IMDb रेटिंग
4.7/10
1.7 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA shy, stuttering professor brings Aleister Crowley back to life.A shy, stuttering professor brings Aleister Crowley back to life.A shy, stuttering professor brings Aleister Crowley back to life.
Terence Bayler
- Professor Brent
- (as Terrence Bayler)
Geoffrey Breton
- Young Symonds
- (as Geoff Breton)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाChristina Chong and Gemma Hiles's debut.
- गूफ़Haddo states that both Jesus and Samson from the Bible were Nazarenes. Though Jesus was a Nazarene (a person from Nazareth), Samson was a nazarite, which is a person who has taken certain vows in early Judaism.
- भाव
Haddo: Why do you not take my laws seriously?
Victor Nuberg: YOUR laws?
Haddo: "Do what thou wilt. Love is the law, love under will."
Victor Nuberg: Who is it you think you are?
Haddo: Victor, who is it you think I am?
Victor Nuberg: You are Oliver Haddo. H-A-D-D-O, Haddo.
Haddo: Oh, Victor, would you deny me thrice before the cock grows?
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिट[statement before end credits] On the seventh day the old king gave me a golden medal, bearing on one side the words ART IS THE PRIESTESS OF NATURE and on the other NATURE IS THE DAUGHTER OF TIME.
- the Chymical Wedding (1616)
- साउंडट्रैकChemical Wedding
Written by Bruce Dickinson (as Dickinson)/Roy Ramirez (as Ramirez)
Performed by Bruce Dickinson
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
I want to like this movie more as it is connected to Bruce Dickinson.
I liked the concept and the basic story structure enough to make up for the massive flaws in this movie. I thought at times the movie was more gratuitous than it needed to be for no good reason... and I hate to say it, but the music was done poorly. That's not to say I don't like it, but that there were points in the movie where dialogue was impossible to understand because the music was louder. I also got confused at the end, but to be fair it's probably because the copy I watched was scratched during about three minutes- right at the climax of the movie.
I thought it was interesting though. The plot was well thought-out even if it was a bit scrunched. I liked all the references to occultism and quantum physics. If Bruce Dickinson writes another movie, I'll watch it... but I'll hope for better next time.
I liked the concept and the basic story structure enough to make up for the massive flaws in this movie. I thought at times the movie was more gratuitous than it needed to be for no good reason... and I hate to say it, but the music was done poorly. That's not to say I don't like it, but that there were points in the movie where dialogue was impossible to understand because the music was louder. I also got confused at the end, but to be fair it's probably because the copy I watched was scratched during about three minutes- right at the climax of the movie.
I thought it was interesting though. The plot was well thought-out even if it was a bit scrunched. I liked all the references to occultism and quantum physics. If Bruce Dickinson writes another movie, I'll watch it... but I'll hope for better next time.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Chemical Wedding?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Crowley
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- £25,00,000(अनुमानित)
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $9,439
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 49 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें