries much more amusing. And as for spoofs, the later arriving Austin Powers or Johnny English (hell, even the Casino Royale with Peter Sellers) have it all over this clunker. I would love to have been a fly on the wall to see how SPYS was received at Cannes.
Pretty lame spy "spoof" that put a kibosh on the possibility of Donald Sutherland and Elliott Gould becoming the greatest comedy team of the '70s. The guys are both great comic actors and they have loads of screen chemistry together. If you don't care much for either of these actors you will probably hate this movie... and if you are a big, big fan of either one of them... well, you probably still won't think much of it. Playing a pair of maverick secret agents forced to work together, they start out complaining and bickering but over the course of their adventure (some overly-complicated plot about assassinations, missing diamonds and foreign agents) they begin to get chummy. Sutherland and Gould have charisma to burn but the lousy, nearly joke-free script doesn't give them much to work with. I suppose if this has been a big box office hit they could have continued the franchise and gone on to bigger and better movies together... but, this tanked with audiences and I don't think they two have worked together since. Anyway, I have to add that I have always absolutely loved the last scene of the movie... as our two defeated heroes, in full-out charming rascal mode, skip off down a lonely road together and start singing:
Oh, we don't know what's comin' tomorrow, Maybe it's trouble and sorrow, But we'll travel the road Sharin' our load Side by side
You take it, brother! Through all kinds of weatherrrrr! Did You hear that, Lord? Whether the sky should fall Whether the skyyyyy should fallllll Just as long as we're together It doesn't matter at all...
Great wrap-up... too bad about the first 85 minutes.
If it were made today it would probably star Will Ferrel and Owen Wilson. And it would probably be just as fun.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis movie was originally titled "Wet Stuff", but was changed because the producers were hoping with the re-teaming of Elliott Gould and Donald Sutherland they could tie it to the success of M*A*S*H (1970). This change was something that bothered Director Irvin Kershner. In an interview about this movie, Kershner said "I started to make a film that was a little black comedy, and I emphasized that it had no relationship to Robert Altman's MASH (1970), in which, of course, they'd been teamed so brilliantly. The original title was 'Wet Stuff', meaning blood, and the studio promised that there would be no attempt to compare it to MASH (1970) in the publicity. Because it wasn't like that. It wasn't that kind of freewheeling film. There was no time, nor the budget to do that sort of film anyway." Kershner also pointed out that this movie had much success in countries that hadn't seen MASH (1970), and comparisons weren't being made. "Now, there were many places where they hadn't seen MASH (1970), like parts of South America, Scandinavia, or Germany. In those areas they loved 'S*P*Y*S'. Actually, the film made a lot of money, and it got some great reviews in countries where it wasn't compared to MASH (1970)."
- BlooperWhen Griff and Bruland and the Russian gymnast are escaping by jumping over a railing, the stair landing is obviously cushioned.
- Citazioni
Griff, Bruland: Oh, we don't know what's comin' tomorrow... Maybe it's trouble and sorrow... But we'll travel the road... Sharin' our load... Side by side... You take it, brother... Through all kinds of weatherrrrr... Did You hear that, Lord? Whether the sky should fall... Whether the skyyyyy should fallllll... Just as long as we're together... It doesn't matter at all...
- ConnessioniFeatured in Inside S*P*Y*S (2007)
I più visti
- How long is S*P*Y*S?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Wet Stuff
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 12.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 27 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1